[Bug 1807513] Re: problem loading UEFI certificate

2020-10-27 Thread Vladimir Yerilov
No I was wrong. In my case this only happens with the certificate with a strange Issuer name like "x00d\x00b\x00_\x00M\x00a\x00n\x00u\x00f\x00a\x00c\x00t\x00u\x00r\x00e\x002\x000\x001\x005\x000\x006\x001\x007". Only this certificate fails to load. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1897153] Re: Automount fails due to SSSD config (Groovy Gorilla)

2020-10-24 Thread Vladimir Yerilov
Hi Andreas, I'm not using autofs, frankly, I chimed in here just to add that sssd package had been explicitly pulled and installed during the update to groovy. And that it failed to start for reasons unknown, too. I didn't feel like tinkering with the problem, and given that I don't need sssd in

[Bug 1897153] Re: Automount fails due to SSSD config (Groovy Gorilla)

2020-09-29 Thread Vladimir Yerilov
Hi, I had no intention to use sssd, it was pulled and installed during the update. I am sure I had no sssd installed on focal as I am browsing now through the image of my root partition created before the update was started. Yes, I still have update logs. -- You received this bug notification b

[Bug 1897153] Re: Automount fails due to SSSD config (Groovy Gorilla)

2020-09-29 Thread Vladimir Yerilov
This bug "affects" me too. In a way that sssd fails to start. Also any attempt to run something like "systemctl enable foo.service" is now being rejected after entering correct password in pkexec popup window, so I have to use "sudo systemctl enable foo.service". Log show sssd.service and its "s

[Bug 1889416] Re: pulseaudio.service: Start request repeated too quickly.

2020-08-04 Thread Vladimir Yerilov
I'm here to just confirm the bug and that your workaround is working. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889416 Title: pulseaudio.service: Start request repeated too quickly. To

[Bug 1807513] Re: problem loading UEFI certificate

2020-02-21 Thread Vladimir Yerilov
This happens when `mokutil --use-db` setting is applied. With `--ignore- db` this doesn't happen. I suppose this is only applicable for situaltions where Secure Boot's db / KEK / PK are modified by the user. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1798363] Re: i2c_hid i2c-ELAN1200:00: i2c_hid_get_input: incomplete report (16/65535)

2019-04-04 Thread Vladimir Yerilov
>> status: Confirmed → Fix Released Any hint where can I find relevant patch? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1798363 Title: i2c_hid i2c-ELAN1200:00: i2c_hid_get_input: incomplete

[Bug 1822464] Re: The installer ignores deliberately selected /boot/efi partition

2019-03-31 Thread Vladimir Yerilov
** Summary changed: - iThe installer ignores deliberately selected /boot/efi partition + The installer ignores deliberately selected /boot/efi partition -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1

[Bug 1822464] Re: iThe installer ignores deliberately selected /boot/efi partition

2019-03-31 Thread Vladimir Yerilov
** Description changed: I've noticed that Ubuntu installer ignores explicitly selected /boot/efi partition. I have 2 ssd drives: the first one is nvme (/dev/nvme0n1) the second one is sata (/dev/sda), both have their EFI partitions for multiboot purposes. During the installation process the i

[Bug 1822464] [NEW] iThe installer ignores deliberately selected /boot/efi partition

2019-03-31 Thread Vladimir Yerilov
Public bug reported: I've noticed that Ubuntu installer ignores explicitly selected /boot/efi partition. I have 2 ssd drives: the first one is nvme (/dev/nvme0n1) the second one is sata (/dev/sda), both have their EFI partitions for multiboot purposes. During the installation process the instal

[Bug 1064490] Re: USB Gaming Mouse 04d9:a078 not working

2013-10-20 Thread Vladimir Yerilov
This bug hasn't been fixed yet?! I was very surprised to face it during testing one of Saucy's dailies a week ago. It is ridiculous to recompile kernel each time one receives update because of one incorrect value. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic