[Bug 496922] Re: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

2012-06-28 Thread Michael Heldebrant
snmp commands do work with:

mheldebr@server:/$ snmpwalk -v2c -c REDACTED localhost 
'NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendOutLine.svncommits.1'
NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendOutLine.svncommits.1 = STRING: 11486

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496922

Title:
  Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/496922/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 496922] Re: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

2012-06-28 Thread Michael Heldebrant
snmp commands do work with:

mheldebr@server:/$ snmpwalk -v2c -c REDACTED localhost 
'NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendOutLine.svncommits.1'
NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendOutLine.svncommits.1 = STRING: 11486

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496922

Title:
  Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/496922/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1015819] Re: sb_sasl_generic_pkt_length: received illegal packet length when using ldapsearch and sasl with ssl or tls

2012-06-22 Thread Michael Heldebrant
I can't use GSSAPI via sasl to receive data from the ldap server if SSL
or TLS is used as I get illegal packet length errors as reported.  Non
encrypted ldap is working with no issues using GSSAPI authentication.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015819

Title:
  sb_sasl_generic_pkt_length: received illegal packet length when using
  ldapsearch and sasl with ssl or tls

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/1015819/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1015819] Re: sb_sasl_generic_pkt_length: received illegal packet length when using ldapsearch and sasl with ssl or tls

2012-06-22 Thread Michael Heldebrant
I can't use GSSAPI via sasl to receive data from the ldap server if SSL
or TLS is used as I get illegal packet length errors as reported.  Non
encrypted ldap is working with no issues using GSSAPI authentication.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015819

Title:
  sb_sasl_generic_pkt_length: received illegal packet length when using
  ldapsearch and sasl with ssl or tls

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/1015819/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1015819] [NEW] sb_sasl_generic_pkt_length: received illegal packet length when using ldapsearch and sasl with ssl or tls

2012-06-20 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Public bug reported:

Not sure if this is a problem with openldap or cyrus-sasl2 at this
point.

Using sasl binding only works with ldapsearch when not using ssl or tls.
If either ssl or tls is used I see this ouput from -d 1 from ldapsearch:

sb_sasl_generic_pkt_length: received illegal packet length of 813957120 bytes
sasl_generic_read: want=16, got=16
  :  00 7e 02 01 00 78 84 00  00 00 5d 0a 01 02 04 00   .~...x].  
sb_sasl_cyrus_decode: failed to decode packet: generic failure
sb_sasl_generic_read: failed to decode packet
ldap_read: want=8 error=Input/output error

# numResponses: 0
ldap_result: Can't contact LDAP server (-1)
tls_write: want=165 error=Connection reset by peer
tls_write: want=165 error=Bad file descriptor

** Affects: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015819

Title:
  sb_sasl_generic_pkt_length: received illegal packet length when using
  ldapsearch and sasl with ssl or tls

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/1015819/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1015819] [NEW] sb_sasl_generic_pkt_length: received illegal packet length when using ldapsearch and sasl with ssl or tls

2012-06-20 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Public bug reported:

Not sure if this is a problem with openldap or cyrus-sasl2 at this
point.

Using sasl binding only works with ldapsearch when not using ssl or tls.
If either ssl or tls is used I see this ouput from -d 1 from ldapsearch:

sb_sasl_generic_pkt_length: received illegal packet length of 813957120 bytes
sasl_generic_read: want=16, got=16
  :  00 7e 02 01 00 78 84 00  00 00 5d 0a 01 02 04 00   .~...x].  
sb_sasl_cyrus_decode: failed to decode packet: generic failure
sb_sasl_generic_read: failed to decode packet
ldap_read: want=8 error=Input/output error

# numResponses: 0
ldap_result: Can't contact LDAP server (-1)
tls_write: want=165 error=Connection reset by peer
tls_write: want=165 error=Bad file descriptor

** Affects: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015819

Title:
  sb_sasl_generic_pkt_length: received illegal packet length when using
  ldapsearch and sasl with ssl or tls

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/1015819/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 496922] Re: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

2012-06-13 Thread Michael Heldebrant
It seems then that neither exec not extend let me anchor the oid where I
want like I could before.  Either way will give

I just had to go digging for the numeric OID to poll with cacti with
snmpwalk.

mheldebr@server:/svn-hotcopy$ sudo grep extend /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf
extend svncommits /bin/sh /svn-hotcopy/svnyoungest

mheldebr@server:/svn-hotcopy$ snmpwalk -v 2c -c REDACTED localhost 
NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendObjects -On
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.1.0 = INTEGER: 1
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.2.1.2.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
STRING: /bin/sh
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.2.1.3.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
STRING: /svn-hotcopy/svnyoungest
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.2.1.4.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
STRING:
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.2.1.5.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
INTEGER: 5
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.2.1.6.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
INTEGER: exec(1)
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.2.1.7.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
INTEGER: run-on-read(1)
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.2.1.20.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
INTEGER: permanent(4)
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.2.1.21.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
INTEGER: active(1)
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.3.1.1.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
STRING: 11145
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.3.1.2.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
STRING: 11145
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.3.1.3.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
INTEGER: 1
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.3.1.4.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
INTEGER: 0
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.4.1.2.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115.1 = 
STRING: 11145

mheldebr@server:/svn-hotcopy$ snmpget -v 2c -c REDACTED localhost \ 
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.4.1.2.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115.1
NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendOutLine.svncommits.1 = STRING: 11145

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496922

Title:
  Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/496922/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 496922] Re: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

2012-06-13 Thread Michael Heldebrant
It seems then that neither exec not extend let me anchor the oid where I
want like I could before.  Either way will give

I just had to go digging for the numeric OID to poll with cacti with
snmpwalk.

mheldebr@server:/svn-hotcopy$ sudo grep extend /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf
extend svncommits /bin/sh /svn-hotcopy/svnyoungest

mheldebr@server:/svn-hotcopy$ snmpwalk -v 2c -c REDACTED localhost 
NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendObjects -On
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.1.0 = INTEGER: 1
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.2.1.2.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
STRING: /bin/sh
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.2.1.3.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
STRING: /svn-hotcopy/svnyoungest
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.2.1.4.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
STRING:
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.2.1.5.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
INTEGER: 5
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.2.1.6.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
INTEGER: exec(1)
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.2.1.7.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
INTEGER: run-on-read(1)
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.2.1.20.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
INTEGER: permanent(4)
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.2.1.21.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
INTEGER: active(1)
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.3.1.1.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
STRING: 11145
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.3.1.2.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
STRING: 11145
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.3.1.3.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
INTEGER: 1
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.3.1.4.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115 = 
INTEGER: 0
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.4.1.2.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115.1 = 
STRING: 11145

mheldebr@server:/svn-hotcopy$ snmpget -v 2c -c REDACTED localhost \ 
.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.4.1.2.10.115.118.110.99.111.109.109.105.116.115.1
NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendOutLine.svncommits.1 = STRING: 11145

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496922

Title:
  Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/496922/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 415353] Re: karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with bnx2x

2012-05-22 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Documentation of the issue seems like a reasonable way forwards,
assuming the crc32c module is also pre-installed into the installer
initrd and left as a choice for the sysadmin to add it manually.

The first reboot post install would still be affected until adding the
module into the the documentation steps could be performed though.

Is there some way to make udev or some other process that is aware of
the presence of the affected hardware notify the admin to include the
module?

On the other hand this patch really doesn't seem too intrusive as it
will only install the module when it is actually needed, this would also
create the initrd properly for the first reboot post install.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415353

Title:
  karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with
  bnx2x

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/415353/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 496922] Re: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

2012-05-18 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Script essentially is giving me a counter to watch the rate of commits
on a subversion repository:

mheldebr@server:~$ /svn-hotcopy/svnyoungest
10386

I tried both exec (works on RHEL5 configured like this) and extend which
both fail:

Snippet of snmpd.conf file with exec style:
exec 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.3 svncommits /bin/sh /svn-hotcopy/svnyoungest

mheldebr@server:~$ snmpwalk -v 2c -c REDACTED localhost 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.3
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.3 = No Such Object available on this agent at 
this OID

And configured as extend:
extend 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.3 svncommits /svn-hotcopy/svnyoungest

mheldebr@server:~$ snmpwalk -v 2c -c REDACTED localhost 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.3
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.3 = No Such Object available on this agent at 
this OID

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496922

Title:
  Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/496922/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 496922] Re: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

2012-05-18 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Script essentially is giving me a counter to watch the rate of commits
on a subversion repository:

mheldebr@server:~$ /svn-hotcopy/svnyoungest
10386

I tried both exec (works on RHEL5 configured like this) and extend which
both fail:

Snippet of snmpd.conf file with exec style:
exec 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.3 svncommits /bin/sh /svn-hotcopy/svnyoungest

mheldebr@server:~$ snmpwalk -v 2c -c REDACTED localhost 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.3
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.3 = No Such Object available on this agent at 
this OID

And configured as extend:
extend 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.3 svncommits /svn-hotcopy/svnyoungest

mheldebr@server:~$ snmpwalk -v 2c -c REDACTED localhost 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.3
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.3 = No Such Object available on this agent at 
this OID

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496922

Title:
  Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/496922/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 415353] Re: karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with bnx2x

2012-05-18 Thread Michael Heldebrant
I can confirm that adding crc32c as a manual entry in the /etc
/initramfs-tools/modules and rebuilding the initramfs with update-
initramfs -u does work to fix the problem on Ubuntu 10.04.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415353

Title:
  karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with
  bnx2x

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/415353/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 496922] Re: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

2012-05-04 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Lucid is still affected with this issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496922

Title:
  Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/496922/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 496922] Re: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

2012-05-04 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Lucid is still affected with this issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496922

Title:
  Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/496922/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 415353] Re: karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with bnx2x

2012-04-06 Thread Michael Heldebrant
I'll try adding the crc32c module in as well for the next reboot.  It
won't be until May that I can test this on the server during scheduled
maintenance.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415353

Title:
  karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with
  bnx2x

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/415353/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 415353] Re: karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with bnx2x

2012-03-30 Thread Michael Heldebrant
I added libcrc32a to /etc/initramfs-tools/modules (module is libcrc32a
and not libcrc32) and this time during boot I saw an unlogged to the
boot or syslog message about a missing symbol in that module and then
the same long pause behavior for trying to load the network driver on
boot.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415353

Title:
  karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with
  bnx2x

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/415353/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 415353] Re: karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with bnx2x

2012-03-30 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Make that libcrc32c for the module name.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415353

Title:
  karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with
  bnx2x

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/415353/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 415353] Re: karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with bnx2x

2012-03-08 Thread Michael Heldebrant
I see a delay of about 3-4 minutes on boot as the blade tries the 8
ethernet interfaces and times out on the missing libcrc32 module on all
of them.

The server is booted from a local disk.  I can attempt to add libcrc32
to the module list next scheduled reboot.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415353

Title:
  karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with
  bnx2x

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/415353/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 415353] Re: karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with bnx2x

2012-02-22 Thread Michael Heldebrant
This also affects my HP blade server on boot with the Lucid 10.04
2.6.32-38 kernel.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415353

Title:
  karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with
  bnx2x

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/415353/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 839390] Re: Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today

2011-12-22 Thread Michael Heldebrant
SSL regression appears to be when used for ldap communication to active
directory servers, not for serving http.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839390

Title:
  Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/839390/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 839390] Re: Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today

2011-12-22 Thread Michael Heldebrant
SSL regression appears to be when used for ldap communication to active
directory servers, not for serving http.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839390

Title:
  Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/839390/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 839390] Re: Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today

2011-10-31 Thread Michael Heldebrant
I'm also seeing intermittent LDAP failures to bind for users with this
version of the apache2 package.  I think a regression in ssl support for
ldap has occured with this version of apache2.  I've put one of my two
misbehaving servers back to 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.4 to see if the problems go
away.  A server that has not upgraded from 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.4 has been
fine during the periods the 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.6 servers show problems.

Any update, or any other information needed to resolve this that I can
provide?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839390

Title:
  Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/839390/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 839390] Re: Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today

2011-10-31 Thread Michael Heldebrant
I'm also seeing intermittent LDAP failures to bind for users with this
version of the apache2 package.  I think a regression in ssl support for
ldap has occured with this version of apache2.  I've put one of my two
misbehaving servers back to 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.4 to see if the problems go
away.  A server that has not upgraded from 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.4 has been
fine during the periods the 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.6 servers show problems.

Any update, or any other information needed to resolve this that I can
provide?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839390

Title:
  Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/839390/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 839390] Re: Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today

2011-10-18 Thread Michael Heldebrant
I've worked around this bug at this time by adding:

LDAPVerifyServerCert  off

to the server config to get around the problem at this time.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839390

Title:
  Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/839390/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 839390] Re: Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today

2011-10-18 Thread Michael Heldebrant
I've worked around this bug at this time by adding:

LDAPVerifyServerCert  off

to the server config to get around the problem at this time.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839390

Title:
  Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/839390/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 691726] [NEW] ext4 not able to online resize

2010-12-17 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: e2fsprogs

Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
Release:10.04

e2fsprogs:
  Installed: 1.41.11-1ubuntu2.1
  Candidate: 1.41.11-1ubuntu2.1
  Version table:
 *** 1.41.11-1ubuntu2.1 0
500 http://hivemind.epicsys.com/aptmirror/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 1.41.11-1ubuntu2 0
500 http://hivemind.epicsys.com/aptmirror/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages

I cannot online resize my ext4 filesystem.

r...@server:/usr/share/doc/e2fsprogs# resize2fs /dev/vg/lv
resize2fs 1.41.11 (14-Mar-2010)
Filesystem at /dev/vg/lv is mounted on /some/fs; on-line resizing required
old desc_blocks = 5, new_desc_blocks = 10
resize2fs: Input/output error While checking for on-line resizing support

r...@server:/usr/share/doc/e2fsprogs# tune2fs -l /dev/vg/lv
tune2fs 1.41.11 (14-Mar-2010)
Filesystem volume name:   none
Last mounted on:  /some/fs
Filesystem UUID:  ca55b6cd-d717-4ca6-b82d-a9ab5d8dc687
Filesystem magic number:  0xEF53
Filesystem revision #:1 (dynamic)
Filesystem features:  has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype 
needs_recovery extent flex_bg sparse_super large_file huge_file uninit_bg 
dir_nlink extra_isize
Filesystem flags: signed_directory_hash
Default mount options:(none)
Filesystem state: clean
Errors behavior:  Continue
Filesystem OS type:   Linux
Inode count:  4915200
Block count:  19660800
Reserved block count: 983040
Free blocks:  9603091
Free inodes:  4915139
First block:  0
Block size:   4096
Fragment size:4096
Reserved GDT blocks:  1019
Blocks per group: 32768
Fragments per group:  32768
Inodes per group: 8192
Inode blocks per group:   512
Flex block group size:16
Filesystem created:   Tue Nov 30 09:36:42 2010
Last mount time:  Tue Nov 30 09:38:36 2010
Last write time:  Thu Dec 16 20:47:30 2010
Mount count:  1
Maximum mount count:  30
Last checked: Tue Nov 30 09:36:42 2010
Check interval:   15552000 (6 months)
Next check after: Sun May 29 10:36:42 2011
Lifetime writes:  148 GB
Reserved blocks uid:  0 (user root)
Reserved blocks gid:  0 (group root)
First inode:  11
Inode size:   256
Required extra isize: 28
Desired extra isize:  28
Journal inode:8
Default directory hash:   half_md4
Directory Hash Seed:  a68a2094-bb57-4282-bbbd-4752e4e7d77a
Journal backup:   inode blocks

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: e2fsprogs 1.41.11-1ubuntu2.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.43-server 2.6.32.15+drm33.5
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-server x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri Dec 17 15:39:51 2010
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Release Candidate amd64 
(20100419.1)
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SourcePackage: e2fsprogs

** Affects: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691726

Title:
  ext4 not able to online resize

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 691726] Re: ext4 not able to online resize

2010-12-17 Thread Michael Heldebrant


-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691726

Title:
  ext4 not able to online resize

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 691726] Re: ext4 not able to online resize

2010-12-17 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Apparently it has something to do with this filesystem as I can resize a
freshly created one mounted or not:

r...@server:/usr/share/doc/e2fsprogs# lvcreate -L1G -n lvtest vg
  Logical volume lvtest created
r...@server:/usr/share/doc/e2fsprogs# mkfs.ext4 /dev/vg/lvtest
mke2fs 1.41.11 (14-Mar-2010)
Filesystem label=
OS type: Linux
Block size=4096 (log=2)
Fragment size=4096 (log=2)
Stride=0 blocks, Stripe width=0 blocks
65536 inodes, 262144 blocks
13107 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user
First data block=0
Maximum filesystem blocks=268435456
8 block groups
32768 blocks per group, 32768 fragments per group
8192 inodes per group
Superblock backups stored on blocks:
32768, 98304, 163840, 229376

Writing inode tables: done
Creating journal (8192 blocks): done
Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done

This filesystem will be automatically checked every 29 mounts or
180 days, whichever comes first.  Use tune2fs -c or -i to override.
r...@server:/usr/share/doc/e2fsprogs# lvextend -L+1G /dev/vg/lvtest
  Extending logical volume lvtest to 2.00 GiB
  Logical volume lvtest successfully resized
r...@server:/usr/share/doc/e2fsprogs# resize2fs /dev/vg/lvtest
resize2fs 1.41.11 (14-Mar-2010)
Resizing the filesystem on /dev/vg/lvtest to 524288 (4k) blocks.
The filesystem on /dev/vg/lvtest is now 524288 blocks long.

r...@server:/usr/share/doc/e2fsprogs# mkdir /mnt/test
r...@server:/usr/share/doc/e2fsprogs# mount /dev/vg/lvtest /mnt/test/
r...@server:/usr/share/doc/e2fsprogs# lvextend -L+1G /dev/vg/lvtest
  Extending logical volume lvtest to 3.00 GiB
  Logical volume lvtest successfully resized
r...@server:/usr/share/doc/e2fsprogs# resize2fs /dev/vg/lvtest
resize2fs 1.41.11 (14-Mar-2010)
Filesystem at /dev/vg/lvtest is mounted on /mnt/test; on-line resizing required
old desc_blocks = 1, new_desc_blocks = 1
Performing an on-line resize of /dev/vg/lvtest to 786432 (4k) blocks.
The filesystem on /dev/vg/lvtest is now 786432 blocks long.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691726

Title:
  ext4 not able to online resize

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 691726] Re: ext4 not able to online resize

2010-12-17 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Apparently this was a SAN issue that didn't force a ro on this
filesystem. I noted the issues later and remounted this filesystem and
then it was able to resize online.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691726

Title:
  ext4 not able to online resize

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 335363] Re: e2fsprogs corrupts ext4 partitions when resizing

2010-12-17 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Apparently this was a SAN issue that didn't force a ro on this
filesystem.  I noted the issues later and remounted this filesystem and
then it was able to resize online.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335363

Title:
  e2fsprogs corrupts ext4 partitions when resizing

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 335363] Re: e2fsprogs corrupts ext4 partitions when resizing

2010-12-17 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Wrong bug, ignore comment.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335363

Title:
  e2fsprogs corrupts ext4 partitions when resizing

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs