[Bug 910296] Re: Please backport the upstream patch to prevent attacks based on hash collisions

2012-01-14 Thread Ted Reed
Initial testing shows a crash from the error message there. A version with the error message pulled out seems to be functioning. There may be additional code from 2.3.9 that the Ubuntu version doesn't have and needs to support the error message. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 910296] Re: Please backport the upstream patch to prevent attacks based on hash collisions

2012-01-14 Thread Ted Reed
Initial testing shows a crash from the error message there. A version with the error message pulled out seems to be functioning. There may be additional code from 2.3.9 that the Ubuntu version doesn't have and needs to support the error message. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 910296] Re: Please backport the upstream patch to prevent attacks based on hash collisions

2012-01-13 Thread Ted Reed
You actually need two commits for this fix. This one is the 5.3 branch commit for the first commit: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=321038 There was a fix to that commit later: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=321335 I've combined both of these patches into one

[Bug 910296] Re: Please backport the upstream patch to prevent attacks based on hash collisions

2012-01-13 Thread Ted Reed
Also, I might bump this up a little higher than medium. This is a verified bug with trivially reproducible DoS capability. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/910296 Title:

[Bug 910296] Re: Please backport the upstream patch to prevent attacks based on hash collisions

2012-01-13 Thread Ted Reed
You actually need two commits for this fix. This one is the 5.3 branch commit for the first commit: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=321038 There was a fix to that commit later: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=321335 I've combined both of these patches into one

[Bug 910296] Re: Please backport the upstream patch to prevent attacks based on hash collisions

2012-01-13 Thread Ted Reed
Also, I might bump this up a little higher than medium. This is a verified bug with trivially reproducible DoS capability. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/910296 Title: Please

[Bug 320700] Re: gvim rendering is slow

2011-12-29 Thread Ted Reed
I'm also experiencing this in Oneiric with vim 2:7.3.154+hg~74503f6ee649-2ubuntu3. treed@treed-laptop:~$ time vim -u NONE -U NONE -S test-redraw-speed.vim /etc/init.d/README real0m0.161s treed@treed-laptop:~$ time gvim -u NONE -U NONE -f -S test-redraw-speed.vim /etc/init.d/README real

[Bug 796075] Re: Flash no longer works in Chromium

2011-06-14 Thread Ted Reed
Sweet, that fixed it. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/796075 Title: Flash no longer works in Chromium To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 796075] Re: Flash no longer works in Chromium

2011-06-13 Thread Ted Reed
Okay. I've upgraded to 13.0.782.15~r88529+1-0ubuntu1~ucd~dev1~natty. Still the same problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/796075 Title: Flash no longer works in Chromium To manage

[Bug 796075] Re: Flash no longer works in Chromium

2011-06-13 Thread Ted Reed
Tested it in Firefox and Epiphany. Neither one has Flash. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/796075 Title: Flash no longer works in Chromium To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 796075] Re: Flash no longer works in Chromium

2011-06-13 Thread Ted Reed
I can try that when I get home tonight. I guess I should have mentioned that I did try aptitude reinstall flashplugin-nonfree. I expect that'll be different based on the difference in package, though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 794545] Re: Flash is not working in Firefox after update to 10.3.181.22

2011-06-11 Thread Ted Reed
This also seems to be affecting Chromium on my AMD64 system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/794545 Title: Flash is not working in Firefox after update to 10.3.181.22 To manage

[Bug 796075] [NEW] Flash no longer works in Chromium

2011-06-11 Thread Ted Reed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree This may be related to #7945454, but it wouldn't let me add my info to it, and it may well be different. Chromium doesn't (and therefore websites don't) see Flash as installed. I'm on 64-bit Natty, fully updated.

[Bug 796075] Re: Flash no longer works in Chromium

2011-06-11 Thread Ted Reed
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/796075 Title: Flash no longer works in Chromium To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 762964] Re: Bluetooth doesn't work in Ubuntu 11.04

2011-04-29 Thread Ted Reed
I'm experiencing similar problems where Bluetooth isn't working, but the workaround is not fixing it for me. I don't know if it matters much, but the BT icon on the bar is grayed out, even when it says Bluetooth: On. (Clicking Preferences shows a window indicating that it's off, as well.)

[Bug 110992] Re: ipmi modules need to manually inserted and device created

2011-02-17 Thread Ted Reed
I can confirm the same results as Niklas. In addition, there are errors that occur during installation of ipmitool: (Reading database ... 48065 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libreadline5 (from .../libreadline5_5.2-7build1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected

[Bug 110992] Re: ipmi modules need to manually inserted and device created

2011-02-17 Thread Ted Reed
I can confirm the same results as Niklas. In addition, there are errors that occur during installation of ipmitool: (Reading database ... 48065 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libreadline5 (from .../libreadline5_5.2-7build1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected

Re: [Bug 532451] Re: Intel WiMAX/WiFi Link 6050 series wireless does not work

2010-06-08 Thread Ted Reed
So I'll need to upgrade to Maverick then? - Theodore Reed On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 05:55, Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com wrote: Won't fix for Lucid - The driver in 2.6.32 for this series adapter was never functional. ** Also affects: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance:

[Bug 462084] Re: [Dell Inc. Latitude E5500] suspend/resume failure

2010-04-27 Thread Ted Reed
Hasn't happened in a while, as far as I know. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- [Dell Inc. Latitude E5500] suspend/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462084 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 462084] Re: [Dell Inc. Latitude E5500] suspend/resume failure

2009-10-27 Thread Ted Reed
** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34492951/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: AplayDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34492952/AplayDevices.txt ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34492953/BootDmesg.txt **

[Bug 462084] [NEW] [Dell Inc. Latitude E5500] suspend/resume failure

2009-10-27 Thread Ted Reed
Public bug reported: [ubuntu-bug -p is apparently deprecated. You should probably fix the guidelines.] ProblemType: KernelOops Annotation: This occured during a previous suspend and prevented it from resuming properly. Architecture: i386 ArecordDevices: List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices

[Bug 462180] [NEW] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x10010000

2009-10-27 Thread Ted Reed
Public bug reported: . ProblemType: KernelOops Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be restarted. Architecture: i386 ArecordDevices: List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog] Subdevices:

[Bug 462180] Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x10010000

2009-10-27 Thread Ted Reed
** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34498287/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: AplayDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34498288/AplayDevices.txt ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34498289/BootDmesg.txt **