Re: [Bug 1928393] Re: linux-firmware 1.197 causes kernel to report error "amdgpu: [gfxhub0] retry page fault"

2021-05-14 Thread Seth Forshee
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 06:01:50PM -, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > Ah, ok. This morning I went ahead and overwrote the whole of /lib/firmware/ > amdgpu/ with the files from the latest commit of the upstream linux- > firmware git repo you mention below. It's been only a little over 2 hours,

[Bug 1928393] Re: linux-firmware 1.197 causes kernel to report error "amdgpu: [gfxhub0] retry page fault"

2021-05-14 Thread Seth Forshee
gt; Incomplete ** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Seth Forshee (sforshee) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928393 Title: linux-firmware 1.197

[Bug 1926955] Re: [VMs on] arm64 eMAG system often failing to reboot with "IRQ Exception at 0x000000009BC11F38"

2021-05-05 Thread Seth Forshee
A synchronous exception is a direct result of the executing software -- illegal memory access, invalid instruction, etc. So this looks different than the IRQ exception, which are interrupts from devices external to the CPU. However since this is a VM guest context the exceptions are presumably all

[Bug 1926955] Re: arm64 eMAG system often failng to reboot with "IRQ Exception at 0x000000009BC11F38"

2021-05-03 Thread Seth Forshee
I couldn't find anywhere in the kernel that might be printing this message so I went searching, looks like it is probably coming from the firmware: https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmPlatformPkg/PrePeiCore/AArch64/ArchPrePeiCore.c#L29 -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1925750] Re: Ubuntu 21.04 not loading correctly intel graphics driver

2021-04-26 Thread Seth Forshee
I honestly don't know much about how these dual-GPU systems work. I suspect there must be some firmware interfaces for enabling/disabling the discrete GPU, I have no idea whether those are standardized or platform-specific. Assuming the kernel supports the interfaces for your platform, I also

[Bug 1925750] Re: Ubuntu 21.04 not loading correctly intel graphics driver

2021-04-26 Thread Seth Forshee
The reason you don't see any Intel graphics drivers in the "Addditional Drivers" tab is that none are needed. The Intel graphics driver (i915) is open source and already included in the kernel, and from your logs it has been loaded. There's nothing I'm seeing currently which indicates a kernel

[Bug 1925783] Re: installed linux-firmware package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-04-23 Thread Seth Forshee
It is odd that you have so many marked manually installed. Unless you actually installed those packages manually, they should be marked as automatically installed. We do keep a few kernels installed, so that it's possible to boot back to a previous kernel if an update causes problems, but it

[Bug 1925783] Re: installed linux-firmware package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-04-23 Thread Seth Forshee
Do you have a separate /boot partition? If so, check whether or not it's full. You may need to remove some old kernel packages you are no longer using. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1925407] Re: ubuntu_aufs_smoke_test failed on Hirsute RISCV (CONFIG_AUFS_FS is not set)

2021-04-22 Thread Seth Forshee
Oh, there was also fsprotect which used aufs. But it looked to be abandoned upstream, and other packages provided duplicate functionality using overlayfs, so it has been removed from the archive in hirsute. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1925407] Re: ubuntu_aufs_smoke_test failed on Hirsute RISCV (CONFIG_AUFS_FS is not set)

2021-04-22 Thread Seth Forshee
Disabling AUFS was a choice, we planned to update the test accordingly but just didn't get to it. The only remaining software which used AUFS in the archive was docker, and even there support is deprecated in favor of overlayfs. In hirsute a migration strategy was put in place for docker, so AUFS

[Bug 1925284] Re: Btrfs: Disk replacement causes massive allocation of empty single chunks while degraded

2021-04-22 Thread Seth Forshee
I just confirmed that Ubuntu 21.04 has no kernel patches for btrfs that are not from upstream stable releases, so I have doubts that this is Ubuntu-specific. We do produce testing builds of unpatched upstream kernel releases though, so you could try out 5.11 and 5.12 builds to check whether this

[Bug 1925211] Re: Hot-unplug of disks leaves broken block devices around in Hirsute on s390x

2021-04-21 Thread Seth Forshee
** Description changed: + SRU Justification + + [Impact] + + Hot removal of disks under kvm on s390 does not result in the kernel + removing the block device, which can lead to hung tasks and other + issues. + + [Test Plan] + + See steps to reproduce the bug in the original description below.

[Bug 1925211] Re: Hot-unplug of disks leaves broken block devices around in Hirsute on s390x

2021-04-21 Thread Seth Forshee
The condition for css_sch_device_unregister(sch) also caught my eye, calling it unconditionally is probably closer to right because it was called in the !cdev case before, and in the attached patch it would no longer be called in this case. However I think in the short term the revert is the

[Bug 1925211] Re: Hot-unplug of disks leaves broken block devices around in Hirsute

2021-04-20 Thread Seth Forshee
The commit reverts cleanly. We need to confirm that reverting the commit does fix the issue. I put a test build here, please test. https://people.canonical.com/~sforshee/lp1925211/ I doubt we can get a new kernel into the release. If it's extremely urgent we can consider a day 0 SRU kernel for

[Bug 1923846] Re: Kernel panic

2021-04-15 Thread Seth Forshee
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1922403 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922403 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1922403 hirsute beta desktop AMD64 ISO kernel panic on boot when booting using UEFI -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1923638] Re: [FFe] evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu2 fails to build with linux 5.11

2021-04-14 Thread Seth Forshee
** Attachment added: "install.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evdi/+bug/1923638/+attachment/5487811/+files/install.log ** Description changed: - evdi in hirsute cannot be used with the 5.11 kernel in hirsute. Upstream - updates for 5.11 proved problematic, and a working set of

[Bug 1923638] Re: [FFe] evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu2 fails to build with linux 5.11

2021-04-14 Thread Seth Forshee
** Attachment added: "build.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evdi/+bug/1923638/+attachment/5487810/+files/build.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923638 Title:

[Bug 1923638] Re: [FFe] evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu2 fails to build with linux 5.11

2021-04-14 Thread Seth Forshee
The project does not maintain a changelog, so instead attaching the git commit history between the v1.7.0 and v1.9.1 tags. ** Attachment added: "changelog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evdi/+bug/1923638/+attachment/5487808/+files/changelog.txt -- You received this bug

[Bug 1923638] Re: [FFe] evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu2 fails to build with linux 5.11

2021-04-14 Thread Seth Forshee
** Summary changed: - [FFE] evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu2 fails to build with linux 5.11 + [FFe] evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu2 fails to build with linux 5.11 ** Description changed: - This is a scripted bug report about ADT failures while running evdi - tests for linux/5.11.0-14.15 on hirsute. Whether

[Bug 1923638] Re: [FFE] evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu2 fails to build with linux 5.11

2021-04-14 Thread Seth Forshee
** Summary changed: - evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu2 ADT test failure with linux/5.11.0-14.15 + [FFE] evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu2 fails to build with linux 5.11 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1923638] [NEW] evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu2 ADT test failure with linux/5.11.0-14.15

2021-04-13 Thread Seth Forshee
Public bug reported: This is a scripted bug report about ADT failures while running evdi tests for linux/5.11.0-14.15 on hirsute. Whether this is caused by the dep8 tests of the tested source or the kernel has yet to be determined. Testing failed on: ** Affects: evdi (Ubuntu) Importance:

[Bug 1922759] Re: SND_PCI_QUIRK for Clevo NH55RZQ and Intel NUC10

2021-04-07 Thread Seth Forshee
These commits are already included in hirsute, closing the development task. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1922406] Re: Intel AX210 Wi-Fi card does not work since updating to 1.196

2021-04-07 Thread Seth Forshee
ged in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Seth Forshee (sforshee) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad

[Bug 1922406] Re: Intel AX210 Wi-Fi card does not work since updating to 1.196

2021-04-07 Thread Seth Forshee
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #212371 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212371 ** Also affects: linux via https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212371 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1922406] Re: Intel AX210 Wi-Fi card does not work since updating to 1.196

2021-04-07 Thread Seth Forshee
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922406 Title: Intel AX210 Wi-Fi card does not work since updating to 1.196

[Bug 1913903] Re: package linux-firmware 1.190 failed to install/upgrade: no se pudieron copiar los datos extraídos de './lib/firmware/dpaa2/mc/mc_10.10.0_lx2160a.itb' a '/lib/firmware/dpaa2/mc/mc_10.

2021-04-07 Thread Seth Forshee
It looks like the package may have downloaded incorrectly. If you are still seeing this issue, try running 'sudo apt-get clean' in a terminal and then try upgrading again. ** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1895333] Re: cannot change the regulatory domain ath10k, QCA9984 (QNAP QWA-AC2600)

2021-04-07 Thread Seth Forshee
I came across this bug when looking through open linux-firmware bugs. Sorry that it didn't attract any attention before. If this is still a problem, I think the right solution is to pursue a solution upstream. Once one is found we can accept these fixes into Ubuntu. Unfortunately, changing our

[Bug 1922545] Re: gnome-system-monitor fails to launch

2021-04-06 Thread Seth Forshee
I don't see a reason this was filed against the kernel. Changing to gnome-system-monitor. ** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => gnome-system-monitor (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1922732] [NEW] RM: Remove fsprotect binary and source packages from hirsute

2021-04-06 Thread Seth Forshee
Public bug reported: I am requesting removal of the fsprotect source and binary packages from hirsute. [ Package Description ] fsprotect is a tool which uses AUFS to create a root mount built from a read-only filesystem and a tmpfs. All changes to the root mount are written to the tmpfs,

[Bug 1922600] Re: Hirsute update: v5.11.10 upstream stable release

2021-04-05 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922600 Title: Hirsute update: v5.11.10 upstream stable release To

[Bug 1922601] Re: Hirsute update: v5.11.11 upstream stable release

2021-04-05 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922601 Title: Hirsute update: v5.11.11 upstream stable release To

[Bug 1922601] [NEW] Hirsute update: v5.11.11 upstream stable release

2021-04-05 Thread Seth Forshee
ress of descriptor when display ring mt76: mt7915: only modify tx buffer list after allocating tx token id mt76: fix tx skb error handling in mt76_dma_tx_queue_skb ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Seth Forshee (sforshee) Status: In Progress

[Bug 1915717] Re: [FEATURE] Hirsute: support TLS device offload for Bond

2021-04-05 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915717 Title: [FEATURE] Hirsute: support TLS device offload for Bond

[Bug 1922372] Re: i915 doesn't support some high pixel clock 4k * 60Hz monitors

2021-04-05 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922372 Title: i915 doesn't support some high pixel clock 4k * 60Hz monitors

[Bug 1922600] [NEW] Hirsute update: v5.11.10 upstream stable release

2021-04-05 Thread Seth Forshee
Warn on pinning without holding a reference" Revert "drm/ttm: make ttm_bo_unpin more defensive" ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Seth Forshee (sforshee) Status: In Progress ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1905020] Re: [21.04 FEAT] Add kernel debug infos for decompressor stage to kernel-debug package

2021-04-01 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: Canonical Kernel Team (canonical-kernel-team) => Seth Forshee (sforshee) -- You received this bug not

[Bug 1903288] Re: Power guest secure boot with static keys: kernel portion

2021-03-29 Thread Seth Forshee
Sorry, I wasn't seeing emails for this bug despite being subscribed. Not sure what's going on with that. If the key is self-signed, shouldn't having the key in .builtin_trusted_keys allow for loading it into the IMA keyring? Or is that insufficient for some reason? -- You received this bug

Re: [Bug 1636847] Re: unexpectedly large memory usage of mounted snaps

2021-03-23 Thread Seth Forshee
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 01:36:55AM -, SaveTheRbtz wrote: > Is it possible (pun intended) to compromise on > `CONFIG_SQUASHFS_DECOMP_MULTI` (which uses num_online_cpus) instead of > `CONFIG_SQUASHFS_DECOMP_MULTI_PERCPU` (which uses `num_possible_cpus`)? It's better, but still not that great of

[Bug 1636847] Re: unexpectedly large memory usage of mounted snaps

2021-03-17 Thread Seth Forshee
@SaveTheRbtz I did get to the cause, and added a lot of notes about it in the comments for this bug. I even wrote some code to provide a more balanced compromise between memory usage and performance, but once the memory issues were alleviated it seems no one cared about it enough to even try out

[Bug 1919492] Re: Hirsute update: v5.11.7 upstream stable release

2021-03-17 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Assignee: (unassigned) => Seth Forshee (sforshee) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1919492] Re: Hirsute update: v5.11.7 upstream stable release

2021-03-17 Thread Seth Forshee
** Description changed: - - SRU Justification - - Impact: -The upstream process for stable tree updates is quite similar -in scope to the Ubuntu SRU process, e.g., each patch has to -demonstrably fix a bug, and each patch is vetted by upstream -by

[Bug 1919492] [NEW] Hirsute update: v5.11.7 upstream stable release

2021-03-17 Thread Seth Forshee
Public bug reported: SRU Justification Impact: The upstream process for stable tree updates is quite similar in scope to the Ubuntu SRU process, e.g., each patch has to demonstrably fix a bug, and each patch is vetted by upstream by originating either

[Bug 1903288] Re: Power guest secure boot with static keys: kernel portion

2021-03-08 Thread Seth Forshee
I should have mentioned, the kernel in comment #11 is not signed with the archive signing key since it's in a personal ppa, but the cert which is built into the kernel is for the archive key. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1903288] Re: Power guest secure boot with static keys: kernel portion

2021-03-08 Thread Seth Forshee
Here's a test build with public cert for the opal signing key built into .builtin_trusted_keys: https://launchpad.net/~sforshee/+archive/ubuntu/lp1903288 I'm still working out exactly how we want to distribute the key in the filesystem, but if you can try that out and let me know whether that

[Bug 1916872] Re: oss4-dkms: build failure with linux 5.11

2021-02-26 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: oss4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: oss4 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916872 Title:

[Bug 1916905] Re: openrazer 2.9.0+dfsg-1 build failure with linux 5.10* on s390x

2021-02-26 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: openrazer (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916905 Title: openrazer 2.9.0+dfsg-1 build failure with linux 5.10* on

[Bug 1903288] Re: Power guest secure boot with static keys: kernel portion

2021-02-09 Thread Seth Forshee
Sorry for the delayed response here, it's taken me a while to get some of the needed information. In general this should be fine. One thing to note is that the key is self-signed, so we will need to add the signing key itself into .builtin_trusted_keys. This should still allow loading the key

[Bug 1911835] Re: package linux-firmware 1.187.7 failed to install/upgrade: installed linux-firmware package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-01-29 Thread Seth Forshee
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1911836 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1911836 Marking as a duplicate of bug 1911836 based on comment #2. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1911836 package linux-image-5.4.0-62-generic 5.4.0-62.70 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts:

[Bug 1912947] Re: bluetooth: hci0: failed to restart LE scan: status 31

2021-01-25 Thread Seth Forshee
** Package changed: linux-firmware (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912947 Title: bluetooth: hci0: failed to restart LE scan: status 31 To manage

[Bug 1912811] [NEW] Update dwarves-dfsg in focal to version 1.17 from groovy

2021-01-22 Thread Seth Forshee
: Invalid ** Affects: dwarves-dfsg (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Medium Assignee: Seth Forshee (sforshee) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: dwarves-dfsg (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: dwarves-dfsg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Inva

[Bug 1907298] Re: glibc 2.32-0ubuntu5 ADT test failure with linux 5.10.0-7.8

2021-01-20 Thread Seth Forshee
Reverting "powerpc/64/signal: Balance return predictor stack in signal trampoline" gets the test passing, so that does appear to be the cause. I'm not sure what needs to happen here to resolve the test failure though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1912499] [NEW] Reset upload number to 1 for derivative ABI bumps

2021-01-20 Thread Seth Forshee
: Low Assignee: Seth Forshee (sforshee) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912499 Title: Reset upload number to 1 for derivative ABI bumps To manage

[Bug 1912198] Re: package linux-firmware 1.187.8 failed to install/upgrade: installed linux-firmware package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-01-19 Thread Seth Forshee
@Tim I do not think you have the same problem. I see some errors which look like debconf is attempting to prompt you about something but failing to find a frontend to use for the prompt. Possibly this is the cause, but I'm not sure. You can try running the upgrade like this: #

[Bug 1907298] Re: glibc 2.32-0ubuntu5 ADT test failure with linux 5.10.0-7.8

2021-01-19 Thread Seth Forshee
Looking through powerpc changes between Linux 5.8 and 5.10, I see a handful of changes to signal-related code. This in particular jumps out as potentially affecting the register state for signal handling: commit 0138ba5783ae0dcc799ad401a1e8ac8333790df9 Author: Nicholas Piggin Date: Mon May 11

[Bug 1912208] Re: package linux-firmware 1.187.7 failed to install/upgrade: unable to create '/lib/firmware/brcm/BCM-0bb4-0306.hcd.dpkg-new' (while processing './lib/firmware/brcm/BCM-0bb4-0306.hcd'):

2021-01-19 Thread Seth Forshee
Have you tried to install any firmware, either manually or via third- party packages? Are you running any antivirus tools? What is the output from running the following commands in a terminal? ls -ld /lib/firmware/brcm ls -l /lib/firmware/brcm ** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1912198] Re: package linux-firmware 1.187.8 failed to install/upgrade: installed linux-firmware package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-01-19 Thread Seth Forshee
The problem appears to be a failed sync when regenerating the initrd. Looking through the attached dmesg I see a lot of disk-related errors. This could indicate a kernel bug or potentially a hardware problem. This is not directly a problem in linux-firmware, reassigning to linux. Have you noticed

[Bug 1909495] Re: Unable to start BIOS VMs since Linux 5.10

2021-01-12 Thread Seth Forshee
Seems like it might be the same as this bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210695 If so this is the fix, which is already queued up for the next 5.10 stable update:

[Bug 1900141] Re: overlay: permission regression in 5.4.0-51.56 due to patches related to CVE-2020-16120

2021-01-11 Thread Seth Forshee
Confirmed that the attached test script reproduces the problem with 5.8.0-36-generic from groovy-updates. ith 5.8.0-37-generic from groovy- proposed the problem is fixed. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-groovy ** Tags added: verification-done-groovy -- You received this bug notification

Re: [Bug 1900141] Re: overlay: permission regression in 5.4.0-51.56 due to patches related to CVE-2020-16120

2021-01-11 Thread Seth Forshee
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:12:35AM -, Philipp Wendler wrote: > I tested it on a Focal machine and the -proposed kernel works. However, > I don't have a Groovy machine here, is it necessary for me to test this? I can verify the fix in groovy. > I noticed that in the list of affected packages

[Bug 1903288] Re: Power guest secure boot with static keys: kernel portion

2021-01-11 Thread Seth Forshee
I think I've got a good idea of what you're after here. Let me look into this, and I'll try to get back to you soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903288 Title: Power guest secure

[Bug 1909705] Re: Fix Realtek 8821c bluetooth fails reconnect BLE devices after suspend

2021-01-08 Thread Seth Forshee
@Kai-Heng please add some information about how you verified this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909705 Title: Fix Realtek 8821c bluetooth fails reconnect BLE devices after suspend

[Bug 1900141] Re: overlay: permission regression in 5.4.0-51.56 due to patches related to CVE-2020-16120

2021-01-07 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900141 Title: overlay: permission regression in 5.4.0-51.56 due to patches

[Bug 1900141] Re: overlay: permission regression in 5.4.0-51.56 due to patches related to CVE-2020-16120

2021-01-06 Thread Seth Forshee
** Description changed: + SRU Justification + + [Impact] + + The backports to fix CVE-2020-16120 introduced a regression for overlay + mounts within user namespaces. Files with ownership outside of the user + namespace can no longer be accessed, even if allowed by both DAC and + MAC. + + This

[Bug 1900141] Re: overlay: permission regression in 5.4.0-51.56 due to patches related to CVE-2020-16120

2021-01-06 Thread Seth Forshee
New => In Progress ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Seth Forshee (sforshee) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Groovy

[Bug 1900141] Re: overlay: permission regression in 5.4.0-51.56 due to patches related to CVE-2020-16120

2021-01-06 Thread Seth Forshee
Apologies for the delay on this bug. There is a fix upstream in 5.11-rc1, I've backported the fix to the test kernel located here: https://people.canonical.com/~sforshee/lp1900141/linux-5.4.0-59.65+lp1900141v202101061102/ I'm also attaching a script which reproduces the bug. In my testing the

[Bug 1907158] Re: Update linux-firmware in focal for 5.8 hwe kernel

2020-12-16 Thread Seth Forshee
I confirmed that that correct new firmware files have been added, and that the contents of those files match what is expected. I also confirmed that the nic-firmware udeb updates are as expected, and that there are no changes to the contents of the scsi-firmware udeb. ** Tags added:

[Bug 1904906] Re: 5.10 kernel fails to boot with secure boot disabled

2020-12-10 Thread Seth Forshee
That's not the sort of config we usually turn on, as it's more of a developer feature than something end users are interested in. So I don't see any need to turn the option back on. We can go ahead and grab the patch though. In any case I'd like to get some secure boot testing with the current

[Bug 1907307] Re: lxc 1:4.0.4-0ubuntu3 ADT test failure with linux 5.10.0-7.8

2020-12-08 Thread Seth Forshee
lxc-test-api-reboot fails. The container fails to start, I see lots of errors in the logs related to mounting things. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907307 Title: lxc

[Bug 1907307] [NEW] lxc 1:4.0.4-0ubuntu3 ADT test failure with linux 5.10.0-7.8

2020-12-08 Thread Seth Forshee
Public bug reported: Testing failed on: amd64: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute-canonical-kernel-team-bootstrap/hirsute/amd64/l/lxc/20201208_183047_03358@/log.gz arm64:

[Bug 1907298] [NEW] glibc 2.32-0ubuntu5 ADT test failure with linux 5.10.0-7.8

2020-12-08 Thread Seth Forshee
Public bug reported: Testing failed on: ppc64el: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute-canonical-kernel-team-bootstrap/hirsute/ppc64el/g/glibc/20201208_192946_04f11@/log.gz -- FAIL: misc/tst-sigcontext-get_pc

[Bug 1904906] Re: 5.10 kernel fails to boot with secure boot disabled

2020-12-08 Thread Seth Forshee
The 5.10.0-7.8 with CONFIG_RCU_SCALE_TEST disabled has completed and is available in https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel- team/+archive/ubuntu/bootstrap as before. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1907158] [NEW] Update linux-firmware in focal for 5.8 hwe kernel

2020-12-07 Thread Seth Forshee
encounter issues when upgrading. ** Affects: linux-firmware (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Seth Forshee (sforshee) Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Medium Assignee: Seth Forshee (sforshee) Status: In Progress

[Bug 1904906] Re: 5.10 kernel fails to boot with secure boot disabled

2020-12-07 Thread Seth Forshee
Our latest 5.10 update is building with CONFIG_RCU_SCALE_TEST disabled, I will update once the build is complete. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904906 Title: 5.10 kernel fails to

[Bug 1906404] Re: New upstream release 2020.11.20

2020-12-03 Thread Seth Forshee
ntu Precise) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: wireless-regdb (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: wireless-regdb (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: wireless-regdb (Ubuntu Precise) Assignee: (unassigned) =&g

[Bug 1906404] Re: New upstream release 2020.11.20

2020-12-03 Thread Seth Forshee
** Description changed: - New upstream version, bringing in updated regulatory rules for various - jurisdictions. + [Impact] + + New upstream release. This is a database of wireless regulations, and + should updated in all releases to ensure users have the most up-to-date + regulatory

[Bug 1906404] [NEW] New upstream release 2020.11.20

2020-12-01 Thread Seth Forshee
Public bug reported: New upstream version, bringing in updated regulatory rules for various jurisdictions. ** Affects: wireless-regdb (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: Seth Forshee (sforshee) Status: Fix Committed ** Affects: wireless-regdb (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance

[Bug 1904906] Re: 5.10 kernel fails to boot with secure boot disabled

2020-11-30 Thread Seth Forshee
That config shouldn't be on at all, it's just a performance test that isn't likely to be of interest to users. I agree it's weird though -- it shouldn't cause boot problems, as it shouldn't be loaded automatically (the module doesn't even have any modaliases). Regardless, I will disable the

[Bug 1905195] Re: package linux-firmware 1.187.4 failed to install/upgrade: installed linux-firmware package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2020-11-30 Thread Seth Forshee
>From the dpkg terminal log: update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.15.0-125-generic Fatal: raid_setup: stat("/dev/disk/by-id/ata-TOSHIBA_MK5055GSX_Z9K8SF7NS") run-parts: /etc/initramfs/post-update.d//runlilo exited with return code 1 dpkg: error processing package linux-firmware

[Bug 1905195] Re: package linux-firmware 1.187.4 failed to install/upgrade: installed linux-firmware package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2020-11-30 Thread Seth Forshee
Added lilo as an affected package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905195 Title: package linux-firmware 1.187.4 failed to install/upgrade: installed linux-firmware package

[Bug 1905770] Re: package linux-firmware 1.187.5 failed to install/upgrade: installed linux-firmware package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2020-11-30 Thread Seth Forshee
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1905195 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905195 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1905195 package linux-firmware 1.187.4 failed to install/upgrade: installed linux-firmware package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit

[Bug 1905787] Re: package linux-firmware 1.187.6 failed to install/upgrade: installed linux-firmware package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2020-11-30 Thread Seth Forshee
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1905195 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905195 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1905195 package linux-firmware 1.187.4 failed to install/upgrade: installed linux-firmware package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit

[Bug 1904906] Re: 5.10 kernel fails to boot with secure boot disabled

2020-11-19 Thread Seth Forshee
I also note that you are testing with 5.10.0-0, which was based on 5.10-rc1. We have 5.10.0-4 in the ppa now based on -rc4, it is built for hirsute and not groovy though. I'd recommend trying that version to see if there was an upstream bug which has already been fixed. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1904906] Re: 5.10 kernel fails to boot with secure boot disabled

2020-11-19 Thread Seth Forshee
I've attached our configs for the Ubuntu 5.8 and 5.10 kernels along with a diff between these configs. I didn't see anything in the diff which looked like an obvious candidate for causing the boot problems. Please let me know if you see something there which should be changed. -- You received

[Bug 1904906] Re: 5.10 kernel fails to boot with secure boot disabled

2020-11-19 Thread Seth Forshee
** Patch added: "Diff between Ubuntu 5.8 and 5.10 ppc64el kernel configs" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1904906/+attachment/5436111/+files/ppc64el-config.flavour.generic.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1904906] Re: 5.10 kernel fails to boot with secure boot disabled

2020-11-19 Thread Seth Forshee
** Attachment added: "Ubuntu ppc64el kernel config for 5.10" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1904906/+attachment/5436110/+files/ppc64el-config.flavour.generic-5.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1904906] Re: 5.10 kernel fails to boot with secure boot disabled

2020-11-19 Thread Seth Forshee
** Attachment added: "Ubuntu ppc64el kernel config for 5.8" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1904906/+attachment/5436109/+files/ppc64el-config.flavour.generic-5.8 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1904618] Re: /usr/share/imapfilter/regex.lua:10: bad argument #1 to 'compile' (string expected, got nil)

2020-11-18 Thread Seth Forshee
I filed a bug upstream, the issue is fixed in v2.7.4. https://github.com/lefcha/imapfilter/issues/218 Here's the fix: https://github.com/lefcha/imapfilter/commit/987ea442fa0aa3dc5f5d59ec89c9a3d818cd48d3 ** Bug watch added: github.com/lefcha/imapfilter/issues #218

[Bug 1904618] [NEW] /usr/share/imapfilter/regex.lua:10: bad argument #1 to 'compile' (string expected, got nil)

2020-11-17 Thread Seth Forshee
Public bug reported: Started getting this error after upgrading from 1:2.6.16-1 to 1:2.7.2-1. Gives the following stacktrace: $ /usr/bin/imapfilter -c ~/.imapfilter/mail.lua imapfilter: /usr/share/imapfilter/regex.lua:10: bad argument #1 to 'compile' (string expected, got nil) stack traceback:

[Bug 1904578] Re: Update linux-signed/linux-restricted-modules for forward port suffixes

2020-11-17 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux-signed (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1904578] [NEW] Update linux-signed/linux-restricted-modules for forward port suffixes

2020-11-17 Thread Seth Forshee
-modules (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: Seth Forshee (sforshee) Status: Fix Committed ** Affects: linux-signed (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: Seth Forshee (sforshee) Status: Fix Committed ** Also affects: linux-restricted-modules (Ubuntu

[Bug 1904294] Re: package linux-firmware 1.157.23 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2020-11-16 Thread Seth Forshee
Here are the error messages from the log files: Setting up linux-firmware (1.157.23) ... update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-170-generic E: amd64-microcode: unsupported kernel version! E: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/casper-memdisk failed with return 1. update-initramfs:

[Bug 1904067] [NEW] Fix linux-libc-dev build for hirsute forward port kernels

2020-11-12 Thread Seth Forshee
Make this a wildcard, "debian.master*", which will allow us to build linux-libc-dev for hirsute forward-port kernels. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: Seth Forshee (sforshee) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1902957] [NEW] Update kernel packaging to support forward porting kernels

2020-11-04 Thread Seth Forshee
: Medium Assignee: Seth Forshee (sforshee) Status: In Progress ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1900141] Re: overlay: permission regression in 5.4.0-51.56 due to patches related to CVE-2020-16120

2020-10-20 Thread Seth Forshee
in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Seth Forshee (sforshee) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900141

[Bug 1892728] Re: ec2-hibinit-agent needs to properly initialize swap file

2020-10-14 Thread Seth Forshee
option if we want to use hibernation w/ kernels >= 5.6. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: Incomplete => In Progress ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Groovy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Seth Forshee (sforshee) -- You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 1895862] Re: vboxsf unable to mount old binary data in Groovy Vagrant box

2020-10-07 Thread Seth Forshee
Though it seems like upstream basically says to either use their modules together with their userspace tools, or else don't use their userspace tools: https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/17728#no1 If we take that stance then shouldn't guest-utils have a hard dependency on virtualbox-guest-dkms?

[Bug 1895862] Re: vboxsf unable to mount old binary data in Groovy Vagrant box

2020-10-07 Thread Seth Forshee
Looking at the upstream vboxsf driver, this "Old binary mount data not supported ..." message happens due to this old-style mount data being explicitly provided via mount(2). It seems to me that whatever is doing that (presumably /sbin/mount.vboxsf) should just retry the mount without the binary

[Bug 1896950] Re: d2020.09.22 cycle tracker

2020-09-28 Thread Seth Forshee
** Tags removed: block-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896950 Title: d2020.09.22 cycle tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1896950] [NEW] d2020.09.22 cycle tracker

2020-09-24 Thread Seth Forshee
Public bug reported: This bug is a cycle tracking bug for the d2020.09.22 development cycle. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: Incomplete ** Affects: linux-aws (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1890435] Re: gcc-10 breaks on armhf (flaky): internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2020-09-23 Thread Seth Forshee
We're also seeing this in kernel builds. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/498669973/buildlog_ubuntu-groovy- armhf.linux_5.8.0-20.21_BUILDING.txt.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890435

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >