[Bug 1198386] [NEW] package po4a not installed failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/fr/man1 , which is also in package menu 2.1.46ubuntu1

2013-07-05 Thread RegPerrin
Public bug reported: simply doing sudo su, apt-get update, apt-get upgrade always get the error message about man-db ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: po4a (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-26.38-generic 3.8.13.2 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-26-generic x86_64

[Bug 1197658] [NEW] package man-db 2.6.3-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2013-07-04 Thread RegPerrin
Public bug reported: ran synaptic package manager, reload, mark all upgrade, apply error message showed up ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: man-db 2.6.3-3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-26.38-generic 3.8.13.2 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-26-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules:

[Bug 1069625] Re: screen blanker activates after 10 mins of inactivity

2012-10-24 Thread RegPerrin
Solved by simply switching to the X.Org X server Nouveau display driver. This does not let me use my video card to it's fullest, and there may be issues when Steam finally ports to Linux, but that's something I can look at later. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1069625] [NEW] screen blanker activates after 10 mins of inactivity

2012-10-21 Thread RegPerrin
Public bug reported: I think this is with xorg package (this was decided by the os bug reporting tool). The screen blanker activates after 10 mins of inactivity regardless of the power or screen settings. I recently upgraded from 12.04, and I noticed this change in behaviour straight away. I

[Bug 1069625] Re: screen blanker activates after 10 mins of inactivity

2012-10-21 Thread RegPerrin
I hadn't changed any settings since I upgraded. The old settings were set never to turn off screen or to activate a screen saver or blanker. I happily manage that manually. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1068553] [NEW] package libgl1-mesa-dri 9.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libgl1-mesa-dri/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other insta

2012-10-19 Thread RegPerrin
Public bug reported: This was an automatic bug report. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: libgl1-mesa-dri 9.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-17.28-generic 3.5.5 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-17-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus.0:

[Bug 1058810] [NEW] Accidently opening multiple .deb installation files uses all system resources

2012-09-29 Thread RegPerrin
Public bug reported: In attempting to delete ~20 .deb files, I selected them, then I accidently pressed enter, instead of delete. This caused the system to use up almost all its resources in trying to fulfil my (accidental) commands. The cpu went to 100% usage, my 4GB of RAM was swiftly

[Bug 1058810] Re: Accidently opening multiple .deb installation files uses all system resources

2012-09-29 Thread RegPerrin
When I say there should be a confirmation box, I mean specifically, there should be a message box which warns that selecting more than one package to open will slow down the system, and asks confirmation from the user before executing their command. ** Package changed: ubuntu = nautilus (Ubuntu)

[Bug 532633] Re: [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to menu:minimize, maximize, close

2010-03-19 Thread RegPerrin
As far as I know, there have been no papers or research published on window button placement, or the advantages/disadvantages of any of the suggested positions and combinations. What we do know already is that it appears that MS arbitrarily chose the top-right position, and Apple chose the left

Re:[Bug 510395] Re: Upgrading from 9.04 32-bit and 64-bit 9.10 breaks my wireless network.

2010-01-21 Thread RegPerrin
solution. So, in answer to your request, yes, we have tried re-installing the drivers after upgrading the system. This does not work. Thanks in advance for your efforts, we love Ubuntu (especially my mum) Russell Tomes On Fri 22/01/10 09:24 , Tony Espy e...@canonical.com sent: @ RegPerrin You

Fwd: Re:[Bug 510395] Re: Upgrading from 9.04 32-bit and 64-bit 9.10 breaks my wireless network.

2010-01-21 Thread RegPerrin
mum) Russell Tomes On Fri 22/01/10 09:24 , Tony Espy e...@canonical.com sent: @ RegPerrin You said that you installed RaLink drivers yourself. I assume these didn't come as Debian packages. If that's the case, then what you need to do is try to re-install the drivers after you upgrade

[Bug 510395] [NEW] Upgrading from 9.04 32-bit and 64-bit to 9.10 breaks my wireless network.

2010-01-20 Thread RegPerrin
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager Upgrading from 9.04 32-bit and 64-bit to 9.10 breaks my wireless network. This sounds similar to some previous bugs, but I am not sure, and hopefully I have some extra information. I have several fully-functioning Linksys WUSB600N

[Bug 510395] Re: Upgrading from 9.04 32-bit and 64-bit to 9.10 breaks my wireless network.

2010-01-20 Thread RegPerrin
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38168815/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: IpAddr.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38168816/IpAddr.txt ** Attachment added: IwConfig.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38168817/IwConfig.txt ** Attachment added:

[Bug 510395] Re: Upgrading from 9.04 32-bit and 64-bit to 9.10 breaks my wireless network.

2010-01-20 Thread RegPerrin
I am sending this bug report from a different machine than the one experiencing the bug. -- Upgrading from 9.04 32-bit and 64-bit to 9.10 breaks my wireless network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510395 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is