[Bug 1976281] Re: snapd autopkgtest tests impossible combination of things

2022-06-01 Thread Michael Vogt
I uploaded snapd 2.55.5 as a SRU to all the relevant releases. They are in the "unapproved" queue right now, see e.g. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1_text=snapd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1974147] Re: [SRU] 2.56

2022-05-21 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: - placeholder + This is a new version of snapd. + + The changelog is available here + https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/blob/2.56/packaging/ubuntu-16.04/changelog, + the raw git changelog is available here: + https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/commits/2.56 (note that the

[Bug 1967084] Re: netplan dbus returns "false" in io.netplan.Netplan.Config.Set with networkd

2022-05-20 Thread Michael Vogt
The snapd test change is up in https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/11810 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967084 Title: netplan dbus returns "false" in

[Bug 1974147] [NEW] [SRU] 2.56

2022-05-19 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: placeholder ** Affects: snapd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - [SRU] 2.55 + [SRU] 2.56 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1969162] Re: bad interaction between snapd and update-notifier when snapd package is being upgraded

2022-04-27 Thread Michael Vogt
Fwiw, I tested this also for focal->jammy on my laptop (real machien) and it worked fine there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969162 Title: bad interaction between snapd and

[Bug 1969162] Re: bad interaction between snapd and update-notifier when snapd package is being upgraded

2022-04-25 Thread Michael Vogt
I ran the spread test in the snapd PR https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/11702 against this change in 21.10 and 22.04 and the restart behavior is correct: if snapd is upgraded from a version that does not yet use "dh_systemd --restart- after-upgrade" still keep running. ** Tags removed:

[Bug 1969162] Re: bad interaction between snapd and update-notifier when snapd package is being upgraded

2022-04-21 Thread Michael Vogt
It seems the above is not an issue on 21.10 at least. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969162 Title: bad interaction between snapd and update-notifier when snapd package is being

[Bug 1969162] Re: bad interaction between snapd and update-notifier when snapd package is being upgraded

2022-04-21 Thread Michael Vogt
There is one thing I noticed - when transitioning from "dh_systemd_start" to "dh_systemd_start --restart-after-upgrade" at least on 16.04 snapd.service is stopped in the old prerm but when the new postinst runs it calls "systemctl restart snapd" but that only restarts a service if it was not

[Bug 1969162] Re: bad interaction between snapd and update-notifier when snapd package is being upgraded

2022-04-21 Thread Michael Vogt
I uploaded a version of snapd with the changes from https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/11680 and https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/11287 to the my ppa:mvo/tmp for impish too. On a minimal impish system (created with autopkgtest-buildvm) I ran: $ sudo apt-add-repository ppa:mvo/tmp $

[Bug 1969162] Re: bad interaction between snapd and update-notifier when snapd package is being upgraded

2022-04-21 Thread Michael Vogt
On a minimal impish system (created with autopkgtest-buildvm) I ran: $ sudo apt install --no-install--recommends snapd update-notifier $ sudo snap install canonical-livepatch $ sudo apt-add-repository ppa:mvo/tmp $ sudo sed -i 's/impish/jammy/' /etc/apt/sources.list $ sudo sed -i 's/impish/jammy/'

[Bug 1969162] Re: bad interaction between snapd and update-notifier when snapd package is being upgraded

2022-04-21 Thread Michael Vogt
On a minimal impish system (created with autopkgtest-buildvm) I ran: $ sudo apt install --no-install--recommends snapd update-notifier $ sudo snap install canonical-livepatch $ sudo sed -i 's/impish/jammy/' /etc/apt/sources.list $ sudo apt update $ sudo apt full-upgrade -y and with that I can

[Bug 1969162] Re: bad interaction between snapd and update-notifier when snapd package is being upgraded

2022-04-21 Thread Michael Vogt
I uploaded a cherry pick of Albertos branch with the current jammy snapd plus the fix to https://launchpad.net/~mvo/+archive/ubuntu/tmp/+packages and will test once it's build in there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1969097] Re: connecting interfaces with a udev rule triggers return to gdm login screen

2022-04-14 Thread Michael Vogt
This could be the solution https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/commit/307c683f00e1711973139837992ca0f6f55314a5 ** Also affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1969097] Re: connecting interfaces with a udev rule triggers return to gdm login screen

2022-04-14 Thread Michael Vogt
I just tested it and and with the attached debdiff I can no longer reproduce the problem. ** Patch added: "debdiff with the fix" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/1969097/+attachment/5580697/+files/gdm3_42.0-1ubuntu3.debdiff ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New =>

[Bug 1792656] Re: snapd should depend on fuse for snapfuse

2022-04-12 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1792656 Title: snapd should depend on fuse for snapfuse To manage notifications

[Bug 1967084] Re: netplan dbus returns "false" in io.netplan.Netplan.Config.Set with networkd

2022-04-11 Thread Michael Vogt
** Summary changed: - netplan dbus returns "false" in io.netplan.Netplan.Config.Set + netplan dbus returns "false" in io.netplan.Netplan.Config.Set with networkd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1967084] Re: netplan dbus returns "false" in io.netplan.Netplan.Config.Set

2022-04-11 Thread Michael Vogt
The deeper reason appears to be: https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/tree/debian/patches/0006-cli- apply-give-some-extra-time-for-networkctl- reload.patch?h=applied/ubuntu/focal-updates#n25 It was a bit hard to find because for the "networkctl" calls in strace there was no

[Bug 1967084] Re: netplan dbus returns "false" in io.netplan.Netplan.Config.Set

2022-04-11 Thread Michael Vogt
I can also reproduce this on a minimal 20.04 VM image (created with autopkgtest-buildvm). Running the reproducer script above triggers the same "false" return so it seems to be related to the renderer. I was not able to reproduce it on my desktop with network-manager. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1967084] Re: netplan dbus returns "false" in io.netplan.Netplan.Config.Set

2022-04-11 Thread Michael Vogt
The (super naive) diff I used to increase the timeout: """ diff --git a/src/dbus.c b/src/dbus.c index 4d9b17a..78cdafe 100644 --- a/src/dbus.c +++ b/src/dbus.c @@ -512,8 +512,8 @@ method_try(sd_bus_message *m, void *userdata, sd_bus_error *ret_error) // LCOV_EXCL_STOP /* wait for

[Bug 1967084] Re: netplan dbus returns "false" in io.netplan.Netplan.Config.Set

2022-04-11 Thread Michael Vogt
Fwiw, it might be interessting to see where this time is actually spend - 6s is long for a relatively small config, maybe there is a bug hidding here somewhere that is just masked when we increase the timeout? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1967084] Re: netplan dbus returns "false" in io.netplan.Netplan.Config.Set

2022-04-11 Thread Michael Vogt
So it looks like the timeout in dbus.c that is hardcoded to 5s is the problem. I patched dbus.c to use a 15s timeout (values was arbitrary) and run the reproducer I get: # time ./repo.sh + cut -d" -f2 + grep object path + dbus-send --type=method_call --system --print-reply

[Bug 1967084] Re: netplan dbus returns "false" in io.netplan.Netplan.Config.Set

2022-04-11 Thread Michael Vogt
Here is a reproducer script """ #!/bin/sh set -ex objpath=$(dbus-send --type=method_call --system --print-reply --dest=io.netplan.Netplan /io/netplan/Netplan io.netplan.Netplan.Config | grep "object path" | cut -d'"' -f2) dbus-send --type=method_call --system --print-reply

[Bug 1967084] Re: netplan dbus returns "false" in io.netplan.Netplan.Config.Set

2022-04-11 Thread Michael Vogt
I managed to capture a debug log from netplan when run via the ddbus comments in #8. It was a bit tricky (bind mounted utils.py and set debug = True there) because netplan is coming from a RO location and no way to use the environment to enable debugging. Unfortunately the log gives me not many

[Bug 1967084] Re: netplan dbus returns "false" in io.netplan.Netplan.Config.Set

2022-04-08 Thread Michael Vogt
Fwiw I was able to reproduce this on core20 via: """ $ dbus-send --type=method_call --system --print-reply --dest=io.netplan.Netplan /io/netplan/Netplan io.netplan.Netplan.Config [got the /io/netplan/Netplan/config/4ZMNK1 path here] $ dbus-send --type=method_call --system --print-reply

[Bug 1967084] Re: netplan dbus returns "false" in io.netplan.Netplan.Config.Set

2022-04-08 Thread Michael Vogt
I was wrong and looked at old code. There is now a case where the dbus Try() returns "false". It was added in e19441c3 and has: """ +/* wait for the /run/netplan/netplan-try.ready stamp file to appear */ +guint poll_timeout = 500; +if (seconds > 0 && seconds < 5) +

[Bug 1967084] Re: netplan dbus returns "false" in io.netplan.Netplan.Config.Set

2022-04-08 Thread Michael Vogt
I'm sorry, my initial comment was wrong - we do have a "false" path in "Try()" now, I was looking at old code. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967084 Title: netplan dbus returns

[Bug 1967084] Re: netplan dbus returns "false" in io.netplan.Netplan.Config.Set

2022-04-08 Thread Michael Vogt
Sergio reported that he sees "systemd-networkd[804]: Could not set hostname: Permission denied" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967084 Title: netplan dbus returns "false" in

[Bug 1967084] Re: netplan dbus returns "false" in io.netplan.Netplan.Config.Set

2022-04-08 Thread Michael Vogt
It's pretty consistent now, here is a strace log from uc20 in google that shows the calls from dbus: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/hmjDQYYc9S/ ** Also affects: netplan Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1967084] Re: netplan dbus returns "false" in io.netplan.Netplan.Config.Set

2022-04-08 Thread Michael Vogt
We also observe this behavior now on UC20 systems that run with amd64, e.g. in this run: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/runs/5876437750?check_suite_focus=true The log looks like this: """ 2022-04-07T22:28:41.1746417Z Apr 07 22:28:33 apr072148-447340 snapd[3454]: netplan.go:122: DEBUG: using

[Bug 1967084] Re: netplan dbus returns "false" in io.netplan.Netplan.Config.Set

2022-03-30 Thread Michael Vogt
Hm, what is super mysterious is that AFAICT from reading https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/netplan.io/0.104-0ubuntu2~20.04.1/netplan.io_0.104-0ubuntu2~20.04.1.dsc there is nothing in `method_apply()` code path that could trigger this. I only see that `sd_bus_error_setf()`

[Bug 1967084] [NEW] netplan dbus returns "false" in io.netplan.Netplan.Config.Set

2022-03-30 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: As part of our snapd core integration testing we run the spread test for netplan on a UC20 PI device. On this device our test fails with: """ 2022-03-25 14:33:00 Error executing external:ubuntu-core-20-arm-32:tests/core/netplan-cfg (external:ubuntu-core-20-arm-32) : -

[Bug 1959375] Re: [SRU] Please support group manipulation with "extrausers"

2022-03-17 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959375

[Bug 1959912] Re: libmount: multiple user options are not supported

2022-02-03 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: Only a single user option (the first one) is taken into consideration when mounting a new disk regardless of the filesystem. # mount /dev/sdd1 /mnt/cruizer -onodev,ro,x-gdu.hide,x-gvfs-hide # findmnt --mtab /mnt/cruizer TARGET SOURCEFSTYPE OPTIONS

[Bug 1959570] [NEW] netplan crashes on UbuntuCore with the network-manager snap installed

2022-01-31 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: When using the netplan-dbus API on Ubuntu Core and the network-manager renderer the "netplan-dbus" appication will crash. To reproduce take a UC20 or UC22 system and run: ``` $ sudo snap set system system.network.netplan.network.bridges.br54.dhcp4=true ``` (which in effect

[Bug 1959375] Re: [SRU] Please support group manipulation with "extrausers"

2022-01-28 Thread Michael Vogt
** Patch added: "debdiff for the PPA jammy test upload" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1959375/+attachment/5557912/+files/shadow_4.8.1-2ubuntu2~ppa1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1959375] Re: [SRU] Please support group manipulation with "extrausers"

2022-01-28 Thread Michael Vogt
** Patch added: "Proposed (untested) patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1959375/+attachment/5557911/+files/shadow-lp1959375.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1959375] [NEW] [SRU] Please support group manipulation with "extrausers"

2022-01-28 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: Currently doing something like: sudo usermod -a -G snap_microk8s dbeamonte on a Ubuntu Core system will fail with usermod: /etc/group.15965: Read-only file system This is because the existing usermod patches to detect the extrausers file do not cover this case.

[Bug 1955137] Re: [SRU] 2.54

2022-01-12 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: - Placeholder + This is a new version of snapd. + + The changelog is available here + https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/blob/2.54.2/packaging/ubuntu-16.04/changelog, + the raw git changelog is available here: + https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/commits/2.54.2 (note that

[Bug 1955137] [NEW] [SRU] 2.54

2021-12-17 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: Placeholder ** Affects: snapd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955137 Title: [SRU] 2.54 To manage

[Bug 1946127] Re: [SRU] 2.53

2021-12-03 Thread Michael Vogt
** Also affects: snapd (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: snapd (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: snapd (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Released ** Also affects: snapd (Ubuntu Bionic)

[Bug 1949089] Re: systemd randomly fails to activate mount units in Ubuntu Core 18

2021-11-19 Thread Michael Vogt
Fwiw, it looks like the latest core18 edge build that includes https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/21.4-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 make the problem go away. It seems https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud- init/+bug/1946003 is what caused it. The old code had a udev rule that would call into the

[Bug 1949089] Re: systemd randomly fails to activate mount units in Ubuntu Core 18

2021-11-19 Thread Michael Vogt
I attached the /run/cloud-init and /var/log/cloud-init logs of the good/bad run - I looked over the diff via "diff -u <(cut -f 4- -d: /tmp/cloud-init-good-core18-r2206/cloud-init.log) <(cut -f 4- -d: /tmp/cloud-init-bad-core18-r2208/cloud-init.log)" but couldn't see anything standing out there

[Bug 1949089] Re: systemd randomly fails to activate mount units in Ubuntu Core 18

2021-11-19 Thread Michael Vogt
** Attachment added: "cloud-init logs for the "good" run" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1949089/+attachment/5542024/+files/cloud-init-good-core18-r2206.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1949089] Re: systemd randomly fails to activate mount units in Ubuntu Core 18

2021-11-19 Thread Michael Vogt
** Attachment added: "cloud-init logs for the "bad" run" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1949089/+attachment/5542025/+files/cloud-init-bad-core18-r2208.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1949089] Re: systemd randomly fails to activate mount units in Ubuntu Core 18

2021-11-18 Thread Michael Vogt
I spend a bit more time bisecting the various core18 snaps to see at what revision the failure started to become reproducible. Interestingly I found that it started with r2208 AFAICT. It's all a bit annoying because it's a race so I don't trust it 100% but the previous r2206 got 2 good runs in a

[Bug 1949089] Re: systemd randomly fails to activate mount units in Ubuntu Core 18

2021-11-18 Thread Michael Vogt
@Dan Thanks, this find about BindsTo is super interesting! It's not something that snapd writes out, it's curious where this comes from. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949089 Title:

[Bug 1949089] Re: systemd randomly fails to activate mount units in Ubuntu Core 18

2021-11-17 Thread Michael Vogt
I spend a bit of quality time with this bug today and it seems there is (also?) a kernel dimension to it. I ran the following: """ $ git status On branch tests-use-core18-from-gce Your branch is up to date with 'sergiocazzolato/tests-use-core18-from-gce'. $ git diff diff --git

[Bug 1949089] Re: systemd randomly fails to activate mount units in Ubuntu Core 18

2021-11-08 Thread Michael Vogt
About the question about Focal/hirsute/uc20 - we have not observed the issue there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949089 Title: systemd randomly fails to activate mount units in

[Bug 1949089] Re: systemd randomly fails to activate mount units in Ubuntu Core 18

2021-11-08 Thread Michael Vogt
Fwiw, the patch debian/lp1934147/0001-core-add-a-new-unit-method- catchup.patch is part of a fairly large patchset (https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/9200/commits) so maybe something is missing there? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1949089] Re: systemd randomly fails to activate mount units in Ubuntu Core 18

2021-11-08 Thread Michael Vogt
Just for the record, I also did another run with: https://storage.googleapis.com/snapd-spread- tests/snaps/core18_20211102_amd64.snap and that also fails right away: """ $ git status On branch tests-use-core18-from-gce Your branch is up to date with 'sergiocazzolato/tests-use-core18-from-gce'. $

[Bug 1949089] Re: systemd randomly fails to activate mount units in Ubuntu Core 18

2021-11-08 Thread Michael Vogt
Thanks Lukas for providing this revert of f0831ed2a03fcef582660be1c3b1a9f3e267e656. Using https://people.ubuntu.com/~slyon/uc18/core18_20211105_amd64.snap I can no longer reproduce the isue. To make it easier to reproduce what I did: """ $ git status On branch tests-use-core18-from-gce Your

[Bug 1949089] Re: systemd randomly fails to activate mount units in Ubuntu Core 18

2021-11-05 Thread Michael Vogt
We created a test PR that uses this core18 snap build in https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/11015 - we are still running tests but it seems the error is still there :-( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1942930] Re: Unset a subtree crashes

2021-10-12 Thread Michael Vogt
Hm, maybe I'm holding it wrong (again) but I'm not sure this is fully fixed: $ apt list netplan.io netplan.io/now 0.103-0ubuntu5~21.04.2 amd64 [installed,local] $ $ zcat /usr/share/doc/netplan.io/changelog.Debian.gz |head -n 6 netplan.io (0.103-0ubuntu5~21.04.2) hirsute; urgency=medium *

[Bug 1944004] Re: snapd.seeded.service never finishes on non-amd64

2021-10-08 Thread Michael Vogt
I distro patched the impish version of snapd with the fix from Ian and uploaded a new version: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/impish/+queue?queue_state=1_text=snapd with the fix as 2.53+21.10ubuntu1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1946127] [NEW] [SRU] 2.53

2021-10-05 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: This is a new version of snapd. The changelog is available here https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/blob/2.53/packaging/ubuntu-16.04/changelog, the raw git changelog is available here: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/commits/2.53 (note that the debian changelog is

[Bug 1505670] Re: "uncaptured python exception"

2021-09-30 Thread Michael Vogt
My apologizes that this totally was not on my radar. I applied the patch (thank you!) and moved the code from bzr to git, added a gbp.conf and pushed to GH for now (but maybe this really should go to salsa instead). I hope I will be able to release a new .16 release with these changes (and the

[Bug 1944988] Re: [FeatureFreezeException] snapd 2.53~pre1

2021-09-28 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944988 Title: [FeatureFreezeException] snapd 2.53~pre1 To manage

[Bug 1944988] Re: [FeatureFreezeException] snapd 2.53~pre1

2021-09-27 Thread Michael Vogt
This got accepted into impish now. ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944988 Title: [FeatureFreezeException] snapd

[Bug 1944988] Re: [FeatureFreezeException] snapd 2.53~pre1

2021-09-24 Thread Michael Vogt
The build log on impish: https://launchpad.net/~mvo/+archive/ubuntu/tmp/+build/22111395 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944988 Title: [FeatureFreezeException] snapd 2.53~pre1 To

[Bug 1944988] [NEW] [FeatureFreezeException] snapd 2.53~pre1

2021-09-24 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: Snapd needs to be updated to support cgroups v2 and also need to cater for some changes in libc. This is why we would like to ask for a feature freeze exception for snapd to upload 2.53~pre1 and eventually 2.53 into impish. Unfortunately it's very hard to backport this in

[Bug 1944004] Re: snapd.seeded.service never finishes on non-amd64

2021-09-24 Thread Michael Vogt
This is now uploaded to impish as snapd_2.53~pre1.git19b68f708_source.changes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944004 Title: snapd.seeded.service never finishes on non-amd64 To

[Bug 1944004] Re: snapd.seeded.service never finishes on non-amd64

2021-09-24 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944004 Title: snapd.seeded.service never finishes on non-amd64 To manage

[Bug 1935667] Re: snapd FTBFS when built with libfuse3-dev

2021-08-31 Thread Michael Vogt
This is merged now in: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10524 and will be part of the next release. ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1933827] Re: Symlink incorrectly installs to a sub-directory related to source name (github: 80)

2021-07-22 Thread Michael Vogt
** Also affects: zmk (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: zmk (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: zmk (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1935667] Re: snapd FTBFS when built with libfuse3-dev

2021-07-16 Thread Michael Vogt
Thanks for the patch! For us it's slightly more complicated because we want to make sure that snapd keeps building (ideally unchanged) back to 16.04. We will look a bit more. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1935667] Re: Please switch to fuse3

2021-07-13 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1935667 Title: Please

[Bug 1907056] Re: Please add meta/kernel.yaml

2021-05-10 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: Snapd will soon support to have DTBs in the kernel snap that are automatically installed on kernel refreshes. To support this, please add the following file to the pi-kernel: This should also add "assumes: [kernel-assets]" to the meta/snap.yaml so that the

[Bug 1926005] [NEW] [SRU] 2.50

2021-04-24 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: This is a new version of snapd. The changelog is available here https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/blob/2.50/packaging/ubuntu-16.04/changelog, the raw git changelog is available here: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/commits/2.50 (note that the debian changelog is

[Bug 1920107] Re: Failed messages of sd-umoun show with reboot/shutdown

2021-04-09 Thread Michael Vogt
** Package changed: snapd (Ubuntu) => systemd (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920107 Title: Failed messages of sd-umoun show with reboot/shutdown To manage notifications

[Bug 1920107] Re: Failed messages of sd-umoun show with reboot/shutdown

2021-04-09 Thread Michael Vogt
** Also affects: snapd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920107 Title: Failed messages of sd-umoun show with reboot/shutdown To

[Bug 1922293] Re: Snaps appear broken on 21.04 Beta with ZFS

2021-04-06 Thread Michael Vogt
[from-irc] mvo: hey! There are 2 things here: - the zfs generator is currently broken in the default setup due to OpenZFS 2.0 default layout. ubiquity in unapproved since this morning is fixing this (people using our default setup will not be impacted by the bug then) - then, for people

[Bug 1922293] Re: Snaps appear broken on 21.04 Beta with ZFS

2021-04-06 Thread Michael Vogt
This looks a lot like an issue with zfs-linux to me (and *maybe* systemd, not sure about this). The issue is that the snaps are on /var/lib/snapd/snaps and snapd writes mount units into /etc/systemd/system/ so that the snaps are mounted under /snap//. Looking at a zfs-linux system and the

[Bug 1922293] Re: Snaps appear broken on 21.04 Beta with ZFS

2021-04-06 Thread Michael Vogt
** Also affects: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922293 Title: Snaps appear broken on 21.04 Beta with ZFS To manage

[Bug 1907056] Re: Please add meta/kernel.yaml

2021-04-06 Thread Michael Vogt
Fwiw, the dtbs/ dir: $ ls pi-kernel-armhf-rev266/dtbs/ bcm2708-rpi-b.dtb bcm2710-rpi-cm3.dtb bcm2835-rpi-zero.dtb bcm2708-rpi-b-plus.dtbbcm2711-rpi-400.dtb bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dtb bcm2708-rpi-b-rev1.dtbbcm2711-rpi-4-b.dtb bcm2836-rpi-2-b.dtb bcm2708-rpi-cm.dtb

[Bug 1907056] Re: Please add meta/kernel.yaml

2021-04-06 Thread Michael Vogt
The kernel wants to use: ``` assets: pidtbs: update: true content: - dtbs/ ``` instead of the one suggested above because the pi-kernel on arm64 and armhf have different dtbs/ dir layout: arm64: dtbs/broadcom/*.dtb, dtbs/overlays armhf: dtbs/*.dtb, dtbs/overlays So the armhf has

[Bug 1920754] Re: FTBFS and autopkgtest failure in hirsute

2021-03-24 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920754 Title: FTBFS and autopkgtest failure in hirsute To manage

[Bug 1636927] Re: upgrading kernel/gadget snap on Pi3 did not update dtb files

2021-03-09 Thread Michael Vogt
This is in progress now in the snapd and ubuntu-image. This will also need changes in the gadget/kernel that are tracked here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1907056 ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Also affects: ubuntu-image (Ubuntu) Importance:

[Bug 1907056] Re: Please add meta/kernel.yaml

2021-03-04 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: Snapd will soon support to have DTBs in the kernel snap that are automatically installed on kernel refreshes. To support this, please add the following file to the pi-kernel: - WE ALSO NEED TO UPDATE THE ASSUMES in the meta/snap.yaml, diff will - follow shortly. +

[Bug 1907056] Re: Please add meta/kernel.yaml

2021-03-04 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: Snapd will soon support to have DTBs in the kernel snap that are automatically installed on kernel refreshes. To support this, please add the following file to the pi-kernel: + + WE ALSO NEED TO UPDATE THE ASSUMES in the meta/snap.yaml, diff will + follow shortly.

[Bug 1915156] Re: sudoers file keeps being tracked as part of snapd

2021-03-01 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Vogt (mvo) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

[Bug 1915250] Re: buildd file owner/group for shared libraries

2021-02-15 Thread Michael Vogt
Fwiw, mysql-8.0 is also affected: $ dpkg -c libmysqlclient21_8.0.23-3_amd64.deb|grep buildd drwxr-xr-x buildd/buildd 0 2021-02-11 10:32 ./ [many more] And some more: $ dpkg -c libqt5xdg3_3.6.0-1ubuntu2_amd64.deb |grep buildd -rw-r--r-- buildd/buildd 268440 2021-02-11 21:58

[Bug 1878541] Re: Grub fails to load kernel from squashfs if mem < 1500mb

2021-02-15 Thread Michael Vogt
This is fixed now. ** Changed in: snapd Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878541 Title: Grub fails to load kernel from squashfs if mem <

[Bug 1915248] [NEW] [SRU] 2.49

2021-02-10 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: This is a new version of snapd. The changelog is available here https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/blob/2.49/packaging/ubuntu-16.04/changelog, the raw git changelog is available here: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/commits/2.49 (note that the debian changelog is

[Bug 1907056] Re: Please add meta/kernel.yaml

2021-02-05 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: Snapd will soon support to have DTBs in the kernel snap that are automatically installed on kernel refreshes. To support this, please add the following file to the pi-kernel: $ cat meta/kernel.yaml assets:   pidtbs: update: true content: -

[Bug 1907056] Re: Please add meta/kernel.yaml

2021-02-04 Thread Michael Vogt
** Also affects: snapd Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907056 Title: Please add meta/kernel.yaml To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1850667] Re: cgroup v2 is not fully supported yet, proceeding with partial confinement

2021-01-18 Thread Michael Vogt
After discussing this we decided that we will leave cgroups v1 support for 21.04 because the snapd team will not be able to port all features to v2 in time. But early in the 21.10 cycle v1 is turned off and snapd needs to be ported to full v2 support. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1850667] Re: cgroup v2 is not fully supported yet, proceeding with partial confinement

2021-01-04 Thread Michael Vogt
@rbalint Do you have a timeline when you plan this? The changes required make this most likely something we can only tackle during the 21.10 cycle :/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1850667] Re: cgroup v2 is not fully supported yet, proceeding with partial confinement

2021-01-04 Thread Michael Vogt
@rbalint Thanks for this heads up. Unfortunately we are not ready for cgroups v2. Snapd is working on v2 systems but a lot of the functionality is not ported. AIUI it requires quite a bit of work on our side and the two are quite different :/ -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1906690] Re: [SRU] 2.48.2

2020-12-15 Thread Michael Vogt
** Summary changed: - [SRU] 2.48.1 + [SRU] 2.48.2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906690 Title: [SRU] 2.48.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1907056] Re: Please add meta/kernel.yaml

2020-12-09 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: Snapd will soon support to have DTBs in the kernel snap that are automatically installed on kernel refreshes. To support this, please add the following file to the pi-kernel: $ cat meta/kernel.yaml assets:   pidtbs: update: true content: - -

[Bug 1907056] Re: Please add meta/kernel.yaml

2020-12-09 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: Snapd will soon support to have DTBs in the kernel snap that are automatically installed on kernel refreshes. To support this, please add the following file to the pi-kernel: $ cat meta/kernel.yaml assets: -   pi-dtbs: +   pidtbs: update: true

[Bug 1907056] Re: Please add meta/kernel.yaml

2020-12-09 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: Snapd will soon support to have DTBs in the kernel snap that are automatically installed on kernel refreshes. To support this, please add the following file to the pi-kernel: $ cat meta/kernel.yaml assets:   pi-dtbs: update: true content: - -

[Bug 1907056] Re: Please add meta/kernel.yaml

2020-12-07 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: Snapd will soon support to have DTBs in the kernel snap that are automatically installed on kernel refreshes. To support this, please add the following file to the pi-kernel: $ cat meta/kernel.yaml assets: - pi-dtbs: - update: true - content: - -

[Bug 1907056] [NEW] Please add meta/kernel.yaml

2020-12-07 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: Snapd will soon support to have DTBs in the kernel snap that are automatically installed on kernel refreshes. To support this, please add the following file to the pi-kernel: $ cat meta/kernel.yaml assets: pi-dtbs: update: true content: - dtbs This will allow

[Bug 1906690] [NEW] [SRU] 2.48.1

2020-12-03 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: placeholder ** Affects: snapd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906690 Title: [SRU] 2.48.1 To manage

[Bug 1904098] Re: [SRU] 2.48

2020-11-23 Thread Michael Vogt
The travis runs are currently not active, we move to GH actions. The 2.48 release test run is visible at https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9685/checks?check_run_id=1443415116 Some isolated test failures on centos/suse but Ubuntu is all green. One small issue on ubuntu-core-20 with the fsck

[Bug 1905272] Re: Can't get h/w video acceleration on rpi4

2020-11-23 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: snapd Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905272 Title: Can't get h/w video acceleration on rpi4 To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1903054] Re: [SRU] Please merge u-boot 2020.10+dfsg-1 from Debian unstable

2020-11-17 Thread Michael Vogt
** Also affects: u-boot (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: u-boot (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: u-boot (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: u-boot (Ubuntu Bionic)

[Bug 1904098] [NEW] [SRU] 2.48

2020-11-12 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: This is a new version of snapd. The changelog is available here https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/blob/2.48/packaging/ubuntu-16.04/changelog, the raw git changelog is available here: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/commits/2.48 (note that the debian changelog is

[Bug 1903054] Re: Please merge u-boot 2020.10+dfsg-1 from Debian unstable

2020-11-09 Thread Michael Vogt
Thanks for this! I sponsored the upload, happy to sponsor more! ** Changed in: u-boot (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903054 Title:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >