[Bug 1390518] [NEW] not able to get boot option for ubuntu directly, I have to boot through boot drive option in bios

2014-11-07 Thread SALIL JAIN
Public bug reported:

not  able to get boot option for ubuntu directly,I have to boot through
boot drive option in bios

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: shim 0.4-0ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-37.64-generic 3.13.11.7
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-37-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.5
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Nov  8 15:02:26 2014
Dependencies:
 
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-05-12 (180 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20140417)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_IN
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: shim
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: shim (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1390518

Title:
  not  able to get boot option for ubuntu directly,I have to boot
  through boot drive option in bios

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim/+bug/1390518/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 876745] Re: Mouse becomes unresponsive, windows are dragged around screen seemingly at random

2011-11-12 Thread Salil Joshi
It is for me since I don't use my touchpad anyway.

More importantly though, maybe this will help you or someone else figure
out why this happens.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876745

Title:
  Mouse becomes unresponsive, windows are dragged around screen
  seemingly at random

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/876745/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 876745] Re: Mouse becomes unresponsive, windows are dragged around screen seemingly at random

2011-11-09 Thread Salil Joshi
I have the same problem and the same hardware.

You can fix this by disabling your touchpad. I have no idea why this
occurs though.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876745

Title:
  Mouse becomes unresponsive, windows are dragged around screen
  seemingly at random

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/876745/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 800235] [NEW] firefox addons web page is not opening just it keep loading

2011-06-21 Thread salil kumar
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: firefox

mozilla addon not opens

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: firefox 5.0+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.11.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-10.44-generic 2.6.38.7
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-10-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Jun 21 20:29:44 2011
FirefoxPackages:
 firefox 5.0+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.11.04.1
 flashplugin-installer 10.3.181.26ubuntu0.11.04.1
 adobe-flashplugin N/A
 icedtea-plugin 1.1~20110420-0ubuntu1.1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007.1)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US:en
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: firefox
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-06-11 (10 days ago)

** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: salil kumar (salil-kumar37)
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty running-unity

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800235

Title:
  firefox addons  web page is not opening just it keep loading

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/800235/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 800235] Re: firefox addons web page is not opening just it keep loading

2011-06-21 Thread salil kumar
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = salil kumar (salil-kumar37)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800235

Title:
  firefox addons  web page is not opening just it keep loading

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/800235/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 799492] [NEW] addons site not opens

2011-06-19 Thread salil kumar
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: firefox

addons.mozilla.org not opens in my firefox .Plz  help me.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: firefox 5.0+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.11.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-10.44-generic 2.6.38.7
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-10-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Jun 19 23:08:05 2011
FirefoxPackages:
 firefox 5.0+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.11.04.1
 flashplugin-installer 10.3.181.26ubuntu0.11.04.1
 adobe-flashplugin N/A
 icedtea-plugin 1.1~20110420-0ubuntu1.1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007.1)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US:en
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: firefox
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-06-11 (8 days ago)

** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty running-unity

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799492

Title:
  addons site not opens

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/799492/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 799492] Re: addons site not opens

2011-06-19 Thread salil kumar
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799492

Title:
  addons site not opens

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/799492/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 796718] Re: addons site not opene in my firefox

2011-06-13 Thread salil kumar
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/796718

Title:
  addons site not opene in my firefox

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/796718/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 796718] [NEW] addons site not opene in my firefox

2011-06-13 Thread salil kumar
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: firefox

addons site not open in firefox just keep loading

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: firefox 5.0~b5+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.11.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-10.44-generic 2.6.38.7
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-10-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Jun 13 22:32:25 2011
FirefoxPackages:
 firefox 5.0~b5+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.11.04.1
 flashplugin-installer 10.3.181.22ubuntu0.11.04.1
 adobe-flashplugin N/A
 icedtea-plugin 1.1~20110420-0ubuntu1.1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007.1)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US:en
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: firefox
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-06-11 (2 days ago)

** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty running-unity

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/796718

Title:
  addons site not opene in my firefox

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/796718/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 599666] Re: Built in microphone produces no sound on Dell Latitude E4310 (Intel 8086:3b57)

2011-05-29 Thread Salil
Fix #12 works for my Dell Vostro 1500 in 11.04
No reboot required

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599666

Title:
  Built in microphone produces no sound on Dell Latitude E4310 (Intel
  8086:3b57)

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 673424] Re: their is problem in opening web site www.piratebay.com

2010-11-10 Thread salil kumar


-- 
their is problem in opening web site www.piratebay.com
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673424
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 673424] [NEW] their is problem in opening web site www.piratebay.com

2010-11-10 Thread salil kumar
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: firefox

it is taking long time for prossing not their is no result but the web
page is not opening

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: firefox 3.6.12+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.10.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.35-generic 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Nov 10 15:18:24 2010
FirefoxPackages:
 firefox 3.6.12+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.10.1
 firefox-gnome-support 3.6.12+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.10.1
 firefox-branding 3.6.12+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.10.1
 abroswer N/A
 abrowser-branding N/A
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007.1)
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: firefox

** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick

-- 
their is problem in opening web site www.piratebay.com
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673424
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 673089] [NEW] their is problem in opening https://addons.mozilla.org some other sites

2010-11-09 Thread salil kumar
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: firefox

intrepted connection

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: firefox 3.6.12+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.10.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.35-generic 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Nov  9 21:51:01 2010
FirefoxPackages:
 firefox 3.6.12+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.10.1
 firefox-gnome-support 3.6.12+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.10.1
 firefox-branding 3.6.12+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.10.1
 abroswer N/A
 abrowser-branding N/A
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007.1)
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: firefox

** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick

-- 
their is problem in opening https://addons.mozilla.org  some other sites
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673089
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 673089] Re: their is problem in opening https://addons.mozilla.org some other sites

2010-11-09 Thread salil kumar


-- 
their is problem in opening https://addons.mozilla.org  some other sites
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673089
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 673089] Re: their is problem in opening https://addons.mozilla.org some other sites

2010-11-09 Thread salil kumar
their is problem in opening sites

-- 
their is problem in opening https://addons.mozilla.org  some other sites
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673089
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 416313] Re: On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails

2009-12-02 Thread Salil
Apologies for not being clear and informative in the previous comment.

Yes even in the debian samba package, the error is seen for vfat only - not
for ext2/3.

My preliminary opinion is that the issue is with respect to the way samba is
currently handling large file transfers for vfat file systems and hence not
necessarily a vfat issue.
But as it is seen only on ARM platform, maybe something going haywire while
handling large files because of some ARM specific peculiarities like
alignment issues etc.?

Regards,
Salil

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 from teh last comment it is not really clear to me if thats a vfat or
 actually a samba issue, since it doesnt seem to happen with different
 other underlying filesystems but seems to only occur on vfat.

 salil, if you use debians samba package, do you see the same behavior
 wrt ext2/3/4 vs vfat ?

 --
 On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416313
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in “samba” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed

 Bug description:
 Binary package hint: samba

 I am using ubuntu-arm on Sheevaplug platform - Jaunty-9.04 - A samba share
 is exported, I can access it fine from windows copy/paste  small sized files
 easily. But when I try to copy a larger sized file, greater than 100 M or
 so, the copy fails after a minute or so saying 'Network Name is no longer
 available'. Now the copying is still going on in the background - because I
 can see the size of the file increasing via console on the sheevaplug.  I
 have fair reason to believe that this might be the call to ftruncate() which
 is taking a lot of time. So a way out might be to compile samba again with
 'enable large-file' support of something similar.
 Right now it appears to be broken.


-- 
On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416313
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 416313] Re: On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails

2009-12-02 Thread Salil
Apologies for not being clear and informative in the previous comment.

Yes even in the debian samba package, the error is seen for vfat only - not
for ext2/3.

My preliminary opinion is that the issue is with respect to the way samba is
currently handling large file transfers for vfat file systems and hence not
necessarily a vfat issue.
But as it is seen only on ARM platform, maybe something going haywire while
handling large files because of some ARM specific peculiarities like
alignment issues etc.?

Regards,
Salil

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 from teh last comment it is not really clear to me if thats a vfat or
 actually a samba issue, since it doesnt seem to happen with different
 other underlying filesystems but seems to only occur on vfat.

 salil, if you use debians samba package, do you see the same behavior
 wrt ext2/3/4 vs vfat ?

 --
 On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416313
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in “samba” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed

 Bug description:
 Binary package hint: samba

 I am using ubuntu-arm on Sheevaplug platform - Jaunty-9.04 - A samba share
 is exported, I can access it fine from windows copy/paste  small sized files
 easily. But when I try to copy a larger sized file, greater than 100 M or
 so, the copy fails after a minute or so saying 'Network Name is no longer
 available'. Now the copying is still going on in the background - because I
 can see the size of the file increasing via console on the sheevaplug.  I
 have fair reason to believe that this might be the call to ftruncate() which
 is taking a lot of time. So a way out might be to compile samba again with
 'enable large-file' support of something similar.
 Right now it appears to be broken.


-- 
On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416313
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 416313] Re: On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails

2009-12-01 Thread Salil
Hi Chuck,
Thanks for replying.

Unfortunately the bug is still observed - i did some additional triaging.
* The bug is seen only when the samba share exported is on a vfat file
system - for ext2 and ext3 the large sized copy succeeds without fail.
* I also tried using the samba package from debian-arm
repositories(lenny-stable) - but there also the problem is seen.
* Even if the error is thrown up - the file is still being copied in the
background - or ftruncate'ing in the background (I suspect it is only
ftruncating and filling the space with zeroes because of two reasons - one
the md5sums do not match afterwards and two the code seems to be doing the
same thing) - but as previously stated adding a patch to always call
ftruncate64() in sys_ftruncate() does not fix the problem.

Regards,
Salil


On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Chuck Short chuck.sh...@canonical.comwrote:

 Hi Salil,

 I was wondering if you were still having this problem?

 Regards
 chuck

 ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low

 --
 On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416313
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in “samba” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete

 Bug description:
 Binary package hint: samba

 I am using ubuntu-arm on Sheevaplug platform - Jaunty-9.04 - A samba share
 is exported, I can access it fine from windows copy/paste  small sized files
 easily. But when I try to copy a larger sized file, greater than 100 M or
 so, the copy fails after a minute or so saying 'Network Name is no longer
 available'. Now the copying is still going on in the background - because I
 can see the size of the file increasing via console on the sheevaplug.  I
 have fair reason to believe that this might be the call to ftruncate() which
 is taking a lot of time. So a way out might be to compile samba again with
 'enable large-file' support of something similar.
 Right now it appears to be broken.


-- 
On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416313
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 416313] Re: On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails

2009-12-01 Thread Salil
Hi Chuck,
Thanks for replying.

Unfortunately the bug is still observed - i did some additional triaging.
* The bug is seen only when the samba share exported is on a vfat file
system - for ext2 and ext3 the large sized copy succeeds without fail.
* I also tried using the samba package from debian-arm
repositories(lenny-stable) - but there also the problem is seen.
* Even if the error is thrown up - the file is still being copied in the
background - or ftruncate'ing in the background (I suspect it is only
ftruncating and filling the space with zeroes because of two reasons - one
the md5sums do not match afterwards and two the code seems to be doing the
same thing) - but as previously stated adding a patch to always call
ftruncate64() in sys_ftruncate() does not fix the problem.

Regards,
Salil


On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Chuck Short chuck.sh...@canonical.comwrote:

 Hi Salil,

 I was wondering if you were still having this problem?

 Regards
 chuck

 ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low

 --
 On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416313
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in “samba” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete

 Bug description:
 Binary package hint: samba

 I am using ubuntu-arm on Sheevaplug platform - Jaunty-9.04 - A samba share
 is exported, I can access it fine from windows copy/paste  small sized files
 easily. But when I try to copy a larger sized file, greater than 100 M or
 so, the copy fails after a minute or so saying 'Network Name is no longer
 available'. Now the copying is still going on in the background - because I
 can see the size of the file increasing via console on the sheevaplug.  I
 have fair reason to believe that this might be the call to ftruncate() which
 is taking a lot of time. So a way out might be to compile samba again with
 'enable large-file' support of something similar.
 Right now it appears to be broken.


-- 
On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416313
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 259830] Re: Honor gnome proxy setting

2009-10-13 Thread Salil
That shouldn't matter.

Use https://username:p...@twitter.com in the 'connect' method, where
username and password are your twitter username and pass (I'm not suggesting
you hard code this.. use self.get_auth(), but prepend the info to the url
instead of instead of passing it as the headers argument in urllib2.urlopen)

If you do this, and if you https_proxy is set correctly, then urllib2 should
do the rest.

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Lionel Dricot pl...@ploum.net wrote:

 helifeuer  I use a proxy without autorisation (no login needed) so I
 don't see what I could change.

 --
 Honor gnome proxy setting
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259830
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.


-- 
Honor gnome proxy setting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 416313] Re: On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails

2009-09-07 Thread Salil
I am configuring it from the server side - and accessing it through windows
client, so passing lfs option to smbmount is not possible or i am not aware
of how to :)
Update on the bug: I compiled debian package with --enable-largefile - no
change.
Then created a custom patch which would always call ftruncate64() in
sys_ftruncate() - however client would still throw up error while copying
large files.

Thanks for the reply,

Regards,
Salil

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Chuck Short
chuck.sh...@canonical.comwrote:

 Have you tried mounting with the lfs options?

 Thanks
 chuck

 ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

 --
 On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416313
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in “samba” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete

 Bug description:
 Binary package hint: samba

 I am using ubuntu-arm on Sheevaplug platform - Jaunty-9.04 - A samba share
 is exported, I can access it fine from windows copy/paste  small sized files
 easily. But when I try to copy a larger sized file, greater than 100 M or
 so, the copy fails after a minute or so saying 'Network Name is no longer
 available'. Now the copying is still going on in the background - because I
 can see the size of the file increasing via console on the sheevaplug.  I
 have fair reason to believe that this might be the call to ftruncate() which
 is taking a lot of time. So a way out might be to compile samba again with
 'enable large-file' support of something similar.
 Right now it appears to be broken.


-- 
On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416313
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 416313] Re: On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails

2009-09-07 Thread Salil
I am configuring it from the server side - and accessing it through windows
client, so passing lfs option to smbmount is not possible or i am not aware
of how to :)
Update on the bug: I compiled debian package with --enable-largefile - no
change.
Then created a custom patch which would always call ftruncate64() in
sys_ftruncate() - however client would still throw up error while copying
large files.

Thanks for the reply,

Regards,
Salil

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Chuck Short
chuck.sh...@canonical.comwrote:

 Have you tried mounting with the lfs options?

 Thanks
 chuck

 ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

 --
 On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416313
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in “samba” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete

 Bug description:
 Binary package hint: samba

 I am using ubuntu-arm on Sheevaplug platform - Jaunty-9.04 - A samba share
 is exported, I can access it fine from windows copy/paste  small sized files
 easily. But when I try to copy a larger sized file, greater than 100 M or
 so, the copy fails after a minute or so saying 'Network Name is no longer
 available'. Now the copying is still going on in the background - because I
 can see the size of the file increasing via console on the sheevaplug.  I
 have fair reason to believe that this might be the call to ftruncate() which
 is taking a lot of time. So a way out might be to compile samba again with
 'enable large-file' support of something similar.
 Right now it appears to be broken.


-- 
On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416313
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 416313] [NEW] On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails

2009-08-20 Thread Salil
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: samba

I am using ubuntu-arm on Sheevaplug platform - Jaunty-9.04 - A samba share is 
exported, I can access it fine from windows copy/paste  small sized files 
easily. But when I try to copy a larger sized file, greater than 100 M or so, 
the copy fails after a minute or so saying 'Network Name is no longer 
available'. Now the copying is still going on in the background - because I can 
see the size of the file increasing via console on the sheevaplug.  I have fair 
reason to believe that this might be the call to ftruncate() which is taking a 
lot of time. So a way out might be to compile samba again with 'enable 
large-file' support of something similar.
Right now it appears to be broken.

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416313
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 416313] [NEW] On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails

2009-08-20 Thread Salil
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: samba

I am using ubuntu-arm on Sheevaplug platform - Jaunty-9.04 - A samba share is 
exported, I can access it fine from windows copy/paste  small sized files 
easily. But when I try to copy a larger sized file, greater than 100 M or so, 
the copy fails after a minute or so saying 'Network Name is no longer 
available'. Now the copying is still going on in the background - because I can 
see the size of the file increasing via console on the sheevaplug.  I have fair 
reason to believe that this might be the call to ftruncate() which is taking a 
lot of time. So a way out might be to compile samba again with 'enable 
large-file' support of something similar.
Right now it appears to be broken.

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
On samba of ubuntu-arm, large file copy fails 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416313
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs