[Bug 1826430] Re: acpi-call-dkms 1.1.0-2ubuntu1: acpi-call kernel module failed to build

2019-04-25 Thread mahmoh
>> arch/x86/Makefile:245: *** You are building kernel with non- retpoline compiler, please update your compiler.. Stop. Missed that, apologies! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1826430

[Bug 1826430] [NEW] acpi-call-dkms 1.1.0-2ubuntu1: acpi-call kernel module failed to build

2019-04-25 Thread mahmoh
Public bug reported: acpi-call-dkms 1.1.0-2ubuntu1: acpi-call kernel module failed to build Linux mp 4.15.0-45-generic #48~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 29 18:03:48 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS Release:16.04 Codename:

[Bug 1814982] Re: efi/arm/arm64: Allow SetVirtualAddressMap() to be omitted

2019-03-19 Thread mahmoh
bionic linux-image-4.15.0-47-generic: - Tested with and without efi=novamap and didn't get past the EFI stub messages. cosmic linux-image-4.18.0-17-generic: - Tested with efi=novamap and the kernel booted and got quite far but then went blank, as expected but this is a good start; without

[Bug 1814982] Re: efi/arm/arm64: Allow SetVirtualAddressMap() to be omitted

2019-03-19 Thread mahmoh
Note: if the point release installers will pick up the 4.18 series kernel with the fix then I think a fix for cosmic will suffice vs. bionic also given the results. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1814982] Re: efi/arm/arm64: Allow SetVirtualAddressMap() to be omitted

2019-02-19 Thread mahmoh
Snapdragon 835 Laptop Results: 4.15 boots to the first 4 lines before kernel 4.18 boots most of the kernel, stops for a bit, then suffers with an rshed crash 5.0 boots to the end of the kernel log, then the screen goes blank Without this patch on the 835 laptops the user sees grub and then

[Bug 1814982] Re: efi/arm/arm64: Allow SetVirtualAddressMap() to be omitted

2019-02-08 Thread mahmoh
** Tags added: arm64 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814982 Title: efi/arm/arm64: Allow SetVirtualAddressMap() to be omitted To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1814982] Re: efi/arm/arm64: Allow SetVirtualAddressMap() to be omitted

2019-02-06 Thread mahmoh
I am unable to provide apport logs due to the nature of the problem (kernel hang on boot before console logging). ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1814982] [NEW] efi/arm/arm64: Allow SetVirtualAddressMap() to be omitted

2019-02-06 Thread mahmoh
Public bug reported: [Impact] The Ubuntu kernel is not currently bootable on various arm64 laptops (HP Envy x2, Asus NovaGo, Lenovo Miix 630, Lenovo Yoga C630, Samsung ...) because of EFI memory permissions/restrictions. The reason is explained in the commit supplied below. [Test Case]

[Bug 1812317] Re: grub is prevented from booting on UEFI Arm64 Laptops - requires 4k aligned headers

2019-02-01 Thread mahmoh
@dannf it appears the patches have may now have been finally approved?: https://www.mail-archive.com/grub-devel@gnu.org/msg28322.html The tester reports that the stock Debian Buster installer works out of the box on this device?! If so, it would be nice if Ubuntu could just pick up the patch

[Bug 1812317] Re: grub is prevented from booting on UEFI Arm64 Laptops - requires 4k aligned headers

2019-01-24 Thread mahmoh
@dannf it's the first of two I believe. This will allow any kernel to boot but then we hit other problems booting stock kernels. The -snapdrogon kernel is for 410E vs. 835/850. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1812317] [NEW] grub is prevented from booting on UEFI Arm64 Laptops - requires 4k aligned headers

2019-01-17 Thread mahmoh
Public bug reported: This will end up as an SRU request to patch grub with 4k aligned headers to allow amr64 UEFI laptops to boot. See https://www.mail-archive.com/grub-devel@gnu.org/msg28224.html and related patch set (hopefully all approved when this bug is reviewed). Without these changes

[Bug 1806108] Re: Ethernet not working on rpi3 b+

2018-12-03 Thread mahmoh
As a work-around, I've noticed on the B+ that if you keep the Ethernet disconnected until it booting and then connect it when you see it hit "... Networking" then it'll pick up DHCP and then run cloud-init next happily. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1771662] Re: [bionic] libvirtError: Node device not found: no node device with matching name

2018-07-24 Thread mahmoh
Hey guys, This looks a lot like a problem Linaro reported [1] and if so it's a Cavium driver bug that I believe they're working on. Have you tried this on any other Arm hardware platform to see if you hit the same problem? [1] https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3778 Thank you. ** Bug

[Bug 1542733] Re: Connect to Hidden Wi-Fi Network, "Connect" grayed out

2018-01-24 Thread mahmoh
Hi Christopher, have you tried to test and see if either your router or laptop wifi hardware are having problems? Your symptom above doesn't appear to be related to this problem, which I'm no longer seeing from several months ago, and it actually sounds like you may be having hardware issues -

[Bug 1670137] Re: zfs l2arc cache inhibits proper suspend

2017-06-06 Thread mahmoh
I can confirm that the problem does not happen when cache is on SATA vs. NVME. I assume this needs to get pushed to the kernel then? Please advise. cache nvme0n1p5 OFFLINE 0 0 0 sda3ONLINE 0 0 0 Linux mp

[Bug 1542733] Re: Connect to Hidden Wi-Fi Network, "Connect" grayed out

2017-04-29 Thread mahmoh
I can also confirm that this problem has been resolved for me as of a couple of weeks ago, I've been running 16.04 for a year now with this problem and using the nm-cli work-around until now: network-manager 1.2.6-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 954082] [NEW] armadaxp test kernel fails to boot

2012-03-13 Thread mahmoh
Private bug reported: Build Version/Date: linux- image-3.2.0-1600-armadaxp_3.2.0-1600.1ppa1_armhf.deb Environment used for testing: armadaxp2 Summary: armadaxp test kernel fails to boot Steps to Reproduce: attempt to boot the kernel Expected result: kernel boots to completion Actual result:

[Bug 940056] Re: [public] armadaxp net installer fails to properly setup initrd for raid (md)

2012-03-13 Thread mahmoh
** Changed in: eilt Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940056 Title: [public] armadaxp net installer fails to properly setup initrd for raid (md) To

[Bug 940025] Re: [public] armadaxp net installer fails to properly encrypt disks (dm-crypt)

2012-03-13 Thread mahmoh
** Changed in: eilt Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940025 Title: [public] armadaxp net installer fails to properly encrypt disks (dm- crypt) To

[Bug 939240] Re: [public] armadaxp kernel slow to umount

2012-03-13 Thread mahmoh
** Changed in: eilt Importance: Undecided = Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/939240 Title: [public] armadaxp kernel slow to umount To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 939240] Re: [public] armadaxp kernel slow to umount

2012-03-05 Thread mahmoh
Tested Precise userspace with 3.0.0.-12-generic-pae i686 kernel as sudo against an ext2 (/boot) umount and it was faster than the same umount using the 3.2 kernel (0.079s vs. 0.089s), all in a VM. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 939645] Re: [public] net install kernel resets after immediately after loading

2012-02-27 Thread mahmoh
** Also affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/939645 Title: [public] net install kernel resets after

[Bug 939645] Re: [public] net install kernel resets after immediately after loading

2012-02-27 Thread mahmoh
uImage boots into installer: precise/main/installer-armhf/20101020ubuntu115/images/armadaxp/ Linux armadaxp3 3.0.0-1500-armadaxp #3-Ubuntu SMP Wed Feb 22 18:12:33 UTC 2012 armv7l GNU/Linux ** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released ** Tags added: cqa-verified

[Bug 940056] Re: [public] armadaxp net installer fails to properly setup initrd for raid (md)

2012-02-27 Thread mahmoh
** Visibility changed to: Public ** This bug has been flagged as a security vulnerability ** Also affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 940056] Re: [public] armadaxp net installer fails to properly setup initrd for raid (md)

2012-02-27 Thread mahmoh
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940056 Title: [public] armadaxp net installer fails to properly setup initrd for raid

[Bug 939240] Re: armadaxp kernel slow to unmount

2012-02-23 Thread mahmoh
** No longer affects: eilt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/939240 Title: armadaxp kernel slow to unmount To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 939240] Re: armadaxp kernel slow to unmount

2012-02-23 Thread mahmoh
** Also affects: eilt Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/939240 Title: armadaxp kernel slow to unmount To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 939240] Re: armadaxp kernel slow to unmount

2012-02-23 Thread mahmoh
** Changed in: eilt Assignee: (unassigned) = Bryan Wu (cooloney) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/939240 Title: armadaxp kernel slow to unmount To manage notifications about this

[Bug 939240] Re: [public] armadaxp kernel slow to umount

2012-02-23 Thread mahmoh
** Summary changed: - armadaxp kernel slow to unmount + [public] armadaxp kernel slow to umount -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/939240 Title: [public] armadaxp kernel slow to umount

[Bug 939645] Re: net install kernel resets after immediately after loading

2012-02-23 Thread mahmoh
** Visibility changed to: Public ** Summary changed: - net install kernel resets after immediately after loading + [public] net install kernel resets after immediately after loading -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 940025] Re: [public] armadaxp net installer fails to properly encrypt disks (dm-crypt)

2012-02-23 Thread mahmoh
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940025 Title: [public] armadaxp net installer fails to properly encrypt disks (dm- crypt) To manage notifications

[Blueprint servercloud-p-virtio-device-driver] Providing VirtIO device driver for other OS

2012-02-07 Thread mahmoh
Blueprint changed by mahmoh: Whiteboard changed: This doesn't need a discussion, just us to do it. -robbie.w Work Items: [ahs3] build the latest virtio drivers: DONE [ahs3] request built driver signing (and wait): DONE [ahs3] package and test signed drivers: DONE [ahs3] release

[Bug 913455] Re: package initscripts 2.87dsf-4ubuntu23.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-01-11 Thread mahmoh
This is all I have, appears to have disappeared N-1 updates ago, there are four logs to look at but no indication as to what happened. If there's anything else I can do please let me know but if this is a one-off then lets kill it, I'm sure there are more important ghosts to chase down. **

[Bug 913455] Re: package initscripts 2.87dsf-4ubuntu23.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-01-10 Thread mahmoh
Brian, I do not know what happened to /etc/init.d/ondemand - it definitely doesn't exist on that system and I did not manually remove it. It doesn't appear that I have disk problems so is there any other way that file could have disappeared? Where do we go from here? -- You received this bug

[Bug 913455] [NEW] package initscripts 2.87dsf-4ubuntu23.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-01-08 Thread mahmoh
Public bug reported: Error appeared during update. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: initscripts 2.87dsf-4ubuntu23.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-13.52-generic 2.6.38.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-13-generic x86_64 AptOrdering: firmware-b43-installer: Purge b43-fwcutter:

[Bug 913455] Re: package initscripts 2.87dsf-4ubuntu23.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-01-08 Thread mahmoh
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913455 Title: package initscripts 2.87dsf-4ubuntu23.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit

[Blueprint servercloud-p-virtio-device-driver] Providing VirtIO device driver for other OS

2011-12-22 Thread mahmoh
Blueprint changed by mahmoh: Whiteboard changed: This doesn't need a discussion, just us to do it. -robbie.w + + [ahs3] build the latest virtio drivers: DONE + [ahs3] request built driver signing (and wait): DONE + [ahs3] package and test signed drivers: INPROGRESS + [ahs3] release signed

[Blueprint servercloud-p-arm-storage-testing] ARM Server Storage Testing

2011-11-03 Thread mahmoh
Blueprint changed by mahmoh: Whiteboard set to: Our testing capability is severely limited until we have real hardware. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/QA/Server https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/server-o-arm-image-validation https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/server-o-arm

[Blueprint server-o-windows-paravirtual-drivers] Packaging of Windows Guest Paravirtual Drivers

2011-10-24 Thread mahmoh
Blueprint changed by mahmoh: Whiteboard changed: Problems: - PV Drivers cannot be installed on an exhisting or pre-installed Win VM - Red Hat PV Drivers are signed and allow install on exhisting guests, drivers must be signed to be installed (initial) for 2008/Win 7 - Signed drivers

[Bug 857746] Re: Drop capabilities bit in emulated e1000

2011-10-19 Thread mahmoh
@Rolf, thank you for the verification. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857746 Title: Drop capabilities bit in emulated e1000 To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 857746] Re: Drop capabilities bit in emulated e1000

2011-10-19 Thread mahmoh
@Rolf, thank you for the verification. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857746 Title: Drop capabilities bit in emulated e1000 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 857746] Re: Drop capabilities bit in emulated e1000

2011-09-27 Thread mahmoh
I've also verified that the above fix passes the PCIHCT test that was previously failing on Lucid (and Oneiric). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857746 Title: Drop

[Bug 857746] Re: Drop capabilities bit in emulated e1000

2011-09-27 Thread mahmoh
I've also verified that the above fix passes the PCIHCT test that was previously failing on Lucid (and Oneiric). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857746 Title: Drop capabilities bit in

[Bug 589063] Re: Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

2011-09-16 Thread mahmoh
@Serge, better late than never but this is still a problem in Lucid (10.04.3 release) and the seabios_0.5.1-0ubuntu2.1~ppa2_all.deb (https://launchpad.net/~dev- nigelj/+archive/bugtest/+files/seabios_0.5.1-0ubuntu2.1%7Eppa2_all.deb) from above allows 2008R2SP1 to boot and install with 16 CPUs. I

[Bug 589063] Re: Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

2011-09-16 Thread mahmoh
@Serge, better late than never but this is still a problem in Lucid (10.04.3 release) and the seabios_0.5.1-0ubuntu2.1~ppa2_all.deb (https://launchpad.net/~dev- nigelj/+archive/bugtest/+files/seabios_0.5.1-0ubuntu2.1%7Eppa2_all.deb) from above allows 2008R2SP1 to boot and install with 16 CPUs. I

[Bug 828718] [NEW] arm net install prepopulates archive with - mirror - vs. - ports.ubuntu.com

2011-08-18 Thread mahmoh
Public bug reported: Build Version/Date: 20101020ubuntu56 Environment used for testing: pandaboard A2 Summary: arm net install prepopulates archive with mirror vs. ports.ubuntu.com Steps to Reproduce: boot woth arm net install and check archive question Expected result: question pre-populates

[Bug 812692] Re: java -cacao -version crashes on ARMv7 - dumpmemory.cpp:113 - core dumped

2011-08-18 Thread mahmoh
** Tags added: armel -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812692 Title: java -cacao -version crashes on ARMv7 - dumpmemory.cpp:113 - core dumped To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 820585] Re: debian install fails to add fixrtc to systems that do not have a battery backed RTC (arm)

2011-08-17 Thread mahmoh
For the net install case, fixrtc would not work since there may not be a disk to use with previous mount information so this part of the problem should also be addressed, or is this a separate bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 820113] Re: uboot fails to automatically load uInitrd and boot hangs

2011-08-15 Thread mahmoh
So the question is why not attempt to install the uInitrd and boot whether or not it's present? It's a rare case for Ubuntu to not provide an uInitrd; if we have pre-programmed uImage and uInitrd memory addresses why wouldn't we try and load both (not just uImage) and then boot? -- You received

[Bug 826877] [NEW] include pxe boot as a default boot method

2011-08-15 Thread mahmoh
Public bug reported: Build Version/Date: u-boot-linaro-omap4-panda_2011.07.2-0ubuntu1_armel.deb Environment used for testing: pandaboard A2 Summary: include pxe boot as a default boot method Steps to Reproduce: boot with no boot.scr, no uEnv.txt Expected result: u-boot attempts pxe boot

[Bug 820116] Re: usb start in uEnv.txt fails with test - minimal test like /bin/sh

2011-08-04 Thread mahmoh
Unsure if you meant that you were going to add it to the documentation but that may be a good idea too? I'll try the above out, Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820116 Title:

[Bug 820116] Re: usb start in uEnv.txt fails with test - minimal test like /bin/sh

2011-08-03 Thread mahmoh
#pxecfg_ram=0x8200 #ethaddr=00:02:03:04:05:06 #usbethaddr=00:02:03:04:05:06 autoload=no bootargs=ro root=/dev/sda2 console=ttyO2,115200 debug earlyprintk elevator=deadline uenvcmd=usb start; pxe get; pxe boot; mmcinfo; fatload mmc 0:1 0x8000 uimage; fatload mmc 0:1 0x8160 uinitrd;

[Bug 820113] [NEW] uboot fails to automatically load uInitrd and boot hangs

2011-08-02 Thread mahmoh
Public bug reported: Build Version/Date: u-boot-linaro-omap4-panda_2011.07.2-0ubuntu1_armel.deb Environment used for testing: pandaboard A2 Summary: uboot fails to automatically load uInitrd and boot hangs Steps to Reproduce: boot with no boot.scr or uEnv.txt files on SD Expected result:

[Bug 820116] [NEW] usb start in uEnv.txt fails with test - minimal test like /bin/sh

2011-08-02 Thread mahmoh
Public bug reported: Build Version/Date: u-boot-linaro-omap4-panda_2011.07.2-0ubuntu1_armel.deb Environment used for testing: pandaboard A2 Summary: usb start in uEnv.txt fails with test - minimal test like /bin/sh Steps to Reproduce: boot with no boot.scr, and uEnv.txt: autoload=no

[Bug 820121] [NEW] bootp via autoload fails to load uInitrd and continues on to fail with Bad image type

2011-08-02 Thread mahmoh
Public bug reported: Note: this may be an artifact of bug # 820113 where uInitrd fails to load after uImage, please confirm Build Version/Date: u-boot-linaro-omap4-panda_2011.07.2-0ubuntu1_armel.deb Environment used for testing: pandaboard A2 Summary: bootp via autoload fails to load uInitrd

[Bug 820122] [NEW] running usb start twice hangs u-boot at ethernet discovery

2011-08-02 Thread mahmoh
Public bug reported: Build Version/Date: u-boot-linaro-omap4-panda_2011.07.2-0ubuntu1_armel.deb Environment used for testing: pandaboard A2 Summary: running usb start twice hangs u-boot at ethernet discovery Steps to Reproduce: manually interrupt boot and enter usb start twice Expected result:

[Bug 820124] [NEW] pxe boot ignores pxe config prompt and timeout value - fails to automatically boot

2011-08-02 Thread mahmoh
Public bug reported: Build Version/Date: u-boot-linaro-omap4-panda_2011.07.2-0ubuntu1_armel.deb Environment used for testing: pandaboard A2 Summary: pxe boot ignores pxe config timeout value and fails to automatically boot Steps to Reproduce: 0) configure pxe config file with timeout value

[Bug 820129] [NEW] boot crash - kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-ti-omap4-2.6.38/kernel/workqueue.c:1029!

2011-08-02 Thread mahmoh
Public bug reported: Build Version/Date: ubuntu oneiric (development branch), 2.6.38-1309-omap4 Environment used for testing: pandaboard A2 Summary: boot crash - kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-ti- omap4-2.6.38/kernel/workqueue.c:1029! Steps to Reproduce: intermittent boot crash Expected

[Bug 820129] Re: boot crash - kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-ti-omap4-2.6.38/kernel/workqueue.c:1029!

2011-08-02 Thread mahmoh
** Also affects: linux-linaro Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Package changed: linux-linaro (Ubuntu) = linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820129

[Bug 814157] [NEW] arm net install fails to install server kernel after selecting Ubuntu Server

2011-07-21 Thread mahmoh
Public bug reported: Installing via net installer and selecting Ubuntu Server should either install an ARM Server Kernel or do something like set elevator=deadline as a bootarg in the meantime (also assuming deadline is wanted with ARM Server). *Assuming there should be a separate server kernel,

[Bug 814157] Re: arm net install fails to install server kernel after selecting Ubuntu Server

2011-07-21 Thread mahmoh
** Package changed: debian-installer (Ubuntu) = base-installer (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/814157 Title: arm net install fails to install server kernel after selecting

[Bug 709245] Re: panda: USB disk IO slow

2011-07-21 Thread mahmoh
Appears to still be a problem with 3.0.0-1: ... Threaded I/O Tester: pts/tiobench-1.1.0 [Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 32MB - Thread Count: 4] Test 1 of 4 Estimated Time Remaining: 4 Hours, 57 Minutes Estimated Test Run-Time: 28 Minutes Expected Trial Run Count: 4

[Bug 812692] [NEW] java -cacao -version crashes on ARMv7 - dumpmemory.cpp:113 - core dumped

2011-07-18 Thread mahmoh
Public bug reported: icedtea-6-jre-cacao 6b23~pre3-0ubuntu2 Linux panda-qa1 2.6.38-1309-omap4 #14-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed Jul 6 09:42:21 UTC 2011 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=11.10 DISTRIB_CODENAME=oneiric DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu oneiric

[Bug 812692] Re: java -cacao -version crashes on ARMv7 - dumpmemory.cpp:113 - core dumped

2011-07-18 Thread mahmoh
** Attachment added: _usr_lib_jvm_java-6-openjdk_jre_bin_java.0.crash.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812692/+attachment/2216348/+files/_usr_lib_jvm_java-6-openjdk_jre_bin_java.0.crash.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 808815] [NEW] pxe missing kernel_ram and initrd_ram defaults

2011-07-11 Thread mahmoh
Public bug reported: u-boot-linaro-omap4-panda_2011.06.5-0ubuntu1_armel.deb Build Version/Date: u-boot-linaro-omap4-panda_2011.06.5-0ubuntu1_armel.deb Environment used for testing: panda-qa (A1?) Summary: pxe missing kernel_ram and initrd_ram defaults Steps to Reproduce: pxe boot without

[Bug 808612] [NEW] pxe fails after loading kernel and initrd

2011-07-10 Thread mahmoh
Public bug reported: u-boot-linaro-omap4-panda_2011.06.5-0ubuntu1_armel.deb Build Version/Date: u-boot-linaro-omap4-panda_2011.06.5-0ubuntu1_armel.deb Environment used for testing: panda-qa (A1?) Summary: pxe fails after loading kernel and initrd Steps to Reproduce: pxe boot with netinstall

[Bug 808612] Re: pxe fails after loading kernel and initrd

2011-07-10 Thread mahmoh
Verified that the patched u-boot provided above does in fact fix the problem, pxe now loads and boots the kernel, will verify in the official release when released: 59f9e68416865d7a366ea45cd79c46e4 u-boot.bin -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Blueprint server-o-windows-paravirtual-drivers] Packaging of Windows Guest Paravirtual Drivers

2011-06-05 Thread mahmoh
Blueprint changed by mahmoh: Whiteboard changed: Problems: - PV Drivers cannot be installed on an exhisting or pre-installed Win VM - Red Hat PV Drivers are signed and allow install on exhisting guests, drivers must be signed to be installed (initial) for 2008/Win 7 - Signed drivers

[Bug 600668] Re: Multiple nic enumeration issue when PXE booting (ENT only)

2010-10-05 Thread mahmoh
** Changed in: jaguarundi Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: jaguarundi Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: jaguarundi Importance: Low = Wishlist -- Multiple nic enumeration issue when PXE booting (ENT only) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600668 You received this bug

[Bug 652392] [NEW] continuous crashes - endless open windows - cpu maxed out

2010-09-30 Thread mahmoh
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Description:Ubuntu maverick (development branch) Release:10.10 nautilus: Installed: 1:2.31.6-0ubuntu3.1 Candidate: 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1 Version table: 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/

[Bug 652392] Re: continuous crashes - endless open windows - cpu maxed out

2010-09-30 Thread mahmoh
** Attachment added: apport.nautilus._cWyfQ.apport https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/652392/+attachment/1659344/+files/apport.nautilus._cWyfQ.apport -- continuous crashes - endless open windows - cpu maxed out https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652392 You received this

[Bug 652392] Re: continuous crashes - endless open windows - cpu maxed out

2010-09-30 Thread mahmoh
New - Invalid: apt-get dist-upgrade fixed it, I was doing apt-get upgrade on the command line (thx milanbv) ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- continuous crashes - endless open windows - cpu maxed out https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652392 You received this

[Bug 570870] Re: pxe boot doesn't work with kvm

2010-09-18 Thread mahmoh
** Project changed: manzanita = airwall ** Changed in: airwall Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Changed in: airwall Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) = mahmoh (mahmoh) ** Changed in: airwall Assignee: mahmoh (mahmoh) = (unassigned) -- pxe boot doesn't work with kvm https

[Bug 589063] Re: Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

2010-09-17 Thread mahmoh
Hope this helps, I was able to boot Server 2008 R2 and run with Maverick's seabios bios.bin (0.6.0-0ubuntu1) file on Lucid on a 16 cpu (2/4/2) system without a problem. I could not boot more than 4 cpus before with Lucid's seabios (0.5.1-0ubuntu2). Working configuration: Linux ubuntu01

[Bug 589063] Re: Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

2010-09-17 Thread mahmoh
Clarification: ... I could not boot more than 4 cpus ... meant that I hit the BSOD with Stop A5 (ACPI) when I tried, so it did boot but just didn't get as far as I hoped. -- Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589063 You received this bug

[Bug 570870] Re: pxe boot doesn't work with kvm

2010-09-17 Thread mahmoh
** Also affects: manzanita Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: manzanita Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: manzanita Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: manzanita Assignee: (unassigned) = Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) -- pxe boot doesn't work

[Bug 589063] Re: Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

2010-09-17 Thread mahmoh
Hope this helps, I was able to boot Server 2008 R2 and run with Maverick's seabios bios.bin (0.6.0-0ubuntu1) file on Lucid on a 16 cpu (2/4/2) system without a problem. I could not boot more than 4 cpus before with Lucid's seabios (0.5.1-0ubuntu2). Working configuration: Linux ubuntu01

[Bug 589063] Re: Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

2010-09-17 Thread mahmoh
Clarification: ... I could not boot more than 4 cpus ... meant that I hit the BSOD with Stop A5 (ACPI) when I tried, so it did boot but just didn't get as far as I hoped. -- Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589063 You received this bug

[Bug 590929] Re: [SRU] eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands (POC + ENT configs)

2010-09-14 Thread mahmoh
Proper error messages are getting reported on upgraded systems without the residual artefacts that were reported in the bug: verified, -done. ** Changed in: jaguarundi Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- [SRU] eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands (POC +

[Bug 590929] Re: [SRU] eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands (POC + ENT configs)

2010-09-14 Thread mahmoh
** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- [SRU] eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands (POC + ENT configs) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590929 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which

[Bug 590929] Re: [SRU] eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands (POC + ENT configs)

2010-09-14 Thread mahmoh
Proper error messages are getting reported on upgraded systems without the residual artefacts that were reported in the bug: verified, -done. ** Changed in: jaguarundi Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- [SRU] eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands (POC +

[Bug 590929] Re: [SRU] eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands (POC + ENT configs)

2010-09-14 Thread mahmoh
** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- [SRU] eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands (POC + ENT configs) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590929 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 635810] [NEW] package grub-pc 1.98 20100804-4ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-11 Thread mahmoh
Public bug reported: upgrade installation failure ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: grub-pc 1.98+20100804-4ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-6.8-generic 2.6.35-rc3 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-6-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: amd64

[Bug 635810] Re: package grub-pc 1.98 20100804-4ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-11 Thread mahmoh
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/635810/+attachment/1570938/+files/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/635810/+attachment/1570939/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt

[Bug 623074] [NEW] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP

2010-08-23 Thread mahmoh
Public bug reported: SMP fault while running, unsure of what caused it but it may have been related to firefox. ProblemType: KernelOops DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: linux-image-2.6.35-14-generic 2.6.35-14.20 Regression: Yes Reproducible: No ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu

[Bug 623074] Re: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP

2010-08-23 Thread mahmoh
** Attachment added: AcpiTables.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623074/+attachment/1514465/+files/AcpiTables.txt ** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623074/+attachment/1514466/+files/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: AplayDevices.txt

[Bug 623074] Re: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP

2010-08-23 Thread mahmoh
[ 2759.484471] general protection fault: [#1] SMP [ 2759.484486] last sysfs file: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq [ 2759.484493] CPU 1 [ 2759.484498] Modules linked in: michael_mic arc4 cryptd aes_x86_64 aes_generic ip6table_filter ip6_tables binfmt_misc rfcomm

[Bug 590929] Re: eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands

2010-08-19 Thread mahmoh
** Changed in: jaguarundi Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: jaguarundi Milestone: None = sales-training ** Changed in: jaguarundi Milestone: sales-training = jaguar-ga -- eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands

[Bug 590929] Re: eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands (POC + ENT configs)

2010-08-19 Thread mahmoh
This problem occurs on the all-in-one configuration. May also occur on ENT config. ** Summary changed: - eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands + eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands (POC + ENT configs) -- eucalyptus create and

[Bug 590929] Re: eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands

2010-08-19 Thread mahmoh
** Changed in: jaguarundi Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: jaguarundi Milestone: None = sales-training ** Changed in: jaguarundi Milestone: sales-training = jaguar-ga -- eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands

[Bug 590929] Re: eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands (POC + ENT configs)

2010-08-19 Thread mahmoh
This problem occurs on the all-in-one configuration. May also occur on ENT config. ** Summary changed: - eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands + eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands (POC + ENT configs) -- eucalyptus create and

[Bug 590929] Re: eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands

2010-08-18 Thread mahmoh
** Also affects: jaguarundi Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: jaguarundi Status: New = Confirmed -- eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590929 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 590929] Re: eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands

2010-08-18 Thread mahmoh
** Also affects: jaguarundi Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: jaguarundi Status: New = Confirmed -- eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590929 You received this bug notification because you are a