[Bug 293442] Re: nicotine crashes when you perform a search
Above report confirmed + error msg, also the below error seen just before the crash (in an infinite loop) pynicotine.slskmessages.FileSearchResult unpack requires a string argument of length 4 This is a known error: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1444023 http://www.nicotine-plus.org/ticket/589 Upgrading to version /nicotine+-1.2.15.tar.gz from the nicotine-plus site, solves the problem ** Bug watch added: Nicotine Plus Trac #589 http://www.nicotine-plus.org/ticket/589 -- nicotine crashes when you perform a search https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293442 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 568705] Re: Amarok does not start after upgrade to lucid
The problem was the Ultimate Lyrics Script, this script was downloaded by the user, this bug can be closed. Thanks for the help! -- Amarok does not start after upgrade to lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568705 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 568705] [NEW] Amarok does not start after upgrade to lucid
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: amarok After installing lucid and using my old home dir (so no dist upgrade) amarok always crashes. - removing .kde/share/apps/amarok/ the program starts normaly ** Affects: amarok (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: lucid -- Amarok does not start after upgrade to lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568705 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 568705] Re: Amarok does not start after upgrade to lucid
Indeed, thanks for the info, bug report attached. ** Attachment added: amarok-20100423.kcrash http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45051949/amarok-20100423.kcrash -- Amarok does not start after upgrade to lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568705 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 568705] Re: Amarok does not start after upgrade to lucid
This user installed scripts, is it possible to disable scripts when starting? This might be the case here. -- Amarok does not start after upgrade to lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568705 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 509248] Re: [PPA] Thunderbird 3 Shows only English dictionary in Spell menu
Tested the above suggestion and it worked, I would suggest making this link -- [PPA] Thunderbird 3 Shows only English dictionary in Spell menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509248 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182038] Re: Black rectangle instead of image in FF3 [Hardy]
I now reinstalled the open source nv driver and went to my black rectangle test site and things appear to be working now. Also the screen saver is working again. I will keep my system on the open source nv driver and test if the black rectangles reappear. The proprietary driver seemed to be working fine. -- Black rectangle instead of image in FF3 [Hardy] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182038] Re: Black rectangle instead of image in FF3 [Hardy]
We have switched a system over from the nv to the proprietary nvidia driver. Problems seems to have been solved. Another issue with the desktop is that the screensavers were not working. In the preview they were black and the open source nv driver. Now everything is working and visible again. Later today we will switch back again and see how the state of the system for the open source nv driver is now -- Black rectangle instead of image in FF3 [Hardy] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216683] [NEW] Black rectangle instead of image in FF3 [Hardy]
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 This is a duplicate of Bug #182038, We are testing hardy intensively and have decided that FF3 is not up to par. Sites which are working in FF2 are not working properly (the website of one of the biggest banks of the Netherlands sometimes does and sometimes does not show the full menu - it works in FF2), also lots of pictures appear black. We have to make the decision to install Hardy on about 100 workstations and we can not explain to users why pictures appear black in the browser. A lot of people are using the above mentioned website, and some people can not see their own pictures on their own blog (which they could see before in FF2). This is a serious regression and we are not going to burden our users with a browser that is not fully functional. So we would like to see this bug (which is not a bug report) as a discussion to put all duplicates of this but in the right section: a blocker. This is an attempt to explain how serious this bug is and how it can damage the rock solid image of Ubuntu ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Black rectangle instead of image in FF3 [Hardy] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216683 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182038] Re: Black rectangle instead of image in FF3 [Hardy]
What I don't understand is that the priority of this bug is only Unkown/Medium/Undecided. It looks like a lot of folks have problems with firefox 3. For example I know an organisation now running gutsy which has a blog where a number of pictures turn black on Hardy FF3. I would not think of switching them to Hardy. The problem is that it is very hard to reproduce. So for me it is a critical bug. -- Black rectangle instead of image in FF3 [Hardy] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182038] Re: Black rectangle instead of image in FF3 [Hardy]
I see the black images also in various sites, if I copy the url of the image to its own tab and press shift reload button continuously, the the previous black image is shown, but sometimes firefox prints out: image . can not be displayed because it contains errors maybee this helps I also don't think that changing the xorg.conf configuration file is a good solution. We deploy ubuntu on 100 of stations and can not check every one of them. For the average user it is a bummer to have a firefox which does not display all images which used to be properly displayed for many years. I find this bug, though not critical, very disturbing from a user perspective. -- Black rectangle instead of image in FF3 [Hardy] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 212749] [NEW] gdmflexiserver --xnest does not start
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm Description:Ubuntu hardy (development branch) Release:8.04 gdm: Installed: 2.20.4-0ubuntu3 Candidate: 2.20.4-0ubuntu3 Version table: *** 2.20.4-0ubuntu3 0 500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Description of problem: Applications - System Tools - New Login in a Window gdmflexiserver --xnest fails with following message: Can not start display The X server failed. Perhaps it is not configured well. gdmflexiserver works normally X server is working Expected bahaviour: a gdm login window inside of the current desktop What happened instead: The gdm login window is not started, instead a warning window with above message ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gdmflexiserver --xnest does not start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212749 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189506] Re: Normal user can't access USB camera Error (-53: 'Could not claim the USB device')
Thanks, this worked for the udev part, however I don't get a message on dbus. If the real implementation is not through udev, it might not be worthwhile pursuing this path. What needs to be done to make these camera's work with the new hardy- hardware-detection specs before release of hardy? (I am only beta testing) Though not critical, users will expect their camera's to work, especially when they used to work with dapper/feisty/gutsy. -- Normal user can't access USB camera Error (-53: 'Could not claim the USB device') https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189506 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205980] [NEW] hardy firefox-3 no symlink in xulrunner-addons/plugins
Public bug reported: Installation of the java6 mozilla plugin is in /usr/lib/firefox- plugins/plugins, not in /usr/lib/xulrunner-addons/plugins ** Affects: sun-java6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- hardy firefox-3 no symlink in xulrunner-addons/plugins https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205980 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205980] Re: hardy firefox-3 no symlink in xulrunner-addons/plugins
This bug should be linked to: sun-java6-plugin -- hardy firefox-3 no symlink in xulrunner-addons/plugins https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205980 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205992] [NEW] hardy cacert RA niet seen by firefox -3
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ca-certificates after installing ca-certificates, the cacert root certificate is not seen by firefox 3 ** Affects: ca-certificates (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- hardy cacert RA niet seen by firefox -3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205992 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205992] Re: hardy cacert RA niet seen by firefox -3
Hello, I am expecting ca-certificates to install root certificates system wide (also for firefox, thunderbird e.a.). This would be a great mechanism to deploy these certificates across a big number of systems. We for example would be using cacert to protect all kinds of servers (including web services). The firefox root certificates are viewable under: Edit-Preferences-Advanced-Encryption-View Certificated-Authorities If the package ca-certificates is not meant for this purpose or not meant to support firefox (3), this is no bug and it can be removed. Regards, Robert -- hardy cacert RA niet seen by firefox -3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205992 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205992] Re: hardy cacert RA niet seen by firefox -3
Thanks, Don't know where is the problem either. I have been finding lot's of changes for file locations used by firefox 3 in respect to firefox 2. Some packages have not been updated for these changes. gr, Robert -- hardy cacert RA niet seen by firefox -3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205992 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205992] Re: hardy cacert RA niet seen by firefox -3
So this is no bug? -- hardy cacert RA niet seen by firefox -3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205992 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189506] Re: Normal user can't access USB camera Error (-53: 'Could not claim the USB device')
I can confirm this bug with my Canon DIGITAL IXUS 800 IS (always used to
work).
As root everything works, as a normal user not. I get following messages:
An error occurred in the io-library ('Could not claim the USB device'): Could
not claim interface 0 (Operation not permitted). Make sure no other program or
kernel module (such as sdc2xx, stv680, spca50x) is using the device and you
have read/write access to the device.
*** Error (-53: 'Could not claim the USB device') ***
Strace points to a permission error:
open(/dev/bus/usb/005/005, O_RDWR)= -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
open(/dev/bus/usb/005/005, O_RDONLY) = 4
ioctl(4, USBDEVFS_GETDRIVER, 0xbfd653b4) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted)
ioctl(4, USBDEVFS_CLAIMINTERFACE, 0xbfd654d4) = -1 EPERM (Operation not
permitted)
Manually changing the group permissions recursively for /dev/bus/usb/005
to plugdev solves the problem.
It looks like udev is not working properly. I also noticed
/etc/udev/rules.d/45-libgphoto2.rules is not installed, I copied this
file from feisty to no avail. I am not very good with udev, If somebody
could point me out what to do, this bug can be solved.
--
Normal user can't access USB camera Error (-53: 'Could not claim the USB
device')
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189506
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 185752] Re: dbus and f-spot not does not start f-spot
My installation is hardy v_6 fspot 0.4.2-0ubuntu2 dbus 1.1.20-1ubuntu1 f-spot-import works for my camera Canon IXUS 800 IS when started manually however dbus does noet start the program automatically (used to work in gutsy) in preferences-Removable media: f-spot is configured in import photos when device is connected. Do I need to configure udev, and so, how to do this? -- dbus and f-spot not does not start f-spot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185752 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194774] Re: Firefox 3.0 crashed playing after 3 or 4 movies from Youtube
I can confirm this crash after 3 or 4 times playing a flash movie from you tube DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu hardy (development branch) -- Firefox 3.0 crashed playing after 3 or 4 movies from Youtube https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201915] [NEW] Installing hardy-alpha-6 + upgrade breaks apt
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: base-installer Release: hardy-alpha 6 Item: installation problem with server installation disk Problem description: Install hardy alpha 6, reboot and execute apt-get update and apt-get upgrade 1) ufw has a configuration problem, the upgrade process ends with an error 2) apt gets broken 3) system does not reboot More specific description of apt problem: apt-get update gives a memory error using a wrong free() statement this appears to happen in the http module of apt Expected result: upgrade with no error, fully functional apt, a system which can still boot ** Affects: base-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: installer ubuntu-standard -- Installing hardy-alpha-6 + upgrade breaks apt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201915 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201915] Re: Installing hardy-alpha-6 + upgrade breaks apt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 201673 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201673 This seems to be a dupe of bug #201673. After pinning the libc6 version as described in specified bug the problem did not return. This bug can be marked as a duplicatie -- Installing hardy-alpha-6 + upgrade breaks apt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201915 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162832] Not possible to assign separate smtp server to account
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: thunderbird After adding a second smtp server to outgoing smtp in account settings, this smtp server can not be added to a specific account: account settings - accountname - manage identies - identity - Only default smtp server can be selected The expected behaviour is a drop down with all smtp server viewable ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Nov 15 10:28:56 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10 Package: mozilla-thunderbird 2.0.0.8~pre071022+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.7.10 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: thunderbird Uname: Linux xserver-gutsy-xen1 2.6.18-xen #1 SMP Thu Aug 9 13:33:58 CEST 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux ** Affects: thunderbird (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- Not possible to assign separate smtp server to account https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162832 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162832] Re: Not possible to assign separate smtp server to account
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10375724/Dependencies.txt -- Not possible to assign separate smtp server to account https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162832 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 114976] Proftpd terminates after SIGHUP
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: proftpd Please have a look at upstream bug: http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2930 The bug was filed originally there but deeper investigation might point at a Ubuntu specific problem. The bug was not reproduced by compiling 1.3.1rc2 ** Affects: proftpd-dfsg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Proftpd terminates after SIGHUP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114976 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 114978] Re: Proftpd terminates after SIGHUP
This must be a bug of the bugtracking system :) I am absolutely sure I filed this bug for proftpd-dfsg. I now tried it twice. Could you please shift it of to proftpd? Am I doing something wrong? gr. Robert -- Proftpd terminates after SIGHUP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114978 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 114978] Re: Proftpd terminates after SIGHUP
Sorry, I filed it for proftpd, it ended up in proftpd-dfsg (a typo) -- Proftpd terminates after SIGHUP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114978 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 114978] Proftpd terminates after SIGHUP
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: proftpd I just filed this bug, but I could not find it anymore. This is retry. Sorry if duplicate: Please have a look at upstream bug: http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2930 It seems to be Ubuntu related ** Affects: proftpd-dfsg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Proftpd terminates after SIGHUP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114978 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105790] xserver-xorg configuration with standard installer defaults to the vesa driver
Public bug reported: feisty: When using the standard installer (netboot) the configuration of xserver-xorg (/etc/X11/xorg.conf) defaults to the vesa driver and a low resolution. A lucky guess and in depth evaluation of the live cd desktop installer showed us that if the following two packages are needed before installing xserver-xorg: discover1 xresprobe When these packages are present, the xserver-xorg (re)configuration is able to provide the right configuration file. Possibly more packages are needed It could be an idea to put these packages in the dependencies of xserver-xorg. ** Affects: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- xserver-xorg configuration with standard installer defaults to the vesa driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105790 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 82335] Re: network-manager should not set offline mode when it manages no device
On a machine which has run various distributions (sarge, dapper), we had no problems with network. Using feisty and network manager, a minute after booting, the machine looses its ip number. This is before a gnome session is even started. Running dhclient solves the problem. -- network-manager should not set offline mode when it manages no device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82335 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a bug contact for knetworkmanager in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 104762] Keyboard indicator cant be added to pannel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel In feisty gnome-panel2.18.0-0ubuntu3, after upgrade, the gnome-keyboard applet crashes and can be added to the panel ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Apr 9 13:40:10 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-panel Package: gnome-panel 2.18.0-0ubuntu3 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: gnome-panel --sm-client-id default1 ProcCwd: /media/salsa/home/robert ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-panel Uname: Linux home 2.6.20-14-generic #2 SMP Mon Apr 2 20:37:49 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Keyboard indicator cant be added to pannel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 104762] Re: Keyboard indicator cant be added to pannel
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7222569/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7222570/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7222571/ProcStatus.txt -- Keyboard indicator cant be added to pannel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 104762] Re: Keyboard indicator cant be added to pannel
Sorry: can not be added to the panel! -- Keyboard indicator cant be added to pannel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 104762] Re: Keyboard indicator cant be added to pannel
Please close this bug, a restart fixed the problem. -- Keyboard indicator cant be added to pannel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57591] Re: Unopkg package manager does not open
I forgot to test the location of the profile. The home directory mentioned is located on a nfs share. Additional research now shows that the problem only exists if the .openoffice.org2 profile is located on the nfs share. Moving the profile to a local disk resolves the problem. This makes the bug of a low priority, it is more a bug for openoffice and has nothing to do with the packaging. I have filed a bug in the openoffice bugtracker thanks! -- Unopkg package manager does not open https://launchpad.net/bugs/57591 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57591] Re: Unopkg package manager does not open over NFS
This is de openoffice bug number: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68934 gr. Robert -- Unopkg package manager does not open over NFS https://launchpad.net/bugs/57591 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57591] Re: Unopkg package manager does not open
Somehow this bug was filed under amd64, the bug is observed for the normal openoffice.org x86 package -- Unopkg package manager does not open https://launchpad.net/bugs/57591 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57591] Re: Unopkg package manager does not open
The change to openoffice.org ** Changed in: openoffice.org-amd64 (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: openoffice.org-amd64 = openoffice.org -- Unopkg package manager does not open https://launchpad.net/bugs/57591 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
