** Tags added: noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059352
Title:
paramiko 2.12.0-2ubuntu4 fails autopkgtests on all architectures
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
http
This is now a mix of maybe similar seeming, but likely different issues
with different root causes, also mixing AMD / Intel GPUs.
Anyone but twelfth (OP): Please remember to post separate / new bug
reports - not here. To file a bug, use "ubuntu-bug linux" if you expect
it to be about a packaged an
Please reproduce the problem (boot to black screen). Then reboot in a way that
you can use the computer and run this without rebooting again:
sudo journalctl -k -b -1 > /tmp/kernel.log
Then attach /tmp/kernel.log to your bug report.
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
I think it would be quite helpful if any of you could file separate bug
reports of testing a fresh 24.04 install of any flavour and could gather
the full kernel log from when the system booted to black screen, with
AMD graphics. That's because this can have many different causes, and we
do not know
** Tags added: snap
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052457
Title:
libreoffice latest version not detecting my java installation
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Public security bug reported:
On Ubuntu 22.04 with Wayland, once you activate, from the Settings
application, Sharing, and Remote Desktop Sharing, it is not possible to
permanently deactivate it on the GUI.
While it is still possible to deactivate it
** Tags added: regression-release
** Summary changed:
- using snap after fresh 22.04 install with (encrypted) ZFS breaks APT, snapd
+ (Encrypted) ZFS breaks 22.04 installation
** Also affects: zfs-linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification
** Description changed:
On a freshly installed 22.04.0 amd64 Desktop with (encrypted) ZFS, removing
the Firefox snap breaks:
* the current gnome-shell session - it returns to gdm3 login prompt
* snapd - all snaps are marked 'broken'
* dpkg - dpkg status database is lost
- Reproducible
** Description changed:
- An installation of 22.04 LTS on a VM or dedicated hardware crashes the system.
- You can login again but the system (APT, snap) is broken.
+ On a freshly installed 22.04.0 amd64 Desktop with (encrypted) ZFS, removing
the Firefox snap breaks:
+ * the current gnome-shell s
** Attachment added: "Attaching video (by IRC user ravage) reproducing the bug"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1970066/+attachment/5583102/+files/1970066.webm
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
** Attachment added: "Attaching N. Buechners' output of: cat
/proc/self/mountinfo"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1970066/+attachment/5583101/+files/1970066_mountinfo.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Attachment added: "Attaching N. Buechners' output of: journalctl -b"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1970066/+attachment/5583100/+files/1970066_journal.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
Changing status to 'new' (from 'incomplete') since apport is broken.
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970066
Title:
** Package changed: ubuntu => gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970039
Title:
cannot disable Remote Desktop in Ubuntu 22.04
To manage notifications about
https://snapcraft.io/firefox
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960655
Title:
Firefox 97.0 is out since 3 days and not yet updated
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://
** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2021-21703
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948957
Title:
CVE-2021-21703: PHP-FPM oob R/W in root process leading to privil
Based on earlier comments, this seems to affect Ubuntu, too, not just
upstream netplan.
** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
For gnome-control-center, this bug report was watching
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692666 so far. While still
relevant, the Gnome Project has stopped using this bug tracker and has
since shifted to their Gitlab instance for bug tracking.
A closely related upstream bug report, which
** Tags added: focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1396379
Title:
installer uses first EFI system partition found even when directed
otherwise
To manage notifications about this b
Possible duplicate report: bug 1904724
Thanks for reporting. This is more likely a support topic, not a bug - please
provide further information if you are convinced it is a bug. Support options
(incl. free community support - on the bottom) are listed on
https://ubuntu.com/support
** Changed i
Possible duplicate report: bug 1910738
This is most likely a support topic, not a bug - please provide further
information if you are convinced it is a bug. Support options (incl. free
community support - on the bottom) are listed on
https://ubuntu.com/support
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
This is probably a 'feature' of your Sophos AV software.
talpa_* modules are part of it:
https://support.sophos.com/support/s/article/KB-37103
See also the various 'talpa' error messages in your kernel log:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/516159223/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Changed in: linux (Ubun
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
However, this bug report was filed against ubuntu-release-upgrader,
while the bug report seems to be about "Lotus Approach v 98", a software
which (to my knowledge) is not part of Ubuntu. I amn therefore changing
t
https://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/fixing-a-bug.html probably still
applies.
However, expanding the version numbers for recent releases on
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dstat shows, in "Publishing details",
shows:
"Copied from debian sid in Primary Archive for Debian GNU/Linux."
So this i
There's no "opera" package in Ubuntu, so filing bugs on the Ubuntu bug
tracker cannot succeed in having these fixed, I'm afraid.
If this is about the Opera web browser, I suggest to look for available
support channels on https://www.opera.com
** Changed in: opera (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In
I'll sum up my view on this (which I had hoped, would be yours, too):
So far, in Ubuntu, mysqld always listened on port 3306 only, and only on
the loopback interface by default. 20.04 introduced a mysql server
version which introduces the MySQL X protocol. The expectation a mysql
server administra
Hi. Thanks for reporting this issue. However, I think this is not a
software malfunction, and you're rather looking for support:
https://ubuntu.com/support
For free community support, scroll to the very bottom. Personally, I
would recommend real-time IRC support:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/Chann
** Bug watch added: gitlab.freedesktop.org/libfprint/libfprint/-/issues #196
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libfprint/libfprint/-/issues/196
** Also affects: libfprint via
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libfprint/libfprint/-/issues/196
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You r
The current installer version is 20.04.1, which comes with different
proprietary nvidia drivers.
Another problem is that your DNS resolver failed. It would be nice if
Ubiquity could detect this and re-try getting the packages which failed
to download. Maybe this makes this a wishlist bug.
For sup
** Summary changed:
- High I am having issues on Xubuntu 20.04 revolving around WiFi
+ iwl3945: Low throughput on focal / Linux 5.4
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902421
Title:
iwl3
Relevant lines from DpkgTerminalLog.txt:
Setting up linux-firmware (1.187.3) ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.4.0-51-generic
[..]
cp: cannot stat '/etc/ykluks.cfg': No such file or directory
E: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/yubikey-luks failed with return 1.
update-initramfs:
Attaching screenshot previously stored at imgur.com
** Attachment added: "ubiquity_incorrect_fs_allocation_display.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1900274/+attachment/5423474/+files/ubiquity_incorrect_fs_allocation_display.png
** Description changed:
If storage
Public bug reported:
If storage is hot-added during installer runtime, this results in the
installer incorrectly stating the amount of available storage.
Steps to reproduce:
I booted the Ubuntu 20.04.1 Desktop installer in a VM from a (virtual) CD-ROM
drive, in BIOS mode. No other storage was at
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1897299 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897299
Linux version 5.4.0-48-generic (buildd@lcy01-amd64-010) (gcc version 9.3.0
(Ubuntu 9.3.0-10ubuntu2)) #52-Ubuntu SMP Thu Sep 10 10:58:49 UTC 2020 (Ubuntu
5.4.0-48.52-generic 5.4.60)
dmesg shows repeat occur
>From CurrentDmesg.txt:
Linux version 5.4.0-45-generic (buildd@lgw01-amd64-033) (gcc version 9.3.0
(Ubuntu 9.3.0-10ubuntu2)) #49-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 26 13:38:52 UTC 2020 (Ubuntu
5.4.0-45.49-generic 5.4.55)
[0.00] DMI: Acer Nitro AN515-44/Stonic_RNS, BIOS V1.01 04/16/2020
[Firmware Bug]: AC
** Changed in: linux-lts-utopic (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892890
Title:
The eggs were off and it hurts my belly.
To manage notifications
Also related: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206109
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #206109
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206109
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
** Package changed: ubuntu => linux-meta (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888070
Title:
latest update freezes system on boot
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
htt
So, as has been previously stated here, and as is documented in section
5 of the journald.conf man page (install man-db, run 'man 5
journald.conf'), journald will, by default, limit the journals' disk
allocation to either a maximum of 10% of available disk space, or to the
absolute size of 4GB, whi
It is my impression that specifying "mtrr_gran_size/mtrr_chunk_size" when
"mtrr_cleanup: can not find optimal value" is still useful on some systems.
The latest system where I helped identifying good values (according to
https://github.com/tomreyn/linux_mtrr_size_fix) was a
Gigabyte Z97X-Gamin
** Bug watch added: GCC Bugzilla #96130
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96130
** Also affects: gcc via
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96130
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Thanks for the bug report. I'm reassigning this to (the proper?) package
- calibre is an e-book library manager.
** Project changed: calibre => linux-meta (Ubuntu)
** Tags added: bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Thanks for the fast fix of Subiquity. Personally, I continue to consider
Ubuntu installers to be affected. To me, the ability to live upgrade
Subiquity (where Internet access is available) is a nice workaround.
Could we clarify which Ubuntu releases (or their installers) are (not)
affected in that
Please update this bug report in case you have reason to believe this
status is incorrect.
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
This is not a software bug, please contact support.
Quoting UbiquitySyslog.txt:
mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877881
Title:
Can't
There is support for tasks in apt for a while now, tasksel is considered
deprecated.
sudo apt-get -V --assume-no install server^
apt-cache show server^ | awk -F: '/^Package/ {print $2}'
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Possibly related? https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204343
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #204343
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204343
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bu
TJ wrote this:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Full_Disk_Encryption_Howto_2019
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773457
Title:
Full-system encryption needs to be supported out-of-the-
There is no easy way to gracefully handle weak crypto. It has been known
for more than five years that 1024 bit (or rather <2048 bit) DH primes
need to be considered weak and should not be used - https://weakdh.org/
- GnuTLS > 3.2 does the right thing in having services which still have
not taken a
"I/O error, dev sdb, sector 82830936 flags 0" would seem to suggest this
is a hardware error (physically defective storage media sdb), have you
ruled this out, yet?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
~esserre This is not the same bug - please report it separately (run
"ubuntu-bug linux").
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804577
Title:
ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Failure creating [\_SB.S
Related links:
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=419906&state=*
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/platform/x86/hp-wmi.c
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Reference/WMI
https://lwn.net/Articles/391230/
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #201981
Will this likely make it into 20.04?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831789
Title:
Add "dis_ucode_ldr" to linux boot options for Recovery Mode
To manage notifications about this bug
Public bug reported:
I did a test install using
$ sha256sum focal-live-server-amd64.iso
28c4e38588dd3ecfe2b8b3ec9ecb9e09057671fdd362b4732dc6cb5ff0f8a539
focal-live-server-amd64.iso
(which was published at
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-live/current/focal-live-server-amd64.iso
on
A screenshot of the installer update step is attached.
** Attachment added: "Installer update screen"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1860360/+attachment/5321768/+files/installer_update_available.png
** Tags added: focal
--
You received this bug notification because
Since no later than 18.04.3 the installer offers to encrypt an LVM which
is configured during manual partitioning. I assume this solves this bug?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1750645
Public bug reported:
I did a test install using
$ sha256sum focal-live-server-amd64.iso
28c4e38588dd3ecfe2b8b3ec9ecb9e09057671fdd362b4732dc6cb5ff0f8a539
focal-live-server-amd64.iso
(which was published at
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-live/current/focal-live-server-amd64.iso
o
Watch existing bug on GNOME Gitlab. Previously, this was
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753678
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues #332
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/332
** Bug watch added: bugzilla.gnome.org/ #753678
https://bugzill
This can be a duplicate of bug 1849542 - do you agree?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859043
Title:
thunderbird completely broken after upgrade
To manage notifications about this bu
Thank you for taking the time to report this issue and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
This package failure looks like it was caused by bad ISO download,
corrupted install media, or device failure. eg. look in the logs and
you'll see messages like these :-
Jan 4 21:17:05 ubuntu kernel: [ 241.729
Public bug reported:
MySQL Server 8.0 (on Eoan) binds to / listens on *:33060/tcp (MySQL X
protocol) by default. For the classic shell it binds to
localhost:3306/tcp only, as users will have gotten used to expect.
This seems like a potentially dangerous change of defaults - users may
not expect t
While installing ESP on top of mdadm (metadata version <= 1.0) RAID-1 is
practically possible, supporting this is not: The UEFI specification
(version 2.8, sections 13.3.1.1, 13.3.3) defines the ESP as a FAT32 file
system which is located (directly) on a GPT partition. While this does
not seem to b
Hmm, sorry for putting you on the wrong path there.
We'll now need to wait for a developer / package maintainer to have a
look at this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854395
Title:
I'm not sure why I missed this when we were looking into it on IRC, but
this is apparently something involving the openssl and nss crypto
libraries / frameworks. I'm not enough of a developer to understand what
exactly seems to be the problem, though, but knowing that apache httpd
supports HTTPS wi
Just a side note: An unsupported, experimental build of xiccd 0.3.0-1 is
currently available at
https://launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/+archive/ubuntu/experimental
If you are considering to use this PPA, please make sure to read its
description first. Consider using APT pinning to only allow this o
It's now also filed at
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/issues/1290 - thanks Sebastian.
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/issues #1290
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/issues/1290
** Also affects: nautilus via
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/issues/12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1764417 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764417
Please note that I have unsubscribed off this bug report because I am no
longer experiencing it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
Until this may get mitigations in Ubuntu, this approach can be used to
(temporarily) clean up a poisoned key ring:
https://tech.michaelaltfield.net/2019/07/14/mitigating-poisoned-pgp-
certificates/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Thank you for your report.
$ host kr.archive.ubuntu.com
kr.archive.ubuntu.com is an alias for ftp.kaist.ac.kr.
ftp.kaist.ac.kr has address 103.22.220.133
This mirror server is currently unavailable. This is likely a temporary
issue. I have notified the relevant team at Canonical, who are tracking
This bug is buggy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850174
Title:
This is not a bug, please ignore - just testing
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.
** Changed in: gnome-terminal
Importance: Medium => Unknown
** Changed in: gnome-terminal
Status: Confirmed => Unknown
** Changed in: gnome-terminal
Remote watch: GNOME Bug Tracker #780622 => bugzilla.gnome.org/ #780622
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Is this something which could be supported by now?
gnome-control-center -> power seems to offer a setting to manage wi-fi
power saving but in the end this is just a wi-fi on/off switch which
immediately brings the device down/up (bug 1751954).
Looking through the details of an existing NM wireles
This appears to have been partially fixed upstream at
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/53
However, the description is still ambiguous as reported at
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/681 (now tracked
here)
It would be nice to see this fixed in
Point to currently open bug on GNOME Gitlab (which has further
references to related bug reports)
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues #681
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/681
** Changed in: gnome-control-center
Importance: Medium
Thanks for the notice, I updated the link.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/RaspberryPi?action=diff&rev2=104&rev1=103
** Package changed: ubuntu => ubuntu-docs
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
** Summary changed:
- Intel wifi 3165 not working properly in Ubuntu 18.10
+ Intel wifi 3165 not working properly in Ubuntu 19.10
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848953
Title:
Intel
** Attachment added: ""journalctl -b -1" (failed boot) for other user"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1848900/+attachment/5298524/+files/jj9k.log
** Summary changed:
- blank display with Eoan Ermine live DVD on Rysen 2200G
+ Blank display with Eoan Ermine live DVD on Ryze
I was supporting another Xubuntu 19.10 user on AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
(Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. B450 AORUS M/B450 AORUS M, BIOS F2
08/08/2018) today, whose log of a failed (standard) boot (to black
screen) showed
kernel: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 255 at
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dc
Related logs from journalctl -b:
os-prober[6348]: debug: running /usr/lib/os-probes/10zvol-test on /dev/sda5
os-prober[6351]: debug: running /usr/lib/os-probes/50mounted-tests on /dev/sda5
50mounted-tests[6361]: debug: creating device mapper device
/dev/mapper/osprober-linux-sda5
kernel: device-ma
** Also affects: zfs-linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848496
Title:
[zfs-root] device-mapper: reload ioctl on osprober-linux-
Public bug reported:
On a 19.10 (pre-release, 20191016 daily) zfs installation, running 'os-
prober' (as 'update-grub' does by default) triggers the following error
message:
x@x:~$ sudo os-prober; echo $?
device-mapper: reload ioctl on osprober-linux-sda5 failed: Device or resource
busy
Command
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will
automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:
apport-collect 1848225
This is needed since the source package assignment has been updated.
Target Netplan package
** Package changed: plan (Ubuntu) => netplan.io (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848225
Title:
netplan fails to configure wifi on rpi4 with eoan
To ma
At https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/issues/1244 it was determined
that this is a duplicate report for upstream bug
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/issues/162
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/issues #162
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/issues/162
** Cha
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1847826 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847826
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1847826
ZFS installer crashes
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
Related OOPS:
https://errors.ubuntu.com/oops/0bfbfd74-ed21-11e9-aef8-fa163e983629
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847826
Title:
ZFS installer crashes
To manage notifications about th
** Summary changed:
- ZFS installer crashes (Xubuntu)
+ ZFS installer crashes
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847826
Title:
ZFS installer crashes
To manage notifications about this
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1847826 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847826
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1847826
ZFS installer crashes (Xubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1847826 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847826
Public bug reported:
Desktop installation on a 4 GB RAM system. The following non default options
were selected:
* minimal installation
* 3rd party (proprietary) software
* ZFS
Shortly after the installat
As seen on the duplicate bug 1847848, 2 GB can trigger the installers'
OOM killer. With 3 GB, installation (with ZFS) succeeded for me (but 3
GB is probably still too little for a ZFS Desktop system, so I agree
more is much better there).
Maybe the easiest way to fix this for the 19.10 release is
Public bug reported:
Doing a default installation with the ZFS option enabled, on a system
with 2.0 GB physical RAM (actually a Virtualbox VM), the installation
went out of memory and OOM killer kicked in, stopping the desktop and
leaving me with a shell which just printed OOM messages for additio
Based on the events in UbiquitySyslog.txt (first error seems to be
"ubiquity: cannot resolve path '/dev/sda4'"), this is likely a duplicate
of bug 1847826
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
I don't seem to be able to reproduce this, so I hope the log files allow
for concluding something.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847843
Title:
eoan-desktop-amd64 20191011 zfs instal
eoan-live-server-amd64.iso daily 20191011 lacks the /lib/firmware path.
eoan-desktop-amd64.iso daily 20191011 has the /lib/firmware path as well as
bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw.
Rob Thomas: Could you confirm that you tested the live-server installer?
** Tags added: amd64 eoan
--
You receive
Public bug reported:
I just did a default installation. Had switched back and forth between
not enabling (default) and enabling 3rd party drivers a bit, but in the
end decided to go with the default. Then, after selecting ZFS install,
the installer crashed with a message saying so.
ProblemType: B
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 17.04 (zesty) reached end-of-life on January 13, 2018.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it any more.
** Tags added: amd64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788702
Title:
package snapd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-removal script returned error e
Potential dupe of bug 1788702?
** Tags added: eoan
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805874
Title:
package snapd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: installed
snapd package po
Please disregard my above comment. Further testing shows the default
installer option can also cause /cdrom to be empty.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847457
Title:
No /cdrom mounte
I tested installing using the 20191009 daily installer in UEFI mode
several times today.
Using the default (boot to live system/desktop) grub menu option, /cdrom was
always mounted.
Using the grub menu option to immediately run the installer, /cdrom was never
mounted.
Of course, this could stil
1 - 100 of 313 matches
Mail list logo