[Bug 617885] Re: gparted crash at start: glibmm-ERROR **

2010-11-24 Thread jayseye
just a link to a specific doc would do. Thanks, jayseye -- gparted crash at start: glibmm-ERROR ** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/617885 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 617885] Re: gparted crash at start: glibmm-ERROR **

2010-11-24 Thread jayseye
to request a backport? Thanks again, jayseye From gparted-0.7.0-notes.txt: http://sourceforge.net/projects/gparted/files/gparted/gparted-0.7.0/gparted-0.7.0-notes.txt/download GPARTED 0.7.0 RELEASE NOTES This release of GParted adds initial support for the btrfs

[Bug 617885] Re: gparted crash at start: glibmm-ERROR **

2010-11-21 Thread jayseye
the USB version. Planning to report this to the GParted project when I can assemble a complete bug report. Just mentioning it here re Comment #62. Regards, jayseye -- gparted crash at start: glibmm-ERROR ** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/617885 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 617885] Re: gparted crash at start: glibmm-ERROR **

2010-11-15 Thread jayseye
and showing up in Synaptic. I'd be willing to contribute some time / effort if there's anything I could do to expedite that. Any useful advice on how to proceed? Regards, jayseye -- gparted crash at start: glibmm-ERROR ** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/617885 You received this bug notification

[Bug 617885] Re: gparted crash at start: glibmm-ERROR **

2010-11-07 Thread jayseye
save the work of building from source. Regards, jayseye -- gparted crash at start: glibmm-ERROR ** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/617885 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 617885] Re: gparted crash at start: glibmm-ERROR **

2010-10-29 Thread jayseye
How long does it typically take for a new upstream version to be packaged for Ubuntu? Having the same problem on PowerPC under Maverick, and may build from source if there will be more than a few days of lag time. Thanks to all who have helped trace and fix this issue! Regards, jaysye

[Bug 586385] Re: linux-ports-meta not kept up to date

2010-08-29 Thread jayseye
** Tags added: kernel lucid packaging -- linux-ports-meta not kept up to date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586385 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 586385] Re: linux-ports-meta not kept up to date

2010-08-28 Thread jayseye
Security Issue: Ubuntu update manager now reports that linux-image-2.6.32-24-powerpc 2.6.32-24.41 is available as a security update; but that package's Description warns: You likely do not want to install this package directly. Instead, install the linux-powerpc meta-package, which will

[Bug 66835] Re: Power Management Status icon displays incorrectly for Tripp Lite UPS

2008-04-01 Thread jayseye
What additional information is required to change this bug's status from 'Incomplete' and get the issue fixed? Same problem here under Gutsy on a Pentium 4. -- Power Management Status icon displays incorrectly for Tripp Lite UPS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66835 You received this bug

[Bug 176149] Manual Workaround Re: GnomeBaker error for Import Session

2007-12-19 Thread jayseye
One of the Gnomebaker developers (Pygi) has replied to my posting #15 on this thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=159835 and we have been following up on this. In particular, I reported a workaround of manually editing a field to enter a mount point which the program fails to

[Bug 176149] GnomeBaker error for Import Session

2007-12-13 Thread jayseye
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnomebaker GnomeBaker 0.6.2 under Ubuntu 7.10 (Gutsy Gibbon) fails to import a session which it has previously created. A dialog box reports Error getting information / unknown error. This is a different symptom than reported for Bug #71684. The

[Bug 176149] Brasero works

2007-12-13 Thread jayseye
Brasero was able to import the session, and to burn a subsequent session. This is another difference from Bug #71684 where a comment claimed that it was a backend problem. Also, the workaround mentioned for that previous bug fails to help in this case. -- GnomeBaker error for Import Session