[Bug 1851465] Re: apt-offline install fails
** Bug watch added: github.com/rickysarraf/apt-offline/issues #74 https://github.com/rickysarraf/apt-offline/issues/74 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851465 Title: apt-offline install fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-offline/+bug/1851465/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1851465] [NEW] apt-offline install fails
Looks like it is time to make a new apt-offline release. This bug has been reported and fixed in the upstream repository. https://github.com/rickysarraf/apt-offline/issues/74 On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 06:45 +, Ike Panhc wrote: > On bionic `apt-offline install` fails with python traceback. > > [Steps to reproduce] > > 1) sudo apt isntall -y apt-offline > 2) sudo apt-offline set vim.sig --install-packages vim > 3) sudo apt-offline get vim.sig --bundle vim.z > 4) sudo apt-offline install vim.zip > > [Expected result] > > vim installed > > [Actually result] > > $ sudo apt-offline install vim.zip > No changelog available > (Y) Yes. Proceed with installation > (N) No, Abort. > (C) Display changelog > (?) Display this help message. > What would you like to do next: (y, N, ?)y > Proceeding with installation > vim_2%3a8.0.1453-1ubuntu1.1_amd64.deb file synced. > vim-tiny_2%3a8.0.1453-1ubuntu1.1_amd64.deb file synced. > vim-runtime_2%3a8.0.1453-1ubuntu1.1_all.deb file synced. > vim-common_2%3a8.0.1453-1ubuntu1.1_all.deb file synced. > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/apt-offline", line 28, in > main() > File "/usr/lib/python3/dist- > packages/apt_offline_core/AptOfflineCoreLib.py", line 2211, in main > args.func(args) > File "/usr/lib/python3/dist- > packages/apt_offline_core/AptOfflineCoreLib.py", line 1917, in > installer > AptSecure = > APTVerifySigs(Simulate=InstallerInstance.Bool_TestWindows) > File "/usr/lib/python3/dist- > packages/apt_offline_core/AptOfflineCoreLib.py", line 594, in > __init__ > output = process.communicate(input=command)[0] > File "/usr/lib/python3.6/subprocess.py", line 843, in communicate > stdout, stderr = self._communicate(input, endtime, timeout) > File "/usr/lib/python3.6/subprocess.py", line 1499, in _communicate > input_view = memoryview(self._input) > TypeError: memoryview: a bytes-like object is required, not 'str' -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention." -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851465 Title: apt-offline install fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-offline/+bug/1851465/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1846454] Re: laptop mode tools gui cannot be opened through the start menu
On Thu, 2019-10-17 at 09:06 +, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote: > Also the Debian package beginning with "buster" is newer than the > Ubuntu > one: https://packages.debian.org/buster/laptop-mode-tools > > I have downloaded the package and installed it by hand on Ubuntu > 18.04 > LTS. The start menu link gets updated to show up the pkexec form and > the > GUI seems to have been ported from Qt4 to Qt5. So far so good > everything > seems to be working now! I am glad the Debian packages work for you. I maintain the upstream and the Debian packages. So if you ever run into any problem, please feel free to report it upstream. Thanks, Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention." -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846454 Title: laptop mode tools gui cannot be opened through the start menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laptop-mode-tools/+bug/1846454/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1846454] Re: laptop mode tools gui cannot be opened through the start menu
I don't remember if it went into 1.71 or not. But the GUI has integration with PolicyKit. You could try running either `pkexec lmt-config-gui` or `lmt-config-gui-pkexec`. This will only work on Xorg. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846454 Title: laptop mode tools gui cannot be opened through the start menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laptop-mode-tools/+bug/1846454/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1846454] Re: laptop mode tools gui cannot be opened through the start menu
And you may also consider reporting bugs to Upstream project here, https://github.com/rickysarraf/laptop-mode-tools, if you think they are generic and apply to upstream. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846454 Title: laptop mode tools gui cannot be opened through the start menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laptop-mode-tools/+bug/1846454/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 934772] Re: "place replies in same folder" option is not honored
On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 18:01 +, gf wrote: > Hello Ritesh, > Thank you for submitting this bug and reporting a problem with > Thunderbird. > > You made this bug report in 2012 and there have been several versions > of > Ubuntu and Thunderbird since then. Sorry. I don't use TB any more, so I don't really have any information to add to it. I guess you can close this bug report. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention." -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934772 Title: "place replies in same folder" option is not honored To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/934772/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1726930] Re: System fails to start (boot) on battery due to read-only root file-system
That's because what I instructed in #15 makes laptop-mode-tools ineffective to USB hotplug events. Not something that a user would want. As I see from the reports, this is what I think is happening. 1) Users have some combination of usb devices, getting hotplugged upon discovery. 2) Step 1 results in early invocation of LMT. 3) Which further results in file systems getting ro mounted. This step is still erratic and I have no clue what the calling parent is, to this ro mount. For users who've confirmed that #15 in the workaround works. Can you please apply the workaround, successfully boot, then change back the changes to its original, and then hotplug a USB device ? This will trigger the same chain of events, just that they'll be triggered upon full boot. Which should give us some insight into what may actually be behaving erratic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1726930 Title: System fails to start (boot) on battery due to read-only root file- system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laptop-mode-tools/+bug/1726930/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1726930] Re: System fails to start (boot) on battery due to read-only root file-system
Okay. Thanks for the reports. It could very well be the flakiness in usb devices that are causing this problem. Anyways, the best fix for this is to contain usb execution to the runtime module only. Note to self: per module activation was reported to not activating general power savings. Check those before any conclusions s3nt fr0m a $martph0ne, excuse typ0s On 11-Jan-2018 15:56, "Douw Steyn" <1726...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Works for me too with Ubuntu 17.10 on an Acer Extensa laptop (i5-6200U > SkyLake). Same symptoms but changing 'force' to 'auto' as above results > in successful booting from battery. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to laptop- > mode-tools in Ubuntu. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1726930 > > Title: > System fails to start (boot) on battery due to read-only root file- > system > > Status in laptop-mode-tools package in Ubuntu: > Confirmed > Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: > Confirmed > Status in systemd package in Debian: > Fix Released > > Bug description: > This report is to capture the extended diagnostic efforts done on IRC > #ubuntu for user maszlo, who has a Lenovo T450 with SSD that was > upgraded from 17.04 to 17.10 and since fails to complete start-up of > services when powered on battery. > > We'd previously applied the "acpi=os=! 'acpi_osi=Windows 2015'" > workaround in case this was an ACPI DSDT issue. > > This appears to be due to a read-only root file-system. What is not > clear is how the rootfs goes read-only. > > The file-system (sda6, ext4) is fsck-ed successfully in the initrd > according to the /run/initramfs/fsck.log. > > From the start-up logs (with "systemd.log_level=debug") we see the > ext4 driver report a remount operation not once but five times. > > $ grep 'EXT4-fs.*sda6' systemd-debug.log > Oct 23 18:10:44 T450s kernel: EXT4-fs (sda6): mounted filesystem with > ordered data mode. Opts: (null) > Oct 23 18:10:44 T450s kernel: EXT4-fs (sda6): re-mounted. Opts: > errors=remount-ro > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s kernel: EXT4-fs (sda6): re-mounted. Opts: > errors=remount-ro,data=ordered,commit=600 > Oct 23 18:10:47 T450s kernel: EXT4-fs (sda6): re-mounted. Opts: > errors=remount-ro,data=ordered,commit=600 > Oct 23 18:10:48 T450s kernel: EXT4-fs (sda6): re-mounted. Opts: > errors=remount-ro,data=ordered,commit=600 > Oct 23 18:10:48 T450s kernel: EXT4-fs (sda6): re-mounted. Opts: > errors=remount-ro,data=ordered,commit=600 > Oct 23 18:10:49 T450s kernel: EXT4-fs (sda6): re-mounted. Opts: > errors=remount-ro,data=ordered,commit=600 > > Those last five appear to be carrying options generated by laptop- > mode-tools. > > User has disabled laptop-mode.service and laptop-mode.timer, and lmt- > poll.service, but the issue remains. > > We see several reports of "read-only file-system": > > $ grep 'Read-only' systemd-debug.log > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s grub-common[1792]: grub-editenv: error: cannot > open `/boot/grub/grubenv': Read-only file system. > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: colord.service: Failed to run 'start' > task: Read-only file system > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s gpu-manager[1797]: Warning: writing to > /var/log/gpu-manager.log failed (Read-only file system) > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: systemd-resolved.service: Failed to > run 'start' task: Read-only file system > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: systemd-resolved.service: Failed to > run 'start' task: Read-only file system > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s gdm3[1932]: Failed to create LogDir /var/log/gdm3: > Read-only file system > ... > Oct 23 18:11:26 T450s cupsd[1461]: Unable to change ownership of > "/var/log/cups" - Read-only file system > Oct 23 18:11:26 T450s cupsd[1461]: Unable to open log file > "/var/log/cups/access_log" - Read-only file system > Oct 23 18:12:52 T450s login[9248]: pam_lastlog(login:session): unable to > open /var/log/lastlog: Read-only file system > > We also see several problems with systemd's connection to Dbus: > > $ grep 'Transport endpoint' systemd-debug.log > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: Failed to send job change signal for > 773: Transport endpoint is not connected > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: systemd-logind.service: Failed to send > unit change signal for systemd-logind.service: Transport endpoint is not > connected > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: Failed to send job remove signal for > 156: Transport endpoint is not connected > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: lmt-poll.service: Failed to send unit > change signal for lmt-poll.service: Transport endpoint is not connected > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: Failed to send job remove signal for > 182: Transport endpoint is not connected > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: Failed to send job remove signal for > 95: Transport endpoint is not connected > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: polkit.service: Failed to send unit > change signal for polkit.service: Transport
[Bug 1726930] Re: System fails to start (boot) on battery due to read-only root file-system
Thanks for confirming @reckenrode. I'd appreciate if more users confirmed the same. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1726930 Title: System fails to start (boot) on battery due to read-only root file- system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laptop-mode-tools/+bug/1726930/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1726930] Re: System fails to start (boot) on battery due to read-only root file-system
This would still be a flaky device or a kernel bug. Because the mentioned laptop-mode-tools version (1.71) brought in forced execution mode, so that it could apply proper power saving values. That's pretty much it. That does not result in read only rootfs because if it logically did, it'd be seen on every machine. BTW, does Ubuntu have the systemd/udevd mount propagation fix included ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1726930 Title: System fails to start (boot) on battery due to read-only root file- system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laptop-mode-tools/+bug/1726930/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1726930] Re: System fails to start (boot) on battery due to read-only root file-system
Folks... Does changing to following in /lib/udev/rules.d/99-laptop-mode.rules help ? ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="usb", RUN+="lmt-udev auto" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1726930 Title: System fails to start (boot) on battery due to read-only root file- system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laptop-mode-tools/+bug/1726930/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1726930] Re: System fails to start (boot) on battery due to read-only root file-system
This must be an Ubuntu specific problem. I haven't encountered the problem upstream. https://GitHub.com/rickysarraf/laptop-mode-tools s3nt fr0m a $martph0ne, excuse typ0s On 07-Dec-2017 02:36, "timor" <1726...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Uninstalling laptop-mode-tools helped me, but it's useful package and it > would be nice to get it back. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to laptop- > mode-tools in Ubuntu. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1726930 > > Title: > System fails to start (boot) on battery due to read-only root file- > system > > Status in laptop-mode-tools package in Ubuntu: > Confirmed > Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: > Confirmed > Status in systemd package in Debian: > Fix Released > > Bug description: > This report is to capture the extended diagnostic efforts done on IRC > #ubuntu for user maszlo, who has a Lenovo T450 with SSD that was > upgraded from 17.04 to 17.10 and since fails to complete start-up of > services when powered on battery. > > We'd previously applied the "acpi=os=! 'acpi_osi=Windows 2015'" > workaround in case this was an ACPI DSDT issue. > > This appears to be due to a read-only root file-system. What is not > clear is how the rootfs goes read-only. > > The file-system (sda6, ext4) is fsck-ed successfully in the initrd > according to the /run/initramfs/fsck.log. > > From the start-up logs (with "systemd.log_level=debug") we see the > ext4 driver report a remount operation not once but five times. > > $ grep 'EXT4-fs.*sda6' systemd-debug.log > Oct 23 18:10:44 T450s kernel: EXT4-fs (sda6): mounted filesystem with > ordered data mode. Opts: (null) > Oct 23 18:10:44 T450s kernel: EXT4-fs (sda6): re-mounted. Opts: > errors=remount-ro > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s kernel: EXT4-fs (sda6): re-mounted. Opts: > errors=remount-ro,data=ordered,commit=600 > Oct 23 18:10:47 T450s kernel: EXT4-fs (sda6): re-mounted. Opts: > errors=remount-ro,data=ordered,commit=600 > Oct 23 18:10:48 T450s kernel: EXT4-fs (sda6): re-mounted. Opts: > errors=remount-ro,data=ordered,commit=600 > Oct 23 18:10:48 T450s kernel: EXT4-fs (sda6): re-mounted. Opts: > errors=remount-ro,data=ordered,commit=600 > Oct 23 18:10:49 T450s kernel: EXT4-fs (sda6): re-mounted. Opts: > errors=remount-ro,data=ordered,commit=600 > > Those last five appear to be carrying options generated by laptop- > mode-tools. > > User has disabled laptop-mode.service and laptop-mode.timer, and lmt- > poll.service, but the issue remains. > > We see several reports of "read-only file-system": > > $ grep 'Read-only' systemd-debug.log > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s grub-common[1792]: grub-editenv: error: cannot > open `/boot/grub/grubenv': Read-only file system. > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: colord.service: Failed to run 'start' > task: Read-only file system > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s gpu-manager[1797]: Warning: writing to > /var/log/gpu-manager.log failed (Read-only file system) > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: systemd-resolved.service: Failed to > run 'start' task: Read-only file system > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: systemd-resolved.service: Failed to > run 'start' task: Read-only file system > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s gdm3[1932]: Failed to create LogDir /var/log/gdm3: > Read-only file system > ... > Oct 23 18:11:26 T450s cupsd[1461]: Unable to change ownership of > "/var/log/cups" - Read-only file system > Oct 23 18:11:26 T450s cupsd[1461]: Unable to open log file > "/var/log/cups/access_log" - Read-only file system > Oct 23 18:12:52 T450s login[9248]: pam_lastlog(login:session): unable to > open /var/log/lastlog: Read-only file system > > We also see several problems with systemd's connection to Dbus: > > $ grep 'Transport endpoint' systemd-debug.log > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: Failed to send job change signal for > 773: Transport endpoint is not connected > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: systemd-logind.service: Failed to send > unit change signal for systemd-logind.service: Transport endpoint is not > connected > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: Failed to send job remove signal for > 156: Transport endpoint is not connected > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: lmt-poll.service: Failed to send unit > change signal for lmt-poll.service: Transport endpoint is not connected > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: Failed to send job remove signal for > 182: Transport endpoint is not connected > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: Failed to send job remove signal for > 95: Transport endpoint is not connected > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: polkit.service: Failed to send unit > change signal for polkit.service: Transport endpoint is not connected > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: cups-browsed.service: Failed to send > unit change signal for cups-browsed.service: Transport endpoint is not > connected > Oct 23 18:10:46 T450s systemd[1]: Failed to send job change signal for > 773: Transport
Re: [Bug 1603659] Re: Power Management: USB mouse and keyboard laggy and loosing events
On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 07:43 +, Hans-Georg Beyer wrote: > So this is definitely a bug in or wrong parametrization of the > laptop-mode tools or the programs invoked by laptop-mode. Please see: https://github.com/rickysarraf/laptop-mode-tools/wiki/FAQ Especially: My USB Mouse / Keyboard stops working after seconds of inactivity Many devices advertise power savings but misbehave when power savings is triggered. Laptop Mode Tools, by default, enabled power savings for all devices. In newer version of Laptop Mode Tools (1.69 and above), we have revised the default list of blacklisted devices. USB Mice, USB Keyboards and USB Storage are obvious device types. If you have devices, that mis-behave when running on battery, you can blacklist them. For details on blacklisting the device, please refer to the configuration details in /etc/laptop-mode/conf.d/runtime-pm.conf -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention." -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1603659 Title: Power Management: USB mouse and keyboard laggy and loosing events To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laptop-mode-tools/+bug/1603659/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1343159] Re: apt-offline get doesn't work on FreeBSD 10/Python 2.7.6
I am the upstream developer for apt-offline. I never received this bug report, even though I'm shown as subscribed to all apt-offline bugs in Ubuntu. Sigh! = Subscribers To all bugs in apt-offline in Ubuntu: Ritesh Raj Sarraf = Anyways. firstly, does the issue still apply ? Or did the python folks fix it in between ? This looks like a Python/FreeBSD limitation. But if the issue is not fixed, and annoying, please let me know. We can easily workaround it in apt-offline. PS: apt-offline upstream is at: https://github.com/rickysarraf/apt- offline -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1343159 Title: apt-offline get doesn't work on FreeBSD 10/Python 2.7.6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-offline/+bug/1343159/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1579972] Re: Dependancy Not Found for Update
>From the description so far, it sounds like both the repositories are providing packages with the same name. So, in case of this bug report, this must be a Ubuntu issue, and not an apt-offline issue. Have you checked if adding external repositories is supported by Ubuntu? OTOH, if you find an issue in apt-offline specifically, please report it upstream at: https://github.com/rickysarraf/apt-offline I try my best to keep an eye here, but as you see, this got missed for 5 months. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579972 Title: Dependancy Not Found for Update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-offline/+bug/1579972/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1438758] Re: User to root privilege escalation (ab)using the crash forwarding feature of apport
This was fixed in the upload of apport 2.17.3-1 to Debian Experimental ** Changed in: apport (Debian) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1438758 Title: User to root privilege escalation (ab)using the crash forwarding feature of apport To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/1438758/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1416847] Re: kerneloops on suspend from resume
On Thursday 16 April 2015 04:17 PM, svenmeier wrote: @rrs: It would be interesting to know any difference between your device and mine: - mine has a Realtek (rtl8723be) wifi card - I have installed an SSD, the built-in HDD is kept on standby most of the time Yes. I noticed that when I looked at your configuration. I have the same card. And I think you are on the same bios too. The only exception is the SSD. I'm still to find a reasonably priced SSD in my locality. PS: Like I've reported before, I have a pretty good suspend/resume rate. I did dive deeper into what has been happening during suspend. The SATA exceptions (I'm sure you must have seen that on your box) happen very frequently during suspend image write (I use s2both). Also the intel driver throws in many errors. But after the fix (that was added in 3.19.3), the intel error is not fatal anymore. The errors I'm talking are (there may be more I've missed to scan and copy): [48920.101300] PM: resume of devices complete after 2413.483 msecs [48920.175753] i915 :00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x flags 0x2] has bogus alignment [48920.175888] i915 :00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x flags 0x2] has bogus alignment [48920.176269] i915 :00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x flags 0x2] has bogus alignment [48920.176333] i915 :00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x flags 0x2] has bogus alignment [48920.176481] acpi device:30: Cannot transition to power state D3cold for parent in (unknown) [48920.176896] pci_bus :01: Allocating resources [48920.176913] i915 :00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x flags 0x2] has bogus alignment [48920.177027] i915 :00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x flags 0x2] has bogus alignment [48920.177247] i915 :00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x flags 0x2] has bogus alignment [48920.215658] ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320) [48920.321236] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 [48920.650359] Restarting kernel threads ... done. [48920.650718] PM: Basic memory bitmaps freed [48920.650722] Restarting tasks ... done. And I think the SATA errors and the relink to 3 Gbps is okay. The reason being, afaik, it is a rev 3 device connected to the rev 2 port. I still need to open up my laptop and look into more specifics. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1416847 Title: kerneloops on suspend from resume To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1416847/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1416847] Re: kerneloops on suspend from resume
On Wednesday 22 April 2015 11:34 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: On Thursday 16 April 2015 04:17 PM, svenmeier wrote: @rrs: It would be interesting to know any difference between your device and mine: - mine has a Realtek (rtl8723be) wifi card - I have installed an SSD, the built-in HDD is kept on standby most of the time Yes. I noticed that when I looked at your configuration. I have the same card. And I think you are on the same bios too. The only exception is the SSD. I'm still to find a reasonably priced SSD in my locality. PS: Like I've reported before, I have a pretty good suspend/resume rate. I did dive deeper into what has been happening during suspend. The SATA exceptions (I'm sure you must have seen that on your box) happen very frequently during suspend image write (I use s2both). Also the intel driver throws in many errors. But after the fix (that was added in 3.19.3), the intel error is not fatal anymore. If you want, I can share my kernel image and headers package for you to try. That may help you. Just ping me off this list. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1416847 Title: kerneloops on suspend from resume To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1416847/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1416847] Re: kerneloops on suspend from resume
On Friday 03 April 2015 02:16 AM, svenmeier wrote: Nope, blacklisting mei and mei-me didn't help either. Hard luck then. It works perfect for me here. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1416847 Title: kerneloops on suspend from resume To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1416847/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1416847] Re: kerneloops on suspend from resume
On Tuesday 31 March 2015 03:55 PM, svenmeier wrote: Bad news: neither 3.19.3 nor 4.0-rc5 fixes the problem :(. That is odd. The same works for me on 3.19.3 (stock kernel). Can you try blacklisting the following ? That's the only other change that I hadn't mentioned you. rrs@learner:~$ cat /etc/modprobe.d/intel-mei-blacklist.conf blacklist mei blacklist mei-me 18:21 ♒♒♒ ☺ -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1416847 Title: kerneloops on suspend from resume To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1416847/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1416847] Re: kerneloops on suspend from resume
@svenmeier: Just FYI. Linux Git Upstream Commit ID: ab3be73fa7b43f4c3648ce29b5fd649ea54d3adb should be the fix for you too. And it is part of 3.19.3. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1416847 Title: kerneloops on suspend from resume To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1416847/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1416847] Re: kerneloops on suspend from resume
I have the same hardware and I share the same problem. In fact, the kernel in use, is shared by both Ubuntu and Debian. I am on the Debian Jessie kernel. Like the OP, I tried with 3.19.2, but the problem exists. He was lucky to have survived 2 weeks. I can't survive more than 48 hrs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1416847 Title: kerneloops on suspend from resume To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1416847/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1416847] Re: kerneloops on suspend from resume
While the Yoga 2 13 is in no way shipped by Lenovo, their acpi tables do
have an exception for _OSI(Linux). Which makes me wonder if that's just
to blacklist things.
Someone more knowledgable on this list may want to shed some light.
Method (_INI, 0, NotSerialized) // _INI: Initialize
{
Store (0x07D0, OSYS) /* \OSYS */
If (CondRefOf (\_OSI, Local0))
{
If (_OSI (Windows 2001))
{
Store (0x07D1, OSYS) /* \OSYS */
}
If (_OSI (Windows 2001 SP1))
{
Store (0x07D1, OSYS) /* \OSYS */
}
If (_OSI (Windows 2001 SP2))
{
Store (0x07D2, OSYS) /* \OSYS */
}
If (_OSI (Windows 2001.1))
{
Store (0x07D3, OSYS) /* \OSYS */
}
If (_OSI (Windows 2006))
{
Store (0x07D6, OSYS) /* \OSYS */
}
If (_OSI (Windows 2009))
{
Store (0x07D9, OSYS) /* \OSYS */
}
If (_OSI (Windows 2012))
{
Store (0x07DC, OSYS) /* \OSYS */
}
If (_OSI (Windows 2013))
{
Store (0x07DD, OSYS) /* \OSYS */
}
If (_OSI (Linux))
{
Store (0x03E8, OSYS) /* \OSYS */
}
}
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1416847
Title:
kerneloops on suspend from resume
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1416847/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1416847] Re: kerneloops on suspend from resume
Errr: While the Yoga 2 13 is in no way supported by Lenovo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1416847 Title: kerneloops on suspend from resume To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1416847/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 752542] Re: ACPI DSDT info
http://www8.hp.com/us/en/ads/envy-touchsmart-15/specs.html ** Attachment added: Hewlett-Packard-HP_ENVY_TS_15_Notebook_PC.tar.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/lpbugreporter/+bug/752542/+attachment/4297027/+files/Hewlett-Packard-HP_ENVY_TS_15_Notebook_PC.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752542 Title: ACPI DSDT info To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bumblebee/+bug/752542/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1399037] [NEW] apt-get can not simulate
On 12/04/2014 06:39 AM, Svivi wrote: Public bug reported: Hi, I just noticed that apt can not simulate in Ubuntu 14.04.1. sudo apt-get -s dselect-upgrade E: A(z) „s” parancssori kapcsoló [a következőből: -s] ismeretlen. sudo apt-get --dry-run dselect-upgrade E: --dry-run parancssori kapcsoló értelmezhetetlen sudo apt-get --recon dselect-upgrade E: --recon parancssori kapcsoló értelmezhetetlen sudo apt-get --just-print dselect-upgrade E: --just-print parancssori kapcsoló értelmezhetetlen sudo apt-get --just-print dselect-upgrade E: --just-print parancssori kapcsoló értelmezhetetlen sudo apt-get --just-print dselect-upgrade E: --just-print parancssori kapcsoló értelmezhetetlen The issue occures with at least the following versions of apt: 1.0.1ubuntu2.4.1, 1.0.1ubuntu2.5 It works fine on Ubuntu 12.04 with: 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.22 What is the version of apt-offline you are using ? Also, I cannot make out the non-english error message. There were issues, that were fixed upstream in version 1.5 of apt-offline. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1399037 Title: apt-get can not simulate To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1399037/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1361935] Re: laptop_mode gets executed twice on (un)plug events
On Sunday 31 August 2014 05:41 AM, Daniel Hahler wrote: This must be something else, given the fact that the timestamps are same. Isn't this just because two processes get started simultaneously? And one of these processes then finds that the state needs not to get changed (after waiting for the lock). Actually. Yes. You are right. I went back and checked the code. That section of the code (lmt_load_config() ) is before we acquire the lock. So based on how many events trigger, you will see equal number of messages. But only one among them will be allowed to proceed further. So I see this behavior fine. Do you have a different idea on how you'd like to see it behave ? -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1361935 Title: laptop_mode gets executed twice on (un)plug events To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laptop-mode-tools/+bug/1361935/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1361935] [NEW] laptop_mode gets executed twice on (un)plug events
On Wednesday 27 August 2014 08:07 AM, Daniel Hahler wrote: I have just install laptop-mode-tools, and noticed that `/usr/sbin/laptop_mode` gets executed twice when (un)plugging the laptop: Aug 27 04:29:05 host laptop-mode: Determining power state from /sys/class/power_supply/AC/online. Aug 27 04:29:05 host laptop-mode: Determining power state from /sys/class/power_supply/AC/online. Aug 27 04:29:05 host laptop-mode: Not trying other options, already found a power supply. Aug 27 04:29:05 host laptop-mode: Not trying other options, already found a power supply. Aug 27 04:29:05 host laptop-mode: Battery level polling is disabled. Aug 27 04:29:05 host laptop-mode: Battery level polling is disabled. Aug 27 04:29:05 host laptop-mode: Prelim lock acquisition on descriptor 8 with pid 21553 Aug 27 04:29:05 host laptop-mode: Couldn't acquire prelim lock on descriptor 8 with pid 21554 Aug 27 04:29:05 host laptop-mode: Prelim lock acquisition on descriptor 9 with pid 21553 Aug 27 04:29:05 host laptop-mode: Couldn't acquire prelim lock on descriptor 9 with pid 21554 That's not really a problem, since the second instance will then recognize that nothing needs to get changed in the end: Aug 27 04:29:06 host laptop-mode: Laptop mode Aug 27 04:29:06 host laptop-mode: Checking if desired state is different from current state. Aug 27 04:29:06 host laptop-mode: enabled, not active [unchanged] This must be something else, given the fact that the timestamps are same. Perhaps there are 2 logging services logging at the same time. For LMT, Only 1 invocation of laptop-mode-tools is allowed. All further invocations will find the lock acquired and just be ignored until the previous acquisition of the lock is released. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1361935 Title: laptop_mode gets executed twice on (un)plug events To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laptop-mode-tools/+bug/1361935/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1309141] Re: Apt is missing tab complete on things like list search etc
My bad. It works. It expected me logged in into alioth. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1309141 Title: Apt is missing tab complete on things like list search etc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apt/+bug/1309141/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1309141] Re: Apt is missing tab complete on things like list search etc
The alioth bug links seems to be invalid. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1309141 Title: Apt is missing tab complete on things like list search etc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apt/+bug/1309141/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1323976] [NEW] apt-offline not working: Command line option --simulate is not understood
On 05/29/2014 05:32 PM, Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote: You have been subscribed to a public bug: I have Ubuntu 14.04 64bit installed and fully updated. I installed package apt-offline. Following command does not work: $ sudo apt-get set ao.sig Generating database of files that are needed for an update. E: Command line option --simulate is not understood ERROR: FATAL: Something is wrong with the apt system. This is already fixed in my repo and will be part of the next Debian release. Which means, eventually it will land in Ubuntu after that. Thanks for reporting this bug though. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1323976 Title: apt-offline not working: Command line option --simulate is not understood To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-offline/+bug/1323976/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1307470] Re: Configuration is ignored laptop-mode-tools specific tweaks are only aplied after a restart of laptop-mode
On 04/17/2014 04:47 AM, Daniel Holz wrote: Isn't pm-utils responsible for Suspending and Hibernation, too? Removing it doesn't sound like a good idea. Sadly, staying with it only consumes slightly more power on my tablet than using laptop-mode-tools. Yes. The kernel is. pm-utils just triggered it. And it also provides hooks into a FD.o spec which then is consumed by all Desktop Managers. That's how the dependencies are built. For that reason, in LMT, we started shipping helper scripts for suspend / hibernate, but we did not make them hook into any DMs. The next release of LMT will have the suspend / hibernate functionality in the LMT GUI Configuration Tool also. With all this talked now, I think you should close this bug report. There's nobody assigned to it anyways. :-) -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307470 Title: Configuration is ignored laptop-mode-tools specific tweaks are only aplied after a restart of laptop-mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laptop-mode-tools/+bug/1307470/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1307470] Re: Configuration is ignored laptop-mode-tools specific tweaks are only aplied after a restart of laptop-mode
On 04/16/2014 02:31 PM, Daniel Holz wrote: Oh, yes I forgot to mention that I had installed the Debian package because of the problems. According to the developer page it usually works better than the on in the Ubuntu repository. Because it didn't help I'm using the one from the repository again which still gives me same problems. mt-config-gui doesn't give me an apply-button at all. The one in the Ubuntu repository may be broken then. Check attached screenshot. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307470 Title: Configuration is ignored laptop-mode-tools specific tweaks are only aplied after a restart of laptop-mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laptop-mode-tools/+bug/1307470/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1307470] Re: Configuration is ignored laptop-mode-tools specific tweaks are only aplied after a restart of laptop-mode
** Attachment added: ajdgjbjb.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307470/+attachment/4085580/+files/ajdgjbjb.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307470 Title: Configuration is ignored laptop-mode-tools specific tweaks are only aplied after a restart of laptop-mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laptop-mode-tools/+bug/1307470/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1307470] Re: Configuration is ignored laptop-mode-tools specific tweaks are only aplied after a restart of laptop-mode
Ubuntu perfers (and support) pm-utils. So if you are on Ubuntu, you should stick to pm-utils only. There are ways to purge pm-utils (if you don't like it) and use something else, like LMT, as the sole power saving service. But that's something not an average user should be recommended to do. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307470 Title: Configuration is ignored laptop-mode-tools specific tweaks are only aplied after a restart of laptop-mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laptop-mode-tools/+bug/1307470/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1307470] [NEW] Configuration is ignored laptop-mode-tools specific tweaks are only aplied after a restart of laptop-mode
On 04/14/2014 05:33 PM, Daniel Holz wrote: Changes in the configuration of laptop-mode-tools through lmt-config-gui or manually editing the config-files in /etc/laptop-mode files has no effect. Also the laptop-mode-tools specific energy saving tweaks are only applied if laptop-mode is restarted manually after login. Not speaking on behalf of the package in Ubuntu, but as an upstream, I would be interested to know the cause. lmt-config-gui will trigger a restart, when you hit the apply button. If the changes are not reflecting, please provide the system logs. Something else must be obstructing. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307470 Title: Configuration is ignored laptop-mode-tools specific tweaks are only aplied after a restart of laptop-mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laptop-mode-tools/+bug/1307470/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1135453] Re: open-iscsi +mpio with multipathd init script order errors
On Friday 01 March 2013 05:49 PM, Mike Burgener wrote:
defaults {
udev_dir/dev
polling_interval30
selectorround-robin 0
path_grouping_policymultibus
getuid_callout /lib/udev/scsi_id --whitelisted --device=/dev/%n
prio_callout/bin/true
path_checkerreadsector0
prioconst
rr_min_io 100
rr_weight uniform
failbackimmediate
no_path_retry 12
user_friendly_name yes
hardware_handler0
}
The behavior you reported is pretty interesting. You reported that you
suffered the hang state because the umount occurred after the multipathd
and iscsid processes were killed by the init scripts (which I also
assumed given the new init systems, upstart and systemd).
But looking at your config, you should not typically see the hang
scenario. I was suspecting that you might be using the multipath
queue_if_no_path feature, but that is not the case here. The iscsi
replacement timeouts are also the defaults, i.e. 120 seconds, which
would mean that after 120 seconds of retry, iscsi will error out and the
errors will propagate to the upper layers.
Ideally, with the configuration settings that you have, you should see
the errors show up after 120 seconds, and NOT hang. I have no more ideas
on what might be going wrong in your setup. Perhaps the Ubuntu multipath
maintainer might have some insight to this.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
Necessity is the mother of invention.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135453
Title:
open-iscsi +mpio with multipathd init script order errors
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1135453/+subscriptions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 1135453] Re: open-iscsi +mpio with multipathd init script order errors
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Mike Burgener mburge...@tuxinator.orgwrote: you seem to feel that it is normal that multipathd is stopped then the iscsi device logged out (so the blockdevice disappears) and then umount? No. The correct steps are to first umount the device, then flush the multipath map, and then depending on the transport (iSCSI, FC or FCoE) act further. Never should we do it any other way. It is just asking for too much trouble. But technically iscsid or multipatd daemon processes are not the core performers. If you look at my Debian packages regular system v init scripts, you'll see that killing the daemon and terminating the iscsi sessions are 2 different tasks [1]. That's what I meant in my previous mails. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-iscsi/open-iscsi.git;a=blob;f=debian/open-iscsi.init;h=221fc9147f684bdb0bbcbda36799d5867bc617f2;hb=HEAD this would end in a possible dataloss scenario isn't it? Hard to predict. But yes, there could be a rare chance. btw. also bootup does not work so there must be some logical error i think. Would it be possible for you to test this out on a sysv init? Or maybe even try this on Debian? (But do note that the Ubuntu packages are not directly identical to Debian ones). of course the 120 hung timeout message from kernel arrives but i think it does never continue as it can no more sync disks? could that make sense? That might be the hung_task kernel messages. Yes. regards Mike -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135453 Title: open-iscsi +mpio with multipathd init script order errors Status in “multipath-tools” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: when using open-iscsi and multipathd for a mpio setup there are several init script logical issues: when shutting down, the system does first stop multipathd and then try to umount the filesystem and then stop open-iscsi to the system hangs forever on shutdown. also when booting up it does mount the partition before multipathd and open-iscsi are ready and you get the ubuntu screen that the partition could not get mounted, do you want to skip. after bootup process you can however mount the partition without any issue. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1135453/+subscriptions -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135453 Title: open-iscsi +mpio with multipathd init script order errors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1135453/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 1135453] Re: open-iscsi +mpio with multipathd init script order errors
On Friday 01 March 2013 05:49 PM, Mike Burgener wrote:
defaults {
udev_dir/dev
polling_interval30
selectorround-robin 0
path_grouping_policymultibus
getuid_callout /lib/udev/scsi_id --whitelisted --device=/dev/%n
prio_callout/bin/true
path_checkerreadsector0
prioconst
rr_min_io 100
rr_weight uniform
failbackimmediate
no_path_retry 12
user_friendly_name yes
hardware_handler0
}
The behavior you reported is pretty interesting. You reported that you
suffered the hang state because the umount occurred after the multipathd
and iscsid processes were killed by the init scripts (which I also
assumed given the new init systems, upstart and systemd).
But looking at your config, you should not typically see the hang
scenario. I was suspecting that you might be using the multipath
queue_if_no_path feature, but that is not the case here. The iscsi
replacement timeouts are also the defaults, i.e. 120 seconds, which
would mean that after 120 seconds of retry, iscsi will error out and the
errors will propagate to the upper layers.
Ideally, with the configuration settings that you have, you should see
the errors show up after 120 seconds, and NOT hang. I have no more ideas
on what might be going wrong in your setup. Perhaps the Ubuntu multipath
maintainer might have some insight to this.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
Necessity is the mother of invention.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135453
Title:
open-iscsi +mpio with multipathd init script order errors
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1135453/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1135453] Re: open-iscsi +mpio with multipathd init script order errors
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Mike Burgener mburge...@tuxinator.orgwrote: you seem to feel that it is normal that multipathd is stopped then the iscsi device logged out (so the blockdevice disappears) and then umount? No. The correct steps are to first umount the device, then flush the multipath map, and then depending on the transport (iSCSI, FC or FCoE) act further. Never should we do it any other way. It is just asking for too much trouble. But technically iscsid or multipatd daemon processes are not the core performers. If you look at my Debian packages regular system v init scripts, you'll see that killing the daemon and terminating the iscsi sessions are 2 different tasks [1]. That's what I meant in my previous mails. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-iscsi/open-iscsi.git;a=blob;f=debian/open-iscsi.init;h=221fc9147f684bdb0bbcbda36799d5867bc617f2;hb=HEAD this would end in a possible dataloss scenario isn't it? Hard to predict. But yes, there could be a rare chance. btw. also bootup does not work so there must be some logical error i think. Would it be possible for you to test this out on a sysv init? Or maybe even try this on Debian? (But do note that the Ubuntu packages are not directly identical to Debian ones). of course the 120 hung timeout message from kernel arrives but i think it does never continue as it can no more sync disks? could that make sense? That might be the hung_task kernel messages. Yes. regards Mike -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135453 Title: open-iscsi +mpio with multipathd init script order errors Status in “multipath-tools” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: when using open-iscsi and multipathd for a mpio setup there are several init script logical issues: when shutting down, the system does first stop multipathd and then try to umount the filesystem and then stop open-iscsi to the system hangs forever on shutdown. also when booting up it does mount the partition before multipathd and open-iscsi are ready and you get the ubuntu screen that the partition could not get mounted, do you want to skip. after bootup process you can however mount the partition without any issue. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1135453/+subscriptions -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135453 Title: open-iscsi +mpio with multipathd init script order errors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1135453/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1135453] [NEW] open-iscsi +mpio with multipathd init script order errors
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Launchpad Bug Tracker 1135...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: You have been subscribed to a public bug: when using open-iscsi and multipathd for a mpio setup there are several init script logical issues: when shutting down, the system does first stop multipathd and then try to umount the filesystem and then stop open-iscsi to the system hangs forever on shutdown. Killing the daemon shouldn't have direct impact on umount of the map, unless all the paths for that map go offline. If every operation goes in parallel (with my understanding of the new gen init services like upstart and systemd), and iscsi sessions get dropped before the umount, yes, you definitely will run into the hang situation. Again, the hang situation depends on how your multipath policy is configured. also when booting up it does mount the partition before multipathd and open-iscsi are ready and you get the ubuntu screen that the partition could not get mounted, do you want to skip. after bootup process you can however mount the partition without any issue. It is hard to make out what might be the cause from just the english explanation. Perhaps the multipath maintainer here can translate this to *Steps To Reproduce* and then investigate it further. ** Affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: bot-comment -- open-iscsi +mpio with multipathd init script order errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135453 You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135453 Title: open-iscsi +mpio with multipathd init script order errors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1135453/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 1135453] [NEW] open-iscsi +mpio with multipathd init script order errors
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Launchpad Bug Tracker 1135...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: You have been subscribed to a public bug: when using open-iscsi and multipathd for a mpio setup there are several init script logical issues: when shutting down, the system does first stop multipathd and then try to umount the filesystem and then stop open-iscsi to the system hangs forever on shutdown. Killing the daemon shouldn't have direct impact on umount of the map, unless all the paths for that map go offline. If every operation goes in parallel (with my understanding of the new gen init services like upstart and systemd), and iscsi sessions get dropped before the umount, yes, you definitely will run into the hang situation. Again, the hang situation depends on how your multipath policy is configured. also when booting up it does mount the partition before multipathd and open-iscsi are ready and you get the ubuntu screen that the partition could not get mounted, do you want to skip. after bootup process you can however mount the partition without any issue. It is hard to make out what might be the cause from just the english explanation. Perhaps the multipath maintainer here can translate this to *Steps To Reproduce* and then investigate it further. ** Affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: bot-comment -- open-iscsi +mpio with multipathd init script order errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135453 You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135453 Title: open-iscsi +mpio with multipathd init script order errors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1135453/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1123192] [NEW] open-iscsi removes modules on stop but should not
What other users are you talking about?
On Feb 12, 2013 9:30 PM, Alex Bligh ubu...@alex.org.uk wrote:
Public bug reported:
open-iscsi's stop script has within it the following lines:
stop() {
stoptargets
log_daemon_msg Stopping iSCSI initiator service
start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --signal KILL --exec $DAEMON
rm -f $PIDFILE /lib/init/rw/sendsigs.omit.d/`basename $PIDFILE`
modprobe -r ib_iser 2/dev/null
modprobe -r iscsi_tcp 2/dev/null
log_end_msg 0
}
The modprobe -r lines attempt to remove the relevant iscsi modules. I
believe this to be a bug, because there may be other users of those modules
besides open-iscsi. On an upgrade (for instance) and attempt is made to
remove those modules (albeit ignoring errors), and then modprobe them back
in again. However, those modules are not distributed in the open-iscsi
package - they are kernel modules - and open-iscsi has no business removing
them as there may be other users using them in the mean time.
I can see no reason why they are being removed at all.
A simple fix is to remove the two 'modprobe -r' lines from debian/open-
iscsi.init.
** Affects: open-iscsi (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to open-
iscsi in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1123192
Title:
open-iscsi removes modules on stop but should not
Status in “open-iscsi” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
open-iscsi's stop script has within it the following lines:
stop() {
stoptargets
log_daemon_msg Stopping iSCSI initiator service
start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --signal KILL --exec $DAEMON
rm -f $PIDFILE /lib/init/rw/sendsigs.omit.d/`basename $PIDFILE`
modprobe -r ib_iser 2/dev/null
modprobe -r iscsi_tcp 2/dev/null
log_end_msg 0
}
The modprobe -r lines attempt to remove the relevant iscsi modules. I
believe this to be a bug, because there may be other users of those modules
besides open-iscsi. On an upgrade (for instance) and attempt is made to
remove those modules (albeit ignoring errors), and then modprobe them back
in again. However, those modules are not distributed in the open-iscsi
package - they are kernel modules - and open-iscsi has no business removing
them as there may be other users using them in the mean time.
I can see no reason why they are being removed at all.
A simple fix is to remove the two 'modprobe -r' lines from debian
/open-iscsi.init.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-iscsi/+bug/1123192/+subscriptions
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1123192
Title:
open-iscsi removes modules on stop but should not
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-iscsi/+bug/1123192/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1025240] Re: iscsid is started before networking
On Monday 16 July 2012 06:02 PM, RoyK wrote: Please just close/ignore this one, or perhaps just change it to a documentation bug. Seems if node startup is set to manual in /etc/iscsi/iscsid.conf, this setting is copied to the target, so that even if the former is changed later, it isn't reflected in the already discovered target. Changing this manually, fixes the problem Yes. And not just the startup setting, but also all other settings. These settings are read during discovery and accordingly the database is created. Updation of the records for the discovered targets will require the usage of 'iscsiadm -m node ' command. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025240 Title: iscsid is started before networking To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-iscsi/+bug/1025240/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1001132] [NEW] Webcam turns on/off randomly
On Friday 18 May 2012 03:10 PM, Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote: You have been subscribed to a public bug: In my new install of ubuntu 12.04, The webcam light indicator starts flashing randomly, as if the camera is turned on by itself. This happened before only when i logged in, and also when i opened gmail on firefox / chrome, but now it happens at random. My previous workaround was 'turning off' the camera using cheese, but now even this is not working. I have a Thinkpad SL400 with a fresh install of ubuntu 12.04. This somehow seems to be related to the power manager. If i plug the laptop to the charger, the camera light turns on. That's because laptop-mode-tools, by default, enables power saving measures for all devices that broadcast it. In your case, the webcam driver broadcasts that it can do power saving, where as in reality, it is not. You might want to also report it as a kernel driver bug. As for the solution, removing laptop-mode-tools is one option, which you have already done. The other option is to disable powersavings for this device by finding its usb ID (using lsusb command) and adding it to laptop-mode-tools' blacklist section in /etc/laptop-mode/conf.d/usb-autosuspend.conf config file. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001132 Title: Webcam turns on/off randomly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laptop-mode-tools/+bug/1001132/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 953892] Re: Fails to run as unprivileged user
On Saturday 28 April 2012 10:18 PM, Hernando Torque wrote: Just for the sake of completeness: this is still happening in the final release of Ubuntu 12.04. This works fine on Debian. If you look at the divergence of Ubuntu from Debian: * Kernel - You already verified it and that it has all infrastructure in place. * MAC - You say AppArmor is disabled. What you could check is if the stapusr/stapdev groups were managed proper in Ubuntu. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953892 Title: Fails to run as unprivileged user To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemtap/+bug/953892/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 937723] Re: apparmor is logging too many messages
On Sunday 04 March 2012 05:36 PM, Leon wrote:
I added @{PROC}/[0-9]*/task/[0-9]*/stat r, to make it work.
So it becomes:
owner @{PROC}/[0-9]*/cmdline r,
owner @{PROC}/[0-9]*/io r,
owner @{PROC}/[0-9]*/stat r,
owner @{PROC}/[0-9]*/status r,
@{PROC}/[0-9]*/task/[0-9]*/stat r,
Thank you. Apart from those, these were needed in the same file, in the
sandbox section.
@{PROC}/ r,
@{PROC}/[0-9]*/ r,
@{PROC}/[0-9]*/fd/ r,
@{PROC}/[0-9]*/oom_adj w,
@{PROC}/[0-9]*/oom_score_adj w,
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
Necessity is the mother of invention.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937723
Title:
apparmor is logging too many messages
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/937723/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 809277] Re: telepathy-haze crashed with SIGSEGV in peer_connection_find_by_type()
Seen on my box with Precise 12.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809277 Title: telepathy-haze crashed with SIGSEGV in peer_connection_find_by_type() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/telepathy-haze/+bug/809277/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 913296] Re: alt+tab does not work with drag and drop
The problem statements is explained well. Please fix this issue. This is a big usability problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913296 Title: alt+tab does not work with drag and drop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/913296/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 913296] Re: alt+tab does not work with drag and drop
By the way, this was filed under 11.10. I am seeing the same problem on 12.04 Precise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913296 Title: alt+tab does not work with drag and drop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/913296/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 938832] Re: application menu not shown anymore
On Thursday 23 February 2012 02:30 AM, Omer Akram wrote: which app are you trying it with? seems to work just fine with terminal for me. With none did it work. I tried with: Chromium Browser, ThunderBird, Pidgin, Konsole. It used to work. Some time recently it broke. Are you on the save versions of Unity and AppMenu ? -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938832 Title: application menu not shown anymore To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/938832/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 938832] Re: application menu not shown anymore
On Thursday 23 February 2012 06:14 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: On Thursday 23 February 2012 02:30 AM, Omer Akram wrote: which app are you trying it with? seems to work just fine with terminal for me. With none did it work. I tried with: Chromium Browser, ThunderBird, Pidgin, Konsole. It used to work. Some time recently it broke. Are you on the save versions of Unity and AppMenu ? My wild guess is it would have things to do with the fix for: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923410 -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938832 Title: application menu not shown anymore To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/938832/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 938832] [NEW] application menu not shown anymore
Public bug reported: Before pushing HUD to Precise, long pressing the Alt key would show the menu bar. Once HUD was pushed, I can no longed see the menu using the keyboard. I need to hover the mouse in the top bar to see it. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: unity 5.4.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.26-generic 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.92-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,composite,opengl,compiztoolbox,decor,resize,regex,snap,imgpng,move,vpswitch,place,grid,animation,mousepoll,gnomecompat,wall,expo,session,workarounds,fade,scale,ezoom,scalefilter,unityshell,scaleaddon] Date: Wed Feb 22 22:30:23 2012 SourcePackage: unity UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-24 (28 days ago) ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938832 Title: application menu not shown anymore To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/938832/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 938832] Re: application menu not shown anymore
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938832 Title: application menu not shown anymore To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/938832/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 937723] [NEW] apparmor is logging too many messages
Public bug reported: Since one of the recent updates, apparmor is flooding way too many messages. This would lead to a power hungry os. You can see in the below snippet, apparmor logged way too many messages to /var/log/syslog in less than a 2 minute time span. Feb 21 17:12:51 champaran kernel: [ 2826.760565] type=1400 audit(1329824571.347:948): apparmor=ALLOWED operation=open parent=1 profile=/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser name=/proc/6817/task/6827/stat pid=5597 comm=chromium-browse requested_mask=r denied_mask=r fsuid=1000 ouid=0 Feb 21 17:12:51 champaran kernel: [ 2826.760694] type=1400 audit(1329824571.347:949): apparmor=ALLOWED operation=open parent=1 profile=/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser name=/proc/6817/task/6842/stat pid=5597 comm=chromium-browse requested_mask=r denied_mask=r fsuid=1000 ouid=0 Feb 21 17:13:18 champaran kernel: [ 2854.209452] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:22:68:1b:af:4a:00:1a:30:98:4c:00:08:00 SRC=10.42.64.101 DST=10.73.5.88 LEN=34 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=120 ID=24884 PROTO=UDP SPT=9877 DPT=9876 LEN=14 Feb 21 17:13:21 champaran kernel: [ 2856.600295] type=1400 audit(1329824601.187:950): apparmor=ALLOWED operation=open parent=1 profile=/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser name=/proc/6800/task/6800/stat pid=5597 comm=chromium-browse requested_mask=r denied_mask=r fsuid=1000 ouid=0 Feb 21 17:13:21 champaran kernel: [ 2856.600646] type=1400 audit(1329824601.187:951): apparmor=ALLOWED operation=open parent=1 profile=/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser name=/proc/6800/task/6804/stat pid=5597 comm=chromium-browse requested_mask=r denied_mask=r fsuid=1000 ouid=0 Feb 21 17:13:21 champaran kernel: [ 2856.600777] type=1400 audit(1329824601.187:952): apparmor=ALLOWED operation=open parent=1 profile=/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser name=/proc/6800/task/6805/stat pid=5597 comm=chromium-browse requested_mask=r denied_mask=r fsuid=1000 ouid=0 Feb 21 17:13:21 champaran kernel: [ 2856.600905] type=1400 audit(1329824601.187:953): apparmor=ALLOWED operation=open parent=1 profile=/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser name=/proc/6800/task/6819/stat pid=5597 comm=chromium-browse requested_mask=r denied_mask=r fsuid=1000 ouid=0 Feb 21 17:13:21 champaran kernel: [ 2856.52] type=1400 audit(1329824601.367:954): apparmor=ALLOWED operation=open parent=1 profile=/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser name=/proc/6817/task/6817/stat pid=5597 comm=chromium-browse requested_mask=r denied_mask=r fsuid=1000 ouid=0 Feb 21 17:13:21 champaran kernel: [ 2856.777953] type=1400 audit(1329824601.367:955): apparmor=ALLOWED operation=open parent=1 profile=/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser name=/proc/6817/task/6822/stat pid=5597 comm=chromium-browse requested_mask=r denied_mask=r fsuid=1000 ouid=0 Feb 21 17:13:21 champaran kernel: [ 2856.778084] type=1400 audit(1329824601.367:956): apparmor=ALLOWED operation=open parent=1 profile=/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser name=/proc/6817/task/6827/stat pid=5597 comm=chromium-browse requested_mask=r denied_mask=r fsuid=1000 ouid=0 Feb 21 17:13:21 champaran kernel: [ 2856.778213] type=1400 audit(1329824601.367:957): apparmor=ALLOWED operation=open parent=1 profile=/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser name=/proc/6817/task/6842/stat pid=5597 comm=chromium-browse requested_mask=r denied_mask=r fsuid=1000 ouid=0 Feb 21 17:13:22 champaran kernel: [ 2857.601610] type=1400 audit(1329824602.187:958): apparmor=ALLOWED operation=open parent=1 profile=/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser name=/proc/6800/task/6800/stat pid=5597 comm=chromium-browse requested_mask=r denied_mask=r fsuid=1000 ouid=0 Feb 21 17:13:22 champaran kernel: [ 2857.601819] type=1400 audit(1329824602.187:959): apparmor=ALLOWED operation=open parent=1 profile=/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser name=/proc/6800/task/6804/stat pid=5597 comm=chromium-browse requested_mask=r denied_mask=r fsuid=1000 ouid=0 Feb 21 17:13:27 champaran kernel: [ 2862.479563] audit_printk_skb: 66 callbacks suppressed Feb 21 17:13:27 champaran kernel: [ 2862.479572] type=1400 audit(1329824607.067:982): apparmor=ALLOWED operation=open parent=1 profile=/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser name=/proc/6800/task/6800/stat pid=5597 comm=chromium-browse requested_mask=r denied_mask=r fsuid=1000 ouid=0 Feb 21 17:13:27 champaran kernel: [ 2862.479781] type=1400 audit(1329824607.067:983): apparmor=ALLOWED operation=open parent=1 profile=/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser name=/proc/6800/task/6804/stat pid=5597 comm=chromium-browse requested_mask=r denied_mask=r fsuid=1000 ouid=0 Feb 21 17:13:27 champaran kernel: [ 2862.479912] type=1400 audit(1329824607.067:984): apparmor=ALLOWED operation=open parent=1 profile=/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser name=/proc/6800/task/6805/stat pid=5597 comm=chromium-browse requested_mask=r denied_mask=r fsuid=1000 ouid=0 Feb 21 17:13:27 champaran
[Bug 937720] Re: monitor.py crashed with TypeError in call_blocking(): Expected a string or unicode object
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 628432 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628432 ** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937720 Title: monitor.py crashed with TypeError in call_blocking(): Expected a string or unicode object To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wicd/+bug/937720/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 937723] Re: apparmor is logging too many messages
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937723 Title: apparmor is logging too many messages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/937723/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 937720] Re: monitor.py crashed with TypeError in call_blocking(): Expected a string or unicode object
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 628432 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628432 Sorry. Duplicate report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wicd/+bug/936825 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937720 Title: monitor.py crashed with TypeError in call_blocking(): Expected a string or unicode object To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wicd/+bug/937720/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 937134] [NEW] font color set incorrect in deja-dup backup
Public bug reported: Attached screenshot has all the details. As you can see in it, only the selected text is visible. Rest also blends in well, with the white background. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: deja-dup 21.2-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.26-generic 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Feb 20 23:42:37 2012 SourcePackage: deja-dup UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-24 (26 days ago) ** Affects: deja-dup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937134 Title: font color set incorrect in deja-dup backup To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/937134/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 937134] Re: font color set incorrect in deja-dup backup
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937134 Title: font color set incorrect in deja-dup backup To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/937134/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 937134] Re: font color set incorrect in deja-dup backup
screenshot with the problem explained ** Attachment added: Screenshot at 2012-02-20 23:41:55.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/937134/+attachment/2762834/+files/Screenshot%20at%202012-02-20%2023%3A41%3A55.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937134 Title: font color set incorrect in deja-dup backup To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/937134/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 937238] [NEW] music collection not shown in lens
Public bug reported: There are reports of some music listed in their dash view. For me, it has been zero. Though Rhythmbox has my entire collection, nothing pops up in the dash. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: unity-lens-music 5.4.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.26-generic 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Feb 21 02:10:15 2012 SourcePackage: unity-lens-music UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-24 (27 days ago) ** Affects: unity-lens-music (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937238 Title: music collection not shown in lens To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-lens-music/+bug/937238/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 937238] Re: music collection not shown in lens
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937238 Title: music collection not shown in lens To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-lens-music/+bug/937238/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 936756] [NEW] lxc complains about cgroup not available
Public bug reported: I have been trying to work with lxc to make use of my uml image. My config is as follows: 12:21:05 rrs@champaran:~$ cat /var/lib/lxc/test/config lxc.utsname = test lxc.rootfs = /home/rrs/Debian-Wheezy-AMD64-root_fs lxc.rootfs.mount = /tmp/foo lxc.cgroup.cpuset.cpus = 0,1 lxc.cgroup.cpu.shares = 1234 lxc.cgroup.devices.deny = a lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 1:3 rw lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = b 8:0 rw #lxc.mount = /etc/fstab.complex lxc.mount.entry = /lib /root/myrootfs/lib none ro,bind 0 0 lxc.cap.drop = sys_module mknod setuid net_raw lxc.cap.drop = mac_override When I try to start the instance, I get the following error: 12:16:04 rrs@champaran:~$ sudo lxc-start -n test lxc-start: cgroup is not mounted lxc-start: failed to setup the cgroups for 'test' lxc-start: failed to setup the container lxc-start: invalid sequence number 1. expected 2 lxc-start: failed to spawn 'test' But as you can see below, cgroup is already mounted. 12:16:49 rrs@champaran:~$ mount /dev/sda6 on / type ext4 (rw,errors=remount-ro,commit=600) proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) none on /sys/fs/fuse/connections type fusectl (rw) none on /sys/kernel/debug type debugfs (rw) none on /sys/kernel/security type securityfs (rw) udev on /dev type devtmpfs (rw,mode=0755) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,noexec,nosuid,gid=5,mode=0620) tmpfs on /run type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,size=10%,mode=0755) none on /run/lock type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,size=5242880) none on /run/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev) /dev/sda2 on /boot type ext4 (rw,commit=600) binfmt_misc on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) cgroups on /sys/fs/cgroup type tmpfs (rw,uid=0,gid=0,mode=0755) gvfs-fuse-daemon on /home/rrs/.cache/gvfs type fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon (rw,nosuid,nodev,user=rrs) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: lxc 0.7.5-3ubuntu28 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.26-generic 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Feb 20 12:17:21 2012 SourcePackage: lxc UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-24 (26 days ago) mtime.conffile..etc.default.lxc: 2012-01-25T01:58:25.599609 ** Affects: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936756 Title: lxc complains about cgroup not available To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/936756/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 936756] Re: lxc complains about cgroup not available
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936756 Title: lxc complains about cgroup not available To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/936756/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 936756] Re: lxc complains about cgroup not available
actually, this must be a problem at my end. I just tried with lxc- create, and it was able to create a container. Sorry for the noise. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936756 Title: lxc complains about cgroup not available To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/936756/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 921407] Re: application window does not get the focus returned
I am now on: ii unity 5.4.0-0ubuntu1 Interface designed for efficiency of space and interaction. and the buggy behavior still persists. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921407 Title: application window does not get the focus returned To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/921407/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 936756] Re: lxc complains about cgroup not available
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936756 Title: lxc complains about cgroup not available To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/936756/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 936756] [NEW] lxc complains about cgroup not available
Public bug reported: I have been trying to work with lxc to make use of my uml image. My config is as follows: 12:21:05 rrs@champaran:~$ cat /var/lib/lxc/test/config lxc.utsname = test lxc.rootfs = /home/rrs/Debian-Wheezy-AMD64-root_fs lxc.rootfs.mount = /tmp/foo lxc.cgroup.cpuset.cpus = 0,1 lxc.cgroup.cpu.shares = 1234 lxc.cgroup.devices.deny = a lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 1:3 rw lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = b 8:0 rw #lxc.mount = /etc/fstab.complex lxc.mount.entry = /lib /root/myrootfs/lib none ro,bind 0 0 lxc.cap.drop = sys_module mknod setuid net_raw lxc.cap.drop = mac_override When I try to start the instance, I get the following error: 12:16:04 rrs@champaran:~$ sudo lxc-start -n test lxc-start: cgroup is not mounted lxc-start: failed to setup the cgroups for 'test' lxc-start: failed to setup the container lxc-start: invalid sequence number 1. expected 2 lxc-start: failed to spawn 'test' But as you can see below, cgroup is already mounted. 12:16:49 rrs@champaran:~$ mount /dev/sda6 on / type ext4 (rw,errors=remount-ro,commit=600) proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) none on /sys/fs/fuse/connections type fusectl (rw) none on /sys/kernel/debug type debugfs (rw) none on /sys/kernel/security type securityfs (rw) udev on /dev type devtmpfs (rw,mode=0755) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,noexec,nosuid,gid=5,mode=0620) tmpfs on /run type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,size=10%,mode=0755) none on /run/lock type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,size=5242880) none on /run/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev) /dev/sda2 on /boot type ext4 (rw,commit=600) binfmt_misc on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) cgroups on /sys/fs/cgroup type tmpfs (rw,uid=0,gid=0,mode=0755) gvfs-fuse-daemon on /home/rrs/.cache/gvfs type fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon (rw,nosuid,nodev,user=rrs) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: lxc 0.7.5-3ubuntu28 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.26-generic 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Feb 20 12:17:21 2012 SourcePackage: lxc UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-24 (26 days ago) mtime.conffile..etc.default.lxc: 2012-01-25T01:58:25.599609 ** Affects: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936756 Title: lxc complains about cgroup not available To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/936756/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 936756] Re: lxc complains about cgroup not available
actually, this must be a problem at my end. I just tried with lxc- create, and it was able to create a container. Sorry for the noise. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936756 Title: lxc complains about cgroup not available To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/936756/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 935978] [NEW] use tab to cycle through options
Public bug reported: please add an option to allow to cycle through the HUD result using the TAB key. Currently, when HUD is activated and it displays a result with more than 2 choices, a user can cycle only using the arrow keys. Please allow use of the TAB key. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: unity 5.4.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-16.25-generic 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-16-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,composite,opengl,compiztoolbox,decor,resize,regex,snap,imgpng,move,vpswitch,place,grid,animation,mousepoll,gnomecompat,wall,expo,session,workarounds,fade,scale,ezoom,scalefilter,unityshell,scaleaddon] Date: Sun Feb 19 12:31:47 2012 SourcePackage: unity UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-24 (25 days ago) ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/935978 Title: use tab to cycle through options To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/935978/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 935978] Re: use tab to cycle through options
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/935978 Title: use tab to cycle through options To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/935978/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 934772] Re: place replies in same folder option is not honored
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934772 Title: place replies in same folder option is not honored To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/934772/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 934772] [NEW] place replies in same folder option is not honored
Public bug reported: Somewhere recently, I think with 11.x thunderbird release, the Place replies in same folder option stopped working. I am on -up-to-date Precise Pangolin ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: thunderbird 11.0~b2+build2-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-16.25-generic 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-16-generic x86_64 AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24. ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: rrs4412 F pulseaudio BuildID: 20120217115706 Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xfc02 irq 49' Mixer name : 'Conexant CX20561 (Hermosa)' Components : 'HDA:14f15051,17aa211c,0010' Controls : 17 Simple ctrls : 12 Card29.Amixer.info: Card hw:29 'ThinkPadEC'/'ThinkPad Console Audio Control at EC reg 0x30, fw 7VHT16WW-1.06' Mixer name : 'ThinkPad EC 7VHT16WW-1.06' Components : '' Controls : 1 Simple ctrls : 1 Card29.Amixer.values: Simple mixer control 'Console',0 Capabilities: pswitch pswitch-joined penum Playback channels: Mono Mono: Playback [on] Channel: beta Date: Sat Feb 18 12:02:54 2012 ForcedLayersAccel: False IfupdownConfig: auto lo iface lo inet loopback IncompatibleExtensions: EDS Contact Integration - ID=edsintegrat...@mozilla.com, Version=0.3.9, minVersion=7.0, maxVersion=11.0a1, Location=app-global, Type=extension, Active=Yes Plugins: Shockwave Flash - Lib=libflashplayer.so, Location=/usr/lib/flashplugin-installer IcedTea-Web Plugin (using IcedTea-Web 1.2pre (1.2~pre1-0ubuntu2)) - Lib=IcedTeaPlugin.so, Location=/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/amd64 Skype Buttons for Kopete - Lib=skypebuttons.so, Location=/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins 2007 Microsoft Office system (CrossOver - NPOFF12.DLL) - Lib=dosdevices_c^3A_Program+Files_Netscape_Communicator_Program_Plugins_NPOFF12.DLL.so, Location=/home/rrs/.cxoffice/Microsoft Office 2007/desktopdata/cxnsplugin/linux64 iTunes Application Detector - Lib=librhythmbox-itms-detection-plugin.so, Location=/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins Profiles: Profile0 (Default) - LastVersion=11.0/20120217115706 (Running) RunningIncompatibleAddons: True SourcePackage: thunderbird UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-24 (24 days ago) UserJS: network.protocol-handler.external.picasa - true network.protocol-handler.app.picasa - /usr/bin/picasa dmi.bios.date: 12/06/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO dmi.bios.version: 7UET91WW (3.21 ) dmi.board.name: 6475KH8 dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO dmi.board.version: Not Available dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO dmi.chassis.version: Not Available dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr7UET91WW(3.21):bd12/06/2010:svnLENOVO:pn6475KH8:pvrThinkPadT400:rvnLENOVO:rn6475KH8:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable: dmi.product.name: 6475KH8 dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T400 dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO ** Affects: thunderbird (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug beta-channel precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934772 Title: place replies in same folder option is not honored To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/934772/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 921407] Re: application window does not get the focus returned
This was seen with Unity 5.2.0+bzr1971ubuntu0+644. Perhaps this was pushed to the unity ppa. That's how I got it. 21:13:47 rrs@champaran:~$ apt-cache policy unity unity: Installed: 5.2.0+bzr1971ubuntu0+644 Candidate: 5.2.0+bzr1971ubuntu0+644 Version table: *** 5.2.0+bzr1971ubuntu0+644 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 5.2.0-0ubuntu4 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages ** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New ** Changed in: unity Status: Invalid = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921407 Title: application window does not get the focus returned To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/921407/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 921407] Re: application window does not get the focus returned
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 09:15 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: This was seen with Unity 5.2.0+bzr1971ubuntu0+644. Perhaps this was pushed to the unity ppa. That's how I got it. I mean recently again with the listed version. And I can see that the issue is not fixed. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921407 Title: application window does not get the focus returned To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/921407/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 931896] [NEW] please provide an indicator-others interface
Public bug reported: While Unity is elegant, it is at times coming in ways of what I want to do as a user. I have been a KDE user and very recently (12.04 aplha1) migrated to Unity. All my passwords are stored in kwallet. I tried to open my wallet application but nothing showed up. Probably because kwallet, on start-up, would simply run minimized in the systray. But Unity's default whitelist is very trimmed. So, please provide an indicator-others thing in Unity, where every application not in the whitelist falls. This way we can access and use our other apps also. And also it does not clutter the Unity indicator area. PS: You have done great work with appmenu. It makes both KDE and GTK apps look similar. Please do something similar for Unity indicators. PPS: This is a wishlist bug. I couldn't find a way in ubunut-bug to file a wishlist bug. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: unity 5.2.0-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-15.24-generic 3.2.5 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-15-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,compiztoolbox,decor,resize,regex,snap,imgpng,move,vpswitch,place,grid,animation,mousepoll,gnomecompat,wall,expo,session,workarounds,fade,scale,ezoom,unityshell] Date: Tue Feb 14 12:15:53 2012 SourcePackage: unity UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-24 (20 days ago) ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931896 Title: please provide an indicator-others interface To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/931896/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 931896] Re: please provide an indicator-others interface
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931896 Title: please provide an indicator-others interface To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/931896/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 754487] Re: typo in entry for 'reeve'
Fixed in 0.48.1 ** Changed in: dict-gcide (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754487 Title: typo in entry for 'reeve' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dict-gcide/+bug/754487/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 754487] Re: typo in entry for 'reeve'
This was fixed in 0.48.1. Should this be closed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754487 Title: typo in entry for 'reeve' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dict-gcide/+bug/754487/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 925511] Re: lxc init script should fail when it ... failed
On Wednesday 08 February 2012 03:54 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote: @Ritesh, Unfortunately I don't know that that many people would read the README :) It is worth adding though, thanks for the suggestion. In addition, I will add an LXC section to the ubuntu server guide soon, and this should be mentioned there. I'm also marking this (and the equivalent libvirt) bugs as affecting dnsmasq. Perhaps we can do something to its default configuration to be less belligerant. Maybe even just an explicit '--except-interface=virbr0,lxcbr0', though hard-coding that seems a bit ugly. Serge, IMO the better option would be to just ship a binder in /etc/dnsmasq.d/ dnsmasq is a personal dns caching service. I doubt if anyone is using it as a bind replacement. By shipping a dnsmasq sub conf file (and making it bind to loopback only), you eliminate the need to track the list of virtual bridges. Then, you also don't need to spawn off your own dnsmasq proc from the lxc init script. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925511 Title: lxc init script should fail when it ... failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/925511/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 925511] Re: lxc init script should fail when it ... failed
On Wednesday 08 February 2012 03:54 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote: @Ritesh, Unfortunately I don't know that that many people would read the README :) It is worth adding though, thanks for the suggestion. In addition, I will add an LXC section to the ubuntu server guide soon, and this should be mentioned there. I'm also marking this (and the equivalent libvirt) bugs as affecting dnsmasq. Perhaps we can do something to its default configuration to be less belligerant. Maybe even just an explicit '--except-interface=virbr0,lxcbr0', though hard-coding that seems a bit ugly. Serge, IMO the better option would be to just ship a binder in /etc/dnsmasq.d/ dnsmasq is a personal dns caching service. I doubt if anyone is using it as a bind replacement. By shipping a dnsmasq sub conf file (and making it bind to loopback only), you eliminate the need to track the list of virtual bridges. Then, you also don't need to spawn off your own dnsmasq proc from the lxc init script. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925511 Title: lxc init script should fail when it ... failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/925511/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 921407] Re: application window does not get the focus returned
On Thursday 09 February 2012 06:11 AM, Bilal Akhtar wrote: You seemed to be on an old Unity HUD build. Did recent builds fix the issue for you? I can't confirm that. The problem was annoying enough that I moved back to the stock unity from precise repo. Sorry about that. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921407 Title: application window does not get the focus returned To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/921407/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 925511] Re: lxc init script should fail when it ... failed
On Tuesday 07 February 2012 09:19 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: @Ritesh, the dnsmasq for the lxc bridge explicitly binds only lxcbr0. So if that fails, then your other dnsmasq has already bound all interfaces. Yes. Because I had dnsmasq installed by default. From the dnsmasq.conf file's documentation, it says: # On systems which support it, dnsmasq binds the wildcard address, # even when it is listening on only some interfaces. It then discards # requests that it shouldn't reply to. This has the advantage of # working even when interfaces come and go and change address. If you # want dnsmasq to really bind only the interfaces it is listening on, # uncomment this option. About the only time you may need this is when # running another nameserver on the same machine. #bind-interfaces So any machine, where dnsmasq is installed, will bind to all the interfaces. This is the _default_ behavior, as installed. libvirt was doing something similar. http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-libvirt/libvirt.git;a=blob;f=debian/README.Debian;h=6248662c56111c4ec4a5b2c0887059ddfb5fdda6;hb=HEAD They bind dnsmasq to the loopback interface. Since LXC's bridge also has similar purpose, it could try to do similar things. If /etc/init.d/lxc fails to start now, then lxcbr0 never had dhcp before. If you're not using lxcbr0 for your containers, then you can simply set USE_LXC_BRIDGE=false in /etc/default/lxc. I haven't started using it yet. So I'm not sure how it has been behaving up till now. If do want to use lxcbr0, then you should change your other dnsmasq to not bind all interfaces. Yes. But would you want this to be a default? Or actually, just adding a similar documentation into LXC's README.Debian will also suffice. No? A third alternative, I suppose, would be that you want to use lxcbr0 but your statically assign addresses to your containers. We could add a USE_LXC_BRIDGE_DNSMASQ variable to /etc/default/lxc to support that use case. If that is what you want, please open a new bug against lxc and I'll add it. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925511 Title: lxc init script should fail when it ... failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/925511/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 925511] Re: lxc init script should fail when it ... failed
On Tuesday 07 February 2012 09:19 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: @Ritesh, the dnsmasq for the lxc bridge explicitly binds only lxcbr0. So if that fails, then your other dnsmasq has already bound all interfaces. Yes. Because I had dnsmasq installed by default. From the dnsmasq.conf file's documentation, it says: # On systems which support it, dnsmasq binds the wildcard address, # even when it is listening on only some interfaces. It then discards # requests that it shouldn't reply to. This has the advantage of # working even when interfaces come and go and change address. If you # want dnsmasq to really bind only the interfaces it is listening on, # uncomment this option. About the only time you may need this is when # running another nameserver on the same machine. #bind-interfaces So any machine, where dnsmasq is installed, will bind to all the interfaces. This is the _default_ behavior, as installed. libvirt was doing something similar. http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-libvirt/libvirt.git;a=blob;f=debian/README.Debian;h=6248662c56111c4ec4a5b2c0887059ddfb5fdda6;hb=HEAD They bind dnsmasq to the loopback interface. Since LXC's bridge also has similar purpose, it could try to do similar things. If /etc/init.d/lxc fails to start now, then lxcbr0 never had dhcp before. If you're not using lxcbr0 for your containers, then you can simply set USE_LXC_BRIDGE=false in /etc/default/lxc. I haven't started using it yet. So I'm not sure how it has been behaving up till now. If do want to use lxcbr0, then you should change your other dnsmasq to not bind all interfaces. Yes. But would you want this to be a default? Or actually, just adding a similar documentation into LXC's README.Debian will also suffice. No? A third alternative, I suppose, would be that you want to use lxcbr0 but your statically assign addresses to your containers. We could add a USE_LXC_BRIDGE_DNSMASQ variable to /etc/default/lxc to support that use case. If that is what you want, please open a new bug against lxc and I'll add it. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925511 Title: lxc init script should fail when it ... failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/925511/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 925511] Re: lxc init script should fail when it ... failed
So how is it supposed to behave now? I just did the upgrade and: Setting up lxc (0.7.5-3ubuntu18) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/lxc ... * Starting Linux Containers dnsmasq: failed to create listening socket for 172.16.3.1: Address already in use * Failed to set up LXC network invoke-rc.d: initscript lxc, action start failed. dpkg: error processing lxc (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Setting up ssh-askpass-gnome (1:5.9p1-2ubuntu2) ... Setting up libcgroup1 (0.37.1-1ubuntu10) ... Setting up cgroup-bin (0.37.1-1ubuntu10) ... cgconfig start/running Setting up libqtgui4 (4:4.8.0-1ubuntu5) ... Shutting down dnsmasq allowed for the installation to complete. But now, I cannot start my dnsmasq service. 12:16:19 rrs@champaran:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/dnsmasq restart [sudo] password for rrs: * Restarting DNS forwarder and DHCP server dnsmasq dnsmasq: failed to create listening socket for port 53: Address already in use [fail] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925511 Title: lxc init script should fail when it ... failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/925511/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 925511] Re: lxc init script should fail when it ... failed
So how is it supposed to behave now? I just did the upgrade and: Setting up lxc (0.7.5-3ubuntu18) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/lxc ... * Starting Linux Containers dnsmasq: failed to create listening socket for 172.16.3.1: Address already in use * Failed to set up LXC network invoke-rc.d: initscript lxc, action start failed. dpkg: error processing lxc (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Setting up ssh-askpass-gnome (1:5.9p1-2ubuntu2) ... Setting up libcgroup1 (0.37.1-1ubuntu10) ... Setting up cgroup-bin (0.37.1-1ubuntu10) ... cgconfig start/running Setting up libqtgui4 (4:4.8.0-1ubuntu5) ... Shutting down dnsmasq allowed for the installation to complete. But now, I cannot start my dnsmasq service. 12:16:19 rrs@champaran:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/dnsmasq restart [sudo] password for rrs: * Restarting DNS forwarder and DHCP server dnsmasq dnsmasq: failed to create listening socket for port 53: Address already in use [fail] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925511 Title: lxc init script should fail when it ... failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/925511/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 846885] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in g_simple_async_result_complete()
Seen with 12.04 on my laptop also. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846885 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in g_simple_async_result_complete() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/846885/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 923696] [NEW] package digikam-doc (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/digikam/index.cache.bz2', which is also in package digikam-data 2:2.4.
Public bug reported: During installation of digikam-doc, it failed. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: digikam-doc (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-12.20-generic 3.2.2 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-12-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Jan 30 17:29:41 2012 DuplicateSignature: Unpacking digikam-doc (from .../digikam-doc_1.2~svn1134171-1_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/digikam-doc_1.2~svn1134171-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/digikam/index.cache.bz2', which is also in package digikam-data 2:2.4.1-0ubuntu3 ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/digikam/index.cache.bz2', which is also in package digikam-data 2:2.4.1-0ubuntu3 SourcePackage: digikam-doc Title: package digikam-doc (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/digikam/index.cache.bz2', which is also in package digikam-data 2:2.4.1-0ubuntu3 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-24 (5 days ago) ** Affects: digikam-doc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package package-conflict precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923696 Title: package digikam-doc (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/digikam/index.cache.bz2', which is also in package digikam-data 2:2.4.1-0ubuntu3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/digikam-doc/+bug/923696/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 923696] Re: package digikam-doc (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/digikam/index.cache.bz2', which is also in package digikam-data 2:2.4.1-
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923696 Title: package digikam-doc (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/digikam/index.cache.bz2', which is also in package digikam-data 2:2.4.1-0ubuntu3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/digikam-doc/+bug/923696/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 921998] Re: unity-greeter crashed with SIGSEGV in indicator_object_get_entries()
On 01/28/2012 04:24 AM, LaMont Jones wrote: Somewhere in the pile, there is a missing Depends: indicator-datetime indicator-power. Installing both of those packages lets the unity- greeter run again. The failure mode of X constantly launching something that dies does make debugging it rather painful. It would be good to wrap unity-greeter with something that counts how many times it dies, and if it gets high enough, STOPS LAUNCHING IT and does a sleep 999h. That way, one can switch to another vt to deal with it, instead of needing to reboot, break, and chmod a-x /usr/bin/X or so to get it to stop hurting so much. Totally agree. The way the failure occured, it tooks my a couple reboots to narrow it down to libghtdm. Even saKing the process didn't help. It froze the system. Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921998 Title: unity-greeter crashed with SIGSEGV in indicator_object_get_entries() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-greeter/+bug/921998/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 922995] [NEW] libindicator friendly icon
Public bug reported: Given that Ubuntu's artwork team is trying to bring a clean and uniform visual experience, there should be a matching wicd system tray applet. The current applet is colorful and does not match with the other applets. ** Affects: wicd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922995 Title: libindicator friendly icon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wicd/+bug/922995/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 920956] [NEW] Kpartx interferes with automount behaviour
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Cefn launchpad@cefn.com wrote: Public bug reported: I tried plugging in an external USB drive for the first time after installing kpartx and multipath-tools, expecting it to automount through Gnome/Nautilus to /media/ . Only after removing kpartx did the automount behaviour return. Maybe you are hit by this: http://researchut.com/site/blog/seagate-freeagent-goflex -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920956 Title: Kpartx interferes with automount behaviour To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/920956/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 920956] [NEW] Kpartx interferes with automount behaviour
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Cefn launchpad@cefn.com wrote: Public bug reported: I tried plugging in an external USB drive for the first time after installing kpartx and multipath-tools, expecting it to automount through Gnome/Nautilus to /media/ . Only after removing kpartx did the automount behaviour return. Maybe you are hit by this: http://researchut.com/site/blog/seagate-freeagent-goflex -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920956 Title: Kpartx interferes with automount behaviour To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/920956/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 896920] Re: [Bug 897713] [NEW] dont work in Ubuntu 11.10, due kernel 3.0.0
On 11/29/2011 08:23 PM, Jonas Björk wrote:
Public bug reported:
I installed laptop-mode-tools in Ubuntu 11.10 (amd64) and got this
message:
Ställer in laptop-mode-tools (1.57-1ubuntu1) ...
* Enabling laptop mode...
Unhandled kernel version: 3.0 ('uname -r' = '3.0.0-13-generic')
Couldn't acquire lock. Retrying
Unhandled kernel version: 3.0 ('uname -r' = '3.0.0-13-generic')
** Affects: laptop-mode-tools
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
This is fixed in 1.58 and above which I believe is going to be part of
the Precise release.
Whether it will be fixed for 11.10, I'm not sure. I don't know what the
backport policy is.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/896920
Title:
laptop-mode: Unhandled kernel version: 3.0
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laptop-mode-tools/+bug/896920/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 474286] Re: support for sched_smt_power_savings
** Also affects: laptop-mode-tools Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: laptop-mode-tools Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474286 Title: support for sched_smt_power_savings To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/laptop-mode-tools/+bug/474286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 801706] Re: fusecompress should depend on the fuse-utils package
On 06/26/2011 03:37 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: Good to hear! If after a week he has not responded, you should file a bug. You should be sure to attach the patch and tag it as such in the BTS! That way, if this package needs a NMU or what have you, they can consider including the patch. Good luck! http://bugs.debian.org/633353 I've orphaned fusecompress since I do not use it and do not have the time to maintain it. If you have an interest in fusecompress and would also like to maintain in Debian, let me know. You can either become the maintainer for it (Assuming you are a DD/DM), or else, you can work with me in co-maintaining it. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801706 Title: fusecompress should depend on the fuse-utils package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fusecompress/+bug/801706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 801706] Re: fusecompress should depend on the fuse-utils package
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #633353 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633353 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801706 Title: fusecompress should depend on the fuse-utils package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fusecompress/+bug/801706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 801623] [NEW] Kernel version 3.0 not supported
On 06/24/2011 09:15 PM, John Cooper wrote:
Public bug reported:
With the latest oneiric 3.0 kernel version
I get the following in /var/log/syslog
laptop-mode: Unhandled kernel version: 3.0 ('uname -r' =
'3.0-1-generic')
I have added s 3.0);; to the file /usr/sbin/laptop_mode about line 506
so it reads as follows:
case $KLEVEL in
2.4 ) ;;
2.6 ) ;;
3.0 ) ;;
*)
log ERR Unhandled kernel version: $KLEVEL ('uname -r' =
'$(uname -r)') 2
exit 1
;;
A new release is due any time soon. That will solve this problem.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801623
Title:
Kernel version 3.0 not supported
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laptop-mode-tools/+bug/801623/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 772961] Re: laptop-mode outputs data to syslog that causes hard drive spinups
On 05/09/2011 02:14 AM, PeterPall wrote: You are right: Technically syslogd did cause the hard drive spin-ups. But it did this due to the laptop-mode messages; did mount the /var/log directory as tmpfs as a temporary measure. No. laptop-mode will log to syslog only once, during trigger. after that, unless a new event generates, laptop-mode does not trigger. There must be something else logging to syslog then. FYI, we do alter syslog to not do an fsync. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772961 Title: laptop-mode outputs data to syslog that causes hard drive spinups -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
