@cjwatson @paelzer Any chance we could backport that patch for xenial as
SRU? It's a long standing bug and helps superb with automation of Ubuntu
LTS for web plattforms. We like to use it for easy and user specific
conf.d style client config updates in deployment scenarios.
--
You received this
#Fixed LTS package versions: 2.23-0ubuntu7 (xenial) & 2.19-0ubuntu6.11
(trusty)
@jozznaz, jm7485 & co: You're not alone for me it was way more than 50
boxes where the PHP stuff couldn't resolve names anymore and needed my
attention. Nasty and frustrating for sure ... and i was also swearing ;)
@Nish & Co: Actually Marc put that into -security so i am facing:
"Package 'php7.0-fpm' has conffile prompt and needs to be upgraded
manually" on a lot of machines with pure (lame) MySQL. But it's a
regression fix to a security update, but no real security update right?
--
You received this bug
This bug is still present! I am sorry but i don't have access to the HW
atm, so someone else needs to take over :)
@Bryan Can you do that?
** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Okay Thomas and thanks for clarification. With PHP7 we need to change
the configurations anyway, so just need to follow your recommendation
http://dark-net.net/?p=125 , meaning switching to a config like:
location ~ \.php$ {
include /etc/nginx/snippets/fastcgi-php.conf;
fastcgi_pass
Public bug reported:
Coming from trusty in our production environments for running modern
LEMP stacks we just noticed that on xenial the nginx-common package
(1.10.0-0ubuntu0.16.04.2) is missing a fastcgi parameter that was
available before on trusty. The missing parameter in
@Thomas I just subscribed you as you're the king of the relevant
debian/changelog and i would like to discuss the case with you :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1602756
Title:
@penalvch I understand and would like to identify it, but unfortunately
i can't trigger that bug on neither my x220 nor my x230 while all T450s
should have problems with external display and docking stations. With
linux-*-lts-* packages it will at least be resolved at least in autum :)
--
You
@penalvch Thanks for the info, but can you assist us on how to test and
get a fix in xenial's kernel. I am out of kernel packaging since 2.6.33
and want to help to make xenial working on Thinkpads with docking
stations.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
@Hubert Of course it doesn't need a bisect when you already know the
commit the fixes it :) But i would sugest that we try to get it fixed in
xenial's kernel first. Unfortunately i can't assign the kernel team, can
you help out here?
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete =>
I actually switch back to my x230 and don't have the hardware for
testing, but we should really bisect this issue so the current xenial
kernel can be fixed.
Anyone who wants to help can test those kernels
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/MainlineBuilds especially the late 4.4
and the early 4.5 i
@pavel See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/MainlineBuilds and try which
newer kernel solves the issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550779
Title:
[i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO
@Christopher To demand a full bisect for the status "confirmed" is IMHO
much over the edge, especially as it takes some time to trigger the bug.
@PocketSam Although Chrisopher's advice is right to follow, if you
gather the information with which mainline kernel the bug disapers it
would still be
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550779 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550779
@Bryan Yeah that's why open source collaboration rocks :) I will mark
the bug duplicate and we should follow the other one for getting the fix
backported.
For all T450s owner that might find this bug, you
FYI as i just noticed it happens on the first and secondary screen with
the known error:
May 23 14:16:23 HOSTNAME kernel: [18314.479875]
[drm:intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe B FIFO
underrun
** Summary changed:
- [Thinkpad T450s] Screen flickering on second monitor
Can confirm the same behaviour on an T450s i am testing for a colleague
with the Thinkpad Ultra Dock (40A2) and two NEC EA244WMi attached via
Displayport.
The frequency is always changing from one till 30 times per hour. But i
think i also got the flickering and screen off at the third and
@Robie: Fully agree on that. It was just for the record so nobody thinks
this is a security enhancement like isolating PHP5 with LX* but rather a
way for still migrating a server to xenial. Beside the container hype
it's by nature more complex and tricky to do isolation with containers
than
@Nish Sorry for the late reply:
> 3 years *should* be sufficient time to move to PHP7.0 -- but that's
just my opinion (and wouldn't PHP5 be out of support by then anyways?)
In theory yes, but in practice not. I.e. my company just launched a
Drupal 7 project last week and won't except a relaunch
@Nish thanks for clarification :) I can fully understand the decision,
but it's still a burden for any PHP5 project there having only a three
year LTS from Ubuntu left. Just been to a Drupal Conference this weekend
and for example we will probably never see Drupal 7 in production "on
anything"
@Nish You mean the only available PHP in main or did i miss something
about php5.6 in universe?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522422
Title:
Update to php 7.0
To manage
@Nish Yes Drupal 7 doesn't yet support 7.0 and as much as i like Debian
packages it makes more sense to deploy Drupal with Git.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522422
Title:
Update
@Nish Yes Drupal 7 doesn't yet support 7.0 and as much as i like Debian
packages it makes more sense to deploy Drupal with Git.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522422
> @bhat3 there's no direct dependency on apache2. php7.0 package just
pulls first SAPI and coincidentally it's libapache2-mod-php7. 0
Thanks for clarification :) Just followed Joost claim, altough i never
ran into that with PHP itself, but experienced that with PHP related
packages like "
> @bhat3 there's no direct dependency on apache2. php7.0 package just
pulls first SAPI and coincidentally it's libapache2-mod-php7. 0
Thanks for clarification :) Just followed Joost claim, altough i never
ran into that with PHP itself, but experienced that with PHP related
packages like "
> 1) I was surprised that the PHP package seems to have a dependency on
Apache. I understood later that php can depend on a number of packages,
including php-fpm, and that Apache is simply the first it finds. No
biggie, something for the tutorials :)
@Nish Since Nginx it also in main it would be
> 1) I was surprised that the PHP package seems to have a dependency on
Apache. I understood later that php can depend on a number of packages,
including php-fpm, and that Apache is simply the first it finds. No
biggie, something for the tutorials :)
@Nish Since Nginx it also in main it would be
@Nish Can you explain the changes or diff to Ondřej's packages? I run
them in production with Typo3 7 and Drupal 8 but on trusty.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522422
@Nish Can you explain the changes or diff to Ondřej's packages? I run
them in production with Typo3 7 and Drupal 8 but on trusty.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522422
Title:
Update
@Nish Coming just back from FOSDEM and had some more talks about PHP
7.0. As you said right when Canonical is only able to maintain one PHP
in main, then it should really be 7.0 or the supported PHP will have
double load and half the speed compared. In summer when xenial is
heading for production
@Nish Coming just back from FOSDEM and had some more talks about PHP
7.0. As you said right when Canonical is only able to maintain one PHP
in main, then it should really be 7.0 or the supported PHP will have
double load and half the speed compared. In summer when xenial is
heading for production
@marmotte31: Don't get confused the community packaged 7.0 for Debian
and Ubuntu and so far it's in universe. Now it's Canonical's take if
they will support it in main. For helping you can test xenial and PHP7.0
on some dev machines or look for missing packages:
@marmotte31: Don't get confused the community packaged 7.0 for Debian
and Ubuntu and so far it's in universe. Now it's Canonical's take if
they will support it in main. For helping you can test xenial and PHP7.0
on some dev machines or look for missing packages:
@Dimitri I was also right before doing the packaging in case no one of
the other affected people already gave it a shot. If you start packaging
please keep us informed.
As Bojo stated we need to get the package into Debian first, for getting
it into xenial.
--
You received this bug notification
For the packaging it self see:
https://github.com/oerdnj/deb.sury.org/issues/239
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539133
Title:
[needs-packaging] php-gmagick
To manage notifications
Public bug reported:
Initial import from Debian for xenial
In the course of getting the PHP 7.0 support solid for xenial, we
stumpled over the missing support for GraphicsMagick while ImageMagick
is already done.
Ondřej just did the packaging and takes care of bringing it into Debian.
After
For anyone interessted in gmagick follow:
https://github.com/oerdnj/deb.sury.org/issues/239
@Nish What about further communication from the server team, can you
keep as informed over here? I think there's not so much need for much
more discussion, as the points should be clear now. BTW RedHat
For anyone interessted in gmagick follow:
https://github.com/oerdnj/deb.sury.org/issues/239
@Nish What about further communication from the server team, can you
keep as informed over here? I think there's not so much need for much
more discussion, as the points should be clear now. BTW RedHat
Just one last practical thought on dual stack in main (option 2), that
would mean you can officially run i.e. Drupal 7 & Drupal 8 or Typo3 6 &
Typo3 7 on one server in parallel (using those sexy FPM setups i run
with up to 100 pools per server for app seperation).
So a supported and slick dual
Just one last practical thought on dual stack in main (option 2), that
would mean you can officially run i.e. Drupal 7 & Drupal 8 or Typo3 6 &
Typo3 7 on one server in parallel (using those sexy FPM setups i run
with up to 100 pools per server for app seperation).
So a supported and slick dual
To stop further disinformation most of PHP 7 is already packaged for
xenial:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=php7=names=xenial=all
So let's concentrate on whats missing. I think we're missing some
extensions so far like:
php7.0-mysqlnd (neither in Ondřej's PPA or Ubuntu!)
imagemagick
@Ondřej Nice to know, but for clarification:
mysqlnd: that means we're using mysqlnd now by default and there is only
one package now?
imagick: php5-imagick is also the package for PHP 7?
gmagick: Here, asking for it ;) No serious i can really reduce the load
on servers and with the 2.0.0
@Ondřej Nice to know, but for clarification:
mysqlnd: that means we're using mysqlnd now by default and there is only
one package now?
imagick: php5-imagick is also the package for PHP 7?
gmagick: Here, asking for it ;) No serious i can really reduce the load
on servers and with the 2.0.0
To stop further disinformation most of PHP 7 is already packaged for
xenial:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=php7=names=xenial=all
So let's concentrate on whats missing. I think we're missing some
extensions so far like:
php7.0-mysqlnd (neither in Ondřej's PPA or Ubuntu!)
imagemagick
@Nish: Big thanks for sharing the thoughts of the server team and that
you take this issue serious :) Running quite a lot web servers with PHP
on Ubuntu LTS and RHEL in prodution, i like give you some short feedback
on the mentioned options:
1 & 4: are a no go if Ubuntu Server wants to stay as
@Nish: Big thanks for sharing the thoughts of the server team and that
you take this issue serious :) Running quite a lot web servers with PHP
on Ubuntu LTS and RHEL in prodution, i like give you some short feedback
on the mentioned options:
1 & 4: are a no go if Ubuntu Server wants to stay as
45 matches
Mail list logo
