[Bug 1536915] Re: Continue button grayed out in 2 steps of install
Exclusive to a Thinkpad x200 machine. Same results using dd and unetbootin to load the image onto a USB-drive. Same USB-drive works on an Asus eee 1215n. Ubuntu also affected. Drops straight to desktop on both, no choice between install and run. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536915 Title: Continue button grayed out in 2 steps of install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1536915/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 296867] Re: empathy needs to support OTR encryption
Just because the conversation is encrypted end to end doesnt mean you cant log locally. Dont know how empathy does this, but in pidgin it can be set up easily. There is even an option to omiss the conversations that are encrypted. I dont really like that distinction, because it implies all encrypted communication is sensitive. Rather its best to moreso always encrypt so that you dont draw attention to something by said connection. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296867 Title: empathy needs to support OTR encryption To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/empathy/+bug/296867/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1232532] Re: package libgnutls26 2.12.14-5ubuntu3.4 [modified: usr/share/doc/libgnutls26/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: libgnutls26:amd64 2.12.14-5ubuntu3.4 cannot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 979818 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979818 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 979818 package libgnutls26 2.12.14-5ubuntu3 [modified: usr/share/doc/libgnutls26/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: libgnutls26:amd64 2.12.14-5ubuntu3 cannot be configured because libgnutls26 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232532 Title: package libgnutls26 2.12.14-5ubuntu3.4 [modified: usr/share/doc/libgnutls26/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: libgnutls26:amd64 2.12.14-5ubuntu3.4 cannot be configured because libgnutls26 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls26/+bug/1232532/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 543366] Re: vuze wont start
Azureus/vuze looks for the symbolic link swt.jar in /usr/share/java which should point to the current version in that directory. At present this is swt-gtk-3.5.1.jar, but the link is missing, so it isn't found. Thus, it refuses to start. Navigate to the directory cd /usr/share/java and create the link sudo ln -s swt-gtk-3.5.1.jar swt.jar -- vuze wont start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543366 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 426538] Re: package libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Tried to update PAM, but couldn't due to dpkg error, Tried to reconfigure that, and that's when i got that error. Rather than kill debconf frontend i rebooted, and all was well. I'm sure i didn't have any terminals open, but i think i closed one earlier as it was downloading something. You can close this bugreport. -- package libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 426538] [NEW] package libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Description: Triggered by updating after deleting the lock-file in /var/lib/dpkg. No programs requiring lock were running, so i tried deleting the lock file. Update fails, then does partial update and suggests to remove postfix. ProblemType: Package Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 SourcePackage: pam Title: package libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-14-generic x86_64 ** Affects: pam (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package -- package libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 426538] Re: package libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31513007/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31513009/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 426538] Re: package libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Description changed: - Description: Ubuntu 9.04 - Release: 9.04 + Description: + + Triggered by updating after deleting the lock-file in /var/lib/dpkg. + No programs requiring lock were running, so i tried deleting the lock file. + Update fails, then does partial update and suggests to remove postfix. ProblemType: Package Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 SourcePackage: pam Title: package libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-14-generic x86_64 ** Description changed: Description: Triggered by updating after deleting the lock-file in /var/lib/dpkg. No programs requiring lock were running, so i tried deleting the lock file. Update fails, then does partial update and suggests to remove postfix. + + After this libpam-modules has unmet dependencies and refuses to install. + + sudo fuser -v /var/cache/debconf/config.dat + + USERPID ACCESS COMMAND + /var/cache/debconf/config.dat: + root 27318 f frontend ProblemType: Package Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 SourcePackage: pam Title: package libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-14-generic x86_64 ** Description changed: Description: Triggered by updating after deleting the lock-file in /var/lib/dpkg. No programs requiring lock were running, so i tried deleting the lock file. Update fails, then does partial update and suggests to remove postfix. After this libpam-modules has unmet dependencies and refuses to install. + + Conflicts: + libpam-mkhomedir + libpam-motd + libpam-umask + libpam0g-modules sudo fuser -v /var/cache/debconf/config.dat USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /var/cache/debconf/config.dat: root 27318 f frontend ProblemType: Package Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 SourcePackage: pam Title: package libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-14-generic x86_64 -- package libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 426538] Re: package libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 27318 0.0 0.4 58368 16036 ?SSep08 0:00 /usr/bin/perl - pstree says: frontend─┬─config └─whiptail I dont know about that, but i think the reason for this is I killed the dpkg process before updating. Learnt my lesson, won't do it again. I'll post again if i can find anything about the reason the lockfile was made in the first place, or not removed properly. -- package libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 426538] Re: package libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
root 27318 0.0 0.4 58368 16036 ?SSep08 0:00 /usr/bin/perl -w /usr/share/debconf/frontend /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst install All of it wasn't included last time. -- package libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 426538] Re: package libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
dpkg(27308) is the parent process, which lead me to that conclusion. dpkg--configure -a says i have to reconfigure libpam-modules, but then i get: debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another process: Resource temporarily unavailable making it full circle. So can I just start dpkg again? -- package libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 375345] Re: Ubuntu One name creates confusion
Take suggestions and put up a vote in the forums. 2009/8/15 José Tomás Atria jtat...@gmail.com I just wanted to chip in with a +1 to Matthew. I was (am?) one of the more vocal critics of the name decision, and stated my position in very strong terms above (something i later apologised for), but I too think that the whole point of the bug report was to submit the issue to the sanction of the community council. Since the CC discussed it and reached a solution, even one that i personally don't agree with, i think the bug report should be closed. You can't win 'em all, and i think that community is very much about accepting things even when they don't go your way. just my two cents... On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Paul Sladenubu...@paul.sladen.org wrote: Matthew: Indeed, if you (as one of the proponents of the issue) are willing and comfortable with closing the bug now, then I would recommend doing so---it would solve an impasse in the way that corporate closure cannot; and the item can finally be removed from the CC agenda. -- Ubuntu One name creates confusion https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375345 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem -- Ubuntu One name creates confusion https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375345 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in Ubunet: Incomplete Status in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: The usage of the word Ubuntu in the context of Ubuntu One is inconsistent with the Trademark Policy outlined at http://www.ubuntu.com/aboutus/trademarkpolicy Specifically of note are the following: The objective of the Ubuntu trademark policy is to encourage widespread use of the Ubuntu trademarks by the Ubuntu community while controlling that use in order to avoid confusion on the part of Ubuntu users and the general public, to maintain the value of the image and reputation of the trademarks and to protect them from inappropriate or unauthorised use. The danger of confusion among users and the general public about whether this new service is part of or associated with Ubuntu is extremely high. there is no commercial intent behind the use The service has clear and stated commercial intent. what you are referring to is in fact Ubuntu. If someone is confused into thinking that what isn't Ubuntu is in fact Ubuntu, you are probably doing something wrong The service is not Ubuntu and has no association with Ubuntu as a product or community. It merely runs on and works with Ubuntu, on equal footing with other applications like Apache, Firefox, or an Ubuntu user's blog. there is no suggestion (through words or appearance) that your project is approved, sponsored, or affiliated with Ubuntu or its related projects unless it actually has been approved by and is accountable to the Ubuntu Community Council I am not aware of any such approval or even discussion by the Community Council at this time. If you are producing new software which is intended for use with or on Ubuntu, you may use the Trademark in a way which indicates the intent of your product. For example, if you are developing a system management tool for Ubuntu, acceptable project titles would be System Management for Ubuntu or Ubuntu Based Systems Management. We would strongly discourage, and likely would consider to be problematic, a name such as UbuntuMan, Ubuntu Management, ManBuntu, etc. Furthermore, you may not use the Trademarks in a way which implies an endorsement where that doesn't exist, or which attempts to unfairly or confusingly capitalise on the goodwill or brand of the project. The service clearly falls under the latter list of examples similar to UbuntuMan, and as such is named unacceptably. Furthermore it appears to be attempting to capitalize on the brand, which is similarly explicitly prohibited. Proposed fix: Rename the service to not include the words UBUNTU, KUBUNTU, EDUBUNTU, and XUBUNTU nor any mark ending with the letters UBUNTU or BUNTU, or in an acceptably non-ambiguous manner such as Cloud Storage Solution for Ubuntu. -- Ubuntu One name creates confusion https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375345 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270798] Re: lockups with default (hpet) clocksource on 2.6.27-2-generic 64-bit
Mine went away when i removed sync as a mode option. Can be found in /etc/fstab -- lockups with default (hpet) clocksource on 2.6.27-2-generic 64-bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 344916] Re: run crashed with DBusException in call_blocking()
8.04 → 8.10 → 9.04 Updated, but still crashes. ** Attachment added: checkbox.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24970306/checkbox.txt -- run crashed with DBusException in call_blocking() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344916 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 342997] [NEW] package libc6 2.9-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: package libc6 is already installed and configured
Public bug reported: Jaunty 9.04 (alpha 6 state currently) updated from 8.10 and previously 8.04. Cruft remover returns dpkg error. Worked on the second run. libc6 2.9-4ubuntu2 is the version I have installed, so I am guessing the packet is erroneously reported as cruft by the Computer Janitor. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Dependencies: libgcc1 1:4.3.3-5ubuntu3 gcc-4.3-base 4.3.3-5ubuntu3 findutils 4.4.0-2ubuntu3 libc6 2.9-4ubuntu2 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ErrorMessage: package libc6 is already installed and configured Package: libc6 2.9-4ubuntu2 SourcePackage: glibc Title: package libc6 2.9-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: package libc6 is already installed and configured Uname: Linux 2.6.28-9-generic i686 ** Affects: glibc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 -- package libc6 2.9-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: package libc6 is already installed and configured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342997 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 342997] Re: package libc6 2.9-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: package libc6 is already installed and configured
** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23869925/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package libc6 2.9-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: package libc6 is already installed and configured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342997 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301189] Re: Vuze's updater will not upgrade to 4.0.0.4
Im also having this problem (8.10 64bit) There is a thread about this on the azureus boards http://forum.vuze.com/thread.jspa?threadID=78780 -- Vuze's updater will not upgrade to 4.0.0.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301189] Re: Vuze's updater will not upgrade to 4.0.0.4
Whats wrong with just updating the package to 4.0.0.4 from package management? It seems to work quite well. I removed the 3.0.0.1 package and manually installed the 4.0.0.4 from azureus. The one at http://www.getdeb.net/comment/1566 seems to be incompatible according to the comments. This package is not correct By dalonso, 2008-11-06 22:26:50 This package should not be in the Intrepid category. The package depends on gtk-swt-3.2, that is incompatible with xulrunner-1.9, the version of gecko that comes with Intrepid. You should rebuild it with gtk-swt-3.4, otherwise the Browser is not working. It's true that it works as long as downloading of torrents, but without the browser it is like using transmission. So, please, please, rebuild with the correct dependencies so I can use this great program!!! I cant comment on this, but 4.0.0.4 seems to work fine using the classic UI, it even retained my settings and more importantly stopped the update loop. I dont know about ubuntu policy, but why is there an ancient version in the repos? Since the package has been broken in the past in ubuntu i suggest stop pulling hacks out to fix it and just stick with the regular stable releases. Either that or disable the auto-update check in vuze. There seems to be a lack of communication between the MOTU and the Vuze team. Hope it can be fixed soon :) -- Vuze's updater will not upgrade to 4.0.0.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301189] Re: Vuze's updater will not upgrade to 4.0.0.4
Not mine. Are you sure you removed the prior version that was installed from the repo? I can also Check for updates... without problems. -- Vuze's updater will not upgrade to 4.0.0.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105420] Re: both iwlwifi and ipw3945 are unable to turn off rf_kill
I got it to work on a fresh ubuntu 8.04 install, then when i updated the kernel it was gone again. Going back to the old didnt do the trick, nor did a reinstall. The solution lies in the Bios version, because the killswitch button does not work. This was confirmed by trying another card known to work. Solution: I was able to get it to work with the latest firmware (B0G) Its available from fujitsu-siemens http://support.fujitsu-siemens.com/Download/ShowDescription.asp?SoftwareGUID=7F5DC06C-7C41-453C-A791-2D9039BB73FAOSID=665F4A20-6E31-43C3-82C2-D98CE773007CStatus=TrueComponent=Flash%20Bios%20for%20AMILO%20Pro%20V3505 Dont worry about the XP category selection, BIOS is the same regardles of OS. Burn .ISO to disk and boot. Press F12 to select CD during post. Write FLASH when prompted. -- both iwlwifi and ipw3945 are unable to turn off rf_kill https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105420 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 224404] Re: MTRR is not properly setup on Intel Northbridge Chipset (P35, X38, X48) with more than 3GB RAM and with Memory Remapping Enabled
Output of cat /proc/mtrr X48 4GB 32bit ubuntu 8.04.1 3870 reg00: base=0x ( 0MB), size=4096MB: write-back, count=1 reg01: base=0xe000 (3584MB), size= 512MB: uncachable, count=1 reg02: base=0xd000 (3328MB), size= 256MB: uncachable, count=1 reg03: base=0x1 (4096MB), size=1024MB: write-back, count=1 reg04: base=0x13000 (4864MB), size= 256MB: uncachable, count=1 reg05: base=0xcff0 (3327MB), size= 1MB: uncachable, count=1 X48 3GB 64bit ubuntu 8.04.1 3870 reg00: base=0x ( 0MB), size=4096MB: write-back, count=1 reg01: base=0xc000 (3072MB), size=1024MB: uncachable, count=1 reg02: base=0xbff0 (3071MB), size= 1MB: uncachable, count=1 -- MTRR is not properly setup on Intel Northbridge Chipset (P35, X38, X48) with more than 3GB RAM and with Memory Remapping Enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224404 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
