[Bug 1870932] Re: ssh-add -L incorrectly reports a failure when successfully retrieving an empty identity list

2020-04-05 Thread Mike Mol
This did eventually work around my problem: https://gist.github.com/mikemol/084759d9bbbaf818ecbb0688d4cc0f5c I suppose the difference between the exit code of 1 and 2 was sufficiently useful. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub

[Bug 1870932] Re: ssh-add -L incorrectly reports a failure when successfully retrieving an empty identity list

2020-04-05 Thread Mike Mol
I can't see a way to close the bug report. Feel free to close if desired. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870932 Title: ssh-add -L incorrectly reports a failure when successfully retr

[Bug 1870932] [NEW] ssh-add -L incorrectly reports a failure when successfully retrieving an empty identity list

2020-04-05 Thread Mike Mol
Public bug reported: Example of behavior: ``` mikemol@kaylee:~$ ssh-add -L The agent has no identities. mikemol@kaylee:~$ echo $? 1 mikemol@kaylee:~$ ``` I expected an exit code of 0 if the agent was running. I don't need the list of identities; I'm trying to validate that the agent is running,

[Bug 1479045] Re: E: Method gave invalid 103 Redirect message

2015-10-22 Thread Mike Mol
I just slammed into this while trying to upgrade from 15.04 to 15.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479045 Title: E: Method gave invalid 103 Redirect message To manage notification

Re: [Bug 1273955] Re: Could not run Sparql query: 1.182: syntax error, unexpected character

2014-07-09 Thread Mike Mol
This was while using libtracker on Ubuntu 13.10, IIRC. I don't remember the search tool; something very simple and basic, as I don't typically use desktop environments. I don't remember much more, but when I dug into it I remember getting the impression it was likely because of the API's lack of qu

[Bug 1273955] [NEW] Could not run Sparql query: 1.182: syntax error, unexpected character

2014-01-28 Thread Mike Mol
Public bug reported: I'm unable to select various documents. For example, I have the Debian Administrator's Handbook in my library. If I use tracker-needle to search for "samba", this shows up in the result set. *However*, if I click on this result, a message box appears: Could not retrieve tag

[Bug 1271569] [NEW] Xournal only records first stroke of touchscreen input

2014-01-22 Thread Mike Mol
Public bug reported: If I open xournal and draw on the screen, my first stroke is recorded fine. If I attempt a second stroke, only the initial contact point is recorded, but no further points are recorded in the stroke. If I *then* click on the "Pen" tool again, the scenario resets; I can recor

[Bug 1264322] Re: PGP / GPG decryption in Evolution is broken

2013-12-26 Thread Mike Mol
$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 13.10 Release:13.10 $ apt-cache policy evolution* python-evolution: Installed: (none) Candidate: (none) Version table: evolution: Installed: 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 0 500 http:/

[Bug 1264322] Re: PGP / GPG decryption in Evolution is broken

2013-12-26 Thread Mike Mol
OK, I tried the ubuntu-bug approach. It brought up this bug as a candidate for something I was trying to report. Of course it was, so I told it to subscribe me. It doesn't look like it added any data, though. Do you want me to file a new bug report? The document you linked me to does not say how t

[Bug 1264322] [NEW] PGP/GPG decryption in Evolution is broken

2013-12-26 Thread Mike Mol
Public bug reported: An encrypted email received with with Evolution cannot be decrypted. On the console is emitted the line: (evolution:3566): libeutil-WARNING **: Keyring key is unusable: no user or host name This issue was fixed upstream with Evolution 3.8.5, per this thread: http://forums.f

[Bug 886410] Re: accept_ra_rtr_pref ignored or non-functional

2011-11-04 Thread Mike Mol
Actually, dcbw may have found a bug in NM that prevented us from seeing the notifications of routes becoming available, and asked that I move the bug over to NM. Now to figure out how... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 886410] Re: accept_ra_rtr_pref ignored or non-functional

2011-11-04 Thread Mike Mol
** Attachment added: "Conversation from #nm on irc.freenode.net as we tried tracking the issue down." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/886410/+attachment/2585844/+files/nm.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib

[Bug 886410] Re: accept_ra_rtr_pref ignored or non-functional

2011-11-04 Thread Mike Mol
radvd.conf ** Attachment added: "radvd.conf" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/886410/+attachment/2585843/+files/radvd.conf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886410

[Bug 886410] Re: accept_ra_rtr_pref ignored or non-functional

2011-11-04 Thread Mike Mol
** Attachment added: "Syslog stretch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886410/+attachment/2585821/+files/netlog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886410 Title: accept_ra_rtr_pref i

[Bug 886410] [NEW] accept_ra_rtr_pref ignored or non-functional

2011-11-04 Thread Mike Mol
Public bug reported: On my network, I broadcast additional routes via IPv6 RAs. These routes do not appear to be picked up by the kernel, even though /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/accept_ra_rtr_pref is set to '1' I ran into this issue because I'm also using gogoc to give my laptop a globally unique

[Bug 809918] Re: /etc/gdm/gdm.schemas ignored in favor of /usr/share/gdm/gdm.schemas

2011-07-13 Thread Mike Mol
Ah, I misread the latter portion of your comment. gconf-schemas it is, then. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809918 Title: /etc/gdm/gdm.schemas ignored in favor of /usr/share/gdm/gdm.s

[Bug 809918] Re: /etc/gdm/gdm.schemas ignored in favor of /usr/share/gdm/gdm.schemas

2011-07-13 Thread Mike Mol
I'll look at the gconf docs and get things working the 'proper' way for an individual user with user-supplied settings, but I dispute that there isn't a bug here; settings under /etc should override settings in /usr/share. Even if the .schemas file is designed for configuring defaults settings. /e

[Bug 809918] [NEW] /etc/gdm/gdm.schemas ignored in favor of /usr/share/gdm/gdm.schemas

2011-07-13 Thread Mike Mol
Public bug reported: Ubuntu release: 11.04 Package: gdm gdm: Installed: 2.32.1-0ubuntu3.2 Candidate: 2.32.1-0ubuntu3.2 Version table: *** 2.32.1-0ubuntu3.2 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-updates/main i386 Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ na

[Bug 589783] Re: SATA failure, killed RAID0.

2010-06-04 Thread Mike Mol
I have two three-disk software-RAID setups. One set of three 1.5TBs in RAID5, one set of three 1TBs in RAID0. The RAID5 is on the motherboard host controller, the RAID0 is on the Marvell controller card. ext4 filesystems on both. I was doing an rsync dry run from the RAID0 to the RAID5 array when r

[Bug 589783] Re: SATA failure, killed RAID0.

2010-06-04 Thread Mike Mol
version signature attachment ** Attachment added: "version.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49672824/version.log -- SATA failure, killed RAID0. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 589783] Re: SATA failure, killed RAID0.

2010-06-04 Thread Mike Mol
dmesg attachment ** Attachment added: "dmesg.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49672792/dmesg.log -- SATA failure, killed RAID0. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 589783] Re: SATA failure, killed RAID0.

2010-06-04 Thread Mike Mol
lspci -vnvn attachment ** Attachment added: "lspci-vnvn.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49672787/lspci-vnvn.log -- SATA failure, killed RAID0. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 589783] Re: SATA failure, killed RAID0.

2010-06-04 Thread Mike Mol
** Attachment added: "uname.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49672750/uname.log ** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49672469/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: "AplayDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49672470/AplayDevices.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 589783] [NEW] SATA failure, killed RAID0.

2010-06-04 Thread Mike Mol
Public bug reported: Jun 4 11:48:57 dodo kernel: [ 1489.301688] [ cut here ] Jun 4 11:48:57 dodo kernel: [ 1489.301702] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1208 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x59e/0x620() Jun 4 11:48:57 dodo kernel: [ 1489.301707] Hardwa

[Bug 546545] Re: SIP implementation incompatible with firewall configuration.

2010-03-24 Thread Mike Mol
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41891275/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41891276/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41891277/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachm

[Bug 546545] [NEW] SIP implementation incompatible with firewall configuration.

2010-03-24 Thread Mike Mol
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ekiga SIP is strictly signaling, and the audio/video component of the calls occurs as part of an arranged connection. When negotiating a port for audio (and possibly video; I didn't test that) media, Ekiga does not choose a consistent, configurable or pre

[Bug 267913] Re: hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj

2009-03-22 Thread Mike Mol
I just noticed this in my dmesg as well: [ 38.792010] ath0: no IPv6 routers present [ 3001.069882] CE: hpet increasing min_delta_ns to 15000 nsec [66541.465330] hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. (Those three lines follow each other in the

[Bug 220396] Re: Contents-arch.gz not found

2008-09-13 Thread Mike Mol
Also happening to me, using official hardy archive [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15:26:34 $ sudo apt-file update Can't get http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/dists/hardy/Contents-amd64.gz -- Contents-arch.gz not found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220396 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 269733] Re: mediatomb SIGSEGV when requesting folder listing with PS3 while indexing

2008-09-13 Thread Mike Mol
** Attachment added: "gdb-mediatomb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17573933/gdb-mediatomb.txt -- mediatomb SIGSEGV when requesting folder listing with PS3 while indexing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 269733] [NEW] mediatomb SIGSEGV when requesting folder listing with PS3 while indexing

2008-09-13 Thread Mike Mol
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mediatomb-common While mediatomb was indexing content in a directory tree containing CIFS mount points, I tried enumerating the root folder using my PS3, and mediatomb SIGSEGV'd. This is not a duplicate of Bug 196120, as that bug is marked "fixed in 0.11

[Bug 220819] Re: exim4 cannot be removed, if stopped

2008-08-17 Thread Mike Mol
I've seen this bug as well, though in my case exim4 was refusing to start because it was misconfigured. Since exim4 wasn't started, I couldn't install an mta that I knew how to configure until I fixed exim4's configuration. A vexing situation... -- exim4 cannot be removed, if stopped https://bu

[Bug 183596] Re: mysqld-safe consumes 100% cpu

2008-01-17 Thread Mike Mol
This is happening on Gutsy, too. ** Attachment added: "top screenshot" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11423508/mysqld_safe-top.png -- mysqld-safe consumes 100% cpu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183596 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bu