[Bug 1964697] [NEW] speedtest-cli crash

2022-03-12 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: When called from crontab, speedtest-cli sometimes crashes. Crashes tend to occur more frequently shortly after a reboot. cat /etc/cron.d/speedtest # UncleT scripts to monitor upstream network SHELL=/bin/bash

[Bug 1877658] Re: very buggy on download exe with sourceforge

2022-01-15 Thread Todd Taft
Errors like this are still common during install: Get:1 http://downloads.sourceforge.net/corefonts/andale32.exe [198 kB] Fetched 198 kB in 1s (213 kB/s) Err:1 http://downloads.sourceforge.net/corefonts/arial32.exe Could not resolve 'iweb.dl.sourceforge.net' E: Failed to fetch

[Bug 1954635] Re: subiquity crashes when attempting advanced network/disk configuration

2021-12-16 Thread Todd Taft
The major number would suggest that it's a logical volume, but it doesn't seem to correspond to a logical volume, so I'm not sure what it is: # lsblk NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT loop0 7:00 377.4M 1 loop /media/filesystem loop1

[Bug 1954635] Re: subiquity crashes when attempting advanced network/disk configuration

2021-12-13 Thread Todd Taft
** Attachment added: "Contents of /var/crash in crashed install" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1954635/+attachment/5547285/+files/var.crash.tgz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1954635] Re: subiquity crashes when attempting advanced network/disk configuration

2021-12-13 Thread Todd Taft
** Attachment added: "Contents of /var/log in crashed install" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1954635/+attachment/5547284/+files/var.log.tgz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1954635] [NEW] subiquity crashes when attempting advanced network/disk configuration

2021-12-13 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: Subiquity for 20.04 crashes and a system install attempt fails when attempting to do an install with a complex network or disk configuration. When attempting an install with a semi-complex configuration (e.g. multiple network interfaces bonded together using LACP or multiple

[Bug 1954582] [NEW] activation-mode directive not recognized in user-data file

2021-12-11 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: Using daily update image for 20.04 Placing activation-mode in the netplan section of the user-data file results in an error about an unknown token. After the automated install fails and you get dumped to a shell, no changes to files in /etc/netplan are needed to make the

[Bug 1934735] Re: package gitolite3 3.6.11-2 failed to install/upgrade: installed gitolite3 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-12-09 Thread Todd Taft
It looks like the root cause of this issue is that the post-install script uses the mktemp command when the current user is root and the default Ubuntu configuration sets $TMPDIR to /tmp/user/uid# so the temporary file that gets created is in /tmp/user/0. Later, the script switches to the

[Bug 1932525] Re: This bug is back on my pc - bug #1722481 Systemd Sync twice at shutdown

2021-12-09 Thread Todd Taft
I am seeing something similar on 20.04. If my network fails and I have any network filesystems mounted (including nfs3 or nfs4 via autofs or iSCSI via fstab) when I issue a shutdown or reboot command, then I am likely to have a 10+ minute delay after the console displays that it has reached

[Bug 95925] Re: debsecan should be either adjusted (for ubuntu) or removed

2021-12-04 Thread Todd Taft
The unofficial database proposed in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debsecan/+bug/95925/comments/12 appears to work. It's at least a major improvement on the current situation. I'd suggest that Ubuntu officially adopt the server-side tool and that appropriate updates are made to the

[Bug 95925] Re: debsecan should be either adjusted (for ubuntu) or removed

2021-12-04 Thread Todd Taft
** Tags added: focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95925 Title: debsecan should be either adjusted (for ubuntu) or removed To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1953212] [NEW] easygit homepage returns 404 error

2021-12-03 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: The project homepage listed in easygit packaging returns a 404 error. The package info as shown by apt, aptitude, etc. lists a URL that returns a 404, and the upstream-source listed in /usr/share/doc/easygit/copyright also has this problem. It appears that

[Bug 1952901] [NEW] default ciderwebmail-uwsgi.conf breaks Apache

2021-12-01 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: Package: ciderwebmail Version: 1.05+20191006-1 OS: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS The /etc/apache2/conf-enabled/ciderwebmail-uwsgi.conf file that is shipped with ciderwebmail breaks Apache when it is enabled. Apache fails with: apachectl[69192]: AH00526: Syntax

[Bug 1952164] Re: cups.path repeatedly goes into systemd failed state

2021-11-24 Thread Todd Taft
Discovered this was a system-wide problem, not specifically related to cups. Backup program was holding open a very high number if inotify watches and this was causing issues for other programs (including cups). Solution was to add a conf file in /etc/sysctl.d that set a higher value for

[Bug 1952164] Re: cups.path repeatedly goes into systemd failed state

2021-11-24 Thread Todd Taft
** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952164 Title: cups.path repeatedly goes into systemd failed state To manage notifications

[Bug 1952164] [NEW] cups.path repeatedly goes into systemd failed state

2021-11-24 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: cups.path is repeatedly entering a failed state in systemd. Attempts to restart the unit or even reboot the machine are, at best, temporary solutions. # systemctl status cups.path ● cups.path - CUPS Scheduler Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/cups.path; enabled;

[Bug 1951920] [NEW] revise dependencies of munin to accept either munin-node or munin-node-c

2021-11-22 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: On a 20.04 system, attempting to install the packages munin and munin- node-c with aptitude fails, as munin recommends munin-node, but munin- node and munin-node-c conflict. Since both munin-node and munin-node-c provide the same function, the recommendation of the munin

[Bug 1946312] [NEW] nvidia: Process '/sbin/modprobe nvidia-uvm' failed with exit code 1.

2021-10-07 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: On 20.04, I'm getting repeated errors on my system when the nvdidia drivers are installed. This sequence of errors is logged multiple times per second: Oct 7 01:45:29 kangaroo systemd-udevd[499101]: nvidia: Process '/sbin/modprobe nvidia-drm' failed with exit code 1. Oct

[Bug 1946312] Re: nvidia: Process '/sbin/modprobe nvidia-uvm' failed with exit code 1.

2021-10-07 Thread Todd Taft
** Attachment added: "Output of lshw" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-470/+bug/1946312/+attachment/5531190/+files/lshw -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1940603] Re: postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication

2021-09-19 Thread Todd Taft
That change to the file does seem to prevent the error, and I appreciate the help with my immediate problem. I'm still wondering if having the program crash as it did without generating a very useful error message is desirable behavior. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1940603] Re: postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication

2021-09-09 Thread Todd Taft
Any more info you need? I was trying to follow the official Ubuntu server guide ( https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/mail-postfix ) with only a few deviations for things like a different location for SSL files. Are there more problems with that guide? Earlier in this item, you suggested moving

[Bug 1940603] Re: postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication

2021-08-25 Thread Todd Taft
** Attachment added: "main.cf" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1940603/+attachment/5520588/+files/main.cf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940603 Title:

[Bug 1940603] Re: postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication

2021-08-25 Thread Todd Taft
** Attachment added: "master.cf" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1940603/+attachment/5520589/+files/master.cf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940603 Title:

[Bug 1940603] Re: postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication

2021-08-25 Thread Todd Taft
I don't see a 220 message with the nc command either. State Recv-QSend-Q Local Address:PortPeer Address:Port Process LISTEN0 1127.0.0.1:246970.0.0.0:*

[Bug 1940603] Re: postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication

2021-08-25 Thread Todd Taft
I didn't think the sasl2-bin package was needed, but someone else suggested I try adding it. Even with the settings that I had, shouldn't I have seen some messages from the server on the telnet connection? (e.g. remote mail server connecting to send mail to an address where this system is the

[Bug 1940603] [NEW] postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication

2021-08-19 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: I'm trying to setup a combination IMAP/SMTP server using Dovecot and Postfix on a 20.04 system. After attempting to setup SASL authentication for postfix, the system fails with a postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms whenever any SMTP connection is

[Bug 1823521] Re: on_ac_power returns 1 if battery is not present

2021-08-03 Thread Todd Taft
I'm having a similar issue on Ubuntu 20.04 on a Lenovo P340, which is a desktop workstation system and thus doesn't even have any capability for battery operation without an external UPS. I'm attaching a copy of selected directories in /sys and /proc that the script inspects. ** Attachment

[Bug 1938672] [NEW] Incomplete information in AppArmorProfiles web documentation

2021-08-02 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: The table of profiles on the page https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/KnowledgeBase/AppArmorProfiles does not have any of the footnote entries for 20.04 or 20.10. Since these footnotes are present in the table for earlier versions of Ubuntu, it implies that there have been

[Bug 1937889] [NEW] weather not working with airport codes

2021-07-24 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: An example given in the man page for weather: weather rdu fails. taft@kangaroo:~$ weather rdu Searching via airport... No IATA/FAA airport code "rdu" in the /usr/share/weather-util/airports.gz file. I have tried multiple other airport codes, and none of them seem to work:

[Bug 1936273] [NEW] apt not respecting Ignore-Files-Silently directive

2021-07-14 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: I have a configuration management system that stores a backup copy of files that it updates with a suffix based upon the date that the file is updated (.-MM-DD) In Ubuntu 20.04, I have added a file 00ignore to the /etc/apt/apt.conf directory. The contents of the file

[Bug 1934735] [NEW] package gitolite3 3.6.11-2 failed to install/upgrade: installed gitolite3 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-07-05 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: Attempt to install gitolite3 fails. Directory path set in debconf for gitolite3/adminkey prior to install attempt. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: gitolite3 3.6.11-2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.10.0-1034.35-oem 5.10.41 Uname: Linux

[Bug 1908090] Re: ubuntu 20.04 kdump fails

2021-07-01 Thread Todd Taft
Are you sure you have this bug filed against the correct package? At a glance, it looks like you should file it against linux-meta (see https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/linux-crashdump ) kexec-tools "provides tools to load a kernel into memory and then "reboot" directly into that kernel using

[Bug 1933711] Re: defining tmpfs /tmp in autoinstall config fails

2021-06-28 Thread Todd Taft
The proposed fix works for me, both in the both in the simple example I posted, as well as a more complex configuration that I didn't post. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933711

[Bug 1933711] [NEW] defining tmpfs /tmp in autoinstall config fails

2021-06-26 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: Attempting to creat a tmpfs /tmp partition with the Ubuntu 20.04 autoinstaller fails with the error: __init__() missing 1 required positional argument: 'device' The relevant section of the user-data file I'm attempting is: - id: tmpfs1 type: mount spec:

[Bug 1933711] Re: defining tmpfs /tmp in autoinstall config fails

2021-06-26 Thread Todd Taft
** Attachment added: "Log files from failed install" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1933711/+attachment/5507187/+files/crash-logs.tgz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1917304] Re: Firefox bookmark separators not showing in budgie

2021-03-01 Thread Todd Taft
Issue still exists after going to Budgie Welcome -> Themes -> Pocillo -> Apply Makeover but not Budgie Welcome -> Themes -> QogirBudgie -> Apply Makeover (i.e. QogirBudgie renders separators.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1917304] Re: Firefox bookmark separators not showing in budgie

2021-03-01 Thread Todd Taft
expected-menu.png Shows bookmarks menu as rendered by "standard" Ubuntu (GNOME) - an appearance similar to this is what I expected. ** Attachment added: "expected-menu.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/budgie-desktop/+bug/1917304/+attachment/5471479/+files/expected-menu.png --

[Bug 1917304] Re: Firefox bookmark separators not showing in budgie

2021-03-01 Thread Todd Taft
menu-editor.png Shows separators exist in Firefox config (from Budgie system) ** Attachment added: "menu-editor.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/budgie-desktop/+bug/1917304/+attachment/5471478/+files/menu-editor.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1917304] Re: Firefox bookmark separators not showing in budgie

2021-03-01 Thread Todd Taft
budgie-menu.png: Bookmarks menu as rendered in Budgie ** Attachment added: "budgie-menu.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/budgie-desktop/+bug/1917304/+attachment/5471477/+files/budgie-menu.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1917304] [NEW] Firefox bookmark separators not showing in budgie

2021-03-01 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: In Ubuntu Budgie 20.04.2, bookmarks separators do not appear within Firefox bookmarks menu. This issue is being logged against Budgie, rather than Firefox because it does not appear in other variants of Ubuntu 20.04.2 (e.g. "standard"/GNOME, Ubuntu-Mate, Lubuntu) How to

[Bug 1778082] Re: Language Support Is Incomplete dialog must show package list to install

2020-06-06 Thread Todd Taft
I've also observed this behavior on Kubuntu 20.04. This command appears to fix the issue: sudo apt install $(check- language-support) Reference: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/421066/popup- language-support-is-incomplete-what-packages-does-it-want-to-install -- You received this bug

[Bug 1568459] Re: unison incompatible with older ubuntu/debian versions

2018-12-05 Thread Todd Taft
Problem is still present in 18.04 The unison-all and unison-all-gtk have no real content. The only thing in them is the copyright file and a changelog file that indicates that old versions were removed. This contradicts the package description which says that it install multiple supported

[Bug 1224723] Re: Clamscan finds CVE-2013-2465 in openjdk-6-jre-headless

2013-09-30 Thread Todd Taft
CVE-2013-2465 is a CVE against Java, although it is against Oracle Java. It's not immediately clear to me whether or not this vulnerability is also applicable to openJDK. Can you confirm that this vulnerability does not apply to openJDK (or that it is already patched in this version)? Labeling

[Bug 1224723] Re: Clamscan finds CVE-2013-2465 in openjdk-6-jre-headless

2013-09-30 Thread Todd Taft
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1224723 Title: Clamscan finds CVE-2013-2465 in openjdk-6-jre-headless To manage

[Bug 1224723] Re: Clamscan finds CVE-2013-2465 in openjdk-6-jre-headless

2013-09-30 Thread Todd Taft
CVE-2013-2465 is a CVE against Java, although it is against Oracle Java. It's not immediately clear to me whether or not this vulnerability is also applicable to openJDK. Can you confirm that this vulnerability does not apply to openJDK (or that it is already patched in this version)? Labeling

[Bug 1162119] [NEW] nagios not expanding wildcards correctly

2013-03-29 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: I'm running nagios 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 on 64 bit Ubuntu 12.04. I've turned on regular expression matching in /etc/nagios3/nagios.cfg with the line: use_regexp_matching=1 If I have some hosts defined like this in a file in /etc/nagios3/conf.d: define host{ use

[Bug 1162119] [NEW] nagios not expanding wildcards correctly

2013-03-29 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: I'm running nagios 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 on 64 bit Ubuntu 12.04. I've turned on regular expression matching in /etc/nagios3/nagios.cfg with the line: use_regexp_matching=1 If I have some hosts defined like this in a file in /etc/nagios3/conf.d: define host{ use

[Bug 1156678] [NEW] acroread not updating mozilla plugin version number correctly

2013-03-18 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: Version updates to Adobe Acrobat reader are not being reported correctly to Firefox. Although aptitude shows that I have version 9.5.4-1precise1 installed (as does Help-About Adobe Reader within Adobe Reader), when I go to tools-AddOns-Plugins in Firefox, the system reports

[Bug 1026139] Re: NFS client readdir loop

2013-03-11 Thread Todd Taft
I'm still seeing this bug in Ubuntu 12.04 (using static (i.e. non- automounter) mounts). Redhat claims to have fixed this bug with kernel release 2.6.32-279.el6 (for RHEL 6) and 2.6.18-348.el5 (for RHEL 5). Can their fixes be ported to the Ubuntu kernel tree? -- You received this bug

[Bug 1086151] [NEW] Nagios utils.pm has wrong default path to rpcinfo

2012-12-03 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: In the file /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/utils.pm , the default path to the rpcinfo command is specified as /usr/bin/rpcinfo . In more recent versions of Ubuntu (e.g. 12.04), the rpcinfo command has moved from /usr/bin/rpcinfo to /usr/sbin/rpcinfo . The default path in

[Bug 1086151] [NEW] Nagios utils.pm has wrong default path to rpcinfo

2012-12-03 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: In the file /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/utils.pm , the default path to the rpcinfo command is specified as /usr/bin/rpcinfo . In more recent versions of Ubuntu (e.g. 12.04), the rpcinfo command has moved from /usr/bin/rpcinfo to /usr/sbin/rpcinfo . The default path in

[Bug 1076656] Re: mysql --ssl-capath option doesn't work

2012-11-08 Thread Todd Taft
This bug is also present in mysql-client-core-5.1 on Ubuntu 10.04. It appears to have been introduced with release 5.1.66-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 in Ubuntu 10.04. ** Also affects: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1076656] [NEW] mysql --ssl-capath option doesn't work

2012-11-08 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: The --ssl-capath option to mysql no longer works. The problem seems to exist whether the option is passed as a command line flag or the equivalent option is set in a file (e.g. .my.cnf). If I use the --ssl- ca option to explicitly set a CA file, I don't have any problems.

[Bug 1076656] Re: mysql --ssl-capath option doesn't work

2012-11-08 Thread Todd Taft
This bug is also present in mysql-client-core-5.1 on Ubuntu 10.04. It appears to have been introduced with release 5.1.66-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 in Ubuntu 10.04. ** Also affects: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1020166] Re: Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799

2012-07-09 Thread Todd Taft
Shouldn't the update come from the socat package maintainer (Chris Taylor)? ** Changed in: socat (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to socat in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1020166] Re: Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799

2012-07-09 Thread Todd Taft
Shouldn't the update come from the socat package maintainer (Chris Taylor)? ** Changed in: socat (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020166 Title:

[Bug 1020770] [NEW] gdm install prompts about dm when debconf value set

2012-07-03 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: When installing gdm 3.0.4-0ubuntu15 on a 12.04 system via aptitude, I get prompted as to which dm I want to use, even if I have already set the appropriate debconf values before attempting the install. Steps to reproduce: echo gdm shared/default-x-display-manager select

[Bug 1020166] [NEW] Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799

2012-07-02 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: CVE-2010-2799 for socat has not been fixed on Ubuntu 10.04. The fix has been released upstream (1.7.1.3-1) and is already in Ubuntu 11.04 and later, so the fix may be as simple as adding this to the 10.04 updates. ** Affects: socat (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1020166] [NEW] Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799

2012-07-02 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: CVE-2010-2799 for socat has not been fixed on Ubuntu 10.04. The fix has been released upstream (1.7.1.3-1) and is already in Ubuntu 11.04 and later, so the fix may be as simple as adding this to the 10.04 updates. ** Affects: socat (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 772158] Re: samba force group option fails

2011-04-28 Thread Todd Taft
problem was triggered by setgid bit on directory. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772158 Title: samba force

[Bug 772158] Re: samba force group option fails

2011-04-28 Thread Todd Taft
problem was triggered by setgid bit on directory. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772158 Title: samba force group option

[Bug 772158] [NEW] samba force group option fails

2011-04-27 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Running x86_64 version of Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS samba version: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.5 The force group option is not working. If I specify a group to be forced on a share, new files/directories created by users connecting to this share do not get

[Bug 772158] Re: samba force group option fails

2011-04-27 Thread Todd Taft
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772158 Title: samba force group option fails -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or

[Bug 772158] [NEW] samba force group option fails

2011-04-27 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Running x86_64 version of Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS samba version: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.5 The force group option is not working. If I specify a group to be forced on a share, new files/directories created by users connecting to this share do not get

[Bug 772158] Re: samba force group option fails

2011-04-27 Thread Todd Taft
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772158 Title: samba force group option fails -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 670789] [NEW] libpam-afs-session gives user membership in nonexistant group

2010-11-04 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libpam-afs-session Using libpam-afs-session 1.7-2 on x86_64 version of Ubuntu 10.04.1 When I have this module in my PAM stack and I authenticate as a user with an AFS identity (and get a token), I get added to a group that doesn't exist, as reported by

[Bug 668436] [NEW] apparmor missing entry for some ssl ca cert files

2010-10-29 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apparmor The default apparmor profile in /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ssl_certs is missing entries for the /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla directory. Many of the files in the /etc/ssl/certs directory (which apparmor allows access to) are actually

[Bug 668436] Re: apparmor missing entry for some ssl ca cert files

2010-10-29 Thread Todd Taft
** Description changed: Binary package hint: apparmor The default apparmor profile in /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ssl_certs is missing entries for the /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla directory. Many of the files in the /etc/ssl/certs directory (which apparmor allows access to)

[Bug 250909] Re: Apt-get does not support packages of 2.5 gig...

2010-10-16 Thread Todd Taft
This fix also needs to be released for other supported versions of Ubuntu (lucid, karmic, etc.) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Apt-get does not support packages of 2.5 gig... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250909 You received this bug notification

[Bug 652479] Re: pam-afs-session cannot be managed by pam-auth-update

2010-10-12 Thread Todd Taft
Installing the 1.7-2 version from Debian testing fixed the problem for me. I second the proposal to resync with Debian. -- pam-afs-session cannot be managed by pam-auth-update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652479 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 652479] [NEW] pam-afs-session cannot be managed by pam-auth-update

2010-09-30 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libpam-afs-session OS: Running 10.04.1 on amd64 platform. Software versions: libpam-runtime: 1.1.1-2ubuntu5 libpam-afs-session: 1.7-1build1 The pam-afs-session module cannot be managed by pam-auth-update. When I have libpam-afs-session installed, and I

[Bug 605149] [NEW] Upgrade to cups-bsd_1.4.3-1ubuntu1.2 hangs during preseeded install

2010-07-13 Thread Todd Taft
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cups When my system runs aptitude -y full-upgrade during an preseeded (automated) install, the upgrade to the cups-bsd package hangs the upgrade. The system is installing the 64-bit version of 10.04. The aptitude upgrade is run from a script called by