Public bug reported:
1] >lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 17.04
Release:17.04
2] >apt-cache policy systemd
systemd:
Installed: 232-21ubuntu5
Candidate: 232-21ubuntu5
Version table:
*** 232-21ubuntu5 500
500 http://dca-ubuntu-repo.ipipenet.com/ubuntu
i've figured out at least part of this issue.
the system now no longer hangs at shutdown, but there are still
filesystems it complains it is unable to unmount, and the system still
hangs if it unable to unmount /home, which happens to be an nfs share
[i'm uncertain if this is of particular
Public bug reported:
i'd done a new install of 17.04, and this had been working ok. this
morning, i did an update, and now the system complains about being
unable to unmount certain filesystems, as well as hanging during the
shutdown process upon displaying "[ ok ] reached target shutdown"
Aug
Public bug reported:
with xenial-updates, there is suddenly a dependency [isc-dhcp-client]
not previously there. please mark this as recommends/suggests/enhances
instead of as a depends, as it is not critical to the core functionality
of the software. since ubuntu now defaults to installing
it appears that my symptoms also relate to this bug report. however,
i'd like to add that the feedback provided by the system, at least in my
particular case, is extremely unhelpful. i think it can be better.
i have a very minimal virtual guest, running 16.04. it has a "physical"
wired
Public bug reported:
please include support for pki:
09-Aug 08:04 server-fd JobId 0: Fatal error: PKI encryption/signing enabled but
not compiled into Bareos.
09-Aug 08:04 server-fd: ERROR in filed.c:227 Please correct configuration file:
bareos-fd.conf
1] >lsb_release -rd
Description:
Public bug reported:
i've just upgraded to 15.10, and have now found that the
/etc/defaults/bind9 file appears to be ignored. yet another package
broken by the adoption of systemd, it would seem.
>cat /etc/default/bind9
# run resolvconf?
RESOLVCONF=yes
# startup options for the server
in my case, it's 14.04.4 it's happening with
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1519974
Title:
/etc/fstab nfs mounts are not mounted at startup
To manage notifications about this bug go
it used to list certificates [files] being processed. it now does not:
>update-ca-certificates --verbose --fresh
Clearing symlinks in /etc/ssl/certs...
done.
Updating certificates in /etc/ssl/certs...
Doing .
175 added, 0 removed; done.
Running hooks in /etc/ca-certificates/update.d...
done.
>
Public bug reported:
unfortunately, yet another example of a package that is now broken
thanks to ubuntu switching to systemd. the /etc/defaults/ settings are
no longer honored:
>cat /etc/default/haveged
# Configuration file for haveged
# Options to pass to haveged:
# -w sets low entropy
Public bug reported:
following an update from 15.04 to 15.10, the --verbose option no longer
prints verbose output
1] >lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 15.10
Release:15.10
2] >apt-cache policy ca-certificates
ca-certificates:
Installed: 20150426ubuntu1
Candidate:
upstream has indicated this is a bug:
http://lists.opendkim.org/archive/opendkim/users/2015/10/3579.html
i've submitted an upstream ticket:
https://sourceforge.net/p/opendkim/bugs/237/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Description changed:
as per opendkim.conf(5), i've enabled softstart:
egrep -v '(^[[:space:]]*#|^[[:space:]]*$)' opendkim.conf
PidFile /run/opendkim/opendkim.pid
Syslogyes
SyslogSuccess
Public bug reported:
when ovs is started [e.g. systemctl start openvswitch-switch.service],
the services [ovsdb-server and ovs-vswitchd] are started, but no
interfaces are brought up. running ifup --allow=ovs br0 manually after
ovs starts does bring up the interfaces.
>cat
Public bug reported:
when ovs is started [e.g. systemctl start openvswitch-switch.service],
the services [ovsdb-server and ovs-vswitchd] are started, but no
interfaces are brought up. running ifup --allow=ovs br0 manually after
ovs starts does bring up the interfaces.
>cat
thanks for the time you've devoted to this. your assessment seems to be
exactly the case, given a little more testing here. i've converted to a
disk type of file, and snapshots work [mostly - see my next comment].
i'd never used/tried snapshots with this particular configuration. i'm
sure
i can now create snapshots if using --disk-only, but i guess this is an
"external" snapshot? which leads to other problems, like not being able
to delete it:
>virsh snapshot-create-as orb-template-ubuntu 'test_snapshot_3' 'test snapshot
>3'
error: operation failed: Error -22 while writing VM
Public bug reported:
the README file indicates that "invoke-rc.d iptables-persistent save" is
one option for saving the current ruleset, but this doesn't work:
>invoke-rc.d iptables-persistent save
/usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d: 633: /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d:
/etc/init.d/iptables-persistent: not found
Public bug reported:
immediately following a new install with a minimal configuration, i've
found that two messages are logged regarding dhcpd:
Aug 27 12:46:34 server dhcpd: Can't create PID file /run/dhcp-
server/dhcpd.pid: Permission denied.
Aug 27 12:46:37 honeycomb kernel: audit: type=1400
i've addressed this, from my perspective, by switching to an independent
systemd unit file:
cat /etc/systemd/system/opendkim.service
[Unit]
Description=DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Milter
Documentation=man:opendkim(8) man:opendkim.conf(5) man:opendkim-genkey(8)
man:opendkim-genzone(8)
Public bug reported:
as per opendkim.conf(5), i've enabled softstart:
egrep -v '(^[[:space:]]*#|^[[:space:]]*$)' opendkim.conf
PidFile /run/opendkim/opendkim.pid
Syslog yes
SyslogSuccess yes
LogWhy
i neglect to provide accommodations for creation of /run/opendkim - here
is an amended systemd unit file:
[Unit]
Description=DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Milter
Documentation=man:opendkim(8) man:opendkim.conf(5) man:opendkim-genkey(8)
man:opendkim-genzone(8) man:opendkim-testadsp(8)
thanks for this. i'd tried LDAPSoftStart, which didn't work, missing
that it had been renamed. i've added SoftStart yes to the config, but
the behavior seems to be the same.
i can corroborate that this seems new with 15.04/systemd. another older
system like yours works ok.
--
You received
some additional detail regarding SoftStart - it seems to not be working
right [systemd issues excluded]:
egrep -v '(^[[:space:]]*#|^[[:space:]]*$)' opendkim.conf
Syslog yes
SyslogSuccess yes
LogWhy yes
UMask
it seems like in addition to the softstart issue, the init script is in
need of some attention?
it runs start-stop-daemon to check the config and start the process, but
both commands are or'd with a return 1 or return 2. the check to handle
exit status 78 can never happen, because the only way
Public bug reported:
when starting opendkim, if ldap is in use and the server cannot be
contacted, opendkim gets stuck in a state where the system appears to
think it has started, but is not actually running:
systemctl -l status opendkim
● opendkim.service - LSB: Start the OpenDKIM service
there was an apparmor message logged:
May 6 22:52:05 server kernel: audit: type=1400
audit(1430967118.381:12): apparmor=DENIED operation=mkdir
profile=/usr/sbin/slapd name=/run/nslcd/ pid=1419 comm=slapd
requested_mask=c denied_mask=c fsuid=108 ouid=108
adding to
there was an apparmor message logged:
May 6 22:52:05 server kernel: audit: type=1400
audit(1430967118.381:12): apparmor=DENIED operation=mkdir
profile=/usr/sbin/slapd name=/run/nslcd/ pid=1419 comm=slapd
requested_mask=c denied_mask=c fsuid=108 ouid=108
adding to
Public bug reported:
when used with the nss overlay, slapd fails to start, because
/var/run/nslcd/ does not exist, and slap cannot then create the socket
for this. additionally, creating the directory manually does not help,
because it disappears after every reboot.
1] lsb_release -rd
Public bug reported:
when used with the nss overlay, slapd fails to start, because
/var/run/nslcd/ does not exist, and slap cannot then create the socket
for this. additionally, creating the directory manually does not help,
because it disappears after every reboot.
1] lsb_release -rd
yes, it still has this behavior with 1.2.8-0ubuntu11.4
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1417288
Title:
unable to create snapshot
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
on http://www.openntpd.org/features.html , it says A ntpctl(8) command
for querying real-time synchronization status:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-
current/man8/ntpctl.8?query=ntpctl
this program doesn't appear to be included in the package.
1]
Public bug reported:
the following occurs when attempting to create a snapshot:
virsh # snapshot-create-as template-generic 'test_snapshot' 'test snapshot'
--disk-only --atomic
error: unsupported configuration: cannot generate external snapshot name for
disk 'vda' without source
virsh #
Public bug reported:
the following occurs when attempting to create a snapshot:
virsh # snapshot-create-as template-generic 'test_snapshot' 'test snapshot'
--disk-only --atomic
error: unsupported configuration: cannot generate external snapshot name for
disk 'vda' without source
virsh #
Public bug reported:
i've just upgraded to 14.10, and i see that linux-image-generic now
lists thermald as a dependency. is this really a genuine requirement
now, that without which a computer cannot be used?
can this be listed as a recommended or suggested dependency instead, so
that it is not
apport information
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387144/+attachment/4248156/+files/BootDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387144
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387144/+attachment/4248160/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387144/+attachment/4248158/+files/Lsusb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387144
Title:
why
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387144/+attachment/4248161/+files/ProcModules.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387144
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected utopic
** Description changed:
i've just upgraded to 14.10, and i see that linux-image-generic now
lists thermald as a dependency. is this really a genuine requirement
now, that without which a computer cannot be used?
- can this be
apport information
** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387144/+attachment/4248162/+files/UdevDb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387144
Title:
why
apport information
** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387144/+attachment/4248163/+files/UdevLog.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387144
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387144/+attachment/4248157/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387144
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387144/+attachment/4248159/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387144
Public bug reported:
note: i'm not certain this is the right package to file this against.
upon upgrading from 13.10 to 14.04, i noticed that on a number of
computers, haveged was consuming 100% cpu. in short, although the
systems claims that the pool size is 4096:
cat
apport information
** Description changed:
i'm seeing poor/intermittent/degrading network connectivity for guests,
when the host is using a bonded interface.
in a nutshell, the network configuration is as follows: the physical
interfaces [eth0 and eth1] are bonded together as bond0
apport information
** Description changed:
i'm seeing poor/intermittent/degrading network connectivity for guests,
when the host is using a bonded interface.
in a nutshell, the network configuration is as follows: the physical
interfaces [eth0 and eth1] are bonded together as bond0
i've added iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o br0 -p udp -m udp -j
CHECKSUM --checksum-fill:
iptables -vnt mangle -L --lin
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 44532 packets, 46M bytes)
num pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
Chain INPUT
i've added iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o br0 -p udp -m udp -j
CHECKSUM --checksum-fill:
iptables -vnt mangle -L --lin
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 44532 packets, 46M bytes)
num pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
Chain INPUT
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
i'm seeing poor/intermittent/degrading network connectivity for guests,
when the host is using a bonded interface.
in a nutshell, the network configuration is as follows: the physical
interfaces [eth0 and
no worries. i'm a bit embarrassed i couldn't offer a more directed
initial report.
i do believe the vhost_net module is installed and working:
lsmod | grep -i vhost
vhost_net 31874 1
macvtap18294 1 vhost_net
pp | grep -i vhost
root 2534 1 3 22:11 ?
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
i'm seeing poor/intermittent/degrading network connectivity for guests,
when the host is using a bonded interface.
in a nutshell, the network configuration is as follows: the physical
interfaces [eth0 and
no worries. i'm a bit embarrassed i couldn't offer a more directed
initial report.
i do believe the vhost_net module is installed and working:
lsmod | grep -i vhost
vhost_net 31874 1
macvtap18294 1 vhost_net
pp | grep -i vhost
root 2534 1 3 22:11 ?
Public bug reported:
port 465 is listed in /etc/services as smtps, but has been formally
assigned by iana to ssm [source specific multicast] for a long time.
smtps is a protocol that was never formally defined [i'm not aware of
any rfc which references it], and has been deprecated for well over
Public bug reported:
i'm seeing poor/intermittent/degrading network connectivity for guests,
when the host is using a bonded interface.
in a nutshell, the network configuration is as follows: the physical
interfaces [eth0 and eth1] are bonded together as bond0 [i've tried
various bond modes -
some more information - while running a ping from another physical host,
against a guest, i did a bit of testing with tshark:
192.168.1.123 - other physical host on network
192.168.1.60 - virtual host
192.168.1.70 - virtual guest
on the virtual host, the current active slave is eth0, so i
Public bug reported:
i'm seeing poor/intermittent/degrading network connectivity for guests,
when the host is using a bonded interface.
in a nutshell, the network configuration is as follows: the physical
interfaces [eth0 and eth1] are bonded together as bond0 [i've tried
various bond modes -
some more information - while running a ping from another physical host,
against a guest, i did a bit of testing with tshark:
192.168.1.123 - other physical host on network
192.168.1.60 - virtual host
192.168.1.70 - virtual guest
on the virtual host, the current active slave is eth0, so i
today, i happened to be upgrading a different computer from 12.04 to
12.10, and am again seeing this same message [although it is now more
difficult to diagnose since do-release-upgrade seems to now use screen].
what else can i do to help further troubleshoot this?
--
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
i don't have a bluetooth device in this computer, and would like to not
be forced to install this extra unnecessary package. please remove the
dependency, or since now by default, recommended software is
automatically installed, change the dependency to recommended instead.
sure - see below:
perl --version
This is perl 5, version 14, subversion 2 (v5.14.2) built for
x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-multi
(with 53 registered patches, see perl -V for more detail)
Copyright 1987-2011, Larry Wall
Perl may be copied only under the terms of either the Artistic License or the
sure - see below:
perl --version
This is perl 5, version 14, subversion 2 (v5.14.2) built for
x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-multi
(with 53 registered patches, see perl -V for more detail)
Copyright 1987-2011, Larry Wall
Perl may be copied only under the terms of either the Artistic License or the
Public bug reported:
when starting amavisd-new, the following can be seen in the log:
INFO: no optional modules: unicore::Canonical.pl unicore::Exact.pl
unicore::PVA.pl
those modules don't appear to be part of any ubuntu perl packages, and
iiuc, haven't been part of perl since ~5.8/5.9?
i'm
additional details:
lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS
Release:12.04
apt-cache policy amavisd-new
amavisd-new:
Installed: 1:2.6.5-0ubuntu3.2
Candidate: 1:2.6.5-0ubuntu3.2
Version table:
*** 1:2.6.5-0ubuntu3.2 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/
it's really not so much a question of if it hurts, or how much disk
space is needed. it's simply unnecessary. why not just mark the
packages as recommended - especially since for some time now recommended
packages are being installed by default. that way, under default
circumstances the
the only scenario in which recommended packages are not installed is if
they have deliberately been disabled, in which case surely the admin is
intelligent enough to install the package if needed. for the other
99.99% of cases, there will be no issue, as recommended packages will be
installed,
Public bug reported:
when starting amavisd-new, the following can be seen in the log:
INFO: no optional modules: unicore::Canonical.pl unicore::Exact.pl
unicore::PVA.pl
those modules don't appear to be part of any ubuntu perl packages, and
iiuc, haven't been part of perl since ~5.8/5.9?
i'm
additional details:
lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS
Release:12.04
apt-cache policy amavisd-new
amavisd-new:
Installed: 1:2.6.5-0ubuntu3.2
Candidate: 1:2.6.5-0ubuntu3.2
Version table:
*** 1:2.6.5-0ubuntu3.2 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/
Public bug reported:
hi-
i see that both libcups2 and libpcsclite1 are marked as dependencies.
i'm using openjdk-7-jre-headless on a computer that is not involved in
any way with printing or cups, nor with pc/sc or any smart card
services, and would not to not be forced to install these
On Aug 05, 2012, at 10.17, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hi Ben. This seems like a reasonable request. You should note that
upstream would prefer that people not use these password methods and
instead focus on SCRAM based methods. See the discussion on why this
module isn't in core here:
i gather this means that this module is independently implementing the
algorithm rather than using existing [openssl/gnutls/etc] libraries? is
there a compromise that might be reached?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
On Aug 05, 2012, at 10.17, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hi Ben. This seems like a reasonable request. You should note that
upstream would prefer that people not use these password methods and
instead focus on SCRAM based methods. See the discussion on why this
module isn't in core here:
i gather this means that this module is independently implementing the
algorithm rather than using existing [openssl/gnutls/etc] libraries? is
there a compromise that might be reached?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
there is an sha2 module in the openldap source contrib directory which
implements the following sha2 password hashing schemes:
{SSHA-512}
{SSHA-384}
{SSHA-256}
{SHA-512}
{SHA-384}
{SHA-256}
i'd like to have it included in the slapd package.
the module can be found in
Public bug reported:
there is an sha2 module in the openldap source contrib directory which
implements the following sha2 password hashing schemes:
{SSHA-512}
{SSHA-384}
{SSHA-256}
{SHA-512}
{SHA-384}
{SHA-256}
i'd like to have it included in the slapd package.
the module can be found in
Public bug reported:
qemu-kvm depends on the following undesirable packages:
libasound2
libpulse0
libx11-6
i'm using it on a server with no graphical environment/window manager
and no audio cards/need for audio processing, and wish to not be
required to install these additional packages. i'd
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1030610
Title:
qemu-kvm depends on undesirable additional packages
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1030612
Title:
libvirt depends on undesirable additional packages
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
libvirt depends on the following undesirable packages:
dnsmasq-base
libavahi-client3
libavahi-common-data
libavahi-common3
i'm using it on a system that has a functioning dns resolver, and i have
no interest in any mdns/zeroconf stuf., and wish to not be required to
install
Public bug reported:
linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic depends on the following undesirable
additional packages:
crda/wireless-crda
i'm using a server in which there are no [and never will be any]
wireless devices, and wish to not be required to install this additional
package. i'd like to ask that
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1030614
Title:
linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic depends on undesirable additional
packages
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
when upgrading from 11.10 to 12.04, do-release-upgrade complains
WARNING: Failed to read mirror file [see output below], but continues
and if the upgrade is proceeded with, it appears [at least upon a brief
inspection] to be successful.
digging a bit further with strace, it
Public bug reported:
lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 11.10
Release:11.10
apt-cache policy bind9
bind9:
Installed: 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu4.1
Candidate: 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu4.1
Version table:
*** 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu4.1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/
Public bug reported:
lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 11.10
Release:11.10
apt-cache policy bind9
bind9:
Installed: 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu4.1
Candidate: 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu4.1
Version table:
*** 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu4.1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/
Public bug reported:
previous to 11.04, if /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules was
deleted, it would be automatically regenerated at boot. this appears to
now not be happening.
if run manually, write_net_rules complains missing valid match -
although i don't know if this is necesarily
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected natty
** Description changed:
previous to 11.04, if /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules was
deleted, it would be automatically regenerated at boot. this appears to
now not be happening.
if run manually, write_net_rules
apport information
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802538/+attachment/2182815/+files/Dependencies.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802538
apport information
** Attachment added: Lspci.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802538/+attachment/2182817/+files/Lspci.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802538
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802538/+attachment/2182818/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802538
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802538/+attachment/2182819/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802538/+attachment/2182820/+files/ProcModules.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802538
apport information
** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802538/+attachment/2182821/+files/UdevDb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802538
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802538/+attachment/2182822/+files/UdevLog.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802538
Title:
thanks for finding that. indeed, if i comment that out as you suggest,
70-persistent-net.rules is automatically generated by the system.
perhaps this was meant to address situations in which the os is a vmware
host? obviously when the os is a vmware guest, this result in
undesirable
to add a bit of detail here - this is a vmware esx 4 environment, with a
number of hosts providing a number of guests, with the typical
characteristics of this sort of environment [shared storage from a san
array, vmotion, etc. etc.]. in this particular scenario, a minimal
ubuntu server install is
Public bug reported:
it appears that in 2.4.23-0ubuntu3, the nssov overlay is absent from the
package. this was not the case in the previous version
(2.4.21-0ubuntu5.2). the following files are missing:
/usr/lib/ldap/nssov.la
/usr/lib/ldap/nssov.so
/usr/lib/ldap/nssov.so.0
Public bug reported:
it appears that in 2.4.23-0ubuntu3, the nssov overlay is absent from the
package. this was not the case in the previous version
(2.4.21-0ubuntu5.2). the following files are missing:
/usr/lib/ldap/nssov.la
/usr/lib/ldap/nssov.so
/usr/lib/ldap/nssov.so.0
that's a good point. i'm not terribly familiar with ubuntu/debian
packaging particulars, but could a meta package be used, that could be
satisfied with either nslcd or slapd? would that allow for flexibility,
while not breaking upgrades?
--
nss-pam-ldapd should not depend on nslcd
Public bug reported:
since the nssov slapd overlay can also provide the necessary components
for the stub libraries to work, nss-pam-ldapd should not explicitly
depend on nslcd. users using the overlay would have no need for nslcd,
and therefore it would not need to be installed.
** Affects:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ldap-auth-client
it appears that during the configuration process, /etc/ldap/ldap.conf is
deleted. as the openldap libraries rely on this file, it should be left
alone.
** Affects: ldap-auth-client (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status:
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
