[Bug 1307778] Re: getent group on trusty returns only local groups

2015-02-19 Thread Ryan Ritterson
** Tags added: utopic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307778

Title:
  getent group on trusty returns only local groups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307778/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1307778] Re: getent group on trusty returns only local groups

2015-02-19 Thread Ryan Ritterson
** Tags added: utopic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307778

Title:
  getent group on trusty returns only local groups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307778/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1307778] Re: getent group on trusty returns only local groups

2015-02-19 Thread Ryan Ritterson
Per Michael Wodniok's post, Samba 4.1.13 appears to have fixed the bug
with groups that don't have a GID in AD. Samba/Winbind 4.1.13 is
available in Ubuntu 15.04 (Vivid).

The issue with trying to map a group to SID S-1-18-1 still occurs, and I
still see a groups: cannot find name for group ID 10. This appears
to interfere with getent groups still.

On the other hand, setting a domain group as privileged with visudo and
then running sudo commands as a user in that group appears to work,
resolving the problem that prompted this bug report.

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307778

Title:
  getent group on trusty returns only local groups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307778/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1307778] Re: getent group on trusty returns only local groups

2015-02-19 Thread Ryan Ritterson
Per Michael Wodniok's post, Samba 4.1.13 appears to have fixed the bug
with groups that don't have a GID in AD. Samba/Winbind 4.1.13 is
available in Ubuntu 15.04 (Vivid).

The issue with trying to map a group to SID S-1-18-1 still occurs, and I
still see a groups: cannot find name for group ID 10. This appears
to interfere with getent groups still.

On the other hand, setting a domain group as privileged with visudo and
then running sudo commands as a user in that group appears to work,
resolving the problem that prompted this bug report.

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307778

Title:
  getent group on trusty returns only local groups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307778/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1307778] Re: getent group on trusty returns only local groups

2015-02-19 Thread Ryan Ritterson
@Sector

That may be a good workaround for some, but for us it won't help as
changing to an RID backend would redo all of the UID numbers for users.
That would break a number of configured services, and require a
significant amount of time to fix.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307778

Title:
  getent group on trusty returns only local groups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307778/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1307778] Re: getent group on trusty returns only local groups

2015-02-19 Thread Ryan Ritterson
@Sector

That may be a good workaround for some, but for us it won't help as
changing to an RID backend would redo all of the UID numbers for users.
That would break a number of configured services, and require a
significant amount of time to fix.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307778

Title:
  getent group on trusty returns only local groups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307778/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1399975] Re: caldendarserver requires postgres binaries in path

2014-12-06 Thread Ryan Ritterson
Ironically, I just realized that calendarserver does not depend on the
postgreSQL, though it should be, or at least, postgresql should be a
recommended package.

** Tags added: calendarserver

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1399975

Title:
  caldendarserver requires postgres binaries in path

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calendarserver/+bug/1399975/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1399975] [NEW] caldendarserver requires postgres binaries in path

2014-12-06 Thread Ryan Ritterson
Public bug reported:

In calendarserver 5.3 on Ubuntu 14.10, the launch script does not
properly launch the server using the default configuration files and the
init.d script. This is because calendarserver spawns a child postgreSQL
server by default. However, the server expects the binaries located in
/usr/lib/postgressql/x.y/bin to be in the path when launching, and exits
with an error if they are not.  See
https://www.calendarserver.org/ticket/397 for an error log under that
condition.

An easy solution is to edit the calendarserver init script and add the
appropriate directory to the path. (See attached init script for the
modification). However, my attachment should not be considered a patch
as the path is postgreSQL version specific. A more clever programmer
could add a few lines to the init script to determine the path, then add
it.

Per the linked ticket on www.calendarserver.org, this bug appears to
have existed since at least 10.04

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10
Package: calendarserver 5.2+dfsg-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-25.33-generic 3.16.7
Uname: Linux 3.16.0-25-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Dec  6 11:36:44 2014
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-12-05 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 14.10 Utopic Unicorn - Release amd64 
(20141022.2)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set
SourcePackage: calendarserver
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
modified.conffile..etc.caldavd.caldavd.plist: [modified]
modified.conffile..etc.default.calendarserver: [modified]
mtime.conffile..etc.caldavd.caldavd.plist: 2014-12-06T11:01:09.819860
mtime.conffile..etc.default.calendarserver: 2014-12-06T08:22:46.171443
mtime.conffile..etc.init.d.calendarserver: 2014-12-06T09:33:52.195770

** Affects: calendarserver (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug calendarserver utopic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1399975

Title:
  caldendarserver requires postgres binaries in path

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calendarserver/+bug/1399975/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1307778] Re: getent group on trusty returns only local groups

2014-10-14 Thread Ryan Ritterson
I believe I have tracked down the source of this bug, which will
hopefully lead to an easy fix.

The problem appears to be the inability of SID S-1-18-1 to be mapped
(See https://support.microsoft.com/kb/2830145 for an explanation why).
Winbind gets a list of all groups, and that SID is returned, then
attempts to map them to GIDs but fails because that SID cannot be
mapped.

If one runs:

wbinfo -U [uid]

then takes the SID that results and does

wbinfo --user-sids=[users SID]

a list of groups will be returned, along with the users SID. I am able
to map all of them back to objects/groups in the domain, except for the
S-1-18-1 SID.

This nicely matches the output of

groups [user]

which on my machine returns all of the groups I belong to, except for
one, for which the command returns groups: cannot find name for group
ID 10, where 10 is the beginning of the idmap * range in
smb.conf. I am almost certain the GID 10 corresponds to the
unmappable S-1-18-1 SID and is the reason getent group only returns
local groups.

A patch may be as simple as winbind just ignoring S-1-18-1 and S-1-18-2
when returned as an SID for a group.

This appears to have been the behavior for earlier versions of winbind,
as running

wbinfo -s [user SID]

on a centos 6 machine using Samba 3.6 returns all of the SIDs for the
user's groups, except the bad S-1-18-1 SID.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307778

Title:
  getent group on trusty returns only local groups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307778/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1307778] Re: getent group on trusty returns only local groups

2014-10-14 Thread Ryan Ritterson
I believe I have tracked down the source of this bug, which will
hopefully lead to an easy fix.

The problem appears to be the inability of SID S-1-18-1 to be mapped
(See https://support.microsoft.com/kb/2830145 for an explanation why).
Winbind gets a list of all groups, and that SID is returned, then
attempts to map them to GIDs but fails because that SID cannot be
mapped.

If one runs:

wbinfo -U [uid]

then takes the SID that results and does

wbinfo --user-sids=[users SID]

a list of groups will be returned, along with the users SID. I am able
to map all of them back to objects/groups in the domain, except for the
S-1-18-1 SID.

This nicely matches the output of

groups [user]

which on my machine returns all of the groups I belong to, except for
one, for which the command returns groups: cannot find name for group
ID 10, where 10 is the beginning of the idmap * range in
smb.conf. I am almost certain the GID 10 corresponds to the
unmappable S-1-18-1 SID and is the reason getent group only returns
local groups.

A patch may be as simple as winbind just ignoring S-1-18-1 and S-1-18-2
when returned as an SID for a group.

This appears to have been the behavior for earlier versions of winbind,
as running

wbinfo -s [user SID]

on a centos 6 machine using Samba 3.6 returns all of the SIDs for the
user's groups, except the bad S-1-18-1 SID.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307778

Title:
  getent group on trusty returns only local groups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307778/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1307778] Re: getent group on trusty returns only local groups

2014-04-30 Thread Ryan Ritterson
I added a gid to two different groups within the AD/OU. This does fix
the -1 GIDs, as evidenced by the replacement of one of the -1's with
GIDs 2002 and 2003 for the two different groups, one for each user:

For the same user as shown above (see the appearance of the 2003):

user@Host:~$ wbinfo -r user
2001
-1
2003
1
-1
-1
12
11

For an alternate user who had 2003 appear in place of the -1:

user@Host:~$ wbinfo -r user2
2001
-1
2002
12

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307778

Title:
  getent group on trusty returns only local groups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307778/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1307778] Re: getent group on trusty returns only local groups

2014-04-30 Thread Ryan Ritterson
I added a gid to two different groups within the AD/OU. This does fix
the -1 GIDs, as evidenced by the replacement of one of the -1's with
GIDs 2002 and 2003 for the two different groups, one for each user:

For the same user as shown above (see the appearance of the 2003):

user@Host:~$ wbinfo -r user
2001
-1
2003
1
-1
-1
12
11

For an alternate user who had 2003 appear in place of the -1:

user@Host:~$ wbinfo -r user2
2001
-1
2002
12

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307778

Title:
  getent group on trusty returns only local groups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307778/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1307778] Re: getent group on trusty returns only local groups

2014-04-21 Thread Ryan Ritterson
** Description changed:

  On Trusty, winbind version: 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2 returns groups with
  GID = -1 when using wbinfo -r:
  
- user@host:~$ wbinfo -r [user]
+ user@host:~$ wbinfo -r user
  2001
  -1
  -1
  1
  -1
  -1
  12
  11
  
  On Saucy, winbind 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.2 returned only groups with valid
  GIDs as defined in the active directory using the same command:
  
  user@otherhost:~$ wbinfo -r user
  2001
  1
  
- With this configuration, getent group returns only local groups. The
- same thing happens on a groups command run by the user at a prompt.
- However, if groups [user] is run, it returns the defined active
- directory groups, as well as a number of errors:
+ With this configuration on a Trusty host, getent group returns only
+ local groups (it does not even enumerate the active directory groups
+ with GIDs 2001  1): The same thing happens on a groups command
+ run by the user at a prompt. However, if groups [user] is run, it
+ returns the defined active directory groups, as well as a number of
+ errors (line breaks added to output for readability):
+ 
+ user@host:~$ groups
+ localgroup1 sudo
  
  user@host:~$ groups user
- user : localgroup1 sudo 
- groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295 
- groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295 
- domain admins 
- groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295 
- groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295 
- BUILTIN\users 
+ user : localgroup1 sudo
+ groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295
+ groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295
+ domain admins
+ groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295
+ groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295
+ BUILTIN\users
  BUILTIN\administrators
  
  The groups on the Trusty host with GIDs 11 and 12 as returned by
- wbinfo -r belong to BUILTIN\administrator and BUILTIN\users respectively
- (per wbinfo --gid-info=11), neither of which have defined GIDs in
- the active directory. There are several others groups within the user's
- OU that also do not have GIDs, and I suspect the -1 values belong to
- those groups.
+ wbinfo -r belong to BUILTIN\administrator and BUILTIN\users
+ respectively (per wbinfo --gid-info=11), neither of which have
+ defined GIDs in the active directory. There are several others groups
+ within the user's OU that also do not have GIDs, and I suspect the -1
+ values belong to those groups.
  
  I am not sure why the BUILTIN groups get assigned a dynamic GID (as set
- by the idmap config * : range = 10-20 line in smb.conf) when
+ by the idmap config * : range = 10-30 line in smb.conf) when
  they have no LDAP gidNumber assigned to them, while the other groups
  inside our OU get assigned gid -1 when they also have no gidNumber
  assigned to them.
  
  The smb.conf file is identical between the two hosts except for the
  server name string. The non-working host was upgraded from Saucy to
  Trusty today. Two other hosts were also upgraded, and they show exactly
  the same behavior.
  
  This issue breaks domain-wide administrative powers, as we use visudo to
  give members of the domain admins group local administrative permissions
- on all machines.
+ on all machines. sudo commands run on the Trusty host by a domain
+ admin member not also in the local sudo group fail, declaring the user
+ is not one of the sudoers
  
- Notably, getent passwd returns local and domain users, and users are
- able to login with correct UIDs using domain accounts.
+ Notably, getent passwd returns all local and domain users, and domain
+ users remain able to login with correct UIDs using domain accounts.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: libnss-winbind 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9
  Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Mon Apr 14 18:50:45 2014
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-02-13 (60 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.10 Saucy Salamander - Release amd64 
(20131016.1)
  ProcEnviron:
-  TERM=xterm-256color
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set
-  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  TERM=xterm-256color
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set
+  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SambaClientRegression: Yes
  SourcePackage: samba
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-04-15 (0 days ago)

** Description changed:

  On Trusty, winbind version: 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2 returns groups with
  GID = -1 when using wbinfo -r:
  
  user@host:~$ wbinfo -r user
  2001
  -1
  -1
  1
  -1
  -1
  12
  11
  
  On Saucy, winbind 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.2 returned only groups with valid
  GIDs as defined in the active directory using the same command:
  
  user@otherhost:~$ wbinfo -r user
  2001
  1
  
  With this configuration on a Trusty host, getent group 

[Bug 1307778] Re: getent group on trusty returns only local groups

2014-04-21 Thread Ryan Ritterson
description was updated to clean up grammar and add clarity. Nothing
substantive was changed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307778

Title:
  getent group on trusty returns only local groups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307778/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1307778] Re: getent group on trusty returns only local groups

2014-04-21 Thread Ryan Ritterson
** Description changed:

  On Trusty, winbind version: 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2 returns groups with
  GID = -1 when using wbinfo -r:
  
- user@host:~$ wbinfo -r [user]
+ user@host:~$ wbinfo -r user
  2001
  -1
  -1
  1
  -1
  -1
  12
  11
  
  On Saucy, winbind 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.2 returned only groups with valid
  GIDs as defined in the active directory using the same command:
  
  user@otherhost:~$ wbinfo -r user
  2001
  1
  
- With this configuration, getent group returns only local groups. The
- same thing happens on a groups command run by the user at a prompt.
- However, if groups [user] is run, it returns the defined active
- directory groups, as well as a number of errors:
+ With this configuration on a Trusty host, getent group returns only
+ local groups (it does not even enumerate the active directory groups
+ with GIDs 2001  1): The same thing happens on a groups command
+ run by the user at a prompt. However, if groups [user] is run, it
+ returns the defined active directory groups, as well as a number of
+ errors (line breaks added to output for readability):
+ 
+ user@host:~$ groups
+ localgroup1 sudo
  
  user@host:~$ groups user
- user : localgroup1 sudo 
- groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295 
- groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295 
- domain admins 
- groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295 
- groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295 
- BUILTIN\users 
+ user : localgroup1 sudo
+ groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295
+ groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295
+ domain admins
+ groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295
+ groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295
+ BUILTIN\users
  BUILTIN\administrators
  
  The groups on the Trusty host with GIDs 11 and 12 as returned by
- wbinfo -r belong to BUILTIN\administrator and BUILTIN\users respectively
- (per wbinfo --gid-info=11), neither of which have defined GIDs in
- the active directory. There are several others groups within the user's
- OU that also do not have GIDs, and I suspect the -1 values belong to
- those groups.
+ wbinfo -r belong to BUILTIN\administrator and BUILTIN\users
+ respectively (per wbinfo --gid-info=11), neither of which have
+ defined GIDs in the active directory. There are several others groups
+ within the user's OU that also do not have GIDs, and I suspect the -1
+ values belong to those groups.
  
  I am not sure why the BUILTIN groups get assigned a dynamic GID (as set
- by the idmap config * : range = 10-20 line in smb.conf) when
+ by the idmap config * : range = 10-30 line in smb.conf) when
  they have no LDAP gidNumber assigned to them, while the other groups
  inside our OU get assigned gid -1 when they also have no gidNumber
  assigned to them.
  
  The smb.conf file is identical between the two hosts except for the
  server name string. The non-working host was upgraded from Saucy to
  Trusty today. Two other hosts were also upgraded, and they show exactly
  the same behavior.
  
  This issue breaks domain-wide administrative powers, as we use visudo to
  give members of the domain admins group local administrative permissions
- on all machines.
+ on all machines. sudo commands run on the Trusty host by a domain
+ admin member not also in the local sudo group fail, declaring the user
+ is not one of the sudoers
  
- Notably, getent passwd returns local and domain users, and users are
- able to login with correct UIDs using domain accounts.
+ Notably, getent passwd returns all local and domain users, and domain
+ users remain able to login with correct UIDs using domain accounts.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: libnss-winbind 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9
  Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Mon Apr 14 18:50:45 2014
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-02-13 (60 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.10 Saucy Salamander - Release amd64 
(20131016.1)
  ProcEnviron:
-  TERM=xterm-256color
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set
-  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  TERM=xterm-256color
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set
+  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SambaClientRegression: Yes
  SourcePackage: samba
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-04-15 (0 days ago)

** Description changed:

  On Trusty, winbind version: 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2 returns groups with
  GID = -1 when using wbinfo -r:
  
  user@host:~$ wbinfo -r user
  2001
  -1
  -1
  1
  -1
  -1
  12
  11
  
  On Saucy, winbind 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.2 returned only groups with valid
  GIDs as defined in the active directory using the same command:
  
  user@otherhost:~$ wbinfo -r user
  2001
  1
  
  With this configuration on a Trusty host, getent group 

[Bug 1307778] Re: getent group on trusty returns only local groups

2014-04-21 Thread Ryan Ritterson
description was updated to clean up grammar and add clarity. Nothing
substantive was changed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307778

Title:
  getent group on trusty returns only local groups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307778/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1307778] [NEW] getent group on trusty returns only local groups

2014-04-14 Thread Ryan Ritterson
Public bug reported:

On Trusty, winbind version: 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2 returns groups with
GID = -1 when using wbinfo -r:

user@host:~$ wbinfo -r [user]
2001
-1
-1
1
-1
-1
12
11

On Saucy, winbind 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.2 returned only groups with valid
GIDs as defined in the active directory using the same command:

user@otherhost:~$ wbinfo -r user
2001
1

With this configuration, getent group returns only local groups. The
same thing happens on a groups command run by the user at a prompt.
However, if groups [user] is run, it returns the defined active
directory groups, as well as a number of errors:

user@host:~$ groups user
user : localgroup1 sudo 
groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295 
groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295 
domain admins 
groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295 
groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295 
BUILTIN\users 
BUILTIN\administrators

The groups on the Trusty host with GIDs 11 and 12 as returned by
wbinfo -r belong to BUILTIN\administrator and BUILTIN\users respectively
(per wbinfo --gid-info=11), neither of which have defined GIDs in
the active directory. There are several others groups within the user's
OU that also do not have GIDs, and I suspect the -1 values belong to
those groups.

I am not sure why the BUILTIN groups get assigned a dynamic GID (as set
by the idmap config * : range = 10-20 line in smb.conf) when
they have no LDAP gidNumber assigned to them, while the other groups
inside our OU get assigned gid -1 when they also have no gidNumber
assigned to them.

The smb.conf file is identical between the two hosts except for the
server name string. The non-working host was upgraded from Saucy to
Trusty today. Two other hosts were also upgraded, and they show exactly
the same behavior.

This issue breaks domain-wide administrative powers, as we use visudo to
give members of the domain admins group local administrative permissions
on all machines.

Notably, getent passwd returns local and domain users, and users are
able to login with correct UIDs using domain accounts.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: libnss-winbind 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Apr 14 18:50:45 2014
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-02-13 (60 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.10 Saucy Salamander - Release amd64 (20131016.1)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SambaClientRegression: Yes
SourcePackage: samba
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-04-15 (0 days ago)

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307778

Title:
  getent group on trusty returns only local groups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307778/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1307778] Re: getent group on trusty returns only local groups

2014-04-14 Thread Ryan Ritterson
Attached smb.conf with workgroup and hostnames changed to generics.

** Attachment added: smb.conf from Trusty host
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307778/+attachment/4083984/+files/smb.conf

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307778

Title:
  getent group on trusty returns only local groups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307778/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1307778] Re: getent group on trusty returns only local groups

2014-04-14 Thread Ryan Ritterson
I forgot to comment that I added extra line breaks to the output of
groups user for readability of the bug report.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307778

Title:
  getent group on trusty returns only local groups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307778/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1307778] Re: getent group on trusty returns only local groups

2014-04-14 Thread Ryan Ritterson
I forgot to comment that I added extra line breaks to the output of
groups user for readability of the bug report.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307778

Title:
  getent group on trusty returns only local groups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307778/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1307778] [NEW] getent group on trusty returns only local groups

2014-04-14 Thread Ryan Ritterson
Public bug reported:

On Trusty, winbind version: 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2 returns groups with
GID = -1 when using wbinfo -r:

user@host:~$ wbinfo -r [user]
2001
-1
-1
1
-1
-1
12
11

On Saucy, winbind 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.2 returned only groups with valid
GIDs as defined in the active directory using the same command:

user@otherhost:~$ wbinfo -r user
2001
1

With this configuration, getent group returns only local groups. The
same thing happens on a groups command run by the user at a prompt.
However, if groups [user] is run, it returns the defined active
directory groups, as well as a number of errors:

user@host:~$ groups user
user : localgroup1 sudo 
groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295 
groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295 
domain admins 
groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295 
groups: cannot find name for group ID 4294967295 4294967295 
BUILTIN\users 
BUILTIN\administrators

The groups on the Trusty host with GIDs 11 and 12 as returned by
wbinfo -r belong to BUILTIN\administrator and BUILTIN\users respectively
(per wbinfo --gid-info=11), neither of which have defined GIDs in
the active directory. There are several others groups within the user's
OU that also do not have GIDs, and I suspect the -1 values belong to
those groups.

I am not sure why the BUILTIN groups get assigned a dynamic GID (as set
by the idmap config * : range = 10-20 line in smb.conf) when
they have no LDAP gidNumber assigned to them, while the other groups
inside our OU get assigned gid -1 when they also have no gidNumber
assigned to them.

The smb.conf file is identical between the two hosts except for the
server name string. The non-working host was upgraded from Saucy to
Trusty today. Two other hosts were also upgraded, and they show exactly
the same behavior.

This issue breaks domain-wide administrative powers, as we use visudo to
give members of the domain admins group local administrative permissions
on all machines.

Notably, getent passwd returns local and domain users, and users are
able to login with correct UIDs using domain accounts.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: libnss-winbind 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Apr 14 18:50:45 2014
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-02-13 (60 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.10 Saucy Salamander - Release amd64 (20131016.1)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SambaClientRegression: Yes
SourcePackage: samba
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-04-15 (0 days ago)

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307778

Title:
  getent group on trusty returns only local groups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307778/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1307778] Re: getent group on trusty returns only local groups

2014-04-14 Thread Ryan Ritterson
Attached smb.conf with workgroup and hostnames changed to generics.

** Attachment added: smb.conf from Trusty host
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307778/+attachment/4083984/+files/smb.conf

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307778

Title:
  getent group on trusty returns only local groups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307778/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 709505] Re: [MASTER] fglrx failed to install/upgrade due to being incompatible with 2.6.38 kernel

2011-03-10 Thread Ryan Ritterson
With the current fglrx package version available in the repos, DKMS
fails to build the module due to kernel changes removing the big kernel
lock. So, as filed and as stands, the title is correct. I don't believe
11.2 is available pre-packaged in the natty repos yet.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709505

Title:
  [MASTER] fglrx failed to install/upgrade due to being incompatible
  with 2.6.38 kernel

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 729997] [NEW] package fglrx 2:8.801-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2011-03-05 Thread Ryan Ritterson
Public bug reported:

attached is the make.log with the included errors:

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: fglrx 2:8.801-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-5.32-generic 2.6.38-rc6
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-5-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Mar  5 20:20:11 2011
DistUpgraded: Log time: 2011-02-24 19:29:12.563490
DistroCodename: natty
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ErrorMessage: fglrx kernel module failed to build
PackageVersion: 2:8.801-0ubuntu3
SourcePackage: fglrx-installer
Title: package fglrx 2:8.801-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel 
module failed to build
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-02-25 (9 days ago)
version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.4-0ubuntu3
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.23-1ubuntu3
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 7.10.1~git20110215.cc1636b6-0ubuntu2
version.xserver-xorg: xserver-xorg 1:7.6~3ubuntu11
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.14.0-0ubuntu2
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.14.0-4ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 
1:0.0.16+git20110107+b795ca6e-0ubuntu5

** Affects: fglrx-installer (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729997

Title:
  package fglrx 2:8.801-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel
  module failed to build

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 729997] Re: package fglrx 2:8.801-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2011-03-05 Thread Ryan Ritterson
** Attachment added: make.log
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729997/+attachment/1889045/+files/make.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729997

Title:
  package fglrx 2:8.801-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel
  module failed to build

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 717999] Re: indicator-sound-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_builder_add_value()

2011-02-18 Thread Ryan Ritterson
I have been running daily updates to stay current with package versions.
Last night, something got upgraded and sound started to work on my
internal sound card but, although not on my video card based HDMI-out.
Along with those changes this crash appeared to stop happening.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717999

Title:
  indicator-sound-service crashed with SIGSEGV in
  g_variant_builder_add_value()

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 717999] Re: indicator-sound-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_builder_add_value()

2011-02-12 Thread Ryan Ritterson

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717999

Title:
  indicator-sound-service crashed with SIGSEGV in
  g_variant_builder_add_value()

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 717309] Re: software-center crashed with DatabaseModifiedError in get_pkgname(): The revision being read has been discarded - you should call Xapian::Database::reopen() and retry the operation

2011-02-11 Thread Ryan Ritterson

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717309

Title:
  software-center crashed with DatabaseModifiedError in get_pkgname():
  The revision being read has been discarded - you should call
  Xapian::Database::reopen() and retry the operation

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 717309] Re: software-center crashed with DatabaseModifiedError in get_pkgname(): The revision being read has been discarded - you should call Xapian::Database::reopen() and retry the operation

2011-02-11 Thread Ryan Ritterson
I have been running alpha 2 since it's release date, so the bug is
regressive to at least that point.

Also, if I keep software-center open, the same bug is triggered
repeatedly even without user action, causing a crash reporter window to
pop every 2 minutes or so.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717309

Title:
  software-center crashed with DatabaseModifiedError in get_pkgname():
  The revision being read has been discarded - you should call
  Xapian::Database::reopen() and retry the operation

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 365772] Re: in Jaunty, mount.nfs fails with mount(2): Input/output error

2009-05-21 Thread Ryan Ritterson
I tried connecting to the same file server with the same command on
another box with a fresh install of Jaunty x64 and the command works
with no issues. I am going to attempt to reformat this box and see if
that fixes the problem.

-- 
in Jaunty, mount.nfs fails with mount(2): Input/output error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365772
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 365772] Re: in Jaunty, mount.nfs fails with mount(2): Input/output error

2009-05-21 Thread Ryan Ritterson
In my case, the bug appears to be due to a firewall change on the server
banning this specific client's IP from connecting that happened
coincidentally while upgrading to Jaunty. I am marking the bug as
invalid, as it's not really a bug.

** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Invalid

-- 
in Jaunty, mount.nfs fails with mount(2): Input/output error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365772
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 365772] Re: in Jaunty, mount.nfs fails with mount(2): Input/output error

2009-05-20 Thread Ryan Ritterson
If I run the command as Kaustubh Srikanth runs, replacing the relevant
entries with my server and share, I get identical output.

Results of the uname are:
Linux 2.6.28-12-generic #43-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 1 19:31:32 UTC 2009

-- 
in Jaunty, mount.nfs fails with mount(2): Input/output error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365772
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 365772] Re: in Jaunty, mount.nfs fails with mount(2): Input/output error

2009-05-20 Thread Ryan Ritterson
Multiple persons comment having identical problems, so changing from new
to confirmed.

** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
in Jaunty, mount.nfs fails with mount(2): Input/output error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365772
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 365772] [NEW] in Jaunty, mount.nfs fails with mount(2): Input/output error

2009-04-23 Thread Ryan Ritterson
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: nfs-common

For some time I was affected by bug #213444, preventing me from mounting
an NFS share since Ubuntu 8.04 (Heron). That bug appears to have been
fixed (for a short time i was able to mount successfully), but now I get
an additional series of errors in Jaunty when trying to mount an NFS
share:

call: sudo mount -t nfs -o nolock - fileserver:/remoteMount localmount
which returns:
mount.nfs: mount(2): Input/output error

and

mount.nfs: mount system call failed.

We have a number of other linux systems around, running different
distributions, mostly CentOS, which have no problem mounting the server.

Of interest may be a link dumped into the system logs:

muscat kernel: [  979.924016] rpcbind: server fileserver not responding,
timed out

However, I think that's probably a red herring, as mount typically
responds with a different error message on time out, and other computers
are able to reach the NFS server without difficulty.

iptables has no rules set up, and portmapper is running. I have also
tried -o nolock (as you can see), but it appears I am affected by a
different problem than bug #306016.

Package is version 1:1.1.4-1ubuntu1

** Affects: nfs-utils (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: nfs-common
  
  For some time I was affected by bug #213444, preventing me from mounting
- an NFS share since Ubuntu 8.04 (Gutsy). That bug appears to have been
+ an NFS share since Ubuntu 8.04 (Heron). That bug appears to have been
  fixed (for a short time i was able to mount successfully), but now I get
  an additional series of errors in Jaunty when trying to mount an NFS
  share:
  
  call: sudo mount -t nfs -o nolock - fileserver:/remoteMount localmount
  which returns:
  mount.nfs: mount(2): Input/output error
  
  and
  
  mount.nfs: mount system call failed.
  
  We have a number of other linux systems around, running different
  distributions, mostly CentOS, which have no problem mounting the server.
  
  Of interest may be a link dumped into the system logs:
  
  muscat kernel: [  979.924016] rpcbind: server fileserver not responding,
  timed out
  
  However, I think that's probably a red herring, as mount typically
  responds with a different error message on time out, and other computers
  are able to reach the NFS server without difficulty.
  
  iptables has no rules set up, and portmapper is running. I have also
  tried -o nolock (as you can see), but it appears I am affected by a
  different problem than bug #306016.
  
  Package is version 1:1.1.4-1ubuntu1

-- 
in Jaunty, mount.nfs fails with mount(2): Input/output error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365772
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 279262] Re: network-manager After reboot network is totally broken

2008-10-07 Thread Ryan Ritterson
my interfaces file was similar to Kadafi's, though I do not have a
wireless interface.

A workaround to the problem is to simply removed the static section and
leave only the 'auto eth0' line, then reboot (some command may refresh
the interface without the reboot, but ifconfig eth0 down/up does not).
Of course, this is not a suitable workaround for those requiring a
static configuration, but does suffice for those who can make-do with
DHCP temporarily.

-- 
network-manager After reboot network is totally broken
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279262
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs