Re: [Bug 499891] Re: Unstable wireless connection after upgrading from 9.04 to 9.10
On 01/07/12 14:09, Thomas Hood wrote: Do you see this every time it disconnects?: wlan0: disassociated (Reason: 14) Don't you think that, after 2 and a half years I posted this bug, I have installed something else on my PC? Ciao -- bronto -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/499891 Title: Wi-Fi connection lost every minute -- iwlagn To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/499891/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 307462] Re: ruby is slow because of --enable-pthreads
I'd add my 0.02. Maybe you could provide two different packages for ruby, the current stock version and another one compiled with --disable-pthreads? I've just filed this wishlist entry to Debian: http://bugs.debian.org /cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579229 Ciao --bronto ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #579229 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579229 -- ruby is slow because of --enable-pthreads https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307462 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 499891] [NEW] Unstable wireless connection after upgrading from 9.04 to 9.10
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager Hello there I am quite undecided where to file this bug, but as far as I can see it could be something between Network Manager and something in the kernel (drivers)? The NM version I was using was the following (I had to switch to wicd): bro...@lotus:~$ sudo apt-cache policy network-manager network-manager: Installed: (none) Candidate: 0.8~a~git.20091013t193206.679d548-0ubuntu1 Version table: 0.8~a~git.20091013t193206.679d548-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 0.7.1~rc4.1.cf199a964-0ubuntu2 0 500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages As Google reveals, I am one of those users that experimented problems with wireless connections after the upgrade from 9.04 to 9.10. After the upgrade, NM successfully connects to the wireless network, but it loses it after less than a minute. It retries to connect short after, and may succeed again, to lose it once again less than a minute later. To understand if this was a NM problem I did the following: 1) disabled wireless from NM, added this entry to /etc/network/interfaces: iface wlan0 inet dhcp wpa-ssid WiFiBronto wpa-psk PutYourKeyOnLaunchpad! ifup wlan0 successfully configures the interface, and the connection is stable. 2) used wicd instead of NM: the connection is stable 3) removed the connection from NM and re-created it from scratch: the connection is UNSTABLE 4) reset the AP to factory settings and reconfigured: the connection is UNSTABLE 5) installed the latest kernel from jaunty, booted it: the connection is stable (but, unfortunately, I have no audio...) Messages in the logs in case of unstable connection are similar to the ones I am attaching from /var/log/syslog My Ubuntu installation is a pretty standard one, that started as a 8.04 and was upgraded up to 9.10. The only non-standard configuration is that I eventually had to disable pulseaudio due to crappy audio and high CPU consumption (I think it was at 8.10). bro...@lotus:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 9.10 Release:9.10 My PC is an HP Compaq 8710w laptop. The wireless card, as reported by lspci, is: bro...@lotus:~$ lspci | grep -i wireless 10:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 4965 AG or AGN [Kedron] Network Connection (rev 61) The driver is a iwlagn: bro...@lotus:~$ lsmod | grep iwl iwlagn109052 0 iwlcore 112540 1 iwlagn mac80211 181076 2 iwlagn,iwlcore cfg80211 93052 3 iwlagn,iwlcore,mac80211 led_class 4096 3 iwlcore,sdhci,hp_accel Is this a real bug or I did something wrong? Thanks in advance for any solution you could provide. Ciao --bronto ** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Unstable wireless connection after upgrading from 9.04 to 9.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/499891 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 499891] Re: Unstable wireless connection after upgrading from 9.04 to 9.10
** Attachment added: a commented excerpt from syslog, right after the upgrade http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37134390/syslog -- Unstable wireless connection after upgrading from 9.04 to 9.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/499891 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134285] Re: (046d:0850) QuickCam Web doesn't work in Feisty, Gutsy, Hardy
I don't have the quickcam available anymore (I changed jobs), therefore I can't neither test nor try to contribute to the solution of this bug, sorry :-( Ciao --M -- (046d:0850) QuickCam Web doesn't work in Feisty, Gutsy, Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134285 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 134285] Re: (046d:0850) QuickCam Web doesn't work in Feisty, Gutsy, Hardy
Leann Ogasawara wrote: 1) If you are comfortable installing packages on your own, the linux- image-2.6.27-* package is currently available for you to install and test. Hello there Sorry for being so late, but I was on holiday at first, and sick then :-( No good news, unfortunately. I installed the new kernel and fired up skype, then went in options-video devices and pressed the Test button. Skype crashes. This happens deterministically, either if skype is still setting up its connection or if the connection is already ok. In case you need more info, just let me know. Ciao --bronto -- (046d:0850) QuickCam Web doesn't work in Feisty, Gutsy, Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134285 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190950] Re: [hardy] gnome-desktop-environment depends on non-existent package
Well, this is still present on amd64 -- [hardy] gnome-desktop-environment depends on non-existent package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190950 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222803] Re: Java broken in openoffice hardy upgrades
Hello I can't tell if I hit an upgrade bug, since it is the first time I use the wizards, anyway here we go. When I tried to use the Fax wizard, I got a warning dialog. The dialog recommended to configure a JRE in the settings, and to install openoffice.org-java-common. The package was already in place. Configured OO to use the JRE 1.6 I had already installed. No way. I removed JRE 1.6, installed JRE 1.5 and reconfigured OO to use it: no way. Starting OO from the command line returned a javaldx failed error, and nothing more. I reinstalled openoffice.org-java-common: no way I installed both JRE 1.6 and 1.5 and configured it to use 1.6: no way. At that point I tried again to run from the command line. After trying to use the fax wizard I got this error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ oowriter javaldx failed! [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ [Java framework]sunjavaplugin.so could not load Java runtime library: file:///usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.03/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ I didn't have any java-6-sun-1.6.0.03, I have java-6-sun-1.6.0.06 instead. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib/jvm# ln -s java-6-sun-1.6.0.06 java-6-sun-1.6.0.03 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib/jvm# ls -l total 8 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 2008-06-01 11:59 java-1.5.0-sun - java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.15 drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 4096 2008-06-01 11:59 java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.15 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2008-06-01 12:50 java-6-sun - java-6-sun-1.6.0.06 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2008-06-01 12:58 java-6-sun-1.6.0.03 - java-6-sun-1.6.0.06 drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 4096 2008-06-01 12:50 java-6-sun-1.6.0.06 Now it works. So, either the wrong path is hardcoded somewhere, or a setting is not being updated. I hope this helps. Ciao --bronto -- Java broken in openoffice hardy upgrades https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134285] Re: (046d:0850) QuickCam Web doesn't work in Feisty and Gutsy
Hello
I have a quickcam, as well, and it doesn't work with Skype, but maybe I
found a new clue. It's like Skype it's reading the image in YUV format,
despite the torgb setting of the driver.
Let me explain this one better.
This is the ID of the cam:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# lsusb | grep -i quick
Bus 002 Device 003: ID 046d:0850 Logitech, Inc. QuickCam Web
and this are the current settings:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# qcset -i
Name : Logitech QuickCam USB
Type : capture subcapture
Channels : 1
Audio devices : 0
Maxsize : 356,292
Minsize : 32,32
Overlay coords: 0,0
Capture size : 356,292
Chromakey : 0
Flags :
Channel : 0
Name : Camera
Tuners: 0
Flags :
Type : camera
Norm : 47097
Brightness: 32768
Hue : 32768
Color : 32768
Contrast : 32768
Whiteness : 32768
Depth : 24
Palette : RGB888 packed into 24bit words.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# for OPTION in debug qcdebug keepsettings settle subsample
compress frameskip quality adaptive equalize userlut retryerrors compatible
video_nr ; do echo -n $OPTION: ; qcset ${OPTION}? ; done
debug: common
qcdebug: common
keepsettings: n
settle: 0
subsample: n
compress: n
frameskip: 0
quality: best
adaptive: y
equalize: n
userlut: -1208520159
retryerrors: y
compatible: torgb
video_nr: -1
Now, using gqcam, setting RGB in the preferences and pushing Apply,
the image is ok (files: Screenshot-gqcam - Logitech QuickCam USB.png
and Screenshot-gqcam.png). If I select YUV instead, and press Apply,
the resulting image is pretty similar to what you get in other programs,
e.g.: skype.
Note also that the wecam started misbehaving right after I switched from
Debian testing to Ubuntu 7.04, nearly one year ago. The same webcam with
the same driver and the same version of Skype worked flawlessly in
Debian. The same thing happened to Wengophone, that worked ok with that
webcam until I switched to Ubuntu.
I hope this information is useful to catch the problem.
Ciao
--bronto
** Attachment added: A collection of screenshots
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14368260/screenshots.tar.gz
--
(046d:0850) QuickCam Web doesn't work in Feisty and Gutsy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134285
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200952] Re: [hardy] iwl3945 Intel 3945 ABG cannot connect to AP with hidden ESSID
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 200950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200950 Same problem here with that network card. I am using an HP Compaq nx7400. The wireless button LED is on. I am configuring a network with a given ESSID and WEP hex key using network manager. The AP is hidden, and since is our company's wireless network, I can't unhide it. We have two cases here I am trying to isolate. Case 1) Despite the interface gets a valid configuration (addresses for DNS servers and gateway are correct; interface IP, netmask and broadcast addresses are correct, too), I can't even ping the gateway (ping results in an Destination host unreachable error). Case 2) the network interface doesn't even get a valid address Doing a /etc/init.d/networking restart makes the wireless interface usable Please ask me anything useful to solve this bug (files, command outputs...) and I'll be happy to help. Ciao --Marco -- [hardy] iwl3945 Intel 3945 ABG cannot connect to AP with hidden ESSID https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200950] Re: [iwl3945] network manager not able to associate to hidden SSID (scan_capa = 0x0)
Hello I erroneously reported in #200952. Please bear with me, it was my first bug report! Same problem here with Intel 3945 ABG. I am using an HP Compaq nx7400. The wireless button LED is on. I am configuring a network with a given ESSID and WEP hex key using network manager. The AP is hidden, and since is our company's wireless network, I can't unhide it to test. We have two cases here I am trying to isolate. Case 1) Despite the interface gets a valid configuration (addresses for DNS servers and gateway are correct; interface IP, netmask and broadcast addresses are correct, too), I can't even ping the gateway (ping results in an Destination host unreachable error). Case 2) the network interface doesn't even get a valid address Doing a /etc/init.d/networking restart makes the wireless interface usable Please ask me anything useful to solve this bug (files, command outputs...) and I'll be happy to help. Ciao --Marco -- [iwl3945] network manager not able to associate to hidden SSID (scan_capa = 0x0) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200950 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200950] Re: [iwl3945] network manager not able to associate to hidden SSID (scan_capa = 0x0)
Forgot to say: I am using Hardy, so the bug is still there in the final release... Ciao --Marco -- [iwl3945] network manager not able to associate to hidden SSID (scan_capa = 0x0) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200950 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
