[Bug 1243190] Re: Failed to connect to virtio-serial channel

2013-11-20 Thread Matt Whiteley
Great, happy to test again if you need it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1243190 Title: Failed to connect to virtio-serial channel To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1243190] Re: Failed to connect to virtio-serial channel

2013-11-19 Thread Matt Whiteley
Martin - thanks! I had the udev package held to 175-0ubuntu29 and allowed it to update to the released 204-0ubuntu19 version. I then built the 1.22.4-1ubuntu1 package locally using pbuilder and it works great. Both libguestfs-test- tool and my application using libguestfs work properly. -- You

[Bug 1243190] Re: Failed to connect to virtio-serial channel

2013-11-18 Thread Matt Whiteley
Could we please get a decision on if this will be updated in Saucy or if I should file a backports request for it? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1243190 Title: Failed to

[Bug 1249097] Re: gearadmin crashes on launch

2013-11-18 Thread Matt Whiteley
I rebuilt the 1.0.6-2 source package in a pbuilder chroot and the resulting packages all seem to work fine. I see the Trusty version has a build1 suffix without any changes. Should something similar be done for Saucy? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1249097] [NEW] gearadmin crashes on launch

2013-11-07 Thread Matt Whiteley
Public bug reported: traktor:~$ gearadmin -h Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-version.c: 224: _dl_check_map_versions: Assertion `needed != ((void *)0)' failed! ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package: gearman-tools 1.0.6-2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-12.19-generic 3.11.3

[Bug 1243190] Re: Failed to connect to virtio-serial channel

2013-10-31 Thread Matt Whiteley
Is this something that will be published to saucy-updates or saucy- backports? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1243190 Title: Failed to connect to virtio-serial channel To manage

[Bug 1242794] Re: Missing virtio-port symlinks

2013-10-30 Thread Matt Whiteley
There is no `name` in that directory which certainly would explain the lack of a named symlink. I provided a name (id) to the virtserialport device in the qemu options. -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Oct 30 07:22 dev lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root0 Oct 30 07:22 device - ../../../virtio0 drwxr-xr-x

[Bug 1242794] Re: Missing virtio-port symlinks

2013-10-30 Thread Matt Whiteley
I was wrong about the default of the name attribute to the virtserialport and when providing it the virtio-ports symlink is created as expected in my direct qemu test. My original problem was that libguestfs-test-tool doesn't work with this udev version and that is still the case even though it

[Bug 1242794] Re: Missing virtio-port symlinks

2013-10-29 Thread Matt Whiteley
This is from as similar an environment as I could recreate outside the libguestfs-test-tool. I'd noticed the difference in that rule and tried to remove the SUBSYSTEM check without success before, sorry I didn't mention that. Here is the udevadm dump, looks like the subsystem is correct, but I'm

[Bug 1242794] [NEW] Missing virtio-port symlinks

2013-10-21 Thread Matt Whiteley
Public bug reported: After upgrading from Raring to Saucy, our libguestfs system stopped working. I then tried a fresh install of Saucy with the same results. I narrowed the issue down to the udev package. I was able to downgrade the udev package to the previous non-systemd (175-0ubuntu29)

[Bug 118745] Re: Font sizes in Gutsy are affected by bad X.org DPI detection

2007-09-18 Thread matt whiteley
The official update fixed the issue for me. Thanks. -- Font sizes in Gutsy are affected by bad X.org DPI detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118745 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 48918] Re: shadow passwords not enabled (no rootpw)

2006-06-13 Thread Matt Whiteley
This seems a lot worse to me than low urgency if kickstart is supposed to be a supported method of installing. Should we be running `shadowconfig on` in the postinstall or something? This was working previously with dapper, from looking back at logs it appears to have been in the march/april