[Bug 1543704] Re: Gparted crashed on loading
I had similar, before 4Weeks, in ubuntu 16.04 beta. Assertion (metadata_length > 0) at ../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:2313 in function add_logical_part_metadata() failed. libparted : 3.2 == Backtrace has 15 calls on stack: 15: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_assert+0x44) [0x7f23bb7fdea4] 14: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x1e45f) [0x7f23bb81145f] 13: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0xf8ba) [0x7f23bb8028ba] 12: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_disk_add_partition+0x25f) [0x7f23bb8031af] 11: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x1dd4f) [0x7f23bb810d4f] 10: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x1dde0) [0x7f23bb810de0] 9: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x1dd89) [0x7f23bb810d89] 8: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x1ed75) [0x7f23bb811d75] 7: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_disk_new+0x48) [0x7f23bb802dd8] 6: /usr/sbin/gpartedbin() [0x466c0e] 5: /usr/sbin/gpartedbin() [0x47555e] 4: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglibmm-2.4.so.1(+0x4e67d) [0x7f23bcd0e67d] 3: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0(+0x70b45) [0x7f23bbcc6b45] 2: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x76fa) [0x7f23bab376fa] 1: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d) [0x7f23ba86d2dd] Assertion (metadata_length > 0) at ../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:2313 in function add_logical_part_metadata() failed. Aborted (core dumped) $ sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda Disk /dev/sda: 238.5 GiB, 256060514304 bytes, 500118192 sectors Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disklabel type: dos Disk identifier: 0x50632122 Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type /dev/sda1 *14336 209728574 209714239 100G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT /dev/sda2 209729536 250689535 4096 19.5G 3 XENIX usr /dev/sda3 250689536 291650473 40960938 19.5G 3 XENIX usr /dev/sda4 291651583 500100343 208448761 99.4G f W95 Ext'd (LBA) /dev/sda5 291651646 332625887 40974242 19.6G 83 Linux /dev/sda6 332625888 353108699 20482812 9.8G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT /dev/sda7 353112064 500100343 146988280 70.1G 83 Linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1543704 Title: Gparted crashed on loading To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/1543704/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1558621] [NEW] package fglrx 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: none ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: fglrx 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-32.37~14.04.1-generic 3.19.8-ckt7 Uname: Linux 3.19.0-32-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.19 AptOrdering: fglrx: Purge Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Mar 16 17:47:39 2016 DpkgTerminalLog: Removing fglrx (2:15.302-0ubuntu1) ... Purging configuration files for fglrx (2:15.302-0ubuntu1) ... update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/atieventsd exists during rc.d purge (use -f to force) DuplicateSignature: package:fglrx:2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1:subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-11-28 (474 days ago) InstallationMedia: Linux Mint 17 "Qiana" - Release amd64 20140624 RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.17.5ubuntu5.5 apt 1.0.1ubuntu2.11 SourcePackage: fglrx-installer Title: package fglrx 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: fglrx-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package rosa third-party-packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558621 Title: package fglrx 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/1558621/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1553803] [NEW] fglrx-updates-core 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1: fglrx-updates-core kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: no decoration windows. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: fglrx-updates-core 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-32.37~14.04.1-generic 3.19.8-ckt7 Uname: Linux 3.19.0-32-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.19 Architecture: amd64 DKMSKernelVersion: 4.4.2-040402-generic Date: Mon Mar 7 00:17:10 2016 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-11-28 (464 days ago) InstallationMedia: Linux Mint 17 "Qiana" - Release amd64 20140624 PackageVersion: 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.17.5ubuntu5.5 apt 1.0.1ubuntu2.11 SourcePackage: fglrx-installer-updates Title: fglrx-updates-core 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1: fglrx-updates-core kernel module failed to build UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) modified.conffile..etc.ati.atiapfxx: [deleted] modified.conffile..etc.ati.authatieventsd.sh: [deleted] modified.conffile..etc.ati.logo.mask.xbm.example: [deleted] modified.conffile..etc.ati.logo.xbm.example: [deleted] modified.conffile..etc.ati.signature: [deleted] ** Affects: fglrx-installer-updates (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package rosa third-party-packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553803 Title: fglrx-updates-core 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1: fglrx-updates-core kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer-updates/+bug/1553803/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1080711] [NEW] package bluez 4.101-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: サブプロセス インストール済みの post-installation スクリプト はエラー終了ステータス 1 を返しました
Public bug reported: i dont know. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: bluez 4.101-0ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-19.30-generic 3.5.7 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-19-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu6 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Nov 19 21:51:15 2012 ErrorMessage: サブプロセス インストール済みの post-installation スクリプト はエラー終了ステータス 1 を返しました InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-10-30 (20 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 (20120817.1) InterestingModules: bnep rfcomm bluetooth MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name MarkForUpload: True ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-19-generic root=UUID=e5edcb28-5760-4d71-bffb-58ba4a2ddd68 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: bluez Title: package bluez 4.101-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: サブプロセス インストール済みの post-installation スクリプト はエラー終了ステータス 1 を返しました UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-11-19 (0 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 08/13/2012 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 2206 dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M. dmi.board.name: F1A75-V PRO dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. dmi.board.version: Rev X.0x dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr2206:bd08/13/2012:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnF1A75-VPRO:rvrRevX.0x:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: System Product Name dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer hciconfig: rfkill: ** Affects: bluez (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package quantal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080711 Title: package bluez 4.101-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: サブプロセス インストール済みの post-installation スクリプト はエラー終了ステータス 1 を返しました To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/1080711/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1041966] Re: package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same package
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041966 Title: package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lm-sensors/+bug/1041966/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1041966] [NEW] package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same package
Public bug reported: dpkgselect ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic 3.2.24 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-29-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu12 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Aug 27 07:07:28 2012 ErrorMessage: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same package InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 (20120823.1) SourcePackage: lm-sensors Title: package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same package UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041966 Title: package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lm-sensors/+bug/1041966/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 993258] [NEW] package clamav-daemon (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: I don't know ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: clamav-daemon (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed May 2 19:42:02 2012 DpkgHistoryLog: Start-Date: 2012-05-02 19:41:52 Commandline: aptdaemon role='role-commit-packages' sender=':1.97' Upgrade: update-manager:amd64 (0.156.14, 0.156.14.1), update-manager-core:amd64 (0.156.14, 0.156.14.1), remmina-common:amd64 (1.0.0-1ubuntu5, 1.0.0-1ubuntu6), remmina-plugin-rdp:amd64 (1.0.0-1ubuntu5, 1.0.0-1ubuntu6), remmina-plugin-vnc:amd64 (1.0.0-1ubuntu5, 1.0.0-1ubuntu6), remmina:amd64 (1.0.0-1ubuntu5, 1.0.0-1ubuntu6) DuplicateSignature: Setting up clamav-daemon (0.97.3+dfsg-2.1ubuntu1) ... touch: `/var/log/clamav/clamav.log' に touch できません: そのようなファイルやディレクトリはありません dpkg: error processing clamav-daemon (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 SourcePackage: clamav Title: package clamav-daemon (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: clamav (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993258 Title: package clamav-daemon (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/993258/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 993258] Re: package clamav-daemon (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993258 Title: package clamav-daemon (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/993258/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 973088] Re: tracker-miner-fs crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message()
when atached iPhone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973088 Title: tracker-miner-fs crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tracker/+bug/973088/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 971839] Re: aptd crashed with UnboundLocalError in _emit_acquire_item(): local variable 'lang' referenced before assignment
i dont know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971839 Title: aptd crashed with UnboundLocalError in _emit_acquire_item(): local variable 'lang' referenced before assignment To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptdaemon/+bug/971839/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 971839] Re: aptd crashed with UnboundLocalError in _emit_acquire_item(): local variable 'lang' referenced before assignment
i dont know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971839 Title: aptd crashed with UnboundLocalError in _emit_acquire_item(): local variable 'lang' referenced before assignment To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptdaemon/+bug/971839/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 927043] Re: when installling
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927043 Title: when installling To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/927043/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 927043] [NEW] when installling
Public bug reported: btrfs ? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: ubiquity 2.8.7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.287 Date: Sun Feb 5 16:48:20 2012 LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111012) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=ja_JP.UTF-8 PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ubiquity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oneiric ubiquity-2.8.7 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927043 Title: when installling To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/927043/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 921523] Re: package libomxil-bellagio0 0.9.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921523 Title: package libomxil-bellagio0 0.9.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libomxil-bellagio/+bug/921523/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 921523] [NEW] package libomxil-bellagio0 0.9.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127
Public bug reported: when sudo apt-get upgrade ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libomxil-bellagio0 0.9.3-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-10.18-generic 3.2.1 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-10-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Jan 25 15:27:00 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Alpha amd64 (20120116) SourcePackage: libomxil-bellagio Title: package libomxil-bellagio0 0.9.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-25 (0 days ago) ** Affects: libomxil-bellagio (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921523 Title: package libomxil-bellagio0 0.9.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libomxil-bellagio/+bug/921523/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642799] Re: fglrx kernel module failed to build
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608367/+files/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608368/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "DKMSBuildLog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608369/+files/DKMSBuildLog.txt ** Attachment added: "GdmLog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608370/+files/GdmLog.txt ** Attachment added: "GdmLog1.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608371/+files/GdmLog1.txt ** Attachment added: "GdmLog2.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608372/+files/GdmLog2.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608373/+files/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608374/+files/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: "PciDisplay.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608375/+files/PciDisplay.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608376/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608377/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608378/+files/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: "RelatedPackageVersions.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608379/+files/RelatedPackageVersions.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608380/+files/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608381/+files/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: "XorgLog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608382/+files/XorgLog.txt ** Attachment added: "XorgLogOld.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608383/+files/XorgLogOld.txt ** Attachment added: "Xrandr.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608384/+files/Xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: "glxinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608385/+files/glxinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "setxkbmap.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608386/+files/setxkbmap.txt ** Attachment added: "xdpyinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608388/+files/xdpyinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "xkbcomp.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608389/+files/xkbcomp.txt -- fglrx kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642799] [NEW] fglrx kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: what shall i do. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: fglrx (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.43-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Sep 19 22:28:47 2010 DkmsStatus: vboxdrv, 3.2.8, 2.6.32-24-generic, x86_64: installed vboxnetflt, 3.2.8, 2.6.32-24-generic, x86_64: installed vboxnetadp, 3.2.8, 2.6.32-24-generic, x86_64: installed ErrorMessage: fglrx kernel module failed to build InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100429) MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name PackageVersion: 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu4 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-24-generic root=UUID=e4b8b55c-4642-46d7-bb6b-7a3b6d09f88d ro quiet splash SourcePackage: fglrx-installer Title: package fglrx (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build dmi.bios.date: 04/26/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 2002 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: M4A78-EM-1394 dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.board.version: Rev X.0x dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr2002:bd04/26/2010:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnM4A78-EM-1394:rvrRevX.0x:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: System Product Name dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer system: distro: Ubuntu codename: lucid architecture: x86_64 kernel: 2.6.32-24-generic ** Affects: fglrx-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package lucid -- fglrx kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
I had seen SB7*0 debelopment guide. it was difficult for me to undaerstand. http://support.amd.com/us/Embedded_TechDocs/43366_sb7xx_bdg_pub_1.00.pdf By the way. These bugs are in All Linux distro(CentOS,Redhat6.0 beta&Current,Fedora). And like Acronis products. if No one would do the bug fix. Cannot our normally use it through all eternity? Is mentainaner of dmraid on the register in Redhat? Thinking the blessing to the weather if the level is waited during half a year(or 2 years) is one judgment. However, is there a possibility to be left, too?There is a possibility that time solves in terms of the viewpoint of marketing because making HD a large capacity is becoming common sense. I do not understand though there are feelings that understand. When I do very, am I good?Unfortunately, I have two SB7** motherboards, and it doesn't have the funding ability that can be bought additionally now. Or, will it be the same also in other mother boards like intel-chip as long as DMRAID is used? Only even distinguishing from the bug for me is happy. thanks,All. -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
I swaped motherboard, again.restored to and Correction RAIDBIOS VERSION M4A78-EM/1394 AMD790GX +SB750 raidbios 3.0.1540.39 M3A78-TAMD780G +SB710 raidbios 3.0.1540.39 3.0.1540.59 -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
add information: I swaped motherboard from asus M4A78-EM/1394 to asus M3A78-T. There have almost compatible raid chip SB7xx. asus M4A78-EM/1394 AMD790GX +SB750 raidbios 3.0.1540.59 and 3.0.1540.39(both I tested). asus M3A78-T AMD780G+SB710 raidbios now,I can not see. I get same Gpated's snapshot on 2nd array ,M3A78-T. JUST HALF SIZE. (both motherboard had updated latest bios.) -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
I wonder that "MBR is correct." is my opnion. sudo dd if=/dev/mapper/pdc_befgjjibfc of=linmbr2.img bs=512 count=1 In this my environment , Sometimes strange phenomenon occurs nearly 1st july . The command(sudo grub-install /dev/mappaer/myraid1 ) may be viable, sometimes not. The operation is not constant. Now, it is execute. eg. sudo grub-install /dev/mapper/pdc_bedhddhdfc sudo grub-install /dev/mapper/pdc_befgjjibfc same output. You have a memory leak (not released memory pool): [0x259c8f0] You have a memory leak (not released memory pool): [0x23848f0] You have a memory leak (not released memory pool): [0x21e2150] You have a memory leak (not released memory pool): [0x235b150] You have a memory leak (not released memory pool): [0x1f228f0] You have a memory leak (not released memory pool): [0x1141170] Installation finished. No error reported. ** Attachment added: "linmbr2.img.tar.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51619603/linmbr2.img.tar.gz -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
On ubuntu.gparted . http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6626165/Screenshot--dev-mapper-pdc_befgjjibfc%20-%20GParted.png Numbers are just half the number originally to be presented. This is simply a miscalculation. MBR is correct. -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
thanks. >So you have 2 x 2TB and 1 x 500GB drives. Yes, that is good your idea. However,I tryed last week. I Can create two array, can not create three array. It is limitatations of this raid-bios. only two array. (this asus motherboard) Maybe I saw hope. I initialized 2.09TiB as mbr. and create 2048GB/NTFS and the extra 94.96GB/NTFS. these two partation can read/write/use wintx64 and xp32. no problem. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7882415/2nd-win.PNG I reboot ,now. to switch ubuntu. -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
Next ,I boot Win7x64. on management of computer. there anre 2nd raid array. basic.normal 2142.97GB RAW DISK. not ntfs. so I can not see my pictures which put on ubuntu. -- World Cup TV but also watch because, abacus it, I should go back to its core business, next monday. Very grateful to Danny. Really sorry, I want some time for biz. and go back. My 90% job is handled by Ubuntu. -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
I boot WinXP32. on management of computer. there are 2nd raid array. basic, norml.4095.99GB. <---Abnormal value. -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
And, I initilized as windows told me. MBR. I created A 2TiB partiation. I decided to throw away the fraction. 0.09TiB. and reboot, swich to ubuntu. #gpated Strange phenomenon occurs. There are GPT partiton. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6626165/Screenshot--dev-mapper-pdc_befgjjibfc%20-%20GParted.png Even though the initialization information is not lost Partitions. ## fdisk /dev/mapper/pdc_befgjjibfc GNU Fdisk 1.2.4 Warning: /dev/mapper/pdc_befgjjibfc contains GPT signatures, indicating that it has a GPT table. However, it does not have a valid fake msdos partition table, as it should. Perhaps it was corrupted -- possibly by a program that doesn't understand GPT partition tables. Or perhaps you deleted the GPT table, and are now using an msdos partition table. Is this a GPT partition table? y Yes n No I choice N. then, fdisk done. Going around in circles. so, I choice Y. I done. next initialized mbr by gparted. I create A ntfs 2TiB . labeled R2D1. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6626165/gp001.png http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6626165/gp002.png I mounted R2D1. I put 16 pictures. Continue... --- Currently, MBR and GPT For both cases. Have a problem either. Obvious？ -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
And reboot, swicth to win7x64. Diskmanager told me. Which type initialize GPT or MBR. there are no partition table. #46 same situation.I try again and again. And Going around in circles. -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
(using kpartx which your procedure) ubutu can create partition on GPT disk(2nd) by gparted. Disk /dev/mapper/pdc_befgjjibfc: 2300 GB, 2300997404160 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 279747 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/mapper/pdc_befgjjibfc1 1 1239899586903 83 Linux *1 Warning: Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/mapper/pdc_befgjjibfc2 12398 279748 2147488875 83 Linux Warning: Partition 2 does not end on cylinder boundary. *1 this partition is ntfs. pdc_bedhddhdfc1st aray 2.0TiB pdc_befgjjibfc 2nd array 2.09TiB -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
>Anyway you do need to use gpt partitioning to use large volumes like this. Previously, as written. ubuntu can not create GUID partition in my 2nd array. gparted . and diskutility too. the other ubuntu can make guid partition table. (parted) p model: Linux device-mapper (striped) (dm) disk /dev/mapper/pdc_befgjjibfc: 2301GB sector size (log/ph): 512B/512B partition table: gpt 番号 開始終了サイズ ファイルシステム 名前 フラグ 117.4kB 2301GB 2301GB Currently. my mappername was change. I made resetting raid size. 1st2.0TiB MBR max. 2nd 2.09TiB -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
>With the NTFS partition you created in Ubuntu is the same partition then >visible in windows? Previously, as written. on Raid array1, Visible,I can use/read/write NTFS which was created by ubuntu in windows. no problem.Interoperability,each other,ubuntu and windows/XP/7. on Raid array2, I can not know partitons. It was one "RAW partition" in Windows. -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
I had Miscalculation. 2097149MiB to 2097152MiB. The latter setting the new. I recreated partition. and recreated mbr. Disk /dev/mapper/pdc_cdgjdcefic: 2498 GB, 2498996344320 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 303819 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/mapper/pdc_cdgjdcefic1 1 267349 21474808117 HPFS/NTFS /dev/mapper/pdc_cdgjdcefic2 267350 303819 292937242 83 Linux ** Attachment added: "linmbr.img" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51550917/linmbr.img -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
Thanks , about my 2nd 2.5TB RAID0. 1st , boot Win7x64, and created NTFS limit(automatic 2048GB). next boot ubuntu, I created manulaly 2TB NTFS(and other blank 239GB(286079MiB)) by Gparted. and next, boot Win7x64 again. In disk management shows me , 1 partition as 2.5TB RAW disk(not formated). By the way, I would have to face what caused the bug? AMD SB700/800(promise)？ DMRAID？ GPARTED？ kernel? ** Attachment added: "partinfo.tar.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51511980/partinfo.tar.gz -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
Seeing in Ubuntu ** Attachment added: "Screenshot--dev-mapper-pdc_cdgjdcefic - GParted-1.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51492571/Screenshot--dev-mapper-pdc_cdgjdcefic%20-%20GParted-1.png -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
this snapshot which createed mbr on win7x64. now, I can see this partation table . but size are misread. I made 2048GB NTFS and other 279.37GB(not partationed). but ubuntu gparted show me that 1024GB and blank 1.27TiB. ** Attachment added: "win7x64.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51492537/win7x64.png -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
>Are you sure the partitions you created in windows did not exist in Ubuntu? >Could you recreate them and then do a print screen of gparted looking at the >drive? Yes, in ubuntu, There are no partition. (Perhaps, I could not see partition table). -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
And, onWin4x64. I initilized GPT, I partitioned 2 NTFS part. But these partitions are not recognize on Ubuntu, too. GPT was not compatible. DiskUtility shows me, not formatted 2.5TB. not GPT, not MBR. add: Disk utility could not format GPT/MBR to 2.5TB. it failed. Gparted could format partation table GPT/MBR. [Diskutility error mes.] Error creating partition table: helper exited with exit code 1: In part_create_partition_table: device_file=/dev/mapper/pdc_cdgjdcefic, scheme=3 got it got disk committed to disk BLKRRPART ioctl failed for /dev/mapper/pdc_cdgjdcefic: Invalid argument -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
So, I initilized GPT, I useed fdisk to partitioning. 3partitons, EXT4,EXT4,swap. But these partitions were not recognize on Windows7x64. not comaptible?! Windows7 Diskmanager tell me . Which type do you initialize GPT. or MBR? -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
On guided partition, ubuntu can not partition. -- a) disk utility Error creating partition: helper exited with exit code 1: In part_add_partition: device_file=/dev/mapper/pdc_cdgjdcefic, start=0, size=1000, type=EBD0A0A2-B9E5-4433-87C0-68B6B72699C7 Entering MS-DOS parser (offset=0, size=249843168) MSDOS_MAGIC found found partition type 0xee => protective MBR for GPT Exiting MS-DOS parser Entering EFI GPT parser GPT magic found partition_entry_lba=2 num_entries=128 size_of_entry=128 Leaving EFI GPT parser EFI GPT partition table detected containing partition table scheme = 3 got it got disk new partition Error: Unable to satisfy all constraints on the partition. ped_disk_add_partition() failed b) GParted 0.5.1 Libparted 2.2 /dev/mapper/pdc_cdgjdcefic1 を ext2 でフォーマット 00:00:01( エラー/error ) /dev/mapper/pdc_cdgjdcefic1 を補正 00:00:00( 成功/suceed ) パス: /dev/mapper/pdc_cdgjdcefic1 開始位置: 34 終了位置: 204989399 容量: 204989366 (97.75 GiB) /dev/mapper/pdc_cdgjdcefic1 のパーティションの種類を設定 00:00:00( 成功/suceed ) 新しいパーティションの種類: ext2 (new partition ) ext2 の新規ファイルシステムを作成する 00:00:01( エラー/error ) (create) mkfs.ext2 -L "" /dev/mapper/pdc_cdgjdcefic1 mke2fs 1.41.11 (14-Mar-2010) Could not stat /dev/mapper/pdc_cdgjdcefic1 --- No such file or directory The device apparently does not exist; did you specify it correctly? -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits
I initialized 2 pattern, guid , mbr on 2.5TB 2nd array. by Gparted. on Gparted. A)Case of GUIDed , ubuntu could not partation. it failed. B)Case of MBR, ubutn could partition. it was success. case a: there are no files pdc_cdgjdcefic1,2. so gparted failed. # dmraid -s *** Active Set name : pdc_cdfjcjhfhe size : 3906249984 stride : 128 type : stripe status : ok subsets: 0 devs : 3 spares : 0 *** Active Set name : pdc_cdgjdcefic size : 4880859264 stride : 128 type : stripe status : ok subsets: 0 devs : 3 spares : 0 ** Attachment added: "dmraid-ay-d.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51448635/dmraid-ay-d.txt -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
Hi Danny, raid0-1st array: Using /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe Disk /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe: 1999 GB, 193282560 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243152 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes →It is the same as former. It is good in this. raid0-2nd array: Using /dev/mapper/pdc_cdgjdcefic Disk /dev/mapper/pdc_cdgjdcefic: 2498 GB, 2498996344320 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 303819 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes →The total content is recognized. It has been improved. It is wonderful. Thank you. Anyway, Please wait a little. It initializes again on ubuntu after it backs up, and ALL ext4 is formatted though it makes to GPT with Win7x64 and tentative is used now. Though time might not be able to be taken until the weekend. The backup is ahead in either case. OR, to use 1Array is betere than 2arrays? My Legasy XP need 100GB of 4.5TB. It is painful. -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
I'm relieved. Slowly, I'll wait. Thank you,all. -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
is this ok? metadata.tar.gz ** Attachment added: "metadata.tar.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51368604/metadata.tar.gz -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
Awareness: Current, Only just type gpated. I can see /dev/mapper/pdc. it's good . Current my partition: 1st array(2TB) /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe1 * 16646533839637 HPFS/NTFS /primary /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe26647 13276532474427 HPFS/NTFS /primary /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe3 13277 217024 163659f Extended LBA /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe5 13277 20251560186557 HPFS/NTFS /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe6 20252 197311 1464177 HPFS/NTFS /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe7 197312 19991520908597 83 Linux(fedora) /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe8 199916 217024 137420010 83 Linux(ubuntu) /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe4 217025 243152 209865127 83 Linux(ubuntu) /primary 2nd-array:pdc_cdgjdcefi(2.5TB) yesterday I partationed 2 part for 2nd array as GPT on Win7x64. I can not see /dev/mapper/pdc_cdgjdcefic by fdsik command. I can see 279.37GiB(blanked space) on gparted. Another Awareness: You may not matter, because some might be useful, to note. sometime,there are strange situation in /dev/mapper/ /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfheX /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhepX Case of adding "p" , ubuntu and kubuntu installer Failure to ensure. So, eg on /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe4 , I copied another ubuntu system parttition , and edited grub.cfg manually. and change uuid and some another check... thus I could boot Primary4 on 1st array. -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
how to treat *.udev files? there(2files) could not install by dependency. another 3 .deb could be install. ** Attachment added: "2nd.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51356328/2nd.txt -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
# dpkg -p dmraid | grep Ver Version: 1.0.0.rc16-3ubuntu2ppa3~lucid1 r...@phantom:/home/ehhen# dmraid -ay -d -vvv >dmraid-ay-d-vvv.txt ** Attachment added: "dmraid-ay-d-vvv.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51327549/dmraid-ay-d-vvv.txt -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
oh, I think that I must wait for building. dmraid -V dmraid version: 1.0.0.rc16 (2009.09.16) shared dmraid library version: 1.0.0.rc16 (2009.09.16) device-mapper version: 4.15.0 -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
maybe, it is ok? I coud upgrade. ls -l dmraid -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 21272 2010-05-30 17:58 dmraid ** Attachment added: "dbg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51314663/dbg.txt -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
r...@phantom:/sbin# ls -l dmraid -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 26891 2010-07-03 03:15 dmraid I do not understand well because I rarely use it(patch). It is difficult for me to patch. Possible deb.form. or (patched)source code..wholly.. get.. I will be glad. The following can be done if it does so. ./configure ,make ,make install. -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
I can not find dmraid_1.0.0.rc16.orig.tar.gz in your ppa page. -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
>patch < dmraid_1.0.0.rc16-3ubuntu2ppa3~lucid1.diff >patching file README.source > >patching file dmraid-activate >patch: File dmraid is not a regular file -- can't patch where I mistaked? dmraid -V dmraid version: 1.0.0.rc16 (2009.09.16) dmraid library version: 1.0.0.rc16 (2009.09.16) device-mapper version: 4.15.0 -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
** Attachment added: "dmraid-ay-d-vvv.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51297982/dmraid-ay-d-vvv.txt -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
I make out. thank you. ** Attachment added: "dmraid-pdc.tar" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51239860/dmraid-pdc.tar ** Also affects: dmraid (Fedora) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
thank you danny r...@phantom:~# sudo dmraid -rD /dev/sdc: pdc, "pdc_cdfjcjhfhe", stripe, ok, 1302083328 sectors, data@ 0 /dev/sdb: pdc, "pdc_cdfjcjhfhe", stripe, ok, 1302083328 sectors, data@ 0 /dev/sda: pdc, "pdc_cdfjcjhfhe", stripe, ok, 1302083328 sectors, data@ 0 r...@phantom:~# cannot dump? -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
I tested acronis disk director 10.0. linuxCDROM boot kernel 2.4.34 DD not support GPT. So, I partitioned as 2TB EXT2 for 2nd array on DD. XP & Win7 can read/write this EXT2 partition. but ,ubuntu can not see. -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
>What software are you trying to partition with? On Linux, fundamentally I use "gparted" or "ubuntu installer" for resize,create,delete. >And how are you working out how much disk they are seeing? how to see my partition. on Fedora, just type. $gparted on Ubuntu $gparted /dev/mapper/pdc_raid on ubuntu ,just type gparted, I see /dev/sda,b,c ,not raid array. -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
it is a snapshot of AMD RAID expert software on XP. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7882415/raid-amd.JPG I'll be very happy if I can serve you -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
I backuped ALL , almost 3TB. I tryed test on CentOS again. Oh, sorry > everyone. on CentOS . I misread message size. CentOS had initialized only 0.3GB (2nd array 2.5TB). CentOS initialized only 286079MB on 2.5TB. every linux have same situations for me. I paste dmraid -ay -vvv -d pdc_cdfjcjhfhe :1st array 2.0TB pdc_cdgjdcefic :2nd array 2.5TB sudo dmraid -ay -vvv -d (ubuntu 10.4 x64) WARN: locking /var/lock/dmraid/.lock NOTICE: /dev/sdc: asr discovering NOTICE: /dev/sdc: ddf1discovering NOTICE: /dev/sdc: hpt37x discovering NOTICE: /dev/sdc: hpt45x discovering NOTICE: /dev/sdc: isw discovering DEBUG: not isw at 1500301908992 DEBUG: isw trying hard coded -2115 offset. DEBUG: not isw at 1500300827136 NOTICE: /dev/sdc: jmicron discovering NOTICE: /dev/sdc: lsi discovering NOTICE: /dev/sdc: nvidia discovering NOTICE: /dev/sdc: pdc discovering NOTICE: /dev/sdc: pdc metadata discovered NOTICE: /dev/sdc: sil discovering NOTICE: /dev/sdc: via discovering NOTICE: /dev/sda: asr discovering NOTICE: /dev/sda: ddf1discovering NOTICE: /dev/sda: hpt37x discovering NOTICE: /dev/sda: hpt45x discovering NOTICE: /dev/sda: isw discovering DEBUG: not isw at 1500301908992 DEBUG: isw trying hard coded -2115 offset. DEBUG: not isw at 1500300827136 NOTICE: /dev/sda: jmicron discovering NOTICE: /dev/sda: lsi discovering NOTICE: /dev/sda: nvidia discovering NOTICE: /dev/sda: pdc discovering NOTICE: /dev/sda: pdc metadata discovered NOTICE: /dev/sda: sil discovering NOTICE: /dev/sda: via discovering NOTICE: /dev/sdb: asr discovering NOTICE: /dev/sdb: ddf1discovering NOTICE: /dev/sdb: hpt37x discovering NOTICE: /dev/sdb: hpt45x discovering NOTICE: /dev/sdb: isw discovering DEBUG: not isw at 1500301908992 DEBUG: isw trying hard coded -2115 offset. DEBUG: not isw at 1500300827136 NOTICE: /dev/sdb: jmicron discovering NOTICE: /dev/sdb: lsi discovering NOTICE: /dev/sdb: nvidia discovering NOTICE: /dev/sdb: pdc discovering NOTICE: /dev/sdb: pdc metadata discovered NOTICE: /dev/sdb: sil discovering NOTICE: /dev/sdb: via discovering DEBUG: _find_set: searching pdc_cdfjcjhfhe DEBUG: _find_set: not found pdc_cdfjcjhfhe DEBUG: _find_set: searching pdc_cdfjcjhfhe DEBUG: _find_set: not found pdc_cdfjcjhfhe DEBUG: _find_set: searching pdc_cdgjdcefic DEBUG: _find_set: searching pdc_cdgjdcefic DEBUG: _find_set: not found pdc_cdgjdcefic DEBUG: _find_set: not found pdc_cdgjdcefic DEBUG: _find_set: searching pdc_cdgjdcefic DEBUG: _find_set: not found pdc_cdgjdcefic NOTICE: added /dev/sdc to RAID set "pdc_cdfjcjhfhe" DEBUG: _find_set: searching pdc_cdfjcjhfhe DEBUG: _find_set: found pdc_cdfjcjhfhe DEBUG: _find_set: searching pdc_cdfjcjhfhe DEBUG: _find_set: found pdc_cdfjcjhfhe DEBUG: _find_set: searching pdc_cdgjdcefic DEBUG: _find_set: found pdc_cdgjdcefic DEBUG: _find_set: searching pdc_cdgjdcefic DEBUG: _find_set: found pdc_cdgjdcefic NOTICE: added /dev/sda to RAID set "pdc_cdfjcjhfhe" DEBUG: _find_set: searching pdc_cdfjcjhfhe DEBUG: _find_set: found pdc_cdfjcjhfhe DEBUG: _find_set: searching pdc_cdfjcjhfhe DEBUG: _find_set: found pdc_cdfjcjhfhe DEBUG: _find_set: searching pdc_cdgjdcefic DEBUG: _find_set: found pdc_cdgjdcefic DEBUG: _find_set: searching pdc_cdgjdcefic DEBUG: _find_set: found pdc_cdgjdcefic NOTICE: added /dev/sdb to RAID set "pdc_cdfjcjhfhe" DEBUG: checking pdc device "/dev/sda" DEBUG: checking pdc device "/dev/sdb" DEBUG: checking pdc device "/dev/sdc" DEBUG: set status of set "pdc_cdfjcjhfhe" to 16 DEBUG: checking pdc device "/dev/sda" DEBUG: checking pdc device "/dev/sdb" DEBUG: checking pdc device "/dev/sdc" DEBUG: set status of set "pdc_cdfjcjhfhe" to 16 DEBUG: checking pdc device "/dev/sda" DEBUG: checking pdc device "/dev/sdb" DEBUG: checking pdc device "/dev/sdc" DEBUG: set status of set "pdc_cdgjdcefic" to 16 DEBUG: checking pdc device "/dev/sda" DEBUG: checking pdc device "/dev/sdb" DEBUG: checking pdc device "/dev/sdc" DEBUG: set status of set "pdc_cdgjdcefic" to 16 RAID set "pdc_cdfjcjhfhe" already active INFO: Activating stripe raid set "pdc_cdfjcjhfhe" RAID set "pdc_cdgjdcefic" already active INFO: Activating stripe raid set "pdc_cdgjdcefic" NOTICE: discovering partitions on "pdc_cdfjcjhfhe" NOTICE: /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe: dos discovering NOTICE: /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe: dos metadata discovered DEBUG: _find_set: searching pdc_cdfjcjhfhe1 DEBUG: _find_set: not found pdc_cdfjcjhfhe1 DEBUG: _find_set: searching pdc_cdfjcjhfhe2 DEBUG: _find_set: not found pdc_cdfjcjhfhe2 DEBUG: _find_set: searching pdc_cdfjcjhfhe5 DEBUG: _find_set: not found pdc_cdfjcjhfhe5 DEBUG: _find_set: searching pdc_cdfjcjhfhe6 DEBUG: _find_set: not found pdc_cdfjcjhfhe6 DEBUG: _find_set: searching pdc_cdfjcjhfhe7 DEBUG: _find_set: not found pdc_cdfjcjhfhe7 DEBUG: _find_set: searching pdc_cdfjcjhfhe8 DEBUG: _find_set: not found pdc_cdfjcjhfhe8 NOTICE: created partitioned RAID set(s) for /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe NOTICE: discovering par
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
Additional test: I tryed another distro,yesterday. In CentOS 5.5 DVD, all capacity was recognized to the second array. 2.5TB . [CentOS inst ]said me "initialize this 2.5TB? so. you will use" but i did not. because. there are 2.5TB NTFS made by windows XP. i need backup before I was glad to listen this message. It doesn't touch PC for about 24 hours because all arrays are backed up now for test. Anything cannot be done now. Please , wait me(backuping my pc). all for test. my fake raid: Asus M4a78-EM1394 onboard. SB7*0.(ATI/Promise) AMD 780G+SB710 1.5TBx3=4.5TB raid0 disto : ubuntu 10.4 , fedora13 , centos5.5 , all x64 edition. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7882415/raid.jpg on win7u others: windowsXP 32bit, Windows7 64bit ultimate (Both OSes can use all capacity 2.0TB & 2.5TB. It is possible to use it without trouble. ) -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
I done . I tryed 1 raid array last week. In this case, Linux(fedora/ubuntu) couod not regognize ALL capacity. so I spilitted 2 arrays. thanks. -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
** Summary changed: - fakeraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 + dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 ** Description changed: - I have two amd sb7*** motherbord. - I use raid0(1.5TB x 3=4.5TB) by bios(SB7*0). + I have two amd sb7*** motherbord. I tryed two case. - I partitioned two array. 2.0TB(A) & 2.5TB(B). + I use raid0(1.5TB x 3=4.5TB) by bios(SB7*0). + + I partitioned two array. 2.0TB(A) and 2.5TB(B). win7-64 -winxp32ubuntu10.4x64/fedora13 x64 +winxp32ubuntu10.4 /fedora13 -- raid-A 2.0TB ok ok all capacity OK - raid-B 2.5TB ok (all) no*1 only 300GB + raid-B 2.5TB ok (all) no*1 only 300GB(NG) -- *1=ubuntu knows only 300gb. fedora too. - ubuntu x64,by DMRAID + ubuntu x64/Fedora13 x64,by DMRAID ** Tags added: 2tb dmraid -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599255] [NEW] fakeraid cannot use over 2TB raid0
Public bug reported: I have two amd sb7*** motherbord. I use raid0(1.5TB x 3=4.5TB) by bios(SB7*0). I partitioned two array. 2.0TB(A) & 2.5TB(B). win7-64 winxp32ubuntu10.4x64/fedora13 x64 -- raid-A 2.0TB ok ok all capacity OK raid-B 2.5TB ok (all) no*1 only 300GB -- *1=ubuntu knows only 300gb. fedora too. ubuntu x64,by DMRAID ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- fakeraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
