[Bug 1945774] Re: openssl: breaks ssl-cert installation: 8022CB35777F0000:error:1200007A:random number generator:RAND_write_file:Not a regular file:../crypto/rand/randfile.c:190:Filename=/dev/urandom

2024-04-10 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
Apparently this is still happening in Jammy for some reason (maybe a regression), as according to this [1] bug report claiming that this bug is the cause of it. This is the command that I run to hit it (doesn't need anything in particular for the command to work, can run anywhere such as a fresh

[Bug 1945774] Re: openssl: breaks ssl-cert installation: 8022CB35777F0000:error:1200007A:random number generator:RAND_write_file:Not a regular file:../crypto/rand/randfile.c:190:Filename=/dev/urandom

2024-04-10 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Also affects: ssl-cert (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: hplip (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1728031] Re: [SRU] Unable to change user password when ENFORCE_PASSWORD_CHECK is True

2024-04-10 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Also affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: Ubuntu Mantic Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: Ubuntu Focal Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: Ubuntu Jammy Importance: Undecided Status: New **

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-04-02 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
SRU for bug LP#1728031 is now ready as well so it can be picked up and merged with this one -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055409 Title: [SRU] config

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-03-21 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Patch added: "lp2055409-focal.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2055409/+attachment/5758154/+files/lp2055409-focal.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-03-21 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Patch added: "lp2055409-focal-victoria.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2055409/+attachment/5758153/+files/lp2055409-focal-victoria.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-03-21 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Patch added: "lp2055409-focal-wallaby.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2055409/+attachment/5758152/+files/lp2055409-focal-wallaby.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-03-21 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Patch added: "lp2055409-focal-xena.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2055409/+attachment/5758151/+files/lp2055409-focal-xena.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-03-21 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
actually, this one needs to be SRU'ed back to Ussuri, while LP#1728031 is up to yoga -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055409 Title: [SRU] config

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-03-20 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
I have also just fixed bug LP#1728031 and backporting that all the way to yoga, to it is best to wait for that and combine with a single SRU. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055409

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-03-05 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
The tag 23.0.1 for zed has been created, so I deleted the jammy-zed attachment ** Attachment removed: "lp2055409-jammy-zed.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2055409/+attachment/5752375/+files/lp2055409-jammy-zed.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-03-04 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Patch added: "lp2055409-jammy.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2055409/+attachment/5752376/+files/lp2055409-jammy.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-03-04 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Patch added: "lp2055409-lunar.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2055409/+attachment/5752374/+files/lp2055409-lunar.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-03-04 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Patch added: "lp2055409-jammy-zed.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2055409/+attachment/5752375/+files/lp2055409-jammy-zed.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-03-04 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Patch added: "lp2055409-mantic.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2055409/+attachment/5752373/+files/lp2055409-mantic.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-03-04 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
As I was creating the debdiffs, I faced some conflicts (just unit tests though) in Zed due to the tag being very old. I pinged the horizon PTL and he updated the hash for the next tag. Apparently we could have a new zed point release very soon [1]. I am attaching all debdiffs either way. [1]

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-02-29 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
Fix has merged in Caracal/Noble cycle, has been backported upstream to Bobcat, Antelope and Zed. It needs to have SRU'ed back to Ussuri. Bobcat, Antelope and Zed could have Point Releases (as long as there one new tag upstream), but for Yoga, Xena, Wallaby, Victoria and Ussuri it will necessary

[Bug 1904580] Re: Permissions 0644 for '/var/lib/nova/.ssh/id_rsa' are too open

2022-05-06 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Rodrigo Barbieri (rodrigo-barbieri2010) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904580 Title: Permissions 0644 for '/var/lib/n

[Bug 1948914] Re: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases

2021-11-24 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Tags removed: verification-ussuri-needed ** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948914 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1939604] Re: [SRU] Cannot create 1vcpu instance with multiqueue image, vif_type=tap (calico)

2021-09-09 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cloud-archive Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1893263] Re: [SRU] Cannot create instance with multiqueue image and vif_type=tap (calico)

2021-03-10 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Attachment added: "1893263_stein_validation.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1893263/+attachment/5475444/+files/1893263_stein_validation.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1893263] Re: [SRU] Cannot create instance with multiqueue image and vif_type=tap (calico)

2021-03-10 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Attachment added: "1893263_train_validation.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1893263/+attachment/5475443/+files/1893263_train_validation.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1893263] Re: [SRU] Cannot create instance with multiqueue image and vif_type=tap (calico)

2021-03-10 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Attachment added: "1893263_focal_ussuri_validation.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1893263/+attachment/5475442/+files/1893263_focal_ussuri_validation.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1893263] Re: [SRU] Cannot create instance with multiqueue image and vif_type=tap (calico)

2021-03-10 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
[0] has been fixed through PRs [1] and [2], and master packages built for focal are available at [3]. I tested them on a new focal-ussuri deployment, therefore already having the fix from the point release [4], and it works. Attaching validation for focal-ussuri, and previous validations for

[Bug 1906271] Re: [SRU] November Stable Point Updates

2020-12-15 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906271 Title: [SRU] November Stable Point Updates To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1893263] Re: [SRU] Cannot create instance with multiqueue image and vif_type=tap (calico)

2020-11-25 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
Slightly more context on my previous comment: When I said " was able to fix the issue I was having by forcing the hostname in /etc/felix/felix.cfg using the property" I was referring to a problem I was having setting up the environment to validate the SRU, not the main issue itself. -- You

[Bug 1893263] Re: [SRU] Cannot create instance with multiqueue image and vif_type=tap (calico)

2020-11-24 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
I was able to fix the issue I was having by forcing the hostname in /etc/felix/felix.cfg using the property: FelixHostname = I've successfully validated bionic-stein and bionic-train, however, I cannot install the calico packages on focal: root@juju-3294b7-calico-ussuri-6:/home/ubuntu#

[Bug 1893263] Re: [SRU] Cannot create instance with multiqueue image and vif_type=tap (calico)

2020-10-28 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Tags added: sts-sru-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893263 Title: [SRU] Cannot create instance with multiqueue image and vif_type=tap (calico) To manage notifications

[Bug 1893263] Re: [SRU] Cannot create instance with multiqueue image and vif_type=tap (calico)

2020-10-28 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Summary changed: - Cannot create instance with multiqueue image and vif_type=tap (calico) + [SRU] Cannot create instance with multiqueue image and vif_type=tap (calico) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1893263] Re: Cannot create instance with multiqueue image and vif_type=tap (calico)

2020-10-27 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
debdiff for SRU bionic-train ** Patch added: "bionic-train.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1893263/+attachment/5428145/+files/bionic-train.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1893263] Re: Cannot create instance with multiqueue image and vif_type=tap (calico)

2020-10-27 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
debdiff for SRU bionic-stein ** Patch added: "bionic-stein.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1893263/+attachment/5428146/+files/bionic-stein.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1893263] Re: Cannot create instance with multiqueue image and vif_type=tap (calico)

2020-10-27 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
debdiff for SRU focal-ussuri ** Description changed: When using calico, the vif_type is tap, therefore when the instance is being created, the method plug_tap() is invoked, which creates the tap device prior to launching the instance. That tap device is currently always created

[Bug 1869746] Re: Cinder throws error creating incremental backup from parent in another project

2020-07-24 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Description changed: Environment: Ubuntu Bionic, OpenStack Train, Volume and Backup Driver Ceph This bug was also reproduced on Queens. Steps to reproduce: 1) Create a volume v1 as user demo 2) Create a full backup of v1 as user admin 3) Create an incremental backup of

[Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount

2020-06-28 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
After speaking to Robie and the customer, we will not be pursuing the SRU further back to eoan and bionic at this moment. Changing those to "Won't Fix". ** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Eoan) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix ** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Bionic) Status:

[Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount

2020-06-16 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Attachment added: "validation_nfs_utils_focal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1871214/+attachment/5384559/+files/validation_nfs_utils_focal.txt ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done

[Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount

2020-06-16 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
Performed validation according to test case, attached output, updated tags -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871214 Title: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount To

[Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount

2020-06-16 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Description changed: Reproduced in Bionic and Focal, packages 1:1.3.4-2.1ubuntu5.2 and 1:1.3.4-2.5ubuntu3 respectively. Steps to reproduce: 1) Set up a ISCSI client to a 1GB+ volume, mount it in /data and set fstab to mount at boot 2) Create a folder in /data like /data/dir1

[Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount

2020-06-10 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
Hello Robie, While I investigated this issue, I found workarounds #1 and #2 as you can see in the description section. I also found the upstream fix which is the proper implementation of workaround #2 (workaround #2 per se wouldn't be backportable, hence it needs a "generator" to be dynamic). I

[Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount

2020-04-29 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
debdiff for groovy ** Patch added: "lp1871214_groovy.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1871214/+attachment/5363650/+files/lp1871214_groovy.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount

2020-04-29 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Also affects: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Rodrigo Barbieri (rodrigo-barbieri2010) Status: Fix Committed ** Attachment removed: "lp1871214_focal.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1871214/+attachment/5363

[Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount

2020-04-29 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
debdiff for focal ** Also affects: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Eoan) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in:

[Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount

2020-04-28 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Description changed: Reproduced in Bionic and Focal, packages 1:1.3.4-2.1ubuntu5.2 and 1:1.3.4-2.5ubuntu3 respectively. Steps to reproduce: 1) Set up a ISCSI client to a 1GB+ volume, mount it in /data and set fstab to mount at boot 2) Create a folder in /data like /data/dir1

[Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount

2020-04-27 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
This problem is addressed by commit [0] which requires [1] to compile. I have created a test package with those changes and confirmed the issue is addressed. [0] http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=steved/nfs- utils.git;a=commitdiff;h=4776bd0599420f9d073c9e2601ed438062dccd19 [1]

[Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount

2020-04-27 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Summary changed: - nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount + [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount ** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Rodrigo Barbieri (rodrigo-barbieri2010) ** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New =&g

[Bug 1871214] Re: nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount

2020-04-15 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871214 Title: nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1871214] Re: nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount

2020-04-06 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Description changed: Reproduced in Bionic and Focal, packages 1:1.3.4-2.1ubuntu5.2 and 1:1.3.4-2.5ubuntu3 respectively. Steps to reproduce: - 1) Set up a ISCSI client to a 1GB+ volume, mount it /data and set fstab to mount at boot + 1) Set up a ISCSI client to a 1GB+ volume, mount

[Bug 1871214] [NEW] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount

2020-04-06 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
Public bug reported: Reproduced in Bionic and Focal, packages 1:1.3.4-2.1ubuntu5.2 and 1:1.3.4-2.5ubuntu3 respectively. Steps to reproduce: 1) Set up a ISCSI client to a 1GB+ volume, mount it in /data and set fstab to mount at boot 2) Create a folder in /data like /data/dir1 and set up

[Bug 1766126] Re: exportfs always returns success status

2020-04-06 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
This is no longer true as of 1:1.3.4-2.1ubuntu5.2 (bionic). Do you need this fix in xenial? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766126 Title: exportfs always returns success status To

[Bug 1840465] Re: [SRU] Fails to list security groups if one or more exists without rules

2019-11-28 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
verified on disco-stein ** Tags removed: verification-needed-disco ** Tags added: verification-done-disco -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1840465 Title: [SRU] Fails to list security

[Bug 1840465] Re: [SRU] Fails to list security groups if one or more exists without rules

2019-11-27 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
verified on bionic-queens ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic verification-queens-needed ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic verification-queens-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1840465] Re: [SRU] Fails to list security groups if one or more exists without rules

2019-11-14 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
Since the system behaves as expected with the updated package installed, passing the test case, I will mark it as verified. ** Tags removed: verification-rocky-needed ** Tags added: verification-rocky-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1840465] Re: [SRU] Fails to list security groups if one or more exists without rules

2019-11-13 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
I tried to reproduce again in a different deployment unsuccessfully. I don't know how (and if) it differs from the previous instance I was able to reproduce it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1840465] Re: [SRU] Fails to list security groups if one or more exists without rules

2019-11-12 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
While performing validation, I was unable to reproduce the issue in bionic-rocky deployment. Inspecting the code, the fix was not present. I added logging, and confirmed that neutron is now including the key "security_group_rules" in the response, therefore the error is no longer triggered. I

[Bug 1840465] Re: [SRU] Fails to list security groups if one or more exists without rules

2019-10-21 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Tags added: sts-sru-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1840465 Title: [SRU] Fails to list security groups if one or more exists without rules To manage notifications about

[Bug 1840465] Re: [SRU] Fails to list security groups if one or more exists without rules

2019-10-19 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Disco) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Eoan) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1840465] Re: [SRU] Fails to list security groups if one or more exists without rules

2019-10-19 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
Attached debdiffs for disco, cosmic and bionic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1840465 Title: [SRU] Fails to list security groups if one or more exists without rules To manage

[Bug 1840465] Re: [SRU] Fails to list security groups if one or more exists without rules

2019-10-19 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Patch added: "lp1840465_bionic.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/horizon/+bug/1840465/+attachment/5298453/+files/lp1840465_bionic.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1840465] Re: [SRU] Fails to list security groups if one or more exists without rules

2019-10-19 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Patch added: "lp1840465_cosmic.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/horizon/+bug/1840465/+attachment/5298452/+files/lp1840465_cosmic.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1840465] Re: [SRU] Fails to list security groups if one or more exists without rules

2019-10-19 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Description changed: Horizon 14.0.2 (rocky) If a security group without any rules exists the listing of security groups fails with a KeyError. Traceback (most recent call last): - File "/usr/share/openstack-dashboard/openstack_dashboard/api/rest/utils.py", line 127, in _wrapped -

[Bug 1840465] Re: [SRU] Fails to list security groups if one or more exists without rules

2019-10-19 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Summary changed: - Fails to list security groups if one or more exists without rules + [SRU] Fails to list security groups if one or more exists without rules -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1821594] Re: [SRU] Error in confirm_migration leaves stale allocations and 'confirming' migration state

2019-07-11 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
Xenial Queens verified using [Test Case]. Attached output. ** Attachment added: "xenial-queens-validation.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1821594/+attachment/5276539/+files/xenial-queens-validation.txt ** Tags removed: verification-queens-needed ** Tags added:

[Bug 1821594] Re: [SRU] Error in confirm_migration leaves stale allocations and 'confirming' migration state

2019-07-05 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Attachment added: "bionic-queens-validation.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1821594/+attachment/5275280/+files/bionic-queens-validation.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1821594] Re: [SRU] Error in confirm_migration leaves stale allocations and 'confirming' migration state

2019-07-05 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
Bionic Queens verified using [Test Case]. Attached output above ^. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1821594] Re: [SRU] Error in confirm_migration leaves stale allocations and 'confirming' migration state

2019-07-01 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Tags removed: verification-rocky-needed ** Tags added: verification-rocky-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1821594] Re: [SRU] Error in confirm_migration leaves stale allocations and 'confirming' migration state

2019-07-01 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Tags removed: verification-needed-cosmic ** Tags added: verification-done-cosmic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821594 Title: [SRU] Error in confirm_migration leaves stale

[Bug 1821594] Re: [SRU] Error in confirm_migration leaves stale allocations and 'confirming' migration state

2019-06-26 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
Bionic Rocky verified using [Test Case]. Attached output. ** Attachment added: "bionic-rocky-validation.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1821594/+attachment/5273646/+files/bionic-rocky-validation.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1821594] Re: [SRU] Error in confirm_migration leaves stale allocations and 'confirming' migration state

2019-06-26 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
Cosmic Rocky verified using [Test Case]. Attached output. ** Attachment added: "cosmic-rocky-validation.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1821594/+attachment/5273645/+files/cosmic-rocky-validation.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1821594] Re: [SRU] Error in confirm_migration leaves stale allocations and 'confirming' migration state

2019-06-26 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
Improved test case with more detailed steps in order to make it easier to script and validate the output ** Description changed: Description: When performing a cold migration, if an exception is raised by the driver during confirm_migration (this runs in the source node), the

[Bug 1821594] Re: Error in confirm_migration leaves stale allocations and 'confirming' migration state

2019-06-12 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
** Description changed: Description: When performing a cold migration, if an exception is raised by the driver during confirm_migration (this runs in the source node), the migration record is stuck in "confirming" state and the allocations against the source node are not removed.