[Bug 1735594] Re: [regression] compiz crashes after Mesa upgrade
I got it to work, and it fixes my problem with the launcher resulting in an unknown file error on /usr/bin/compiz. Go to Software & Updates via command line ubuntu-software & and selecting it from a list of apt applications. Use Developer Options to enable xenial-proposed. Then run command line: sudo apt-get install libgl1-mesa-dri/xenial-proposed This installed it for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735594 Title: [regression] compiz crashes after Mesa upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1735594/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735594] Re: [regression] compiz crashes after Mesa upgrade
This bug needs fixed for the following: 7.6 GiB Intel® Core™ i5 CPU M 480 @ 2.67GHz × 4 Intel® Ironlake Mobile 64-bit Sorry I didn't add a comment elsewhere; not enough "Reputation Points" GAH!~ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735594 Title: [regression] compiz crashes after Mesa upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1735594/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735594] Re: [regression] compiz crashes after Mesa upgrade
How about withdrawing the update that causes this until fixed? Or, publishing some kind of advisory that doesn't require searching many threads to find??? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735594 Title: [regression] compiz crashes after Mesa upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1735594/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1459235] Re: Google Address book: Unable to open address book
I am experiencing "The requested resource was not found: https://developers.google.com/accounts/docs/AuthForInstalledApps; on Ubuntu 12.04 (precise) evolution 3.2.3. I see the last post here was 2016-09-21. Has this been fixed and when will it be pushed out to 12.04 LTS? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1459235 Title: Google Address book: Unable to open address book To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1459235/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1529999] Re: reporting per mtp-detect: droid razr hd not recognized
When will this be available for LTS versions? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152 Title: reporting per mtp-detect: droid razr hd not recognized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmtp/+bug/152/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1263355] Re: Unable to directly access files of any smartphone from Ubuntu
Make that 1.1.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1263355 Title: Unable to directly access files of any smartphone from Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmtp/+bug/1263355/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1263355] Re: Unable to directly access files of any smartphone from Ubuntu
Joining to add heat. I think this would be resolved if the latest libmtp (1.1.9) were put into the repository for all LTS versions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1263355 Title: Unable to directly access files of any smartphone from Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmtp/+bug/1263355/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1528064] Re: Libmtp out of date in Trusty LTS.
Also a problem on Precise(12.04LTS) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528064 Title: Libmtp out of date in Trusty LTS. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmtp/+bug/1528064/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1183658] Re: mtp + htc phone only partially functional
I seem to be having a similar problem mounting a DROID RAZR MAXX HD on Ubuntu 12.04LTS. Rather than submitting my own bug report, I have decided to join this one, hoping that sheer volume of complaints might force the issue into a higher priority bracket. Background information on what I have tried can be found in Launchpad Question 279679 and its links and references. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1183658 Title: mtp + htc phone only partially functional To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmtp/+bug/1183658/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1529999] [NEW] reporting per mtp-detect: droid razr hd not recognized
Public bug reported: On Ubuntu 12.04lts, mtp-detect reporst the following about a USB- connected Verizon DROID MAXX HD smartphone. Request that this be fixed. Device 0 (VID=22b8 and PID=2e62) is UNKNOWN. Please report this VID/PID and the device model to the libmtp development team PTP_ERROR_IO: failed to open session, trying again after resetting USB interface LIBMTP libusb: Attempt to reset device libmtp version: 1.1.3 Listing raw device(s) Found 1 device(s): 22b8:2e62 @ bus 2, dev 10 Attempting to connect device(s) Android device detected, assigning default bug flags USB low-level info: Interface has a kernel driver attached. bcdUSB: 512 bDeviceClass: 0 bDeviceSubClass: 0 bDeviceProtocol: 0 idVendor: 22b8 idProduct: 2e62 IN endpoint maxpacket: 512 bytes OUT endpoint maxpacket: 512 bytes Raw device info: Bus location: 2 Device number: 10 Device entry info: Vendor: (null) Vendor id: 0x22b8 Product: (null) Vendor id: 0x2e62 Device flags: 0x08008106 Configuration 0, interface 0, altsetting 0: Interface description contains the string "MTP" Device recognized as MTP, no further probing. Device info: Manufacturer: motorola Model: DROID RAZR HD Device version: 1.0 Serial number: Vendor extension ID: 0x0006 Vendor extension description: microsoft.com: 1.0; android.com: 1.0; mot-mobility.com/DSU: 1.2 Detected object size: 64 bits Extensions: microsoft.com: 1.0 android.com: 1.0 Supported operations: 1001: get device info 1002: Open session 1003: Close session 1004: Get storage IDs 1005: Get storage info 1006: Get number of objects 1007: Get object handles 1008: Get object info 1009: Get object 100a: Get thumbnail 100b: Delete object 100c: Send object info 100d: Send object 1014: Get device property description 1015: Get device property value 1016: Set device property value 1017: Reset device property value 101b: Get partial object 9801: Get object properties supported 9802: Get object property description 9803: Get object property value 9804: Set object property value 9805: Get object property list 9810: Get object references 9811: Set object references 95c1: Unknown (95c1) 95c2: Unknown (95c2) 95c3: Unknown (95c3) 95c4: Unknown (95c4) 95c5: Unknown (95c5) 9001: Unknown (9001) 9002: Unknown (9002) 9003: Unknown (9003) 9004: Unknown (9004) 9005: Unknown (9005) 9006: Unknown (9006) 9007: Unknown (9007) 9008: Unknown (9008) 9009: Unknown (9009) 900a: Unknown (900a) 900b: Unknown (900b) 900c: Unknown (900c) Events supported: 0x4002 0x4003 0x4004 0x4005 Device Properties Supported: 0xd401: Synchronization Partner 0xd402: Friendly Device Name 0x5003: Image Size Playable File (Object) Types and Object Properties Supported: 3000: Undefined Type dc01: Storage ID UINT32 data type ANY 32BIT VALUE form READ ONLY dc02: Object Format UINT16 data type ANY 16BIT VALUE form READ ONLY dc03: Protection Status UINT16 data type ANY 16BIT VALUE form READ ONLY dc04: Object Size UINT64 data type READ ONLY dc07: Object File Name STRING data type GET/SET dc09: Date Modified STRING data type DATETIME FORM READ ONLY dc0b: Parent Object UINT32 data type ANY 32BIT VALUE form READ ONLY dc41: Persistant Unique Object Identifier UINT128 data type READ ONLY dc44: Name STRING data type READ ONLY dc4e: Date Added STRING data type DATETIME FORM READ ONLY 3001: Association/Directory dc01: Storage ID UINT32 data type ANY 32BIT VALUE form READ ONLY dc02: Object Format UINT16 data type ANY 16BIT VALUE form READ ONLY dc03: Protection Status UINT16 data type ANY 16BIT VALUE form READ ONLY dc04: Object Size UINT64 data type READ ONLY dc07: Object File Name STRING data type GET/SET dc09: Date Modified STRING data type DATETIME FORM READ ONLY dc0b: Parent Object UINT32 data type ANY 32BIT VALUE form READ ONLY dc41: Persistant Unique Object Identifier UINT128 data type READ ONLY dc44: Name STRING data type READ ONLY dc4e: Date Added STRING data type DATETIME FORM READ ONLY 3004: Text dc01: Storage ID UINT32 data type ANY 32BIT VALUE form READ ONLY dc02: Object Format UINT16 data type ANY 16BIT VALUE form READ ONLY dc03: Protection Status UINT16 data type ANY 16BIT VALUE form READ ONLY dc04: Object Size UINT64 data type READ ONLY dc07: Object File Name STRING data type GET/SET dc09: Date Modified STRING data type DATETIME FORM READ ONLY dc0b: Parent Object UINT32 data type ANY 32BIT VALUE form READ ONLY dc41: Persistant Unique Object Identifier UINT128 data type READ ONLY dc44: Name STRING data type READ ONLY dc4e: Date Added STRING data type DATETIME FORM READ ONLY 3005:
[Bug 1529999] Re: reporting per mtp-detect: droid razr hd not recognized
See also Question #279679 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152 Title: reporting per mtp-detect: droid razr hd not recognized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmtp/+bug/152/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1467498] Re: evolution imap with comcast gets ping error
I see that this bug is listed as "affects 1 person." I'd like to point out the history of the problem goes clear back to 2005 and request that it be given more attention. The following results can be had by searching Questions for "evolution ping". So, there are at least 8 other users that have the problem, but others have also added their notations at various times. Answered6709Can I switch off evolution imap server ping? 2007-05-16 Stephan Elsner — Answered Answered1858Need to ping server before send or receiving using POP3 2006-09-22 rjhutt — Answered Solved 268423 evolution imap with comcast 2015-06-22 Phil Norisez — Solved Answered118 Timout error in evolution 2005-11-11 Philip Graetz — Answered Solved 83263 Evolution with 1and1.com2009-09-19 richnvel — Solved Solved 3965Send/Receive grayed out in evolution 2.9.92 2007-03-01 |Fred Krogh — Solved Solved 233857 connection timing out 2013-08-11 David Danforth — Solved Solved 68498 Error while Fetching Mail. (Evolution, Jaunty) 2009-04-24 Larry Vogler— Solved Solved 120667 Noob ?: Evolution "Login Failure" when attempting Send/Receive 2010-08-11 Popeye.Tom — Solved This problem makes evolution undesirable, since email fetching is suspended while it determines that the ping is not working. From the variety of different mailservers on which this has been reported, I conclude that this is a bug in Ubuntu's version of evolution. Please address this! ** Summary changed: - evolution imap with comcast gets ping error + evolution imap with various mail servers gets ping error -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467498 Title: evolution imap with various mail servers gets ping error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1467498/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1458967] Re: gpg not asking for passphrase to decrypt a file
This was bug was reported from a question in launchpad. It was recommended there to submit a bug report. I refuse to get into a tail chasing exercise over this issue, so please close it out. Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1458967 Title: gpg not asking for passphrase to decrypt a file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnupg/+bug/1458967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1467498] [NEW] evolution imap with comcast gets ping error
Public bug reported: Comcast/Xfinity is pushing us to go to IMAP instead of POP, so trying to do this. Setting up an evolution IMAP account to imap.comcast.net is all that is needed to reproduce this. Keep getting a message from evolution about imap.comcast.net disconnecting on a ping. Want to know if this indicates a real problem or is just an artifact of incompatibility between ubuntu evolution and comcast/xfinity, and CAN BE IGNORED. Error reads as follows: Error while Pinging IMAP server imap.comcast.net.Server unexpectedly disconnected. Connection timed out. Evolution info: 3.2.3 Ubuntu info: 12.04 (precise) kernel info: 3.13.0-55-generic I am reporting this as a bug because Ubuntu Software Center says: Canonical provides critical updates for Evolution Mail and Calendar until April 2017. ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467498 Title: evolution imap with comcast gets ping error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1467498/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1458967] [NEW] gpg not asking for passphrase to decrypt a file
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. Signed Ubuntu Code of Conduct without issuet, Decided to play with gpg to learn more about it, using the UCofC text for testing, Saved the UCofC into UCC2,txt. Encrypted the file into UCC2.gpg with command: gpg -r $USER -o UCC2.gpg --yes --symmetric -e UCC2.txt This worked fine, asking me for the passphrase twice, as expected. I gave it the one that I used to sign the UCofC for Launchpad. Then, to test the decryption: gpg -d UCC2.gpg UCC2_1.txt Got the following messages: 'You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for 'user: Phillip Norisez (This is my key for Launchpad) noris...@comcast.net '2560-bit ELG-E key, ID F91FDEB0, created 2015-04-27 (main key ID 05B43F32) ' 'gpg: encrypted with 1 passphrase 'gpg: encrypted with 2560-bit ELG-E key, ID F91FDEB0, created 2015-04-27 ' Phillip Norisez (This is my key for Launchpad) noris...@comcast.net' All of which seems to indicate the decrypt did not work. HOWEVER, diff UCC2_1.txt UCC2.txt DID NOT ERROR OUT AS EXPECTED. It seems that the text actually was written out to the file, even though errors appeared. Now, this leads me to ask the following: Why did the decrypt seem to work OK in spite of the errors? Why didn't gpg ask me for the passphrase? (I checked some old (ca 2009) posts that came up in a search for gpg not asking and found one that discussed checking the passphrase caching preferences for seahose, but I could not find them. I attributed this to the age of the posts; the preferences may have been deleted or moved. So, how do I change the caching preferences? Or can I not do that? Bottom line is that I expected gpg to ask me for the passphrase every time I try to decrypt the file. Is this a valid expectation? ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: + Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. + Signed Ubuntu Code of Conduct without issuet, Decided to play with gpg to learn more about it, using the UCofC text for testing, Saved the UCofC into UCC2,txt. Encrypted the file into UCC2.gpg with command: gpg -r $USER -o UCC2.gpg --yes --symmetric -e UCC2.txt This worked fine, asking me for the passphrase twice, as expected. I gave it the one that I used to sign the UCofC for Launchpad. Then, to test the decryption: gpg -d UCC2.gpg UCC2_1.txt Got the following messages: 'You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for 'user: Phillip Norisez (This is my key for Launchpad) noris...@comcast.net '2560-bit ELG-E key, ID F91FDEB0, created 2015-04-27 (main key ID 05B43F32) ' 'gpg: encrypted with 1 passphrase 'gpg: encrypted with 2560-bit ELG-E key, ID F91FDEB0, created 2015-04-27 - ' Phillip Norisez (This is my key for Launchpad) noris...@comcast.net' + ' Phillip Norisez (This is my key for Launchpad) noris...@comcast.net' All of which seems to indicate the decrypt did not work. HOWEVER, diff UCC2_1.txt UCC2.txt DID NOT ERROR OUT AS EXPECTED. It seems that the text actually was written out to the file, even though errors appeared. Now, this leads me to ask the following: Why did the decrypt seem to work OK in spite of the errors? Why didn't gpg ask me for the passphrase? (I checked some old (ca 2009) posts that came up in a search for gpg not asking and found one that discussed checking the passphrase caching preferences for seahose, but I could not find them. I attributed this to the age of the posts; the preferences may have been deleted or moved. So, how do I change the caching preferences? Or can I not do that? Bottom line is that I expected gpg to ask me for the passphrase every time I try to decrypt the file. Is this a valid expectation? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1458967 Title: gpg not asking for passphrase to decrypt a file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1458967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1434089] Re: Mongolia resumes DST in 2015
This change appeared as a Security Update, but does not appear so. Please include rationale for Security Update status. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1434089 Title: Mongolia resumes DST in 2015 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1434089/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 909723] Re: Issues with Volume Control on Lenovo R61i
11.10 install after applying Comment #4 Fix for bug 876020 on a Lenovo R61i (aka 89329xu). I cannot confirm the observation about the output volume in sound settings; I only have 100% marked about 2/3 of the way to the right. Here are some observations of my own: 1. Volume settings do not persist across boots. 2. In Gnome ALSA Mixer, I have two output controls, one for Headphon and one for Speaker. At boot, they both default to maximum. There is a PCM control which seems to affect Speaker. It also has three Mic controls, Mic, Mic1, and Mic2. Mic correlates to Input in sound settings. Mic1 and Mic2 appear to do nothing. Neither Input not Mic have any effect on the volume of an external microphone; it 's always at maximum. They appear to only control the internal mic, and only to the extent of 2 or three notches on the Input indicator. 3. The command line alsamixer shows the same as Gnome ALSA mixer, but in Curses graphics. Mic also has the additional label CAPTURE. These controls appear to function exactly like the Gnome ALSA Mixer. Indeed, corresponding controls track together betwee n the two programs. 4. Both Gnome ALSA Mixer and alsamixer identify my sound chip as Conexant ID 5045. Previous to the bug 876020 fix, they correctly identified it as a 20549. I am going to back the fix out to see if it reverts, and report on that here. All for now. Hope this information is helpful. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/909723 Title: Issues with Volume Control on Lenovo R61i To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/909723/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 909723] Re: Issues with Volume Control on Lenovo R61i
Hmm. After backing the change for bug 876020#4 out, the changes to the various controls persisted. In addition, control over the external mic volume seems to be enabled. Putting the change back in seems to make no difference. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/909723 Title: Issues with Volume Control on Lenovo R61i To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/909723/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 909723] Re: Issues with Volume Control on Lenovo R61i
The bug 876020#8 fix seems to only have had the effect of making all volume settings except headphon stick across boots. The headphon volume seems to be maxing out at boot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/909723 Title: Issues with Volume Control on Lenovo R61i To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/909723/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596727] Re: sysinfo crashes when I click on system: System.NullReferenceException
Running 10.10. I know I'm late to the party, but I just loaded hardinfo via sudo apt-get install hardinfo as suggested by the shell when I tried to run it. This works, and seems superior to sysinfo, anyway. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596727 Title: sysinfo crashes when I click on system: System.NullReferenceException To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/sysinfo/+bug/596727/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 789596] Re: Canonical doesn't provide updates is a scary message, especially for customers
Please also see the discussion in https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+question/177603 for additional justifications. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789596 Title: Canonical doesn't provide updates is a scary message, especially for customers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/789596/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
