[Bug 1798818] [NEW] DNS server is not updated after VPN is established

2018-10-19 Thread Vide
Public bug reported: The exact same VPN configuration (both server-client) was working perfectly with Ubuntu 18.04. After upgrading, the DNS server is not updated with the one pushed by the VPN server. It's not updated even if I set it to MANUAL and specify the IP address in the VPN

[Bug 1798049] Re: ssh ConnectTimeout is obeyed only on 1st ConnectionAttempt

2018-10-16 Thread Vide
I've opened a bug report upstream https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2918 because friends not using Ubuntu confirmed the same erratic behavior even with newer OpenSSH versions (7.8) ** Bug watch added: OpenSSH Portable Bugzilla #2918 https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2918

[Bug 1798049] [NEW] ssh ConnectTimeout is obeyed only on 1st ConnectionAttempt

2018-10-16 Thread Vide
timeout on the second attempt. Example of the error: $ time ssh - -o ConnectTimeout=2 -o ConnectionAttempts=2 -o StrictHostKeyChecking=false -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null 1.2.3.4 OpenSSH_7.6p1 Ubuntu-4, OpenSSL 1.0.2n 7 Dec 2017 debug1: Reading configuration data /home/vide/.ssh/config

[Bug 1709699] Re: gpk-update-viewer fails with "Spawn of helper 'usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/aptcc/get-distro-upgrade.py' failed ... (No such file or directory)"

2018-04-28 Thread Vide
same here. Ubuntu 17.10. Intel i5 2500k. gnome-shell version 3.26.2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1709699 Title: gpk-update-viewer fails with "Spawn of helper

[Bug 1574041] Re: xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr not part of current TD ep_index 3 comp_code 1

2016-05-10 Thread Vide
Going back to 4.4.0-21 fixes the problem for me, so I don't know if I'm hitting the same bug as the bug reporter -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574041 Title: xhci_hcd :00:14.0:

[Bug 1574041] Re: xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr not part of current TD ep_index 3 comp_code 1

2016-05-10 Thread Vide
In my case, with the current USB hub I have, it started with the latest 16.04 kernel upgrade. I am running this version: Linux shadow 4.4.0-22-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP Thu May 5 16:53:32 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1574041] Re: xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr not part of current TD ep_index 3 comp_code 1

2016-05-10 Thread Vide
What happen inb my case is that I have a Logitech mouse and a Cherry keyboard connected to the external USB, it works perfectly if I boot up the kernel with the hub already plugged in but if I unplug the hub and then plug it again, after a few seconds, the mouse stops working (the keyboard still

[Bug 1521862] Re: Clementine crashes with "assert failure ***stack smashing detected***"

2016-01-04 Thread Vide
As of today i have the same problem. I am running Ubuntu 15.10 clementine.desktop[26653]: *** stack smashing detected ***: clementine terminated -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1521862

[Bug 974060] Re: next_tab and prev_tab keybindings stop working if changed

2013-04-15 Thread Vide
Updated to Ubuntu 13.04, the bug is still there :( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974060 Title: next_tab and prev_tab keybindings stop working if changed To manage notifications

[Bug 974060] Re: next_tab and prev_tab keybindings stop working if changed

2013-01-30 Thread Vide
Just tested that branch, and now it works again! Thank you very much! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974060 Title: next_tab and prev_tab keybindings stop working if changed To

[Bug 1066998] Re: empathy-chat crashed with SIGSEGV in _dbus_list_unlink()

2012-11-07 Thread Vide
It has just happened to me as well, I had just tried to open a new chat with a jabber account, already had 3 chat tabs opened. Not very useful I know but that's what I was doing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 974060] Re: next_tab and prev_tab keybindings stop working if changed

2012-08-03 Thread Vide
It happens to other keybindings as well, like split_horiz and split_vert, even if the modified keybinding is stored in Terminator's config file. ~/.config/terminator$ cat config [global_config] enabled_plugins = InactivityWatch, ActivityWatch, TerminalShot, LaunchpadCodeURLHandler,

[Bug 730993] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.38/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:53 suspend_test_finish 0x89/0x90()

2012-07-28 Thread Vide
Right now I don't have that Macbook anymore so I cannot tell you if it's still existing with the current kernel (upstream or Ubuntu flavored). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730993

[Bug 887983] Re: Preview pane does not refresh after previewing a very large message

2011-11-09 Thread Vide
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887983 Title: Preview pane does not refresh after previewing a very large message To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 887983] [NEW] Preview pane does not refresh after previewing a very large message

2011-11-09 Thread Vide
Public bug reported: Step to reproduce: 1) receive a very large ( 210k) plain text message (no attachements, just text in the body) 2) click on it and get it shown in the preview pane 3) select another message (same folder, another folder, doesn't matter) and see that the preview pane always

[Bug 787551] Re: ntpdate 4.2.6p2@1.2194-o: no server suitable for synchronization found - works with 4.2.4p8@1.1612-o

2011-06-16 Thread Vide
Hi will this be fixed to Natty as well? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787551 Title: ntpdate 4.2.6p2@1.2194-o: no server suitable for synchronization found - works

[Bug 787551] Re: ntpdate 4.2.6p2@1.2194-o: no server suitable for synchronization found - works with 4.2.4p8@1.1612-o

2011-06-16 Thread Vide
Hi will this be fixed to Natty as well? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787551 Title: ntpdate 4.2.6p2@1.2194-o: no server suitable for synchronization found - works with

[Bug 688816] Re: Don't create windows over the launcher

2011-03-28 Thread Vide
I'd like to ask that even when the user maximezes the window, it should not overlap the launcher area (thus making it hide) just as it doesn't overlap the menu bar. Should I open a new bug or this is the right place to ask such a thing? -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 730993] [NEW] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.38/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:53 suspend_test_finish 0x89/0x90()

2011-03-07 Thread Vide
to be restarted. Architecture: i386 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: vide 1356 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0x5044 irq 43' Mixer name : 'SigmaTel STAC9221 A1

[Bug 730993] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.38/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:53 suspend_test_finish 0x89/0x90()

2011-03-07 Thread Vide
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730993 Title: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.38/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:53 suspend_test_finish 0x89/0x90() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 669940] [NEW] Keyutils is not installed automatically when upgrading 10.04 10.10

2010-11-02 Thread Vide
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: keyutils I'm mounting a remote cifs share using sec=krb5 to mount it passwordless (auth token provided by kerberos) and it worked well in Ubuntu 10.04. After upgradi ng to 10.10, it's broken with a mount error(2): No such file or directory Refer to the

[Bug 669940] Re: Keyutils is not installed automatically when upgrading 10.04 10.10

2010-11-02 Thread Vide
-- Keyutils is not installed automatically when upgrading 10.04 10.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669940 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 669940] Re: Keyutils is not installed automatically when upgrading 10.04 10.10

2010-11-02 Thread Vide
in 10.04 it is smbfs which pulls keyring in. something changed apparently cause I do had smbfs installed in 10.04 prior to upgrade -- Keyutils is not installed automatically when upgrading 10.04 10.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669940 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 34813] Re: gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs

2010-10-05 Thread Vide
I'm using Ubunto 10.10 and the bug, with gedit and a fstab mounted CIFS share, is still there. Steps to reproduce (the usuals): - create a new file with gedit in the remote share - type something - Ctrl+S to save - type something - Ctrl+S to save: bug happens! And to all the people/developers

[Bug 653623] [NEW] gvfs-gphoto2 eating 100% CPU and no I/O operations

2010-10-02 Thread Vide
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gvfs When I connect to Ubuntu 10.10 my Canon Powershot SX20 IS it's detected and I can browse with Nautilus the pictures, but when I try any expensive I/O operation (say, copy a picture or a movie), gvfs-gphoto2 process eats almost 100% CPU and no

[Bug 653623] Re: gvfs-gphoto2 eating 100% CPU and no I/O operations

2010-10-02 Thread Vide
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653623/+attachment/163/+files/Dependencies.txt -- gvfs-gphoto2 eating 100% CPU and no I/O operations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653623 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 99437] Re: umount: mount disagrees with the fstab

2010-09-28 Thread Vide
I'm experiencing the same as hcmeyr, Ubuntu 10.10 latest packages installed. mounting a cifs share present in fstab works with mount mountpoint but umount mountpoint fails with a mount disagrees with the fstab. sudo umount mountpoint works as expected -- umount: mount disagrees with the fstab

[Bug 534629] Re: AssumeDefaultDomain does not work

2010-05-20 Thread Vide
It seems that it works OK on amd64 but it doesn't work on i386. I've added the same repo on both machines and the version is the same a part from the architecture Marcos, Alexander, Ninjix, are you using i386 or amd64? -- AssumeDefaultDomain does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534629

[Bug 582153] [NEW] Screen doesn't accept login names longer than 20 chars

2010-05-18 Thread Vide
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: screen GNU screen only accept login names with less than 21 characters. This is a problem with Ubuntu 10.04 cause if you're using likewise-open as authenticating method it defaults (and it cannot be changed, see

[Bug 582153] Re: Screen doesn't accept login names longer than 20 chars

2010-05-18 Thread Vide
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48645205/Dependencies.txt -- Screen doesn't accept login names longer than 20 chars https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582153 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 534629] Re: AssumeDefaultDomain does not work

2010-05-18 Thread Vide
Now that is strange.. I've got a machine where the fix works (mine) and another on a colleague's PC with the same exact configuration (copied from my machine), the same exact likewise-open build (from your PPA) and there it still doesn't work. It accepts logins only with DOMAIN\username, not

[Bug 534629] Re: AssumeDefaultDomain does not work

2010-05-14 Thread Vide
It works for me too but there is still a problem/different behaviour respect to 9.10. Now when I login I've always get DOMAIN\username as my unix username while before it was simply username. This poses problems with, for example, screen which complain about LoginName too long. Is this a bug or a

[Bug 534629] Re: AssumeDefaultDomain does not work

2010-05-14 Thread Vide
Gerald: I simply try to execute screen with screen :) My unix name is now 8 (domain name) + 1 (slash) + 14 (username) so it sums 23. And I can't change anything in my scenario. Any suggestion? -- AssumeDefaultDomain does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534629 You received this bug

[Bug 534629] Re: AssumeDefaultDomain does not work

2010-05-14 Thread Vide
Yeah, I saw this too. There's a patch for that but it seems that was ignored. http://www.mail-archive.com/screen-de...@gnu.org/msg00186.html I'll open a wish in Ubuntu Launchpad so Ubuntu could apply this patch. If this is the new and definitive likewise behavior, more people are going to see

[Bug 395040] Re: Send message to group disabled

2010-05-07 Thread Vide
this was already fixed by upstream ** Changed in: kdenetwork (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- Send message to group disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395040 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdenetwork in

[Bug 567327] Re: Machine swaps too much, leaving too much buffers in RAM

2010-05-07 Thread Vide
Ok, this seems fixed with the final release ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- Machine swaps too much, leaving too much buffers in RAM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567327 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 568422] Re: Upgrading from likewise-open5 changes home directory locations

2010-04-27 Thread Vide
This happens here as well. Updated from 9.10 to 10.04 beta2 (now on rc, tomorrow on final :) via update-manager, I had to create a symlink for /home/likewise-open pointing to /home. This is a showstopper for me upgrading all the workstation I manage from 9.10 to 10.04 -- Upgrading from

[Bug 567327] [NEW] Machine swaps too much, leaving too much buffers in RAM

2010-04-20 Thread Vide
Public bug reported: $ uname -a Linux pc-0707-007 2.6.32-21-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 16 08:09:38 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ cat /proc/sys/vm/swappiness 0 Ihave 4GB of RAM and with program using 1.5GB of RAM, the kernel decides that even with swappines set to 0 it should swap to disk

[Bug 57233] Re: Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

2010-03-13 Thread Vide
why did you mark this as invalid? -- Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 387900] Re: Could not create a python ScriptEngine for the Python Widget

2009-10-14 Thread Vide
I can confirm lovinglinux comment. Just dist-upgraded Karmic today, KDE restart and all my python based plasmoid are gone. Please fix it before release, thanks! -- Could not create a python ScriptEngine for the Python Widget https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387900 You received this bug

[Bug 286828] Re: Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10

2009-08-04 Thread Vide
Andrew: I'm no Ubuntu dev but I've been suffering this bug when first appeared and the bug is clearly and without any doubt on the Samba server side. With Samba server I don't mean upstream Samba code but the Samba server present for example in Debian Etch (and other OS/devices too, like your

[Bug 286828] Re: Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10

2009-08-04 Thread Vide
Andrew: I'm no Ubuntu dev but I've been suffering this bug when first appeared and the bug is clearly and without any doubt on the Samba server side. With Samba server I don't mean upstream Samba code but the Samba server present for example in Debian Etch (and other OS/devices too, like your

[Bug 395040] [NEW] Send message to group disabled

2009-07-03 Thread Vide
Public bug reported: Using KDE 4.3RC1 (and formerly Beta2) from deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/kubuntu-ppa/backports/ubuntu jaunty main the Send message to group option in the context menu when clicking on a group name is grayed out, making impossible to send messages to group. This is a very

[Bug 286828] Re: Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10

2009-01-19 Thread Vide
Thierry, I've just tried what simonm said and no errors here, it all seems fine (mounting a Debian 3.0.24-6etch10 samba server from Ubuntu 8.10 with 2.6.27-11 kernel and the nodfs option) % echo 1 2 3 test_file % cat test_file 1 2 3 % echo 4 5 6 test_file % cat test_file 1 2 3 4 5 6 -- Access

[Bug 213754] Re: dell xps 410n won't reboot - regression

2008-12-24 Thread Vide
Yes, this is still an issue with Optiplex 330 and Ubuntu Intrepid, even if running the very latest 2.6.27-11-generic kernel -- dell xps 410n won't reboot - regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 231667] Re: Broadcom BCM5722 (tg3) acts weird on reboot

2008-12-24 Thread Vide
Hi, I'm running Ubuntu Intrepid with kernel 2.6.27-11 and a Broadcom tg3 ethernet controller 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetLink BCM5787 Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express (rev 02) and I have a similiar problem, but only with DHCP. I have to issue 2 consecutives DHCP requests

[Bug 231667] Re: Broadcom BCM5722 (tg3) acts weird on reboot

2008-12-24 Thread Vide
For the record, it's a Dell Optiplex 330 (a workstation) -- Broadcom BCM5722 (tg3) acts weird on reboot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231667 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 213754] Re: dell xps 410n won't reboot - regression

2008-12-24 Thread Vide
Yeah, I forgot to mention that. reboot=bios (reboot=b is just the same) still works around the problem. I attach the dmidecode output as requested ** Attachment added: dmidecode output http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20708091/dmidecode-optiplex330.txt -- dell xps 410n won't reboot -

[Bug 286828] Re: Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10

2008-12-23 Thread Vide
I was affected by this problem as well and I can confirm that using 2.6.27-11 and the nodfs mount option the problem is solved. I tested this on x86 and x86_64. I can add that with the -9 kernel the /proc/fs/cifs/LinuxExtensionsEnabled workarond wasn't working anymore (with previous revisions it

[Bug 286828] Re: Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10

2008-12-23 Thread Vide
I was affected by this problem as well and I can confirm that using 2.6.27-11 and the nodfs mount option the problem is solved. I tested this on x86 and x86_64. I can add that with the -9 kernel the /proc/fs/cifs/LinuxExtensionsEnabled workarond wasn't working anymore (with previous revisions it

[Bug 286828] Re: Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10

2008-12-23 Thread Vide
Tom: as Thierry clearly stated you have to use a recent kernel from the intrepid-proposed repository. The 2.6.27-9 you're using is still broken -- Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286828 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 286828] Re: Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10

2008-12-23 Thread Vide
Tom, but your mount at bootime issue it's a completely different topic (do you put the _netdev label in the fstab options? it's mandatory for network shares). -- Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286828 You received this bug

[Bug 298208] Re: keyutils is broken (keyctl segfaults trivially)

2008-12-23 Thread Vide
Hi it seems that with latest 2.6.27-11 (from intrepid-proposed) cifs and kerberos work again! I can mount my remote share with the sec=krb5i option and I don't need to type a password to get it mounted (although a Password: prompt is shown anyway, just hitting enter or putting password= in the

[Bug 298208] Re: keyutils is broken (keyctl segfaults trivially)

2008-11-27 Thread Vide
Argh, I've hit the smae bug :( While reading https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/236830 I thought we were already there with SSO auth against CIFS exports but with Intrepid I'm experiencing the same dmesg output (created I suspect with my first mount.cifs sec=krb5i which

[Bug 298208] Re: keyutils is broken (keyctl segfaults trivially)

2008-11-27 Thread Vide
My dmesg output, if it helps [701194.599816] Oops: [#1] SMP [701194.599820] Modules linked in: udf crc_itu_t isofs loop nls_iso8859_1 vfat fat usb_storage libusual

[Bug 126330] Re: KMail: e-mail autocompletion from LDAP source doesn't work

2008-11-22 Thread Vide
I can confirm that it works with Kubuntu 8.10 Intrepid (KDE 4.1) -- KMail: e-mail autocompletion from LDAP source doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/126330 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 126330] Re: KMail: e-mail autocompletion from LDAP source doesn't work

2008-03-10 Thread Vide
I can confirm this bug, I'm using KMail 1.9.9 Enterprise branch in Kubuntu Gutsy and the bug is present at least from Feisty... previously it worked rather well, so it seems a regression. This https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdepim/+bug/126330/comments/3 workaround didn't fix the

[Bug 57233] Re: Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

2007-11-27 Thread Vide
Ok, I was missing linux-backports-modules-server, once installed, the system booted up, and now is up running with all the disks correctly detected. Thanks for the fix! :) -- Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57233 You

[Bug 57233] Re: Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

2007-11-27 Thread Vide
Ok, this seemed strange to me in fact... well, I'll wait for a linux- modules-server update in the proposed updates repo, let me know when there are news, it's a non-production machine so I can reboot it quite easily if you need more testing -- Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached

[Bug 57233] Re: Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

2007-11-21 Thread Vide
Just upgrade from dapper-proposed to 2.6.15-51.63and now I've got a kernel panic. I attach the screenshot of the panic ** Attachment added: Kernel panic output http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10497363/dsc00167.jpg -- Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

[Bug 57233] Re: Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

2007-07-04 Thread Vide
:00:00.0 0600: 1166:0017 (rev 32) Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- :00:00.1 0600: 1166:0017 Control: I/O- Mem-

[Bug 25380] Re: k3b has problems using a USB writer

2006-11-04 Thread Vide
I'm sorry that I can't help you anymore tracking this problem but I do not have anymore access to the hardware on which I was experiencing problems. I hope other people that could reproduce this bug can help :) -- k3b has problems using a USB writer https://launchpad.net/bugs/25380 --

[Bug 57233] Re: Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

2006-08-22 Thread Vide
-- Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST https://launchpad.net/bugs/57233 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 57233] Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

2006-08-22 Thread Vide
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6-386 I own a Dell PowerEdge 1600SC with a LSI 1030ST controller and I can't see the attached disk with the latest Dapper kernel image revision, while wi th standard 6.06 version (2.6.15-23) I can mount the disk smoothly. ** Affects:

[Bug 57233] Re: Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

2006-08-22 Thread Vide
I can say that even with more recent kernels (2.6.17 on latest knoppix, for example) I cannot see the disk, while with Ubuntu 2.6.15-23 (server or desktop flavour) as said, it works. -- Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST https://launchpad.net/bugs/57233 --

[Bug 57233] Re: Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

2006-08-22 Thread Vide
-- Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST https://launchpad.net/bugs/57233 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 57233] Re: Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

2006-08-22 Thread Vide
Here it is lspci output :00:00.0 Host bridge: Broadcom GCNB-LE Host Bridge (rev 32) :00:00.1 Host bridge: Broadcom GCNB-LE Host Bridge :00:02.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 02) :00:0e.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies