Re: [Bug 474555] Re: Double-Declining depreciation to enter missing box salvage value
Sorry, but you've made the friction to find a resolution a bit too great for your customers. At some point Canonical needs to own the problem of bugs that their users are filing. If additional ticket need to be filed, go right ahead. I reported this bug over a year ago and have tried to provide help and information until now, but I no longer have a personal need for the proper functionality of this feature. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474555 Title: Double-Declining depreciation to enter missing box salvage value -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 474555] Re: Double-Declining depreciation to enter missing box salvage value
After testing in 10.10 RC, I can confirm that it is still not correctly calculating double-declining depreciation. The calculator's UI has changed, and something about the change has stopped it from presenting the error message; however, the calculation is still not performed correctly. As per my original post, there is no prompt for Salvage. Entering the other three values always calculates to a result of zero, which is obviously incorrect. A google search turns up several good sources for information regarding calculating double-declining depreciation. A few examples: http://accountinginfo.com/study/dep/depreciation-01.htm http://www.ehow.com/how_5098205_calculate-double-declining-depreciation.html http://www.investopedia.com/articles/06/depreciation.asp http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depreciation#Declining-balance_method_.28or_Reducing_balance_method.29 http://beginnersinvest.about.com/od/incomestatementanalysis/a/double-declining-balance-depreciation-method.htm Here is a web-based calculator that computes double-declining depreciation. You can see that it needs four input values to do it correctly. This one also prompts for a fifth value, months in a year. Obviously, it's fine for the calculator to assume 12 months, thus necessitating only four prompts. http://www.calculatorsoup.com/calculators/financial/depreciation-declining-double.php -- Double-Declining depreciation to enter missing box salvage value https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474555 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 474555] Re: Double-Declining depreciation to enter missing box salvage value
In Maverick, after clicking Dbd does it present you with three entry boxes or four? Is there a place to enter a Salvage value? The problem wasn't the error message, but the lack of a prompt for a Salvage value. In order to calculate double-declining depreciation, four values are necessary. The absence of the error message shows that something has changed. I just want to make sure that it's the right something. -- Double-Declining depreciation to enter missing box salvage value https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474555 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 474555] Re: Double-Declining depreciation to enter missing box salvage value
Just tried it in Lucid. The problem is still there, identical to how it was when I filed the bug in 9.04. -- Double-Declining depreciation to enter missing box salvage value https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474555 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599917] [NEW] xwax missing ttf-dejavu-extra package dependency
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xwax Installing xwax 0.7-4 from repos on 10.04 does not properly install the font DejaVuSans-Oblique.ttf, which is contained in the package ttf- dejavu-extra. xwax will not launch until this package has been installed. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: xwax 0.7-4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.36-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Jun 29 12:07:33 2010 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Netbook 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429.4) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: xwax ** Affects: xwax (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid ubuntu-une -- xwax missing ttf-dejavu-extra package dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599917 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599917] Re: xwax missing ttf-dejavu-extra package dependency
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51128382/Dependencies.txt -- xwax missing ttf-dejavu-extra package dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599917 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453524] Re: Track fails to load into player
xwax_import and xwax_scan have nothing to do with it. In fact, the same error is given when running xwax built from source as downloaded directly from xwax.co.uk, with the import and scan scripts present. I was able to get it to import tracks properly by purging mpg123 and ffmpeg, rebooting, reinstalling mpg123 and ffmpeg, and running xwax. I just tried it again, though, and that trick isn't working now. -- Track fails to load into player https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453524 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 474555] Re: Double-declining depreciation does not prompt for salvage value
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35109838/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35109839/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35109840/ProcStatus.txt -- Double-declining depreciation does not prompt for salvage value https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474555 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 474555] [NEW] Double-declining depreciation does not prompt for salvage value
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gcalctool When using the calculator in Financial mode, pressing the Ddb button for Double-declining depreciation should prompt for Cost, Salvage, Life, and Period. The prompt for Salvage is missing, and therefore cannot be entered. Consequently, the calculation cannot be performed. If the user enters in the values for only Cost, Life, and Period, the following message is displayed: Error: the number of periods must be positive I have confirmed the bug in both Ubuntu 9.04 and 9.10. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gcalctool NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: gcalctool 5.26.0-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gcalctool Uname: Linux 2.6.28-16-generic i686 ** Affects: gcalctool (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Double-declining depreciation does not prompt for salvage value https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474555 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459330] [NEW] Missing required font Vera.ttf
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xwax When trying to launch xwax from the command line, the following error is given: Font 'Vera.ttf' cannot be found in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-bitstream-vera /usr/share/fonts/ttf-bitstream-vera /usr/share/fonts/TTF. Apparently ttf-bitstream-vera has been removed from Karmic. See comment #14 here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ttf-bitstream-vera/+bug/12016 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Oct 23 12:00:17 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Netbook-Remix 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release Candidate i386 (20091020.2) Package: xwax 0.5-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic SourcePackage: xwax Tags: ubuntu-unr Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686 ** Affects: xwax (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug font i386 ttf-bitstream-vera ubuntu-unr vera vera.ttf xwax -- Missing required font Vera.ttf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459330 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459330] Re: Missing required font Vera.ttf
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34278700/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34278701/XsessionErrors.txt -- Missing required font Vera.ttf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459330 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459330] Re: Missing required font Vera.ttf
ttf-bitstream-vera does not seem to be in the repositories for a default installation of Karmic RC UNR. Is there another repository that's missing? -- Missing required font Vera.ttf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459330 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 284082] Re: INTEL_BATCH=1 not implemented in Intrepid ?
Conn, Executing glxgears with the vblank_mode variable set as you described makes no performance difference on my Acer Aspire One notebook. Likewise, disabling vertical sync using the driconf utility does not offer any performance gains in glxgears. Can you offer any further explanation or instruction? -- INTEL_BATCH=1 not implemented in Intrepid ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
