I've tried the ufraw-batch fix here, but I still don't get thumbnails
for CR2 files. I have the raw.thumbnailer file set up correctly with
the proper ufraw-batch executable. ufraw-batch works fine from the
command line, but I don't get any thumbnails. I have restarted without
success. I am
ERROR [ 5243] [0x7fd74a83a700] Pipeline at 0x33e9610pipeline
Dec 09 12:03:42 _handleErrorMessage: error from
/GstPipeline:pipeline0/GstBin:bin0/GnlComposition:gnlcomposition1/GnlSource:gnlsource:
Thanks. I am aware of that and similar workarounds, but the issue
remains. The more important thing to address is to more consistently
and properly handle which screen is primary. There are not easy ways to
set this, change it, or remember for the future. I have been testing
Gnome 3 and the
Good idea Kim. Unfortunately, that isn't an option in my BIOS and I
suspect many others can't change it either.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760814
Title:
Compiz Very Slow and
libva 1.0.12-1~xup seems to improve certain cases, but it doesn't work
most of the time for me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773466
Title:
libva1 trying to open
I posted in note #35 that KDE/Kwin doesn't appear to be affected, but I
am no longer certain that is the case. I am noticing significant
sluggishness, especially when using dual displays. glxgears is choppy,
but not to the extent that it is when running compiz. Perhaps KDE is
just more CPU and
After more research, this is seeming more and more like a compiz bug.
While the nvidia driver also seems to have problems and it certainly
isn't helping things, Gnome 3/Mutter and KDE/Kwin do not appear to be
affected. As I mentioned in comment #40, KDE is slower for me than
Gnome, especially on
I tested a machine with integrated ATI 4250 graphics today. The same
sluggish problem was very evident. Glxgears reported favorable fps, but
was very choppy and barely moved in some cases. This seems to point to
compiz as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
If it helps, KDE does not appear to be affected. However, the nvidia
driver does seem buggy in other ways. For example, my computer froze
when resizing a transparent terminal window in KDE. That is probably a
different problem though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
The problem doesn't seem to be present or is much less evident with
Gnome 3 and Mutter. glxgears runs normally, but scrolling is still a
bit sluggish.
I should also note that I have my video card configured with the
performance profile. It is always running at maximum speed at the
expense of
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: compiz
Graphical effects on the Ubuntu Classic desktop with effects (compiz)
are very slow and choppy. This includes opening and minimizing windows,
moving windows, and more. Even applications feel overall sluggish.
glxgears reports favorable
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760814
Title:
Compiz Very Slow and Choppy in Natty Classic
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-panel
When using the Ubuntu Classic UI in Natty, Gnome panels cannot be moved
with drag-and-drop. This is a problem mainly for users of multiple
screens. Holding the alt key used to enable repositioning of the
panels in Maverick, but this no
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760824
Title:
Unable to Move Gnome Panel in Natty
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Upgrading to kernel 2.6.35 fixed the problem for me. Does this mean
that it's not a pulse problem? I was thinking either some
timing/scheduling bug or an issue with older Realtek drivers.
--
pulseaudio ratelimit.c messages and jittery sound
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545065
You received
This is still a problem in Lucid and Maverick, especially with
processors with many cores (ie. more than 4). Setting the threshold
lower greatly improves performance and responsiveness.
--
ondemand cpufreq governor broken on core 2 duo cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475706
You received
I am still getting this problem on Jaunty with kernel 2.6.28-13. It
mainly happens when some large files are transferred at high speed
through my local wireless network (using SSH). The problem is
infrequent, but it is inconvenient when a transfer is halted because of
this.
Can anyone confirm
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25546021/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25546022/Disassembly.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25546025/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: evolution
Evolution crashed when checking mail from an IMAP server. The last
status message displayed showed that it was filtering messages. This
does not happen every time, but Evolution has been crashing more often
lately.
ProblemType: Crash
I am getting this same problem on my Lenovo T61 with kernel 2.6.28-11
with the latest Jaunty updates. After some time, my network connection
goes down with the error: iwlagn: Microcode SW error detected.
NetworkManager doesn't seem to sense the disconnect, but reconnecting to
the wireless network
Tyler, thanks for maintaining your own packages. However, after
reviewing the notes here, it seems that this is a true wine bug, not
ie4linux. Is that correct? If so, why wouldn't the wine developers
want to know about it and fix it? I'm sure it is likely to affect many
users.
I personally
Ah, I understand now. Well thanks for helping in any case.
--
[Hardy] Wine 100% cpu usage
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205895
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Do the wine folks know of the problem and the fix? Do you know if the
patch will be merged into the official wine? Thanks for the debugging
work.
--
[Hardy] Wine 100% cpu usage
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205895
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
It seems to be working normally now from a cold start. I'm not sure why
the problem occurred in the first place. I will post a new bug report
if it happens again.
--
[Intrepid] Update kernel to Linux 2.6.27.12
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321472
You received this bug notification because
When using the new 2.6.27-12 kernel, my keyboard and mouse stops
responding after logging into X. To clarify, they do work on the login
screen, but that's it. The only thing changed was the new kernel.
Booting from 2.6.27-11 works normally. If it helps, I am running a
Lenovo T61 laptop with an
Sorry Bryce. I figured there were already enough logs attached, but I
would be happy to include mine as well. Since I'm only testing with a
LiveCD and it won't boot into X, how do you suggest I go about getting
this log? Is there an easy method? Thanks.
--
[i845G] Fatal server error:
I tested Jaunty Daily Build 1/27/2009 and the bug still occurs. Is DRI2
live yet? If not, do we have an ETA? I am happy to re-test when it
makes sense.
--
[i845G] Fatal server error: Couldn't bind memory for BO front buffer (Jaunty)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304871
You received this bug
I tested again with the Jaunty daily build LiveCD from 1/27/2009 and X
still crashes upon startup. Ubuntu falls back to low-graphics mode
with the following error:
Failed to pin front buffer: Cannot allocate memory
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete =
I tested again with the Jaunty daily build LiveCD from 1/27/2009 and X
still crashes upon startup. Ubuntu falls back to low-graphics mode
with the following error:
Failed to pin front buffer: Cannot allocate memory
--
[i945] [gutsy, hardy, intrepid] Blank screen and (EE) intel(0): overrun on
I tested again with the Jaunty daily build LiveCD from 1/27/2009 and X
still crashes upon startup. Ubuntu falls back to low-graphics mode
with the following error:
Failed to pin front buffer: Cannot allocate memory
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete =
I tested this with the Jaunty Alpha 2 LiveCD the X still crashes during
startup because memory cannot be allocated properly. It then falls back
to low graphics mode.
--
[i845G] Hard crash entering X
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285250
You received this bug notification because you are a
I tested this with the Jaunty Alpha 2 LiveCD the X still crashes during
startup because memory cannot be allocated properly. It then falls back
to low graphics mode.
--
[i945] [gutsy, hardy, intrepid] Blank screen and (EE) intel(0): overrun on pipe
B! on i945GM using intel driver
32 matches
Mail list logo
