[Bug 1922592] [NEW] nagios doesn't refresh display for Limit Results
Public bug reported: With a running Nagios4 instance and more than 50 hosts the results are paginated. https://nagios.example.com/cgi- bin/nagios4/status.cgi?hostgroup=all=hostdetail Selecting a different # such as 100 from the 'Limit Results' dropdown does not refresh the display (reload the page). No change is observed. 50 100 250 1000 All ** Affects: nagios4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: With a running Nagios4 instance and more than 50 hosts the results are paginated. - https://nagios..example.com/cgi- + https://nagios.example.com/cgi- bin/nagios4/status.cgi?hostgroup=all=hostdetail Selecting a different # such as 100 from the 'Limit Results' dropdown does not refresh the display (reload the page). No change is observed. - + 50 100 250 1000 All -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922592 Title: nagios doesn't refresh display for Limit Results To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios4/+bug/1922592/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1885462] Re: snd_hda_intel 0000:00:0e.0: No response from codec, resetting bus:
Why was this set invalid? The change in /etc/modprobe.d/audio_powersave.conf seems more of a work-around than a fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1885462 Title: snd_hda_intel :00:0e.0: No response from codec, resetting bus: To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1885462/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1860929] Re: Should include a /usr/bin/python symlink unless..
Is this a written policy / guidance or just something you came up with on the fly? https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2018/02/16/on-python-shebangs/ has a good discussion of this issue and even suggests using python2.7 (as opposed to python2) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860929 Title: Should include a /usr/bin/python symlink unless.. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python2.7/+bug/1860929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1812671] Re: [SRU] Virtualbox in trusty 14.04 is an old version and has many security vulnerabilities
Given that 5.2.24+ is needed to solve CVE-2019-2511 and Trusty is ~3 months until EOL is it even worth doing? ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2019-2511 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812671 Title: [SRU] Virtualbox in trusty 14.04 is an old version and has many security vulnerabilities To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1812671/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1723350] Re: sssd offline on boot, stays offline forever
We are seeing this too, on Bionic servers installed from netboot / PXE. Bionic is (still) missing from the Affected Status says "Fix Released" but where is that? I don't think it's true. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1723350 Title: sssd offline on boot, stays offline forever To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1723350/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1774061] Re: git: CVE-2018-11235 arbitary code execution via submodule names in .gitmodules
DSA-4212-1 https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4212 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774061 Title: git: CVE-2018-11235 arbitary code execution via submodule names in .gitmodules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/git/+bug/1774061/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1651818] Re: busybox-initramfs needs different compile options to work with cryptroot-unlock
Still an issue in bionic final beta To unlock root partition, and maybe others like swap, run `cryptroot- unlock` BusyBox v1.27.2 (Ubuntu 1:1.27.2-2ubuntu3) built-in shell (ash) Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands. # cryptroot-unlock ps: invalid option -- 'e' BusyBox v1.27.2 (Ubuntu 1:1.27.2-2ubuntu3) multi-call binary. Usage: ps Show list of processes w Wide output l Long output /bin/cryptroot-unlock: line 186: usleep: not found -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1651818 Title: busybox-initramfs needs different compile options to work with cryptroot-unlock To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/busybox/+bug/1651818/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1662860] Re: /sbin/ldconfig.real: /usr/lib/nvidia-375/libEGL.so.1 is not a symbolic link
Impact here was an unbootable system (blank screen) not just an annoying error message. Had to boot into rescue mode to fix the files/links and run ldconfig -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1662860 Title: /sbin/ldconfig.real: /usr/lib/nvidia-375/libEGL.so.1 is not a symbolic link To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linuxmint/+bug/1662860/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1568459] Re: unison incompatible with older ubuntu/debian versions
How about just add the 2.48 version in {xenial,yakkety,zesty}-backports?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568459
Title:
unison incompatible with older ubuntu/debian versions
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unison/+bug/1568459/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1448727] [NEW] Update dnstop to version 20140915
Public bug reported: A newer release is available at http://dns.measurement-factory.com/tools/dnstop/src/dnstop-20140915.tar.gz Debian version is also (stuck) at 20120611-2 https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=dnstopsearchon=namessuite=allsection=all Concise list of changes since that version (Ref: http://dns.measurement-factory.com/tools/dnstop/src/CHANGES) 2014/09/12 Duane Wessels Added 'new-gtlds' filter, which includes only queries for names ending with one of the new (2013/2014) generic TLDs. This may be useful to find hosts/servers using internal names which may collide with new gTLDs once they become active. If you use short (not fully qualified) names internally you may be uknownlying relying on root (or other) name servers to return NXDOMAIN for them. If so, you're gonna have a bad time. Along with this new feature, TLD lists are now hashed in the code for faster lookups. 2012/11/30 Duane Wessels Added more entries to the table of known query type names (HINFO, AFSDB, PX, SSHFP, NSEC3, NSEC3PARAM, TLSA, DLV). 2012/10/15 Duane Wessels The 'refused' filter only works on responses, which are not processed by default. Now, if the 'refused' filter is specified, dnstop will automatically process responses and ignore queries. ** Affects: dnstop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1448727 Title: Update dnstop to version 20140915 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnstop/+bug/1448727/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 922428] Re: synergys crashed with SIGABRT in __GI___assert_fail()
4 months, not a single movement on this one? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922428 Title: synergys crashed with SIGABRT in __GI___assert_fail() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synergy/+bug/922428/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 944040] Re: Remmina refuses to connect after Precise Upgrade
I've been having no end of problems with Remmina - intermittantly - though I did notice that changing to an FQDN worked well (thanks for that one). I see this as a regression - what about home LAN's that don't have FQDN for hostnames? I've been forced to install xtightvncviewer and grdesktop as alternates despite having grown quite fond of Remmina since being introduced to it with 12.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/944040 Title: Remmina refuses to connect after Precise Upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/remmina/+bug/944040/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 922428] Re: synergys crashed with SIGABRT in __GI___assert_fail()
Wow, really no-one keen to look at this bug, eh? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922428 Title: synergys crashed with SIGABRT in __GI___assert_fail() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synergy/+bug/922428/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 984552] Re: iwlwifi intermittently losing connectivity
+1. Have been having constant, ongoing issues with wifi dropouts - but only with 12.04 and only in the last several weeks (did not seem to be a problem when I was running beta1. Came up later than that). I have this on two machines, running Xubuntu and Ubuntu respectively, but both 12.04 and both current/up-to-date. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805285 suggests it might be an Intel thing. (see also http://bugzilla.intellinuxwireless.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2359) - if it's the same thing. Very hard to work out what's relevant and what's not from my Syslog (found the redhat link from a search for iwlwifi :03:00.0: fail to flush all tx fifo queues as one line appearing in my syslog frequently enough) The symptom is that I appear to remain associated, but all IP traffic stops, and a continuous ping shows my local wifi interface IP reporting 'destination host unreachable' (pinging my default gateway) after a period. It can take quite a while (if at all) for the wifi association to drop and restart, getting me comms back. Doing so manually also gets me comms back - for a while. Over the last 2.5 hours, searching for 'reason=' in my syslog: May 8 18:25:04 hawkeye kernel: [ 260.422424] wlan0: deauthenticating from 00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 by local choice (reason=3) May 8 18:25:08 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:00:00:00:00:00 reason=3 May 8 18:25:08 hawkeye kernel: [ 263.732721] wlan0: deauthenticating from 00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 by local choice (reason=3) May 8 18:25:11 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:00:00:00:00:00 reason=3 May 8 18:25:11 hawkeye kernel: [ 267.051132] wlan0: deauthenticating from 00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 by local choice (reason=3) May 8 18:25:14 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:00:00:00:00:00 reason=3 May 8 18:25:14 hawkeye kernel: [ 270.401257] wlan0: deauthenticating from 00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 by local choice (reason=3) May 8 18:25:18 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:00:00:00:00:00 reason=3 May 8 18:25:18 hawkeye kernel: [ 273.815477] wlan0: deauthenticating from 00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 by local choice (reason=3) May 8 18:25:21 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:00:00:00:00:00 reason=3 May 8 18:25:21 hawkeye kernel: [ 277.149726] wlan0: deauthenticating from 00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 by local choice (reason=3) May 8 18:25:25 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:00:00:00:00:00 reason=3 May 8 18:25:25 hawkeye kernel: [ 280.527970] wlan0: deauthenticating from 00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 by local choice (reason=3) May 8 18:25:28 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:00:00:00:00:00 reason=3 May 8 18:25:28 hawkeye kernel: [ 283.814223] wlan0: deauthenticating from 00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 by local choice (reason=3) May 8 18:25:31 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:00:00:00:00:00 reason=3 May 8 18:25:31 hawkeye kernel: [ 287.160435] wlan0: deauthenticating from 00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 by local choice (reason=3) May 8 18:25:34 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:00:00:00:00:00 reason=3 May 8 18:25:34 hawkeye kernel: [ 290.426766] wlan0: deauthenticating from 00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 by local choice (reason=3) May 8 18:25:38 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:00:00:00:00:00 reason=3 May 8 18:25:38 hawkeye kernel: [ 293.705106] wlan0: deauthenticating from 00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 by local choice (reason=3) May 8 18:25:41 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:00:00:00:00:00 reason=3 May 8 18:25:41 hawkeye kernel: [ 297.051485] wlan0: deauthenticating from 00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 by local choice (reason=3) May 8 18:54:12 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 reason=1 May 8 20:16:52 hawkeye kernel: [ 6956.345223] wlan0: deauthenticating from 00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 by local choice (reason=3) May 8 20:16:52 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:00:00:00:00:00 reason=3 May 8 20:18:06 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 reason=1 May 8 20:19:11 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 reason=1 May 8 20:20:15 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 reason=4 May 8 20:25:18 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 reason=4 May 8 20:26:08 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 reason=4 May 8 20:26:40 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 reason=4 May 8 20:27:51 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 reason=1 May 8 20:28:16 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:14:6c:b0:9e:02 reason=4 May 8 20:46:42 hawkeye wpa_supplicant[2079]:
[Bug 922428] Re: synergys crashed with SIGABRT in __GI___assert_fail()
A colleague of mine upgraded and saw an improvement on his system.I had a go at upgrading but the Ubuntu 32bit package from http://synergy-foss.org/download/ threw up a bunch of 'bad package' errors so I gave up. This is very frustrating! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922428 Title: synergys crashed with SIGABRT in __GI___assert_fail() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synergy/+bug/922428/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 922428] Re: synergys crashed with SIGABRT in __GI___assert_fail()
Among other things attempts to use 'alt-tab' seem to trigger this segfault. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922428 Title: synergys crashed with SIGABRT in __GI___assert_fail() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synergy/+bug/922428/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 922428] Re: synergys crashed with SIGABRT in __GI___assert_fail()
root@radar:~# grep synerg /var/log/syslog | grep seg Apr 27 15:57:21 radar kernel: [ 5586.880657] synergyc[2492]: segfault at 8b0a75c8 ip 0040dbf2 sp bfee4378 error 4 in libstdc++.so.6.0.16[3b6000+d8000] Apr 27 16:21:02 radar kernel: [ 7008.450659] synergyc[3233]: segfault at 8b0a75c8 ip 002b2bf2 sp bf849a08 error 4 in libstdc++.so.6.0.16[25b000+d8000] Apr 27 16:21:28 radar kernel: [ 7034.331680] synergyc[3656]: segfault at 8b0a75c8 ip 004afbf2 sp bfdb28b8 error 4 in libstdc++.so.6.0.16[458000+d8000] Apr 27 16:25:52 radar kernel: [ 7298.115410] synergyc[3839]: segfault at 8b0a75c8 ip 00d56bf2 sp bfc832d8 error 4 in libstdc++.so.6.0.16[cff000+d8000] Ubuntu 12.04, didn't notice this issue at all prior to upgrading (was working fine 11.10 at least as near as I could tell). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922428 Title: synergys crashed with SIGABRT in __GI___assert_fail() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synergy/+bug/922428/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 967857] [NEW] Auto Hide for Panel 2 (Dock style Panel) randomly fails
Public bug reported: I have found some odd behavior with Panel 2 (the 'dock' panel). On at least two occasions it just disappeared (forced a reboot/restart of X) and wouldn't appear when I moused in that direction. One of these occasions it was on the left, Panel 1 at the bottom. I shuffled things around, moved Panel 1 back to the top, Panel 2 to the bottom. About a week later, Panel 2 failed to appear again, again forcing a reboot/restart of X. I opted to leave things top-and-bottom due to having them bottom-and-left causing issues trying to access the menu button for Panel 1 (Panel 2, despite not being big enough to need it, would appear when I moved to the left, and sit infront of the button for Panel 1's menu, making a very small click area available... I opted to change my user habit instead and go back to something resembling default layout) Most recently the issue I had was that Auto-Hide would't work. The 'dock' remained up, and over the top of my status bars and text etc. Going into Panel Configuration and turning off 'auto hide' would resize my applications not to sit underneath the panel, but toggling this wouldn't fix it. Restart/reboot required. markf@hawkeye:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu precise (development branch) Release:12.04 markf@hawkeye:~$ markf@hawkeye:~$ apt-cache policy xfce4-panel xfce4-panel: Installed: 4.8.6-2ubuntu2 Candidate: 4.8.6-2ubuntu2 Version table: *** 4.8.6-2ubuntu2 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status markf@hawkeye:~$ I wondered if the disappearing panel was related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-panel/+bug/53897 . However the Panel refusing to auto-hide may be a different issue. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: xfce4-panel 4.8.6-2ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.27-generic 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.95-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Mar 29 11:10:57 2012 InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin - Beta amd64 (20120228) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_NZ:en TERM=xterm LANG=en_NZ.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: xfce4-panel UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: xfce4-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967857 Title: Auto Hide for Panel 2 (Dock style Panel) randomly fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-panel/+bug/967857/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 967857] Re: Auto Hide for Panel 2 (Dock style Panel) randomly fails
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967857 Title: Auto Hide for Panel 2 (Dock style Panel) randomly fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-panel/+bug/967857/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885811] [NEW] soft lockup - jfs problem?
Public bug reported: We saw soft lockup this morning on a Ubuntu Lucid 64-bit system with kernel 2.6.32-33-server and jfs module shown here root@db11e:/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.32/fs/jfs# modinfo jfs filename: /lib/modules/2.6.32-33-server/kernel/fs/jfs/jfs.ko license:GPL author: Steve Best/Dave Kleikamp/Barry Arndt, IBM description:The Journaled Filesystem (JFS) srcversion: 78CD09626BDB4AE9FF29322 depends: vermagic: 2.6.32-33-server SMP mod_unload modversions parm: nTxBlock:Number of transaction blocks (max:65536) (int) parm: nTxLock:Number of transaction locks (max:65536) (int) parm: commit_threads:Number of commit threads (int) dmesg output (snippet) has this [4739878.082195] INFO: task mysqld:7824 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [4739878.082488] echo 0 /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs disables this message. [4739878.082852] mysqldD 0 7824 18081 0x [4739878.082857] 88004bc17b08 0082 00015f00 00015f00 [4739878.082862] 8813aaf51ad0 88004bc17fd8 00015f00 8813aaf51700 [4739878.082866] 00015f00 88004bc17fd8 00015f00 8813aaf51ad0 [4739878.082871] Call Trace: [4739878.082885] [81558303] io_schedule+0x73/0xc0 [4739878.082902] [a00420a6] txBegin+0x1b6/0x3a0 [jfs] [4739878.082910] [8115e74e] ? insert_inode_locked+0xae/0x110 [4739878.082917] [8105df00] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20 [4739878.082924] [a0025459] jfs_create+0x89/0x390 [jfs] [4739878.082927] [8115c136] ? __d_lookup+0x136/0x150 [4739878.082931] [8155a29e] ? _spin_lock+0xe/0x20 [4739878.082935] [8115c136] ? __d_lookup+0x136/0x150 [4739878.082942] [a0045c19] ? jfs_check_acl+0x29/0x78 [jfs] [4739878.082947] [8108d9f1] ? in_group_p+0x31/0x40 [4739878.082951] [8108d9f1] ? in_group_p+0x31/0x40 [4739878.082955] [8115045d] ? acl_permission_check+0x5d/0xc0 [4739878.082960] [81151f74] vfs_create+0xb4/0xe0 [4739878.082964] [81152064] __open_namei_create+0xc4/0x110 [4739878.082968] [8115580b] do_filp_open+0xa6b/0xba0 [4739878.082973] [81160b0a] ? alloc_fd+0x10a/0x150 [4739878.082978] [811447c9] do_sys_open+0x69/0x170 [4739878.082982] [81144910] sys_open+0x20/0x30 [4739878.082989] [810131b2] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [4739878.083009] INFO: task mysqld:12747 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [4739878.083289] echo 0 /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs disables this message. [4739878.112750] mysqldD 8811db94cae8 0 12747 18081 0x [4739878.112755] 880052563d38 0082 00015f00 00015f00 [4739878.112760] 8811d5089ad0 880052563fd8 00015f00 8811d5089700 [4739878.112764] 00015f00 880052563fd8 00015f00 8811d5089ad0 [4739878.112768] Call Trace: [4739878.112773] [81559037] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x107/0x190 [4739878.112777] [81151801] ? path_put+0x31/0x40 [4739878.112782] [81558a33] mutex_lock+0x23/0x50 [4739878.112786] [81155179] do_filp_open+0x3d9/0xba0 [4739878.112790] [81160b0a] ? alloc_fd+0x10a/0x150 [4739878.112794] [811447c9] do_sys_open+0x69/0x170 [4739878.112798] [81144910] sys_open+0x20/0x30 [4739878.112802] [810131b2] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Is this a jfs problem? I saw http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4747 and thought it might be the same issue but perusing the linux kernel source it appears to have the patch already. ** Affects: jfsutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885811 Title: soft lockup - jfs problem? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jfsutils/+bug/885811/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 750339] Re: Request security update for CVE-2011-0009 request-tracker3.6 request-tracker3.8
Please release the fix! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/750339 Title: Request security update for CVE-2011-0009 request-tracker3.6 request- tracker3.8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/request-tracker3.6/+bug/750339/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 608696] Re: Moose error when loading libnet-amazon-s3-perl
Sorry I just backported 0.53 and it did not fix the problem -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608696 Title: Moose error when loading libnet-amazon-s3-perl -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 608696] Re: Moose error when loading libnet-amazon-s3-perl
Per the debian bug report the package needing an update is libdata- stream-bulk-perl NOT libnet-amazon-s3-perl -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608696 Title: Moose error when loading libnet-amazon-s3-perl -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 780623] [NEW] needs packaging dnstop 20110502
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dnstop See http://dns.measurement-factory.com/tools/dnstop/src/ for a new upstream version (tarball) ** Affects: dnstop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780623 Title: needs packaging dnstop 20110502 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 780623] Re: new version of dnstop 20110502
** Summary changed: - needs packaging dnstop 20110502 + new version of dnstop 20110502 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780623 Title: new version of dnstop 20110502 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 725220] Re: insecure img src in main.html
Reported upstream. See http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=206 ** Bug watch added: tracker.nagios.org/ #206 http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=206 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios3 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725220 Title: insecure img src in main.html -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 725220] Re: insecure img src in main.html
Marc - I'm curious why you think this isn't a security vulnerability. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios3 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725220 Title: insecure img src in main.html -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 725220] Re: insecure img src in main.html
Reported upstream. See http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=206 ** Bug watch added: tracker.nagios.org/ #206 http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=206 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725220 Title: insecure img src in main.html -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 725220] Re: insecure img src in main.html
Marc - I'm curious why you think this isn't a security vulnerability. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725220 Title: insecure img src in main.html -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 715380] Re: newer e10001 driver fixes problems
I cannot run the latest development release, since this is production hardware. I'm only concerned with Lucid LTS, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715380 Title: newer e10001 driver fixes problems -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 594487] Re: Filter in default lvm.conf breaks most lvm setups
** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/594487 Title: Filter in default lvm.conf breaks most lvm setups -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 651875] Re: Bind 9.7.0-P1 validation errors
I agree that it makes more sense to go with 9.7.3 here. It's only a minor upgrade and .0 releases are historically problematic anyway. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651875 Title: Bind 9.7.0-P1 validation errors -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 651875] Re: Bind 9.7.0-P1 validation errors
Amending my comment #9. This appears to qualify as micro-version release per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/MicroReleaseExceptions and thus needs to be approved by the technical board for the criteria. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651875 Title: Bind 9.7.0-P1 validation errors -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 651875] Re: Bind 9.7.0-P1 validation errors
I agree that it makes more sense to go with 9.7.3 here. It's only a minor upgrade and .0 releases are historically problematic anyway. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651875 Title: Bind 9.7.0-P1 validation errors -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 651875] Re: Bind 9.7.0-P1 validation errors
Amending my comment #9. This appears to qualify as micro-version release per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/MicroReleaseExceptions and thus needs to be approved by the technical board for the criteria. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651875 Title: Bind 9.7.0-P1 validation errors -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239022] Re: Drag drop an image from Firefox to Writer results in strange text
What is the expected behaviour? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239022 Title: Drag drop an image from Firefox to Writer results in strange text -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 715380] [NEW] newer e10001 driver fixes problems
Public bug reported: Lucid comes with e1000e version 1.0.2-k2 This version has reported and actual problems on 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit Network Connection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632650 http://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=69 Having experience the problem, the updated driver 1.2.20 was installed from http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?agr=YDwnldID=15817 and appears to work fine + fix the problem. Please roll the newer version of the driver into the next kernel update for Lucid. Thanks. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715380 Title: newer e10001 driver fixes problems -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317989] Re: NetworkManager Applet 0.7.0 doesn't open CA certificates (PEM) with some text before '-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----'
8.10 and 9.04 are both unsupported. Unless this problem can be verified on a supported release it should be closed. ** Changed in: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317989 Title: NetworkManager Applet 0.7.0 doesn't open CA certificates (PEM) with some text before '-BEGIN CERTIFICATE-' -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277329] Re: upgrade from 0.6 [hardy] to 0.7 [intrepid beta] does not migrate (all) connection settings
Since intrepid is no longer supported, can this bug be changed invalid? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277329 Title: upgrade from 0.6 [hardy] to 0.7 [intrepid beta] does not migrate (all) connection settings -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 704531] Re: certain jpeg causes undue resource consumption
** Attachment added: zzzbad1.jpeg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704531/+attachment/1798205/+files/zzzbad1.jpeg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704531 Title: certain jpeg causes undue resource consumption -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 704531] Re: certain jpeg causes undue resource consumption
** Attachment added: lsof.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/+bug/704531/+attachment/1798206/+files/lsof.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704531 Title: certain jpeg causes undue resource consumption -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 704531] Re: certain jpeg causes undue resource consumption
mdf@sushi ~ $ apt-cache policy imagemagick imagemagick: Installed: 7:6.6.2.6-1ubuntu1.1 Candidate: 7:6.6.2.6-1ubuntu1.1 Version table: *** 7:6.6.2.6-1ubuntu1.1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-updates/main i386 Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-security/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 7:6.6.2.6-1ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main i386 Packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704531 Title: certain jpeg causes undue resource consumption -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 704531] [NEW] certain jpeg causes undue resource consumption
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: imagemagick Something about the attached jpeg (zzzbad1.jpeg) causes imagemagick (display, convert) to go bonkers. It creates a 4.1GB file in /tmp /magick- Try download the jpeg and run 'display zzzbad1.jpeg' ** Affects: imagemagick (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704531 Title: certain jpeg causes undue resource consumption -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 670978] [NEW] No such user
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pbnj scanpbnj seems broken from the get-go on lucid. It works for the root user, but not a normal user. mfos...@sea-noc-002:~$ scanpbnj id: usersmfoster: No such user Can't exec error: No such file or directory at (eval 36) line 62. Can't exec error: No such file or directory mfos...@sea-noc-002:~$ scanpbnj -h id: usersmfoster: No such user Can't exec error: No such file or directory at (eval 36) line 62. Can't exec error: No such file or directory mfos...@sea-noc-002:~$ id uid=11000(mfoster) gid=11000(ldappers) groups=11000(ldappers),11001(bp-ops),11003(bp) mfos...@sea-noc-002:~$ ls .pbnj* ls: cannot access .pbnj*: No such file or directory ** Affects: pbnj (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- No such user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/670978 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 670978] Re: No such user
Noting that, while the man page for scanpbnj DOES indicate it needs root privileges to run, the error persists even with this simple incantation. mfos...@sea-noc-002:~$ sudo scanpbnj -v id: usersmfoster: No such user Can't exec error: No such file or directory at (eval 36) line 62. Can't exec error: No such file or directory -- No such user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/670978 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 619712] Re: keepalived vrrp race condition and fix (versions 1.1.17 and 1.2.0 but perhaps all?)
Noting that the original configuration shown looks like a problem. The prio settings on the MASTER (machine3) are too low. In keepalived, higher priority wins, so machine1 and machine3 are probably trying to fight it out. I suggest the situation can be avoided by using state MASTER on all three machines, or by swapping the priority settings of machines 1 and 3 so that 3 has prio 250 and 1 has 150. -- keepalived vrrp race condition and fix (versions 1.1.17 and 1.2.0 but perhaps all?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619712 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 619712] Re: keepalived vrrp race condition and fix (versions 1.1.17 and 1.2.0 but perhaps all?)
Noting that the original configuration shown looks like a problem. The prio settings on the MASTER (machine3) are too low. In keepalived, higher priority wins, so machine1 and machine3 are probably trying to fight it out. I suggest the situation can be avoided by using state MASTER on all three machines, or by swapping the priority settings of machines 1 and 3 so that 3 has prio 250 and 1 has 150. -- keepalived vrrp race condition and fix (versions 1.1.17 and 1.2.0 but perhaps all?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619712 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 659937] Re: Security Update for Sun Java JRE 6: Update 22
This looks pretty urgent/scary/important. Please expedite a fix. Thanks. -- Security Update for Sun Java JRE 6: Update 22 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 659937] Re: Security Update for Sun Java JRE 6: Update 22
(Adding advisory information from @RISK: The Consensus Security Vulnerability Alert Vol. 9 No. 42) (2) HIGH: Oracle Java Multiple Vulnerabilities Affected: JDK and JRE 6 Update 21 and earlier for Windows, Solaris, and Linux Java SE JDK 5.0 Update 25 and earlier for Solaris Java SE SDK 1.4.2_27 and earlier for Solaris Java SE JDK and JRE 6 Update 21 and earlier for Windows, Solaris and Linux Java for Business JDK and JRE 5.0 Update 25 and earlier for Windows, Solaris and Linux Java for Business SDK and JRE 1.4.2_27 and earlier for Windows, Solaris and Linux Java for Business Description: Oracle has recently released a critical update addressing multiple security vulnerabilities. According to Oracle, the patch addresses 29 vulnerabilities, 28 of which could lead to code execution. Some of these vulnerabilities exist because of flaws in the low-level implementation of the Java Runtime Environment (JRE). Although Java is intended to be type safe, low-level code sometimes writes user-defined strings to C buffers, giving an attacker the opportunity to overwrite return addresses and execute code. Vulnerabilities like these allow Java applets, which start without user interaction when a target navigates to a malicious site, to execute with the permissions of the Java process running them. Normally applets run with restricted privileges. Status: vendor confirmed, updates available References: Vendor Site http://www.oracle.com Oracle Update Advisory - October 2010 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpuoct2010-176258.html SecurityFocus Bugtraq IDs http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36935 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/40235 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/43965 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/43971 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/43979 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/43985 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/43988 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/43992 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/43994 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/43999 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44009 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44011 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44012 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44013 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44013 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44014 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44016 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44017 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44020 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44020 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44021 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44023 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44024 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44026 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44027 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44028 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44030 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44032 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44035 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44038 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44038 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44040 Zero Day Initiative Advisories http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-10-202/ http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-10-203/ http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-10-204/ http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-10-205/ http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-10-206/ http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-10-207/ http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-10-208/ -- Security Update for Sun Java JRE 6: Update 22 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 655747] [NEW] Adobe Reader and Acrobat Font Parsing Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: acroread Adobe Reader and Acrobat Font Parsing Buffer Overflow Vulnerability Vulnerability Note VU#491991 Adobe Reader and Acrobat Font Parsing Buffer Overflow Vulnerability From http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/491991 CVE-ID(s): CVE-2010-2883 Please update acroread to 9.4.4 to mitigate this vulnerability. ** Affects: acroread (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Adobe Reader and Acrobat Font Parsing Buffer Overflow Vulnerability https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655747 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152188] Re: [needs-packaging] xca
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: In Progress = Invalid -- [needs-packaging] xca https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152188 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 340671] Re: WARNING: Could not lchown() symlink ...
Please add depends for liblchown-perl, or adjust the rsnapshot.conf defaults to link_dest 1 and cmd_cp /bin/cp as described earlier. -- WARNING: Could not lchown() symlink ... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340671 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 90546] Re: debmirror fails to properly check Release(.gpg)
Just ran into this on lucid. Fixed by adding the link mentioned earlier... ln -s ~/.gnupg/pubring.gpg ~/.gnupg/trustedkeys.gpg -- debmirror fails to properly check Release(.gpg) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90546 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 597790] [NEW] installer display corruption on ASUS ASMB3-iKVM remote console
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: debian-installer Using the Java remote console provided by ASUS ASMB3-iKVM unit. It displays BIOS, POST and initial install screens fine, but once it gets into the debian installer screens (red/blue) the display is all messed up. It comes across as 648x481 and it seems the extra pixel (481 not 480) may be causing the screen to zag across. Unusable. I found some vague reference to the problem on ASUS website: http://support.asus.com/faq/asus-faq.aspx?type=1no=897CAD71-0440-5AE7-32EC-3C4A3CEAB7C7model=ASMB4-iKVMSLanguage=en-us which indicates the ASPEED vga driver should be used. Well, how does that happen at install time? Attaching a screenshot of the display problem. Please review and decide whether it is something that can/should be fixed. Thanks. P.S. This also happens with Debian 5.04 netinst. However booting Debian with the Graphical Expert mode (which I suppose is akin to installgui) is a viable workaround. ** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- installer display corruption on ASUS ASMB3-iKVM remote console https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597790 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 597790] Re: installer display corruption on ASUS ASMB3-iKVM remote console
** Attachment added: 20100623a.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50811657/20100623a.png -- installer display corruption on ASUS ASMB3-iKVM remote console https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597790 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579663] Re: segmentation fault from gui
bitpus...@sea-vms2:~$ /usr/bin/qtconfig-qt4 QGtkStyle was unable to detect the current GTK+ theme. Segmentation fault However, xeyes works after installing x11-apps package. Note that this is over a SSH forwarded session (using -Y argument to ssh) -- segmentation fault from gui https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579663 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 580611] Re: variable scope problem
Also, I went to add the URL as an upstream bug and it rejected the URL as invalid http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/3155 It seems the upstream bug tracker URL for puppet might be outdated now. -- variable scope problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to puppet in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 580611] [NEW] variable scope problem
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: puppet See http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/3155 and http://projects.puppetlabs.com/versions/show/41 Please upgrade puppet to 0.25.5 which fixes a number of important bugs. ** Affects: puppet (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- variable scope problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to puppet in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 580611] Re: variable scope problem
Also, I went to add the URL as an upstream bug and it rejected the URL as invalid http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/3155 It seems the upstream bug tracker URL for puppet might be outdated now. -- variable scope problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 580611] [NEW] variable scope problem
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: puppet See http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/3155 and http://projects.puppetlabs.com/versions/show/41 Please upgrade puppet to 0.25.5 which fixes a number of important bugs. ** Affects: puppet (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- variable scope problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579663] [NEW] segmentation fault from gui
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: virtualbox-ose bitpus...@sea-vms2:~$ VirtualBox Qt WARNING: QGtkStyle was unable to detect the current GTK+ theme. (GUI appears, then upon clicking File-Preferences...) Segmentation fault 1) The release of Ubuntu you are using, via 'lsb_release -rd' or System - About Ubuntu. Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Release:10.04 2) The version of the package you are using, via 'apt-cache policy packagename' or by checking in Synaptic. virtualbox-ose: Installed: 3.1.6-dfsg-2ubuntu2 Candidate: 3.1.6-dfsg-2ubuntu2 Version table: *** 3.1.6-dfsg-2ubuntu2 0 500 ftp://10.1.0.13/mirror/ftp.osuosl.org/ubuntu-lucid-current/ lucid/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3) What you expected to happen I expect the VirtualBox program to run so I can adjust the settings, create new VMs and so on. 4) What happened instead It crashes before I can do anything useful. FWIW the same behavior (segmentation fault) occurs using the 3.1.8 package downloaded from virtualbox.org I am attaching a gzip compressed core file generated as per the instructions at http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Core_dump ** Affects: virtualbox-ose (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- segmentation fault from gui https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579663 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579663] Re: segmentation fault from gui
** Attachment added: core dump #1 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48350974/core.gz -- segmentation fault from gui https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579663 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 561562] Re: Blank tooltips
** Changed in: lmms (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Blank tooltips https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561562 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364439] Re: lmms crashed with SIGSEGV in instrumentTrack::processOutEvent()
** Changed in: lmms (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: lmms (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = New -- lmms crashed with SIGSEGV in instrumentTrack::processOutEvent() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364439 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574160] [NEW] lmms crashes (segfault) on gui events
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: lmms Using lmms with lucid and it is crashing on mouse actions. 1. when listening to sounds in the My Presets 2. when manipulating notes in the Piano Roll ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: lmms 0.4.5-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun May 2 20:39:39 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha i386 (20100227) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: lmms ** Affects: lmms (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- lmms crashes (segfault) on gui events https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574160 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574160] Re: lmms crashes (segfault) on gui events
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47440811/Dependencies.txt -- lmms crashes (segfault) on gui events https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574160 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 564861] [NEW] puppetmaster error /etc/puppet/files
On 04/16/2010 12:08 PM, Mathias Gug wrote: On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 05:27:36PM -, BitPusher wrote: Public bug reported: Binary package hint: puppet I just installed Lucid and puppetmaster. It shows an error in the syslog Apr 16 10:19:41 sea-build3 puppetmasterd[540]: Removing mount files: /etc/puppet/files does not exist or is not a directory Does that prevent the puppetmasterd process from starting? No, the puppetmasterd process runs as normal. Since the configuration is almost unchanged What has been modified? Nothing - this message appears with the default configuration. I just verified this. importance low status incomplete -- +_+ Mark Foster - Sr. Systems Engineer -|- BitPusher, LLC -http://www.bitpusher.com/ / \ 1-888-9PUSHER x803mailto:mfos...@bitpusher.com Skype: bitpusher-mfoster IRC: #bitpusher on freenode -- puppetmaster error /etc/puppet/files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564861 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to puppet in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 527401] Re: grub-installer fails to install on a raid1 array
Filesystems used? Are you doing it by hand or preseeding? I just use the generic recipe from the README contained in the partman-auto-raid and it works (as I described earlier, it bombed once afterwards but was fine after that). -- grub-installer fails to install on a raid1 array https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527401 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 564861] [NEW] puppetmaster error /etc/puppet/files
On 04/16/2010 12:08 PM, Mathias Gug wrote: On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 05:27:36PM -, BitPusher wrote: Public bug reported: Binary package hint: puppet I just installed Lucid and puppetmaster. It shows an error in the syslog Apr 16 10:19:41 sea-build3 puppetmasterd[540]: Removing mount files: /etc/puppet/files does not exist or is not a directory Does that prevent the puppetmasterd process from starting? No, the puppetmasterd process runs as normal. Since the configuration is almost unchanged What has been modified? Nothing - this message appears with the default configuration. I just verified this. importance low status incomplete -- +_+ Mark Foster - Sr. Systems Engineer -|- BitPusher, LLC -http://www.bitpusher.com/ / \ 1-888-9PUSHER x803mailto:mfos...@bitpusher.com Skype: bitpusher-mfoster IRC: #bitpusher on freenode -- puppetmaster error /etc/puppet/files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564861 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 510571] Re: Lucid guest won't boot with acpi in virtualbox
Trying this on lucid beta2 With acpi=off kernel arg it boots up fine and I can install. Without acpi=off it boots extremely sluggish and debinstaller is unusable. In both cases, the VirtualBox settings have ACPI enabled. -- Lucid guest won't boot with acpi in virtualbox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510571 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 527401] Re: grub-installer fails to install on a raid1 array
Following up on comments in 532729 Tried this (again) on Lucid Beta2 and it gets much further - the grub-install step does not FAIL like it had before. However on subsequent boot of the machine it brings up a busybox prompt as shown in the attachment ** Attachment added: 20100409a.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43593678/20100409a.png -- grub-installer fails to install on a raid1 array https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527401 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 527401] Re: grub-installer fails to install on a raid1 array
Addendum to my last comment... after rebooting from busybox the system did come up. So it looks as though the grub-install problem is fixed here. -- grub-installer fails to install on a raid1 array https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527401 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 466935] Re: No Video Output in Karmic with ID 046d:09a1 Logitech, Inc. QuickCam Communicate MP/S5500
I have this problem also, under Lucid Beta1 -- No Video Output in Karmic with ID 046d:09a1 Logitech, Inc. QuickCam Communicate MP/S5500 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 532729] Re: Grub install fails to Raid1
I ran into this also. Attaching screenshots and debug logs in case it helps. ** Attachment added: partman from debug logs http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42107518/partman.txt -- Grub install fails to Raid1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532729 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 532729] Re: Grub install fails to Raid1
** Attachment added: hardware-summary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42107566/hardware-summary.txt -- Grub install fails to Raid1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532729 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 532729] Re: Grub install fails to Raid1
** Attachment added: syslog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42107645/syslog.txt -- Grub install fails to Raid1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532729 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 532729] Re: Grub install fails to Raid1
** Attachment added: 20100326a.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42107732/20100326a.png -- Grub install fails to Raid1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532729 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 532729] Re: Grub install fails to Raid1
** Attachment added: 20100326b.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42107778/20100326b.png -- Grub install fails to Raid1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532729 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 532729] Re: Grub install fails to Raid1
** Attachment added: 20100326c.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42107799/20100326c.png -- Grub install fails to Raid1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532729 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 532729] Re: Grub install fails to Raid1
** Attachment added: 20100326d.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42107934/20100326d.png -- Grub install fails to Raid1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532729 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 536803] [NEW] kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c:939!
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: jfsutils System crashed last night. Here is what I found in /var/log/syslog ^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@] [ cut here ] Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.264019] kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c:939! Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.264071] invalid opcode: [1] SMP Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.264106] CPU 0 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.264129] Modules linked in: autofs4 iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables ipv6 af_packet parport_pc lp parport loop container ipmi_si ipmi_msghandler button shpchp pci_hotplug iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support evdev serio_raw pcspkr psmouse jfs pata_acpi ata_piix usbhid hid ata_generic libata ehci_hcd cciss tg3 scsi_mod uhci_hcd usbcore dm_mirror dm_snapshot dm_mod thermal processor fan fbcon tileblit font bitblit softcursor fuse Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.264373] Pid: 2422, comm: jfsCommit Not tainted 2.6.24-26-server #1 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.264402] RIP: 0010:[jfs:txUnlock+0x237/0x270] [jfs:txUnlock+0x237/0x270] :jfs:txUnlock+0x237/0x270 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.264460] RSP: 0018:81003a725e90 EFLAGS: 00010286 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.264487] RAX: 0067 RBX: c26ea708 RCX: 0001 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.264531] RDX: 80590f68 RSI: 0082 RDI: 80590f60 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.264575] RBP: 810039285a00 R08: 81003a722048 R09: 81003a99d038 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.264619] R10: 810001009880 R11: 0001 R12: 1c19 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.264663] R13: c258f380 R14: 81003784d400 R15: Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.264708] FS: () GS:805c6000() knlGS: Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.264753] CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 8005003b Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.264781] CR2: f7cc8f1c CR3: 09ca4000 CR4: 06e0 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.264825] DR0: DR1: DR2: Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.264869] DR3: DR6: 0ff0 DR7: 0400 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.264913] Process jfsCommit (pid: 2422, threadinfo 81003a724000, task 81003a722000) Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.264959] Stack: 81003784d510 c258f380 8100378f7800 81003784d400 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.265013] cccd 881a84d5 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.265065] 81003a722000 80236540 00100100 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.265100] Call Trace: Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.265149] [jfs:jfs_lazycommit+0x245/0x270] :jfs:jfs_lazycommit+0x245/0x270 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.265192] [80236540] default_wake_function+0x0/0x10 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.265228] [jfs:jfs_lazycommit+0x0/0x270] :jfs:jfs_lazycommit+0x0/0x270 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.265258] [kthread+0x4b/0x80] kthread+0x4b/0x80 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.265286] [child_rip+0xa/0x12] child_rip+0xa/0x12 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.265316] [kthread+0x0/0x80] kthread+0x0/0x80 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.265343] [child_rip+0x0/0x12] child_rip+0x0/0x12 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.265370] Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.265389] Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.265389] Code: 0f 0b eb fe 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 c7 c1 63 ca 1a 88 ba a5 03 00 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel: [1528762.265490] RIP [jfs:txUnlock+0x237/0x270] :jfs:txUnlock+0x237/0x270 Mar 7 01:13:00 hostname-omitted kernel:
[Bug 152188] Re: [needs-packaging] xca
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/lucid-changes/2010-January/002491.html I think this can be closed now. -- [needs-packaging] xca https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152188 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152188] Re: [needs-packaging] xca
This is now included in upstream debian. Not sure how to get it included in ubuntu (Lucid) or is that automatic? -- [needs-packaging] xca https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152188 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483263] [NEW] [needs-packaging] sudosh2
Public bug reported: Please package sudosh2 for karmic and lucid. (I plan to work on this). http://sourceforge.net/projects/sudosh2 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Assignee: Mark Foster (fostermarkd) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) = Mark Foster (fostermarkd) ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = In Progress -- [needs-packaging] sudosh2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 442862] Re: OpenVPN over Network-Manager very instable, often failes to connect
Kudos for that last suggestion from Jan-Phillip Litza, it fix the issue for me. -- OpenVPN over Network-Manager very instable, often failes to connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 283843] Re: kernel BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [jfsCommit:2338]
After some time this problem has gone away, It was only after we replaced 5 of the 12 disks and rebuild the system numerous times. The disks were Seagate drives reporting ST3_INVALID_PFM on inquiry. You can close this issue. -- kernel BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [jfsCommit:2338] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283843 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 12296] Re: PHP5 or PHP4 for apache2-mpm-worker
How about just modifying libapache2-mod-php5 to depend on apache2 instead of apache2-mpm-prefork? -- PHP5 or PHP4 for apache2-mpm-worker https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a bug assignee. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 12296] Re: PHP5 or PHP4 for apache2-mpm-worker
How about just modifying libapache2-mod-php5 to depend on apache2 instead of apache2-mpm-prefork? -- PHP5 or PHP4 for apache2-mpm-worker https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139514] Re: raid10 support should be added to installer
Please let's get this into the next LTS release. -- raid10 support should be added to installer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139514 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227744] Re: dapper upgrade to hardy: openldap silently refuses to start when unable to open SSL certificates - main: TLS init def ctx failed: -64 - openldap user not in ssl-cert group
Adding the openldap to the ssl-cert group by default is not an option Please explain why. Is it a technical reason or a policy reason? Thanks. -- dapper upgrade to hardy: openldap silently refuses to start when unable to open SSL certificates - main: TLS init def ctx failed: -64 - openldap user not in ssl-cert group https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs . -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227744] Re: dapper upgrade to hardy: openldap silently refuses to start when unable to open SSL certificates - main: TLS init def ctx failed: -64 - openldap user not in ssl-cert group
Adding the openldap to the ssl-cert group by default is not an option Please explain why. Is it a technical reason or a policy reason? Thanks. -- dapper upgrade to hardy: openldap silently refuses to start when unable to open SSL certificates - main: TLS init def ctx failed: -64 - openldap user not in ssl-cert group https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317734] Re: mysql initscript fails
Changing sleep 1 to sleep 10 on line 111 is what fixes the problem for me. Perhaps a TIMEOUT setting in /etc/defaults/mysql to set the timeout length would be the proper fix here. -- mysql initscript fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317734 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 283843] Re: kernel BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [jfsCommit:2338]
wtf - almost two months and nobody has even triaged this? -- kernel BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [jfsCommit:2338] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283843 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 300660] Re: nagios3-common package should not have configuration files named as *-nagios2.cfg
I respectfully disagree. IMO they should not have nagios3 or nagios2 in the path names at all, instead... /etc/nagios/conf.d/contacts.cfg /etc/nagios/conf.d/extinfo.cfg This matches up with the paths from nagios-plugins and is the better approach. Nobody is going to feasibly run nagios2 nagios3 on the same host, and the nagios-plugins are not using those (version-specific) paths either... so you end up with a mix of /etc/nagios /etc/nagios3 what sense does that make? Please go back to using /etc/nagios/ as the configuration base. -- nagios3-common package should not have configuration files named as *-nagios2.cfg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios3 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 300660] Re: nagios3-common package should not have configuration files named as *-nagios2.cfg
I respectfully disagree. IMO they should not have nagios3 or nagios2 in the path names at all, instead... /etc/nagios/conf.d/contacts.cfg /etc/nagios/conf.d/extinfo.cfg This matches up with the paths from nagios-plugins and is the better approach. Nobody is going to feasibly run nagios2 nagios3 on the same host, and the nagios-plugins are not using those (version-specific) paths either... so you end up with a mix of /etc/nagios /etc/nagios3 what sense does that make? Please go back to using /etc/nagios/ as the configuration base. -- nagios3-common package should not have configuration files named as *-nagios2.cfg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 288226] Re: DRBD 8.0.11 is unusably slow
Sounds like a blow off. Where is this policy documented? I don't see why a relatively minor upgrade from 8.0.11 to 8.0.13 would not be warranted if this bug is verified. -- DRBD 8.0.11 is unusably slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to drbd8 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 288226] Re: DRBD 8.0.11 is unusably slow
Sounds like a blow off. Where is this policy documented? I don't see why a relatively minor upgrade from 8.0.11 to 8.0.13 would not be warranted if this bug is verified. -- DRBD 8.0.11 is unusably slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152188] Re: [needs-packaging] xca
What is taking so long on the REVU process for this package. -- [needs-packaging] xca https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152188 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 283843] [NEW] kernel BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [jfsCommit:2338]
Public bug reported: This keeps happening on our backup server which is running Ubuntu 8.04.1 LTS Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.213472] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [jfsCommit:2338] Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214360] CPU 0: Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214361] Modules linked in: iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables 8021q parport_pc lp parport loop ipv6 evdev usbhid hid ipmi_si ipmi_msghandler container ata_piix pata_acpi button psmouse pcspkr serio_raw shpchp pci_hotplug iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support jfs ata_generic ehci_hcd uhci_hcd libata usbcore tg3 cciss scsi_mod dm_mirror dm_snapshot dm_mod thermal processor fan fbcon tileblit font bitblit softcursor fuse Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214404] Pid: 2338, comm: jfsCommit Not tainted 2.6.24-19-server #1 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214406] RIP: 0010:[dm_mirror:_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x20] [dm_mirror:_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x20] _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x10 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214414] RSP: 0018:81003abc3da8 EFLAGS: 0202 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214416] RAX: 007fcaf0 RBX: 0100 RCX: 01ae7c10 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214418] RDX: 012eaff8 RSI: 0202 RDI: 81002682f510 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214420] RBP: R08: 81000bce3b80 R09: 810027e92c00 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214422] R10: R11: R12: 81003f927ff0 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214424] R13: 00021513 R14: R15: 0100 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214426] FS: () GS:805c4000() knlGS: Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214428] CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 8005003b Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214430] CR2: 7f7f8b692000 CR3: 38f73000 CR4: 06e0 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214432] DR0: DR1: DR2: Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214434] DR3: DR6: 0ff0 DR7: 0400 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214435] Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214436] Call Trace: Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214451] [jfs:dbUpdatePMap+0x2a3/0x480] :jfs:dbUpdatePMap+0x2a3/0x480 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214460] [jfs:txAllocPMap+0xdd/0x120] :jfs:txAllocPMap+0xdd/0x120 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214467] [jfs:txUpdateMap+0x1ae/0x270] :jfs:txUpdateMap+0x1ae/0x270 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214472] [usbhid:__wake_up+0x43/0x1d50] __wake_up+0x43/0x70 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214479] [jfs:jfs_lazycommit+0x120/0x270] :jfs:jfs_lazycommit+0x120/0x270 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214482] [802362c0] default_wake_function+0x0/0x10 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214489] [jfs:jfs_lazycommit+0x0/0x270] :jfs:jfs_lazycommit+0x0/0x270 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214493] [kthread+0x4b/0x80] kthread+0x4b/0x80 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214496] [child_rip+0xa/0x12] child_rip+0xa/0x12 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214500] [kthread+0x0/0x80] kthread+0x0/0x80 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214503] [child_rip+0x0/0x12] child_rip+0x0/0x12 Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214505] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/cron.d# mount /dev/cciss/c0d0p2 on / type jfs (rw,noatime,errors=remount-ro) proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) /sys on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) varrun on /var/run type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,mode=0755) varlock on /var/lock type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,mode=1777) udev on /dev type tmpfs (rw,mode=0755) devshm on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) /dev/mapper/system-backup on /bitpusher type jfs (rw,noatime) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/cron.d# uname -a Linux sea-backup-001 2.6.24-19-server #1 SMP Fri Jul 11 21:50:43 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux Kernel options (from /boot/grub/menu.lst) kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.24-19-server root=UUID=49cb3e65-df4a-4810-a7d2-ebc32f91611d ro console=tty0 console=ttyS1,115200 noapic ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- kernel BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [jfsCommit:2338] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283843 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 283843] Re: kernel BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [jfsCommit:2338]
** Attachment added: dmesg.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18567510/dmesg.log -- kernel BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [jfsCommit:2338] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283843 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
