[Bug 1968405] Re: yaru-theme-gnome-shell fails to install ["/usr/share/themes/Yaru/gnome-shell/calendar-today-light.svg.dpkg-new": No such file or directory]

2022-04-12 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I can confirm this bug, and it is not a space issue. The problem is that is a symbolic link that messes with dpkg unpacking: ls -lha /usr/share/themes/Yaru/gnome-shell lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 28 Feb 6 2020 /usr/share/themes/Yaru/gnome-shell -> ../../gnome-shell/theme/Yaru This currently

[Bug 1953428] Re: /etc/PackageKit/Vendor.conf specifies invalid CodecUrl

2022-03-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
What should be the replacement link? On Debian, we use https://wiki.debian.org/PackageKit/ItemNotFound#Missing_Codec -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953428 Title:

[Bug 1963904] Re: /usr/libexec/packagekitd:11:__strcmp_avx2:AptCacheFile::resolvePkgID:AptIntf::resolvePackageIds:backend_get_details_thread:pk_backend_job_thread_setup

2022-03-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Patch added: "01_fix-single-candidate-pkgid-emission.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1963904/+attachment/5566548/+files/01_fix-single-candidate-pkgid-emission.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1963904] Re: /usr/libexec/packagekitd:11:__strcmp_avx2:AptCacheFile::resolvePkgID:AptIntf::resolvePackageIds:backend_get_details_thread:pk_backend_job_thread_setup

2022-03-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Looks like PK needs an updated `fix-single-candidate-pkgid-emission.patch` patch (attached). I queued it for Debian, but I am secretly waiting whether we will get another PK bugfix release in time (there's a few things left that I need to have a look at). In any case, I believe the attached

[Bug 1961837] Re: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

2022-02-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
For completeness, a much better and simpler patch is this: https://salsa.debian.org/pkgutopia-team/packagekit/-/blob/0c43611b82879bd71e633af02878d9c80283f7da/debian/patches/01_fix-single-candidate-pkgid-emission.patch Maybe that will make its way into Ubuntu Jammy too, but it's not as urgent :-)

[Bug 1961837] Re: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

2022-02-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Debian package is available: https://tracker.debian.org/news/1305719/accepted-packagekit-125-2-source-into-unstable/ I forgot to mark this issue as being explicitly closed in the changelog, but I guess Julian can do that when merging the changes into Ubuntu :-) ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu

[Bug 1961837] Re: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

2022-02-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Also affects: packagekit via https://github.com/PackageKit/PackageKit/issues/534 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961837 Title:

[Bug 1961837] Re: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

2022-02-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klumpp (ximion) ** Also affects: packagekit (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Critical Assignee: Matthias Klumpp (ximion) Status: New ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Pr

[Bug 1961837] Re: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

2022-02-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Sounded like a daemon crash at first, but the deeper I dig the more nonsensical it gets at the moment... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961837 Title: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to

[Bug 1914278] Re: Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels cleanup

2022-02-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
> packagekit will attempt to upgrade itself while running. This causes a packagekit crash That should not happen - do you have a backtrace for that? Reporting it at the PackageKit bugtracker would also be nice so I have it on my radar. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1914278] Re: Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels cleanup

2022-02-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Makes sense to me :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914278 Title: Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels cleanup To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1914278] Re: Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels cleanup

2022-02-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I tested this with a bunch of dummy packages and a local repository, and everything worked pretty well and states were applied as expected. Of course, doesn't mean that there may be a real-world bug that I haven't seen yet, but I think it's unlikely (I've also been running this on my machine on

[Bug 1914278] Re: Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels cleanup

2022-02-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Resolving this required a fair bit of refactoring, so TBH I am not sure that it is safe to backport to Focal, unless version 1.2.5 is submitted as-a-whole. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1958721] Re: appstreamcli refresh-cache reports MDB_MAP_FULL

2022-01-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
You have a cache bigger than 256MB?? This issue is already fixed with appstream 0.15.0, but I still would like to know why your cache is so huge. What's you system locale? ** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) Status: New =>

[Bug 1927149] Re: Irrelevant translatable strings

2021-09-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I still think this is a dumb fix, especially since you loose the feature to actually mark strings from being untranslatable by dropping the appstream dependency. A proper workaround would be to leave that in, possibly backport the ITS patch for appstream to update the file, and then mark the

[Bug 1926104] Re: Ubuntu software center lists Wesnoth as proprietary

2021-08-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
How does the `project_license` tag in Wesnoths AppStream MetaInfo file look like? Because that's the thing that is looked at to determine whether the license is free. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1782304] Re: package libappstream3:amd64 0.9.4-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

2021-01-12 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is not a problem in "appstream", it's usually a package manager issue, e.g. if there was a power outage during upgrades or install/remove steps. In this case, it just randomly hit the appstream package. If the APT installation is fixed, this problem should go away. Please file an issue

[Bug 1903574] Re: isenkram-lookup crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

2020-12-05 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Not really fixed, AppStream has an incomplete workaround for the gobject-introspection bug (which may break at any time for new functions in either Python or Vala, if we aren't super careful). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1903574] Re: isenkram-lookup crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

2020-11-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
The bug is actually this one, in gobject-introspection: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/-/issues/305 ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/-/issues #305 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/-/issues/305 -- You received this bug

[Bug 1879291] Re: rdmd is missing in package ldc

2020-10-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Simple: rdmd is not part of either gdc or ldc and is its own separate tool, which has not been packaged. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879291 Title: rdmd is missing in package ldc

[Bug 1881894] Re: Apps from PPAs with AppStream metadata are not displayed

2020-06-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is kind of to be expected, PPAs - unlike the main Ubuntu repositories - do not support AppStream. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881894 Title: Apps from PPAs with AppStream

[Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Nice :-) Now only the gnome-software patch is missing to fix this issue completely (at least for the package, according to Launchpad) ** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Confirmed => Triaged --

[Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307 Title: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal To manage

[Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Neat :-) That should do the job for all combinations of snap-store and gnome-software, once the GS patch is in there as well. Thanks Ken for doing the integration work :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
On a fresh Ubuntu installation, apt-config-icons isn't installed by default (at least it wasn't when I installed a fresh Ubuntu yesterday, until I replaced the snap-store with the packaged gnome-software). So new users who aren't upgrading from a previous Ubuntu version will still have much less

[Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@nicocarbone: You'll also want to do something that `apt-config-icons` is installed alongside `appstream` in Ubuntu desktops that use the gnome-software Snap. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1825766] Re: search results don't match apt search

2020-05-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
On 1): The metainfo/appdata file is only enough if it is complete, so, contains an icon reference and name/summary/etc. tags. If it doesn't, then you'll need the .desktop file as well and a launchable entry. On 2): All of these locations are wrong ^^ Metainfo files *must* be installed into

[Bug 1866134] Re: Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

2020-05-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
>From looking at this again, I'm pretty sure that my patch from #1864307 will actually fix this issue too :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866134 Title: Yaru icons are not shown

[Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Actually, I just realized that Ubuntu has its very own, new flavor of this bug due to shipping gnome-software as a Snap. The `appstream` package is seeded with the minimal desktop seed, which is good, but in order for the Snap version of GS to install any icons, the `apt-config-icons` package

[Bug 1825766] Re: search results don't match apt search

2020-05-01 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@stuardo: The reason for Guake being missing is that the `guake.desktop` file in `/usr/share/applications` is a symbolic link *and* the application doesn't ship a metainfo file. This is forbidden: https://wiki.debian.org/AppStream/Guidelines The .desktop file being a symlink results in Guake

[Bug 1875307] Re: Missing application icons Gnome-Software Xubuntu 20.04

2020-04-27 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1864307 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1873493 icons missing from main and internal pages ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1864307 Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal --

[Bug 1873493] Re: icons missing from main and internal pages

2020-04-27 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1864307 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1864307 Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1861705] Re: The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information.

2020-04-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1872258 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872258 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1861631 "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information." ** This bug has been marked

[Bug 1862216] Re: Unclear AppStream message in `update` output

2020-04-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1872258 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872258 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1861631 "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information." ** This bug has been marked

[Bug 1861631] Re: "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."

2020-04-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1872258 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872258 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1872258 GS injects invalid metadata, causing "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored" -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-04-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1866134 Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues #918 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues/918 ** Also affects: gnome-software via

[Bug 1866134] Re: Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

2020-04-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Ooooh, sorry... I was coming from duplicate #1864307, which the patch above solves, but I am not sure if this particular issue is solved as well... So, I don't think #1864307 is a duplicate bug of this, I think those two are separate issues

[Bug 1866134] Re: Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

2020-04-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Or rather, use the even better (attached) patch :-P ** Patch added: "0001-appstream-Don-t-solely-add-a-stock-icon-for-an-app-a.patch"

[Bug 1866134] Re: Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

2020-04-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
You will want this patch, unless there are further modifications to it in the next few days: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome- software/-/commit/d743f920867d8f57beac56191c8912147ef23c8f -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1872258] [NEW] GS injects invalid metadata, causing "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored"

2020-04-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Public bug reported: Hi! GNOME Software currently injects invalid AppStream metadata in Focal, causing a complaint message like "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." on every APT update. This can be fixed by applying this patch from upstream and

[Bug 1867471] Re: FFe: Sync appstream 0.12.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-03-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Patch added: "appstream_0.12.10-1_to_0.12.10-2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1867471/+attachment/5337013/+files/appstream_0.12.10-1_to_0.12.10-2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1867471] [NEW] FFe: Sync appstream 0.12.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-03-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
c-data.patch: Update the license and TLD lists to validate newer licenses correctly. * Bump standards version: No changes needed -- Matthias Klumpp Sat, 14 Mar 2020 16:40:14 +0100 ** Affects: appstream (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: New ** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) I

[Bug 1867469] Re: Update failed on allmost all Ubuntu 20.04 systems

2020-03-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@lammert-nijhof: Your locale/keyboard layout is likely messed up - type your password without sudo, to see which password you are actually typing for your account (and then adjust to the keyboard layout you currently have for repair) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1737466] Re: Kubuntu Discover packaging uses packagekit backend by default; should instead default to Flatpak

2020-03-12 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: plasma-discover (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737466 Title: Kubuntu Discover packaging uses packagekit backend by default;

[Bug 1867215] [NEW] FFE: Sync ldc 1:1.20.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-03-12 Thread Matthias Klumpp
/ldc/issues/3346 -- Matthias Klumpp Sun, 08 Mar 2020 20:14:24 +0100 ** Affects: ldc (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: New ** Changed in: ldc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Summary changed: - Sync ldc 1:1.20.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) +

[Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-02-27 Thread Matthias Klumpp
There are two things which could be the cause for this: 1) The appstream-generator used for Focal is old, and there were quite a few fixes to find more icons and ignore apps without sufficient icon data in more recent releases. @laney will hopefully update the tool ;-) 2) GNOME Software has a

[Bug 1861631] Re: "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."

2020-02-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Technically, PPAs with AppStream data or other repositories with broken data can trigger this as well. AppStream could make a guess who is to blame for the breakage and give a more specific error, but that will require some more extensive code changes. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1861631] Re: "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."

2020-02-02 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This error message is shown not to alert users, but rather make users report these issues to the distributor, as this particular issue means the distributor has a mistake in their metadata somewhere. In this case it's not Ubuntu's fault directly, but rather GNOME Software injecting invalid

[Bug 1794213] Re: Crash on Upgrade preparation from 18.04 to 18.10 in APT::Update::Post-Invoke-Success

2020-01-18 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is resolved in `appstream >= 0.12.7` (since the code doesn't exist there anymore). The original issue was likely caused by AppStream not handling broken metadata correctly, which is an area that has also been improved greatly. ** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix

[Bug 1848387] Re: dpkg error when triggers are activated

2020-01-18 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is resolved in appstream >= 0.12.10-1 ** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848387 Title: dpkg error when

[Bug 1718453] Re: apt does not download dep11 files for foreign architectures and appstream cannot find applications for these archs.

2020-01-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
At this point, I think it's safe to say that implementing full multiarch support for AppStream simply isn't going to happen, at least not anytime soon. It's simply easier for app authors to provide native implementations for amd64 instead of relying on i386 compatibility. If support was

[Bug 1564570] Re: Gnome Software catalog entry missing for Steam except on i386

2020-01-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
At this point, I think it's safe to say that implementing full multiarch support for AppStream simply isn't going to happen. It's simply better for app authors to provide native implementations for amd64 instead of relying on i386 compatibility. If support was implemented fully, we would

[Bug 1720552] Re: appstreamcli crashed with SIGSEGV in gvs_tuple_needed_size()

2020-01-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
The specific code that resulted in this issue doesn't exist in newer AppStream releases, so this sort of is "fixed" that way, as this issue can't be triggered anymore. ** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1567630] Re: Skype not shown as installation candidate

2020-01-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
At this point, I think it's safe to say that implementing full multiarch support for AppStream simply isn't going to happen. It's simply better for app authors to provide native implementations for amd64 instead of relying on i386 compatibility. If support was implemented fully, we would

[Bug 1841130] Re: idle, idle-python is missing from Apps Store

2019-08-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
IDLE has no icon, and apparently never had one: http://appstream.ubuntu.com/bionic/universe/issues/idle-python3.6.html The very best way to fix this permanently in the future would be to ask Python upstream to add a metainfo file for IDLE as described in

[Bug 1825766] Re: search results don't match apt search

2019-04-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
You can expect to find an app in GNOME Software if it is a GUI application (== has a .desktop file in /usr/share/applications/ that isn't NoDisplay and of Type=Application). For anything else (that likely includes phpMyAdmin) GNOME Software isn't the right tool and wasn't designed for. Apps will

[Bug 1673258] Re: Remove aptdaemon and drop or port its reverse-dependencies

2019-04-18 Thread Matthias Klumpp
It's worth mentioning that while PackageKit will likely not receive much feature development unless someone steps up to do that, it is in solid maintenance mode and likely will remain like that for quite some time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1799851] Re: Software Boutique window suddenly shows Welcome window and looses all the apps I queued to install

2018-10-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
GNOME Software might be the wrong package, the MATE Software Boutique is a different app. A quick search suggests that it might be part of the MATE welcome center, but a look into the package couldn't confirm that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1798822] Re: GLib-ERROR on refresh-cache

2018-10-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1792537 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1792537 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1792537

[Bug 1790613] Re: Regression: packagekit crashes updating itself to a new version

2018-10-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Yes, I completely missed that change, this needs to be changed. I need to prepare a new upload for Debian anyway, maybe I can change this behavior on the weekend at Debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1790613] Re: Regression: packagekit crashes updating itself to a new version

2018-10-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
We don't actively kill PackageKit when updating it, we just tell the daemon to quit itself as soon as possible if it can do so. Also, a packagekitd times out automatically when inactive. So this crash really shouldn't happen... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1790693] Re: appstreamcli crash when attempting release upgrade to cosmic

2018-09-04 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1785498 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498 While the actual bug is fixed in cosmic already, it might make sense to backport it to ensure upgrades run smoothly. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1785498 g_atomic_ref_count_dec:

[Bug 1785498] Re: g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

2018-09-04 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498 Title: g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc)

[Bug 1790220] Re: Sync debspawn 0.2.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-09-01 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Thank you! :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790220 Title: Sync debspawn 0.2.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1790220] [NEW] Sync debspawn 0.2.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-08-31 Thread Matthias Klumpp
fixed in cosmic. Since this package is entirely new, there is no regression potential in syncing it. Changelog entries since current cosmic version 0.1.0-1: debspawn (0.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version: 0.2.0 * Add missing Vcs-* URLs -- Matthias Klumpp Tue, 28 Aug

[Bug 1789023] Re: Widelands package from Universe is not in the Software Center

2018-08-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
The widelands package/metadata needs fixing for it to appear. See http://appstream.ubuntu.com/cosmic/universe/issues/widelands.html ** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Also affects: widelands (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You

[Bug 1788923] Re: MyPaint website button goes to wrong website

2018-08-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Package changed: gnome-software (Ubuntu) => mypaint (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788923 Title: MyPaint website button goes to wrong website To manage notifications

[Bug 1788894] Re: Hash Sum mismatch: DEP-11 Icons

2018-08-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is not an issue in appstream, but likely the Ubuntu archive. But it could also be snapcraft doing something weird (that cache path is odd!). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788894

[Bug 450410] Re: Uses deprecated dpkg --print-installation-architecture

2018-08-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Fixed for a while already. ** Changed in: makedev (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450410 Title: Uses deprecated dpkg

[Bug 1675163] Re: Don't attempt to create devices in LXC containers

2018-08-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
FWIW, I ran into that issue today as well, and it was really annoying. So I fixed in in Debian in a generic way, so this should work for every container solution out there. It requires systemd-detect-virt (systemd) to be installed prior to installing makedev though (which usually is the case).

[Bug 1788112] Re: font-manager does not appear in gnome-software

2018-08-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@jbicha: Those changes will *never* affect a released Debian or Ubuntu version, only in-development stuff. The earliest point I actually would consider making such a change is after the Debian Buster release and at least one release before the next Ubuntu LTS. Also, the amount of packages with

[Bug 1788112] Re: ubuntu software not synced with synaptic

2018-08-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
It would be neat though if font-manager fixed at least the issues listed at https://appstream.debian.org/sid/main/issues/font-manager.html with its metadata. I do actually plan to not have ancient metadata processed anymore at some point in the future (ancient data is really rare in the archive

[Bug 1788175] Re: AppStream system cache was updated, but problems were found: Metadata files have errors: /var/cache/app-info/xmls/fwupd.xml Reading package lists... Done E: Problem executing scripts

2018-08-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is a bug in fwupd/the LVFS data that AFAIK was already fixed there. ** Package changed: appstream (Ubuntu) => fwupd (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788175 Title:

[Bug 1785498] Re: g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klumpp (ximion) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1787821] Re: appstreamcli refresh crashes with glib error

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1785498 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1785498 g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1785498] Re: g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is fixed in Debian now, in package appstream/0.12.2-2. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #906538 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906538 ** Also affects: appstream (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906538 Importance: Unknown

[Bug 1787774] Re: appstreamcli crashed with signal 5 in g_variant_new_parsed_va()

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1785498 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1785498 g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed ** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug

[Bug 1785498] Re: g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
See the linked upstream issue for details - this will be fixed soon. ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Bug watch added: github.com/ximion/appstream/issues #198 https://github.com/ximion/appstream/issues/198 ** Also affects: appstream via

[Bug 1787802] Re: appstreamcli crashed with signal 5 in g_variant_new_parsed_va()

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1785498 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of private bug 1787774 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1785498 g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed -- You received

[Bug 1709144] Re: /usr/bin/appstreamcli:*** Error in `appstreamcli': double free or corruption (!prev): ADDR ***

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This issue was actually fixed in AppStream ages ago - definitely resolved in Bionic+. ** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1774491] Re: pkcon install fails -- proxy?

2018-05-31 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This very much looks like a bug int Aptdaemon's PK compatibility layer to me. At this point, it likely makes no sense to fix this issue, since that code has been dropped after the Xenial release. @tlc: This will likely be a won't fix bug, please upgrade to Bionic if you can. If you can't

[Bug 1773825] Re: Libre Impress 'Recently Used' list does not have Impress recent docs, but Writer recent docs

2018-05-28 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Package changed: appstream (Ubuntu) => libreoffice (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773825 Title: Libre Impress 'Recently Used' list does not have Impress recent docs,

[Bug 1773535] Re: Delicate failure with Ubuntu when using Firebox email

2018-05-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Package changed: appstream (Ubuntu) => firefox (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773535 Title: Delicate failure with Ubuntu when using Firebox email To manage

[Bug 1295986] Re: After checking for updates, apper incorrectly shows system is up to date

2018-04-30 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Is this still an issue on Ubuntu 18.04? ** Changed in: apper (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295986 Title: After checking for updates,

[Bug 1412733] Re: apper search doesn't provide any results

2018-04-30 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Is this still an issue on Ubuntu 18.04? ** Changed in: apper (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1412733 Title: apper search doesn't provide any

[Bug 1766591] Re: Sync dcontainers 0.8.0~alpha.6-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-04-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Looks like this actually has been synced in time! Awesome! ** Changed in: dcontainers (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766591 Title: Sync

[Bug 1762293] Re: FFE: Sync appstream-generator 0.7.1-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-04-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Jup, a backport would make sense, and fortunately should be very easy due to appstream itself being up-to-date in Bionic :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762293 Title: FFE: Sync

[Bug 1762293] Re: FFE: Sync appstream-generator 0.7.1-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-04-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Since today is the final release date of Bionic, there is no way this update will go in. ** Changed in: appstream-generator (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1766591] [NEW] Sync dcontainers 0.8.0~alpha.6-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-04-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
-- Matthias Klumpp <m...@debian.org> Mon, 23 Apr 2018 23:04:26 +0200 dcontainers (0.8.0~alpha.5-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Update maintainer address to tracker.d.o * fix-gc-hashmap-crash.patch: Fix crash in GC collection when using a HashMap containing GC-managed el

[Bug 1716900] Re: apt-get: order of the dependencies ends in a diffrent result

2018-04-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Package changed: appstream (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716900 Title: apt-get: order of the dependencies ends in a diffrent result To manage

[Bug 1720552] Re: appstreamcli crashed with SIGSEGV in gvs_tuple_needed_size()

2018-04-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) Assignee: Matthias Klumpp (ximion) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720552 Title: appstreamcli crashed with SIGS

[Bug 1762292] Re: FFE: Sync appstream 0.12.0-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-04-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Nice, thank you all! :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762292 Title: FFE: Sync appstream 0.12.0-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1762292] Re: FFE: Sync appstream 0.12.0-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-04-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
It is built now in https://launchpad.net/~ximion/+archive/ubuntu/appstream/+packages (it appears like enabling more architectures either needs approval or doesn't cause package already in the archive not to be built on these...) Let me know if there is anything more I can do to help! -- You

[Bug 1762563] Re: Does not build/test D code properly

2018-04-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Relevant upstream bug reports: https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/pull/3336 (crash) and https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/3337 (flags not applied). ** Bug watch added: github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues #3337 https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/3337 -- You received this bug

[Bug 1762563] Re: Does not build/test D code properly

2018-04-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Patch added: "02_add-d-feature-flags-tests.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meson/+bug/1762563/+attachment/5108528/+files/02_add-d-feature-flags-tests.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1762563] [NEW] Does not build/test D code properly

2018-04-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Public bug reported: Hi! The current Meson version in Ubuntu has two regressions which cause D code builds to fail. This issue is very annoying to have in an LTS release, and it might even cause existing packages in Ubuntu to FTBFS on a full archive rebuild (it definitely causes them to skip

[Bug 1762563] Re: Does not build/test D code properly

2018-04-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Patch added: "03_fix-d-feature-flags-apply.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meson/+bug/1762563/+attachment/5108529/+files/03_fix-d-feature-flags-apply.patch ** Changed in: meson (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1762293] [NEW] FFE: Sync appstream-generator 0.7.1-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-04-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
ngelog entries since current bionic version 0.6.8-2build2: appstream-generator (0.7.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium * fix-32bit-build.patch: Update patch -- Matthias Klumpp <m...@debian.org> Fri, 06 Apr 2018 21:28:48 +0200 appstream-generator (0.7.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium

[Bug 1762292] [NEW] FFE: Sync appstream 0.12.0-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-04-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
t updating this package allows for a more recent appstream-generator package to be included make it reasonable to update the package. Changelog entries since current bionic version 0.11.8-3: appstream (0.12.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium * load-desktop-data.patch: Load desktop file data properly

[Bug 1758968] Re: Sync dub 1.8.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-03-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Okay, the issue is fixed and I made a convenience upload with the change to Debian (we already have a similar change already in the package that is mostly useful for Ubuntu). You basically need this patch https://salsa.debian.org/d-team/dub/commit/699af0cfe4db8239b21d13c1d46769b7667cb881 or

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >