[Bug 1387908] Re: [udev] FIDO u2f security keys should be supported out of the box

2017-11-11 Thread nicoo
Hi,

Yubico maintains the relevant udev rules (for u2f tokens in general, not
only Yubico-branded ones) in libu2f-host, and I recently started
shipping those in Debian as a separate binary package (libu2f-udev)
rather than having u2f udev rules in our systemd package.

You might want to consider making this package installed by default, as
it seems more up-to-date than the current solution in Ubuntu, and would
let us cooperate (between Debian and Ubuntu, but also with upstream) and
avoid fixing the same problems in many places.

Best,

  nicoo

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387908

Title:
  [udev] FIDO u2f security keys should be supported out of the box

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1387908/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1499783] Re: Add udev rules for others U2F tokens

2017-11-11 Thread nicoo
Hi,

Yubico maintains the relevant udev rules (for u2f tokens in general, not
only Yubico-branded ones) in libu2f-host, and I recently started
shipping those in Debian as a separate binary package (libu2f-udev).

You might want to consider adopting this package, which seems more up-
to-date than the current solution in Ubuntu, as we could cooperate (but
between Debian and Ubuntu, but also with upstream) and avoid fixing the
same problems in many places.


Best,

  nicoo

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1499783

Title:
  Add udev rules for others U2F tokens

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libu2f-host/+bug/1499783/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1551393] Re: Duplicated pam_u2f.so

2017-11-11 Thread nicoo
Hi,

It seems the package `pam-u2f` should be simply removed, as it is
unmaintained and provides the same software as `libpam-u2f` (which is
the correct name, according to the Debian convention).

(For information, I maintain libpam-u2f, libu2f-host and libu2f-server
in Debian)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551393

Title:
  Duplicated pam_u2f.so

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam-u2f/+bug/1551393/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1318678] Re: haveged consumes 100% cpu when used with -w > 4067

2016-07-05 Thread nicoo
PS: The solved issues include launchpad bugs #1540978 (and its duplicate
#915218).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318678

Title:
  haveged consumes 100% cpu when used with -w > 4067

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haveged/+bug/1318678/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1318678] Re: haveged consumes 100% cpu when used with -w > 4067

2016-07-05 Thread nicoo
Hi,

This has been fixed, along with a number of other issues, in the Debian package.
I attached the relevant patch, but you might want to consider tracking the 
upstream Debian package.


Best,

  nicoo

** Patch added: "0003-Don-t-set-a-watermark-higher-than-pool-size.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haveged/+bug/1318678/+attachment/4695942/+files/0003-Don-t-set-a-watermark-higher-than-pool-size.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318678

Title:
  haveged consumes 100% cpu when used with -w > 4067

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haveged/+bug/1318678/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1548342] [NEW] No debconf answer for autologin

2016-02-22 Thread nicoo
Public bug reported:

There are no debconf answers for configuring autologin (nor 
`greeter-hide-users` for that matter).
Would it be possible to add this?

** Affects: lightdm
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: lightdm (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: lightdm (Debian)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: lightdm (Debian)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: lightdm (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1548342

Title:
  No debconf answer for autologin

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1548342/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs