[Bug 1958224] Re: brltty claiming cp210x devices on 22.04

2022-06-02 Thread Oliver Grawert
we funnily have removed these udev rules before (but i guess the patch was dropped when syncing a new version) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brltty/+bug/874181 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1968469] Re: ILITEK_ILI9881C panel driver missing

2022-04-11 Thread Oliver Grawert
** Changed in: linux-raspi (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968469 Title: ILITEK_ILI9881C panel driver missing To manage notifications

[Bug 1968469] [NEW] ILITEK_ILI9881C panel driver missing

2022-04-10 Thread Oliver Grawert
Public bug reported: the current 5.15.0-1004-raspi kernel for 22.04 does not enable the CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_ILITEK_ILI9881C=m option, thus such touchscreen panels can not be used the cutiepi (https://cutiepi.io/) project does use this hardware for their pi based tablets. booting ubuntu 22.04 on

[Bug 1963919] [NEW] fbtft overlay is missing

2022-03-07 Thread Oliver Grawert
Public bug reported: To attach TFT touchscreens the pi-foundation kernel ships the fbtft devicetree overlay along with rpi-display. While you can attach a stand-alone TFT display just fine when only using rpi-display to provide the drivers with hardcoded GPIO assignments, it gets extremely

[Bug 1943840] Re: [FFe] Update the ubuntu-desktop-minimal seed to use the firefox snap

2021-09-16 Thread Oliver Grawert
for people not using the official announcement channels, here is a link to the related public announcement (with details on the reasoning and a place for discussion and feedback): https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/feature-freeze-exception-seeding-the- official-firefox-snap-in-ubuntu-desktop/24210

[Bug 1881623] Re: USB support missing in initrd makes booting core with writable on USB impossible

2021-09-14 Thread Oliver Grawert
note that i did never really follow up with that setup in the end but i found out that even modern SSDs (not only rotary HDDs) usually draw more power than the USB3 port can provide, you will need an Y-Cable or external power supply ... while i can not fully confirm (due to lack of time and

[Bug 1926911] Re: hctosys not reading hardware clock on CM4

2021-05-03 Thread Oliver Grawert
https://github.com/snapcore/core-initrd/issues/17 ** Bug watch added: github.com/snapcore/core-initrd/issues #17 https://github.com/snapcore/core-initrd/issues/17 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926911] Re: hctosys not reading hardware clock on CM4

2021-05-03 Thread Oliver Grawert
hirsute does not have Ubuntu Core images ;) It seems to be solvable via a simple defconfig change according to: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/4205 We have at least one UC customer implementing a CM4 baseboard with TPM for Full disk encryption and secureboot in UC20, for this the

[Bug 1926911] Re: hctosys not reading hardware clock on CM4

2021-05-03 Thread Oliver Grawert
ogra@CM4:~$ snap list pi-kernel Name VersionRev Tracking Publisher Notes pi-kernel 5.4.0-1035.38 282 20/edge canonical✓ kernel -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926911] Re: hctosys not reading hardware clock on CM4

2021-05-02 Thread Oliver Grawert
** Description changed: There is a timing issue when using the CM4 with the official CM4 IO baseboard. The CM4 baseboard comes with a built in rtc and a battery holder by default, to enable it a devicetree overlay needs to be enabled and a matching module gets loaded ... $ tail

[Bug 1926911] [NEW] hctosys not reading hardware clock on CM4

2021-05-02 Thread Oliver Grawert
Public bug reported: There is a timing issue when using the CM4 with the official CM4 IO baseboard. The CM4 baseboard comes with a built in rtc and a battery holder by default, to enable it a devicetree overlay needs to be enabled and a matching module gets loaded ... $ tail -2

[Bug 1911943] Re: pi-kernel snap: broadcom bluetooth firmware missing from 5.4.0-1027.30

2021-03-19 Thread Oliver Grawert
well, is there a released snap including this firmware now ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1911943 Title: pi-kernel snap: broadcom bluetooth firmware missing from 5.4.0-1027.30 To

[Bug 1425677] Re: Arduino IDE v. 1.6 released, can we get in repository?

2021-02-21 Thread Oliver Grawert
the 1.8.13 snap runs without issues here https://snapcraft.io/arduino -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1425677 Title: Arduino IDE v. 1.6 released, can we get in repository? To manage

[Bug 1914919] Re: UC20 initrd misses modules to boot from USB disk

2021-02-16 Thread Oliver Grawert
USB3 SATA disk needs: $ diff -ruN mods1.txt mods2.txt --- mods1.txt 2021-02-14 11:46:00.578329987 + +++ mods2.txt 2021-02-14 11:46:23.422140313 + @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ Module Size Used by +uas28672 0 rtl8xxxu 139264 0 rtl8192cu

[Bug 1914919] [NEW] UC20 initrd misses modules to boot from USB disk

2021-02-07 Thread Oliver Grawert
Public bug reported: Trying to use a default USB boot on a Raspberry Pi using either an USB3 UAS SSD enclosure or even a simple USB 2 stick fails (due to the missing console output it simply hangs indefinitely with a black screen

[Bug 1914608] [NEW] no console during boot on UC20

2021-02-04 Thread Oliver Grawert
Public bug reported: when booting UC20 on a Pi4 the screen backlight is completely off and no signal is produced. inspecting the boot a little closer it seems the necessary modules for bringing up the vc4 framebuffer are not included in the initramfs on ubuntu core. once they get loaded (after

[Bug 1900679] Re: [snap] chromium spams dmesg

2021-01-16 Thread Oliver Grawert
snap run --strace chromium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900679 Title: [snap] chromium spams dmesg To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1911943] [NEW] pi-kernel snap: broadcom bluetooth firmware missing from 5.4.0-1027.30

2021-01-15 Thread Oliver Grawert
Public bug reported: supposedly the bluetooth firmware from: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware- raspi2/3-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 should be shipped in the latest pi-kernel snap in the edge/beta channel. the BCM4345C5.hcd (as mentioned in the last changelog entry above) is essential

[Bug 1902915] Re: snapd doesn't ensure portals are available even when they are needed

2021-01-12 Thread Oliver Grawert
the majority of snap packages in the store is *not* desktop focused, snaps are widely commercially used in IoT, embedded, industrial, cloud and server setups ... unlike flatpak which is a delivery mechanism for desktop-only apps, snap is an actual package format, making portals a hard dependency

[Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-12-17 Thread Oliver Grawert
@kosharskiy this is completely unrelated to this installer bug (which is about configuring packages prior to/during install time), you should open a new bug for your issue ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1881623] Re: USB support missing in initrd makes booting core with writable on USB impossible

2020-11-25 Thread Oliver Grawert
so this is indeed not an issue with the modules but with the kernel itself and the support for sas, uas or the enclosure services. i test-built all tags from https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu- kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+git/focal/refs/tags from 1023.26 going backwards and found that it

[Bug 1905272] Re: Can't get h/w video acceleration on rpi4

2020-11-23 Thread Oliver Grawert
this could surely be part of it -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905272 Title: Can't get h/w video acceleration on rpi4 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1905272] Re: Can't get h/w video acceleration on rpi4

2020-11-23 Thread Oliver Grawert
talking to juerg (our kernel maintainer) it seems the codec module should be available in 5.4 in UC20, did you try to manually modprobe it ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905272

[Bug 1905272] Re: Can't get h/w video acceleration on rpi4

2020-11-23 Thread Oliver Grawert
the config option seems to be: CONFIG_VIDEO_CODEC_BCM2835=m ** Also affects: linux-raspi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905272

[Bug 1861558] Re: Snap 'ed applicaitons have garbage on top of the window Close [x] button

2020-11-18 Thread Oliver Grawert
there are various forum and askubuntu threads about this issue already as well: https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/ui-glitch-after-recent-update/15133 https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/some-snaps-app-have-weird-looking-window- control-and-fonts/17859 https://askubuntu.com/q/1206868/66509

[Bug 1898869] Re: System slow on booting

2020-10-29 Thread Oliver Grawert
> a) On theory it compromises the throughput (the whole CPU time that will take > for a > process to finish will be longer) for better responsiveness, even under high > load. So > mouse clicks/UI events should be handled faster and say, when decompressing > large files > or other CPU load by

[Bug 1898869] Re: System slow on booting

2020-10-28 Thread Oliver Grawert
okay, thats quite different ... a) you run the lowlatency kernel for whatever reason ... this is clearly the worst choice you can pick for already slow hardware (low latency -> do one thing as fast as you can ... ignore other things ... i.e. you trade overall system performance for the ability to

[Bug 1898869] Re: System slow on booting

2020-10-28 Thread Oliver Grawert
oh, and i missed, d) there is a mis-configured postfix install running on that device too ... since it is not configured and crashing in a loop during boot anyway, i'd recomend removing postfix ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1898869] Re: System slow on booting

2020-10-28 Thread Oliver Grawert
erm ... this is an atom/celeron laptop with 4GB that starts BOINC as a system service during boot ? there seems to also be a lot of broken gnome-shell extensions installed on this system that error out during startup ... there is ifupdown installed which is probably involved with the network

[Bug 1901669] Re: /etc/sudoers.d/99-snapd.conf is ignored

2020-10-27 Thread Oliver Grawert
/etc/sudoers.d/README pretty clearly states: # This will cause sudo to read and parse any files in the /etc/sudoers.d # directory that do not end in '~' or contain a '.' character. # i wouldn't call that poorly documented (unless someone deletes the README file) ... -- You received this bug

[Bug 1901578] Re: Cannot remove snap package ubuntu 20.10

2020-10-26 Thread Oliver Grawert
** Also affects: snapd Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901578 Title: Cannot remove snap package ubuntu 20.10 To manage notifications

[Bug 1900356] Re: transition from systemd to snapd breaks functionality

2020-10-23 Thread Oliver Grawert
yeah, i agree, the docs could be better here ... the output of "snap stop --help" and "snap disable --help" do show similar text ... to see the (en/disabled) state of any snap based services you can use the "snap services" command ... does using snap stop solve your issue though ? -- You

[Bug 1900356] Re: transition from systemd to snapd breaks functionality

2020-10-23 Thread Oliver Grawert
> # snap enable lxd > lxd enabled could it be that you disabled the whole snap instead of just the daemon in the snap (i think then it is indeed expected that the systemd units go away) ? you need to use "snap stop --disable lxd" to disable the service, not "snap disable lxd" which takes the

[Bug 1900356] Re: transition from systemd to snapd breaks functionality

2020-10-19 Thread Oliver Grawert
note that this is not reproducable on any machine i tried, as described in: https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/have-a-snap-be-run-only-when-started- manually/20493 The mechanism to manually start disabled snap services seems to work just as it should (and given how many snaps in IoT use such a setup

[Bug 1886148] Re: failure to boot groovy daily

2020-09-26 Thread Oliver Grawert
this exists already at http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/%20 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886148 Title: failure to boot groovy daily To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-09-22 Thread Oliver Grawert
please note that the stable UbuntuCore18 images regressed due to this: https://github.com/snapcore/core18/issues/170 ** Bug watch added: github.com/snapcore/core18/issues #170 https://github.com/snapcore/core18/issues/170 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1895382] Re: Ability to install 2 or more versions at once

2020-09-12 Thread Oliver Grawert
for reference: https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/parallel-installs/7679 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895382 Title: Ability to install 2 or more versions at once To manage

[Bug 1890817] Re: Request to include pi-bluetooth in raspi images

2020-08-07 Thread Oliver Grawert
could we first add a small oneshot daemon script in pi-bluetooth that calls: echo -e 'power on\nquit' | bluetoothctl else the BT is not properly powered and thus non-functional when other snaps try to use it ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1881623] Re: USB support missing in initrd makes booting core with writable on USB impossible

2020-08-07 Thread Oliver Grawert
i'll try over the weekend ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881623 Title: USB support missing in initrd makes booting core with writable on USB impossible To manage

[Bug 1662357] Re: Can't use lsb_release on Ubuntu Core 16

2020-07-18 Thread Oliver Grawert
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1619420 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619420 first of all the bug is a duplicate, secondly you can not install deb packages on Ubuntu Core, snap packages (of which Ubuntu Core is built) do use /etc/os-release. Additionally Ubuntu Core only ships the

[Bug 1888055] Re: "error: cannot communicate with server: timeout exceeded while waiting for response" when doing snap refresh

2020-07-18 Thread Oliver Grawert
could be related to https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-outage-on-july-17-2020/ (you can always check the status of the snapcraft.io services at status.snapcraft.io/ ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1887369] Re: Slack (got by snap) crashing on startup

2020-07-13 Thread Oliver Grawert
please see https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/slack-4-7-0-sefgault-ubuntu-18-04/18708/8 (you should report it via /feedback to slack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887369 Title: Slack

[Bug 1881623] Re: USB support missing in initrd makes booting core with writable on USB impossible

2020-07-09 Thread Oliver Grawert
in fact it seems like in 5.3 USB is not working at all !!! i verified that today ... my self-built kernel uses the focal 5.4 branch where USB works fine then: https://github.com/ogra1/linux-raspberrypi- org/blob/master/snap/snapcraft.yaml -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1881623] Re: USB support missing in initrd makes booting core with writable on USB impossible

2020-07-08 Thread Oliver Grawert
also note that the fabrica appliance you linked uses a re-built kernel -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881623 Title: USB support missing in initrd makes booting core with writable on

[Bug 1881623] Re: USB support missing in initrd makes booting core with writable on USB impossible

2020-07-08 Thread Oliver Grawert
hmm, i wonder why they dont load then ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881623 Title: USB support missing in initrd makes booting core with writable on USB impossible To manage

[Bug 1881588] Re: pre-seeding lxd on Core appliances breaks console-conf user creation

2020-07-03 Thread Oliver Grawert
ok, answering myself again: https://github.com/lxc/lxd-pkg-snap/blob/latest- edge/snapcraft/commands/daemon.start#L192 which simply calls: chroot /var/lib/snapd/hostfs/ \ useradd --system -M -N --home /var/snap/lxd/common/lxd \ --shell /bin/false --extrausers lxd || true i dont see how the

[Bug 1881588] Re: pre-seeding lxd on Core appliances breaks console-conf user creation

2020-07-03 Thread Oliver Grawert
while ignoring UID's below 1000 might help in the short term, the "managed" state has a lot more meanings in brand stores and we will likely encounter more breakage introduced by it when customers pre-seed lxd on branded device images so this side of things needs to still be examined. the lxd user

[Bug 1881588] Re: pre-seeding lxd on Core appliances breaks console-conf user creation

2020-07-02 Thread Oliver Grawert
answering my own question: ogra@localhost:~$ grep managed /usr/share/subiquity/console-conf-wrapper if [ "$(snap managed)" = "true" ]; then ogra@localhost:~$ grep PRETTY /etc/os-release PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu Core 18" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1881588] Re: pre-seeding lxd on Core appliances breaks console-conf user creation

2020-07-02 Thread Oliver Grawert
i was thinking the same when i looked at your patch (and noticed the move-around of the "snap managed" code)... are we sure that version of the code is actually in core18 ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 684044] Re: thousands of ica processes on system

2020-07-02 Thread Oliver Grawert
** Changed in: italc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684044 Title: thousands of ica processes on system To manage notifications about this

[Bug 683678] Re: iTalc client does not start on one of 3 "identical" systems

2020-07-02 Thread Oliver Grawert
** Changed in: italc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683678 Title: iTalc client does not start on one of 3 "identical" systems To manage

[Bug 1885901] Re: timedatectl reports wrong status for timesyncd in core18

2020-07-01 Thread Oliver Grawert
theer we go ... thanks a lot dimitri, i opened https://github.com/snapcore/core18/issues/157 ** Bug watch added: github.com/snapcore/core18/issues #157 https://github.com/snapcore/core18/issues/157 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1885901] Re: timedatectl reports wrong status for timesyncd in core18

2020-07-01 Thread Oliver Grawert
i dont know where you guys track core bugs either since foundations took over the responsibility Ubuntu Core with core 18... i can not reproduce it on classic anywhere but on each core18 image i have running at my house ... the customer that initially reported it uses core18, so it is important

[Bug 1885901] [NEW] timedatectl reports wrong status for timesyncd in core18

2020-07-01 Thread Oliver Grawert
Public bug reported: when calling timedatectl in Ubuntu Core 18 the tool reports the status of the systemd-timesyncd.service ... sadly it does report it wrongly (the tool reports it inactive while the service is actually running): ogra@pi4:~$ timedatectl Local time: Wed

[Bug 1885901] Re: timedatectl reports wrong status for timesyncd in core18

2020-07-01 Thread Oliver Grawert
any fix should be SRUed into the respective LTS releases for Ubuntu Core, added tasks for them -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1885901 Title: timedatectl reports wrong status for

[Bug 1881588] Re: pre-seeding lxd on Core appliances breaks console-conf user creation

2020-07-01 Thread Oliver Grawert
sadly this isnt true anymore (not that the slow boards got faster but we rather started to ignore that fact), all images nowadays run cloud-init by default so python is kind of mandatory and gets executed anyway ... with the focus on raspberry pi the actual embedded hardware is rather ignored. --

[Bug 1881588] Re: pre-seeding lxd on Core appliances breaks console-conf user creation

2020-06-13 Thread Oliver Grawert
i dont think there is a snap command to get the managed state (there is "snap known system-user" but that seems to only work if the user was actually created with an assertion) if you actually want shell instead of a simple python http query: root@pi4:~# cat is-managed.sh #! /bin/sh

[Bug 1881588] Re: pre-seeding lxd on Core appliances breaks console-conf user creation

2020-06-12 Thread Oliver Grawert
** Project changed: subiquity => subiquity (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: subiquity (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: subiquity (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1881631] Re: arm64 Ubuntu kernel builds missing CONFIG_NLS_ASCII

2020-06-02 Thread Oliver Grawert
this is definitely a regression, mounting partitions should work ... marking as critical. ** Changed in: linux-raspi2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1881623] Re: USB support missing in initrd makes booting core with writable on USB impossible

2020-06-01 Thread Oliver Grawert
** Also affects: linux-raspi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881623 Title: USB support missing in initrd makes booting core with

[Bug 1881623] Re: USB support missing in initrd makes booting core with writable on USB impossible

2020-06-01 Thread Oliver Grawert
** Description changed: when using a gadget.yaml like: volumes:   pi4-system-boot: schema: mbr bootloader: u-boot structure:   - type: 0C filesystem: vfat filesystem-label: system-boot size: 512M content:   -

[Bug 1881623] Re: USB support missing in initrd makes booting core with writable on USB impossible

2020-06-01 Thread Oliver Grawert
** Description changed: when using a gadget.yaml like: volumes:   pi4-system-boot: schema: mbr bootloader: u-boot structure:   - type: 0C filesystem: vfat filesystem-label: system-boot size: 512M content:   -

[Bug 1881623] [NEW] USB support missing in initrd makes booting core with writable on USB impossible

2020-06-01 Thread Oliver Grawert
Public bug reported: when using a gadget.yaml like: volumes:   pi4-system-boot: schema: mbr bootloader: u-boot structure:   - type: 0C filesystem: vfat filesystem-label: system-boot size: 512M content:   - source: boot-assets/

[Bug 1714244] Re: [snap] apparmor denials on /etc/chromium-browser/policies/

2020-05-26 Thread Oliver Grawert
is there any particular reason to not simply adjust the patch to point to $SNAP_DATA/etc/chromium-browser/policies ? after all this is where system-wide configs should go ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1875493] Re: [core] log rotation doesn't properly restart rsyslogd

2020-05-14 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
it is a hard requirement of the SRU process that fixes land in the devel release and then propagate backwards through all other releases ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875493

[Bug 1878449] Re: 20.04's desktop installer always fsck's when starting

2020-05-13 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
this is intentional and you can skip it with ctrl-c https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/defaulting-to-verify-the-image-integrity- before-installing-on-desktop/13472 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1876862] Re: Missing v3d driver disables 3D support on RPi4

2020-05-13 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
adding bionic since we're supposed to fully support the pi4 there too ** Also affects: linux-raspi (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1873797] Re: add_mountroot_fail_hook is either buggy or not used properly, causes boot problems

2020-05-13 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
pleas use 1878378 for further discussion of that issue, there is no relation at all to initramfs-tools-ubuntu-core ** Changed in: initramfs-tools-ubuntu-core (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1877852] Re: Evolution not showing unread count in dock, missing build-dep

2020-05-11 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
seems installing evolution-indicator solves it without re-compiling ... closing the bug as invalid ... ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1877852] [NEW] Evolution not showing unread count in dock, missing build-dep

2020-05-10 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported: Evolution has the ability to show the unread messages count in the Dock app icon, this works for the Ubuntu Dock GNOME extension as well as for Dash to Dock and indeed the old unity7 dock ... simply re-compiling the current focal evolution package with an added libunity-dev

[Bug 1877852] Re: Evolution not showing unread count in dock, missing build-dep

2020-05-10 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
** Attachment added: "evo-counter.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1877852/+attachment/5369430/+files/evo-counter.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1875493] Re: [core] log rotation doesn't properly restart rsyslogd

2020-05-08 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
well, rsyslog is completely gone from core after UC16 ... how would you test that in UC18 or UC20 to verify SRUs ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875493 Title: [core] log rotation

[Bug 1575053] Re: Please move the "$HOME/snap" directory to a less obtrusive location

2020-05-08 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
to move the content of the dir you might be able to: stop all snap apps ... mv ~/snap /whereever/your/bigger/disk/is/mounted mkdir ~/snap sudo mount --bind /whereever/your/bigger/disk/is/mounted/snap ~/snap you might need to adjust permissions on the target disk, the snap dir must be fully

[Bug 1575053] Re: Please move the "$HOME/snap" directory to a less obtrusive location

2020-04-30 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
To extend what zyga said above ... A major amount of snaps are used on appliance, embedded, IoT and server devices (in fact snaps were used in these environments for two years already before they came to the desktop at all). On many of these systemd XDG doesnt even remotely play a role so it was

[Bug 1872736] Re: install from USB to USB device wipes grub setup on NVME disk

2020-04-26 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
Sorry for the late reply, here is my /var/log/installer/syslog ** Attachment added: "/var/log/installer/syslog" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1872736/+attachment/5360826/+files/syslog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1873797] Re: add_mountroot_fail_hook is either buggy or not used properly, causes boot problems

2020-04-20 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
also ... i highly doubt that support for lvm2 is planned in UbuntuCore 20, this bug might rather be for the initramfs-tools package itself ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873797

[Bug 1872065] Re: 'writable' should not be introduced as a new label for persistence partition in Ubuntu 20.04

2020-04-20 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
side-note: /writable was introduced in 2014 FWIW -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872065 Title: 'writable' should not be introduced as a new label for persistence partition in

[Bug 1872736] Re: install from USB to USB device wipes grub setup on NVME disk

2020-04-14 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
Note that the install to USB seems to have done what it should just fine ... ...but that it wiped existing the bootloader on the internal disk that was explicitly de-selected everywhere is not okay. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1872736] [NEW] install from USB to USB device wipes grub setup on NVME disk

2020-04-14 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported: For a system test I prepared a USB stick with the current focal iso, booted from it and attempted an install to another (identical) USB disk. During partitioning /dev/sdb (the USB disk) was picked as target for the bootloader installation, a 63GB ext4 partition for / and a

[Bug 1866193] Re: error: too early for operation, device not yet seeded or device model not acknowledged

2020-03-06 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1864252 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864252 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1864252 preseeded snap installs fail in images -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1866058] [NEW] gadget hooks should not write to /root/snap by default

2020-03-04 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported: using a qemu image I recently noticed that there is a /root/snap/pc dir on the system ... the pc gadget ships an empty no-op configure hook that apparently gets run during seeding. since snapd knows what a gadget is, it would be nice if gadget hooks could by default made to

[Bug 1866002] [NEW] ubuntu-image should allow to disable console-conf at build time

2020-03-04 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported: currently various odd hacks exist to make sure that console-conf does not start up on appliance or kiosk systems that are supposed to be user- less and get managed only via the snapd REST API. to disable console-conf starting up the file /var/lib/console- conf/complete must

[Bug 1864162] Re: Don't install snap programs.

2020-02-22 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1864252 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864252 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1864252 preseeded snap installs fail in images -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1863214] Re: Add storage kernel modules for arm64/armhf build

2020-02-14 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
The pc-kernel snap is essentially just "linux-generic", sadly it was decided back then that the "linux-generic" name was not appropriate and that we would only build the kernel snap for amd64 in core16 In core 18 it was finally accepted to also build this kernel for both arm arches so that

[Bug 1852720] Re: docker snap suddenly installed by itself

2019-11-15 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
sadly snapd wipes the logs after a while so your snap changes start only at change 33 and this is only a refresh of the already installed docker snap ... it would be interesting to know why/how it got installed in the first place, perhaps someone from the snapd team has a hint here ... do you

[Bug 1852720] Re: docker snap suddenly installed by itself

2019-11-15 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
unattended-updates do not deal with snap packages (effectively snaps care for their upgrades themselves, there is no external entity like unattended-upgrades needed)... also snap packages do not "just install themselves", something must have actively triggered that ... along with syslog (or

[Bug 1850977] Re: Snap installs software without user having sudo access

2019-11-14 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
the requirement for policykit (and dropping of gksu/gksudo) came with the switch to gnome upstream, its a hard requirement for the desktop nowadays. while the default here might be wrong (and should be reviewed by someone from the desktop team), this is definitely not a snapd related bug. i added

[Bug 1850977] Re: Snap installs software without user having sudo access

2019-11-14 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
policyKit does not involve sudo in any way, it uses systemd-logind from the session to elevate privileges. if you are marked as admin in the policyKit setup you will indeed be able to do admin things no matter what is written in sudoers ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1851233] Re: building a snap from the eoan tree using the raspi2 defconfig results in gigantic snap package

2019-11-06 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
the included snapcraft.yaml means i need to have the whole tree locally on disk, as someone who maintains a ton of community images for UbuntuCore i prefer to just have the snapcraft.yaml locally so the disk is only cluttered during build. along with that i am trying to build the eoan tree for the

[Bug 1851233] Re: building a snap from the eoan tree using the raspi2 defconfig results in gigantic snap package

2019-11-06 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
well, as a user/customer building my own kernel i'd kind of expect the defconfig for a flavour to not be a debug config. but indeed you are correct, i should have taken a look at the included snapcraft.yaml which, despite being for the wrong flavour (generic/pc- kernel), indeed contains

[Bug 1851233] Re: building a snap from the eoan tree using the raspi2 defconfig results in gigantic snap package

2019-11-04 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
ok, this looks a bit more reasonable now ... $ ls -lh pi4-kernel_raspi2-5.3.0-1011.12_armhf.snap -rw-r--r-- 1 ogra ogra 211M Nov 4 17:05 pi4-kernel_raspi2-5.3.0-1011.12_armhf.snap so CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y should better be turned off by default for people building snaps from our trees ;) --

[Bug 1851233] Re: building a snap from the eoan tree using the raspi2 defconfig results in gigantic snap package

2019-11-04 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
yup, seems this is (surprisingly) on by default ... $ grep DEBUG_INFO parts/kernel/build/.config CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y # CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_REDUCED is not set # CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_SPLIT is not set CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF4=y # CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF is not set i'll try a re-build and override that

[Bug 1851233] Re: building a snap from the eoan tree using the raspi2 defconfig results in gigantic snap package

2019-11-04 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
i also tried using the "source-branch: raspi2" argument in the snapcraft.yaml instead of using teh master branch and the "source-tag:" option, but this results in the same big size ... additionally i'd like to remark that due to the transactional nature of UbuntuCore we need to keep the kernel

[Bug 1851233] [NEW] building a snap from the eoan tree using the raspi2 defconfig results in gigantic snap package

2019-11-04 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported: typically a kernel snap built from the kernel.ubuntu.com tree using the raspi2 defconfig results in a snap package that is below 150MB in size: $ ls -lh pi2-kernel_raspi2-4.4.0-1110.snap -rw--- 1 root root 129M Jun 4 15:01 pi2-kernel_raspi2-4.4.0-1110.snap trying to

[Bug 1560942] Re: Support swap

2019-11-02 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
n the yaml, this would be a snapd configuration task. ** Changed in: snappy Assignee: Oliver Grawert (ogra) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: ubuntu-core-config (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whi

[Bug 1796047] Re: update-ieee-data throws error because of wrong url

2019-10-22 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
** Also affects: ieee-data (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1796047 Title: update-ieee-data throws error because of wrong

[Bug 1844498] Re: 18.10+ cloud images have the LXD group as gid 1000

2019-10-10 Thread Oliver Grawert via ubuntu-bugs
note that the build scripts for core do have an md5sum check to detect changes to /etc/passwd|group|shadow because this file is orignally readonly. dirs created with specific UIDs/GIDs by package postinist scripts that get copied into the writable area of the rootfs during first boot would fail

[Bug 1838038] Re: [snap] Chromium does not work with .local mdns/avahi name resolution

2019-07-29 Thread Oliver Grawert
after a comment from jamesh in the forum discussion i found that installing nscd from universe works around the issue, but this does not change the fact that it is a regression of an ubuntu default feature, so there still needs to be some solution (snapd dependency on nscd and moving nscd back

[Bug 1838038] Re: [snap] Chromium does not work with .local mdns/avahi name resolution

2019-07-26 Thread Oliver Grawert
trying your test on any of my machines does not work here btw (so i assume it has nothing to do with running the server locally) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838038 Title: [snap]

[Bug 1838038] Re: [snap] Chromium does not work with .local mdns/avahi name resolution

2019-07-26 Thread Oliver Grawert
well, try something thats not on localhost, i know that i cant resolve anything in my LAN that uses mdns (note that this will also affect printing i guess) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >