This issue has priority "high" and is now over one year old.
A fix is known (see my post above) - I apply this diff each time a
update-manager update overwrites the patched version on my laptop and it
works ok for me since I wrote it.
So, can we have this finally fixed, please? In all supported
The duplicate I noted 2017-05-30 has the analysis / solution I found.
So, how long is it going to take to fix such a trivial bug and deploy it
to all xenial users to finally fix this daily battery-eating annoyance?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Note: we will maybe *require* openssl 1.1.x for borgbackup 1.2 because
of thread-safety and ciphers offered.
For borg 1.2 *developers*, it would be nice to have openssl 1.1 in
ubuntu ASAP.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
this is the easiest way to fix the issue (not perfect though, dialog box
looks slightly different afterwards):
--- UpdateManager.py.orig 2017-07-20 22:23:11.643707331 +0200
+++ UpdateManager.py2017-07-20 22:24:03.048405983 +0200
@@ -88,9 +88,10 @@
@brian I also have intel gfx (haswell generation integrated gfx) in my
laptop and this issue is happening about every day for me (each time
update-manager waits for my final click - which is kind of superfluous
anyway for cases where updates worked flawlessly).
So I am wondering whether this gets
Ah, OP noticed the focus difference also. I can confirm!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1622510
Title:
update-manager popup consumes a lot of CPU
To manage notifications about this
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1637180
duplicate with this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1622510
Title:
update-manager popup consumes a lot of CPU
I found out something interesting right now:
- when the update manager dialogue box is the selected window, it does
not suck a lot of cpu
- but when you select something else (an icon, another window, does not
matter), cpu usage of update-manager, compiz and xorg jumps upwards (see
screenshot in
Attached a screenshot with proof.
When I close the dialogue, the cpu usage seen on the screenshot
vanishes, so it is definitely the update-manager dialogue causing this.
This is a real annoyance and I am asking myself how many kWh get burned
down every day without reason due to this.
**
Also affects me and is not limited to the "needs to restart" dialogue
box.
It also happens for the "computer is up to date" dialogue box shown
after applying updates.
Maybe for ANY such dialogue box?
Please fix, this is a real annoyance to having to click on "OK" just to
stop the CPU fan
I have this all the time. evolution in 11.04, dovecot on debian6.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772386
Title:
Deleted IMAP email in Evolution sometimes returns
To manage
I have same problem as eric kerby.
Deletion of emails in inbox first makes the email(s) disappear (as
expected), but often they reappear just a minute later.
Server is dovecot 1.2.15-4 on Debian squeeze.
This is a regression in natty, I did not have this problem on 10.10 and
also I am still not
I suggest to raise importance.
Having a multiple-times-a-day reproducable annoying regression in the
standard email client of ubuntu is definitely more than low
importance.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
might be related to bug #675908 (sounds similar, although it did not
happen to me on 10.10)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772386
Title:
Deleted IMAP email in Evolution sometimes
might be related to bug #772386
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675908
Title:
with update to 10.10 in October Evolution no longer removes messages
from server.
--
ubuntu-bugs
I installed directvnc from lucid / amd64, it is still broken in the same
way.
ii directvnc 0.7.5-9ubuntu1
$ directvnc 10.10.10.7:0 -p foo
Authentication OK
(!) DirectFB/Config 'quiet': Unknown message type ''!
(!) DirectFB/Config 'quiet': Unknown message type
If you need help from MoinMoin development for getting 1.9.2 into lucid,
just tell me.
I really recommend using 1.9.x because that will be our last 1.x release
before we do really big changes in 2.x.
It is likely that because of that, we'll support 1.9.x for a longer time
(not sure about how
After a discussion with Debian we decided to not update to 1.9.2
(from Debian Unstable) because upstream decided to support 1.9.x series
longer than 1.8.x (mind LTS!)
That sounds confusing. Drop the not?
--
[FFe] Please sync moin to 1.9.2-1 from Debian(Unstable)
I also have the segfault problem on ubuntu 9.10.
ii libapache2-mod-auth-kerb 5.3-5build1
apache2 module for Kerberos authentication
It happens very often here, logs are full of it.
More info see there: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=494688
I looked into
I also have the segfault problem on ubuntu 9.10.
ii libapache2-mod-auth-kerb 5.3-5build1
apache2 module for Kerberos authentication
It happens very often here, logs are full of it.
More info see there: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=494688
I looked into
Well, there is still something broken:
t...@x300:~$ sudo apt-get install -f
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 436kB of
Thanks Imre, that worked.
Maybe the new package could have included some scripting to do these
steps automatically, if needed.
--
Variable mismatch in /etc/init.d/pdns-recursor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403957
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Anyone awake here?
--
intrepid and jaunty may have buggy mod-wsgi 2.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493736
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Public bug reported:
Today I inspected some intrepid system because I want to install moin
1.9 with wsgi on it soon.
I found that intrepid still has libapache2-mod-wsgi 2.3 and my first
thought was oh crap, the same buggy version that was in debian lenny
for too long. jaunty also seems to still
Added affects moinmoin (I didn't reproduce it with moin/mod-wsgi on
intrepid, but it likely does, because this was a upstream bug of mod-
wsgi 2.3).
** Also affects: moinmoin
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
intrepid and jaunty may have buggy mod-wsgi 2.3
In case it matters: my laptop is a Lenovo Thinkpad X300, 3cell bay
battery + 6cell main battery.
--
System shutdown on 0% for 1 of 2 batteries.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379599
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I just have seen this on Jaunty (as of today, with all updates
installed).
I had one battery at about 99%, the other at 0%. Usually this works
without problems - if you use 2 batteries, you have that state rather
often.
But today I plugged in the power supply with the batteries being in that
problems and while your symptoms may match, a solution to Thomas' bug
(which indeed may already be solved) may not fix yours. Since we've not
heard from Thomas
BTW, to make it clear:
You did not hear from me again, because I do not have the machine any
more. I have a small IT company and I
Some more infos, as requested, see attachment.
As an additional note, while reproducing the problem I managed multiple
times to crash the machine (black screen, num lock not responding any
more, neither ctrl-alt-del nor sysreq) just by toggling between console
and X11 with Ctrl-Alt-F1 and -F7
xorg.conf is without modifications.
** Attachment added: xorg.conf
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23721875/xorg.conf
--
Switch from X11 to console: black or corrupted display
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333812
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23721856/Xorg.0.log
--
Switch from X11 to console: black or corrupted display
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333812
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Attachment added: dmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23721872/dmesg.txt
--
Switch from X11 to console: black or corrupted display
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333812
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log.old
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23721860/Xorg.0.log.old
--
Switch from X11 to console: black or corrupted display
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333812
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I also have inverted display brightness keys behaviour.
Another annoyance is that something seems to turn down the brightness
short after login, so you have to adjust brightness up (using the
brightness down key) all the time.
Happens on Ubuntu 8.10 x86 desktop with all updates as of today.
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Bug happens with Ubuntu 8.10 Intrepid x86 desktop with all updates as of
today on a Thinkpad SL500
First method (non fatal):
---
booting into ubuntu
see splash screen animation.
when gdm login screen
35 matches
Mail list logo
