[Bug 1877038]
This is also affecting Amazon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877038 Title: [upstream] Firefox lacks FIDO2 support with Yubikeys To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1877038/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47751]
This doesn't happen with our new Marquee implementation. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/47751 Title: Dos problem with marquee tag To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/47751/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1854363]
This broke LDAP autoconfig. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854363 Title: [upstream] ReferenceError: processLDAPValues is not defined To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1854363/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 541951]
I was only referring to the use of user.js for enterprise. I do understand that it's worthwhile to have locking of prefs in JS file for Firefox purposes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541951 Title: Firefox 3.6 does not honour lockPref To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/541951/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 541951]
user.js was never intended to be an enterprise level feature for configuration of Firefox. I don't recommend using it for that. For enterprise configuration, we have provided Autoconfig since day one, and we are working on a better solution involving JSON, GPO and possibly authors. Our goal is to move away from the various hack solutions that folks have created in order to configure Firefox. What specific customizations are you looking to do with Firefox? You can see the policies we are working on here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1428920 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541951 Title: Firefox 3.6 does not honour lockPref To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/541951/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 541951]
(In reply to Mike Hommey (VAC: 31 Dec - 11 Jan) [:glandium] from comment #40) > (In reply to Mike Kaply [:mkaply] from comment #39) > > Oddly, this document: > > > > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Preferences/ > > A_brief_guide_to_Mozilla_preferences > > > > Says we already support lockPref in JS files? > > It says: "All preferences files may call pref(), user_pref() and > sticky_pref(), while the config file in addition may call lockPref()." > which is about autoconf. You'd think I would have noticed that. I really don't like a document that combines the two. pref behaves differently on both, user_pref doesn't work in autoconfig and sticky_pref doesn't work in autoconfig. This shouldn't reference autoconfig at all. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541951 Title: Firefox 3.6 does not honour lockPref To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/541951/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 541951]
To expound on what :glandium said:
Extensions can lock preferences with:
Components.classes["@mozilla.org/preferences-service;1"]
.getService(Components.interfaces.nsIPrefService)
.getBranch(null)
.lockPref("name_of_pref");
Locking a preference doesn't affect the value, it just locks the
preference to the user. Obviously any extension could unlock a
preference and do what they want with that value.
Locking preferences is not for the benefit of preventing other
extensions from messing with things, it's to keep users from messing
with things.
Oddly, this document:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-
US/docs/Mozilla/Preferences/A_brief_guide_to_Mozilla_preferences
Says we already support lockPref in JS files?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541951
Title:
Firefox 3.6 does not honour lockPref
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/541951/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 541951]
> Looking forward to see the patch landed as we use it at Fedora. For what purpose? user.js shouldn't be used for anything mission critical at all. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541951 Title: Firefox 3.6 does not honour lockPref To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/541951/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 541951]
It's not the same syntax, that's my point. pref() in a prefs.js file is NOT the same as pref() in an AutoConfig.js file. pref() in prefs.js sets the default pref, defaultPref() in an Autoconfig sets a default pref. user_pref() in prefs.js sets a user pref, pref() in an AutoConfig file sets a user preference. So what you're doing is making it look like autoconfig.js and prefs.js use the same syntax, when they do not. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541951 Title: Firefox 3.6 does not honour lockPref To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/541951/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 541951]
You didn't address my comments. I really don't want it being called lockPref. That will confuse it with the autoconfig "lockPref" function. There is already enough confusion with pref() -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541951 Title: Firefox 3.6 does not honour lockPref To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/541951/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623844]
I was only referring to the use of user.js for enterprise. I do understand that it's worthwhile to have locking of prefs in JS file for Firefox purposes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623844 Title: lockpref not honored in /etc/thunderbird/pref/thunderbird.js To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/623844/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623844]
It's not the same syntax, that's my point. pref() in a prefs.js file is NOT the same as pref() in an AutoConfig.js file. pref() in prefs.js sets the default pref, defaultPref() in an Autoconfig sets a default pref. user_pref() in prefs.js sets a user pref, pref() in an AutoConfig file sets a user preference. So what you're doing is making it look like autoconfig.js and prefs.js use the same syntax, when they do not. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623844 Title: lockpref not honored in /etc/thunderbird/pref/thunderbird.js To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/623844/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623844]
user.js was never intended to be an enterprise level feature for configuration of Firefox. I don't recommend using it for that. For enterprise configuration, we have provided Autoconfig since day one, and we are working on a better solution involving JSON, GPO and possibly authors. Our goal is to move away from the various hack solutions that folks have created in order to configure Firefox. What specific customizations are you looking to do with Firefox? You can see the policies we are working on here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1428920 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623844 Title: lockpref not honored in /etc/thunderbird/pref/thunderbird.js To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/623844/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623844]
(In reply to Mike Hommey (VAC: 31 Dec - 11 Jan) [:glandium] from comment #40) > (In reply to Mike Kaply [:mkaply] from comment #39) > > Oddly, this document: > > > > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Preferences/ > > A_brief_guide_to_Mozilla_preferences > > > > Says we already support lockPref in JS files? > > It says: "All preferences files may call pref(), user_pref() and > sticky_pref(), while the config file in addition may call lockPref()." > which is about autoconf. You'd think I would have noticed that. I really don't like a document that combines the two. pref behaves differently on both, user_pref doesn't work in autoconfig and sticky_pref doesn't work in autoconfig. This shouldn't reference autoconfig at all. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623844 Title: lockpref not honored in /etc/thunderbird/pref/thunderbird.js To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/623844/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623844]
> Looking forward to see the patch landed as we use it at Fedora. For what purpose? user.js shouldn't be used for anything mission critical at all. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623844 Title: lockpref not honored in /etc/thunderbird/pref/thunderbird.js To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/623844/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623844]
You didn't address my comments. I really don't want it being called lockPref. That will confuse it with the autoconfig "lockPref" function. There is already enough confusion with pref() -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623844 Title: lockpref not honored in /etc/thunderbird/pref/thunderbird.js To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/623844/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623844]
To expound on what :glandium said:
Extensions can lock preferences with:
Components.classes["@mozilla.org/preferences-service;1"]
.getService(Components.interfaces.nsIPrefService)
.getBranch(null)
.lockPref("name_of_pref");
Locking a preference doesn't affect the value, it just locks the
preference to the user. Obviously any extension could unlock a
preference and do what they want with that value.
Locking preferences is not for the benefit of preventing other
extensions from messing with things, it's to keep users from messing
with things.
Oddly, this document:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-
US/docs/Mozilla/Preferences/A_brief_guide_to_Mozilla_preferences
Says we already support lockPref in JS files?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623844
Title:
lockpref not honored in /etc/thunderbird/pref/thunderbird.js
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/623844/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 221265]
There are three additional preferences that when set and locked disable those buttons. It's not tied to the locking of the homepage: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/components/preferences/main.xul#76 pref.browser.homepage.disable_button.current_page pref.browser.homepage.disable_button.bookmark_page pref.browser.homepage.disable_button.restore_default If you set these three preferences to true and then lock the preferences, they will be disabled. If you want to prevent the changes of the proxy preferences, you need to lock network.proxy.type as well. I'm going to mark this bug as INVALID. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221265 Title: Can't lock preferences in Firefox 3.0 Beta 5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/221265/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 541951]
This is a fly by night review. I don't think it should be lockPref like autoconfig. With autoconfig, it's a function call. With the default pref files, you're specifying a preference. so: locked_pref(foo, bar) makes more sense it that context (the same as user_pref) Looking through the code, it looks like you've assumed that if a pref is locked, it becomes a default as well, is that correct? The code looks good to me, but I'm not the right person to do this. I think this is a good solution to the problem you are seeing and makes it a lot easier for enterprises to lock prefs, so this would be a good thing to have. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541951 Title: Firefox 3.6 does not honour lockPref To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/541951/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623844]
This is a fly by night review. I don't think it should be lockPref like autoconfig. With autoconfig, it's a function call. With the default pref files, you're specifying a preference. so: locked_pref(foo, bar) makes more sense it that context (the same as user_pref) Looking through the code, it looks like you've assumed that if a pref is locked, it becomes a default as well, is that correct? The code looks good to me, but I'm not the right person to do this. I think this is a good solution to the problem you are seeing and makes it a lot easier for enterprises to lock prefs, so this would be a good thing to have. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623844 Title: lockpref not honored in /etc/thunderbird/pref/thunderbird.js To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/623844/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
