I have quite a few servers deployed with hardy and a manually compiled driver
to work around this problem.
I am just about to purchase an Asus ts300-e6/ps4 which has this chipset in it.
During the build phase of the project it is for, we can add in some delay and
make it available for testing
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Confirmed
** Changed in: linux
Status: Invalid = Confirmed
--
Heron LTS 8.04.3 and 20100126's 8.04.4 don't support Intel 82574L NICs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513292
You received this bug notification because you are a
This is not invalid, and not true, more recent kernel releases have not just
contained security releases. There are a number of good reasons to stay on
hardy, and not get forced to lucid.
Can we please provide a backported driver into the next hardy kernel release? I
am sure there will be one,
Dustin Kirkland wrote:
Beyond that, code-wise, perhaps we could emit a warning in the
grub-install postinst, that detects if /boot is on a RAID, and
recommend that the user investigate the situation and perhaps run
grub-install on the device. Steve mentioned update-notifier, which
might be
Having similar problems here. Deleting .kde directory did not fix it. Latest
intrepid as of today.
However, I found that when I did a suspend to disk operation from the shutdown
menu, the suspend failed, but the wifi light came on on my laptop and
kdenetwork manager was able to connect straight
The machine is question works fine for dapper - the sunfire x4100 I
think. The driver was included in the dapper kernel in the very last
release before the final release. This was ages ago and while the
controller doesn't work if you put it in mirrored mode, in JBOD mode
with software raid was
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.24
Hi,
I am trying to run the areca cli tool from areca with my areca 1210 card on
hardy.
I am using 2.6.24-4-server which I realise is not the latest hardy kernel, but
I just wanted to make sure a patch was included eventually in the
Yeah I am still using the machines in question for pretty heavy I/O load
(they are dedicated storage servers for an OpenVZ cluster). They are
running RAID5 from the card. Can't remember the specs on it, if I could
run the CLI tool I would tell you. But its a definite regression in that
if the CLI
