[Bug 1731646] Re: missing qDebug output when creating QT applications

2018-01-27 Thread Yusef Maali
I upgraded from 17.04 to 17.10 just yesterday and I was affected from
the same issue.

I'm sorry to say, @mitya57, you intentionally broke the qDebug _default_ 
behaviour (and Fedora as well).
qDebug()'ing something should result in printing in the console output.

If there's issues with some applications that result in too much verbose
output, should be fixed in those applications, not shutting up the whole
QT qDebug.

Anyway, this should be warned to the user in some way during the
upgrade.

just my 2 cents.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1731646

Title:
  missing qDebug output when creating QT applications

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-src/+bug/1731646/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 760632] Re: Resizing Konsole crashes the whole system

2011-07-07 Thread Yusef Maali
@Christopher
Yes, I have other problems for sure... :(
Disabling desktop effect does not solve the problem, I have already tried.
I have a Windows installation, but it is inside VirtualBox. I don't have any OS 
other than Linux.

This situation started with a dist-upgrade of a few days ago.
As far as I remember, it has only upgraded nvidia-current and xserver-xorg 
stuff. Before this upgrade all works like a charm, as ever!

But it is very very strange that downgrading xorg and nvidia-current
doesn't solve the problem. (this is why I'm thinking of an imminent
graphics card failure).


@Ivan:
Nope, I have an old GeForce 8500GT (G86 family). Thks!


@All:
I think to be off-topic here...
Anyway I noticed that some seconds before the system totally crash, the X 
process goes to 100% of cpu utilization.
Then the system becomes totally unresponsiveness, even through ssh.

Thanks for your help!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760632

Title:
  Resizing Konsole crashes the whole system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/760632/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 760632] Re: Resizing Konsole crashes the whole system

2011-07-06 Thread Yusef Maali
All the workarounds proposed here haven't worked for me.

I have had to revert to the nv driver to have a usable system.

I tried to downgrade xorg and the binary driver but my system still freeze.
I tried (with the current xorg) all the binaries driver from nvidia (270, 275 
and the beta 280) and none of them work for me...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760632

Title:
  Resizing Konsole crashes the whole system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/760632/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 760632] Re: Resizing Konsole crashes the whole system

2011-07-06 Thread Yusef Maali
@Vlada: yes, I have tried both.
I have tried the binary directly from nvidia site, not from the repository.
Check here: http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=122606

I was not able to use the nouveau driver due to some kind of libdrm
incompatibility...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760632

Title:
  Resizing Konsole crashes the whole system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/760632/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 760632] Re: Resizing Konsole crashes the whole system

2011-07-06 Thread Yusef Maali
@vlado:
I've tried all the binaries available in the repositories, then I've started to 
try all the binaries from official nvidia releases (the lastest 270, 275 and 
280).

None of them works.

My issue is not strictly related to konsole.
The system freezes whenever I have lot of GPU intensive task, ie a lot of 
transparencies, video player streaming or *flash player* running.
With Adobe Flash Player I'm having screen redrawing problem from maverik and 
natty has not solved it.

I'm starting to have the doubt that this may be a the signal of an
imminent hardware failure...

About nouveau:
I have clean my system from all components of other drivers... I'm quite sure 
the problem isn't this...

Thks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760632

Title:
  Resizing Konsole crashes the whole system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/760632/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 774780] [NEW] Upgrading from Maverik to Natty has replaced mdadm with dmraid, making the system unbootable

2011-05-01 Thread Yusef Maali
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: base-installer

I have upgraded from Maverik to Natty, x86_64 Desktop release.

After the upgrade, the initramfs was configured to load dmraid drivers
instead mdadm driver, making the system fails to boot.

I have the following disk configuration:

/dev/sda
/dev/sda1 - NTFS
/dev/sda2 - raid partition (md0 - / - raid 0)
/dev/sda3 - ext2 (/boot)

/dev/sdb
/dev/sdb1 - raid partition (md1 - /home - raid 1)

/dev/sdc
/dev/sdc1 - NTFS
/dev/sdc2 - raid partition (md0 - / - raid 0)
/dev/sdc3 - swapfs

/dev/sdd
/dev/sdd1 - raid partition (md1 - /home - raid 1)


Before the upgrade, the system booted from the /dev/sda3 partition and then 
mounted the md0 partition to continue the boot process.
After the upgrade the system was not able to see the mdX partitions, trying to 
mount a series of dm-X partitions, that made the boot process to fail in the 
very first stage.

I have booted the system with a live Natty x86_64, but I have had the same 
problem. The live was (and is) not able to see the mdadm partitions.
I solved the issue booting with a Maverik live (also Lucid works), that is able 
to correctly see the mdX partitions after having installed the mdadm package.

I have chrooted into the broken installation, purged the dmraid package
and forced the re-installation of the mdadm package.

Now my upgraded Natty x86_64 is working like a charm :)
Please ask me for more information, if needed.

Thanks for your great work!
Yusef Maali

** Affects: base-installer (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: dmraid maverik mdadm natty ubuntu upgrade

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774780

Title:
  Upgrading from Maverik to Natty has replaced mdadm with dmraid, making
  the system unbootable

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 591024] Re: Can't edit Auto eth0 connection makes impossible to use static Ip / custom connections in Kubuntu/Kde

2010-12-19 Thread Yusef Maali
Hi Fabio,

I'm wondering why you have marked as invalid this bug.
It is still present in Kubuntu 10.10...

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591024

Title:
  Can't edit Auto eth0 connection makes impossible to use static Ip / custom 
connections in Kubuntu/Kde

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 661654] Re: pam_motd doesn't rename /var/run/motd.new if run-parts exits with errors

2010-10-19 Thread Yusef Maali
Hi Steve,

if this behavior is by design, I will anyway suggest to log the error somewhere 
(syslog?).
I have had lost a lot of time figuring out what the matter was.
If pam_motd had has logged the error, I would have solved the issue in a 
fraction of time.

Dustin, it isn't cpu-checks related.
During the upgrade I lost the update-notifier-common package and, with it, a 
lot of scripts (included the cpu-checks script).


Thanks you all for your great work on Ubuntu!
Yusef

-- 
pam_motd doesn't rename /var/run/motd.new if run-parts exits with errors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661654
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 661654] [NEW] pam_motd doesn't rename /var/run/motd.new if run-parts exits with errors

2010-10-16 Thread Yusef Maali
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: libpam-modules

** Problem:
pam_motd module creates the file /var/run/motd.new but doesn't rename it into 
/var/run/motd.
The /etc/motd symlink points to /var/run/motd and at each user login are shown 
old informations.

** Repeatable:
Yes, always

** How to repeat:
You need to force run-parts /etc/update-motd.d to exit with errors.
To complete this task just add in the update-motd.d chain a script that exits 
with error or a symlink to a script that doesn't exist.


** Explanation:
I discover this issue while upgrading from lucid to maverik (server edition).
For some reason, the package update-notifier-common was removed and I was full 
of broken symlinks in the update-motd.d chain.
At each ssh login I was presented with stale informations.

Looking into the pam_motd.c code I found the problem.
The module performs a system(run-parts /etc/update-motd.d  
/var/run/motd.new) call, that returns a non-zero value if run-parts exits with 
errors.
If the system() call returns a non-zero value, the following rename() call is 
not executed.
The file /var/run/motd.new is *always* created and written to disk with the 
output of the working scripts.
We are in the situation where the /var/run/motd.new is updated but never 
renamed into /var/run/motd, if some scripts have bugs or exit with errors.

I have attached a patch that should solve this problem.
The rename() call is not blocked by the system() call and moreover if run-parts 
exits with a non-zero value, pam_syslog is used to log the error and help 
sysadmins to find rapidly the problem.
Within the patch, the rename() call is always executed, even if run-parts fails 
totally and /var/run/motd.new is not created.
In this case, the rename() call doesn't perform the renaming and returns a 
non-zero value (but we are not interested in it).

Thanks,
Yusef

** Affects: pam (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: motd pam run-parts ssh update-motd.d

-- 
pam_motd doesn't rename /var/run/motd.new if run-parts exits with errors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661654
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 661654] Re: pam_motd doesn't rename /var/run/motd.new if run-parts exits with errors

2010-10-16 Thread Yusef Maali

** Patch added: pam_motd.patch
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661654/+attachment/1696218/+files/pam_motd.patch

-- 
pam_motd doesn't rename /var/run/motd.new if run-parts exits with errors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661654
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 399071] Re: pam_motd: assume update-motd responsibilities

2010-10-16 Thread Yusef Maali
Hi Dustin,

I'm sorry for having written in the wrong place.
I have filed the bug right now (#661654)

Thanks,
Yusef

-- 
pam_motd: assume update-motd responsibilities
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399071
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 399071] Re: pam_motd: assume update-motd responsibilities

2010-10-12 Thread Yusef Maali
Hello,

upgrading from lucid to maverik (server edition), for some reason, the package 
update-notifier-common was removed.
As main effect I have pam_motd to not refresh the /var/run/motd file.

Looking into the code (mainly the Steve's patch revision) I found the problem.
As Steve said:  I've also tweaked the first patch slightly, to avoid 
clobbering /var/run/motd if [...] the run-parts call fails;
This is useful, but in my case, I have had a dirty update-motd.d directory, 
with some scripts exiting with error (ie: run-parts: 
/etc/update-motd.d/20-cpu-checker exited with return code 2).
The system() call returns the error and the file /var/run/motd.new was never 
renamed into /var/run/motd.

Consider that even if some scripts of the update-mod.d chain fail, the
file /var/run/motd.new is created and written to disk with the only
output of the working scripts.

I have attached a patch that should solve this problem (at least I think it is 
a problem :) ).
The rename() call is not blocked by the system() call and moreover if run-parts 
exits with error (system()!=0) pam_syslog is used to log it and help sysadmins 
to find rapidly the problem.
If run-parts fails totally and /var/run/motd.new is not created, the rename() 
call returns the error (but we are not interested in it).

I hope to be useful.
Yusef

** Patch added: pam_motd.patch
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/399071/+attachment/1688175/+files/pam_motd.patch

-- 
pam_motd: assume update-motd responsibilities
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399071
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 518122] Re: Please rebuild for newer version of ImageMagick

2010-07-08 Thread Yusef Maali
I can't recompile the package so I used the one provided by Marco Cimmino (post 
#8).
It works correctly and it has solved my issue.

Just a question for Marco: in your package you have applied the patch in
post #6?

-- 
Please rebuild for newer version of ImageMagick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518122
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 495694] Re: kacpid uses 100% of CPU. Kernel is 2.6.31-17

2010-07-08 Thread Yusef Maali
Same issue.
Ubuntu Server, Lucid.

Hw: Intel Atom D945GCLF.
I haven't powernowd installed.

This problem is come after upgrading from 9.10 to 10.04.
Before that, I have never seen kacpid work in a such way.

** Tags added: lucid server

-- 
kacpid uses 100% of CPU. Kernel is 2.6.31-17
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495694
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 303068] Re: Static IP ethernet network setting is lost after reboot

2010-06-07 Thread Yusef Maali
I have done some test with Kubuntu 9.10 x86_64 / 10.04 x86 / 10.04 x86_64 
inside a VirtualBox 
environment.

The bug is 100% reproducible.

Reading your last message, I have noticed that in Kubuntu there isn't a way to 
edit the Auto Eth0 
connection (as you do).
It is shown by knetworkmanager and by plasma-widget-networkmanagement as 
available, but if you go 
to the Manage Connection panel only the custom connections are shown. The 
Auto Eth0 is hidden.
I have attached a screenshot.

After I create my static connection, the Auto eth0 remains alive and I can't 
de-select the 
connect automatically item.
I suppose it takes priority over the other connections.
If this is true (and I think so), the only way to use network-manager in 
Kubuntu is only through 
dhcp...

This is definitely a Kubuntu/Kde bug, not a network-manager bug.
I'm going to open a new bug.

** Attachment added: auto-eth0-missing.png
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49846802/auto-eth0-missing.png

-- 
Static IP ethernet network setting is lost after reboot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303068
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 591024] [NEW] Can't edit Auto eth0 connection makes impossible to use static Ip / custom connections in Kubuntu/Kde

2010-06-07 Thread Yusef Maali
Public bug reported:

I have noticed that in Kubuntu/Kde is not possible to edit the Auto
eth0 connection and, more important, is not possible to de-select its
Connect automatically item.

If I create a custom connection, ie for a static ip configuration, even if I 
select the Connect automatically item, after each reboot the Auto eth0 
profile takes priority over all other custom connections.
Seems that Kubuntu/Kde can only use Dhcp configuration at startup.

I have tested this issue with a 100% reproducibility in Kubuntu 9.10 and 10.04 
both in x86 and x86_64 version.
Ubuntu/Gnome doesn't have the problem and allow to edit correctly also the 
Auto eth0 connection. (see #303068).

Thanks for your great work!

** Affects: kdenetwork
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: knetworkmanager
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: plasma-widget-networkmanagement
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: plasma-widget-networkmanagement
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: knetworkmanager
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: kdenetwork
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Description changed:

  I have noticed that in Kubuntu/Kde is not possible to edit the Auto
- eth0 connection and, more important, is impossible to de-select its
+ eth0 connection and, more important, is not possible to de-select its
  Connect automatically item.
  
- In this way if I create a custom connection, ie for a static ip 
configuration, even if I select the Connect automatically item, after each 
reboot the Auto eth0 profile takes priority over all other custom connections.
- Seems to be that Kubuntu/Kde can only use Dhcp configuration at start-up.
+ If I create a custom connection, ie for a static ip configuration, even if I 
select the Connect automatically item, after each reboot the Auto eth0 
profile takes priority over all other custom connections.
+ Seems that Kubuntu/Kde can only use Dhcp configuration at startup.
  
  I have tested this issue with a 100% reproducibility in Kubuntu 9.10 and 
10.04 both in x86 and x86_64 version.
- Ubuntu/Gnome doesn't report the problem and shows correctly also the Auto 
eth0 connection. (see #303068).
+ Ubuntu/Gnome doesn't have the problem and allow to edit correctly also the 
Auto eth0 connection. (see #303068).
  
  Thanks for your great work!

-- 
Can't edit Auto eth0 connection makes impossible to use static Ip / custom 
connections in Kubuntu/Kde
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591024
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 591024] Re: Can't edit Auto eth0 connection makes impossible to use static Ip / custom connections in Kubuntu/Kde

2010-06-07 Thread Yusef Maali

** Attachment added: auto-eth0-missing.png
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49853610/auto-eth0-missing.png

-- 
Can't edit Auto eth0 connection makes impossible to use static Ip / custom 
connections in Kubuntu/Kde
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591024
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 303068] Re: Static IP ethernet network setting is lost after reboot

2010-06-07 Thread Yusef Maali
I have filed a new bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591024

-- 
Static IP ethernet network setting is lost after reboot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303068
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 5364] Re: Can't use static ip address with network-manager (and thus no VPN connections menu for static users)

2010-06-07 Thread Yusef Maali
Speaking about Kubuntu and not Ubuntu, I noticed the the Auto Eth0 and its 
Connect automatically flag is not editable. This makes impossible to create a 
custom connection (ie for static ip).
At each startup the Auto Eth0 takes priority over all other connections.

I have filed a bug report about this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591024

-- 
Can't use static ip address with network-manager (and thus no VPN connections 
menu for static users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/5364
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 280762] Re: knetworkmanager under kde4 doesn't recognize the static IP connections that I have configured.

2010-06-07 Thread Yusef Maali
Hi Jonathan,

I have not understand if knetworkmanger is no longer supported and if it
is removed from Kubuntu 9.10 and 10.04. Seems from your words that it is
replaced by the plasma-widget-networkmanagement as default option.

But if you install a fresh 9.10/10.04 Kubuntu (or update to them) you
will found knetworkmanager up and running, not the plasma widget :)

Anyway I noticed that the Auto Eth0 connection and its Connect 
automatically flag is not editable. This makes impossible to create a custom 
connection (ie for static ip).
At each startup the Auto Eth0 takes priority over all other connections.

I have filed a bug report about this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591024

-- 
knetworkmanager under kde4 doesn't recognize the static IP connections that I 
have configured. 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280762
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to knetworkmanager in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 315677] [NEW] Wrong dhcp rules for ufw

2009-01-09 Thread Yusef Maali
Public bug reported:

In /etc/ufw/before.rules there is the following rule:

# allow dhcp client to work
-A ufw-before-input -p udp --sport 67 --dport 68 -j ACCEPT

It is wrong.
Port 67 is bootps (server side) and port 68 is bootpc (client side).
The rule is inserted into ufw-before-input chain, that is part of the INPUT 
chain, so it is matched against incoming packets.
Dhcp incoming packets have as source port bootpc/68 (the client) and as 
destination port bootps/67 (the server).

The above rule should be correct, if it will be inserted into the OUTPUT
chain.

I provide a simple patch to correct the problem.

I'm using Intrepid/8.10 with both Kubuntu and Ubuntu Server and both have this 
issue.
ufw package installed is 0.23.2.


Best Regards,
Yusef Maali

** Affects: ufw (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Wrong dhcp rules for ufw
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315677
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 315677] Re: Wrong dhcp rules for ufw

2009-01-09 Thread Yusef Maali

** Attachment added: correct dhcp rule in /etc/ufw/before.rules
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21069227/before.rules.patch

-- 
Wrong dhcp rules for ufw
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315677
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 315677] Re: Wrong dhcp rules for ufw

2009-01-09 Thread Yusef Maali
Please forgive me and close this bug...
The rule is correct, I need to sleep... :(

The rule, as written in the comment, allow dhcp client to work.
My perplexity come from the installation of a dhcp server. It needs the rule in 
the patch to work correctly.

But if you have a dhcp server on a machine that is also a dhcp client
(perhaps it has no sense...), you need both rules...

Please close this bug as invalid.

Regards,
Yusef Maali

** Changed in: ufw (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Visibility changed to: Private

-- 
Wrong dhcp rules for ufw
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315677
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 279186] Re: x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)

2008-12-22 Thread Yusef Maali
For the intel board it was a purely Bios issue.
Please check if you have an upgrade for your netbook.
Otherwise I think you should write to the MSI support, highlighting this bug 
report. MSI may have to update their Bios's board. 

Yusef.

-- 
x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279186
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 279186] Re: x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)

2008-11-16 Thread Yusef Maali
Robert,

in my atom box the patched kernel still doesn't work...

I have to admit that I have used no conventional method:
I have compiled the kernel with a live 8.10 x86_64 kubuntu on a Core2Duo (and 
it compiles in less than 5 hours ;)
I have booted the atom box with a netboot debian live (because it hasn't a 
cdrom drive)
I have installed the new kernel chrooting inside the broken installation.

I get, again, a kernel panic.

Anyway, now I will try to compile directly on the atom box, hoping this gives a 
working kernel...
BTW, where I can find an alpha5/6 iso to download? I'm not able to find it on 
the net... :(

Regards,
Yusef

-- 
x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279186
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 279186] Re: x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)

2008-11-16 Thread Yusef Maali
I have done my test with an Ubuntu Hardy server (8.04.1) x86_64.

The new kernel doesn't work... :(
I get the same kernel panic...

It is behaving in a very strange way, because the third time I've tried to 
boot, it worked!!
After that, only kernel panics.

Very very strange...
I need to buy a serial cable to log the kernel startup.


- Andre: it took exactly 3 hours to compile all the stuff... May you haven't 
pass CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=2 to make-kpkg?

- Robert: if you would like to do more test, just tell me. And if you
would like to try the kernel package I have created I can upload them
somewhere.


Anyway, the only difference I have from a brand new D945GCLF is the bios 
version I have upgraded to the latest version 0103 
(LF94510J.86A.0103.2008.0814.1910).


Yusef

-- 
x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279186
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 279186] Re: x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)

2008-11-16 Thread Yusef Maali
Robert,
thanks for your help!

Yes, it is a random pattern... sometimes it boots, sometimes it don't...
Also in my case the kernel is around 250Mb, as you suggest I have attached my 
.config

I'm rebuilding with your config file. With a simple diff, I'm not able
to see if there are differences between the two configs.

Yep, 3 hours and 2 minutes.
Of course, a null modem ;)


Yusef


** Attachment added: config-2.6.27.4-custom
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19709779/config-2.6.27.4-custom

-- 
x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279186
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 279186] Re: x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)

2008-11-16 Thread Yusef Maali
and the git log (~100 lines...)

Thanks again.
Yusef

** Attachment added: git.log
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19709787/git.log

-- 
x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279186
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 279186] Re: x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)

2008-11-16 Thread Yusef Maali
But the config file you have attached, is the one installed with a clean 
Intrepid x86_64 server edition?
I was started from that one.

Thanks,
Yusef

-- 
x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279186
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 54020] Re: Kernel panic on install on amd64

2008-11-13 Thread Yusef Maali
Please have a look also at bug #279186.
It seems to be more specific to Intel D945GCLF(2).

-- 
Kernel panic on install on amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54020
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 54020] Re: Kernel panic on install on amd64

2008-11-11 Thread Yusef Maali
I have just tested also netboot kernel of hardy server and intrepid server (the 
one inside 20080522ubuntu21 directory).
They works correctly; the second needs a acpi=off as kernel parameter 
otherwise the boot finish with a kernel panic.
The other two netboot kernel of intrepid version (20080522ubuntu22 and 
20080522ubuntu23) doesn't work.

Cheers.
Yusef Maali

-- 
Kernel panic on install on amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54020
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 54020] Re: Kernel panic on install on amd64

2008-11-11 Thread Yusef Maali
I'm having a similar problem with the Intel D945GCLF (Atom 230, em64t
capable).

Trying to boot some amd64 ubuntu (intrepid) distributions (ubuntu 
dektop/server, server netboot and kubuntu), I get an early kernel panic (it is 
an hard lock).
I have tried a lot of possible kernel parameters: acpi=off, acpi=ht, 
acpi=noirq, noapic, nolapic, pci=nommconf, irqpoll
None of them brings me to complete the boot.

With the x86 kernel things work as expected.

Moreover I've tried the amd64 debian kernel (the one shipped with the netboot 
install for etch) and it works!
(http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/netboot.tar.gz)
debian kernel works, ubuntu kernel don't.

If you need more hardware informations I can take them from an x86
installation, because the x86_64 doesn't boot in any way.

Thanks.
Yusef Maali

-- 
Kernel panic on install on amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54020
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 279186] Re: x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)

2008-11-11 Thread Yusef Maali
I'm not a kernel expert but I'm having the same issue with the little
sister of your board, the D945GCLF with the Intel Atom 230 (single
core, HT capable).

I've tried to install the intrepid x86_64 server edition and:
- with the iso, I get an early kernel panic with an hard lock.
- with the netboot install I'm able to install the system only with the 
20080522ubuntu21 version (passing acpi=off). The other two version, including 
the current, give always a kernel panic.
As said, with that particular version of netboot installer I'm able to install 
the system, but after the first reboot I get only kernel panics.

With x86 kernel I have no problem to install ubuntu and also boot a live
cd.

If it can be useful, the debian etch netboot install for x86_64 works
perfectly (but it have a different kernel version).

Thanks.
Yusef Maali

-- 
x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279186
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145268] Re: libtunepimp-dev conflicts libraptor1-dev

2008-08-08 Thread Yusef Maali
I'm still having this problem.
I'm on a Kubuntu Hardy 8.04.1, x86 platform.

I'm attaching apt-cache results:

$: apt-cache show libtunepimp-dev
Package: libtunepimp-dev
Priority: optional
Section: libdevel
Installed-Size: 1084
Maintainer: Ubuntu Core Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original-Maintainer: Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Architecture: i386
Source: libtunepimp
Version: 0.5.3-6ubuntu4
Replaces: libtunepimp2-dev, libtunepimp3-dev
Depends: libcurl4-gnutls-dev, libexpat1-dev | libexpat-dev, libflac-dev, 
libmad0-dev, libmpcdec-dev, libmusicbrainz4-dev | libmusicbrainz-dev, 
libofa0-dev, libogg-dev, libtag1-dev, libtunepimp5 (= 0.5.3-6ubuntu4), 
libvorbis-dev, zlib1g-dev
Conflicts: libtunepimp2-dev, libtunepimp3-dev
Filename: pool/main/libt/libtunepimp/libtunepimp-dev_0.5.3-6ubuntu4_i386.deb
Size: 242178
MD5sum: 5d6ea10370564702cee5e59d77f69c83
SHA1: a55cc283c70cd75114d91c44294a89fb5857cb2a
SHA256: b41897870ad6f1441c2abac930500297db052fd0d02ab393565014f1ade05910
Description: MusicBrainz tagging library development files
 Libtunepimp simplifies tagging your audio files with the correct data
 about artist, album and track title using the MusicBrainz infrastrucure.
 It works on top of libmusicbrainz and libraries to read audio in FLAC, MP3
 Musepack (MPC), Speex, The True Audio (TTA), Ogg Vorbis, WAVE and WMA and
 WavPack (WV).
 .
 This package contains headers, documentation and static libraries.
 .
  Homepage: http://musicbrainz.org/doc/libtunepimp
Bugs: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Origin: Ubuntu



$: apt-cache show libraptor1-dev
Package: libraptor1-dev
Priority: optional
Section: libdevel
Installed-Size: 644
Maintainer: Ubuntu Core Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original-Maintainer: Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Architecture: i386
Source: raptor
Version: 1.4.16-1
Provides: libraptor-dev
Depends: libraptor1 (= 1.4.16-1), libxml2-dev (= 2.5.10), 
libcurl4-openssl-dev, libxslt1-dev (= 1.0.18), pkg-config (= 0.18)
Recommends: raptor-utils
Suggests: libraptor1-doc
Conflicts: libraptor-dev, libraptor0 (= 0.9.12-2), libraptor1 (= 1.0.0-4)
Filename: pool/main/r/raptor/libraptor1-dev_1.4.16-1_i386.deb
Size: 215370
MD5sum: 275a524c137dd3e77f436e80dff89055
SHA1: da3c58bd5a5f1c28cbe74f00cc7d22f52540b1b9
SHA256: 105b3f2344363d63785025d601ac81e20646366a9f78c8b3c34eda08a9826bd4
Description: Raptor RDF parser and serializer development libraries and headers
 Raptor Resource Description Framework (RDF) parser and serializer
 development libraries, header files and documentation needed by
 programs that want to be compiled with Raptor.
Bugs: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Origin: Ubuntu



As you can see this conflicts doesn't seem to be resolved.
Thanks.

-- 
libtunepimp-dev conflicts libraptor1-dev
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145268
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 225411] Re: [hardy] vim-latexsuite doesn't work

2008-05-08 Thread Yusef Maali
Save the patch somewhere, i.e. /tmp/vim-latexsuite.patch
Then:

$: cd /usr/share/vim/registry/
$: sudo patch -p0  /tmp/vim-latexsuite.patch

Done.
vim-latexsuite package has to be already installed.

I hope to be helpful :)

-- 
[hardy] vim-latexsuite doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225411
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 225411] [NEW] [hardy] vim-latexsuite doesn't work

2008-05-01 Thread Yusef Maali
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: vim-latexsuite

After upgrading to Hardy from Gutsy, I've installed vim-latexsuite

$: sudo apt-get install vim-latexsuite
$: vim-addons install latex-suite
$: vim-addons status
# Name User Status  System Status
[SNIP]
latex-suite broken removed
[SNIP]

and obviously the latex-suite isn't working.

After a little investigation, I have found the problem to be into:
/usr/share/vim/registry/vim-latexsuite.yaml

I've attached a patch that make latex-suite working.

I'm using:
vim-full: 1:7.1-138+1ubuntu3
vim-latexsuite: 20060325-4.1

** Affects: vim-latexsuite (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[hardy] vim-latexsuite doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225411
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 225411] Re: [hardy] vim-latexsuite doesn't work

2008-05-01 Thread Yusef Maali

** Attachment added: vim-latexsuite.patch
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14071667/vim-latexsuite.patch

-- 
[hardy] vim-latexsuite doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225411
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs