[Bug 1912032] Re: Nvidia-340 fails to build during Focal install due to upgrade to 5.8 kernel

2021-01-15 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello Erick, note that the release notes say:

"Ubuntu Desktop flavour now always tracks HWE kernel (hardware
enablement). It means that from 20.04.2 release Ubuntu Desktop will gain
new major kernel versions every 6 months through to summer of 2022."
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FocalFossa/ReleaseNotes

You can of course still run the release kernel if you wish, I believe
the following command should switch you back to the original release
kernel:

sudo apt-get install --install-recommends linux-generic-hwe-20.04-
linux-generic

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912032

Title:
  Nvidia-340 fails to build during Focal install due to upgrade to 5.8
  kernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta-hwe-5.8/+bug/1912032/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910576] Re: [MIR] libbpf (dependency of iproute2)

2021-01-14 Thread Seth Arnold
Thanks Christian, I think you're right, this probably doesn't need a
security review and being centralized in one place will probably be
easier to maintain.

Thanks

** Changed in: libbpf (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Changed in: libbpf (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Seth Arnold (seth-arnold) => (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910576

Title:
  [MIR] libbpf (dependency of iproute2)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1910576/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1911836] Re: package linux-image-5.4.0-62-generic 5.4.0-62.70 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

2021-01-14 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello, I think the core of your problem is this:

Error 24 : Write error : cannot write compressed block

Caused by a full /boot:

/dev/sda2  483946424596 34365  93% /boot


Truncate a few older files in /boot (start a shell via sudo -s, then find files 
with ls -l, then use `> vmlinux-whatever` to truncate files from an old kernel).

Once you've truncated a kernel and symbols file, you probably have
enough disk space free to run:

sudo apt install -f
sudo apt autoremove

Thanks

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1911836

Title:
  package linux-image-5.4.0-62-generic 5.4.0-62.70 failed to
  install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools
  exited with return code 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1911836/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1911374] Re: can we demote anope to universe?

2021-01-14 Thread Seth Arnold
Thanks seb128, this is my first launchpad git merge request, and first
time working with the seeds, so please let me know if I got anything
incorrect.

Thanks

** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~seth-arnold/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu-seeds/+merge/396361

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1911374

Title:
  can we demote anope to universe?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/anope/+bug/1911374/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1911374] [NEW] can we demote anope to universe?

2021-01-12 Thread Seth Arnold
Public bug reported:

Hello, anope is in main in several releases:

Ubuntu packages:

xenial: 2.0.3-1build2, Pocket: release, Component: universe
bionic: 2.0.4-2, Pocket: release, Component: universe
focal: 2.0.6-1build3, Pocket: release, Component: main
groovy: 2.0.7-1, Pocket: release, Component: main
hirsute: 2.0.9-1, Pocket: release, Component: main


Given that Canonical no longer uses IRC for communication, does it still make 
sense to keep an IRC services package in main?

The MIR for anope:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/anope/+bug/1459692

Thanks

** Affects: anope (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1911374

Title:
  can we demote anope to universe?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/anope/+bug/1911374/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910611] Re: sssd startup fails when apparmor in enforcing mode

2021-01-08 Thread Seth Arnold
Great, thanks Richard!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910611

Title:
  sssd startup fails when apparmor in enforcing mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1910611/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910611] Re: sssd startup fails when apparmor in enforcing mode

2021-01-07 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello Richard, it looks like the profile may not have kept up with
changes in the packaging.

The profile has probably been broken ever since:

sssd (2.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream release.
  * control: Bump policy to 4.4.0.
  * control, compat, rules: Bump debhelper to 12.
  * *.install: Updated, some files moved to /usr/libexec.

 -- Timo Aaltonen   Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:14:09 +0300

Please try adding this line:

  /usr/libexec/sssd/* rmix,

to the file:

/etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.sssd

Then, try:

sudo apparmor_parser --replace /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.sssd
sudo systemctl restart sssd

Please report back how well this works.

Thanks

** Also affects: sssd (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910611

Title:
  sssd startup fails when apparmor in enforcing mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1910611/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908836] Re: checkinstall leaves root filesystem unusable if interrupted

2020-12-22 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello, can you please elaborate on what happened? Thanks

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security

** Changed in: checkinstall (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908836

Title:
  checkinstall leaves root filesystem unusable if interrupted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkinstall/+bug/1908836/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908868] Re: a hot room in my father's home

2020-12-22 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908868

Title:
  a hot room in my father's home

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1908868/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908915] Re: package chromium-browser 1:85.0.4183.83-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: new chromium-browser package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10

2020-12-22 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello mohsen, probably this can get you moving again:

sudo apt update
sudo apt install -f
sudo apt upgrade

Thanks

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908915

Title:
  package chromium-browser 1:85.0.4183.83-0ubuntu2 failed to
  install/upgrade: new chromium-browser package pre-installation script
  subprocess returned error exit status 10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1908915/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908768] Re: TouchPad don't response

2020-12-22 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908768

Title:
  TouchPad don't response

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1908768/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908795] Re: xrdp needs to be in ssl-cert group to read server private key

2020-12-22 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908795

Title:
  xrdp needs to be in ssl-cert group to read server private key

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xrdp/+bug/1908795/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908829] Re: package linux-headers-5.4.0-58 5.4.0-58.64 failed to install/upgrade: unable to create new file '/var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-headers-5.4.0-58.list-new': Operation not permitted

2020-12-22 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello, was this perhaps within a container that might have just had the
host filesystem passed in without write access?

Thanks

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908829

Title:
  package linux-headers-5.4.0-58 5.4.0-58.64 failed to install/upgrade:
  unable to create new file '/var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-headers-5.4.0-58
  .list-new': Operation not permitted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1908829/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908719] Re: "installation crashed" while installation was about to finish.

2020-12-22 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello, I'm not sure of the cause of your installation problem, but I did
see firmware errors in the logs, as well as the windows filesystem
wasn't cleanly unmounted. It might be worth installing BIOS updates from
Acer, if any are available, and perhaps also using a 'restart' with
windows, and not letting it get past the bios. (Windows 'shutdown'
apparently isn't an actual shutdown these days.)

I hope this helps. Thanks

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908719

Title:
  "installation crashed"  while installation was about to finish.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1908719/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908733] Re: CVE-2020-1971 OpenSSL package upgrade issue

2020-12-22 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello, you've replaced the Ubuntu OpenSSL packages with Ondrej's OpenSSL
packages. You can ask him if he has performed the corresponding update
yet: https://github.com/oerdnj/deb.sury.org

Thanks

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security

** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908733

Title:
  CVE-2020-1971 OpenSSL package upgrade issue

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1908733/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908631] Re: Ubuntu 20.04 não consegue terminar a instalação

2020-12-22 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908631

Title:
  Ubuntu 20.04 não consegue terminar a instalação

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1908631/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908346] Re: grub boot-load crashed during ubuntu 18.04 installtion

2020-12-16 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908346

Title:
  grub boot-load crashed during ubuntu 18.04 installtion

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1908346/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1907984] Re: Wifi and ethernet not working anymore since 5.4.0-54

2020-12-16 Thread Seth Arnold
Hopefully helpful, hopefully this isn't a red herring, but it sure seems
suspicious timing:

[  113.249890] rfkill: input handler disabled
[  242.742392] INFO: task kworker/u16:3:110 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[  242.742399]   Not tainted 5.4.0-58-generic #64-Ubuntu
[  242.742401] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this 
message.
[  242.742404] kworker/u16:3   D0   110  2 0x80004000
[  242.742451] Workqueue: events_power_efficient reg_check_chans_work [cfg80211]
[  242.742454] Call Trace:
[  242.742465]  __schedule+0x2e3/0x740
[  242.742472]  ? __update_load_avg_cfs_rq+0x212/0x2f0
[  242.742476]  schedule+0x42/0xb0
[  242.742480]  schedule_preempt_disabled+0xe/0x10
[  242.742484]  __mutex_lock.isra.0+0x182/0x4f0
[  242.742490]  __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x13/0x20
[  242.742493]  mutex_lock+0x2e/0x40
[  242.742498]  rtnl_lock+0x15/0x20
[  242.742526]  reg_check_chans_work+0x2f/0x3b0 [cfg80211]
[  242.742533]  process_one_work+0x1eb/0x3b0
[  242.742537]  worker_thread+0x4d/0x400
[  242.742541]  kthread+0x104/0x140
[  242.742544]  ? process_one_work+0x3b0/0x3b0
[  242.742547]  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
[  242.742551]  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Released => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907984

Title:
  Wifi and ethernet not working anymore since 5.4.0-54

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1907984/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908325] Re: error de instalacion de grub

2020-12-15 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908325

Title:
  error de instalacion de grub

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1908325/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908184] Re: package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.22-0ubuntu0.20.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2020-12-15 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908184

Title:
  package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.22-0ubuntu0.20.04.3 failed to
  install/upgrade: installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation
  script subprocess returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/1908184/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908095] Re: /etc/openfortivpn/config is world readable but might contain passwords

2020-12-14 Thread Seth Arnold
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. Since the package referred to in this bug is in universe or
multiverse, it is community maintained. If you are able, I suggest
coordinating with Debian and posting a debdiff for this issue. When a
debdiff is available, members of the security team will review it and
publish the package. See the following link for more information:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdateProcedures

** Changed in: openfortivpn (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Tags added: community-security

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908095

Title:
  /etc/openfortivpn/config is world readable but might contain passwords

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openfortivpn/+bug/1908095/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908073] Re: package python3 3.8.2-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: new python3 package pre-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 127

2020-12-14 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908073

Title:
  package python3 3.8.2-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: new python3
  package pre-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 127

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults/+bug/1908073/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1907937] Re: [Ubuntu 20.04 LTS on Lenovo 9i Yoga] Not detecting touch pad, sound card, touch screen stylus or brightness controls

2020-12-14 Thread Seth Arnold
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug.  I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy.
Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

** Information type changed from Public Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907937

Title:
  [Ubuntu 20.04 LTS on Lenovo 9i Yoga] Not detecting touch pad, sound
  card, touch screen stylus or brightness controls

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1907937/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1907903] Re: like 4 or 5 times i have gotten a crash messed up my kernals and system this is ridicoulous

2020-12-14 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello Danny, it appears your clock is at least a year out of date. Try
the installation again with the clock set to the correct time and date
and see if that helps.

I saw errors having to do with safe-browse or something similar. You may
need to disable that, too, perhaps it's identified one of the third
party software sources as supplying malware.

If neither of these help you may need to contact whoever prepared the
CAINE builds that you're using for further help.

Thanks

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907903

Title:
  like 4 or 5 times i have gotten a crash messed up my kernals and
  system this is ridicoulous

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1907903/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1907905] Re: buging

2020-12-14 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907905

Title:
  buging

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1907905/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1907934] Re: se escucha una voz todo el tiempoy nombra todo

2020-12-14 Thread Seth Arnold
This sounds a little bit like you may have accidentally enabled an
accessibility feature. I hope this helps.

Thanks

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907934

Title:
  se escucha una voz todo el tiempoy nombra todo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1907934/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1907852] Re: package libnvidia-gl-455 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: new libnvidia-gl-455:i386 package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 2

2020-12-14 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello Sanjay, from your logs:

diversion of /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1 to /usr/lib/i386-linux-
gnu/libGL.so.1.distrib by nvidia-340

I don't know nvidia drivers well, but this looks a bit like an older
driver is still installed while trying to install a new one. Does this
sound familiar?

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907852

Title:
  package libnvidia-gl-455 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
  new libnvidia-gl-455:i386 package pre-installation script subprocess
  returned error exit status 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-455/+bug/1907852/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1907852] Re: package libnvidia-gl-455 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: new libnvidia-gl-455:i386 package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 2

2020-12-14 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907852

Title:
  package libnvidia-gl-455 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
  new libnvidia-gl-455:i386 package pre-installation script subprocess
  returned error exit status 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-455/+bug/1907852/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1906474] Re: phpldapadmin 1.2.5 vulnerable to stored cross site scripting

2020-12-10 Thread Seth Arnold
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 08:22:07PM -, Andy Gu wrote:
> Hi @Seth-arnold! Do you know if a CVE has been assigned for this ticket,
> if applicable?

Thanks for the reminder.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906474

Title:
  phpldapadmin 1.2.5 vulnerable to stored cross site scripting

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phpldapadmin/+bug/1906474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891934] Re: [MIR] google-osconfig-agent

2020-12-10 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello Igor, the security team has not forgotten this. Thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891934

Title:
  [MIR] google-osconfig-agent

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-osconfig-agent/+bug/1891934/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1466150] Re: grub-install breaks when ESP is on raid

2020-12-07 Thread Seth Arnold
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 06:05:29PM -, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> I've just tested this and it works as described.
> 
> However, grub-efi-amd64 wasn't installed on my freshly installed 20.04
> Ubuntu system.
> 
> Installed was grub-efi-amd64-signed.
> 
> And 'dpkg-reconfigure grub-efi-amd64-signed' didn't prompt for anything!
> 
> So, I installed grub-efi-amd64 and removed grub-efi-amd64-signed for the
> test.

I believe the preferred approach (for focal and newer?) is for
grub-efi-amd64-signed and grub-pc to be installed everywhere, and grub-pc
then 'owns' the debconf questions.

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1466150

Title:
  grub-install breaks when ESP is on raid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1466150/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1906642] Re: Xorg crash

2020-12-03 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906642

Title:
  Xorg crash

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1906642/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1906609] Re: Mozilla Thunderbird SMTP Server Stack-Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

2020-12-03 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security

** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906609

Title:
  Mozilla Thunderbird SMTP Server Stack-Based Buffer Overflow
  Vulnerability

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1906609/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1861235] Re: zfs recv PANIC at range_tree.c:304:range_tree_find_impl()

2020-12-03 Thread Seth Arnold
My guess is the next step is trying the zfs send | ssh zfs recv commands
that were causing the VERIFY(size != 0) failed message with traces. I've
always been uneasy with the 'main' error coming only with a recv
operation, relying upon two systems to recreate a bug is iffy at best.
And since it wedges the one, I don't like doing it just for fun, but I'd
also like to get to the bottom of this.

Is there anything else to try first?

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861235

Title:
  zfs recv PANIC at range_tree.c:304:range_tree_find_impl()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1861235/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1861235] Re: zfs recv PANIC at range_tree.c:304:range_tree_find_impl()

2020-12-03 Thread Seth Arnold
The scrub has finished, no new errors in zpool status -v, dmesg is
filled with debugging messages, I hope something is useful. :)

Thanks

$ uname -a
Linux wopr 4.15.0-126-generic #129-Ubuntu SMP Mon Nov 23 18:53:38 UTC 2020 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ modinfo zfs | grep -i version
version:0.7.5-1ubuntu16.10+lp1861235
srcversion: 62D1F1B1A1EE81EB3AA8ABA
$ zpool status -v
  pool: fst
 state: ONLINE
  scan: scrub repaired 0B in 2h37m with 0 errors on Sun Nov  8 03:01:53 2020
config:

NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
fst ONLINE   0 0 0
  raidz1-0  ONLINE   0 0 0
wwn-0x5002538e4095da39  ONLINE   0 0 0
wwn-0x5002538e4095bdd6  ONLINE   0 0 0
wwn-0x5002538e4093c6fd  ONLINE   0 0 0
wwn-0x5002538e4095da30  ONLINE   0 0 0

errors: No known data errors

  pool: srv
 state: ONLINE
  scan: scrub repaired 0B in 4h12m with 0 errors on Wed Dec  2 18:53:44 2020
config:

NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
srv  ONLINE   0 0 0
  mirror-0   ONLINE   0 0 0
ata-HGST_HUS724030ALA640_PN2234P8KTWJYY  ONLINE   0 0 0
ata-HGST_HUS724030ALA640_PN2234P9G620TW  ONLINE   0 0 0
ata-HGST_HUS724030ALA640_PN2234P9G66E2U  ONLINE   0 0 0
  mirror-1   ONLINE   0 0 0
ata-HGST_HUS724030ALA640_PN2234P9G69TKU  ONLINE   0 0 0
ata-HGST_HUS724030ALA640_PN2234P9G69TXU  ONLINE   0 0 0
ata-HGST_HUS724030ALA640_PN2234P9G69U2U  ONLINE   0 0 0
  mirror-2   ONLINE   0 0 0
ata-HGST_HUS724030ALA640_PN2234P9G6EBUU  ONLINE   0 0 0
ata-HGST_HUS724030ALA640_PN2234P9G6ESAU  ONLINE   0 0 0
ata-HGST_HUS724030ALA640_PN2234P9G6G70U  ONLINE   0 0 0
logs
  nvme0n1p1  ONLINE   0 0 0
cache
  nvme0n1p2  ONLINE   0 0 0

errors: No known data errors


** Attachment added: "journalctl -b output"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1861235/+attachment/5440572/+files/journalctl-b

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861235

Title:
  zfs recv PANIC at range_tree.c:304:range_tree_find_impl()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1861235/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1861235] Re: zfs recv PANIC at range_tree.c:304:range_tree_find_impl()

2020-12-02 Thread Seth Arnold
Here's smartctl output on the disks in the pool. It's a bit hard to
summarize nine drives of smartctl output but nothing stood out as
interesting to me.

My journals only go back a few months so they wouldn't show any IO
errors at the time of this problem being introduced, but this currently
gives no results:

journalctl | grep -i "i/o error"

so there's nothing recent.

I started a new scrub, it'll finish in a few hours, if I forget to post
results please do remind me. :)

Thanks

** Attachment added: "smartctl"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1861235/+attachment/5440418/+files/smartctl

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861235

Title:
  zfs recv PANIC at range_tree.c:304:range_tree_find_impl()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1861235/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1861235] Re: zfs recv PANIC at range_tree.c:304:range_tree_find_impl()

2020-12-02 Thread Seth Arnold
Picking the previous bad object (which I'm pretty sure should still be
intact):

$ modinfo zfs | grep ^version
version:0.7.5-1ubuntu16.10+lp1861235
$ uname -a
Linux wopr 4.15.0-126-generic #129-Ubuntu SMP Mon Nov 23 18:53:38 UTC 2020 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ sudo zdb - srv/backups/millbarge/rpool/var/log 529
Dataset srv/backups/millbarge/rpool/var/log [ZPL], ID 39694, cr_txg 23197757, 
554M, 274 objects, rootbp DVA[0]=<1:1d000d42000:1000> 
DVA[1]=<2:24416f4b000:1000> [L0 DMU objset] sha256 uncompressed LE contiguous 
unique double size=800L/800P birth=23437543L/23437543P fill=274 
cksum=cf5fcb2f986c768c:7cc8638aeb1a5162:9de9f236f072e16:40c6a08d90b54951

Object  lvl   iblk   dblk  dsize  dnsize  lsize   %full  type
dn->dn_nblkptr >= 1 (0x0 >= 0x1)
ASSERT at ../../module/zfs/dnode.c:278:dnode_verify()Aborted
$ dmesg | tail
[   43.017302] Ebtables v2.0 registered
[   44.977437] L1TF CPU bug present and SMT on, data leak possible. See 
CVE-2018-3646 and 
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/hw-vuln/l1tf.html for 
details.
[   47.047114] bridge: filtering via arp/ip/ip6tables is no longer available by 
default. Update your scripts to load br_netfilter if you need this.
[   47.047966] virbr0: port 1(virbr0-nic) entered blocking state
[   47.047968] virbr0: port 1(virbr0-nic) entered disabled state
[   47.048063] device virbr0-nic entered promiscuous mode
[   47.433533] nf_conntrack version 0.5.0 (65536 buckets, 262144 max)
[   47.971009] virbr0: port 1(virbr0-nic) entered blocking state
[   47.971013] virbr0: port 1(virbr0-nic) entered listening state
[   48.321853] virbr0: port 1(virbr0-nic) entered disabled state
$ 


** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2018-3646

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861235

Title:
  zfs recv PANIC at range_tree.c:304:range_tree_find_impl()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1861235/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1861235] Re: zfs recv PANIC at range_tree.c:304:range_tree_find_impl()

2020-12-02 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello Andrea, thanks for looking into my problem.

# zpool status -v
  pool: fst
 state: ONLINE
  scan: scrub repaired 0B in 2h37m with 0 errors on Sun Nov  8 03:01:53 2020
config:

NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
fst ONLINE   0 0 0
  raidz1-0  ONLINE   0 0 0
wwn-0x5002538e4095da39  ONLINE   0 0 0
wwn-0x5002538e4095bdd6  ONLINE   0 0 0
wwn-0x5002538e4093c6fd  ONLINE   0 0 0
wwn-0x5002538e4095da30  ONLINE   0 0 0

errors: No known data errors

  pool: srv
 state: ONLINE
  scan: scrub repaired 0B in 3h44m with 0 errors on Sun Nov  8 04:08:16 2020
config:

NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
srv  ONLINE   0 0 0
  mirror-0   ONLINE   0 0 0
ata-HGST_HUS724030ALA640_PN2234P8KTWJYY  ONLINE   0 0 0
ata-HGST_HUS724030ALA640_PN2234P9G620TW  ONLINE   0 0 0
ata-HGST_HUS724030ALA640_PN2234P9G66E2U  ONLINE   0 0 0
  mirror-1   ONLINE   0 0 0
ata-HGST_HUS724030ALA640_PN2234P9G69TKU  ONLINE   0 0 0
ata-HGST_HUS724030ALA640_PN2234P9G69TXU  ONLINE   0 0 0
ata-HGST_HUS724030ALA640_PN2234P9G69U2U  ONLINE   0 0 0
  mirror-2   ONLINE   0 0 0
ata-HGST_HUS724030ALA640_PN2234P9G6EBUU  ONLINE   0 0 0
ata-HGST_HUS724030ALA640_PN2234P9G6ESAU  ONLINE   0 0 0
ata-HGST_HUS724030ALA640_PN2234P9G6G70U  ONLINE   0 0 0
logs
  nvme0n1p1  ONLINE   0 0 0
cache
  nvme0n1p2  ONLINE   0 0 0

errors: No known data errors

I'll swap over to your dkms build and report back.

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861235

Title:
  zfs recv PANIC at range_tree.c:304:range_tree_find_impl()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1861235/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1906474] Re: phpldapadmin 1.2.5 vulnerable to stored cross site scripting

2020-12-02 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security

** Changed in: phpldapadmin (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906474

Title:
  phpldapadmin 1.2.5 vulnerable to stored cross site scripting

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phpldapadmin/+bug/1906474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1868517] Re: Stray /usr/.crates2.json file

2020-12-02 Thread Seth Arnold
This still appears to be an issue on focal:

± apt-file search '/usr/.crates2.json'
bat: /usr/.crates2.json   
cbindgen: /usr/.crates2.json
difference: /usr/.crates2.json
hexyl: /usr/.crates2.json
lalrpop: /usr/.crates2.json
lscolors: /usr/.crates2.json
nitrocli: /usr/.crates2.json
pulldown-cmark: /usr/.crates2.json
ripgrep: /usr/.crates2.json
rustdoc-stripper: /usr/.crates2.json
rusty-tags: /usr/.crates2.json
ucd-generate: /usr/.crates2.json
xml-rs: /usr/.crates2.json

Does apt-file work with updates or just what's in a release pocket?

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868517

Title:
  Stray /usr/.crates2.json file

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cargo/+bug/1868517/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1897369] Re: apparmor: Allow cups-browsed to change nice value (CAP_SYS_NICE)

2020-12-01 Thread Seth Arnold
It may also be an option to set the desired scheduling parameters via
systemd.exec(5) parameters instead of asking the daemon to do the
changes itself.

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897369

Title:
  apparmor: Allow cups-browsed to change nice value (CAP_SYS_NICE)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1897369/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1466150] Re: grub-install breaks when ESP is on raid

2020-11-30 Thread Seth Arnold
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 05:38:10PM -, John Robinson wrote:
> If the user knows she's building her ESP on RAID, she probably knows
> enough not to be writing to the RAID's constituent devices
> independently.

Given how many broken grub configurations there are in the world that
come out of the woodwork when we do grub package updates, we shouldn't
automatically assume users know what they're doing. They're often
following (bad) advice they found online without understanding the
consequences of what they did.

The tooling now making it easy to install to multiple partitions is a
definite improvement over the previous state.

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1466150

Title:
  grub-install breaks when ESP is on raid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1466150/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1906115] Re: ubuntu dont install cause error or bug

2020-11-30 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906115

Title:
  ubuntu dont install cause error or bug

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1906115/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1906111] Re: package grub-legacy-ec2 1:1 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-legacy-ec2 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10

2020-11-30 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906111

Title:
  package grub-legacy-ec2 1:1 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-
  legacy-ec2 package post-installation script subprocess returned error
  exit status 10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-legacy-ec2/+bug/1906111/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1906083] Re: grub installer failed fatal error

2020-11-30 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906083

Title:
  grub installer failed fatal error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1906083/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1905758] Re: package libglib2.0-0:i386 2.66.1-2 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving triggers unprocessed

2020-11-30 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905758

Title:
  package libglib2.0-0:i386 2.66.1-2 failed to install/upgrade:
  dependency problems - leaving triggers unprocessed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1905758/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1905480] Re: shutter lists private files in log

2020-11-30 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905480

Title:
  shutter lists  private files in log

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shutter/+bug/1905480/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1905534] Re: upgrade to ubuntu 20 fails

2020-11-25 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905534

Title:
  upgrade to ubuntu 20 fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1905534/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1905150] Re: package linux-image-5.4.0-55-generic 5.4.0-55.61 failed to install/upgrade: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote linux-image-5.4.0-55-generic, o script pre-removal retornou erro do sta

2020-11-25 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905150

Title:
  package linux-image-5.4.0-55-generic 5.4.0-55.61 failed to
  install/upgrade: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote linux-
  image-5.4.0-55-generic, o script pre-removal retornou erro do status
  de saída 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1905150/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1905209] Re: gnome-screensaver is blocked by an application to lock screen

2020-11-25 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905209

Title:
  gnome-screensaver is blocked by an application to lock screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/1905209/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1905236] Re: Linux version 4.15.0-72-generic: [Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt]

2020-11-25 Thread Seth Arnold
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug.  I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy.
Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905236

Title:
  Linux version 4.15.0-72-generic: [Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal
  exception in interrupt]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1905236/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1905353] Re: bug package

2020-11-25 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905353

Title:
  bug package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1905353/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1905367] Re: Unable to upgrade ubuntu to 20

2020-11-25 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905367

Title:
  Unable to upgrade ubuntu to 20

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1905367/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1905130] Re: shutdown and reboot/restart didn't work after updating Ubuntu to Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS

2020-11-25 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello Moner, this may need to be reported to the virtualbox community, I
don't have any suggestions off-hand.

Thanks

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905130

Title:
  shutdown and reboot/restart didn't work after updating Ubuntu to
  Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox-ext-pack/+bug/1905130/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1905114] Re: Lenovo System Firmware update will not download or install and Impress 7.0 crashes

2020-11-25 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello Lillian, I suggest running the firmware update tool by hand to see
if there's more information available there:

sudo fwupdmgr update

I'm not sure what to suggest for libreoffice; perhaps
https://askubuntu.com/ would be a place to get more advice on how to
work with imports or exports to other formats.

Thanks

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905114

Title:
  Lenovo System Firmware update will not download or install and Impress
  7.0 crashes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1905114/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1905137] Re: package snort 2.9.7.0-5build1 failed to install/upgrade: installed snort package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2020-11-25 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello, I noticed in your dmesg this line:

[1.049067] r8169 :02:00.0 eno1: renamed from eth0

perhaps you just need to give the nic 'eno1' when the snort debconf
prompts you for which nic to listen to?

Thanks

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

** Changed in: snort (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905137

Title:
  package snort 2.9.7.0-5build1 failed to install/upgrade: installed
  snort package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snort/+bug/1905137/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1905285] Re: socket-activated sshd breaks on concurrent connections

2020-11-23 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello Marcin, the Description section of
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.unit.html gives
information on how to modify configurations without having them undone
by future updates; the systemctl edit command automates the process of
using these local modifications.

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905285

Title:
  socket-activated sshd breaks on concurrent connections

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1905285/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1904797] Re: geoipupdate fails with 40` HTML error

2020-11-18 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello Robert,

Hopefully helpful: "Note that for geoipupdate versions less than 2.5.0,
use UserId instead of AccountID and ProductIds instead of EditionIDs."

https://dev.maxmind.com/geoip/geoipupdate/

Was this working on a previous version and need to be changed to reflect
the new names of parameters in the new version?

Thanks

** Information type changed from Public Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904797

Title:
  geoipupdate fails with 40` HTML error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/geoipupdate/+bug/1904797/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1841547] Re: command injection in vfdecrypt

2020-11-13 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841547

Title:
  command injection in vfdecrypt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmg2img/+bug/1841547/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1900314] Re: Privilege escalation using vulnerabilities in gdm3 and accountsservice (GHSL-2020-187, GHSL-2020-188, GHSL-2020-202)

2020-11-09 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900314

Title:
  Privilege escalation using vulnerabilities in gdm3 and accountsservice
  (GHSL-2020-187, GHSL-2020-188, GHSL-2020-202)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1900314/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1902918] Re: GDM crashes after upgrade to 20.10 due to apparmor and snap

2020-11-04 Thread Seth Arnold
A user in #ubuntu reported something similar:

https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/11/04/%23ubuntu.html#t01:11

Wed 04 01:07:21 < signofzeta> that aside, i have a question.  whenever I open 
the official Discord app (a snap, 
  if that matters), I'm immediately logged out.  
what would cause that?
Wed 04 01:08:12 < spelter> signofzeta: what ubuntu version?
Wed 04 01:08:37 < spelter> signofzeta: also, snaps are a hit-or-miss kinda 
thing imho. "oh snap!" *rimshot*
Wed 04 01:08:46 < signofzeta> spelter: 20.04.1 LTS, fully updated, kernel 
5.4.0-52
Wed 04 01:09:23 < signofzeta> yeah, I know snaps can snap at you, but this is 
new.  just started today.  may or 
  may not be related to me installing amdgpu 
drivers from AMD, not sure.  i can't 
  read the debugging output because i'm logged off.
Wed 04 01:09:56 < spelter> signofzeta: yeah you should defo see what it's doing 
by running it from cli
Wed 04 01:10:19 < signofzeta> tried it, spelter. it logged me out so fast i 
couldn't read the output.
Wed 04 01:11:51 < signofzeta> I type "discord" in a terminal (or click the 
icon), then i'm immediately back at 
  the logon screen.
Wed 04 01:12:28 < signofzeta> yeah, just like that.  let me check journalctl 
for anything interesting. i haven't 
  had time to troubleshoot yet.
Wed 04 01:14:00 < signofzeta> journalctl has nothing for discord. some AppArmor 
stuff about the Ubuntu Store, but 
  nothing damning.

[..]

Wed 04 01:25:04 < signofzeta> Here's the full line:  udit: type=1326 
audit(1604451812.515:22787): auid=1000 
  uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=34999 comm="Discord" 
  exe="/snap/discord/115/usr/share/discord/Discord" 
sig=0 arch=c03e syscall=203 
  compat=0 ip=0x7f262b995b9f code=0x5


Perhaps it's unrelated, in which case, apologies, but it felt similar.

Thanks

** Package changed: snap (Ubuntu) => snapd (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902918

Title:
  GDM crashes after upgrade to 20.10 due to apparmor and snap

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1902918/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1897287] Re: Argument Injection leads to Local Privilege Escalation

2020-10-28 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello Vaisha, very nice writeup, thanks :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897287

Title:
  Argument Injection leads to Local Privilege Escalation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blueman/+bug/1897287/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891721] Re: grub-multi-install attempts to mount a non-existing device after migrating to another system

2020-10-28 Thread Seth Arnold
Probably running sudo dpkg-reconfigure grub-efi-amd64 would do the
trick.

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891721

Title:
  grub-multi-install attempts to mount a non-existing device after
  migrating to another system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1891721/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1814983] Re: zfs poor sustained read performance from ssd pool

2020-10-27 Thread Seth Arnold
Hi Colin, thanks so much for giving this another look. I don't see any
references to trying different zfs_arc_meta_limit* settings here!

I raised zfs_arc_meta_limit_percent from the default 75 to 95 and my
system has been running this ripgrep for four hours without falling to
pieces.

I think we can declare success on this one!

Thanks

# grep . /sys/module/zfs/parameters/zfs_arc_{dnode,meta}_limit*
/sys/module/zfs/parameters/zfs_arc_dnode_limit:0
/sys/module/zfs/parameters/zfs_arc_dnode_limit_percent:50
/sys/module/zfs/parameters/zfs_arc_meta_limit:0
/sys/module/zfs/parameters/zfs_arc_meta_limit_percent:95

   7.97%  [kernel] [k] SHA256TransformBlocks
   3.33%  [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_lock
   2.59%  [kernel] [k] arc_evict_state
   2.39%  [kernel] [k] mutex_lock
   2.08%  [kernel] [k] osq_lock

  PID USER  PR  NIVIRTRESSHR S  %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 
 
28555 sarnold   20   0 28.648g 0.023t   2160 S 262.8 18.8 546:39.58 rg  
 
 1567 root  20   0   0  0  0 R  71.4  0.0   1200:10 arc_reclaim 
 
2 root  20   0   0  0  0 R  23.7  0.0 238:17.77 kthreadd
 
 1966 root   0 -20   0  0  0 D  11.2  0.0 163:24.49 z_rd_int_2  
 
 1967 root   0 -20   0  0  0 S  11.2  0.0 163:25.54 z_rd_int_3  
 
 1968 root   0 -20   0  0  0 S  11.2  0.0 163:25.52 z_rd_int_4  
 

# zpool iostat 1
  capacity operations bandwidth 
poolalloc   free   read  write   read  write
[...]
--  -  -  -  -  -  -
fst 2.11T  1.52T  13.8K  0   112M  0
srv 1.84T  6.32T  0  0  0  0
--  -  -  -  -  -  -
fst 2.11T  1.52T  17.4K  0   146M  0
srv 1.84T  6.32T  0  0  0  0
--  -  -  -  -  -  -
fst 2.11T  1.52T  17.3K  0   147M  0
srv 1.84T  6.32T  0  0  0  0
--  -  -  -  -  -  -


# arc_summary 


ZFS Subsystem ReportTue Oct 27 19:32:40 2020
ARC Summary: (HEALTHY)
Memory Throttle Count:  0

ARC Misc:
Deleted:688.20m
Mutex Misses:   115.54m
Evict Skips:99.92b

ARC Size:   89.14%  56.07   GiB
Target Size: (Adaptive) 9.30%   5.85GiB
Min Size (Hard Limit):  6.25%   3.93GiB
Max Size (High Water):  16:162.90   GiB

ARC Size Breakdown:
Recently Used Cache Size:   81.96%  24.51   GiB
Frequently Used Cache Size: 18.04%  5.39GiB

ARC Hash Breakdown:
Elements Max:   9.78m
Elements Current:   56.79%  5.55m
Collisions: 201.32m
Chain Max:  8
Chains: 736.70k

ARC Total accesses: 12.23b
Cache Hit Ratio:90.87%  11.12b
Cache Miss Ratio:   9.13%   1.12b
Actual Hit Ratio:   90.27%  11.04b

Data Demand Efficiency: 82.63%  666.79m
Data Prefetch Efficiency:   27.20%  14.18m

CACHE HITS BY CACHE LIST:
  Most Recently Used:   30.85%  3.43b
  Most Frequently Used: 68.49%  7.61b
  Most Recently Used Ghost: 0.13%   13.99m
  Most Frequently Used Ghost:   0.61%   67.51m

CACHE HITS BY DATA TYPE:
  Demand Data:  4.96%   550.94m
  Prefetch Data:0.03%   3.86m
  Demand Metadata:  94.20%  10.47b
  Prefetch Metadata:0.80%   89.48m

CACHE MISSES BY DATA TYPE:
  Demand Data:  10.37%  115.85m
  Prefetch Data:0.92%   10.32m
  Demand Metadata:  82.55%  921.91m
  Prefetch Metadata:6.15%   68.73m

L2 ARC Summary: (HEALTHY)
Low Memory Aborts:  116
Free on Write:  21.13k
R/W Clashes:3
Bad Checksums:  0
IO Errors:  0

L2 ARC Size: (Adaptive) 418.26  GiB
Compressed: 90.78%  379.71  GiB
Header Size:0.08%   360.27  MiB

L2 

[Bug 1901724] Re: Systemd user environment generator is not executable.

2020-10-27 Thread Seth Arnold
I thought gnome-shell started its own agent for ssh on startup? Or did
you configure your system to run the gnupg agent before starting gnome?

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901724

Title:
  Systemd user environment generator is not executable.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnupg2/+bug/1901724/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1901264] Re: package dbus 1.12.20-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: triggers looping, abandoned

2020-10-23 Thread Seth Arnold
** Also affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901264

Title:
  package dbus 1.12.20-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: triggers
  looping, abandoned

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus/+bug/1901264/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1871471] Re: flash end of life soon, suggest remove from hirsute

2020-10-23 Thread Seth Arnold
** Summary changed:

- flash end of life soon, suggest remove from groovy
+ flash end of life soon, suggest remove from hirsute

** Description changed:

  Hello, Adobe has said they will not be supporting Flash beyond 2020:
  
  https://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/kb/flash-format-support-in-pdf.html
  https://theblog.adobe.com/adobe-flash-update/
  
- I think we shouldn't ship Flash in groovy. Does our agreement with Adobe
- for distributing Flash installers or code allow us to skip shipping
- Flash in groovy?
+ I think we shouldn't ship Flash in hirsute. Does our agreement with
+ Adobe for distributing Flash installers or code allow us to skip
+ shipping Flash in hirsute?
  
  Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871471

Title:
  flash end of life soon, suggest remove from hirsute

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/1871471/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1873074] Re: kernel panic hit by kube-proxy iptables-save/restore caused by aufs

2020-10-21 Thread Seth Arnold
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:32:14PM -, Peter Burkholder wrote:
> Is there an approval/publication step that y'alls still need to take?

Yes, there is; it's been a busy, uh, three months give or take.

Thanks for the friendly reminder. :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873074

Title:
  kernel panic hit by kube-proxy iptables-save/restore caused by aufs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1873074/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899019] Re: Typo in UDisks action

2020-10-19 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello Kevin, thanks for the excellent GHSL-2020-161 report. Given that
the polkit rules are intentional, if ancient, and the udisks2 team
doesn't want to treat the symlink finding as a security bug, I'm going
to open this publicly and mark it wontfix, to reflect what's likely
going to happen for our currently released systems.

I do hope upstream handles the symlink discovery eventually but I can
appreciate why they wouldn't want to handle it as a security issue.

Thanks

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security

** Changed in: policykit-desktop-privileges (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899019

Title:
  Typo in UDisks action

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/policykit-desktop-privileges/+bug/1899019/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1867813] Re: [MIR] linux-firmware-raspi2 to restricted

2020-10-16 Thread Seth Arnold
I reviewed linux-firmware-raspi2 version 2-0ubuntu1 as checked into 
groovy. This is very quick pass over the package.

My concerns for this package are nearly identical to my concerns given in 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpi-eeprom/+bug/1895137/comments/11
Thanks Dave for anticipating similar expectations for this package:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware-raspi2/+bug/1867813/comments/13

One concern I have with this package is the get-orig-source target 
downloads files without strong verification of file contents, it is 
trusting the github infrastructure and x.509 ecosystem to make sure 
incorrect files aren't downloaded by accident.

This isn't ideal but also isn't restricted to this one package.

Security team ACK for promoting linux-firmware-raspi2 to restricted.

Thanks


** Changed in: linux-firmware-raspi2 (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) => (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867813

Title:
  [MIR] linux-firmware-raspi2 to restricted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware-raspi2/+bug/1867813/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom; raspberrypi-userland

2020-10-15 Thread Seth Arnold
I reviewed rpi-eeprom version 9.0-1ubuntu1 as checked into groovy. This
isn't a full security audit but a very quick gauge of maintainability.

Because this is an architecture-specific review, the usual tooling doesn't
work for this case. This is a slight problem for maintenance, because the
security team may not have sufficient hardware for update preparation or
update testing. We will probably need to rely upon other teams to provide
testing facilities.

The firmwares themselves are blackboxes similar to intel-microcode or
amd64-microcode. The only recourse we have in the face of regressions is
reverting updates and the same will hold with this package as well.

I'm also concerned about the update frequency given in the
debian/changelog file or releases.md file. The security team does not
have the bandwidth to track these updates ourselves. It is unlikely
each one has security relevance, but if Canonical gets too far behind
on these packages, the Ubuntu security team may have trouble importing
new versions.

So, I would like some assurances that another team will be SRUing new
versions of the package for all supported releases on an appropriate
time-scale to manage the risks associated with high-rate-of-change
projects.

Security team ACK for promoting rpi-eeprom to restricted CONDITIONAL 
on another team stating that they will provide testing resources and
periodically import updated versions as appropriate.

Thanks


** Changed in: rpi-eeprom (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) => (unassigned)

** Changed in: rpi-eeprom (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895137

Title:
  [MIR] rpi-eeprom; raspberrypi-userland

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/raspberrypi-userland/+bug/1895137/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891934] Re: [MIR] google-osconfig-agent

2020-10-13 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello, gosec has reported a debug tool is enabled that sounds dangerous:

google-osconfig-agent-20200625.00/main.go:42] - G108 (CWE-200): Profiling 
endpoint is automatically exposed on /debug/pprof (Confidence: HIGH, Severity: 
HIGH)
41:
  > 42: _ "net/http/pprof"
43:


Is this correct? Is this intentional?

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891934

Title:
  [MIR] google-osconfig-agent

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-osconfig-agent/+bug/1891934/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899176] Re: Linux Kernel FUTEX_WAIT Privilege Escalation Vulnerability

2020-10-09 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello, you can see which kernels were fixed with which versions on:

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-
security/cve/2020/CVE-2020-14381.html

Thanks

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2020-14381

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899176

Title:
  Linux Kernel FUTEX_WAIT Privilege Escalation Vulnerability

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1899176/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891157] Re: [MIR] ipp-usb

2020-10-08 Thread Seth Arnold
I reviewed golang-github-openprinting-goipp 1.0.0-1 as checked into
groovy.  This shouldn't be considered a full audit but rather a quick
gauge of maintainability.

golang-github-openprinting-goipp is a low-level serializer/deserializer
for IPP protocol messages.

- CVE History:
  - No CVEs in our database
- Build-Depends:
  debhelper-compat (= 13),
  dh-golang,
  golang-any
- pre/post inst/rm scripts?
  none
- init scripts?
  none
- systemd units?
  none
- dbus services?
  none
- setuid binaries?
  none
- binaries in PATH?
  none
- sudo fragments?
  none
- polkit files?
  none
- udev rules?
  none
- unit tests / autopkgtests?
  pretty decent collection of smoketests
- cron jobs?
  none
- Build logs:
  No actual build, very clean

- Processes spawned?
  none
- Memory management?
  none
- File IO?
  none
- Logging?
  none
- Environment variable usage?
  none
- Use of privileged functions?
  none
- Use of cryptography / random number sources etc?
  none
- Use of temp files?
  none
- Use of networking?
  not directly, but will process data from a network. Looked clean.
- Use of WebKit?
  none
- Use of PolicyKit?
  none
- Any significant Coverity results?
  none (no build, no coverity)


decodeString() and decodeBytes() look like they could be made to hang
forever if the remote peer sends along a length of N but then doesn't send
along N actual bytes of data in the stream afterwards.

decodeString() does no well-formedness checks on inputs: no utf8
enforcement, no newlines / whitespace etc. This appears to be used with
Name inputs. Much of the code appears able to handle arbitrary bytes well
enough, but the String() method for Collection doesn't do anything to
ensure that an output Name doesn't have { or }, [ or ], or a comma, etc.
Injecting newlines and new headers is a quite popular exploit technique;
are these routines susceptible to similar problems?

There's a pretty decent array non-adversarial test cases.

 W: golang-github-openprinting-goipp source: debhelper-compat-file-is-missing
 W: golang-github-openprinting-goipp source: 
package-uses-deprecated-debhelper-compat-version 1
 E: golang-github-openprinting-goipp source: 
package-uses-debhelper-but-lacks-build-depends
 W: golang-github-openprinting-goipp source: newer-standards-version 4.5.0 
(current is 4.1.4)

Security team ACK for promoting golang-github-openprinting-goipp to
main.


** Changed in: golang-github-openprinting-goipp (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) => (unassigned)

** Changed in: golang-github-openprinting-goipp (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891157

Title:
  [MIR] ipp-usb

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-github-openprinting-goipp/+bug/1891157/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891157] Re: [MIR] ipp-usb

2020-10-08 Thread Seth Arnold
Alexander, Till, it would be nice if we could run these components as
non-root. It'd be wonderful to have some systemd seccomp enforcement, as
well as AppArmor profiles. Please consider what steps could be taken to
reduce the privileges of these services.

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891157

Title:
  [MIR] ipp-usb

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-github-openprinting-goipp/+bug/1891157/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899080] Re: grub bootloader install failed, ubunu won't boot

2020-10-08 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello Kamal, I noticed this line in your logs:

Oct  8 20:25:56 ubuntu ubiquity: grub-install: error: failed to register
the EFI boot entry: Operation not permitted.

Does your BIOS / SETUP have any entries that would prevent you from
changing your boot order?

Thanks

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899080

Title:
  grub bootloader install failed, ubunu won't boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1899080/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899039] Re: package libgcc1 1:10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04 failed to install/upgrade: O pacote está num mau estado de inconsistência; deve reinstala-lo antes de tentar configura-lo.

2020-10-08 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899039

Title:
  package libgcc1 1:10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04 failed to install/upgrade: O
  pacote está num mau estado de inconsistência; deve  reinstala-lo antes
  de tentar configura-lo.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-10/+bug/1899039/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898995] Re: Unity bugs

2020-10-08 Thread Seth Arnold
There's no indication in the attachments what went wrong, you'll need to
provide more information yourself. Thanks

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898995

Title:
  Unity bugs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1898995/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898977] Re: The system is not getting upgraded from 16.04 to 18.04

2020-10-08 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello Himanshu,

I don't believe ROS packages allow you to upgrade the system.

Thanks

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898977

Title:
  The system is not getting upgraded from 16.04 to 18.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1898977/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1891157] Re: [MIR] ipp-usb

2020-10-08 Thread Seth Arnold
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 07:31:36PM -, Alexander Pevzner wrote:
> thank you for security review of the ipp-usb package. My few comments:

Hello Alexender, thank you very much for the feedback review! It's very
helpful, and very encouraging. Thanks. :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891157

Title:
  [MIR] ipp-usb

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-github-openprinting-goipp/+bug/1891157/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899046] Re: /usr/bin/aa-notify:ModuleNotFoundError:/usr/bin/aa-notify@39

2020-10-08 Thread Seth Arnold
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/aa-notify", line 39, in 
import psutil
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'psutil'

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899046

Title:
  /usr/bin/aa-notify:ModuleNotFoundError:/usr/bin/aa-notify@39

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1899046/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891157] Re: [MIR] ipp-usb

2020-10-07 Thread Seth Arnold
I reviewed ipp-usb 0.9.13-1ubuntu1 as checked into groovy.  This shouldn't be
considered a full audit but rather a quick gauge of maintainability.

ipp-usb is an http proxy to provide ipp printing support to USB devices.

- CVE History:
  No CVEs in our database, very new
- Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13),
   libusb-1.0-0-dev,
   libavahi-common-dev,
   libavahi-client-dev,
   pkg-config,
   dh-golang,
   golang-go (>= 2:1.14~2) | golang-any,
   golang-github-openprinting-goipp-dev,

- pre/post inst/rm scripts?
  automatically added by debhelper
- init scripts?
  none
- systemd units?
  Simple one-shot, starts after avahi and cups, runs ipp-usb with no
  configurable parameters
- dbus services?
  none
- setuid binaries?
  none
- binaries in PATH?
  /sbin/ipp-usb
- sudo fragments?
  none
- polkit files?
  none
- udev rules?
  matches usb devices, chowns to root:lp, 664 -- is this too wide?
- unit tests / autopkgtests?
  A handful of simple tests, no adversarial tests; the tests are for
  papersize size comparisons and parsing the configuration file.
- cron jobs?
  none
- Build logs:
  clean

- Processes spawned?
  none
- Memory management?
  None
- File IO?
  Only a handful of files are used with predictable paths
- Logging?
  logging rarely checked error conditions, probably fine
- Environment variable usage?
  none
- Use of privileged functions?
  No obvious uses
- Use of cryptography / random number sources etc?
  none
- Use of temp files?
  none
- Use of networking?
  networking primarily used go's http library; probably okay
- Use of WebKit?
  none
- Use of PolicyKit?
  none

- Any significant Coverity results?
  No, only two results:
  - resp is used before a nil check; it'll probably just crash if it hits
this
  - sha1 used for uuid generation, probably this is a standard of some
sort; it's not critical

The ipp-usb binary is missing PIE, apparently Go PIE is too buggy to use
by default. Hopefully someday we'll be able to turn this on for all golang
packages in one go.

gosec identified a lot of cases of ignoring error returns. Some, like
errors in logging, are probably not a big deal, but others I did wonder
how the program is supposed to make progress if there's an ignored
earlier. This worries me. I hope the application would just crash though.

Extensive use of atomic operations worries me that locking should have
been used instead. I didn't understand the reason for these to be atomic
while reading the code, and it's entirely possibly that they're needlessly
atomic. If there's a reason why they are atomic, then probably more effort
needs to be put into making this thread-safe.

The code is otherwise straightforward.

Security team ACK for promoting ipp-usb to main.

Thanks

** Changed in: ipp-usb (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) => (unassigned)

** Changed in: ipp-usb (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891157

Title:
  [MIR] ipp-usb

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-github-openprinting-goipp/+bug/1891157/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898962] Re: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.155+2.04-1ubuntu35 failed to install/upgrade: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote grub-efi-amd64-signed, o script post-installation retornou erro do st

2020-10-07 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898962

Title:
  package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.155+2.04-1ubuntu35 failed to
  install/upgrade: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote grub-efi-
  amd64-signed, o script post-installation retornou erro do status de
  saída 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1898962/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1892559] Re: [MIR] ccid libpam-pkcs1 libpcsc-perl opensc pcsc-tools pcsc-lite

2020-10-07 Thread Seth Arnold
Christian, Joy has gone through the bugs and either closed old ones or
made some progress on still-relevant ones. How does it look to you now?
Thanks Joy!

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892559

Title:
  [MIR] ccid libpam-pkcs1 libpcsc-perl opensc pcsc-tools pcsc-lite

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ccid/+bug/1892559/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898864] Re: ?

2020-10-07 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898864

Title:
  ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1898864/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898840] Re: boot errors,

2020-10-07 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello, My guess is that possibly-corrupted FAT filesystem. I assume
that's your EFI filesystem, and it'll need to be correct in order to do
most operations on it, and if it was unmounted uncleanly, that may cause
the tools to fail.

Do you have other operating systems on this computer? do you have data
on this computer that you care about? The possible ways this can go are
complicated, it'd probably be best to look for help on irc (#ubuntu on
irc.freenode.net) or something similarly responsive and experienced, to
deal with your individual situation.

Thanks

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898840

Title:
  boot errors,

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1898840/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1765933] Re: Allow building livefses against a view of the archive at a fixed point in time

2020-10-06 Thread Seth Arnold
Ayub, please do not change the status of bug reports. Thanks.

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1765933

Title:
  Allow building livefses against a view of the archive at a fixed point
  in time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1765933/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898742] Re: Linux Kernel "ppp_cp_parse_cr()" Denial of Service Vulnerability

2020-10-06 Thread Seth Arnold
This appears to be: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-
security/cve/2020/CVE-2020-25643.html

Thanks

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2020-25643

** Package changed: linux-meta (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898742

Title:
  Linux Kernel "ppp_cp_parse_cr()" Denial of Service Vulnerability

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1898742/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898734] Re: hata verdi

2020-10-06 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898734

Title:
  hata verdi

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1898734/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898620] Re: package libreoffice-draw 1:6.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.10 failed to install/upgrade: dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile subprocess returned error exit status 2

2020-10-06 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898620

Title:
  package libreoffice-draw 1:6.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.10 failed to
  install/upgrade: dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile subprocess returned error
  exit status 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1898620/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898617] Re: Not upgrading to 20.0

2020-10-06 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898617

Title:
  Not upgrading to 20.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1898617/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898590] Re: Verify DNS fingerprints not working

2020-10-06 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello, dig will do dns lookups itself, it doesn't rely on the host
resolver configuration. Does your host resolver configuration support
dnssec? It might be worth using tcpdump or tshark or wireshark to see if
the queries are properly formed, and if the replies are correct.

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898590

Title:
  Verify DNS fingerprints not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1898590/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898488] Re: ubuntu upgrade failed because of unnoficial software packages

2020-10-06 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898488

Title:
  ubuntu upgrade failed because of unnoficial software packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1898488/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898448] Re: package util-linux 2.34-0.1ubuntu9.1 failed to install/upgrade: package util-linux is already installed and configured

2020-10-06 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898448

Title:
  package util-linux 2.34-0.1ubuntu9.1 failed to install/upgrade:
  package util-linux is already installed and configured

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1898448/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898351] Re: Wifi does not show up or work

2020-10-06 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898351

Title:
  Wifi does not show up or work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1898351/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898333] Re: package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.21-0ubuntu0.20.04.4 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado paquete mysql-server-8.0 script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de

2020-10-06 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898333

Title:
  package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.21-0ubuntu0.20.04.4 failed to
  install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado paquete mysql-server-8.0
  script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/1898333/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898803] [NEW] postinst file uses sha1sum, eval, nobody, nogroup

2020-10-06 Thread Seth Arnold
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***

Public security bug reported:

Hello, the postinst file and Makefile use unsafe tools as part of
installing an external package:

- use of eval in the Makefile on data from the fetched remote archive.
This does come after the checksum is checked, so it's not world-burning,
but it's poor form.

- The checksum used is sha1sum, which is no longer suitable for use for
software integrity when retrieved over the public internet.

- The user nobody and the group nogroup are used incorrectly. This user
and this group are reserved for NFS use and should not be used in other
contexts.

Thanks

** Affects: google-android-ndk-installer (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898803

Title:
  postinst file uses sha1sum, eval, nobody, nogroup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-android-ndk-installer/+bug/1898803/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898157] Re: package python3 3.8.2-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: installed python3 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 4

2020-10-06 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898157

Title:
  package python3 3.8.2-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: installed
  python3 package post-installation script subprocess returned error
  exit status 4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults/+bug/1898157/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898051] Re: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.93.20+2.02-2ubuntu8.18 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2020-10-06 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello, does your BIOS / setup have any settings that would prevent
updating the boot order?

Thanks

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898051

Title:
  package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.93.20+2.02-2ubuntu8.18 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1898051/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898031] Re: Upgrading from 18.04.4 LTS to 20.04.1 LTS

2020-10-06 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898031

Title:
  Upgrading from 18.04.4 LTS to 20.04.1 LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1898031/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >