[Bug 235327] Re: ubuntu-desktop recommends linux-headers-generic

2014-09-07 Thread lucatrv
Ok, thanks for the notice, I confirm that the issue regarding the 
linux-headers-* packages is fixed.
The only glitch now is that linux-image-* packages are not required by other 
packages. In my opinion the metapackage ubuntu-minimal should depend on the 
virtual package linux-image, ensuring that at least one of the 
linux-image-* packages is installed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235327

Title:
  ubuntu-desktop recommends linux-headers-generic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/235327/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 302615] [NEW] strange behavior of the module-assistant --prepare command

2008-11-26 Thread lucatrv
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: module-assistant

On Ubuntu Intrepid, I use module-assistant to build and install the 
open-vm-source modules.
I noticed a strange behavior of the module-assistant --prepare command.

Starting from the point where no /usr/src/linux symlink is present in my 
system, the first time I issue the command sudo module-assistant prepare 
open-vm everything goes well, so that a /usr/src/linux symlink is created 
pointing to the correct linux headers folder and no error messages are issued.
This is the output of the command:
--
Getting source for kernel version: 2.6.27-7-generic
Kernel headers available in /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.27-7-generic
Creating symlink...
apt-get install build-essential 
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
build-essential is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.

Done!
--

If I issue the command sudo module-assistant prepare open-vm a second time, 
so that the /usr/src/linux symlink is already present on my system, it seams 
that module-assistant doesn't recognize it. In fact it issues the following 
error message:
--
Getting source for kernel version: 2.6.27-7-generic
Kernel headers available in /usr/src/linux
Creating symlink...
Couldn't create the /usr/src/linux symlink!
apt-get install build-essential 
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
build-essential is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.

Done!
--
The result is that module-assistant has renamed my old good /usr/src/linux 
symlink into linux-OLDVERSION.xx and I don't have a /usr/src/linux 
symlink on my system anymore.

Now, of course if I issue again sudo module-assistant prepare open-vm
I get no error messages and a new /usr/src/linux symlink, and everything
repeats always this way indefinitely...

** Affects: module-assistant (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
strange behavior of the module-assistant --prepare command
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302615
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 300839] Re: open-vm-source should recommend installation of packages needed for modules compilation

2008-11-24 Thread lucatrv
Sorry, it was my mistake. I had problems compiling the open-vm modules, so I 
tried many solutions and I also installed those -dev packages following this 
article:
http://www.debianadmin.com/install-open-vm-tools-on-debian-40-etch.html
I now understand that the only reason why I couldn't compile the modules is 
connected with bug #278711, while all those -dev packages are actually not 
needed to compile the modules. Applying the patch posted in bug #278711 solved 
my problems.
You can close/delete this bug.

-- 
open-vm-source should recommend installation of packages needed for modules 
compilation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300839
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 300839] [NEW] open-vm-source should recommend installation of packages needed for modules compilation

2008-11-21 Thread lucatrv
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: open-vm-source

module-assistant cannot compile open-vm-source unless all the required 
development packages needed for compilation are installed.
The full list of needed packages is reported in:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/+source/open-vm-tools
I think all these needed packages should be recommended by open-vm-source (in 
fact, the installation of open-vm-source without those packages is nearly 
useless).

Since open-vm-source already depends on bzip2, debhelper, and dpatch, here is 
the list of packages which should be added in open-vm-source as recommended:
*  autotools-dev
*  libdumbnet-dev
*  libgtk2.0-dev
*  libicu-dev
*  libpam0g-dev
*  libproc-dev
*  liburiparser-dev
*  libx11-dev
*  libxinerama-dev
*  libxss-dev
*  libxtst-dev

** Affects: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
open-vm-source should recommend installation of packages needed for modules 
compilation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300839
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 235327] Re: ubuntu-desktop recommends linux-headers-generic

2008-11-04 Thread lucatrv
I thought of another possibility. In my opinion the cleaner solution
would be that ubuntu-desktop doesn't recommend any linux-headers-*,
while each linux-* kernel package itself recommends the appropriate
linux-headers-* (so for instance linux-generic recommends linux-headers-
generic and so on). In fact, I think the linux-headers should be
recommandable even in a system without a desktop installed...

-- 
ubuntu-desktop recommends linux-headers-generic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 235327] Re: ubuntu-desktop recommends linux-headers-generic

2008-10-22 Thread lucatrv
Yes, that would be a good solution IMHO.

-- 
ubuntu-desktop recommends linux-headers-generic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 235327] [NEW] ubuntu-desktop recommends linux-headers-generic

2008-05-27 Thread lucatrv
Public bug reported:

ubuntu-desktop should not recommend linux-headers-generic, since not everyone 
use that kernel.
For instance, since I run ubuntu inside a vmware virtual machine, I use the 
linux-virtual kernel instead of the linux-generic kernel. So for me the 
linux-headers-generic package is useless, and should be substituted with the 
linux-headers-virtual package.
I think ubuntu-desktop should recommend ONE among linux-headers-* packages 
(which could be for instance linux-headers-generic, linux-headers-virtual, 
linux-headers-server, linux-headers-xen and so on...)
In other words, installing either of these packages should satisfy the 
ubuntu-desktop recommendation.

** Affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
ubuntu-desktop recommends linux-headers-generic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs