[Bug 1650882] Re: Some sbackup messages in log are in Spanish
Fixed upstream in commit https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~sbackup-dev/sbackup/0.11/revision/289 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1650882 Title: Some sbackup messages in log are in Spanish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1650882/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1650882] Re: Some sbackup messages in log are in Spanish
I can confirm this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1650882 Title: Some sbackup messages in log are in Spanish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1650882/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1650882] Re: Some sbackup messages in log are in Spanish
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1650882 Title: Some sbackup messages in log are in Spanish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1650882/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1770528] Re: Purging of old backup - Simple cut-off is not happening
Hi, I was one of the main developers of Sbackup. I have devoted myself to other projects for quite some time now (leaving sbackup to others). Developers interested in this project come and go depending on their free time. This explains the time it took for you to have and answer to your questions. I want to praise you for the effort you put on analyzing the issue. In your example, the way you expected Sbackup to work is to do the action described bellow: 2018-04-25_22.00.11.927348.mcs-Ubuntu.ful/ <-- CUTOFF 2018-04-26_22.00.08.250440.mcs-Ubuntu.inc/ <-- CUTOFF 2018-04-27_22.00.07.487993.mcs-Ubuntu.inc/ <-- CUTOFF 2018-04-28_22.00.08.383888.mcs-Ubuntu.inc/ <-- CUTOFF 2018-04-29_22.00.06.820683.mcs-Ubuntu.inc/ <-- CUTOFF 2018-04-30_22.00.08.240341.mcs-Ubuntu.inc/ 2018-05-01_22.00.08.232810.mcs-Ubuntu.inc/ 2018-05-02_22.00.07.980758.mcs-Ubuntu.ful/ 2018-05-03_22.00.07.042217.mcs-Ubuntu.inc/ 2018-05-04_22.00.08.945832.mcs-Ubuntu.inc/ 2018-05-05_22.00.07.219102.mcs-Ubuntu.inc/ 2018-05-06_22.00.08.145880.mcs-Ubuntu.inc/ 2018-05-07_22.00.08.746766.mcs-Ubuntu.inc/ 2018-05-08_22.00.08.245251.mcs-Ubuntu.inc/ 2018-05-09_22.00.07.699726.mcs-Ubuntu.ful/ However, doing this would leave 2 *orphans backups* 2018-04-30_22.00.08.240341.mcs-Ubuntu.inc/ 2018-05-01_22.00.08.232810.mcs-Ubuntu.inc/ What I call orphan backup here is a backup you would not be able to use (because you would not be able to revert a folder from it. Every Incremental backup has to have a parent (Full backup). So even with the Simple cutoff fonctionnality, we don't want you to lose the 2 incremental backups that would have been left on the disk. So Sbackup will only remove all the backups that are before the parent of the 2 inc backup. This explain the situation you got. I agree however that is not described in the documentation. I would welcome any suggestion on the way to describe it in a user friendly way. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770528 Title: Purging of old backup - Simple cut-off is not happening To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1770528/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 927636] Re: plymouthd crashed with SIGSEGV in script_obj_deref_direct()
** Attachment added: "plymouth-debug.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/927636/+attachment/4705156/+files/plymouth-debug.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927636 Title: plymouthd crashed with SIGSEGV in script_obj_deref_direct() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/plymouth/+bug/927636/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 927636] Re: plymouthd crashed with SIGSEGV in script_obj_deref_direct()
Still happening on Xenial. The workaround suggested is not valid in xenial anymore. The suggested directory might now be /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/plymouth -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927636 Title: plymouthd crashed with SIGSEGV in script_obj_deref_direct() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/plymouth/+bug/927636/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1218309] Re: Gnome-shell freeze
Hello, Seeing the number of subscription to this bug, I believe it also affect a huge number of users. In fact, I usually use Unity. I had no problem. Then I installed gnome shell and started using it. It usually freezes out of the blue after 1 hour usage. As mentioned by the OP the mouse moves but you can click wherever you want, you won't get any result. In the end, I stopped using gnome-shell, even if I must admit that, to my taste, the Shell beats Unity. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1218309 Title: Gnome-shell freeze To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1218309/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84899] Re: SSH with GSSAPIAuthentication option on SSH servers are very slow
Hi, I have the same opinion as chifamba. People start thinking that SSH on Ubuntu is slow. I had also the same opinion before seeing this bug in Launchpad. -- SSH with GSSAPIAuthentication option on SSH servers are very slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84899 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 249292] Re: Simple backup Regex for Trash to be changed for using gvfs
I believe that SBackup has been updated on lucid. I suggest that you try NSsbackup. Look for it on Launchpad. -- Simple backup Regex for Trash to be changed for using gvfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 328902] Re: Spelling and wording errors
** Changed in: nssbackup Milestone: release0.2 => 0.2rc8 ** Changed in: nssbackup Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- Spelling and wording errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328902 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 328902] Re: Spelling and wording errors
** Changed in: nssbackup Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: nssbackup Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) ** Changed in: nssbackup Milestone: None => release0.2 -- Spelling and wording errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328902 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 311429] Re: simple-backup-config.py crashed with NoOptionError in get()
Hi, Can you test the following ? https://launchpad.net/nssbackup/+announcement/2189 It's NSsbackup. It will be the new version of Sbackup. It's the supported version of Sbackup. We (NSsbackup team) don't change Sbackup anymore. We will push to have NSsbackup replacing Sbackup in the repositories. It can upgrade previous versions of Sbackup version. But I anyway suggest that you backup your Sbackup confguration and move your backup folder before testing. -- simple-backup-config.py crashed with NoOptionError in get() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370214] Re: [Jaunty] Xorg FPS dropped down drastically
Hi Bryce, Is it really a won't fix, just because I have not attached the required information. I believe the status should be Incomplete and not Won't Fix (unless you have some others reasons that I don't know). Regards ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Status: Won't Fix => Incomplete -- [Jaunty] Xorg FPS dropped down drastically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370214 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370214] Re: [Jaunty] Xorg FPS dropped down drastically
** Attachment added: "report-jauty.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26203598/report-jauty.txt ** Tags added: regression-release ** Description changed: Binary package hint: xorg Hi, I have noticed that since my upgrade to Jaunty I have a drastic drop of my FPS reported by glxgears. To ensure that it was not the old driver that was borked after the upgrade, I tested with Intrepid and Jaunty Live CDs. Here I attach the reports that I have computed on the problem on the 2 systems. + => on Intrepid + 6555 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1310.811 FPS + 6690 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1337.869 FPS + 6631 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1326.031 FPS + 6574 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1314.737 FPS + + => on Jaunty + 2251 frames in 5.0 seconds = 450.157 FPS + 2285 frames in 5.0 seconds = 456.949 FPS + + Description: Ubuntu 9.04 Release: 9.04 Regards -- [Jaunty] Xorg FPS dropped down drastically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370214 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370214] Re: [Jaunty] Xorg FPS dropped down drastically
** Attachment added: "report-intrepid.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26203588/report-intrepid.txt -- [Jaunty] Xorg FPS dropped down drastically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370214 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370214] [NEW] [Jaunty] Xorg FPS dropped down drastically
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg Hi, I have noticed that since my upgrade to Jaunty I have a drastic drop of my FPS reported by glxgears. To ensure that it was not the old driver that was borked after the upgrade, I tested with Intrepid and Jaunty Live CDs. Here I attach the reports that I have computed on the problem on the 2 systems. => on Intrepid 6555 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1310.811 FPS 6690 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1337.869 FPS 6631 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1326.031 FPS 6574 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1314.737 FPS => on Jaunty 2251 frames in 5.0 seconds = 450.157 FPS 2285 frames in 5.0 seconds = 456.949 FPS Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 Regards ** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: regression-release -- [Jaunty] Xorg FPS dropped down drastically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370214 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363139] Re: xbmc not working with opensource radeon driver in jaunty
** Tags added: regression-release -- xbmc not working with opensource radeon driver in jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Nssbackup-team] [Bug 229218] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with ValueError in ()
@Anton: In fact, we are supposed to support Sbackup also. This is why we receive the notification about Sbackup bugs. What I suggest it to propose to Sbackup users to try to reproduce using NSsbackup (since it will be the replacement of Sbackup). @MrWoo: Are you sure you reported on the right bug ? I don't see the link between Evince and Sbackup ... ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- sbackupd.py crashed with ValueError in () https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229218 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 229218] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with ValueError in ()
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- sbackupd.py crashed with ValueError in () https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229218 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350141] Re: update-notifier crashed with SIGSEGV [non-native unknown package]
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24443862/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24443863/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24443864/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24443865/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "Registers.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24443866/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: "Stacktrace.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24443867/Stacktrace.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- update-notifier crashed with SIGSEGV [non-native unknown package] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 243344] Re: scim-bridge crashed with SIGSEGV in scim::IMEngineInstanceBase::get_frontend_data()
This issue is happening to me every startup :-( -- scim-bridge crashed with SIGSEGV in scim::IMEngineInstanceBase::get_frontend_data() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350128] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:719 check_for_bios_corruption+0xc8/0xd0()
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24443278/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "OopsText.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24443279/OopsText.txt -- WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:719 check_for_bios_corruption+0xc8/0xd0() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350128 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350128] [NEW] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:719 check_for_bios_corruption+0xc8/0xd0()
Public bug reported: I got this warning at startup. ProblemType: KernelOops Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be restarted. Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Failure: oops NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.38 SourcePackage: linux-meta Title: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:719 check_for_bios_corruption+0xc8/0xd0() Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-kerneloops i386 -- WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:719 check_for_bios_corruption+0xc8/0xd0() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350128 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176838] Re: Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring
Fixed in 0.2rc 7 ** Changed in: nssbackup Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176838 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176838] Re: Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring
Fixed on 0.2 branch. ** Changed in: nssbackup Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176838 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176838] Re: Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring
I really don't think this problem is still present on 0.2 RC 6. Currently, the full file list is shown from an incremental snapshot with the precision is the file is included or not. Then on can restore a non-included file using the "revert" and "revert as" button, which will get the latest version of this file (starting from the selected snapshot) I believe this solves the issue. However, an improvement can be added by disabling the "restore" and "restore as" button, when a non included file is selected. ** Changed in: nssbackup Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176838 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 338878] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23557055/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23557056/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23557057/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23557058/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23557059/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "Registers.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23557060/Registers.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338878 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333996] Re: totem-gstreamer-video-thumbnailer crashed with SIGSEGV
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23077908/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23077909/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23077910/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23077911/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23077912/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "Registers.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23077913/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23077914/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- totem-gstreamer-video-thumbnailer crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317761] Re: debuild doesn't take "*.a" file anymore in the sources
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- debuild doesn't take "*.a" file anymore in the sources https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317761 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317761] Re: debuild doesn't take "*.a" file anymore in the sources
Here is my log file. I don't have a .devscripts in my HOME directory. By the way, are you using intrepid for your tests ? ** Attachment added: "test_1.0-1_source.build" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21295728/test_1.0-1_source.build -- debuild doesn't take "*.a" file anymore in the sources https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317761 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315774] Re: libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Assignee: Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) => (unassigned) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315774] Re: libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid
** Attachment removed: "samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21290166/samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff ** Attachment added: "samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21290586/samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff -- libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315774] Re: libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid
Debdiff attached. ** Attachment added: "samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21290166/samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff -- libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315774] Re: libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid
** Attachment added: "This patch comes from the Upstream commit" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21288671/recover_smbc_urlencode.patch ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315774] Re: libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid
Quoting the developer commit: == [Bug 6022] smbc_urlencode and smbc_urldecode were not exported - Since the revamp of libsmbclient, there has still been an external declaration for smbc_urlencode and smbc_urldecode in libsmbclient.h, yet those functions were renamed and made private. The two choices were to remove the function names from libsmbclient.h or to make them public again. The reported requested that they be public. This commit makes it so. Derrell ** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #6022 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6022 ** Also affects: samba via https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6022 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315774] Re: libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid
I tested and indeed, the smbc_urlencode symbol defined in the header is not found in the libsmbclient.a file on intrepid but is found in hardy (3.0.28a-1ubuntu4). I am trying to figure out is this is due to the sources or to a wrong build. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315774] Re: libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) -- libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317761] Re: debuild doesn't take "*.a" file anymore in the sources
Oki, Here is an example I have made. On intrepid, when running debuild -S -sa, the orig file doesn't contain the .a files. ** Attachment added: "tests.zip" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21270813/tests.zip -- debuild doesn't take "*.a" file anymore in the sources https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317761 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317761] Re: debuild doesn't take "*.a" file anymore in the sources
Hi, I am not home for the moment so I can't provide a build.log right now but I can give you a link to the sources I wanted to pack on intrepid. https://edge.launchpad.net/~team-xbmc-svn/+archive * xbmc_8.10final1svn17113-hardy1.diff.gz (6.6 KiB) * xbmc_8.10final1svn17113-hardy1.dsc (1.7 KiB) * xbmc_8.10final1svn17113.orig.tar.gz (121.3 MiB) Getting those, you can unpack them and try to repack using "debuild -S -sa", you migth notice a diff between the two packages. I will try to create a smaller example to reproduce, when I get home. -- debuild doesn't take "*.a" file anymore in the sources https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317761 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317761] Re: debuild doesn't take "*.a" file anymore in the sources
Looking at the changelog in http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.14.20ubuntu6/changelog , I believe it version 1.14.17 that broke debuild. Not including some binaries in the sources is IMO a good choice, but we should at least have a way to tell dpkg-source to include them (bypassing the default). ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: devscripts => dpkg -- debuild doesn't take "*.a" file anymore in the sources https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317761 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317761] [NEW] debuild doesn't take "*.a" file anymore in the sources
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: devscripts Hi, I noticed on intrepid that debuild doesn't take the .a files in the sources anymore. Thus I am not able to build my package which has some binaries inside the sources. The problem is not happening when using hardy. I was obliged to roll my whole OS back to hardy cause of this issue. I found no way to specify to debuild to take the binary inside the source. The source format I am using is Format 1.0 Regards wattazoum hardy version : 2.10.39ubuntu2~hardy1 Intrepid version: 2.10.39ubuntu2~intrepid1 The problem may also be in dpkg-source ... dpkg-dev hardy version : 1.14.16.6ubuntu4 dpkg-dev intrepid version : 1.14.20ubuntu6 ** Affects: devscripts (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- debuild doesn't take "*.a" file anymore in the sources https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317761 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 283580] Re: glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV
Here is the requested file ** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21046711/lspci-vvnn.txt ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-177 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291308] Re: sbackup fills HDD when target is unmounted
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Also affects: sbackup Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: sbackup Importance: Undecided => Medium Status: New => Confirmed ** Also affects: nssbackup Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nssbackup Importance: Undecided => Medium Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) Status: New => Confirmed Target: None => release0.2 -- sbackup fills HDD when target is unmounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191127] Re: simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules
** Changed in: nssbackup Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed Target: None => release0.2 -- simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 130856] Re: ( wishlist )sbackup time to completion??
** Also affects: nssbackup Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nssbackup Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- ( wishlist )sbackup time to completion?? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130856 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 289192] Re: bzr crashed with SIGSEGV in svn_swig_py_array_to_list()
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18889834/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18889835/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18889836/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18889837/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18889838/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "Registers.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18889839/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: "Stacktrace.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18889840/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18889841/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- bzr crashed with SIGSEGV in svn_swig_py_array_to_list() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289192 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277633] Re: wireless doesn't work in 8.10 beta
Moving status to confirm as there are 3 people to confirm it. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Summary changed: - wireless doesn't work in 8.10 beta + wireless (Atheros AR5007EG) doesn't work anymore in 8.10 beta -- wireless (Atheros AR5007EG) doesn't work anymore in 8.10 beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277633] Re: wireless doesn't work in 8.10 beta
I have the same problem on my Fujitsu SiEMENS Amilo Pa2548. On Apha 6 the WIFI was working fine and when I upgraded to the new kernel 2.6.27-7-generic I lost my connection. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci | grep Ethernet 00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: nVidia Corporation MCP67 Ethernet (rev a2) 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR242x 802.11abg Wireless PCI Express Adapter (rev 01) I installed a modified Hal to have it working : http://madwifi.org/ticket/1192 -- wireless (Atheros AR5007EG) doesn't work anymore in 8.10 beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 283580] Re: glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18551664/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18551665/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18551666/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18551667/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18551668/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "Registers.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18551669/Registers.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278439] Re: rapidsvn crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18229207/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18229208/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18229209/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18229210/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18229211/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "Registers.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18229212/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: "Stacktrace.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18229213/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18229214/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- rapidsvn crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278439 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 275259] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18005746/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18005747/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18005748/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18005749/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "Registers.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18005750/Registers.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275259 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176838] Re: Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring
Sorry if I was quite rude. According to your answer, I understand that you're not the kind of users I were talking about. You are also able to admit your mistakes and I am really impressed. This was really a wording issue. And I also apologize as I over reacted. As for this Bug report, I think it's fixed in NSsbackup (which will be in version 0.3 the new version of Sbackup : sbackup 1.1). I will add NSsbackup as an impacted software.Then you can check if you still find this bug or if you want some improvements. https://edge.launchpad.net/nssbackup You should test it with version 0.2 beta . There is a ppa available for NSsbackup which is NSsbackup team PPA. I need to take time to work on NSsbackup 0.3/Sbackup 1.1 ... ** Also affects: nssbackup Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nssbackup Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) Target: None => release0.2 -- Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176838 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176838] Re: Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring
@francesco: One would say : "This is why the source code is open. If you want to add something to the software, just do it (or find someone who can do it for you". I really hate this kind of comment. "and which is only excusable because of " !!! This software is made by developers on their free time, they earn nothing from it, they don't sell it. Moreover they open the code. Would you take some of your free time to do that ? If the answer is yes, then please fix this "misfeature" and submit your patch to the developers or to this bug report. This said, I would like both of you to know that the main developer of Sbackup is currently busy and he will most likely not take the time to answer this kind of comment. -- Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176838 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 144295] Re: Wishlist: Automatically split tar files at max size for filesystem
** Changed in: nssbackup Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- Wishlist: Automatically split tar files at max size for filesystem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144295 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149865] Re: [Wishlist] Option not to gzip
0.2 beta 5 ** Changed in: nssbackup Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- [Wishlist] Option not to gzip https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 141002] Re: wish for multiple parallel backups
0.2 beta 5 ** Changed in: nssbackup Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- wish for multiple parallel backups https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141002 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 87312] Re: xsane takes my TV card for a scanner
I can tell you without removing my TV card that XSANE doesn't recognize my scanner. But that's another issue. I have opened this report because it takes my TV card for a scanner, not because the scanner is not recognized. Both are different issues indeed. ** Changed in: xsane (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- xsane takes my TV card for a scanner https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/87312 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 87312] Re: xsane takes my TV card for a scanner
This is still happening on Hardy : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg-query --show xsane xsane 0.995-1ubuntu1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 8.04 Release:8.04 Codename: hardy lspci gives the same output. The scanner is still the same also. ** Changed in: xsane (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- xsane takes my TV card for a scanner https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/87312 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 229218] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with ValueError in ()
Hello, This looks like a configuration issue. Can you give the dirconfig part of your configuration file? I believe there is some entries that are invalid. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) Status: New => Incomplete -- sbackupd.py crashed with ValueError in () https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229218 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 150277] Re: curlftpfs-0.9.1 + libcurl/7.16.4 segfaults on removing files
I confirm that it doesn't fix the issue. -- curlftpfs-0.9.1 + libcurl/7.16.4 segfaults on removing files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 150277] Re: curlftpfs-0.9.1 + libcurl/7.16.4 segfaults on removing files
Hello, Any inputs on this one ? Regards -- curlftpfs-0.9.1 + libcurl/7.16.4 segfaults on removing files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209314] Re: Crash "No Such File Or Directory"
Thank you for your bug report. After your comments, I believe I can safely put this bug as invalid. right ? just tell me if I should reopen it . Regards ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) Status: New => Invalid -- Crash "No Such File Or Directory" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209314 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 113659] Re: [apport] olive-gtk crashed with PathNotChild in relpath()
Looking at the traceback, and after doing some tests, I have noticed that this bug happens when there is a symlink in the path to the bzr branch . ** Changed in: bzr-gtk (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- [apport] olive-gtk crashed with PathNotChild in relpath() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113659 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 207930] Re: olive-gtk crashed with PathNotChild in relpath()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 113659 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113659 ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12925767/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12925768/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12925769/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "Traceback.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12925770/Traceback.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 113659 [apport] olive-gtk crashed with PathNotChild in relpath() -- olive-gtk crashed with PathNotChild in relpath() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207930 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 207930] [NEW] olive-gtk crashed with PathNotChild in relpath()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 113659 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113659 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bzr-gtk Binary package hint: bzr-gtk ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Mar 27 20:59:37 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/olive-gtk InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.5 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ath_hal Package: bzr-gtk 0.93.0-1 PackageArchitecture: all ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/olive-gtk ProcEnviron: PATH=/opt/Maven/apache-maven-2.0.8/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/olive-gtk'] SourcePackage: bzr-gtk Title: olive-gtk crashed with PathNotChild in relpath() Uname: Linux 2.6.24-12-generic i686 UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin plugdev sambashare video ** Affects: bzr-gtk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash need-duplicate-check -- olive-gtk crashed with PathNotChild in relpath() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207930 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 150277] Re: curlftpfs-0.9.1 + libcurl/7.16.4 segfaults on removing files
@John Dong: Can you please check and accept the debdiff ? @Walter Huf : More generally I think we shouldn't rely on backport to fix a bug on a stable release. Backports are meant just for new functionalities. Bugs should be fixed on every concerned supported release. So you're totally right. This is even more critical as curl is in main so is mean to be officially supported bu Ubuntu . I think you should open a bug on Ubuntu about this general matter. I'll second it. @Olexander: thank you for your fix :-) -- curlftpfs-0.9.1 + libcurl/7.16.4 segfaults on removing files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 204076] Re: exaile.py crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_tree_view_remove_column()
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12754795/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12754796/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12754797/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12754798/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12754799/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "Registers.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12754800/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: "Stacktrace.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12754801/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12754802/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- exaile.py crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_tree_view_remove_column() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204076 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 204076] [NEW] exaile.py crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_tree_view_remove_column()
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: exaile using Ubuntu 8.04 Bug in exaile 0.2.11.1-0ubuntu2 I expected to not have this bug . I just closed exaile and got this bug report. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Mar 19 23:41:39 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/share/exaile/exaile.py InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.5 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ath_hal Package: exaile 0.2.11.1-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: python /usr/lib/exaile/exaile.py ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash Signal: 11 SourcePackage: exaile StacktraceTop: gtk_tree_view_remove_column () ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 ?? () ?? () ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 Title: exaile.py crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_tree_view_remove_column() Uname: Linux 2.6.24-12-generic i686 UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin plugdev sambashare video ** Affects: exaile (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash -- exaile.py crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_tree_view_remove_column() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204076 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 3339] Re: Ubuntu grub should be deluxe and animated like OpenSUSE grub
@andrea : If I could vote for you being in the ubuntu design team, I would :-) . I agree 100% with what you said. -- Ubuntu grub should be deluxe and animated like OpenSUSE grub https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3339 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion.
Discussion is on going on the ubuntu-devel mailing list . https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel- discuss/2008-March/003575.html -- Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion.
@john : the easier way to test is to use my PPA https://help.ubuntu.com/7.10/add-applications/C/extra-repositories-adding.html . By the way it's on hardy , I didn't make those changes for gutsy. So you need to have hardy installed ( or to use a Virtual Machine - on VMware for instance) To rollback, you'll just have to do it in Synaptic and select the official version . Thanks for your help in testing -- Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion.
Just an idea that I had. Please tell me if it's valid and worth the effort : Currently we have 3 entries (by default) in the System > Administration menu for "Software management" (Synaptic, Update Manager, Software source) . I suppose others would have also "Adept" there. So maybe a submenu is needed for software. If we follow the same logic, some other submenu might be needed (like "Network Management") -- Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion.
* Rename menu items: Remote Desktop => Remote Access Rights ** Attachment added: "vino.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12654224/vino.patch -- Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion.
* Rename menu items in System > Administration * Network => Manage Network * Services => System Startup Services * Shared Folders => System Shared Folders * Time and Date => System Time and Date * Users and Groups => Manage Users and Groups ** Attachment added: "gnome-system-tools.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12648636/gnome-system-tools.patch -- Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion.
Packages available to test on my PPA. https://edge.launchpad.net/~wattazoum/+archive Please give me some feedbacks so that I can decide whether I do this change or not. -- Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion.
** Attachment added: "patch for the comment 6 change (gnome-menus)" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12648123/gnome-menus.patch -- Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion.
Well , actually I tried to add vino but with no success. So please just mention in a comment the package that needs to be patch. Affects : vino -- Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion.
Here is the list of desktop files that might be impacted : - Under System -> Administration : ~$ grep -e 'Categories=.*System' -r /usr/share/applications/* | grep "Settings" /usr/share/applications/displayconfig-gtk.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;Settings;HardwareSettings;System; /usr/share/applications/gnome-keyring-manager.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;System;Utility;Settings; /usr/share/applications/gnome-nettool.desktop:Categories=System;Settings;GNOME;GTK; /usr/share/applications/gnome-power-preferences.desktop:Categories=Settings;X-GNOME-SystemSettings; /usr/share/applications/gnome-system-log.desktop:Categories=GTK;GNOME;System;Settings /usr/share/applications/gnome-system-monitor.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;System;Settings;Monitor; /usr/share/applications/gparted.desktop:Categories=GNOME;System;Settings; /usr/share/applications/language-selector.desktop:Categories=Application;System;Settings; /usr/share/applications/network.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;System;Settings; /usr/share/applications/redhat-system-config-printer.desktop:Categories=GTK;Printing;HardwareSettings;Settings;System;X-Red-Hat-Base; /usr/share/applications/restricted-manager.desktop:Categories=RestrictedManager;GTK;System;Settings /usr/share/applications/services.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;System;Settings; /usr/share/applications/shares.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;System;Settings; /usr/share/applications/software-properties.desktop:Categories=Application;System;Settings; /usr/share/applications/synaptic.desktop:Categories=PackageManager;Applications;GTK;System;Settings /usr/share/applications/time.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;System;Settings; /usr/share/applications/update-manager.desktop:Categories=Application;System;Settings; /usr/share/applications/users.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;System;Settings; - Under System -> Preferences : ~$ grep -e 'Categories=.*Settings' -r /usr/share/applications/* | grep -v "System" | grep -v "Accessibility" /usr/share/applications/alacarte.desktop:Categories=GNOME;Settings;DesktopSettings; /usr/share/applications/bluetooth-properties.desktop:Categories=Settings; /usr/share/applications/ccsm.desktop:Categories=Compiz;Settings;DesktopSettings; /usr/share/applications/cddb-slave.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;Settings; /usr/share/applications/default-applications.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;Settings;X-GNOME-PersonalSettings; /usr/share/applications/display-properties.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;Settings;HardwareSettings; /usr/share/applications/gnome-about-me.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;Settings;X-GNOME-PersonalSettings; /usr/share/applications/gnome-appearance-properties.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;Settings;DesktopSettings; /usr/share/applications/gnomecc.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;Settings; /usr/share/applications/gnome-network-preferences.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;Settings;X-GNOME-NetworkSettings; /usr/share/applications/gnome-screensaver-preferences.desktop:Categories=Settings;DesktopSettings; /usr/share/applications/gnome-settings-mouse.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;Settings;HardwareSettings; /usr/share/applications/gnome-settings-sound.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;Settings;HardwareSettings; /usr/share/applications/gnome-volume-control.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;AudioVideo;Settings;HardwareSettings; /usr/share/applications/gnome-volume-properties.desktop:Categories=Application;Settings;GNOME; /usr/share/applications/gpilotd-control-applet.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;Application;Settings; /usr/share/applications/gstreamer-properties.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;Settings;HardwareSettings; /usr/share/applications/hal-device-manager.desktop:Categories=GNOME;Settings;HardwareSettings; /usr/share/applications/keybinding.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;Settings;X-GNOME-PersonalSettings; /usr/share/applications/keyboard.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;Settings;HardwareSettings; /usr/share/applications/nautilus-file-management-properties.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;Settings;X-GNOME-PersonalSettings; /usr/share/applications/redhat-my-default-printer.desktop:Categories=GTK;HardwareSettings;Settings;X-Red-Hat-Base; /usr/share/applications/scim-setup.desktop:Categories=Applications;Settings; /usr/share/applications/seahorse-pgp-preferences.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;Settings; /usr/share/applications/session-properties.desktop:Categories=Settings;X-GNOME-PersonalSettings; /usr/share/applications/tracker-preferences.desktop:Categories=Settings; /usr/share/applications/tsclient.desktop:Categories=GTK;GNOME;X-GNOME-NetworkSettings;Network; /usr/share/applications/vino-preferences.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;Settings;X-GNOME-NetworkSettings; /usr/share/applications/window-properties.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;Settings;DesktopSettings; Is there a subset of those entries that we can prioritize ? I would also love some help from anyone, to determine the packages from which those files come from . You can get it using a command like this one : ~$ dpkg -S /usr/share/applications/vino-preferences.des
[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under "System => Preferences" and "System => Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion.
Hello, This problem is indeed a naming issue but it's also due to a lack of communication. Even if we rename the menu entries, there will be some users not knowing (guessing?) where to go to do things. After some explanation one thinks it's logic to have those 2 entries, but if there is no help, documentation, screencasts, there is chances that one doesn't understand it. This is another problem though . Concerning this bug, I propose doing as the initial logger suggested and also rename : - System -> Preferences ==> System -> User Preferences - System -> Administration ==> System -> System Administration Problem is this bug need to be solved by patching every packages that has entries in those menus (unless there is another way to do it). And a wiki page needs to be written with this specification and there should be a lot of communication on this so that every developers knows about those specification. -- Launchers under "System => Preferences" and "System => Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under "System => Preferences" and "System => Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion.
I'll try to manage this one. I am not very used to managing Gnome Desktop preferences and settings so any mentoring is welcome :-) . Best regards ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) -- Launchers under "System => Preferences" and "System => Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under "System => Preferences" and "System => Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion.
There is a hot discussion on this topic on Brainstorm. http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/80/ According to the number of positive vote on this idea . I think this bug should be taken care off. -- Launchers under "System => Preferences" and "System => Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 164924] Re: [needs-packaging] Gladex
This won't be available for 0.4 cause I have started the work using the trunk branch. So I am changing the target to milestone 0.5. ** Changed in: gladex Target: None => 0.5 -- [needs-packaging] Gladex https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164924 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 164924] Re: [needs-packaging] Gladex
Hello, well, for the moment I am working on this bug Upstream. After the packaging strategy will be done, the bug should be easily fixable on Ubuntu. But as there is a kinda sync between upstream and Ubuntu (concerning this topic) I'll put this bug on progress status and attach the BZR branch I am working on (from Upstream) ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: gladex Assignee: Charles Edward Pax (pax) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- [needs-packaging] Gladex https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164924 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 164924] Re: [needs-packaging] Gladex
The code has been merged in the trunk branch. The packages shall be available starting with gladgardsex 0.5. Regards ** Changed in: gladex Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- [needs-packaging] Gladex https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164924 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 164924] Re: [needs-packaging] Gladex
Hello, I think this software is a great one, and, as recently I have learned packaging I think I can devote myself to this task. I'll contact you for further details. Regards wattazoum -- [needs-packaging] Gladex https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164924 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176838] Re: Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring
** Also affects: sbackup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176838 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191127] Re: simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules
Hello, Thank you for your patch. I appreciate a lot your motivation and help. I don't maintain Sbackup (at least for now) anymore but as you have submitted a patch, it would be nice to have it included in Ubuntu for other users. There is a plan to re-merge Sbackup and NSsbackup though. But that won't be for Hardy. So it's better having Ubuntu-dev patching Sbackup 0.10.4. As for Launchpad usage, by submitting your patch here, since I have set the Bug for all projects (NSsbackup, Sbackup Upstream and Sbackup (Ubuntu) ), the patch is available for all projects and all developers have been notified. As for the plan on Implementing logging in the software, it has been done on NSsbackup (information available on https://edge.launchpad.net/nssbackup/ ). You can easily install NSsbackup by Using NSsbackup-Team PPA ( https://edge.launchpad.net /~nssbackup-team/+archive ). Take the gutsy version (0.1-6) if you want something stable. Version 0.2 is the development version. I'll review you patch and add it to NSsbackup (I must admit that I was thinking that I've already fixed this bug :-( ). Best regards wattazoum -- simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 192571] Re: No support for fujitsu-siemens Amilo Pa2548
** Changed in: hotkey-setup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Attachment added: "hotkey-setup_0.1-17ubuntu21.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12045742/hotkey-setup_0.1-17ubuntu21.debdiff -- No support for fujitsu-siemens Amilo Pa2548 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192571 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 192571] Re: No support for fujitsu-siemens Amilo Pa2548
** Attachment added: "Futjitsu-siemens-pa2548-support.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12045610/Futjitsu-siemens-pa2548-support.patch -- No support for fujitsu-siemens Amilo Pa2548 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192571 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 192571] [NEW] No support for fujitsu-siemens Amilo Pa2548
Public bug reported: Hello, I have a fujitsu-siemens Amilo Pa2548 and the Volume keys doesn't work on Gutsy and Hardy. So I made a patch to add the support of those keys for it. Can you review it and upload on Gutsy and Hardy ? Best Regards Aziz ** Affects: hotkey-setup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- No support for fujitsu-siemens Amilo Pa2548 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192571 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191127] Re: simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules
oops, I meant Sbackup ** Also affects: sbackup Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: sbackup Status: New => Confirmed -- simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191127] Re: simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules
I confirm the Bug for NSsbackup also. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191127] Re: simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules
Hello, Thank you for this bug report. NSsbackup has indeed the same problem. About your question, I recommend you post a patch here and upstream. But I don't think the upstream project is maintained anymore. You'll have more chance of having your patch in Ubuntu by posting it here. Best regards wattazoum ** Also affects: nssbackup Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nssbackup Importance: Undecided => High Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) Status: New => Confirmed -- simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188288] Re: NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file
well the patch has been rejected by the nautilus-list so , I am closing this bug . ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid -- NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188288 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188288] Re: NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file
Well, actually, the piece of code that you gave works fine and well. But in my case, i wanted to get the label of the NautilusMenuItem, and I didn't find a way to do this. There is AFAIK no way to get the details of a menu once it's set. If there is, this is the solution I am looking for and there is no need for this patch. But then, maybe the header should be documented concerning this matter. One other point that made me thinks this was a bug was this comment (in the nautilus-menu.h file). So the developer want the user to know what is in the MenuItem, but I didn't find any obvious way to get them once set. /* NautilusMenuItem has the following properties: * name (string)- the identifier for the menu item * label (string) - the user-visible label of the menu item * tip (string) - the tooltip of the menu item * icon (string)- the name of the icon to display in the menu item * sensitive (boolean) - whether the menu item is sensitive or not * priority (boolean) - used for toolbar items, whether to show priority * text. * menu (NautilusMenu) - The menu belonging to this item. May be null. */ -- NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188288 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188288] Re: NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file
I have subscribed to the list and resend the mail (and I have of course cancel the last one) -- NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188288 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 188288] Re: NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file
2008/2/6, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Could you mail the nautilus-list to get their comments on the change? Hello dear Nautilus masters :-) I have recently opened a bug on Launchpad and Gnome Bug tracker which is more a code organization issue than an improvement. Here is the description of the bug : Hello, I wanted to patch nautilus-action to add submenu support to it and I noticed that the struct _NautilusMenuItemDetails is not available in any of the nautilus extension headers. A search on the web showed me that it has been defined in the nautilus-menu-item.c source file. So we need to move it from this file to the header file. Otherwise it's not possible to use this struct in an external code. I have already made a patch. Best Regards So basically, Sebastien wanted to know what you think about this bug and patch before applying it to Ubuntu. I have attached the same patch to the Gnome Bug . Gnome bug : http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=513854 Launchpad bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188288 So basically the patch is just a move of a struct out of the source *.c file to the header. There is another struct that is defined in that source file but that is commented as Private in the header, so I didn't move it. Longing for your answer ... Best Regards Aziz > -- > NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188288 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188288 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188288] Re: NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file
This mail is waiting for an approval cause I am not a member of the list. -- NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188288 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188288] Re: NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file
** Changed in: nautilus Importance: Undecided => Unknown Bugwatch: None => GNOME Bug Tracker #513854 Status: New => Unknown -- NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188288 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188288] Re: NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file
I think I can confirm it since a patch is available. Regards ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188288 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
