[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2016-02-16 Thread mrq1
it looks like strongswan is faking a nat situation if the kernel-libipsec is used, so there are only problems with transport & beet mode .. btw: did you get this audit entries too? # grep audit /var/log/syslog Feb 16 07:56:31 kvm-xenial kernel: [240771.376037] audit: type=1400

[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2016-02-16 Thread mrq1
it looks like strongswan is faking a nat situation if the kernel-libipsec is used, so there are only problems with transport & beet mode .. btw: did you get this audit entries too? # grep audit /var/log/syslog Feb 16 07:56:31 kvm-xenial kernel: [240771.376037] audit: type=1400

[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2016-02-14 Thread mrq1
> chapoly and ntru are part of libstrongswan-extra-plugins you are right! i mixed up libcharon-extra-plugins & libstrongswan-extra-plugins (had only the first one) my tests are looking good so far. chapoly & ntru are working as expected, great work! the MOBIKE handling has much improved since

[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2016-02-14 Thread mrq1
> chapoly and ntru are part of libstrongswan-extra-plugins you are right! i mixed up libcharon-extra-plugins & libstrongswan-extra-plugins (had only the first one) my tests are looking good so far. chapoly & ntru are working as expected, great work! the MOBIKE handling has much improved since

[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2016-02-14 Thread mrq1
thanks for the fast pace! > should be ready in a bit with the new plugin NOPE. still no chapoly & ntru plugin included # ipsec statusall Status of IKE charon daemon (strongSwan 5.3.5, Linux 4.4.0-4-generic, x86_64): uptime: 10 minutes, since Feb 14 08:59:01 2016 malloc: sbrk 1650688, mmap

[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2016-02-14 Thread mrq1
thanks for the fast pace! > should be ready in a bit with the new plugin NOPE. still no chapoly & ntru plugin included # ipsec statusall Status of IKE charon daemon (strongSwan 5.3.5, Linux 4.4.0-4-generic, x86_64): uptime: 10 minutes, since Feb 14 08:59:01 2016 malloc: sbrk 1650688, mmap

[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2016-02-14 Thread mrq1
looks good so far :-) i think the kernel-libipsec plugin should not be loaded by default the plugin works only with UDP encapsulated packets (look here: https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/Kernel- libipsec) and this will break most of the "normal"/LAN setups i would build

[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2016-02-14 Thread mrq1
looks good so far :-) i think the kernel-libipsec plugin should not be loaded by default the plugin works only with UDP encapsulated packets (look here: https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/Kernel- libipsec) and this will break most of the "normal"/LAN setups i would build

[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2016-02-13 Thread mrq1
hi i used your ppa .. looks great with the default plugin package but with the extra plugins: Feb 13 17:22:28 kvm-xenial charon: 00[CFG] mediation client database URI not defined, skipped Feb 13 17:22:28 kvm-xenial charon: 00[CFG] no threshold configured for systime-fix, disabled Feb 13

[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2016-02-13 Thread mrq1
the startup segfault disappears if a purge the extra-plugin package but NOT if i only remove it :-O maybe the bug comes with one of the dependency packages? Feb 13 17:31:24 kvm-xenial charon: 00[LIB] loaded plugins: charon test-vectors aes rc2 sha1 sha2 md4 md5 random nonce x509 revocation

[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2016-02-13 Thread mrq1
great! starts now :-) what about the chapoly plugin? can you enable it in the extra package? it would be very important for me! btw: the output of service looks strange to me # service strongswan status ● strongswan.service - strongSwan IPsec services Loaded: loaded

[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2016-02-13 Thread mrq1
hi i used your ppa .. looks great with the default plugin package but with the extra plugins: Feb 13 17:22:28 kvm-xenial charon: 00[CFG] mediation client database URI not defined, skipped Feb 13 17:22:28 kvm-xenial charon: 00[CFG] no threshold configured for systime-fix, disabled Feb 13

[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2016-02-13 Thread mrq1
the startup segfault disappears if a purge the extra-plugin package but NOT if i only remove it :-O maybe the bug comes with one of the dependency packages? Feb 13 17:31:24 kvm-xenial charon: 00[LIB] loaded plugins: charon test-vectors aes rc2 sha1 sha2 md4 md5 random nonce x509 revocation

[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2016-02-13 Thread mrq1
great! starts now :-) what about the chapoly plugin? can you enable it in the extra package? it would be very important for me! btw: the output of service looks strange to me # service strongswan status ● strongswan.service - strongSwan IPsec services Loaded: loaded

[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2016-02-12 Thread mrq1
is there any progress on this issue? FeatureFreeze & DebianImportFreeze are getting close :-/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1535951 Title: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main)

[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2016-02-12 Thread mrq1
is there any progress on this issue? FeatureFreeze & DebianImportFreeze are getting close :-/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to strongswan in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1535951 Title: Please merge

[Bug 1535076] [NEW] Updaterequst for Xenial

2016-01-17 Thread mrq1
Public bug reported: hi as recommended via launchpad i file a bug for updating the xenial strongswan packages to the current upstream version for me the most wanted features are: IKEv2 fragmentation (i have lots of problems with clients behind old nat devices which would be fixed by this)

[Bug 1535076] [NEW] Updaterequst for Xenial

2016-01-17 Thread mrq1
Public bug reported: hi as recommended via launchpad i file a bug for updating the xenial strongswan packages to the current upstream version for me the most wanted features are: IKEv2 fragmentation (i have lots of problems with clients behind old nat devices which would be fixed by this)

[Bug 1283704] [NEW] cannot set initiator name during install

2014-02-23 Thread mrq1
Public bug reported: during install to a iscsi drive the installer (using netbootet 14.04 BETA) choose a random initiatorname in the form iqn.1993-08.org.debian:01:afadfcc960dd or iqn.1993-08.org.debian:01:1a9a2ac41d44 if the target in use ist based on the LIO target than there is no option to

[Bug 683521] [NEW] ncal does not support ISO 8601 week date

2010-12-01 Thread mrq1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bsdmainutils the ncal provided with maverick has no option to print week dates in the ISO 8601 format info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_week_date ncal -w December 2010 Mo 6 13 20 27 Tu 7 14 21 28 We 1 8 15 22 29 Th 2 9 16 23 30 Fr

[Bug 604366] Re: cal -m doesn't work anymore

2010-12-01 Thread mrq1
does not work with maverick: unalias cal cal -M usage: cal [-hjy] [[month] year] cal [-hj] [-m month] [year] ncal [-hJjpwy3MS] [-s country_code] [[month] year] ncal [-hJeo] [year] seems to work only via ncal unalias ncal ncal -M December 2010 Mo 6 13 20 27 Tu

[Bug 604366] [NEW] cal -m doesn't work anymore

2010-07-11 Thread mrq1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bsdmainutils output of karmic version: ~ /media/karmic/usr/bin/cal -m July 2010 Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 lucid version: ~

[Bug 198871] Re: Jmicron AHCI controller probs...

2010-01-19 Thread mrq1
here the same with revision 3 of the controller 03:00.0 SATA controller: JMicron Technologies, Inc. JMicron 20360/20363 AHCI Controller (rev 03) 03:00.1 IDE interface: JMicron Technologies, Inc. JMicron 20360/20363 AHCI Controller (rev 03) [ 7471.163585] ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0

[Bug 483618] [NEW] TechnoTrend TT-budget S2-1600 init fails

2009-11-16 Thread mrq1
Public bug reported: karmic kernel fails to init a technotrend dvb-s2 card (the frontend module) TechnoTrend TT-budget S2-1600, PCI lspci: 05:04.0 Multimedia controller: Philips Semiconductors SAA7146 (rev 01) Subsystem: Technotrend Systemtechnik GmbH Device 101c Flags: bus

[Bug 365021] [NEW] tar: extract with wildcards missleading

2009-04-22 Thread mrq1
Public bug reported: the extracting of multiple files from a tar file doesnt work as expected: $ touch a{a,b,c,d} b{a,b} wildcard adding of files is ok: $ tar cfa test.tar.bz2 a* b* $ rm a* b* $ tar xfa test.tar.bz2 b* tar: Pattern matching characters used in file names. Please, tar: use

[Bug 243677] Re: intrepid kernel 2.6.26-2-generic won't boot as kvm guest

2008-07-23 Thread mrq1
It tells kvm to trick the guest into thinking that the host's kernel doesn't support the paravirt clocksource, since the ABI is broken in the hardy kernels (and *only* the hardy kernels) . i think this is untrue. i wrote above, that i had this problem ALSO with a kernel.org kernel as

[Bug 243677] Re: intrepid kernel 2.6.26-2-generic (amd64) won't boot as kvm guest

2008-07-09 Thread mrq1
In intrepid, the bug is gone, since we have a newer host kernel. are you sure? i get this bug too with a (then) up-to-date 2.6.26-rc8 host-kernel. this would imply, that the intrepid (host) kernel has an fix, which the kernel.org kernel does not have. -- intrepid kernel 2.6.26-2-generic

[Bug 243677] Re: intrepid kernel 2.6.26-2-generic (amd64) won't boot as kvm guest

2008-07-08 Thread mrq1
is the bug really in Hardy's 2.6.24 kernel i dont think so. i tried again with 2.6.26-rc8 as host-kernel, and it does not work. but if i use no-kvmclock, intrepid boots fine :-) -- intrepid kernel 2.6.26-2-generic (amd64) won't boot as kvm guest https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243677 You

[Bug 243677] intrepid i386 does not boot too (as kvm guest)

2008-06-29 Thread mrq1
i tried the intrepid i386 alpha1 as kvm guest it does not boot too! it hangs right after starting install from the graphical boot menu. choosing check cdrom ... does not work to. the windows goes black, for one second, there is a underscore cursur in the topleft. after this the screen goes

[Bug 232004] Re: qemu alsa support sucks

2008-06-26 Thread mrq1
hi i have the same problem on hardy amd64 with non-ubuntu 2.6.26-rc8 kernel # cat start-xp.sh #!/bin/bash export QEMU_AUDIO_DRV=alsa kvm -net nic,macaddr=00:13:37:00:00:07,model=rtl8139 -net tap,vlan=0,ifname=kvm0,script=no -soundhw all -m 512 -hda 20gb-xp-workcopy.dd # ./start-xp.sh alsa:

[Bug 175592] filesystem access hang on a nfs-exported encrypted partition

2007-12-11 Thread mrq1
Public bug reported: distribution: kubuntu 07.10 i did a default-install with the option to encrypt the complete disk with LUKS and putting LVM on top of that; after the installation, i tried to export a part of this filesystems via NFS, which seems to work; but now to the problem: after

[Bug 89827] Voodoo5 uses VESA too

2007-03-21 Thread mrq1
i have a voodoo5 5500 in my system; i tried it with kubuntu feisty herd5 yesterday, but it also choose the VESA driver; but the situation was even worse :-( after finished with booting from the cd, the screen was completly distorted; i tried to boot with safe grafics mode, but that does not

[Bug 47899] Re: Installer crashed (probably due to XFS /)

2006-07-05 Thread mrq1
have the same here with kubuntu 6.06 /var/log/installer/syslog tells me: === Wed, 05 Jul 2006 19:46:31 INFO mount --bind /proc /target/proc Wed, 05 Jul 2006 19:46:31 INFO mount --bind /dev /target/dev ubiquity: Starting up