[Bug 1902366] Re: Cannot upgrade 18.04 to 20.04

2021-05-09 Thread Nevyn
Ran the following script to find any packages that had been installed
from other sources and removed them all.


#!/bin/sh

# Print packages installed from different origins.
# Exclude standard Ubuntu repositories.

grep -H '^Origin:' /var/lib/apt/lists/*Release | grep -v ' Ubuntu$' | sort -u \
| while read -r line; do
origin=${line#* }
echo $origin:

list=${line%%:*}
sed -rn 's/^Package: (.*)$/\1/p' ${list%_*Release}*Packages | sort -u \
| xargs -r dpkg -l 2>/dev/null | grep '^.i '
echo
 done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902366

Title:
  Cannot upgrade 18.04 to 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1902366/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1550124] Re: package libjpeg-progs 8c-2ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/rdjpgcom', which is also in package libjpeg-turbo-progs 1.4.2-0ubuntu1

2016-04-23 Thread Nevyn
This should provide you with a quick fix. It makes a couple of
assumptions such as, that you've attempted to install libjpeg-progs and
it's failed. Basically it goes and grabs the package from your cache,
extracts out the package, changes the control file to allow it to
resolve the conflict and changes the version number (appends this bug
report number to it), bundles it back up into a package and then
installs the package. It's also untested and assumes you don't have
packages in your home folder (libjpeg-progs).

#!/bin/bash
mkdir ~/libjpeg-progs
cp /var/cache/apt/archives/libjpeg-progs* ~/libjpeg-progs
cd ~/libjpeg-progs
ar x libjpeg-progs*.deb
rm libjpeg-progs*.deb debian-binary
tar xvf data.tar.* && rm data.tar.*
tar xvf control.tar.* --directory DEBIAN && rm control.tar.*
cd DEBIAN
if [ -z "$( grep "^Replaces:" control )" ] ; then
  sed '/^Version:/ iReplaces: libjpeg-turbo-progs' control -i
else
  sed 's/\(^Replaces: .*\)/\1, libjpeg-turbo-progs/' control -i
fi
sed 's/\(^Version: .*\)/\1-1550124/' control -i
cd ~
dpkg -b libjpeg-progs .
sudo dpkg -i libjpeg-progs*.deb

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550124

Title:
  package libjpeg-progs 8c-2ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: trying to
  overwrite '/usr/bin/rdjpgcom', which is also in package libjpeg-turbo-
  progs 1.4.2-0ubuntu1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libjpeg8-empty/+bug/1550124/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 577919] Re: chromium-browser fails to start (guest account, OpenVZ): Failed to move to new PID namespace: Operation not permitted

2013-04-24 Thread Nevyn
Long term support?!? Be nice for this fix to be applied to Precise
Will probably end up using jeremiejig's fix for the time being (1,600
machines. Don't want to have to remove apparmor).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577919

Title:
  chromium-browser fails to start (guest account, OpenVZ): Failed to
  move to new PID namespace: Operation not permitted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/chromium-browser/+bug/577919/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 981972] Re: Looking Glass broken on Gnome-Shell 3.4.0-0ubuntu3 update

2012-04-15 Thread Nevyn
Have noticed that the case has changed for Global - it is now global.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981972

Title:
  Looking Glass broken on Gnome-Shell 3.4.0-0ubuntu3 update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/981972/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 981972] Re: Looking Glass broken on Gnome-Shell 3.4.0-0ubuntu3 update

2012-04-15 Thread Nevyn
Got a new version of Gnome-Shell today (3.4.0-0ubuntu2). Issues have
changed. (Got to love moving targets).

Now the error pane isn't updating in real time when logging from
extension but can work around that easily enough. Can safely close this
bug report...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981972

Title:
  Looking Glass broken on Gnome-Shell 3.4.0-0ubuntu3 update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/981972/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 981972] [NEW] Looking Glass broken on Gnome-Shell 3.4.0-0ubuntu3 update

2012-04-14 Thread Nevyn
Public bug reported:

Definition of Error:
During the latest update I found that looking glass is broken for extensions.

Symptoms:
Will only show errors when extension loads up.
Use of Global (e.g. Global.log) causes extension to lock up (and no messages in 
looking glass).
No other messages from extension (about errors etc.) show up in looking glass - 
neither in the extensions pane (which didn't seem to work prior to the update) 
or the errors pane.

Ubuntu Version:
Description:Ubuntu precise (development branch)
Release:12.04

** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981972

Title:
  Looking Glass broken on Gnome-Shell 3.4.0-0ubuntu3 update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/981972/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 689258] Re: Microphone does not work in Aus eeePC 1001px!

2012-03-26 Thread Nevyn
Have been using a kernel backport. Was using alsa-backports but found
the noise levels far too high.

https://launchpad.net/~kernel-ppa/+archive/ppa

Am currently using 3.0.0-14 but about to update it as I am having some
isolated wireless issues.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689258

Title:
  Microphone does not work in Aus eeePC 1001px!

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/689258/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 580183] Re: asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

2011-05-10 Thread Nevyn
Have got the internal microphone working a treat with 2.6.32-31. Needed
to upgrade to alsa 1.0.24. Have attached my first packaging attempt.
Haven't quite deployed yet - looking to tweak volume settings.

Still haven't gotten the headphone/microphone port working properly
though I believe (unconfirmed) headphones at the very least work.

Unfortunately, this also means I'm going to have to compile for each
kernel release. Don't want to use dkms in this case as the compile time
is fairly high.

So linux-image-2.6.32-31 is required. This is for Lucid. Could solve
other sound card issues? Wasn't discriminant when compiling.

** Attachment added: alsa.deb
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/580183/+attachment/2122437/+files/alsa.deb

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580183

Title:
  asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 580183] Re: asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

2011-03-13 Thread Nevyn
@EdwardoiD

Can we have more details? What works? I did manage to get the internal
microphone going but does external work as well? And how are the noise
levels? I haven't been able to get below jet engine type noise.

Personally I'd like to not have to maintain a kernel if I can possibly
avoid it (I've now got around 500 machines in the wild).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580183

Title:
  asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 19096] Re: Alsaconf missing in Ubuntu alsa packages!

2011-03-03 Thread Nevyn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 29597 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/29597

This is rather a lame approach. Users aren't given the choice?
Seriously?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19096

Title:
  Alsaconf missing in Ubuntu alsa packages!

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 580183] Re: asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

2011-01-15 Thread Nevyn
@Juan
Thanks :) I think you may have just given me a solid lead.

@Everyone else
I'm unable to flash the BIOS (as an anti-theft measure, the BIOS has been 
locked by the vendor on the machine I have so that if it is stolen, the image 
asking people to call the support line if they have received the laptop isn't 
removable). So can someone have a go at flashing their BIOS with the latest 
version (I've currently got 0904 on this laptop but it should be 1104) and 
confirm whether this exhibits the behaviour Juan has described:
Running linux-image-2.6.35-23, with alsa-base 1.0.23. Putting the computer to 
sleep and waking it up seems to make the internal microphone work. The external 
microphone still isn't working but this shouldn't be too hard to figure out 
once we've got the internal mic working (hopefully).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580183

Title:
  asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 580183] Re: asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

2011-01-14 Thread Nevyn
Paul Abrahams - can you file a separate bug report for your problems
please? The solution that we come up with here might help you (though it
seems kind of unlikely to me), but you're mostly just hijacking this bug
report.

Read this page:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs

It's a whole other piece of hardware.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580183

Title:
  asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 580183] Re: asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

2011-01-14 Thread Nevyn
@Milos

Can you also provide the full model number? Have you tried the various
solutions? i.e. putting to sleep and waking up and testing microphone
then. Check with altered balance levels etc.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580183

Title:
  asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 580183] Re: asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

2011-01-14 Thread Nevyn
@Milos

On the bottom of your computer, where you'd find your serial number,
it'll say something along the lines of:

ASUS 1001PX-BLK042W

The 042W seems to be kind of an indication of sub-versions or revisions.
I'm looking to be able to map the different models to the type of sound
card they have (i.e. the different models appear to have a slightly
different implementation of the sound card).

So there are all sorts of solutions or work arounds for the 1001px
but it's not clear what version of the sound card these work on. So if
we can get an idea of what does and doesn't work, on various revisions
of the sound card, we should be able to come up with solutions.

So those people who can load up snd-hda-intel with model=fujitsu and use
model=lifebook to get the microphone and headphones working respectively
is probably just a matter of looking at the verbs.

Those where sleep works, is probably a case of looking at the source
code to see what happens when they wake up.

And those like me, where I'm unable to confirm whether the microphone
works at all (i.e. there has never been a scenario where I've had the
microphone working at all). This is probably going to require figuring
out if any of the vendor pins need to be used and trying to reverse
engineer them or getting information out of Asus about their
implementation.

So it's kind of important to figure out what models there are, which
laptops they affect, and what solutions work for which models.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580183

Title:
  asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 580183] Re: asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

2011-01-14 Thread Nevyn
Juan: Given that #61 has two pci id's and yours seems to be the odd one
out - can you please confirm that your pci-id (under subsystem) is a
8437?

I've started charting the issues we're seeing.

If anyone has a 1001px WHI050S - given that an earlier report shows it
to work out the the box bar the balance issue - I'd really like to know
if I'm on the right track in terms of the sub system pci id's.

And if anyone else can help me complete this picture:
I need:

Full model number of laptop (at the bottom of the laptop on the same sticker as 
the serial number)
The full output of the subsystem line from running lspci -vv which pertains 
to the Audio device.
If any prior workarounds have worked for you.
If you have tried all of the suggestions on this bug report.

And please don't reference other messages while doing this as it makes
it a little awkward. IRQ's shouldn't be important here so feel free to
omit that detail.

Thanks,
Nevyn.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580183

Title:
  asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 580183] Re: asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

2011-01-12 Thread Nevyn
I have been having a look at the output of lspci. It turns out the different 
cards can be differentiated. These are my results:
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family High Definition Audio 
Controller (rev 02)
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device 8437
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- 
MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 32 bytes
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 46
Region 0: Memory at f7cf8000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
Capabilities: access denied
Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel
Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel

The lspci attached to this bug report is thusly:
00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family High Definition 
Audio Controller [8086:27d8] (rev 02)
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:8442]
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- 
MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 32 bytes
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 22
Region 0: Memory at f7cf8000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
Capabilities: access denied
Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel
Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel

The important line seems to be the subsystem. I've asked our vendor to
contact Asus about possibly getting some information on the model I've
got. Can I get some more results from lspci -v pertaining to the audio
device from those having issues?

This should enable us to get an idea of how many different revisions
there appear to be for this sound card and hopefully means we'll be able
to fix a range of them.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580183

Title:
  asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 580183] Re: asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

2011-01-11 Thread Nevyn
*grumble* Unable to replicate. I have a:
ASUS 1001PX-BLK042W

I'm guessing at the very least our first 100 are 042W's (I haven't seen
the new laptops yet so they could very well be a slightly different
model number).

So this could very well be multiple bugs - what works on the 033S
doesn't look like it's going to work on the 044S and 042W.

I'll see if I can come up with a likely patch for the 033S - though I
won't be able to test so it may or may not work.

As for the other two models - I'm at a complete loss. I'm guessing
someone would have already done this, but I'm going to have a go loading
up the drivers with the various models and see if any of them work with
a microphone. That'll at least give me somewhere to start from.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580183

Title:
  asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 580183] Re: asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

2011-01-08 Thread Nevyn
The internal speaker switching thing shouldn't be too much of a hassle
to figure out. It's just a verb thing I think. At this stage, it's
really important to try and get a microphone working (for my scenario) -
I can play around with the rest once I've gotten that bit of
functionality going. I'm going to play with 10.10 and see if I can
replicate #57.

#58 - That's a bit more interesting. A slightly different version of
Alsa which I wouldn't have thought would have made too much of a
difference. It might be interesting to do a diff on the source code for
that module.

I'm hoping that if I am able to replicate #57, then it might be
interesting to see what the module does on wake up. Of course, that adds
the complication in providing a patch and people having to compile it
themselves (unless someone wants to make up a ppa for it).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580183

Title:
  asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 580183] Re: asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

2011-01-07 Thread Nevyn
Is anything happening with this at all?

There appears to be two problems here:
1. I've not been able to get the microphone to work once - neither via external 
microphone or internal microphone.
2. Noise cancellation or something means that you have to shift the balance of 
the microphone essentially making it mono.

Now the question is, is anyone, anyone at all, actually working on this
problem? Or are we sitting around hoping that something will change in
alsa or the kernels?

So I'm at the same stage as Juan Gonzalez only I need this for 2,000
netbooks this year. If you're going to report something working, can you
please provide full details? i.e. versions of applications (the kernel
and alsa), what version of Ubuntu you're using etc.

I need this to be working in Lucid.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580183

Title:
  asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 580183] Re: asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

2011-01-07 Thread Nevyn
Okay - I've had a bit more of a thorough look.

If I shift the balance all the way to the left, the noise stops. All the
way to right and center, noise.

Looking at the source code there was something about nomicbias which I'm
hoping addresses the balance stuff though I'd have to get something from
the microphone to get an idea of the balance issue.

So how do I go about getting the sound card working? By the looks of the
source code, the only thing that differentiates the different models are
verbs and more specifically, the vendor specific pins. HDA-Analyser is
next to useless in this regard as it doesn't describe anything about
what can and can't be set with with those pins.

Does anyone know how hard it would get to get that information?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580183

Title:
  asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 580183] Re: asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

2011-01-07 Thread Nevyn
The other thing to note: The inputs show up in sound preferences as
Microphone 1, Microphone 2 and Line-In. I checked the balancing trick on
each Microphone and it appears they are treated exactly the same. I'm
guessing that the two microphones are actually the one stereo
microphone?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580183

Title:
  asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 580183] Re: asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone

2010-11-17 Thread Nevyn
Back to the subject on hand (Don't really care about skype - it's the
sound card that I need working)

I have 100 of the Asus eee 1001px machines out on a pilot program at the
moment with 2000 of these machines being deployed next year. I REALLY
need a fix for this - the pressure is really on now as this is
essentially a trial of what will become a nationwide programme.

I did try the 2.6.35-RC1 kernel have had no joy as well as updated alsa
drivers.

Let me know what you need from me to get this sorted.

-- 
asus eeepc 1001px in/out jack not functionnal and screen microphone
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 465318] Re: intel graphics laptop crashes with external monitor

2010-04-14 Thread Nevyn
Is anyone actually working on this?

The work-arounds that people are suggesting aren't a solution.

Is this a problem with the driver? e.g. report the correct maximum
resolution to xrandr based on the type of video card rather than JUST
the driver used.

Is the problem with xrandr?

Is the problem with the way that the gnome screen settings application
work?

Seriously - there's a problem here. People are finding ways to not work
with the full capabilities of their hardware. This error report seems to
be being ignored. Can we please have something happening

-- 
intel graphics laptop crashes with external monitor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465318
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 465318] Re: intel graphics laptop crashes with external monitor

2010-02-23 Thread Nevyn
The problem is with the Intel driver. This is a known limitation:

No support for X Screens larger than 2048 pixels in either direction
before the 965.

xrandr seems to report the wrong maximum screen size (as 4096 in either
direction).

Turning off compiz is not an option for me as it's used for productivity
purposes. Spent all of last night writing a script with the limitation
in mind but am now unable to figure out how to replace Ubuntu's action
for the video out key.

Is there any documentation for doing this??

-- 
intel graphics laptop crashes with external monitor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465318
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 162680] Re: Downloading all files fails if some files have already been downloaded

2009-11-09 Thread Nevyn
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Philip Muskovac yo...@gmx.net wrote:
 Hi, you reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity
 in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue for you. Can
 you still reproduce this issue in a newer release? Gutsy has reached EOL
 in April 2009 and isn't supported anymore. Thanks in advance.

 --
 Downloading all files fails if some files have already been downloaded
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162680
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

Hi,

Stopped using TorrentFlux a long time ago.

-- 
Downloading all files fails if some files have already been downloaded
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162680
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 459198] Re: Can't install Ubuntu 9.10, hangs before installing

2009-10-24 Thread Nevyn
I have just tried to do a fresh install with the 9.10-rc 32 bit version.
I can choose the language and if I choose run from disk or install It
freezes.

this is new on the RC disk the previous beta I had installed although
there were some missing files.

-- 
Can't install Ubuntu 9.10, hangs before installing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459198
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 454268] Re: 9.10 live CD not booting on HP Compaq 615

2009-10-24 Thread Nevyn
Tried this on a Dell Optiplex 745 and even with the nolapic option
selected under F6  the install and / or live CD option did not work with
the 32 bit RC 9.10 image

-- 
9.10 live CD not booting on HP Compaq 615
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454268
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 162680] Re: Downloading all files fails if some files have already been downloaded

2008-12-04 Thread Nevyn
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:32 PM, wolfger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Muhammad, please read the bug reports more carefully. The version used
 was part of the original report. The bug reporter has already expressed
 frustration that the information he provided was disregarded, and then
 you ask him for information that is already in the report.

 Nevyn: Please provide the requested screenshot. Also, are you still
 using Gutsy? Can you try the latest version (Intrepid) and see if the
 problem still exists?

There really isn't anything to see. The behavior is just as described.

If you select a torrent with multiple files and select to only
download a sub set of those files, then when you come back and decide
to download the rest, torrentflux reports the download as complete
without even attempting to download those files.

And not a chance - from what I hear Intrepid is more trouble than it's
worth - I'm probably sticking to Gutsy or moving to Debian Lenny.

-- 
Downloading all files fails if some files have already been downloaded
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162680
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 102978] Re: Bittornado doesn't download all of files

2008-10-04 Thread Nevyn
I think this problem was fixed a while back with no update to the bug
report.

On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Daniel T Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Is this symptom still reproducible in 8.10 beta?

 ** Changed in: bittornado (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

 --
 Bittornado doesn't download all of files
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102978
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.


-- 
Bittornado doesn't download all of files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102978
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 162680] Re: Downloading all files fails if some files have already been downloaded

2008-07-18 Thread Nevyn
The bug was never really fully investigated. I did provide the
information asked for and it was disregarded. The problem does still
exist.

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Muhammad Takdir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 We are closing this bug report because it lacks the information we need
 to investigate the problem, as described in the previous comments.
 Please reopen it if you can give us the missing information, and don't
 hesitate to submit bug reports in the future. To reopen the bug report
 you can click on the current status, under the Status column, and change
 the Status back to New. Thanks again!

 ** Changed in: torrentflux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Invalid

 --
 Downloading all files fails if some files have already been downloaded
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162680
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.


-- 
Downloading all files fails if some files have already been downloaded
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162680
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 111618] Re: torrent flux database config crashed when upgrading to 7.04 ubuntu

2007-11-14 Thread Nevyn
The issue's been around for awhile. I'm not sure why it hasn't been
addressed though once you've installed it I suppose it's no longer a
problem.

Torrentflux expects a database called torrentflux to already be there.
Which of course, when you initially install it's not. To fix it, you can
log into mysql and create a table called torrentflux. I can't remember
the exact steps.

-- 
torrent flux database config crashed when upgrading to 7.04 ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 162680] Downloading all files fails if some files have already been downloaded

2007-11-14 Thread Nevyn
Public bug reported:

When downloading a torrent with multiple files I often download 1 file
at a time. However, when I get near the end of downloading all the
files, I can't download the last file.

I.e. Click on the green arrow beside the torrent name, select files to
download. Finishing downloading those files. Attempt to do the same this
time selecting all of the files. Download files - normally comes up with
Download Successful or seeding depending on settings.

Only work around I've found is to move all the files from the directory,
and download the last file separately. Failure to move the files results
in them being deleted.

Torrentflux 2.3 on Gutsy Gibbon.

** Affects: torrentflux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Downloading all files fails if some files have already been downloaded
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162680
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 102978] Re: Bittornado doesn't download all of files

2007-11-14 Thread Nevyn
I had noticed this although found that it only does it to the last file.
So if you download the next file, you normally get the block your
missing and it fixes itself by the time you get you've downloaded all
the files. Not ideal but probably not too much of an issue.

-- 
Bittornado doesn't download all of files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102978
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 162680] Re: Downloading all files fails if some files have already been downloaded

2007-11-14 Thread Nevyn
Definitely not bug #102978.

The issue here effects whole files, not just a couple of blocks. For
example, if a torrent contains files a, b, c and d, and I download a, b,
c. I'm then unable to download d because as soon as I select it and tell
it to start downloading, it acts as though the file has been already
been downloaded.

-- 
Downloading all files fails if some files have already been downloaded
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162680
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 102970] Re: dependancy php4-mysql should be replaced by php5-mysql

2007-05-15 Thread Nevyn
Apache was restarted during installation. The issue was that by
default php4 was being used which appeared not to work. The issue is a
simple dependancy error or an error in php4.

On 5/16/07, Luca Falavigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thank you for your bug report.
 It should be sufficient to simply restart apache2 by invoking 
 /etc/init.d/apache2 restart in order to reload PHP configuration. Newer 
 versions should to this by default.
 Could you please check?

 ** Changed in: torrentflux (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Luca Falavigna
   Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info

 --
 dependancy php4-mysql should be replaced by php5-mysql
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102970
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.


-- 
dependancy php4-mysql should be replaced by php5-mysql
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102970
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 102970] dependancy php4-mysql should be replaced by php5-mysql

2007-04-04 Thread Nevyn
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: torrentflux

Upon first installing this application (after manually having to create
torrentflux database) browsing to torrentfluxserver/torrentflux you
are presented with this error:

Fatal error: Call to undefined function mysql_connect() in
/var/www/html/adodb/drivers/adodb-mysql.inc.php on line 354

Suggestions around the internet seem to be to edit
/etc/php4/apache/php.ini and enable the mysql.so module.

This however didn't appear to work but running aptitude purge php4-mysql
had aptitude replacing it with php5-mysql and this worked.

** Affects: torrentflux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
dependancy php4-mysql should be replaced by php5-mysql
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102970
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 102978] Bittornado doesn't download all of files

2007-04-04 Thread Nevyn
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: bittornado

I was running bittorrent and in turn bittornado.

I've noticed that it's been doing some strange things to some files that
I've downloaded making most of them unreadable. I then decided to try
running Azureus and seeing what's going on (it has some really quite
cool visualization). Anyway, I loaded up one of the files that didn't
seem to be working, it downloaded for all of 2 seconds and then reported
that 100% of the file had been downloaded. What's more, the file
suddenly worked.

So I added a few more files to see what's happening here. It seems that
torrentflux (and in turn bittornado) has been leaving off two blocks off
every file. The first and last block.

Although it's been doing this to ALL the files, it's only noticeable on
most of them because some files don't need ALL the information.

** Affects: bittornado (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
Bittornado doesn't download all of files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102978
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs