[Bug 1942633] Re: Can not boot impish in Cavium ThunderX

2021-09-23 Thread dann frazier
A patch has been merged into the arm64 tree and is tagged for stable 5.13+ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942633 Title: Can not boot impish in Cavium ThunderX To manage

[Bug 1942633] Re: Can not boot impish in Cavium ThunderX

2021-09-22 Thread dann frazier
Patch submitted: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg922152.html ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942633

[Bug 1942633] Re: Can not boot impish in Cavium ThunderX

2021-09-21 Thread dann frazier
Root caused and reported upstream: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg921821.html ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. ht

[Bug 1935855] Re: dbgsym contains no debug symbols

2021-09-21 Thread dann frazier
= verification = root@dannf-lp1935855:~# wget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/linux-image-4.15.0-1100-kvm-dbgsym_4.15.0-1100.102_amd64.ddeb --2021-09-21 17:13:41--

[Bug 1942633] Re: Can not boot impish in Cavium ThunderX

2021-09-21 Thread dann frazier
Update: The issue does not follow toolchain, which is good. Rather I did find that upstream v5.13-rc1 is stable - with the patch in comment #15 reverted - while upstream v5.13 is not. I bisected v5.13-rc1..v5.13, reverting the comment #15 patch at each test. A "bad" kernel wouldn't always fail the

[Bug 1942633] Re: Can not boot impish in Cavium ThunderX

2021-09-17 Thread dann frazier
hm.. you're right. I was tracking down a different issue which had the following backtrace: [ 10.701967] Call trace: [ 10.704415] ata_host_activate+0x160/0x170 [ 10.708518] ahci_host_activate+0x170/0x1e0 [ 10.712711] ahci_init_one+0x898/0xd74 [ahci] [ 10.717116]

[Bug 1939413] Re: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libprotobuf.a’ generated with LTO version 9.2 instead of the expected 11.0

2021-09-17 Thread dann frazier
It would be interesting to know if the issue is due to the differences in the toolchain used to build elfutils 0.183-6 and 0.183-8. The build logs show they were 10.2.1-23ubuntu2 and 11.2.0-1ubuntu2, respectively. If we built 2 copies of 0.183-8 in the same environment, but just varied the

[Bug 1942633] Re: Can not boot impish in Cavium ThunderX

2021-09-15 Thread dann frazier
First bad commit: commit 9ec37efb87832b578d7972fc80b04d94f5d2bbe3 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad) Author: Marc Zyngier Date: Tue Mar 30 16:11:42 2021 +0100 PCI/MSI: Make pci_host_common_probe() declare its reliance on MSI domains The generic PCI host driver relies on MSI domains for MSIs

[Bug 1942633] Re: Can not boot impish in Cavium ThunderX

2021-09-13 Thread dann frazier
For the CRB1S systems, the following is the firmware string that matters, and it shows that phanpy is running the latest (and very likely final) version: BIOS Date: 06/14/2018 14:42:48 Ver: 0ACGA022 Note that this is also reproducible on our Gigabyte R120 systems which use acpi=force by default,

[Bug 1939413] Re: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libprotobuf.a’ generated with LTO version 9.2 instead of the expected 11.0

2021-09-10 Thread dann frazier
The rebuild of protobuf no longer has lto information according to objdump, but the reported version certainly does. The "bad" version was built during hirsute devel, so I took a current hirsute system and systematically downgraded build-deps to the versions in the log of the "bad" build. Turns

[Bug 1942633] Re: Can not boot impish in Cavium ThunderX

2021-09-10 Thread dann frazier
I can attempt a bisect - let me know if someone else is already doing that :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942633 Title: Can not boot impish in Cavium ThunderX To manage

[Bug 1858590] Re: fwupdaa64.efi crashes on startup

2021-08-31 Thread dann frazier
= Verification of 1.2.14-0~18.04.2 = Shell> fs0: FS0:\> cd efi FS0:\efi\> fwupdaa64.efi WARNING: No updates to process. Called in error? FS0:\efi\> ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic -- You received

[Bug 1923104] Re: Include Infiniband Peer Memory interface

2021-08-30 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) -- You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 1941927] Re: Update libpmix-dev on Ubuntu 21.10

2021-08-28 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: pmix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941927 Title: Update libpmix-dev on Ubuntu 21.10 To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1941649] [NEW] switch to zstd by default breaks booting focal LTS kernel

2021-08-25 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: While trying to track down a behavior difference between focal and impish, I installed focal's kernel in an impish userspace and attempted to boot it. The boot failed, unable to find root. While GRUB reported that it had loaded the initramfs, no initramfs messages were

[Bug 1858590] Re: fwupdaa64.efi crashes on startup

2021-08-25 Thread dann frazier
Verified 1.2.14-0~18.04.1: FS2:\> fwupdaa64.efi WARNING: No updates to process. Called in error? ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1940860] Re: Mellanox NIC interface names change between 5.4 and 5.8

2021-08-24 Thread dann frazier
@ddstreet I agree that systemd is behaving as designed. But I'm not sure what the proper fix for this is, and therefore where changes would be required. My initial thought is that perhaps subiquity installs should do what MAAS installs do and configure netplan to always use the install-time

[Bug 1940860] [NEW] Mellanox NIC interface names change between 5.4 and 5.8

2021-08-23 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: I noticed on a couple of systems that my network interface names change when upgrading from the focal LTS (5.4) kernel to the focal HWE (both 5.8 & 5.11) kernels. Both systems have Mellanox Connect-X 5 NICs. dannf@bizzy:~$ uname -a Linux bizzy 5.4.0-81-generic #91-Ubuntu SMP

[Bug 1931728] Re: [scalingstack bos01] bionic (arm64) instances always fail to boot on eMAGs in this cloud

2021-08-16 Thread dann frazier
Upstream has been working with me to try to determine what is going on here. The conclusion is that we believe that firmware is piggy-backing on the ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND calls, and is clobbering some of the registers in the x4-x17 range. The patch series mentioned in Comment #9 happens to

[Bug 1940142] [NEW] `debian/rules clean` leaves stale debian/linux-libc-dev

2021-08-16 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: When building with a non-primary variant - such as the unstable tree[*], do_libc_dev gets set to false: debian/rules.d/0-common-vars.mk # linux-libc-dev may not be needed, default to building it only for the # primary variant

[Bug 1923268] Re: grubnet default grub.cfg should try /grub/grub.cfg-${net_default_mac} before /grub/grub.cfg

2021-08-13 Thread dann frazier
Good news everybody! False alarm - it seems to be working w/ 2.9.3-beta1 after waiting a bit. I was certain I had waited for images to sync before testing (according to the UI), so not sure what was needed to lock it in, but it does seem to be good. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1923268] Re: grubnet default grub.cfg should try /grub/grub.cfg-${net_default_mac} before /grub/grub.cfg

2021-08-13 Thread dann frazier
hm.. I don't have perms to reopen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923268 Title: grubnet default grub.cfg should try /grub/grub.cfg-${net_default_mac} before /grub/grub.cfg To

[Bug 1923268] Re: grubnet default grub.cfg should try /grub/grub.cfg-${net_default_mac} before /grub/grub.cfg

2021-08-13 Thread dann frazier
I upgraded to 2.9.3~beta1 (9197-g.afe92bb63), which appears to have the fix integrated, but I'm still seeing the same issue. That is, if I PXE boot an unknown arm64 machine, it is given an arm64 GRUB configured to boot amd64 files. I'm therefore reopening. -- You received this bug notification

Re: [Bug 1939379] Re: ARM kernel builds fail with GCC 11

2021-08-13 Thread dann frazier
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 7:35 AM Juerg Haefliger <1939...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > > I wonder if this is related but cpio on impish arm64 seems broken. I wouldn't think so - this change should only impact armhf. -dann -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1939379] Re: ARM kernel builds fail with GCC 11

2021-08-12 Thread dann frazier
Interesting - here's what I see in the boost1.74 log: "g++" -x assembler-with-cpp -fPIC -pthread -O3 -finline-functions -Wno-inline -Wall -g -fvisibility=hidden -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -DBOOST_CONTEXT_DYN_LINK=1 -DBOOST_CONTEXT_SOURCE -DBOOST_DISABLE_ASSERTS

[Bug 1935855] Re: dbgsym contains no debug symbols

2021-08-11 Thread dann frazier
** Description changed: - linux-image-unsigned-5.4.0-77-generic-dbgsym provides a - /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-5.4.0-1040-kvm, but it does not contain any - debug symbols. Compare: + [Impact] + linux-image-unsigned-5.4.0-77-generic-dbgsym provides a /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-5.4.0-1040-kvm,

[Bug 1935855] Re: dbgsym contains no debug symbols

2021-08-11 Thread dann frazier
nassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1935855 Title: dbgsym contains no debug symbols To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpa

[Bug 1939379] Re: ARM kernel builds fail with GCC 11

2021-08-11 Thread dann frazier
Yeah, I think what's going on is that - due to the above change - gcc-11 no longer enables an FPU independently of the selected arch. The FPU is only enabled because the default -march is armv7-a+fp. The kernel build is overriding GCC's (new) built-in default march to one that does not have "+fp",

[Bug 1935855] Re: dbgsym contains no debug symbols

2021-08-11 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: linux-kvm (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-kvm (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-kvm (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug

[Bug 1939379] Re: ARM kernel builds fail with GCC 11

2021-08-10 Thread dann frazier
I wonder if this is due to: gcc-11 (11.1.0-2) experimental; urgency=medium [...] * For armhf configure --with-arch=+fp, dropping the --with-fpu= option. [...] FWIW, I'm seeing something similar w/ edk2. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1932117] Re: Lots of hisi_qm zombie task slow down system after stress test

2021-08-04 Thread dann frazier
This patch fixes the problem: From 57ca81245f4db4a0222d545f8f5d4709544c26cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shukun Tan Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 10:06:21 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] crypto: hisilicon - Use one workqueue per qm instead of per qp Since SEC need not so many workqueues as our test, we just

[Bug 1932117] Re: Lots of hisi_qm zombie task slow down system after stress test

2021-08-04 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance:

[Bug 1918427] Re: curtin: install flash-kernel in arm64 UEFI unexpected

2021-08-04 Thread dann frazier
= focal kernel verification = ubuntu@aurorus:~$ apt show linux-image-5.4.0-81-generic | grep Recommends WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in scripts. Recommends: flash-kernel | grub-efi-arm64, initramfs-tools | linux-initramfs-tool ubuntu@aurorus:~$ apt show

[Bug 1935880] Re: lxc c2-m2 focal VM causes KVM internal error during PCI init

2021-07-29 Thread dann frazier
I got back to this a couple days ago, here's what I've learned. I tried decoding the QEMU syndrome - but be warned, I've never done this before. I believe what it is reporting is an EPT[*] misconfiguration. I noticed that the 5.4 -generic kernel does not reproduce the issue, while the -kvm one

[Bug 1845048] Re: Improve sysctl handling on kdump-tools

2021-07-23 Thread dann frazier
Correction: looks like it was 1:1.6.7-4. git-debrebase confused me. ** Changed in: makedumpfile (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1845048] Re: Improve sysctl handling on kdump-tools

2021-07-23 Thread dann frazier
Guillherme's MR was merged in 1.6.8-1, so marking Fix Released. ** Changed in: kdump-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: makedumpfile (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1936831] Re: libvirt ACPI on unsupported machine

2021-07-23 Thread dann frazier
@Enoch: Thanks for clarifying your use case, it's clear that launching an accelerated raspi3b VM is your goal - apologies I couldn't be of more help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1936831] Re: libvirt ACPI on unsupported machine

2021-07-22 Thread dann frazier
Hi Enoch, Christian asked me to take a peek at this but, unfortunately, what you're trying to do here is outside of my wheelhouse. Generally when I'm running KVM ARM guests, I just use the "virt" model regardless of what the underlying kit is. The virt model provides a standard UEFI/KVM system

Re: [Bug 1936857] Re: grub-install: error: efibootmgr: not found.

2021-07-20 Thread dann frazier
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 07:07:55PM -, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > in later releases grub-install has stopped forking to call efibootmgr in > favor of using an EFI library. > > Does it return non-zero error code? because it should be ignoring > failure to call efibootmgr. And otherwise grub

[Bug 1928010] Re: Occasionally crashes in _relocate() on arm64

2021-07-20 Thread dann frazier
= bionic verification = I verified that shim*-signed* version 1.37~18.04.10+15.4-0ubuntu7 reboots fine. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1933402] Re: net card set VF and altname display blurred character

2021-07-20 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: kunpeng920/ubuntu-20.04-hwe Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: kunpeng920 Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1928010] Re: Occasionally crashes in _relocate() on arm64

2021-07-19 Thread dann frazier
Oh, I see that the shim packages - both amd64 and arm64 - appear to no longer contain binaries. The thing I tested successfully in Comment #11 was shim-signed, which does. I'm not sure if this change to shim is intentional or not (I don't see anything obvious in the changelog), so I'll go ahead

[Bug 1936857] Re: grub-install: error: efibootmgr: not found.

2021-07-19 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: grub2 (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1928010] Re: Occasionally crashes in _relocate() on arm64

2021-07-19 Thread dann frazier
= focal verification = shim-signed 1.40.6+15.4-0ubuntu7 has survived > 60 reboots -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928010 Title: Occasionally crashes in _relocate() on arm64 To

[Bug 1928010] Re: Occasionally crashes in _relocate() on arm64

2021-07-19 Thread dann frazier
The arm64/shim package in xenial-proposed (15.4-0ubuntu7) seems to be lacking content, so I'll mark that verification failed: ubuntu@xenial:~$ dpkg -L shim /. /usr /usr/lib /usr/lib/shim /usr/lib/shim/BOOTAA64.CSV /usr/lib/shim/fbaa64.efi /usr/lib/shim/mmaa64.efi /usr/lib/shim/shimaa64.efi

[Bug 1936857] [NEW] grub-install: error: efibootmgr: not found.

2021-07-19 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: grub-install from 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.32 on xenial/arm64 fails with: ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo grub-install Installing for arm64-efi platform. grub-install: error: efibootmgr: not found. ** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects:

[Bug 1931728] Re: [scalingstack bos01] bionic (arm64) instances always fail to boot on eMAGs in this cloud

2021-07-19 Thread dann frazier
Note that bare metal boots also fail the same way w/ the MDS workaround enabled (failing VM boots all had a newer kernel running on the host): EFI stub: Booting Linux Kernel... EFI stub: EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL unavailable, no randomness supplied EFI stub: Using DTB from configuration table EFI stub:

[Bug 1928010] Re: Occasionally crashes in _relocate() on arm64

2021-07-16 Thread dann frazier
= Verification = Survivied 368 reboots so far, so I think we're good :) shim-signed 1.50+15.4-0ubuntu7 ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal verification-needed-hirsute ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal verification-done-hirsute -- You received

[Bug 1935880] Re: lxc c2-m2 focal VM causes KVM internal error during PCI init

2021-07-12 Thread dann frazier
I filed this issue on the kernel because it initially appeared to follow the host kernel version. While it's very reproducible w/ v5.4, I wasn't able to reproduce it with v5.8 or v5.7. However, I've now found that was a false negative - it is still reproducible with v5.13, so the kernel may not be

[Bug 1935880] Re: lxc c2-m2 focal VM causes KVM internal error during PCI init

2021-07-12 Thread dann frazier
I attached gdb to the VM[*] and retrieved the following backtrace from the guest kernel: (gdb) bt full #0 pci_conf1_read (seg=, bus=, devfn=, reg=16, len=4, value=0xc901fa0c) at /home/dannf/linux-kvm-5.4.0/arch/x86/pci/direct.c:35 flags = 582 __dummy = __dummy2

[Bug 1935880] [NEW] lxc c2-m2 focal VM causes KVM internal error during PCI init

2021-07-12 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: Launching a 2 CPU 2G VM with lxc often cause a KVM internal error during boot. Reproducer: lxc launch ubuntu:20.04 dannf-test2 -t c2-m2 --vm QEMU will report a KVM internal error: KVM internal error. Suberror: 3 extra data[0]: 80ec extra data[1]: 31 extra data[2]: 81

[Bug 1935855] [NEW] dbgsym contains no debug symbols

2021-07-12 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: linux-image-unsigned-5.4.0-77-generic-dbgsym provides a /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-5.4.0-1040-kvm, but it does not contain any debug symbols. Compare: $ file /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-* /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-5.4.0-1040-kvm: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64,

[Bug 1934192] Re: regression between 2.04-1ubuntu44 and 2.04-1ubuntu44.2 breaks netboot on arm64

2021-07-09 Thread dann frazier
After switching to the Mellanox NIC, I'm no longer seeing any issues. I therefore suspect the issue is with the Intel UEFI driver - or some other firmware - and not with the bootloader. ** Changed in: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1933402] Re: net card set VF and altname display blurred character

2021-07-09 Thread dann frazier
= Verification = Before: 14: enp1s0f0np0v0: mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000 link/ether 92:aa:d8:f1:ae:10 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff altname `�lժ� altname ��lժ� After: 15: enp1s0f0np0v0: mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000 link/ether

[Bug 1935583] Re: Kernel panic on Bionic 5.4.0-47-generic

2021-07-09 Thread dann frazier
The log shows that you are running non-Ubuntu mlx5 modules, and the traceback is in those modules. Marking Invalid - you'll need to reach out to your mlx5 driver provider for support. ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: kunpeng920

[Bug 1926985] Re: linux-version sort: argv and stdin behaviors differ

2021-07-08 Thread dann frazier
= Verification = $ cat versions.txt 5.8.0-50-generic 5.8.0-50-generic-64k $ for dist in hirsute groovy focal bionic; do lxc exec dannf-lp1926985-${dist} -- dpkg-query --showformat='${Version}\n' --show linux-base; lxc exec dannf-lp1926985-${dist} -- linux-version sort < versions.txt; done

[Bug 1885491] Re: firefor crashes ubuntu command terminal crashes

2021-07-08 Thread dann frazier
Hi Sangam, Unfortunately there is not enough information here for a developer to diagnose the issue(s). If you are still seeing issues, can you follow the steps described here to report a crash in the firefox package, and additional issues for any other packages that may be crashing?

[Bug 1931886] Re: show-regs can cause some samsung controllers to go offline

2021-07-08 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: nvme-cli (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931886 Title: show-regs can cause some samsung controllers to go

[Bug 1736425] Re: crash: cannot resolve "init_level4_pgt

2021-07-08 Thread dann frazier
7.2.9 is in impish, so marking Fix Released ** Changed in: crash (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1736425 Title: crash: cannot

[Bug 1919275] Re: crash utility fails on arm64 with cannot determine VA_BITS_ACTUAL

2021-07-08 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: crash (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1919275 Title:

[Bug 1706946] Re: Sync crash 7.1.9-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2021-07-08 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: crash (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1706946 Title: Sync crash 7.1.9-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To

[Bug 1931886] Re: show-regs can cause some samsung controllers to go offline

2021-07-07 Thread dann frazier
Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) ** Changed in: nvme-cli (Ubuntu Hirsute) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931886 Title:

[Bug 1926985] Re: linux-version sort: argv and stdin behaviors differ

2021-07-07 Thread dann frazier
** Description changed: [Impact] - Systems that use flash-kernel may end up installing the wrong kernel image. - - `linux-version sort` can provide different answers depending on how it - is called (see Test Case). The stdin behavior appears to be a bug, and - this is the mode flash-kernel

[Bug 1934192] Re: regression between 2.04-1ubuntu44 and 2.04-1ubuntu44.2 breaks netboot on arm64

2021-07-07 Thread dann frazier
One hypothesis is that the network stack/UEFI driver dies after loading the initial GRUB image. To test that, I started a ping at the server until it dropped to the GRUB prompt. Now, I never saw a single ping response - even while the server was successfully TFTP'ing GRUB from MAAS. Maybe it just

[Bug 1934192] Re: regression between 2.04-1ubuntu44 and 2.04-1ubuntu44.2 breaks netboot on arm64

2021-07-07 Thread dann frazier
I bisected binutils and found the significant change that avoids the problem to be: commit d1bcae833b32f1408485ce69f844dcd7ded093a8 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad) Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu Jan 7 06:42:00 2021 -0800 ELF: Don't generate unused section symbols Now, this doesn't appear to be a bug

[Bug 1931886] Re: show-regs can cause some samsung controllers to go offline

2021-07-07 Thread dann frazier
This is fixed in the 1.14 upstream release which I've now sync'd from Debian experimental. ** Changed in: nvme-cli (Ubuntu Impish) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1931886] Re: show-regs can cause some samsung controllers to go offline

2021-07-06 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: nvme-cli (Ubuntu Impish) Status: In Progress => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931886 Title: show-regs can cause some samsung controllers to go offline

[Bug 1934192] Re: regression between 2.04-1ubuntu44 and 2.04-1ubuntu44.2 breaks netboot on arm64

2021-07-02 Thread dann frazier
binutils 2.35.50.20210106-1ubuntu2 = BAD binutils 2.35.90.20210120-1ubuntu1 = GOOD So possibly a change between 2.35.50 and 2.35.90 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934192 Title:

[Bug 1934192] Re: regression between 2.04-1ubuntu44 and 2.04-1ubuntu44.2 breaks netboot on arm64

2021-07-01 Thread dann frazier
Rebuilding in focal, but with hirsute's binutils makes the issue go away. Now to dig into binutils changes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934192 Title: regression between

[Bug 1862378] Re: libsystemd-shared broken in Multi-Arch

2021-07-01 Thread dann frazier
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #990547 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990547 ** Also affects: systemd (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990547 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1862378] Re: libsystemd-shared broken in Multi-Arch

2021-07-01 Thread dann frazier
Yes, it still exists as of systemd 248.3-1ubuntu1: ubuntu@howzit:~$ sudo dpkg --add-architecture armhf ubuntu@howzit:~$ sudo apt update > /dev/null 2>&1 ubuntu@howzit:~$ sudo apt install systemd:armhf systemd-container:arm64 [...] Setting up systemd:armhf (248.3-1ubuntu1) ... Setting up

[Bug 1934192] Re: regression between 2.04-1ubuntu44 and 2.04-1ubuntu44.2 breaks netboot on arm64

2021-07-01 Thread dann frazier
Another datapoint - the system that sees this issue is a Gigabyte G242-P30-JG. But I can not reproduce on an Ampere Mt. Jade system. Both use the Ampere Altra SoC. Gigabyte firmware: F07 03/22/2021 14:48:30 Mt. Jade firmware: 2021/05/26 17:35:33 Ver: 0ACOI 1.6.20210526 -- You received this bug

[Bug 1934192] Re: regression between 2.04-1ubuntu44 and 2.04-1ubuntu44.2 breaks netboot on arm64

2021-07-01 Thread dann frazier
@juliank pointed out that 2.04-1ubuntu44 was built w/ the hirsute toolchain, 2.04-1ubuntu44.2 with focal's toolchain. I'll run some experiments to see if the issue follows the toolchain. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1934192] Re: regression between 2.04-1ubuntu44 and 2.04-1ubuntu44.2 breaks netboot on arm64

2021-06-30 Thread dann frazier
Turns out the *unsigned* 2.04-1ubuntu44.2 binary boots fine - the issue only seems to occur w/ the signed one. I also tried the 2.04ubuntu44.2 grubnetaa64.efi.signed from -updates, which has a different checksum (different sig?), and the failure also occurs there. To be clear, this system does not

[Bug 1934192] [NEW] regression between 2.04-1ubuntu44 and 2.04-1ubuntu44.2 breaks netboot on arm64

2021-06-30 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: We noticed today that 2 arm64 nodes in our MAAS server are failing to Commission/Deploy. Both happen to be Ampere Altra systems. We have not (yet) noticed a problem with other systems - a Cavium ThunderX system I tested seems unaffected. The symptom is that they

[Bug 1928010] Re: Occasionally crashes in _relocate() on arm64

2021-06-30 Thread dann frazier
s/successfully/successfully reboot/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928010 Title: Occasionally crashes in _relocate() on arm64 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1928010] Re: Occasionally crashes in _relocate() on arm64

2021-06-30 Thread dann frazier
Yeah, but doesn't hurt to verify the official build either. I've put 16 VMs in reboot loops w/ the updated shim and they've cumulatively successfully approximately 1000 times - so I think we're good :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1918427] Re: curtin: install flash-kernel in arm64 UEFI unexpected

2021-06-29 Thread dann frazier
. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 1908452] Re: MAAS stops working and deployment fails after `Loading ephemeral` step

2021-06-29 Thread dann frazier
= focal verification = # Start by showing we can still reproduce the problem w/o the -proposed packages: ubuntu@dannf-test:~$ sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s 91.189.88.136 -m string --string maas.io --algo bm -j DROP ubuntu@dannf-test:~$ cat > repro.py #!/usr/bin/env python3 from

[Bug 1908452] Re: MAAS stops working and deployment fails after `Loading ephemeral` step

2021-06-29 Thread dann frazier
Restoring verification-needed-focal tag; bdmurray correctly points out my focal verification was actually done on groovy :( ** Tags removed: verification-done verification-done-focal ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1918427] Re: curtin: install flash-kernel in arm64 UEFI unexpected

2021-06-29 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: curtin (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: curtin (Ubuntu Hirsute)

[Bug 1933402] Re: net card set VF and altname display blurred character

2021-06-29 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: kunpeng920 Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: kunpeng920/ubuntu-20.04-hwe Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: kunpeng920/ubuntu-20.04-hwe Milestone: None => ubuntu-20.04.3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1926985] Re: linux-version sort: argv and stdin behaviors differ

2021-06-29 Thread dann frazier
** Description changed: [Impact] Systems that use flash-kernel may end up installing the wrong kernel image. `linux-version sort` can provide different answers depending on how it is called (see Test Case). The stdin behavior appears to be a bug, and this is the mode flash-kernel

[Bug 1926985] Re: linux-version sort: argv and stdin behaviors differ

2021-06-29 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => In

Re: [Bug 1933402] Re: net card set VF and altname display blurred character

2021-06-29 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:28:00PM -, Dan Streetman wrote: > systemd doesn't use iproute2 tooling to set the altnames, it sets them > directly with netlink. You're right. The problem is that it does so w/ possibly uninitialized memory. I added the following patch to demonstrate: ---

[Bug 1933402] Re: net card set VF and altname display blurred character

2021-06-28 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933402 Title: net card set VF and altname display blurred

[Bug 1933402] Re: net card set VF and altname display blurred character

2021-06-28 Thread dann frazier
** Description changed: [Impact] - When running with the HWE kernel (5.4 didn't support altnames), altnames containing garbage (uninitialized memory) may get assigned to a NIC. This is 100% reproducible on arm64. + When running with the HWE kernel (5.4 didn't support altnames), altnames

[Bug 1933402] Re: net card set VF and altname display blurred character

2021-06-28 Thread dann frazier
ility] - 100% - - [Additional information] - (Firmware version, kernel version, affected hardware, etc. if required): - - [Resolution] + [What Could Go Wrong] + TBD ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned)

[Bug 1933402] Re: net card set VF and altname display blurred character

2021-06-28 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Impish)

[Bug 1933402] Re: net card set VF and altname display blurred character

2021-06-28 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933402 Title: net card set VF and altname display blurred character

[Bug 1766728] Re: update linux-base on xenial and earlier

2021-06-28 Thread dann frazier
Marking the devel release fixed as well, since backport versions are by definition already fixed there. ** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926985] Re: linux-version sort: argv and stdin behaviors differ

2021-06-28 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu Hirsute) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) ** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) ** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu Groovy) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) *

[Bug 1931136] Re: Don't unhook ExitBootServices() when EBS protection is disabled

2021-06-28 Thread dann frazier
As with xenial (see Comment #11), my focal verification just shows that booting under SB still works: ubuntu@dannf-shim-f:~$ dpkg-query -W shim-signed shim-signed 1.40.5+15.4-0ubuntu5 ubuntu@dannf-shim-f:~$ sudo mokutil --sb-state SecureBoot enabled ** Tags removed:

[Bug 1931728] Re: [scalingstack bos01] bionic (arm64) instances always fail to boot on eMAGs in this cloud

2021-06-25 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931728 Title: [scalingstack bos01] bionic (arm64) instances always fail to boot on eMAGs

[Bug 1931136] Re: Don't unhook ExitBootServices() when EBS protection is disabled

2021-06-25 Thread dann frazier
I'm not sure we've seen this problem with a xenial guest. However, I did regression test and verify that xenial guests still boot in secureboot mode w/ the shim-signed package in -proposed: ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ dpkg -l | grep shim-signed ii shim-signed

[Bug 1931136] Re: Don't unhook ExitBootServices() when EBS protection is disabled

2021-06-24 Thread dann frazier
I was able to reproduce this w/o any chainloading. Just booting a hirsute image in QEMU w/ SecureBoot enabled was enough. I verified that I'm still seeing this issue w/ the current hirsute cloud image: BdsDxe: loading Boot0001 "UEFI Misc Device" from PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x1,0x2)/Pci(0x0,0x0)

[Bug 1931136] Re: Don't unhook ExitBootServices() when EBS protection is disabled

2021-06-24 Thread dann frazier
>From inside the properly booting hirsute instance mentioned in the prior comment: ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -c Codename: hirsute ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo mokutil --sb-state SecureBoot enabled ** Tags removed: verification-needed-hirsute ** Tags added: verification-done-hirsute -- You

[Bug 1931728] Re: [scalingstack bos01] bionic (arm64) instances always fail to boot on eMAGs in this cloud

2021-06-24 Thread dann frazier
The changeset referenced in Comment #8 was part of a 21-part changeset shown here: https://patches.linaro.org/cover/141739/ I was able to backport these changes to our 4.15 kernel and get it booting w/ the MDS workaround enabled. One option is to SRU those (and a number of follow-up Fixes:

[Bug 1931728] Re: [scalingstack bos01] bionic (arm64) instances always fail to boot on eMAGs in this cloud

2021-06-24 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931728 Title:

[Bug 1931728] Re: [scalingstack bos01] bionic (arm64) instances always fail to boot on eMAGs in this cloud

2021-06-23 Thread dann frazier
I found that booting an upstream 4.18 kernel in the guest trips this problem, while an upstream 5.4 does not. I bisected and found that this commit seems to be the relevant change: commit 3b7142752e4bee153df6db4a76ca104ef0d7c0b4 (refs/bisect/bad) Author: Mark Rutland Date: Wed Jul 11 14:56:45

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >