I'd say a simpler but still useful thing would be to make sure that if
some hardware isn't compatible at the time of release because a
proprietary driver is required (and that's the situation here - Unity
doesn't work on Nouveau), then a big, red note of that should be made
in the release notes
Timo - would it not be possible to put this driver in universe, as a service
for users who still have this chip?
I think it will become less relevant with time as I've not seen any newer
laptops/netbooks having using SiS 671, so it might just happen that when it is
finally merged with the FD.o,
Algo, ubuntu is not really at fault here, it's more to do with the
relationship between nvidia and xorg developers.
On 28/04/2011, Algo 741...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Very very trouble!
Last time upgrade to Ubuntu 10.10, I got deep trouble with nvidia-96.
This time upgrade to Ubuntu 11.04,
Thanks, it seems to fix it :-).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719446
Title:
systematic freezes on any kernel version post 2.6.35-22
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Description changed:
Package has broken dependencies that cannot be met.
xorg-video-abi-8.0
xserver-xorg-core (= 2:1.8.99.905-1ubuntu3)
Steps to reproduce:
- 1. Install Natty alpha 3 do sudo apt-get upgrade and dist-upgrade
+ 1. Install Natty beta do sudo apt-get upgrade and
** Also affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-96 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-96 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Also affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in:
Sorry for setting this to nvidia-graphics-drivers - I wasn't sure how to
set the bug as affecting multiple packages?
** Summary changed:
- [natty] nvidia-96 dependencies not met
+ [natty] nvidia binary packages for older cards - dependencies not met
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-96
Tim - Ok, I'll do that soon.
Alan - code in the patch that I bisected this to is ran when RAM is
getting full, so to make sure it occurs with more RAM added you'd need
to fill it up (GIMP with a large canvas works for me). My machine is
also single CPU but a Celeron - I'll post the exact infos
Some short but intensive testing seems to indicate that, for me, Natty
kernel doesn't have this problem, which is good news.
It seems (but I didn't have a chance to test yet) that the fix might be
this patch from upstream:
Alan - Yes, this page (and emails you should receive if there are any
updates!) should be the best way of knowing when a fix is officially
committed - packages containing it should appear fairly soon afterwards.
If there's any critical patch added to the kernel, you would need to
rebuild it
Yann, I'm going to mark this bug as invalid, as it's next to impossible to find
a culprit of a software problem if hardware is unreliable. If you're suffering
from https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719446 , then it is already triaged with
high priority so it will be fixed. If you're suffering
Most likely reason is that your RAM is damaged and you need to replace
it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706532
Title:
[Regression] Freezes since kernel 2.6.35-23
--
ubuntu-bugs
Some other hardware problems are also possible, but less likely.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706532
Title:
[Regression] Freezes since kernel 2.6.35-23
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Public bug reported:
Package has broken dependencies that cannot be met.
xorg-video-abi-8.0
xserver-xorg-core (= 2:1.8.99.905-1ubuntu3)
Steps to reproduce:
1. Install Natty alpha 3 do sudo apt-get upgrade and dist-upgrade
2. Try sudo apt-get install nvidia-96 to get the error.
** Affects:
Yann, first of all can you test your RAM for defects?
Hold left shift key while powering on your computer to see GRUB boot menu and
select memory test from there. You should run it for a few hours (probably best
overnight) and see if there are any errors reported at the bottom of the screen
(in
May I just add - as mentioned in one of my posts above, the commit just
preceding the one I bisected this bug to may be related, as on the system where
this bug occurs there are some very short (quarter to half a second?) freezes
in cases when this bug occurs, instead of a hard freeze, which
Dave,
Any chance the importance of this bug can be increased?
Looking at the code of the offending comment it may affect anyone running stock
kernel on single core processor (the code is ifdeffed-out for non-SMP build
configurations).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Alan: you need to install linux-
headers-2.6.35-28-generic_2.6.35-28.49_i386.deb after installing linux-
headers-2.6.35-28_2.6.35-28.49_all.deb to get Virtual Box driver to
compile.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you
you don't need to install linux-
headers-2.6.35-28-generic_2.6.35-28.49_i386.deb (it's only if you want
to have programs dependend on DKMS working with that particular kernel,
like VirtualBox).
If you DO want to install the headers, start terminal and go to the
folder where your sources sit (if
linux-image is your kernel, which should now appear when you start your
computer.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719446
Title:
systematic freezes on any kernel version post 2.6.35-22
(sorry for flooding your mailboxes)
Here's a tutorial how to bisect the kernel:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/KernelBisection
should you really want to do it. It is a bit time-consuming.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Kernel compilation produces a lot of warnings and it's ok, as long as it
gives you a 'final product' in the form of .deb packages. Errors (as
opposed to warnings) will stop the compilation and not produce a .deb
package.
To remove packages installed via build dep, you can use this helpful tip:
Looks like the effects of apt being interrupted while it was doing
something before. It shouldn't matter for kernel compilation, but you
may want to uninstall and reinstall VirtualBox at some point (which
should fix the error). You do need the build-dep linux though, so if the
error occured
Oh, and VirtualBox won't be enabled in kernel that you compile - you
would need to create and install kernel headers for your git source for
that; you can do this by running:
fakeroot debian/rules binary-indep
after building the kernel, which would give you linux-headers(...)
package which you
Ok, so this commit is related to this bug (after bisection):
58e15f5029c75b45adbcb25cd76a36d26a6c4297 is the first bad commit
commit 58e15f5029c75b45adbcb25cd76a36d26a6c4297
Author: Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com
Date: Thu Sep 9 16:38:17 2010 -0700
mm: page allocator: calculate a better
Also, it seems that the main factor in replicability of this bug is a
single-core processor running a SMP kernel (which is stock in Ubuntu) -
any chance someone more knowledgeable in kernel development can have a
look at this ?
N.B. Alan, yes, I could have started with 2.6.35-23 - this would have
Dave - if Alan verifies this with the HEAD of maverick kernel repository
with this patch reverted, would that be a good-enough proof, or should
he verify it with the HEAD of mainline kernel with this patch reverted?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Alan - Are you able and willing to build your own kernel? Risks are more
or less the same as for installing a development kernel, but it takes a
bit of time to compile. If you don't want to build a kernel, but are
willing to trust me enough to test one I built, I'll post a generic
build here
I'm also having this problem and willing to do a git bisect to find the
offending patch. Will get back with any results later.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719446
Title:
systematic
(N.B, it happens for me with 2.6.35.27 as well, so I'm bisecting
2.6.35-22 and 2.6.35-25.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719446
Title:
systematic freezes on any kernel version post
I've written to maintainer of the satux driver, and he said that their
driver is based on code from here : http://www.linuxconsulting.ro/xorg-
drivers/ with some patches. He promised to publish them on his blog -
but haven't done this yet, apparently.
--
no working driver for sis 671/771 video
hmmm... Stupid question - you are running it from GUI, not console??
You may also try to run dexconf first, just to reset xorg.conf to
whatever it thinks is default and then try again. (it looks like
displayconfig-gtk couldn't get screen size - I'd report this as a
separate bug. It's still a
Emm why not just try:
sudo apt-get install displayconfig-gtk
sudo displayconfig-gtk
--
[HARDY] xserver-xorg does not auto-configure correctly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207409
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
A patch which OpenSuse uses, extracted from RPMS.
** Attachment added: gdm-2.8.0.7-domain-entry.patch
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15414920/gdm-2.8.0.7-domain-entry.patch
--
GDM support for domain choice
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192599
You received this bug notification because you
This patch is used by the current version of OpenSuse (gdm 2.20, at
least), so please ignore version in file-name.
--
GDM support for domain choice
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192599
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
Also, to see the domain selection box, likewise open should probably be
patched to add/remove ShowDomain=true to/from the config file
--
GDM support for domain choice
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192599
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team,
A patch which OpenSuse uses, extracted from RPMS.
** Attachment added: gdm-2.8.0.7-domain-entry.patch
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15414920/gdm-2.8.0.7-domain-entry.patch
--
GDM support for domain choice
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192599
You received this bug notification because you
This patch is used by the current version of OpenSuse (gdm 2.20, at
least), so please ignore version in file-name.
--
GDM support for domain choice
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192599
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Also, to see the domain selection box, likewise open should probably be
patched to add/remove ShowDomain=true to/from the config file
--
GDM support for domain choice
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192599
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
hmmm, what I did now is just setting the machine domain (there is an
option in the administration menu in Ubuntu to do this) to be the same
as the full domain name of windows - and now I have removed the
/etc/hosts entries and for me it's still working.
lilbudda - I never tried using Evo with
Am I wrong in thinking that dexconf should generate xorg.conf which
would use vesa and 800x600 resolution, which should always work, and be
a good starting point?
--
[HARDY] xserver-xorg does not auto-configure correctly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207409
You received this bug notification
Hi,
I observe exactly the same symptoms - when I try subscribing to another
person folder, I cannot access it because of generic error. I have
full mailbox rights to that other mailbox, so I don't have problems
accessing it as http://exchange_server/exchange/other-mailbox using my
own login
Ok, I found a solution - this may be silly, but works. I have added ip
addresses and host names of:
- exchange OWA server
- primary DC
- secondary DC
(last two for compatibility with GAL).
to /etc/hosts . I've done two entries for each of them ( one with the
sole host name, the other one as a
43 matches
Mail list logo
