[Bug 1885403] Re: posttls-finger fails to connect to private/tlsmgr

2020-06-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
No. We've had postfix in a chroot since approximately forever. It might be something in default path resolution has changed? Since I no longer us Ubuntu, I really don't know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1885403] Re: posttls-finger fails to connect to private/tlsmgr

2020-06-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
We (Debian and derivatives such as Ubuntu) have postfix in a chroot by default. This is a side effect of that configuration. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1885403 Title:

Re: [Bug 1881196] Re: postfix tls deploy-server-cert fails with "can't shift that many"

2020-06-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, June 18, 2020 9:46:34 AM EDT you wrote: > To do that a process needs to be defined for future Postfix SRUs > containing micro-release updates. I see we already have some good DEP-8 > tests, so we'd need to write a wiki page describing this process and ask > the SRU team to acknowledge

Re: [Bug 1881196] Re: postfix tls deploy-server-cert fails with "can't shift that many"

2020-06-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, June 17, 2020 5:51:07 PM EDT Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > I see this fix in version 3.4.13. Hopefully this postfix SRU [1] will be > accepted and we will have version 3.4.11 in Focal, so we have two patch > level releases to consider if we want to update to 3.4.13. Checking the >

[Bug 1883331] Re: DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive results in failed installation

2020-06-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
installed postfix package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 75 This exist status indicates the system does not have a proper hostname set. It is a local configuration issue and not a package bug. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You

[Bug 1657024] Re: mydomain gets set to "localdomain"

2020-06-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
I looked into the history of this. We used to have a patch in Debian to use gethostbyname to address this issue. It was dropped because it caused worse problems. Here's the relevant code snippet from the most recent postfix release: /* * If the local machine name is not in FQDN form,

Re: [Bug 1881196] Re: postfix tls deploy-server-cert fails with "can't shift that many"

2020-06-10 Thread Scott Kitterman
https://github.com/vdukhovni/postfix/commit/ 119d6abed969b1b30c62722ae31c854b5682beae#diff-1843f98f5710e97bd063d5807334442a There will be a new 3.4 release in a few days, I'd just update your SRU to encompass that when it comes out. It's all bug fixes, reported by users or not. -- You

Re: [Bug 1868955] Re: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr

2020-06-09 Thread Scott Kitterman
In that case, someone with the new libc and postfix 3.4.11/3.5.2 or later should write to the postfix-users list and ask for help. My recollection is that the upstream developers did not have access to a system with the new libc and were dependent on third party testing, so something may have

Re: [Bug 1868955] Re: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr

2020-06-08 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, June 8, 2020 4:59:30 PM EDT you wrote: > postfix (3.5.2-1+b1) sid; urgency=low, binary-only=yes > . >* Binary-only non-maintainer upload for amd64; no source changes. >* Rebuild against libicu67 > . > -- all / amd64 / i386 Build Daemon (x86-conova-01) > Wed, 03 Jun 2020

[Bug 1868955] Re: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr

2020-06-08 Thread Scott Kitterman
That change is included in postfix 3.4.11 which is, of course, just after the one that's in 20.04. "Someone" (i.e. not me) should look into an SRU to update postfix. It has an existing microversion release authorization from the Tech Board, so it shouldn't be too hard, it just takes someone

[Bug 1868955] Re: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr

2020-06-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
Re-assigning to glibc then. I think that's a good demonstration this isn't a postfix issue. ** Package changed: postfix (Ubuntu) => glibc (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1881196] Re: postfix tls deploy-server-cert fails with "can't shift that many"

2020-05-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
Postfix doesn't have a bug tracker. Their policy is to fix bugs when they are identified. Emailing postfix-users is the correct path forward. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881196

Re: [Bug 1880970] Re: Postfix refuses to start because file postfix-files is missing

2020-05-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
That's almost certainly not the case. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1880970 Title: Postfix refuses to start because file postfix-files is missing To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1880970] Re: Postfix refuses to start because file postfix-files is missing

2020-05-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
The package ships the file, so it's not a postfix bug. https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/amd64/postfix/filelist ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1556681] Re: python-pip requires python-setuptools but not drawn in as a dependancy

2020-05-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
Fixed in focal and later up to the point where the package was removed. ** Changed in: python-pip (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556681

[Bug 1676675] Re: python3-pip package missing dependency for python3-pyparsing

2020-05-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
Fixed in bionic and later. ** Changed in: python-pip (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1676675 Title: python3-pip package missing dependency

[Bug 1773794] Re: python3-pip now requires python3-distutils

2020-05-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
Fixed in focal and later. ** Changed in: python-pip (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773794 Title: python3-pip now requires

[Bug 1635463] Re: pip freeze includes "pkg-resources==0.0.0"

2020-05-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
Fixed in Focal/Groove. ** Changed in: python-pip (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1860270] Re: python-bleach: autopkgtest regression in -release

2020-05-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
This was fixed by reverting the breaking change in python3 3.7 and 3.8. ** Changed in: python-bleach (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860270

[Bug 1444968] Re: Postfix init.d scripts malfunction in an unprivilleged Docker container

2020-05-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
This was fixed in 3.4.7-2. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1444968 Title: Postfix init.d scripts malfunction in an

[Bug 1548594] Re: Convert test suite to python 3.0

2020-05-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
This was fixed in 3.4.7-2. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1548594 Title: Convert test suite to python 3.0

[Bug 1684037] Re: Wrong systemd dependencies prevent postfix from starting

2020-05-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
This was fixed in 3.3.2-1. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1684037 Title: Wrong systemd dependencies prevent

[Bug 1460203] Re: Drop set_user_default.patch

2020-05-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
In any case, this bug was about dropping deltas from Debian, not upstream and Debian/Ubuntu handle this the same now. ** Changed in: python-pip (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: python-pip (Ubuntu) Milestone: ubuntu-15.10 => None -- You received this bug

[Bug 1873369] Re: Python2 virtualenv installs broken pip command

2020-05-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
It's fixed in python-virtualenv 20.0.20+ds-1 and python-pip 20.1-1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873369 Title: Python2 virtualenv installs broken pip command To manage

[Bug 1586381] Re: Pip states report "AttributeError: 'Requirement' object has no attribute 'project_name'" since python-pip (8.1.1-2ubuntu0.1)

2020-05-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
** No longer affects: python-pip (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: python-pip (Ubuntu Xenial) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1586381 Title: Pip states report "AttributeError:

[Bug 1869431] Re: TypeError: '>' not supported between instances of 'Version' and 'Version'

2020-05-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
This was due to an incompatibility between the way pip and setuptools manage their vendored modules. The problem was worked around by a change in the Debian python-pip package (20.0.2-4) which was sync'ed into Ubuntu. It's not a virtualenv bug. python-pip | 20.0.2-5ubuntu1 |

[Bug 1579181] Re: "pip3 list --outdated" raises TypeError

2020-05-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
The fix for this was included in 20.0.2-4 imported from Debian. python-pip | 20.0.2-5ubuntu1 | focal/universe | source python-pip | 20.0.2-5ubuntu1 | groovy/universe | source ** Changed in: python-pip (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released --

[Bug 1833229] Re: `--extra-index-url` not working for PIP

2020-05-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
The fix was included in pip 20.0.2 brought in from Debian: python-pip | 20.0.2-5ubuntu1 | focal/universe | source python-pip | 20.0.2-5ubuntu1 | groovy/universe | source ** Changed in: python-pip (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You

[Bug 1874923] Re: Postfix documentation may have an error

2020-04-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
This is not a postfix bug. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874923 Title: Postfix documentation may have an error To

[Bug 1872288] Re: Focal Fossa: postfix configure-instance script typos

2020-04-12 Thread Scott Kitterman
This is fixed in the Debian postfix git repository, but not uploaded yet. Please use this approach vice what's in the patch. https://salsa.debian.org/postfix-team/postfix- dev/-/commit/b8e0b846e34eeaaa2315ead2304824b21b01fe7a -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

Re: [Bug 1868955] Re: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr

2020-03-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, March 26, 2020 5:31:05 PM EDT you wrote: > On 2020-03-26 3:54 p.m., Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Does applying this change help: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/postfix-team/postfix-dev/-/commit/ > > b8e0b846e34eeaaa2315ead2304824b21b01fe7a > > Does

Re: [Bug 1868955] Re: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr

2020-03-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
There are some differences between stable and what was in unstable that Ubuntu synced. Does applying this change help: https://salsa.debian.org/postfix-team/postfix-dev/-/commit/ b8e0b846e34eeaaa2315ead2304824b21b01fe7a Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

Re: [Bug 1868955] Re: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr

2020-03-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, March 26, 2020 12:22:20 PM EDT you wrote: > Comparing strace between Ubuntu and Debian (lxc launch images:debian/10) > showed that Debian's version doesn't try to connect to the tlsmgr socket > for some reason. > > Ubuntu 3.4.10-1: ... > Debian 3.4.8-0+10debu1: ... If you use

Re: [Bug 1868955] Re: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr

2020-03-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
I don't recall seeing this issue in Debian, so I don't have any particular suggestions. Since the postfix is identical, I'd be inclined to look elsewhere. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 861645] Re: Apport retracer dupes bugs that aren't dupes

2020-03-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, March 6, 2020 2:49:21 AM EST you wrote: > I'm so sorry this issue went unanswered for 9 years.. The backlog we've > accrued here is truly unfortunate. We'd really like to see the situation > improve, but with nearly 1300 open bugs, manually testing each has > become virtually

[Bug 861645] Re: Apport retracer dupes bugs that aren't dupes

2020-03-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
9 years later. Lovely. I don't even use Ubuntu anymore. ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/861645 Title: Apport

Re: [Bug 1860315] Re: Default installation should be Local Only

2020-01-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, January 30, 2020 12:52:00 AM EST you wrote: > Thanks Scott. Sincere questions: do you have any evidence users > appreciate the current default? I'm asking myself what is the use case > in which a user wants postfix to be installed, listening on all > interfaces and yet..

Re: [Bug 1860315] Re: Default installation should be Local Only

2020-01-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, January 27, 2020 5:05:06 AM EST you wrote: > Hi kiko, > > > I have a highly customized set up, with vhosts, ldap, etc, and I > > installed the package first to be able to configure it, and immediately > after installed I started dropping email. > > Clearly this was surprising to you.

Re: [Bug 1845334] Re: Update DEP8 test to python3

2019-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, November 1, 2019 8:59:55 AM EDT you wrote: > I have a pass with python3 for 3.4.7-1 in debian/sid. Let me clean that > branch up now and make a MR in salsa. > > ** Attachment added: "log" > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1845334/+attachment/ >

[Bug 1845334] Re: Update DEP8 test to python3

2019-10-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
Any word on this? It'd be nice to get it done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845334 Title: Update DEP8 test to python3 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1728723] Re: postfix check warns about symlink being group writable

2019-09-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728723 Title: postfix check warns about symlink being group writable To manage

[Bug 1834511] Re: policyd-spf crashes on UnicodeEncodeError

2019-06-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
That's correct. It was fixed in 2.0.0, but I'm not sure the fix would directly apply to 1.3.2. I've targeted the bug appropriately for 16.04. Perhaps someone involved in Ubuntu development will take a look. ** Also affects: pypolicyd-spf (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status:

[Bug 1826908] Re: postfix 3.1.0: postinst contains broken tests

2019-04-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
That's got it properly triaged. I only work on postfix in Debian, so I can't say if this will be fixed or not in Ubuntu. ** Also affects: postfix (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in:

Re: [Bug 1826534] [NEW] Pix workaround should be (partially?) disabled when DANE is in use

2019-04-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
This is something that you should address with upstream (postfix-users mailing list is the best venue). Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1826534 Title: Pix workaround should

[Bug 1791853] Re: Postfix upgrade queries about replacing /etc/postfix/makedefs.out, when it really should always do so

2019-03-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
No idea why the remote bug status isn't updating, but this is fixed in Debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791853 Title: Postfix upgrade queries about replacing

[Bug 1817363] Re: postfix-policyd-spf-python always appends as recepient address

2019-02-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
This is not a bug, but an intentional design change to, by default, better protect user privacy. See man 5 policyd-spf.conf for details. To restore the previous behaviour, add this to the policy server's configuration: Hide_Receiver = No ** Changed in: pypolicyd-spf (Ubuntu) Status: New

Re: [Bug 1812571] [NEW] postfix-dbgsym package has empty .debug files; debian/rules dh_strip confusion

2019-01-20 Thread Scott Kitterman
This is fixed in 3.3.2-1, which is in disco. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812571 Title: postfix-dbgsym package has empty .debug files; debian/rules dh_strip confusion

[Bug 1153064] Re: Quassel IRC client has a 2 pixel window start position creep

2019-01-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
It turns out this was a Qt bug. ** Changed in: quassel (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1153064 Title: Quassel IRC client has a 2 pixel

[Bug 833751] Re: error in English string

2019-01-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
** Changed in: quassel (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833751 Title: error in English string To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1787584] Re: segfault on messages without RFC5322.From header

2018-12-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
** Also affects: opendmarc (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: opendmarc (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: opendmarc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1553928] Re: postfix-pgsql SSL connection to postgres

2018-12-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
This is fixed in 3.3. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553928 Title: postfix-pgsql SSL connection to postgres

[Bug 1753470] Re: Postconf segfaults every 5 minutes

2018-11-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
FYI, this is fixed in 3.3.1 upstream, so when that lands, this diff can be dropped. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753470 Title: Postconf segfaults every 5 minutes To manage

[Bug 1777085] Re: package clamtk 5.25-1 failed to install/upgrade: poging tot overschrijven van '/usr/share/Thunar/sendto/thunar-sendto-clamtk.desktop', wat ook in pakket thunar-sendto-clamtk 0.06-1 z

2018-10-31 Thread Scott Kitterman
Fixed for the next upload in Debian that will, in due course, make its way to Ubuntu. ** Changed in: clamtk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: clamtk (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: clamtk (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Scott

Re: [Bug 1791853] Re: Postfix upgrade queries about replacing /etc/postfix/makedefs.out, when it really should always do so

2018-09-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, September 17, 2018 06:10:30 AM you wrote: > This isn't sometihng we'd want to take a Delta in Ubuntu for IMHO, so > I'm waiting if my Debian submission will be accepted. I expect I'll apply the change, but am severely lacking in time right now. It would help if you could submit a

Re: [Bug 1782416] Re: Python3 Compat Problem: "Cannot use a bytes pattern on a string-like object"

2018-07-19 Thread Scott Kitterman
I'm open to changes for type hinting. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782416 Title: Python3 Compat Problem: "Cannot use a bytes pattern on a string-like object" To manage

[Bug 1782416] Re: Python3 Compat Problem: "Cannot use a bytes pattern on a string-like object"

2018-07-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
This is true pretty much throughout dkimpy when used with python3. It's not particularly feasible to change it. I'm open to suggestions on improved documentation. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1782416] Re: Python3 Compat Problem: "Cannot use a bytes pattern on a string-like object"

2018-07-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
If you feed it bytes, it works fine: >>> print(message) b'Authentication-Results: lists.example.org; arc=none; spf=pass smtp.mfrom=jqd@d1.example; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i=@d1.example; dmarc=pass\nReceived: from localhost\nMessage-ID: \nDate: Mon, 01 Jan 2011 01:02:03 +0400\nFrom:

[Bug 1773200] Re: package postfix (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: new postfix package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2018-05-25 Thread Scott Kitterman
It looks more like a debconf issue to me: Preparing to unpack .../1-postfix_3.3.0-1_amd64.deb ... Gtk-Message: 20:19:38.211: GtkDialog mapped without a transient parent. This is discouraged. Use of uninitialized value $ret in scalar chomp at

[Bug 1753470] Re: Postconf segfaults every 5 minutes

2018-05-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
** Package changed: update (Ubuntu) => postfix (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753470 Title: Postconf segfaults every 5 minutes To manage notifications about this bug go

Re: [Bug 1753470] Re: Postconf segfaults every 5 minutes

2018-05-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, May 07, 2018 08:56:52 PM you wrote: > Thanks Scott, I did email postfix-users with subject "NULL pointer deref > in pcf_check_dbms_client() with unreadable map file", but I'm not > subscribed. Checking the archive at https://marc.info/?l=postfix-> > users=1=201805=2 doesn't show my

Re: [Bug 1753470] Re: Postconf segfaults every 5 minutes

2018-05-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, May 07, 2018 03:43:26 PM you wrote: > I think the only contact to the developers is their postfix-devel > mailing list here: > > http://www.postfix.org/lists.html postfix-devel is generally for developers of postfix. Users should use postfix-users (even for code issues like this).

Re: [Bug 1753470] Re: Postconf segfaults every 5 minutes

2018-05-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, May 07, 2018 04:47:07 PM you wrote: > And this is new in 3.3.0. I was also looking for some git/svn/bzr/cvs > repository to check the history of these changes, but couldn't find it. This is maintained by one of the primary postfix developers: https://github.com/vdukhovni/postfix It's

Re: [Bug 1753470] Re: Postconf segfaults every 5 minutes

2018-05-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, May 07, 2018 03:14:56 PM you wrote: > vstream_fopen() did return 0 and errno was set to EACCES, I don't know > why that check is excluding the permission problem. I emailed upstream > (couldn't find a bugtracker for it). There is no postfix bugtracker upstream. Did you mail the

[Bug 1769393] Re: package postfix-doc 3.3.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: installed postfix-doc package pre-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2018-05-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
This only happens if you've manually deleted /etc/postfix/main.cf but left the postfix package installed. This is not a supported configuration. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

Re: [Bug 1767539] Re: Security fixes from 0.12.5 require backfit to earlier releases

2018-05-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, May 02, 2018 07:27:36 AM you wrote: > Thanks Scott. I've gone ahead and built this package in the > https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/ ; > given the large amount of code around the introduced deserializer, I'd > like to see a successful test report

[Bug 1767539] Re: Security fixes from 0.12.5 require backfit to earlier releases

2018-04-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #896914 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896914 ** Also affects: quassel (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896914 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1767539] [NEW] Security fixes from 0.12.5 require backfit to earlier releases

2018-04-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: A recent upstream release contains two security fixes. All supported Ubuntu releases are affected. * SECURITY UPDATE: quasselcore, corruption of heap metadata caused by qdatastream -

[Bug 657350] Re: Crash in ubi-console-setup.py during install

2018-04-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
I'm not using Kubuntu anymore anyway. ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657350 Title: Crash in

[Bug 628894] Re: Manual partition problem alert when there isn't an actual problem

2018-04-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
Not using Kubuntu anymore anyway. ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to ubiquity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628894 Title: Manual partition

[Bug 1694843] Re: opendmarc ignores configuration

2018-03-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
This was fixed in 1.3.2-3. ** Changed in: opendmarc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1694843 Title: opendmarc ignores configuration

[Bug 1748726] Re: postfix incorrectly depends on e2fsprogs

2018-02-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1748726 Title: postfix incorrectly depends on e2fsprogs To manage notifications about

[Bug 1238559] Re: Exception causes next transaction to abort

2018-02-09 Thread Scott Kitterman
Did you ever get this figured out? ** Changed in: psycopg2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1238559 Title: Exception causes next transaction

[Bug 650777] Re: operator does not exist: text = bytea

2018-02-09 Thread Scott Kitterman
Presumably this is resolved by now. Please set back to new if not. ** Changed in: psycopg2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/650777 Title:

[Bug 1304138] Re: Backport 2.5 bugfixes

2018-02-09 Thread Scott Kitterman
** Changed in: psycopg2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1304138 Title: Backport 2.5 bugfixes To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1218727] Re: package clamav-base 0.97.8+dfsg-1ubuntu1.12.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2018-01-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
Fix in Debian packaging git repository for the next upload to Debian. Once that's uploaded, Ubuntu can update from that to get the fix. ** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1684037] Re: Wrong systemd dependencies prevent postfix from starting

2017-11-10 Thread Scott Kitterman
I agree it's not a duplicate. I've seen this in Debian as well and haven't solved it their either. ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1531299 postfix upgrade can fail due to "newaliases: fatal: inet_addr_local[getifaddrs]: getifaddrs: Address family not supported by protocol" under

Re: [Bug 1709504] [NEW] Postfix Files that shouldn't be writable.

2017-08-08 Thread Scott Kitterman
It was fixed in Debian later, but it's harmless. Because these are symlinks (which the script doesn't follow), the permissions it detects aren't the actual permissions. The 'fix' is not to emit the warnings for this. You can ignore them. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 885852] Re: package python-psycopg2 2.2.1-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus nouveau script pre-removal a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1

2017-08-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
Bug in obsolete python helper: File "/usr/share/pycentral-data/pyversions.py", line 172, in default_version ** Changed in: psycopg2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 848566] Re: package python-psycopg2 2.2.1-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2017-08-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
Bug in obsolete python helper (pycentral). ** Changed in: psycopg2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848566 Title: package python-psycopg2

[Bug 1650064] Re: package python-psycopg2 2.6.1-1build2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2017-08-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
** Package changed: psycopg2 (Ubuntu) => egenix-mx-base (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1650064 Title: package python-psycopg2 2.6.1-1build2 failed to install/upgrade:

[Bug 1700964] Re: package python-psycopg2 2.6.1-1build2 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script pre-removal instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 1

2017-08-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
** Package changed: psycopg2 (Ubuntu) => python-defaults (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1700964 Title: package python-psycopg2 2.6.1-1build2 failed to install/upgrade: sub-

[Bug 1706480] Re: package postfix 3.1.0-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75

2017-07-25 Thread Scott Kitterman
>From the terminal log: newaliases: fatal: file /etc/postfix/main.cf: parameter mail_owner: user postfix has same user ID as pulse This is a local configuration issue and not a package bug. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1695758] Re: package python-prompt-toolkit 1.0.9-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2017-06-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pycompile", line 35, in from debpython.version import SUPPORTED, debsorted, vrepr, \ File "/usr/share/python/debpython/version.py", line 24, in from ConfigParser import SafeConfigParser ImportError: No module named 'ConfigParser' **

[Bug 1591706] Re: postfix is vulnerable to "Secure Client-Initiated Renegotiation" DoS according to testssl

2017-06-09 Thread Scott Kitterman
Based on the report against the test tool, unless this issue is validated with the current version of the tool released in May 2017, it's a false positive. It's not clear there's any kind of bug at all. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Critical => Undecided ** Changed in: postfix

Re: [Bug 1519331] Re: Postfix cannot resolve DNS if network was unavailable when it was started, such as on a laptop

2017-05-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, May 15, 2017 08:49:42 PM you wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 06:45:21PM -0000, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I'm getting close to uploading a fix for this to Debian, so you might wait > > for that. > > It looks like you've implemented this using the network-onl

Re: [Bug 1519331] Re: Postfix cannot resolve DNS if network was unavailable when it was started, such as on a laptop

2017-05-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
I'm getting close to uploading a fix for this to Debian, so you might wait for that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1519331 Title: Postfix cannot resolve DNS if network was

[Bug 1318324] Re: Python-Bleach in trusty is broken

2017-03-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
Still an issue in Trusty, but fixed in the current release. ** Also affects: python-bleach (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: python-bleach (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: python-bleach (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed =>

[Bug 1657445] Re: opendmarc.service inadequate, /etc/default/opendmarc not installed

2017-03-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
I've just uploaded an update to Debian that updates README.Debian (which I neglected to do when adding the service file) that explains how to handle things in lieu of using /etc/defaults, which is apparently not a very systemd thing to do. ** Changed in: opendmarc (Ubuntu) Status: New =>

[Bug 1661831] Re: package postfix 3.1.0-3 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting a removal

2017-02-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
Unfortunately there isn't enough information here to make the bug actionable. We need to know how it got in an inconsistent state. Please check /var/log/apt/term.log (or possibly older term.log.* files) for postfix installation or upgrade errors and add that information to the bug. ** Changed

Re: [Bug 1519331] Re: Postfix cannot resolve DNS if network was unavailable when it was started, such as on a laptop

2017-01-30 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, January 30, 2017 09:33:36 PM you wrote: > Which package was updated to fix this problem in Zesty? I could try to > upgrade it only (I'm not ready to upgrade the whole distro). postfix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1519331] Re: Postfix cannot resolve DNS if network was unavailable when it was started, such as on a laptop

2017-01-20 Thread Scott Kitterman
It would be nice if someone who is having this problem could test 3.1.4-2 or later on Zesty to see if the problem is fixed (I think it is). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1519331

Re: [Bug 1656931] Re: Security update for pdns-recursor on trusty

2017-01-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
Debian LTS uploaded essentially the same patch (we coordinated and reviewed what each other had done). I'm not sure what to tell you about testing other than that we have the change in production on a high volume system and haven't seen any issues. I'm no longer involved in Ubuntu

[Bug 1656931] Re: Security update for pdns-recursor on trusty

2017-01-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
debian/changelog will need the revision number adjusted to whatever you prefer and the bug number added. ** Also affects: pdns-recursor (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: pdns-recursor (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: pdns-recursor

[Bug 1656931] [NEW] Security update for pdns-recursor on trusty

2017-01-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Note: We have this package running in production without any apparent issues. * SECURITY UPDATE: * References * CVE-2014-8601: PowerDNS Recursor before 3.6.2 does not limit delegation chaining, which allows

[Bug 1548594] Re: Convert test suite to python 3.0

2017-01-12 Thread Scott Kitterman
It would have been trivial to look at test-postfix.py and see it still starts with "#!/usr/bin/python". No it's not fixed. Please don't randomly change bug status. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete =>

[Bug 1649453] Re: systemd starts postfix before resolver

2017-01-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
Now that the upload I had pending is done, I did look into this a bit further. By adding the After=network-online.target override, when I look at the output of systemd-analyze critical-chain with and without an equivalent Wants= postfix is starting after network-online.target. I didn't look

[Bug 1595096] Re: cannot create multi postfix instance by postmulti command

2017-01-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
I've verified this works on the latest Debian upload and documented the Debian (and Ubuntu) differences here: https://git.launchpad.net/postfix/tree/debian/README.Debian?h=stable/v3.1=3d459e01fb9bc7dde304d4c505850e7552cc9491 (that's shipped in the package once you get the right version) **

Re: [Bug 1654453] Re: LMTP delivery to Dovecot stops working in 3.1.4-1

2017-01-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, January 06, 2017 05:30:12 PM you wrote: > No, there is no trailing whitespace on any of the lines related to lmtp > in either of my configuration files. The regex is improved in 3.1.4-2, so please check again once you've upgraded to that version. Scott K -- You received this bug

[Bug 1654453] Re: LMTP delivery to Dovecot stops working in 3.1.4-1

2017-01-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654453 Title: LMTP delivery to Dovecot stops working in 3.1.4-1 To manage

Re: [Bug 1654453] [NEW] LMTP delivery to Dovecot stops working in 3.1.4-1

2017-01-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, January 06, 2017 01:04:21 AM you wrote: What does the line for dovecot-lmtp in master.cf look like? Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654453 Title: LMTP delivery

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >