[Bug 1870736] Re: [nvidia] Screen scaling 125% gives 200%
The working around is working adequately for me:
Jul 02 08:50:59 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Enabling experimental feature
'x11-randr-fractional-scaling'
Jul 02 08:50:59 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Crtc at 0.00x2160.00 size
1920.00x1080.00 (@ 2.00 - adapted 2.00) considering it of
3840.00x2160.00
Jul 02 08:50:59 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Crtc at 0.00x0.00 size
1920.00x1080.00 (@ 2.00 - adapted 2.00) considering it of
3840.00x2160.00
Jul 02 08:50:59 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Setting screen size 3840x4320
Jul 02 08:50:59 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Setting screen size to 3840x4320
Jul 02 08:50:59 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Scaling at 1.00 (transformation
matrix is 65536 = 1.00) using filter fast
Jul 02 08:50:59 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Configuring CRTC 504 with mode 509
(3840 x 2160 @ 59.999294) at position 0, 2160 and transform 0
Jul 02 08:50:59 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Setting UBUNTU crtc config crtc 504,
timestamp 0 (config timestamp 158041), x: 0, y: 2160, mode: 509, rotation 1,
n_outputs 1: RETURN reply 0x56264b3d7970, error: (nil)
Jul 02 08:50:59 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Scaling at 1.00 (transformation
matrix is 65536 = 1.00) using filter fast
Jul 02 08:50:59 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Configuring CRTC 441 with mode 448
(3840 x 2160 @ 60.00) at position 0, 0 and transform 0
Jul 02 08:50:59 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Setting UBUNTU crtc config crtc 441,
timestamp 0 (config timestamp 158041), x: 0, y: 0, mode: 448, rotation 1,
n_outputs 1: RETURN reply 0x56264b3d7970, error: (nil)
Jul 02 08:51:00 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Unset XDG_SESSION_ID,
getCurrentSessionProxy() called outside a user session. Asking logind directly.
Jul 02 08:51:00 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Will monitor session 2
Jul 02 08:51:00 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Telepathy is not available, chat
integration will be disabled.
Jul 02 08:51:00 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Setting screen size 3840x4320
Jul 02 08:51:00 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Setting screen size 3840x4320
Jul 02 08:51:00 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Setting screen size 3840x4320
Jul 02 08:51:00 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Setting screen size 3840x4320
Jul 02 08:51:00 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Error looking up permission:
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.portal.Error.NotFound: No entry for geolocation
Jul 02 08:51:02 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: GNOME Shell started at Thu Jul 02
2020 08:51:00 GMT-0400 (EDT)
Jul 02 08:51:02 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Registering session with GDM
Jul 02 08:52:08 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: polkitAuthenticationAgent: Received
2identities that can be used for authentication. Only considering one.
Jul 02 08:52:23 lenny gnome-shell[17639]:
../clutter/clutter/clutter-actor.c:10556: The clutter_actor_set_allocation()
function can only be called from within the implementation of the
ClutterActor::allocate() virtual function.
Jul 02 08:52:28 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: GOt configuration change [(0, 2160,
1.0, uint32 0, false, [('eDP-1-1', '3840x2160@59.999294281005859',
{'underscanning': })]), (0, 0, 2.0, 0, true, [('HDMI-0', '3840x2160@60',
{'underscanning': })])]
Jul 02 08:52:29 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: GOt configuration change [(0, 2160,
1.0, uint32 0, false, [('eDP-1-1', '3840x2160@59.999294281005859',
{'underscanning': })]), (0, 0, 2.0, 0, true, [('HDMI-0', '3840x2160@60',
{'underscanning': })])]
Jul 02 08:52:29 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: GOt configuration change [(0, 2160,
1.0, uint32 0, false, [('eDP-1-1', '3840x2160@59.999294281005859',
{'underscanning': })]), (0, 0, 2.0, 0, true, [('HDMI-0', '3840x2160@60',
{'underscanning': })])]
Jul 02 08:52:30 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: GOt configuration change [(0, 2160,
1.0, uint32 0, false, [('eDP-1-1', '3840x2160@59.999294281005859',
{'underscanning': })]), (0, 0, 1.0, 0, true, [('HDMI-0', '3840x2160@60',
{'underscanning': })])]
Jul 02 08:52:32 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: GOt configuration change [(0, 2160,
1.0, uint32 0, false, [('eDP-1-1', '3840x2160@59.999294281005859',
{'underscanning': })]), (0, 0, 1.0, 0, true, [('HDMI-0', '3840x2160@60',
{'underscanning': })])]
Jul 02 08:52:32 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: Setting screen size 3840x4320
Jul 02 08:53:36 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: GOt configuration change [(0, 2880,
1.0, uint32 0, false, [('eDP-1-1', '3840x2160@59.999294281005859',
{'underscanning': })]), (0, 0, 1.5, 0, true, [('HDMI-0', '3840x2160@60',
{'underscanning': })])]
Jul 02 08:53:36 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: GOt configuration change [(0, 2880,
1.0, uint32 0, false, [('eDP-1-1', '3840x2160@59.999294281005859',
{'underscanning': })]), (0, 0, 1.5, 0, true, [('HDMI-0', '3840x2160@60',
{'underscanning': })])]
Jul 02 08:53:36 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: GOt configuration change [(0, 2880,
1.0, uint32 0, false, [('eDP-1-1', '3840x2160@59.999294281005859',
{'underscanning': })]), (0, 0, 1.5, 0, true, [('HDMI-0', '3840x2160@60',
{'underscanning': })])]
Jul 02 08:53:38 lenny gnome-shell[17639]: GOt
[Bug 932663] Re: kernel upgrade failed on a USB live system created by usb-creator
I'm not sure why this says Fix Released - it is still happening for me on a 12.10 Live USB + persistence set up. In fact, I got it trying to apt-get install mdadm - so it seems possible it occurs any time update-initramfs runs rather than just on a kernel update. I suppose it is possible that if you can get the first update done using Colin Watson's workaround that future updates will work, but install from the 12.10 release Desktop iso doesn't. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932663 Title: kernel upgrade failed on a USB live system created by usb-creator To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/932663/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1078224] [NEW] apt-cacher-ng does not allow .o files to be downloaded
Public bug reported: If you try to install a package that downloads a '.o' file, e.g. a binary firmware for a wireless card, via apt-cacher-ng it fails because the .o extension is not allowed: sudo apt-get install firmware-b43legacy-installer b43-fwcutter ... ERROR 403: Forbidden file type or location: http://downloads.openwrt.org/sources/wl_apsta-3.130.20.0.o. The solution, as reported in #227240, is to edit /etc/apt-cacher- ng/acng.conf and uncomment the PfilePattern setting and update part of the regular expression for extentions (|\.jigdo|\.template, etc.) to include |\.o ** Affects: apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078224 Title: apt-cacher-ng does not allow .o files to be downloaded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-cacher-ng/+bug/1078224/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1078224] Re: apt-cacher-ng does not allow .o files to be downloaded
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected precise ** Description changed: If you try to install a package that downloads a '.o' file, e.g. a binary firmware for a wireless card, via apt-cacher-ng it fails because the .o extension is not allowed: sudo apt-get install firmware-b43legacy-installer b43-fwcutter ... ERROR 403: Forbidden file type or location: http://downloads.openwrt.org/sources/wl_apsta-3.130.20.0.o. - The solution, as reported in #227240, is to edit /etc/apt-cacher- - ng/acng.conf and uncomment the PfilePattern setting and update part of - the regular expression for extentions (|\.jigdo|\.template, etc.) to - include |\.o + The solution, as reported in #227240, is to edit /etc/apt-cacher-ng/acng.conf and uncomment the PfilePattern setting and update part of the regular expression for extentions (|\.jigdo|\.template, etc.) to include |\.o + --- + ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu1 + Architecture: amd64 + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 + InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 (20120130) + Package: apt-cacher-ng 0.7.2-1ubuntu1 + PackageArchitecture: amd64 + ProcEnviron: + TERM=xterm + LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 + LANGUAGE=en_GB:en + SHELL=/bin/bash + PATH=(custom, no user) + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-22.35-generic 3.2.14 + Tags: precise + Uname: Linux 3.2.0-22-generic x86_64 + UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) + UserGroups: + + modified.conffile..etc.apt.cacher.ng.acng.conf: [modified] + modified.conffile..etc.apt.cacher.ng.backends.ubuntu: [modified] + modified.conffile..etc.apt.cacher.ng.security.conf: [modified] + mtime.conffile..etc.apt.cacher.ng.acng.conf: 2012-11-13T15:41:58.088162 + mtime.conffile..etc.apt.cacher.ng.backends.ubuntu: 2012-05-28T12:04:25.573032 + mtime.conffile..etc.apt.cacher.ng.security.conf: 2012-08-14T09:21:47.307735 ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078224/+attachment/3431976/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078224 Title: apt-cacher-ng does not allow .o files to be downloaded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-cacher-ng/+bug/1078224/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 477430] Re: grub 2 error: out of disk. failed to boot default entries. press any key to continue...
I have this problem with an old machine where the BIOS does not recognize the full size of the hard disk. The machine is a Dell Inspiron 6000 laptop and the BIOS recognizes the disk as 137GB even though it is really 250GB. Grub2 won't boot off a partition that goes beyond where the BIOS sees the end of the disk, which is how Ubuntu is installed by default (with a single large partition). I can work around the problem by using manual partitioning during the installation and making sure that /boot is on a partition that is in the first 137GB of the drive - in my case I created a separate 1GB partition at /dev/sda1 and mounted it as /boot. My source of inspiration was http://www.dudek.org/blog/220 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477430 Title: grub 2 error: out of disk. failed to boot default entries. press any key to continue... To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/477430/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 952063] Re: Cannot boot server using mdadm RAID1 after creating LVM snapshot
When it boots it pauses for a long time trying to mount the root volume and then the screen shows udevd[119]: 'watershed sh -c '/sbin/lvm vgscan; sbin/lvm vgchange -ay'' [264] terminated by signal 9 (Killed) device-mapper: table: 252:8: snapshot: Snapshot cow pairing for exception table handover failed The logical volumes all seem to work correctly after you boot into a livecd - i.e. I can assemble the raid arrays, enable the volume groups and then mount the logical volumes - at least the ones that contain actual filesystems - the ones that contain vms I haven't done anything with. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/952063 Title: Cannot boot server using mdadm RAID1 after creating LVM snapshot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+bug/952063/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 952063] Re: Cannot boot server using mdadm RAID1 after creating LVM snapshot
I can install ubuntu-libvirt-host in the USB livecd and then run the virtual machines, so all the LVM volume groups seem to be intact. I don't seem to have any broken volume groups, but does the fact that the boot process is attempting vgchange -ay mean that the boot will fail if any of the LVM volume groups cannot be started, even if the broken one is not needed to start the system? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/952063 Title: Cannot boot server using mdadm RAID1 after creating LVM snapshot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+bug/952063/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 952063] [NEW] Cannot boot server using mdadm RAID1 after creating LVM snapshot
Public bug reported: I'm running a test server on Precise to act as a KVM host. The virtual machines are using LVM logical volumes as backing stores. I have created several virtual machines by taking an LVM snapshot of a base image. When I rebooted the server, it no longer boots. After switching grub to use the console I get messages similar to the ones reported here: http://www.redhat.com/archives/linux- lvm/2012-February/msg00032.html - i.e. Snapshot cow pairing for exception table handover failed The server has 2 2TB SATA drives - partitioned into a smallish sdX1 and a large sdX5. sda1/sdb1 make a mdadm RAID 1 array md0, sda2/sdb2 make md0. Both md devices are clean. md0 contains vgSystem with logical volumes for root, boot and swap. md1 contains vgVMs with logical volumes for all the virtual machines. I can boot the server of a USB stick and then assemble the md arrays and enable the volume groups and everything seems intact ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: grub-pc 1.99-17ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.28-generic 3.2.9 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Mar 11 11:16:44 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 (20120130) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: grub2 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/952063 Title: Cannot boot server using mdadm RAID1 after creating LVM snapshot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/952063/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 952063] Re: Cannot boot server using mdadm RAID1 after creating LVM snapshot
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/952063 Title: Cannot boot server using mdadm RAID1 after creating LVM snapshot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/952063/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 952063] Re: Cannot boot server using mdadm RAID1 after creating LVM snapshot
** Description changed: I'm running a test server on Precise to act as a KVM host. The virtual machines are using LVM logical volumes as backing stores. I have created several virtual machines by taking an LVM snapshot of a base image. When I rebooted the server, it no longer boots. After switching grub to use the console I get messages similar to the ones reported here: http://www.redhat.com/archives/linux- lvm/2012-February/msg00032.html - i.e. Snapshot cow pairing for exception table handover failed The server has 2 2TB SATA drives - partitioned into a smallish sdX1 and a large sdX5. sda1/sdb1 make a mdadm RAID 1 array md0, sda2/sdb2 make - md0. Both md devices are clean. md0 contains vgSystem with logical + md1. Both md devices are clean. md0 contains vgSystem with logical volumes for root, boot and swap. md1 contains vgVMs with logical volumes for all the virtual machines. I can boot the server of a USB stick and then assemble the md arrays and enable the volume groups and everything seems intact ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: grub-pc 1.99-17ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.28-generic 3.2.9 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Mar 11 11:16:44 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 (20120130) ProcEnviron: - TERM=xterm - PATH=(custom, no user) - LANG=en_US.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + TERM=xterm + PATH=(custom, no user) + LANG=en_US.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: grub2 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/952063 Title: Cannot boot server using mdadm RAID1 after creating LVM snapshot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/952063/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 832465] Re: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha17~git20110807.dfsg1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
If you do : apt-cache show samba4-common-bin You get: Package: samba4-common-bin Priority: optional Section: universe/net Installed-Size: 80 Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com Original-Maintainer: Samba Debian Maintainers pkg-samba-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org Architecture: i386 Source: samba4 Version: 4.0.0~alpha17~git20110807.dfsg1-1ubuntu1 Replaces: samba4-common ( 2:3.4.0~pre2-1) Depends: python-samba (= 4.0.0~alpha17~git20110807.dfsg1-1ubuntu1), samba-common (= 2:3.4.0~pre2-1), python Conflicts: samba ( 2:3.3.0~rc2-5), samba-common ( 2:3.3.0~rc2-5) I.e. samba4-common-bin depends on a recent version of samba-common, which is why both samba and samba4 components get installed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832465 Title: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha17~git20110807.dfsg1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/832465/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 887537] [NEW] samba4-common-bin does not include libkdc-policy.so
Public bug reported: If you install package samba4-common-bin by itself (to work around bug #832465) and then run samba-tool testparm You get Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/sbin/samba-tool, line 25, in module from samba import netcmd File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/samba/netcmd/__init__.py, line 196, in module from samba.netcmd.time import cmd_time File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/samba/netcmd/time.py, line 23, in module import common File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/samba/netcmd/common.py, line 22, in module from samba.net import Net ImportError: libkdc-policy.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Doing dpkg-query --search libkdc-policy.so in an installation with the samba4 package shows samba4: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/samba/libkdc-policy.so but I think the file should be in samba4-common-bin rather than samba4, so that you can run testparm to check the format of smb.conf prior to installing samba4 Additional info DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 NonfreeKernelModules: veth pci_stub vboxpci vboxnetadp vboxnetflt vboxdrv i8k ip6table_filter ip6_tables ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_state nf_conntrack ipt_REJECT xt_CHECKSUM iptable_mangle xt_tcpudp iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables parport_pc ppdev dm_crypt nfsd nfs lockd fscache auth_rpcgss nfs_acl sunrpc bridge stp r8169 joydev btusb bluetooth dell_laptop pcmcia dcdbas ipw2200 libipw snd_intel8x0 psmouse snd_ac97_codec cfg80211 ac97_bus serio_raw snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore yenta_socket pcmcia_rsrc snd_page_alloc lib80211 pcmcia_core lp parport firewire_sbp2 radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm firewire_ohci b44 ssb firewire_core crc_itu_t sdhci_pci sdhci i2c_algo_bit video Package: samba4-common-bin 4.0.0~alpha17~git20110807.dfsg1-1ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProblemType: Bug ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4 SourcePackage: samba4 Tags: oneiric Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic i686 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: samba4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887537 Title: samba4-common-bin does not include libkdc-policy.so To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/887537/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 832465] Re: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha17~git20110807.dfsg1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
One problem seems to be the samba4 postinst script is getting some values (realm, domain, netbios name, server role) from samba-common, and samba-common doesnt seem to use the values in smb.conf, particularly for domain. My workaround is to sudo apt-get install samba4-common-bin then create replace the smb.conf file with a samba4 one, e.g. generated from a working samba4 installation, such as: # Global parameters [global] server role = domain controller workgroup = EXAMPLE realm = example.com netbios name = SERVER [netlogon] path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol/example.com/scripts read only = No [sysvol] path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol read only = No Then run sudo /var/lib/dpkg/info/samba-common.config If you don't do the step above, then when samba4 installs, the postinst script attempts to provision the server, but debconf returns the domain as WORKGROUP instead of EXAMPLE and the provision fails - I don't know if this means the bug is in samba-common rather than samba4? Then run sudo apt-get install samba4 and it should all work correctly -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832465 Title: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha17~git20110807.dfsg1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/832465/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665692] Re: wont connect to msn
Actually, my 10.04 is now working, so the bug is not open, at least as far as I am concerned. -- wont connect to msn https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665692 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665692] Re: wont connect to msn
I don't think this is invalid or fixed - I am having this problem with a fully up-to-date 10.04 LTS empathy: Installed: 2.30.2-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.30.2-0ubuntu1 ** Tags added: lucid -- wont connect to msn https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665692 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 611715] Re: mii-tool not working with e1000e nic driver
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #491358 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491358 ** Also affects: net-tools (Fedora) via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491358 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- mii-tool not working with e1000e nic driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 527458] Re: please include status messages/tooltips
I would like to add my voice to those asking for the previous behaviour to be reinstated. I can see the place for less is more in terms of removing screen clutter and user interactions that do not add value. Tooltips that tell you what something does seem to be a candidate for this and the argument for self-explanatory icons is strong. However, as a previous comment says, there are very few universally understood icons, and something that is an obvious icon to me might not be in another culture. Given that the clutter only appears at the users request, I would rather have a few redundant tooltips than have a group of users unsure what an icon is for and with no easy way to find out. I think that where tooltips are actually providing status information rather than what am I the case for reinstating them is even stronger. The ability to check on the status of some aspect of the system without focusing away from the current application is an important interaction for many users. In my case, like many others, it is minutes of battery life remaining. If we can find a better way to provide this information, without requiring more clicks or changes of application focus then great, but please can we wait until we have found a better solution before removing the 90% solution we already have. Finally, doing this in a LTS seems a high-risk strategy to me. I can see that we don't want the LTS to be stuck with an obsolete user interface paradigm and that increases the pressure to introduce some things that might have benefited from being introduced in Lucid+1 (where they could be dropped in Lucid+2 if they don't work out). However, I am also worried that if we introduce things in an LTS then there will be a great deal of reluctance to go back to the old way even if the new way doesn't work out. -- please include status messages/tooltips https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527458 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 401657] [NEW] There is no Paste Unformatted or Paste Special in Evolution
Public bug reported: It is incredibly inconvenient when you want to copy text from a web browser and paste it into an HTML-formatted email. Unless you run glipper or an alternative (all of which have problems, e.g. with the Gimp), then you need to start a text editor, paste into that and then recopy the text and then paste it into the Evolution compose window. This bug already exists upstream as http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302941 I think this should be a candidate for 100 Paper Cuts ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- There is no Paste Unformatted or Paste Special in Evolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401657 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 401657] Re: There is no Paste Unformatted or Paste Special in Evolution
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #302941 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302941 ** Also affects: evolution via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302941 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Also affects: hundredpapercuts Importance: Undecided Status: New -- There is no Paste Unformatted or Paste Special in Evolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401657 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 304889] Re: Does not use system proxy settings
Same for me on Jaunty as of June 16, 2009. I think this bug should be considered a show stopper for making Empathy the default IM client in Karmic. -- Does not use system proxy settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304889 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 287259] Re: [Intrepid] VMware Server Console failed to start
** Tags added: jaunty -- [Intrepid] VMware Server Console failed to start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287259 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332833] Re: pam_mount(pam_mount.c:100): unknown pam_mount option use_first_pass
I have the same issue, Jaunty Beta on AMD64 -- pam_mount(pam_mount.c:100): unknown pam_mount option use_first_pass https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332833 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352391] Re: AppArmor prevents DHCP from getting address
Yes I have installed likewise-open5 and left a domain (and then rejoined the domain). This does seem to be a duplicate of bug 354498. My /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/nameservice is attached. ** Attachment added: /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/nameservice http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24923021/nameservice -- AppArmor prevents DHCP from getting address https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352391 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dhcp3 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 352391] Re: AppArmor prevents DHCP from getting address
Yes I have installed likewise-open5 and left a domain (and then rejoined the domain). This does seem to be a duplicate of bug 354498. My /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/nameservice is attached. ** Attachment added: /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/nameservice http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24923021/nameservice -- AppArmor prevents DHCP from getting address https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352391 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348126] Re: ssh are using ssh-userauth but ignores private key
I have a system running Jaunty Beta AMD64 with ssh 1:5.1p1-5ubuntu1. I have two private keys, both of which are valid in a number of remote servers. If I copy one of the keys to ~/.ssh/id_rsa everything works correctly. If I copy the other key to ~/.ssh/id_rsa it does not work within gnome using seahorse and ssh-agent, but it does work from a non- Gnome session. Both keys work correctly in Intrepid. Both keys were originally generated using PuttyGen on Windows. Looking at the trace at the end of this response, does seahorse have an issue if the key is only 1023 bits instead of 1024? It works from a non-Gnome session: Ctrl-Alt-F2 Login using Username/Password, $ ssh server.example.com Enter passphrase for key /home/user/.ssh/id_rsa Connects correctly. But it doesn't work within Gnome: Start Gnome Terminal $ ssh server.example.com Gnome dialog box pops up asking for passphrase Permission denied (publickey,gssapi-with-mic). $ ssh -vvv server.example.com snip debug1: Offering public key: /home/user/.ssh/id_rsa debug3: send_pubkey_test debug2: we sent a publickey packet, wait for reply debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg ssh-rsa blen 148 debug2: input_userauth_pk_ok: fp ed:snip debug3: sign_and_send_pubkey debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,gssapi-with-mic debug1: Trying private key: /home/user/.ssh/identity debug3: no such identity: /home/user/.ssh/identity debug1: Trying private key: /home/user/.ssh/id_dsa debug3: no such identity: /home/user/.ssh/id_dsa debug2: we did not send a packet, disable method debug1: No more authentication methods to try. Permission denied (publickey,gssapi-with-mic). For comparison, using the same key in the terminal session (i.e. no ssh-agent, no seahorse): debug1: Offering public key: /home/user/.ssh/id_rsa debug3: send_pubkey_test debug2: we sent a publickey packet, wait for reply debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg ssh-rsa blen 148 debug2: input_userauth_pk_ok: fp ed:snip debug3: sign_and_send_pubkey debug1: PEM_read_PrivateKey failed debug1: read PEM private key done: type unknown Enter passphrase for key '/home/user/.ssh/id_rsa': debug1: read PEM private key done: type RSA debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey). Also, using the same key in the terminal session but using ssh-agent (still no seahorse): $ eval `ssh-agent` Agent pid 25343 $ trap kill $SSH_AGENT_PID 0 $ ssh-add ~/.ssh/id_rsa Enter passphrase for /home/user/.ssh/id_rsa: Identity added: /home/user/.ssh/id_rsa (/home/user/.ssh/id_rsa) $ ssh -vvv server.example.com snip debug1: Offering public key: /home/user/.ssh/id_rsa debug3: send_pubkey_test debug2: we sent a publickey packet, wait for reply debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg ssh-rsa blen 148 debug2: input_userauth_pk_ok: fp ed:snip debug3: sign_and_send_pubkey debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey). Finally, using the good key that works inside Gnome: In Gnome, start Gnome Terminal $ ssh -vvv server.example.com snip debug1: Offering public key: /home/user/.ssh/id_rsa debug3: send_pubkey_test debug2: we sent a publickey packet, wait for reply debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg ssh-rsa blen 149 debug2: input_userauth_pk_ok: fp snip debug3: sign_and_send_pubkey debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey). I captured the full trace for a Gnome login using the good key and the bad key and did a diff: $ diff good.txt bad.txt 35,36c35,36 debug1: Checking blacklist file /usr/share/ssh/blacklist.RSA-1024 debug1: Checking blacklist file /etc/ssh/blacklist.RSA-1024 --- debug1: Checking blacklist file /usr/share/ssh/blacklist.RSA-1023 debug1: Checking blacklist file /etc/ssh/blacklist.RSA-1023 75,76c75,76 debug2: dh_gen_key: priv key bits set: 123/256 debug2: bits set: 506/1024 --- debug2: dh_gen_key: priv key bits set: 116/256 debug2: bits set: 518/1024 85c85 debug2: bits set: 485/1024 --- debug2: bits set: 525/1024 96c96 debug2: key: /home/user/.ssh/id_rsa (snip) --- debug2: key: /home/user/.ssh/id_rsa (snip) 123,124c123,124 debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg ssh-rsa blen 149 debug2: input_userauth_pk_ok: fp ed:snip --- debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg ssh-rsa blen 148 debug2: input_userauth_pk_ok: fp ed:snip 126c126,133 debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey). --- debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,gssapi-with-mic -- ssh are using ssh-userauth but ignores private key https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348126] Re: ssh are using ssh-userauth but ignores private key
@rancor Can you try your key that doesn't work using ssh-agent in a non-Gnome session, either by switching to a different TTY or by ssh'ing into the Jaunty box from elsewhere (without Agent Forwarding: ssh -a ...)? It might be that the problem is with seahorse rather than openssh- client, given my key works outside Gnome but not inside it, regardless of whether I use ssh-agent or ssh -i Roger -- ssh are using ssh-userauth but ignores private key https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348126] Re: ssh are using ssh-userauth but ignores private key
Reading https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome- keyring/+bug/339097 it looks like gnome-keyring is acting as the ssh- agent, so maybe the problem is with that rather than seahorse. Roger -- ssh are using ssh-userauth but ignores private key https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352391] [NEW] AppArmor prevents DHCP from getting address
Public bug reported: I am running Jaunty Beta on AMD64, I have dhcp3 (3.1.1-5ubuntu7) installed. Network Manager shows the constant spinning icon, and never gets an IP address. My /var/log/messages has: Mar 31 15:54:51 hostname kernel: [ 23.264536] type=1503 audit(1238504091.637:14): operation=socket_create family=inet sock_type=dgram protocol=17 pid=3269 profile=/sbin/dhclient3 This is sort of related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dhcp3/+bug/342235 but is giving a different AppArmor error. ** Affects: dhcp3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- AppArmor prevents DHCP from getting address https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352391 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dhcp3 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 352391] [NEW] AppArmor prevents DHCP from getting address
Public bug reported: I am running Jaunty Beta on AMD64, I have dhcp3 (3.1.1-5ubuntu7) installed. Network Manager shows the constant spinning icon, and never gets an IP address. My /var/log/messages has: Mar 31 15:54:51 hostname kernel: [ 23.264536] type=1503 audit(1238504091.637:14): operation=socket_create family=inet sock_type=dgram protocol=17 pid=3269 profile=/sbin/dhclient3 This is sort of related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dhcp3/+bug/342235 but is giving a different AppArmor error. ** Affects: dhcp3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- AppArmor prevents DHCP from getting address https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352391 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
