[Bug 1904906] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-25 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-11-25 21:40 EDT--- Ok, so sadly I cannot find a tarball with the patches not already applied, which is very frustrating. However, it turns out I don't need that because, as it turns out... Doing an upstream checkout of v5.10-rc4 and building

[Bug 1904906] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-25 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-11-25 06:47 EDT--- Hi, Thanks, I'll look at sources tarball, hopefully tomorrow. (I'm in AU, so no thanksgiving here!) Have you tested this on any of your local systems? I can't get it to work much on P9, even on stock hardware/qemu without

[Bug 1904906] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-24 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-11-25 00:34 EDT--- Hi, Looks like it fails to boot on a p9 qemu/kvm guest even out of grub: hangs trying to bring up SMP. That's probably what we saw in bare-metal too, the console probably just didn't catch up. I will continue investigating,

[Bug 1905393] [NEW] Ubuntu 20.04: opal-prd fails to start on 20.04

2020-11-24 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: == Comment: #0 - VASANT HEGDE - 2020-11-23 23:23:22 == ---Problem Description--- opal-prd fails to start on 20.04 Contact Information = Vasant hegde ---uname output--- Ubuntu 20.04 Machine Type = All Power System ---Steps to Reproduce--- opal-prd fails to start on

[Bug 1904906] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-11-24 02:07 EDT--- Hi, Ok, I have been experimenting with the hirsute kernel: 5.10.0-4-generic #5-Ubuntu It boots without issue on a pseries guest with secure boot both on and off. However, this doesn't exercise booting out of kexec. Booting

[Bug 1903814] for 18.04

2020-11-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment on attachment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-23 11:20 EDT--- The attached patch applies cleanly to binutils-2_30 tag and binutils_2.30-21ubuntu1~18.04.4ubuntu1. ** Attachment added: "for 18.04"

[Bug 1899582] Re: ceph: fix inode number handling on arches with 32-bit ino_t

2020-11-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From tuan.hoa...@ibm.com 2020-11-23 06:18 EDT--- Hello, I tested the latest kernel 5.4.0.55.58 (#61) in 'proposed-focal' and it seems to work just fine. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1903817] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-20 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From stefan.schulze.frielingh...@ibm.com 2020-11-20 10:37 EDT--- The problem boils down to a buffer overflow. Consider the following code snippet from file pair_dist.c int iChunkStarts[iNumberOfThreads]; int iChunkEnds[iNumberOfThreads]; // ... for(iChunk = 0; iChunk <=

[Bug 1904884] mm_page_idle.c_skip_offline_pages-backport.patch

2020-11-20 Thread bugproxy
Default Comment by Bridge ** Attachment added: "mm_page_idle.c_skip_offline_pages-backport.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904884/+attachment/5436363/+files/mm_page_idle.c_skip_offline_pages-backport.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1904884] mm_page_idle.c_skip_offline_pages-backport.patch

2020-11-20 Thread bugproxy
Default Comment by Bridge ** Attachment added: "mm_page_idle.c_skip_offline_pages-backport.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904884/+attachment/5436362/+files/mm_page_idle.c_skip_offline_pages-backport.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1904884] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-20 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From geral...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-20 09:50 EDT--- (In reply to comment #14) > suggested bionic backport for /mm/page_idle.c Hmm, not sure if I read this diff correcty, but it seems to remove struct zone and spinlock, which would not be right, and introduce a new bug. The

[Bug 1903288] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-19 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-11-19 20:25 EDT--- Hi, I think that's the only feature patch required. There's not a lot because at this stage it's all based on static keys. So unlike the OpenPower secure boot, there's no code to interact with keys stored in firmware. There

[Bug 1904906] [NEW] 5.10 kernel fails to boot with secure boot disabled

2020-11-19 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: Canonical requests to test the secure boot for the 5.10 kernel but kernel fails to boot with secure boot disabled. The 5.10 kernel can be found in: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-team/+archive/ubuntu/bootstrap They can be installed by installing the

[Bug 1904884] Re: [UBUNUT 20.04] s390: dbginfo.sh triggers kernel panic, reading from /sys/kernel/mm/page_idle/bitmap

2020-11-19 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-19 10:17 EDT--- Reduced importance from "ship issue" to "high", not a real ship issue, but is mandatory to be fixed within the service stream ** Tags removed: severity-critical ** Tags added: severity-high -- You received this bug

[Bug 1904884] [NEW] [UBUNUT 20.04] s390: dbginfo.sh triggers kernel panic, reading from /sys/kernel/mm/page_idle/bitmap

2020-11-19 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: System hangs on dbginfo.sh script execution. Solution: Commit 92fb1db26eef ("mm/page_idle.c: skip offline pages") Included upstream since kernel v5.8, so it is already included in Ubuntu 20.10, but not in 20.04 and earlier. Commit 92fb1db26eef ("mm/page_idle.c: skip

[Bug 1887806] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-19 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-19 08:27 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with H -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887806 Title: [21.04

[Bug 1887920] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-19 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-19 08:25 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with H -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887920 Title: [21.04

[Bug 1902047] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-19 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-19 08:24 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released with H -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902047 Title: [21.04

[Bug 1902865] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-19 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-19 08:24 EDT--- IBM Buzgilla status-> closed, Fix Released with H -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902865 Title: [21.04

[Bug 1859018] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-18 09:38 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released for all requested distros.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1859018] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-18 08:48 EDT--- After investigation , not required for bionic... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859018 Title: [UBUNTU

[Bug 1903814] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-18 08:42 EDT--- Ok, let me see if I can port tests as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903814 Title: [binutils] Prevent GOT

[Bug 1884514] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-18 08:36 EDT--- @xnox, sorry, I didn't quite get your comment - do you need some info about gzip from us? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1860574] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-18 08:01 EDT--- IBM Buzgilla status-> closed, Fix released for all requested distros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1860574] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-18 07:03 EDT--- After internal discussion, this feature is not required for bionic.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1902179] nvme-ipl s390-tools patch 0003 of 0003 for focal-proposed

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment (attachment only) From jjhe...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-17 16:21 EDT--- ** Attachment added: "nvme-ipl s390-tools patch 0003 of 0003 for focal-proposed"

[Bug 1902179] nvme-ipl s390-tools patch 0002 of 0003 for focal-proposed

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment (attachment only) From jjhe...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-17 16:21 EDT--- ** Attachment added: "nvme-ipl s390-tools patch 0002 of 0003 for focal-proposed"

[Bug 1902179] nvme-ipl s390-tools patch 0001 of 0003 for focal-proposed

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment (attachment only) From jjhe...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-17 16:20 EDT--- ** Attachment added: "nvme-ipl s390-tools patch 0001 of 0003 for focal-proposed" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902179/+attachment/5435246/+files/0001-zipl-Support-nvme-devices.patch -- You received

[Bug 1902179] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From jjhe...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-17 16:23 EDT--- I've attached the three backported s390-tools patches for focal-proposed. They received a basic compile test and a very quick "it runs" sanity check. If we need more testing at this stage, let me know and I'll see about getting

[Bug 1902694] Re: Undetected Data corruption in MPI workloads that use VSX for reductions on POWER9 DD2.1 systems

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From wa...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-17 11:58 EDT--- Verified for focal and groovy: 20.04: waiki@ltc-wspoon3:~/DI/code/boot$ ~/mpe.py vmlinux-5.4.0-55-generic System.map-5.4.0-55-generic stvx found using register r28: c002cbfc: ce e1 00 7c stvxv0,0,r28 addi

[Bug 1896216] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-11-17 09:58 EDT--- (In reply to comment #16) > This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the > problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the > problem is solved, change the tag

[Bug 1904585] Re: opal-prd: Have a worker process handle page offlining (Fixes "PlatServices: dyndealloc memory_error() failed" is getting reported in error log (opal-prd))

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin--- ** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin18045 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904585 Title: opal-prd: Have a worker process handle page offlining

[Bug 1904585] [NEW] opal-prd: Have a worker process handle page offlining (Fixes "PlatServices: dyndealloc memory_error() failed" is getting reported in error log (opal-prd))

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: --Problem Description--- https://github.com/open- power/skiboot/commit/8cbd0de88d162e387f11569eee1bdecef8fad2e3 opal-prd: Have a worker process handle page offlining The memory_error() hservice interface expects the memory_error() call to just accept the offline request

[Bug 1902179] Re: [20.04 FEAT] Support/enhancement of NVMe IPL

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
** Tags added: verification-done-focal verification-done-groovy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902179 Title: [20.04 FEAT] Support/enhancement of NVMe IPL To manage notifications

[Bug 1902179] Re: [20.04 FEAT] Support/enhancement of NVMe IPL

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
** Tags removed: verification-done-focal verification-done-groovy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902179 Title: [20.04 FEAT] Support/enhancement of NVMe IPL To manage notifications

[Bug 1902179] Re: [20.04 FEAT] Support/enhancement of NVMe IPL

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal verification-needed-groovy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902179 Title: [20.04 FEAT] Support/enhancement of NVMe IPL To manage

[Bug 1904419] Re: Ugrade glibc 2.32 by required upstream patches

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-17 02:52 EDT--- affects 2.32, hence SRU to G requested, yes ** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin2004 ** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2010 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1902179] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-16 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From jjhe...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-16 14:19 EDT--- (In reply to comment #60) > Hi Jan, yes (almost) all Ubuntu packages are hosted nowadays at our > Launchpad git (at least all packages in main, incl. s390-tools). > Please see: https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools

[Bug 1902179] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-16 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From jan.hoepp...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-16 11:16 EDT--- Canonical, are there public s390-tools repositories with the Ubuntu versions available that we can mirror internally and which we could then use for potential backport work (such as this feature seems to require)? Please

[Bug 1904419] [NEW] Ugrade glibc 2.32 by required upstream patches

2020-11-16 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: The current libc6-2.32-0ubuntu3 package lacks some of the upstream glibc commits on the "release/2.32/master" branch (see http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release/2.32/master). Does Ubuntu automatically pick the commits from this release branch?

[Bug 1882502] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-16 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-16 06:50 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with requested distros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882502

[Bug 1902874] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-13 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-13 06:58 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with hirsuite -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902874 Title:

[Bug 1902870] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-13 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-13 06:57 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with hirsuite -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902870 Title:

[Bug 1877533] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-13 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mihaj...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-13 04:03 EDT--- This is a setup without crypto cards (Secure Execution guests don't support passthrough yet). I think that we can live with the new kdump default settings, as I wouldn't want to suggest putting half of the memory away for kdump

[Bug 1854148] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-12 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From jschm...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-12 11:07 EDT--- Hello Brian, Good news: I could verify your ppa successfully. I ran into several problems setting up a test system for this verification, but finally got it to work. Output from the pkcsep11_migrate utility without your ppa: #

[Bug 1838743] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-12 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-12 09:39 EDT--- Some update info: Here is the PR: https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/pull/631 No reaction from the maintainer though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1903984] [NEW] Cannot run zcryptstats in the Hosting Appliance

2020-11-12 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: ---Problem Description--- I have had trouble collecting data via the zcryptstats (https://github.com/ibm-s390-tools/s390-tools/blob/master/zconf/zcrypt/zcryptstats.c) tool for our Hosting Appliance - VPC environment. Basically, the tool reports data for only the last two

[Bug 1903817] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-12 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-12 03:58 EDT--- Are there any suspicious warnings in the compile log? What about "-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing"? Does it work with these options? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1903288] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-11 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-11-12 01:12 EDT--- Hi, So, here are what I believe are the relevant kernel changes. Firstly, there is a common core with the support for OpenPower/PowerNV Secure Boot - LP#1866909 and friends. This covers things like securing kexec under

[Bug 1903682] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-11 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-11-11 11:10 EDT--- (In reply to comment #9) > I've build patches kernel packages and shared them here for further > reference and testing: > https://people.canonical.com/~fheimes/lp1903682/ I've just repeated the original test with this kernel

[Bug 1878596] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-11 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-11 10:36 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, documented within the BZ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878596 Title:

[Bug 1903817] Re: Clustalo 1.2.4-6 segfaults on s390x

2020-11-11 Thread bugproxy
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-189191 severity-high targetmilestone-inin2004 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903817 Title: Clustalo 1.2.4-6 segfaults on s390x To

[Bug 1903814] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-11 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-11 03:58 EDT--- Please provide the patch for bionic. We don't see an urgent need for Xenial(runs out of base support in April 2021). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1854148] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-11 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-11 03:56 EDT--- IBM will take a look . Sorry for the delay... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854148 Title: [UBUNTU]

[Bug 1903814] [NEW] [binutils] Prevent GOT access rewrite for certain symbols

2020-11-10 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: Please backport the following bugfix into Ubuntu LTS: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=e6213e09ed0e Some relevant historic links: Debian bugreport: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961736 glibc bugreport:

[Bug 1903682] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-11-10 07:36 EDT--- (In reply to comment #7) > Ok, I can see that the commit got accepted with 5.10-rc3, hence it will land > in hirsute. > And because the patch was tagged as stable for 5.8, it will land in groovy's > kernel 5.8 (I'll check the

[Bug 1903682] [NEW] [UBUNTU 20.10] NULL pointer dereference when configuring multi-function with devfn != 0 before devfn == 0

2020-11-10 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: Background: When handling multifunction devices in zPCI we take the UID of the PCI function with function number 0 (that always exists according to the PCI spec) as domain number. Therefore when hot plugging functions with function number larger than 0 before function 0, we

[Bug 1903288] [NEW] Power guest secure boot with static keys: kernel portion

2020-11-06 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: == Comment: #2 - Daniel John Axtens - 2020-11-05 20:15:10 == This is the kernel side of changes needed for LPAR/guest secure boot. Because Ubuntu keeps its kernels so wonderfully up to date, I don't think there are any extra patches you need to pick up. (I'll double- check

[Bug 1903289] [NEW] Power guest secure boot with static keys: GRUB2 portion

2020-11-06 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: == Comment: #2 - Daniel John Axtens - 2020-11-05 19:50:03 == This bug covers the grub part of our LPAR Secure Boot design, which I'd like to propose for your 21.04 release. Background == Please find attached an overall outline of the design. Patches ===

[Bug 1903289] Document outlining design of LPAR Secure Boot design

2020-11-06 Thread bugproxy
Default Comment by Bridge ** Attachment added: "Document outlining design of LPAR Secure Boot design" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903289/+attachment/5431869/+files/PowerGuestSecureBootDesign.pdf ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage

[Bug 1902179] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-05 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-05 12:23 EDT--- We were finally able to cobble together a system to perform some testing on the provided Ubuntu test kernel. Here is what was tested (using Debian s390-tools 2.14): - Using zipl to install the bootloader to NVMe works

[Bug 1894942] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-05 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-05 05:44 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released with all requested Distros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1899621] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-05 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-05 05:39 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released with all requested distros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1894942] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-04 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From pa...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-04 13:19 EDT--- (In reply to comment #92) > (In reply to comment #86) > > Thanks, could you please also test Xenial and Bionic? > > I will try to get the Xenial verification done too before the end of day. > I've just verified Xenial. Surprise,

[Bug 1894942] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-04 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From pa...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-04 07:54 EDT--- (In reply to comment #86) > Thanks, could you please also test Xenial and Bionic? I've just verified bionic. The results are pretty much the same as the results with the ppa version I tested before. I will try to get the Xenial

[Bug 1902694] Re: Ubuntu 20.10- Undetected Data corruption in MPI workloads that use VSX for reductions on POWER9 DD2.1 systems

2020-11-03 Thread bugproxy
** Tags removed: severity-medium ** Tags added: severity-high -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902694 Title: Ubuntu 20.10- Undetected Data corruption in MPI workloads that use VSX

[Bug 1902694] mpe.py - test script for vmlinux misalignment

2020-11-03 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment (attachment only) From wa...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-03 13:57 EDT--- ** Attachment added: "mpe.py - test script for vmlinux misalignment" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902694/+attachment/5430774/+files/mpe.py -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1902694] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-03 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From wa...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-03 13:56 EDT--- Hello Patricia, We have this script(mpe.py) which will detect if a vmlinux has the alignment issue or not. We ran it against 16.04, 18.04, 20.04 and 21.04 kernels, and we only found the misalignment in 20.04 and 21.04. 16.04's

[Bug 1902694] [NEW] Ubuntu 20.10- Undetected Data corruption in MPI workloads that use VSX for reductions on POWER9 DD2.1 systems

2020-11-03 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: == Comment: #0 - Waiki Wright - 2020-11-02 17:00:07 == ---Problem Description--- A data integrity issue was observed with the Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.4.0-52 and 20.10 - 5.8.0-26 kernel on Power 9. The root cause is found in the compiling of p9_hmi_special_emu(). When doing a

[Bug 1894942] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-03 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From andre.wi...@ibm.com 2020-11-03 06:04 EDT--- I was also not able to reproduce this with the latest updates from the focal-proposed repository. Both guests I set up had also used the qemu driver. libvirt version: 6.0.0 package: 0ubuntu8.4 qemu version:

[Bug 1839493] Re: [20.10] gnutls28 asm accelerated crypto

2020-11-02 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From gcwil...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-02 16:55 EDT--- This is being worked via a Nettle bounty: https://www.bountysource.com/issues/80107582-ppc64le-aes-and-ghash-vector-acceleration --- Comment From gcwil...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-02 16:57 EDT--- Changing platform to ppc64le

[Bug 1899621] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-02 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-02 07:49 EDT--- Right, but the only relevant line in this file is: "See ./test-suite.log", which must be a separate file. So I wonder if it's saved somewhere alongside stdout/stderr? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1887777] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] Failed to install ubuntu 20.04 on FBA disk on a zvm guest

2020-11-02 Thread bugproxy
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin--- ** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin20041 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188 Title: [UBUNTU 20.04] Failed to install ubuntu 20.04 on FBA

[Bug 1899621] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-02 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-02 06:05 EDT--- Is test-suite.log saved somewhere? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899621 Title: [Ubuntu 20.04] zlib:

[Bug 1902254] Re: Bionic: btrfs: kernel BUG at /build/linux-eTBZpZ/linux-4.15.0/fs/btrfs/ctree.c:3233!

2020-11-02 Thread bugproxy
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-188988 severity-high targetmilestone-inin2004 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902254 Title: Bionic: btrfs: kernel BUG at /build/linux-

[Bug 1902489] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-02 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-02 04:34 EDT--- IBM bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released with all requested distros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1902489] [NEW] [UBUNTU 20.10] s390-cio: Add cond_resched() in the slow_eval_known_fn() loop

2020-11-02 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: Description:s390-cio: Add cond_resched() in the slow_eval_known_fn() loop Symptom:Slow performance during the subchannel scanning Problem:Higher scheduling latencies for tasks during the subchannel scanning event on devices with lots

[Bug 1855679] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From srikar.dronamr...@in.ibm.com 2020-11-02 01:52 EDT--- Harish, Since its not updated for a while now, lets close this bug and reopen this or a new one if we see similar problem again. Since we dont know if this problem still exists or not, I am marking this bug as

[Bug 1855679] sosreport

2020-11-01 Thread bugproxy
Default Comment by Bridge ** Attachment added: "sosreport" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855679/+attachment/5430193/+files/sosreport-lep8d.stressngsoft-20180731003132.tar.xz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1877533] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-10-29 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mihaj...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-29 09:59 EDT--- With 2G, the crashkernel reservation will be 320K, which will not suffice to unlock the LUKS volume when processing kdump. The installation was done using 2G. Changing the VM size to 4+G will reserve 512K, and with this size

[Bug 1860574] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-10-27 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-27 07:48 EDT--- Fix Released with focal, what about bionic ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860574 Title: [UBUNTU

[Bug 1865032] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-10-27 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-27 07:54 EDT--- Fix Released with focal, at least to be integrated into bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1865032

[Bug 1859018] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-10-27 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-27 07:46 EDT--- Fix released by groovy+focal, what about bionic? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859018 Title: [UBUNTU

[Bug 1825343] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-10-27 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-27 06:00 EDT--- Feature request moved to 22.04... --- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-27 06:02 EDT--- Mistake: Changed to 21.04 again... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1896575] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-10-26 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-10-26 11:51 EDT--- The problem persist even with the change in the rsyslog-rotate file root@ilzlnx4:~# date Mon 26 Oct 2020 08:46:50 AM MST root@ilzlnx4:~# logger "Test Error" root@ilzlnx4:~# tail /var/log/syslog Oct 26 03:08:16 ilzlnx4

[Bug 1884514] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-10-26 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-26 08:33 EDT--- We did the zlib part here - but the bugzilla is called "zlib/gzip" - will there be gzip debs? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1901528] [NEW] [Ubuntu 20.10] - When zlib acceleration is enabled, gzip fails when given multiple files larger than 5KB (gzip)

2020-10-26 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: When zlib acceleration is enabled, gzip fails when given multiple files larger than 5KB. This problem does not happen when running gzip against a single file at a time. It only happens when you provide multiple files as gzip arguments. So this works whether zlib

[Bug 1892350] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-10-26 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-26 06:19 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with all requested distros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1893027] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-10-26 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-26 06:20 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with all requested distros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1888231] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-10-26 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-26 06:17 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released with all requested distros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1867118] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-10-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-23 03:29 EDT--- *** Bug 185933 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867118

[Bug 1892350] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-10-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-23 03:27 EDT--- Verified by IBM: Verified that the code is correctly included in s390-tools_2.12.0-0ubuntu3.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1888231] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-10-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-23 03:25 EDT--- Verified by IBM: Verified that the code is correctly included in s390-tools_2.12.0-0ubuntu3.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1867118] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-10-22 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From y...@cn.ibm.com 2020-10-22 21:30 EDT--- Based on this comments, can I say the issue is fixed in Ubuntu20.04? (In reply to comment #29) > The focal part of this ticket is addressed by: > "Focal update: v5.4.69 upstream stable release" >

[Bug 1867118] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-10-22 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From stefan.haberl...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-22 11:52 EDT--- *** Bug 188223 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867118

[Bug 1896575] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-10-22 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-10-22 11:54 EDT--- (In reply to comment #44) > Thanks for all the attachments. This is Rafael from the Ubuntu Server team. > I have gone through all the logs and I could find the I/O errors related to > disk full (/var/log/syslog cannot

[Bug 1896575] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-10-21 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-10-21 16:59 EDT--- (In reply to comment #38) > Hi Mario, would you also be so kind to provide us with a "sos report" and > the "dbginfo.sh" output? > This should help to shed some more light into this ... > > Hi Mario, would you also be

[Bug 1896575] sosreport_FCP

2020-10-21 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-10-21 16:47 EDT--- ** Attachment added: "sosreport_FCP" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896575/+attachment/5425219/+files/sosreport-ilzlnx3-188206-2020-10-21-rilivdt.tar.xz -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1896575] dbginfo_FCP

2020-10-21 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-10-21 15:00 EDT--- ** Attachment added: "dbginfo_FCP" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896575/+attachment/5425200/+files/DBGINFO-2020-10-21-11-52-07-ilzlnx3-23BBB8.tgz -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1896575] dbginfo_iSCSI

2020-10-21 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-10-21 14:53 EDT--- ** Attachment added: "dbginfo_iSCSI" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896575/+attachment/5425199/+files/DBGINFO-2020-10-21-11-48-12-ilzlnx4-26BBB8.tgz -- You received this bug notification

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >