[Bug 781743] Re: Ubuntu Natty can't suspend on an Asus X52F-XR5R (i3); blank screen
This was still an issue in Precise Pangolin, and the same script fixed it. I'd bet that's the case for the hundreds of other people in the comments section of that site. I will provide the info if I manage to squeeze the time required to do it (sorry, I'm pretty busy at the moment). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781743 Title: Ubuntu Natty can't suspend on an Asus X52F-XR5R (i3); blank screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/781743/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 701141] Re: rss ulimit does not apply
As far as I can tell, this is not something that would require any additional information. This does not work for anyone - it's as simple as that - meaning that any information collected is just as good no matter from which computer it was collected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/701141 Title: rss ulimit does not apply To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/701141/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 753971] Re: Display garbled when connecting external displays
I still have major issues with this myself. They closed the ticket, but where are all those tickets tracking the remaining issues? Or do they hope we'll open new tickets again in a constant battle with them? I don't want to appear negative or anything, but I'm just disappointed. What should I state in those new tickets when the problem is as simple as plug in monitor - crash burn? I suspect they lack resources and would want to get rid of the bugs asap just so they can add NEW functionality. Perhaps someone should forward this to the people in charge and tell them they're not improving usability at all by creating ambitious projects like Unity while the rest of the code base is deteriorating. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753971 Title: Display garbled when connecting external displays To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/753971/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 753971] Re: Display garbled when connecting external displays
I'll second Ben Romer's observation. It seems to have gotten better, but it's a long way from smooth functioning. I hope I won't come across as unhelpful (by not providing specific details), but a testing routine should be pretty simple: * Plug unplug the external monitor make sure everything still works * Suspend then wake up with the external monitor plugged in make sure everything still works * Restart the Ubuntu system with the external monitor plugged in make sure everything still works * Suspend then wake up with the laptop lid closed the external monitor plugged in make sure everything still works * Restart the Ubuntu system with the external monitor plugged in the lid laptop closed make sure everything still works * In the above points, try opening the lid when the system is running (if it was closed) Currently, all of the above points will cause major problems, sometimes to the point of requiring a reboot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753971 Title: Display garbled when connecting external displays To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/753971/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 779681] Re: Unity fails and crashes X when second display connected
Is there at least a duplicate of this bug that's being worked on? The bug is very real, as can be seen from many reports across the internet. The bug is also very serious. Also, I'm pretty certain that almost anyone can reproduce this bug by just plugging in an external monitor. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779681 Title: Unity fails and crashes X when second display connected -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 786839] Re: AppArmor does not and cannot start
Thanks for your help. Actually I did not currently have SELinux installed. I did install it some time ago, but then I swiftly uninstalled it. However, it seems that that line in grub.cfg was a leftover from the SELinux install (perhaps I should open a bug against SELinux?) and was enough to prevent AppArmor from running correctly. So, AppArmor now work. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786839 Title: AppArmor does not and cannot start -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 786839] Re: AppArmor does not and cannot start
* now work - now works -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786839 Title: AppArmor does not and cannot start -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 786839] Re: AppArmor does not and cannot start
I do have Virtual Box installed on my system, but the problem occurs on the host (main Ubuntu system) and not in any of my guests. I know that Virtual Box does install some kernel components into the host's kernel: do you think this might cause problems with AppArmor? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786839 Title: AppArmor does not and cannot start -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 786839] [NEW] AppArmor does not and cannot start
Public bug reported: Setting up apparmor (2.6.1-0ubuntu3) ... * Starting AppArmor profiles * AppArmor not available as kernel LSM. ...fail! AND: root ~ # modprobe apparmor FATAL: Module apparmor not found. AND: root ~ # /etc/init.d/apparmor status * AppArmor not available as kernel LSM. ...fail! root ~ # /etc/init.d/apparmor start * Starting AppArmor profiles * AppArmor not available as kernel LSM. ...fail! The internet is full of similar reports. Is AppArmor even supposed to work in Ubuntu? Or is it something like: it's great if it works with this particular kernel, but we're not debugging the issue if it doesn't work cause we have more important things to do? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: linux-image-2.6.38-8-generic 2.6.38-8.42 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.23. Architecture: amd64 ArecordDevices: List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: CONEXANT Analog [CONEXANT Analog] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: andrei 2145 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC1: andrei 2145 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xd540 irq 42' Mixer name : 'Intel IbexPeak HDMI' Components : 'HDA:14f15069,104313f3,00100302 HDA:80862804,80860101,0010' Controls : 12 Simple ctrls : 6 Card1.Amixer.info: Card hw:1 'N700'/'Logitech Logitech Speaker Lapdesk N700 at usb-:00:1d.0-1.2, full speed' Mixer name : 'USB Mixer' Components : 'USB046d:0a1a' Controls : 2 Simple ctrls : 1 Date: Mon May 23 08:58:04 2011 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=d1b238f3-ed49-4724-8133-7ef98f115e5c InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110426) MachineType: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. K52F ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-2.6.38-8-generic root=/dev/mapper/hostname-root ro quiet splash security=selinux selinux=1 vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.38-8-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-2.6.38-8-generic N/A linux-firmware1.52 RfKill: 0: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 11/01/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: K52F.212 dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.board.name: K52F dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. dmi.board.version: 1.0 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. dmi.chassis.version: 1.0 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrK52F.212:bd11/01/2010:svnASUSTeKComputerInc.:pnK52F:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:rnK52F:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:ct10:cvr1.0: dmi.product.name: K52F dmi.product.version: 1.0 dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786839 Title: AppArmor does not and cannot start -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 786839] Re: AppArmor does not and cannot start
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786839 Title: AppArmor does not and cannot start -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 330286] Re: package selinux 1:0.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 127
Thanks, it helped me. Anyone should stay away from SELinux on Ubuntu as it's not well supported and you'll be in for a major headache. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330286 Title: package selinux 1:0.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre- removal script returned error exit status 127 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 700757] Re: unity aborts when you plug in an external monitor
I have this issue for a config with laptop + external monitor (1366x768 + 1280x1024). Asus i3 2.53 GHz using the integrated GMA HD video card. My GL_MAX_TEXTURE_SIZE is 4096: glxinfo -l | grep GL_MAX_TEXTURE_SIZE GL_MAX_TEXTURE_SIZE = 4096 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700757 Title: unity aborts when you plug in an external monitor -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 699802] Re: error:: no video mode activated
Have this same problem on an Asus laptop i3 2.53 GHz with lvm + crypt. Interestingly, initially I *upgraded* from Maverick to Natty and the problem didn't occur. After a clean install of Natty it started occurring. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/699802 Title: error:: no video mode activated -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 781743] [NEW] Ubuntu Natty can't suspend on an Asus X52F-XR5R (i3); blank screen
Public bug reported: Ubuntu Natty can't suspend on an Asus X52F-XR5R (i3); after suspend is initiated, the laptop is stuck at a screen with a single cursor (non- blinking) in the top left corner ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: linux-generic 2.6.38.8.22 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.23. Architecture: amd64 ArecordDevices: List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: CONEXANT Analog [CONEXANT Analog] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: andrei 1660 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC1: andrei 1660 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xd540 irq 42' Mixer name : 'Intel IbexPeak HDMI' Components : 'HDA:14f15069,104313f3,00100302 HDA:80862804,80860101,0010' Controls : 12 Simple ctrls : 6 Card1.Amixer.info: Card hw:1 'N700'/'Logitech Logitech Speaker Lapdesk N700 at usb-:00:1d.0-1.2, full speed' Mixer name : 'USB Mixer' Components : 'USB046d:0a1a' Controls : 2 Simple ctrls : 1 Date: Thu May 12 18:13:50 2011 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=d1b238f3-ed49-4724-8133-7ef98f115e5c InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110426) MachineType: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. K52F ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-2.6.38-8-generic root=/dev/mapper/hostname-root ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.38-8-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-2.6.38-8-generic N/A linux-firmware1.52 RfKill: 0: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 11/01/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: K52F.212 dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.board.name: K52F dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. dmi.board.version: 1.0 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. dmi.chassis.version: 1.0 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrK52F.212:bd11/01/2010:svnASUSTeKComputerInc.:pnK52F:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:rnK52F:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:ct10:cvr1.0: dmi.product.name: K52F dmi.product.version: 1.0 dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781743 Title: Ubuntu Natty can't suspend on an Asus X52F-XR5R (i3); blank screen -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 781743] Re: Ubuntu Natty can't suspend on an Asus X52F-XR5R (i3); blank screen
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781743 Title: Ubuntu Natty can't suspend on an Asus X52F-XR5R (i3); blank screen -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 781743] Re: Ubuntu Natty can't suspend on an Asus X52F-XR5R (i3); blank screen
The script here, fixes the issue: http://thecodecentral.com/2011/01/18/fix-ubuntu-10-10-suspendhibernate- not-working-bug I'm not sure why something like this isn't studied to have the relevant components (without impeding users who don't need it) included by default in Ubuntu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781743 Title: Ubuntu Natty can't suspend on an Asus X52F-XR5R (i3); blank screen -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 778828] [NEW] Unity Bar problems with the application icons for applications run as root
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: unity Some graphical applications like JungleDisk (proprietary) and IPBlock are run as root on my system (it's either recommended - for JungleDisk, or mandatory - for IPBlock). Problems: * These apps cannot be pinned to the Unity bar. * Sometimes, they are wrongly matched to the icons of other running applications (meaning that JungleDisk for example will be restored when pressing the icon for Krusader on the Unity Bar) ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: icons natty unity unity-bar ** Tags added: icons natty unity unity-bar ** Description changed: Binary package hint: unity - Some graphical applications like JungleDisk (proprietary), IPBlock are - ran as root (it's either recommended like JungleDisk, or mandatory like - IPBlock). + Some graphical applications like JungleDisk (proprietary) and IPBlock + are ran as root on my system (it's either recommended - for JungleDisk, + or mandatory - for IPBlock). Problems: * These apps cannot be pinned to the Unity bar. * Sometimes, they are wrongly matched to the icons of other running applications ** Description changed: Binary package hint: unity Some graphical applications like JungleDisk (proprietary) and IPBlock are ran as root on my system (it's either recommended - for JungleDisk, or mandatory - for IPBlock). Problems: * These apps cannot be pinned to the Unity bar. * Sometimes, they are wrongly matched to the icons of other running - applications + applications (meaning that JungleDisk for example will be restored when + pressing the icon for Krusader on the Unity Bar) ** Summary changed: - Problems with matching applications to Unity icons (likely with graphical apps ran as root) + Unity Bar problems with the application icons for applications ran as root ** Summary changed: - Unity Bar problems with the application icons for applications ran as root + Unity Bar problems with the application icons for applications run as root ** Description changed: Binary package hint: unity Some graphical applications like JungleDisk (proprietary) and IPBlock - are ran as root on my system (it's either recommended - for JungleDisk, + are run as root on my system (it's either recommended - for JungleDisk, or mandatory - for IPBlock). Problems: * These apps cannot be pinned to the Unity bar. * Sometimes, they are wrongly matched to the icons of other running applications (meaning that JungleDisk for example will be restored when pressing the icon for Krusader on the Unity Bar) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778828 Title: Unity Bar problems with the application icons for applications run as root -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 778828] Re: Unity Bar problems with the application icons for applications run as root
** Description changed: Binary package hint: unity Some graphical applications like JungleDisk (proprietary) and IPBlock are run as root on my system (it's either recommended - for JungleDisk, or mandatory - for IPBlock). Problems: - * These apps cannot be pinned to the Unity bar. + * These apps cannot be pinned to the Unity bar. To be more exact, they + appear to be pinned but it lasts only for the duration of the currently + running instance (or try restarting the system if it still appears to be + pinned after restarting the app) * Sometimes, they are wrongly matched to the icons of other running applications (meaning that JungleDisk for example will be restored when pressing the icon for Krusader on the Unity Bar) ** Description changed: Binary package hint: unity Some graphical applications like JungleDisk (proprietary) and IPBlock are run as root on my system (it's either recommended - for JungleDisk, or mandatory - for IPBlock). Problems: * These apps cannot be pinned to the Unity bar. To be more exact, they appear to be pinned but it lasts only for the duration of the currently - running instance (or try restarting the system if it still appears to be - pinned after restarting the app) + running application instance (or try restarting the system if it still + appears to be pinned after restarting the app) * Sometimes, they are wrongly matched to the icons of other running applications (meaning that JungleDisk for example will be restored when pressing the icon for Krusader on the Unity Bar) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778828 Title: Unity Bar problems with the application icons for applications run as root -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773307] Re: Many apps are missing their tray icons in Natty/Unity
Well, since it's based on a whitelist, *all* apps will lack a tray icon (except the few in the whitelist, and except for the even fewer ones implementing the new indicator thing which will appear in the indicator area to the right). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773307 Title: Many apps are missing their tray icons in Natty/Unity -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773762] Re: Non-pinned icons for running applications will not maintain their position in the Unity Bar
Another update: Sometimes it occurs even without having to be logged in (from a terminal) as root. Or, if you think this is a non-standard thing to do, try logging in as another standard user on the machine (su -l another_user). ** Description changed: Binary package hint: unity If I move a non-pinned icon for a running application to the middle of the Unity Bar (middle = having applications above and below it) and then I minimize and restore this application, the icon will be moved to the bottom of the Unity Bar. This makes it confusing as users usually arrange their icons and expect them to keep their positions unchanged. UPDATE (steps to reproduce): Using this, it will always happen for me: * Close all programs that have icons in the Unity Bar * Unpin all programs so that the Bar will be empty (except for those built-in items that you can't remove) * Start Transmission * Start Banshee * Minimize Banshee * Minimize Transmission * Now move the Banshee icon so that it will be above Transmission's icon in the Unity Bar * Now click on the desktop (anywhere in an empty spot) * Click on the Banshee icon Expected result: Banshee should keep its top position in the Unity Bar What actually happens: Banshee will be moved below Transmission UPDATE 2: It might only happen when the root user is logged in (not graphically, just in a terminal running under the normal user). When trying the above steps, I was logged in as root (su -l root) in a non-attached tmux session (root account enabled with sudo passwd -l root). Being logged in as root has been for a long time causing problems like not being able to restart (results in being logged out instead of restarting the computer if the root user was logged in in some terminal, at the moment of restart). This one... is way stranger though. (Why was I logged in as root - in a terminal? Because sometimes, when performing many administrative tasks it's easier than typing sudo in front of all commands). + + UPDATE 3: + + Sometimes it occurs even without having to be logged in (from a + terminal) as root. Or, if you think this is a non-standard thing to do, + try logging in as another standard user on the machine (su -l + another_user). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773762 Title: Non-pinned icons for running applications will not maintain their position in the Unity Bar -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773307] Re: Many apps are missing their tray icons in Natty/Unity
Yes, the fix is only for Ubuntu when using Unity - so it won't work in Classic mode where Unity is not employed. I cannot say anything about your problem as I haven't spent much time in Classic mode. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773307 Title: Many apps are missing their tray icons in Natty/Unity -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773762] Re: Non-pinned icons for running applications will not maintain their position in the Unity Bar
Further clarifications: When trying to reproduce this, please make sure that: * Make sure that you have non-pinned icons both above and below this icon we're testing with * It might not happen with all applications. Apps I can confirm that it occurs with: Banshee, Transmission, Krusader It seems to go like this: 1.) a new icon is created at the bottom when restoring the app (as if it can't see it's already there) 2.) It then realizes there are 2 (duplicate) icons of this app, and it will remove the first one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773762 Title: Non-pinned icons for running applications will not maintain their position in the Unity Bar -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773762] Re: Non-pinned icons for running applications will not maintain their position in the Unity Bar
More details: Discussion here: http://askubuntu.com/questions/38222/unity-bar-auto- hide-behaviour-and-application-icons-placement suggests it only happens for apps NOT launched through the Unity launcher (e.g. from the command line - I tend to run some apps like this for example from startup scripts, or if I create a script to launch multiple frequently-used apps at the same time). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773762 Title: Non-pinned icons for running applications will not maintain their position in the Unity Bar -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773762] Re: Non-pinned icons for running applications will not maintain their position in the Unity Bar
It's strange that even in the mentioned conditions, and with those apps, it will not happen all the time. I'll keep an eye on this and report here if I can gather what is more exactly that's causing these issues. It DOES happen quite often though - enough to be annoying - hence the reason for opening this ticket. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773762 Title: Non-pinned icons for running applications will not maintain their position in the Unity Bar -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773762] Re: Non-pinned icons for running applications will not maintain their position in the Unity Bar
Using this, it will always happen for me: * Close all programs that have icons in the Unity Bar * Unpin all programs so that the Bar will be empty (except for those built-in items that you can't remove) * Start Transmission * Start Banshee * Minimize Banshee * Minimize Transmission * Now move the Banshee icon so that it will be above Transmission's icon in the Unity Bar * Click on the Banshee icon Expected result: Banshee should keep its top position in the Unity Bar What actually happens: Banshee will be moved below Transmission ** Description changed: Binary package hint: unity If I move a non-pinned icon for a running application to the middle of the Unity Bar (middle = having applications above and below it) and then I minimize and restore this application, the icon will be moved to the bottom of the Unity Bar. This makes it confusing as users usually arrange their icons and expect them to keep their positions unchanged. + + UPDATE (steps to reproduce): + + Using this, it will always happen for me: + + * Close all programs that have icons in the Unity Bar + + * Unpin all programs so that the Bar will be empty (except for those + built-in items that you can't remove) + + * Start Transmission + + * Start Banshee + + * Minimize Banshee + + * Minimize Transmission + + * Now move the Banshee icon so that it will be above Transmission's icon + in the Unity Bar + + * Click on the Banshee icon + + Expected result: Banshee should keep its top position in the Unity Bar + + What actually happens: Banshee will be moved below Transmission -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773762 Title: Non-pinned icons for running applications will not maintain their position in the Unity Bar -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773762] Re: Non-pinned icons for running applications will not maintain their position in the Unity Bar
IMPORTANT: When trying to reproduce the above steps, please make sure that you click on your desktop before trying to activate Banshee, otherwise the problem will not occur when following these steps. ** Description changed: Binary package hint: unity If I move a non-pinned icon for a running application to the middle of the Unity Bar (middle = having applications above and below it) and then I minimize and restore this application, the icon will be moved to the bottom of the Unity Bar. This makes it confusing as users usually arrange their icons and expect them to keep their positions unchanged. UPDATE (steps to reproduce): Using this, it will always happen for me: * Close all programs that have icons in the Unity Bar * Unpin all programs so that the Bar will be empty (except for those built-in items that you can't remove) * Start Transmission * Start Banshee * Minimize Banshee * Minimize Transmission * Now move the Banshee icon so that it will be above Transmission's icon in the Unity Bar + * Now click on the desktop (anywhere in an empty spot) + * Click on the Banshee icon Expected result: Banshee should keep its top position in the Unity Bar What actually happens: Banshee will be moved below Transmission -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773762 Title: Non-pinned icons for running applications will not maintain their position in the Unity Bar -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773762] Re: Non-pinned icons for running applications will not maintain their position in the Unity Bar
Update: It might only happen when the root user is logged in. When trying the above steps, I was logged in as root (su -l root) in a non-attached tmux session (root account enabled with sudo passwd -l root). Being logged in as root has been for a long time causing problems like not being able to restart (results in being logged out instead of restarting the computer if the root user was logged in at the moment of restart). This one... is way stranger though. ** Description changed: Binary package hint: unity If I move a non-pinned icon for a running application to the middle of the Unity Bar (middle = having applications above and below it) and then I minimize and restore this application, the icon will be moved to the bottom of the Unity Bar. This makes it confusing as users usually arrange their icons and expect them to keep their positions unchanged. UPDATE (steps to reproduce): Using this, it will always happen for me: * Close all programs that have icons in the Unity Bar * Unpin all programs so that the Bar will be empty (except for those built-in items that you can't remove) * Start Transmission * Start Banshee * Minimize Banshee * Minimize Transmission * Now move the Banshee icon so that it will be above Transmission's icon in the Unity Bar * Now click on the desktop (anywhere in an empty spot) * Click on the Banshee icon Expected result: Banshee should keep its top position in the Unity Bar What actually happens: Banshee will be moved below Transmission + + UPDATE 2: + + It might only happen when the root user is logged in (not graphically, + just in a terminal running under the normal user). When trying the above + steps, I was logged in as root (su -l root) in a non-attached tmux + session (root account enabled with sudo passwd -l root). Being logged in + as root has been for a long time causing problems like not being able to + restart (results in being logged out instead of restarting the computer + if the root user was logged in in some terminal, at the moment of + restart). This one... is way stranger though. (Why was I logged in as + root - in a terminal? Because sometimes, when performing many + administrative tasks it's easier than typing sudo in front of all + commands). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773762 Title: Non-pinned icons for running applications will not maintain their position in the Unity Bar -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773307] [NEW] All QT apps are missing their tray icons in Natty/Unity
Public bug reported: All QT apps (at least those I've tried - many!) are missing their tray icons. This makes many apps unusable if they start minimized to tray by default. Is there at least a temporary workaround for this? Like sending a signal/message to a process/window to force it to foreground? ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773307 Title: All QT apps are missing their tray icons in Natty/Unity -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773307] Re: Many apps are missing their tray icons in Natty/Unity
** Summary changed: - All QT apps are missing their tray icons in Natty/Unity + Many apps are missing their tray icons in Natty/Unity ** Description changed: - All QT apps (at least those I've tried - many!) are missing their tray - icons. This makes many apps unusable if they start minimized to tray by - default. Is there at least a temporary workaround for this? Like sending - a signal/message to a process/window to force it to foreground? + The tray icons for many apps (especially QT apps) are missing! + + Important apps that become unusable after being minimized to tray - due + to having no tray icon: + + * Pidgin + * KeePass + * JungleDisk + + UPDATE: + + I was able to fix it by setting the systray-whitelist to ['all'] as + described here: + + http://www.webupd8.org/2011/04/how-to-re-enable-notification-area.html + + I'm not setting this as invalid, as I'd like to have an answer from a + developer. Is this acceptable? How can this be considered acceptable if + it renders many popular applications unusable? It seems the user has to + go through an arcane interface just to make some very popular + applications like Pidgin usable? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773307 Title: Many apps are missing their tray icons in Natty/Unity -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773762] [NEW] Non-pinned icons for running applications will not maintain their position in the Unity Bar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: unity If I move a non-pinned icon for a running application to the middle of the Unity Bar (middle = having applications above and below it) and then I minimize and restore this application, the icon will be moved to the bottom of the Unity Bar. This makes it confusing as users usually arrange their icons and expect them to keep their positions unchanged. ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: natty unity ** Tags added: natty unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773762 Title: Non-pinned icons for running applications will not maintain their position in the Unity Bar -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773760] [NEW] Unity Bar will not stay on top when left-edge activated in about 10% of the cases
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: unity When activating the Unity Bar from the top-left-corner, the Bar will always stay on top as long as I'm hovering above it. When I'm doing the left-edge activation, in ~90% of the cases it will stay on top (as long as I'm hovering above it), in the rest of the cases it will hide itself rather quickly even though I'm still hovering above it. ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: natty unity ** Tags added: natty ** Description changed: Binary package hint: unity When activating the Unity Bar from the top-left-corner, the Bar will - always stay on top. When I'm doing the left-edge activation, in ~90% of - the cases it will stay on top, in the rest of the cases it will hide - itself rather quickly even though I'm still hovering above it. + always stay on top as long as I'm hovering above it. When I'm doing the + left-edge activation, in ~90% of the cases it will stay on top, in the + rest of the cases it will hide itself rather quickly even though I'm + still hovering above it. ** Description changed: Binary package hint: unity When activating the Unity Bar from the top-left-corner, the Bar will always stay on top as long as I'm hovering above it. When I'm doing the - left-edge activation, in ~90% of the cases it will stay on top, in the - rest of the cases it will hide itself rather quickly even though I'm - still hovering above it. + left-edge activation, in ~90% of the cases it will stay on top (as long + as I'm hovering above it), in the rest of the cases it will hide itself + rather quickly even though I'm still hovering above it. ** Tags added: unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773760 Title: Unity Bar will not stay on top when left-edge activated in about 10% of the cases -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197288] Re: New windows are put in the background when a window has Always on Top set
Also experiencing this in Maverick on a brand new laptop. It boggles the mind how something so serious could be ignored for ~2 years :(( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197288 Title: New windows are put in the background when a window has Always on Top set -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197288] Re: New windows are put in the background when a window has Always on Top set
Also, the strict mode workaround is not working for me. Anything else you reckon I should try? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197288 Title: New windows are put in the background when a window has Always on Top set -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 701141] Re: rss ulimit does not apply
Any updates? I can confirm this as well. Interestingly, other limits work; for example ulimit -v is enforced though it's not that useful. Will this get fixed? IMO, the rss limit is tremendously useful for killing processes that balloon out of control. VLC as of late will balloon out of control when playing many fake movies that can be found online. This is so important that I ended up writing my own Python script (running with SCHED_RR, priority 99) that will retrieve ballooning processes using ps and then proceed to kill them if their rss exceeds a certain amount. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/701141 Title: rss ulimit does not apply -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 621265] Re: Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
I can confirm that installing the kernel here (now obsolete): http://people.canonical.com/~apw/lp621265-maverick/ - fixed the problem on a Fujitsu-Siemens V5545 having an Intel Wireless 3945ABG chipset. No other solutions posted above worked for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265 Title: Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278648] Re: [regression]snd-hda-intel sound input does not work at all with Conexant CX20549 (Venice) chips
@c4pp4: I have a Fujitsu-Siemens V5545 using a Conexant CX20549 (Venice) chipset. I applied your patch but the microphone is still not functional. When using the lenovo model the input devices disappear from my list of devices as shown by alsamixer -D hw:0. When using the laptop-hpsense, laptop-micsense, laptop-hpmicsense, benq, laptop-hp530 models, and AFTER I unmute and raise the volume level for my input devices inside alsamixer -D hw:0, I can hear some crackling noise coming from my laptop's speakers when I plug / unplug my external microphone. Even so, the microphone does not appear to actually work - trying to record something in Audacity results in silence (actually in a slight digital equipment-like noise). When using the test model and after raising the volume level for all devices I can find in alsamixer -D hw:0 I can't even hear that crackling noise... What do you suggest I should try next? I'm not work-shy and don't expect solutions to be delivered on a plate, so please do tell whatever you have in mind. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278648 Title: [regression]snd-hda-intel sound input does not work at all with Conexant CX20549 (Venice) chips -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
