[Bug 1881603] Re: [snap] Cannot open attached file from e-mail

2020-11-24 Thread pwaring
I know this has been marked as 'wishlist', and perhaps it's not an issue
for most people, but I've had to revert to using the .deb because this
bug breaks my workflow every day (I receive and open lots of documents
via email and through websites using Firefox).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881603

Title:
  [snap] Cannot open attached file from e-mail

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1881603/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1615579] Re: Vagrant fails to bring up xenial64 instance on VirtualBox

2020-11-06 Thread pwaring
Is this bug still relevant? I have tried the latest ubuntu/xenial64
(v20201104.0.0) and it boots without any problems.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615579

Title:
  Vagrant fails to bring up xenial64 instance on VirtualBox

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vagrant/+bug/1615579/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1881603] Re: [snap] Cannot open attached file from e-mail

2020-11-06 Thread pwaring
The problem is if you have LibreOffice installed as a snap and try to
open an attachment in Thunderbird, LibreOffice will generate an error
message saying that it can open the file because it does not exist (in
reality it does exist but LibreOffice can't read it, so the message is a
bit misleading).

This is not a Thunderbird bug as the same thing happens if you try an
open a file via Firefox (i.e. you click on a link to download a
spreadsheet and select Open With: LibreOffice Calc).

If you have LibreOffice installed via apt then you can open files via
Thunderbird and other applications, presumably because the .deb version
is not confined in the same way as the snap.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881603

Title:
  [snap] Cannot open attached file from e-mail

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1881603/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1881603] Re: [snap] Cannot open attached file from e-mail

2020-11-06 Thread pwaring
Sorry, that should be: LibreOffice will generate an error message saying
that it *can't* open the file

(Launchpad really needs a comment edit function!)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881603

Title:
  [snap] Cannot open attached file from e-mail

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1881603/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1881603] Re: [snap] Cannot open attached file from e-mail

2020-11-06 Thread pwaring
In case anyone else hits this problem and is wondering about the root
cause, it seems to be because snaps generally can't access data from
other applications, so when Thunderbird drops a file into /tmp
LibreOffice can't "see" it. This isn't unique to LibreOffice, it causes
problems for other snaps as well (e.g. Chromium).

This doesn't happen with the non-snap version of LibreOffice distributed
through the Ubuntu archive and available via `apt install`, so switching
to that is a workaround, albeit at a lower version (6.4.2 instead of
7.0.2.2).

There are a few Ask Ubuntu posts with additional information and other
workarounds:

https://askubuntu.com/questions/1123537/cant-open-file-attachment-with-
libreoffice-snap

https://askubuntu.com/questions/1046890/libreoffice-cant-access-tmp-
files-in-18-04

https://askubuntu.com/questions/1215305/how-can-i-grant-a-snap-
application-access-to-tmp-via-command-line

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881603

Title:
  [snap] Cannot open attached file from e-mail

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1881603/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1881603] Re: [snap] Cannot open attached file from e-mail

2020-11-06 Thread pwaring
In case anyone else hits this problem and is wondering about the root
cause, it seems to be because snaps generally can't access data from
other applications, so when Thunderbird drops a file into

This doesn't happen with the non-snap version of LibreOffice distributed
through the Ubuntu archive and available via `apt install`, so switching
to that is a workaround.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881603

Title:
  [snap] Cannot open attached file from e-mail

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1881603/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1595289] Re: composer validate can't find spdx-licenses.json

2018-09-02 Thread pwaring
Confirmed that this still definitely fails in a clean 16.04 VM. Other
composer commands work fine.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1595289

Title:
  composer validate can't find spdx-licenses.json

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/composer/+bug/1595289/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1768023] Re: Composer fails to run with PHP Fatal Error

2018-09-02 Thread pwaring
How did you install composer, was it via the Ubuntu package (`apt
install composer`) or via getcomposer.org?

I've just installed the composer package into a clean 18.04 VM and I can
run composer install, composer --version etc.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768023

Title:
  Composer fails to run with PHP Fatal Error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/composer/+bug/1768023/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1530204] Re: "composer create-project drupal/drupal hellodrupal 8.0.0" throws error

2018-09-02 Thread pwaring
Is this bug still valid? 15.10 has been unsupported for over two years
now and 18.04 has a more recent version of Composer (although still
behind upstream, which I'm hoping to fix with a Snap or PPA).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1530204

Title:
  "composer create-project drupal/drupal hellodrupal 8.0.0" throws error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/composer/+bug/1530204/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 798414] Re: update-initramfs should produce a more helpful error message when there isn't enough free space

2018-02-27 Thread pwaring
Liz: There are two options towards the top-right of the page, underneath
the list of bug duplicates:

Mute bug mail - Click this to stop any emails from this bug (you'll
remain subscribed so it will show in your list of bugs on Launchpad)

Edit bug mail - Click this to control which emails you get, e.g. you can
stop getting comments but continue to be notified of changes to the bug
status.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798414

Title:
  update-initramfs should produce a more helpful error message when
  there isn't enough  free space

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/initramfs-tools/+bug/798414/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1232016] Re: Can't scan from Brother ADS-2100

2017-05-03 Thread pwaring
Just as a head's up (since this is the first search result for 'ubuntu
ads-2100e'), this is still broken in 16.10 as well. I've tried reporting
a new bug using 'ubuntu-bug simple-scan' but I get an 'Invalid OpenID
transaction' error when my web browser opens.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232016

Title:
  Can't scan from Brother ADS-2100

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simple-scan/+bug/1232016/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1641380] Re: chromium-browser: ERR_CERTIFICATE_TRANSPARENCY_REQUIRED for Symantec certs

2016-11-16 Thread pwaring
Is there anything we can do as users to help get this fix pushed out?
Does it need to be tested?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641380

Title:
  chromium-browser: ERR_CERTIFICATE_TRANSPARENCY_REQUIRED for Symantec
  certs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1641380/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1205397] Re: encrypted install fails because unsafe swap (zram) is detected

2016-08-24 Thread pwaring
I'm running into this on Lubuntu 16.04.1 too - i386 and amd64 desktop
ISOs (downloaded yesterday). Tried on multiple machines with the same
results, but the workaround fixed the problem.

The error message is: "An unsafe swap space has been detected" (I
couldn't find this bug by copying + pasting the message).

This seems like a major bug to me - users can't install using one of the
options presented to them unless they run a terminal command manually. I
consider myself to be an advanced user and I managed to find the
workaround via a blog post, but I suspect people with less experience
will give up.

Is there a way of getting the bug importance increased (I don't think
Medium fully conveys the seriousness of "I can't install Lubuntu using
the wizard") and is there anything users can do to help get this fixed?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205397

Title:
  encrypted install fails because unsafe swap (zram) is detected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1205397/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1615579] Re: Vagrant fails to bring up xenial64 instance on VirtualBox

2016-08-22 Thread pwaring
I can't reproduce this on either of my Ubuntu machines, both of which
are running the same version of Vagrant and the Linux kernel.

What happens if you run 'vagrant box update' in the same directory as
the Vagrantfile? It could be that you are running an older box which
doesn't have this issue fixed (the official Vagrant boxes are updated
every few days).

For reference, the commands I ran were:

cd /tmp
vagrant init ubuntu/xenial64
vagrant up

I didn't have the ubuntu/xenial64 box installed, so it fetched the
latest version automatically the first time I ran vagrant up.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615579

Title:
  Vagrant fails to bring up xenial64 instance on VirtualBox

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vagrant/+bug/1615579/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1553666] Re: `validate_options': Missing required arguments: libvirt_uri (ArgumentError)

2016-03-06 Thread pwaring
What happens if you try the following (this will download a box from
vagrantcloud.com):

vagrant init ubuntu/trusty64
vagrant up

I know that box works, so if you still get the same problem then that
helps narrow it down.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553666

Title:
  `validate_options': Missing required arguments: libvirt_uri
  (ArgumentError)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vagrant/+bug/1553666/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1553666] Re: `validate_options': Missing required arguments: libvirt_uri (ArgumentError)

2016-03-06 Thread pwaring
Can you post the command you ran which resulted in the error message and
your Vagrantfile please?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553666

Title:
  `validate_options': Missing required arguments: libvirt_uri
  (ArgumentError)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vagrant/+bug/1553666/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1553666] Re: `validate_options': Missing required arguments: libvirt_uri (ArgumentError)

2016-03-06 Thread pwaring
What did you do to cause this error message?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553666

Title:
  `validate_options': Missing required arguments: libvirt_uri
  (ArgumentError)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vagrant/+bug/1553666/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1453463] Re: undefined symbol: FAMNoExists

2015-09-16 Thread pwaring
That workaround fixed the problem for me too - turns out the image I was
working with already had gamin installed. Purging gamin also removed
lighttpd, then re-installed lighttpd produced the following:

Setting up lighttpd (1.4.35-4ubuntu1) ...
Job for lighttpd.service failed. See "systemctl status lighttpd.service" and 
"journalctl -xe" for details.
invoke-rc.d: initscript lighttpd, action "start" failed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453463

Title:
  undefined symbol: FAMNoExists

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lighttpd/+bug/1453463/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1453463] Re: undefined symbol: FAMNoExists

2015-09-13 Thread pwaring
I'm unable to reproduce this problem on a clean install with no
configuration - installing lighttpd and then visiting http://localhost
brings up the default placeholder page.

What happens if you disable all your user-defined configuration files?
Can you get the basic placeholder page up?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453463

Title:
  undefined symbol: FAMNoExists

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lighttpd/+bug/1453463/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 69938] Re: Fluxbox background disappears on certain events

2014-08-03 Thread pwaring
I'm sorry, but I disagree - this *is* a bug, it involves unexpected
behaviour when running an application. That's either a bug with Fluxbox,
the application, or the interaction between the two.

However, if the fix is to pass extra arguments to the Nautilus command,
perhaps a simple way to close this bug would be to patch the file:
/etc/X11/fluxbox/fluxbox-menu, or the script which generates it? If that
was done, users would never come across the bug, which is a much better
experience than being pointed to a site where the solution is 'run the
nautilus command manually with some arguments, create a shell script or
patch Nautilus', none of which are particularly helpful to a new user.

I'm happy to submit a patch which does this, although it might take me a
week or two to work through the necessary bits of Fluxbox.

(As an aside, the Chrome argument doesn't really address this problem,
as I can leave Chrome in full screen mode and get back to the desktop as
it was. I cannot do that by quitting Nautilus, unless I run 'killall
nautilus', and even then the background image does not return to
normal.)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/69938

Title:
  Fluxbox background disappears on certain events

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fluxbox/+bug/69938/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 69938] Re: Fluxbox background disappears on certain events

2014-08-03 Thread pwaring
The Chrome argument does not address the problem that if I launch
Nautilus from the menu then I can no longer access the menu, even if I
quit Nautilus using the standard cross icon in the top right corner of
the window. Plus, even if I kill all the Nautilus processes, the
background image has still changed.

As I said, that may be a bug with Nautilus instead of Fluxbox, but
either way it breaks functionality and changes the user interface. I
can't see how that is anything other than a bug. Yes there are
workarounds like binding the RootMenu action or passing extra arguments
to Nautilus, but these things should not happen in the first place,
especially when the fix is to change how the menu is generated.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/69938

Title:
  Fluxbox background disappears on certain events

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fluxbox/+bug/69938/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 69938] Re: Fluxbox background disappears on certain events

2014-08-03 Thread pwaring
--no-background isn't a valid argument according to the man page (on
trusty).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/69938

Title:
  Fluxbox background disappears on certain events

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fluxbox/+bug/69938/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 69938] Re: Fluxbox background disappears on certain events

2014-08-02 Thread pwaring
** Also affects: fluxbox
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/69938

Title:
  Fluxbox background disappears on certain events

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fluxbox/+bug/69938/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1314252] Re: Wrong (en-us) keyboard layout is used in the logon screen

2014-08-02 Thread pwaring
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1240198 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1240198

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1240198
   Wrong keyboard layout active after booting into desktop

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314252

Title:
  Wrong (en-us) keyboard layout is used in the logon screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1314252/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 69938] Re: Fluxbox background disappears on certain events

2014-08-02 Thread pwaring
This problem is still occurring in Trusty, it's extremely frustrating as
the inability to get a menu up and running means no programs can be
launched other than through a terminal.

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install Ubuntu Desktop 14.04 from latest ISO image.
2. Install fluxbox using: sudo apt-get install fluxbox
3. Select Fluxbox from the list of window managers/desktop environments in the 
login screen.
4. Launch Nautilus (some other programs have the same effect).
5. Background changes to Ubuntu default wallpaper, can no longer right click to 
bring up Fluxbox menu.

I'm happy to help test any patches which attempt to fix this bug.

** Changed in: fluxbox (Ubuntu)
   Status: Expired = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/69938

Title:
  Fluxbox background disappears on certain events

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fluxbox/+bug/69938/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1111611] Re: Mysql distinct count returns wrong value in some circumstances

2013-02-02 Thread pwaring
I can confirm this bug occurs for me in 12.04 with the following mysql
version:

mysql  Ver 14.14 Distrib 5.5.29, for debian-linux-gnu (x86_64) using
readline 6.2

I did a bit of Googling and found this bug, which might be related:

http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=65053

The final comment suggests there may be a problem with composite indexes
- i.e. those consisting of more than one column. I took out both of the
indexes and created the table again, using the following SQL:

CREATE TABLE `testtab` (
  `foo` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `bar` char(3) NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`foo`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=151 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

Re-running the SELECT queries, I now get 111 returned. I tried creating
the table again, this time just deleting the idx_listfieldmashup index
(i.e. the composite one) and again got the results I expected.

I'm not sure why the composite index would cause this problem, but I
hope it's a good pointer for where to look further.

** Bug watch added: MySQL Bug System #65053
   http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=65053

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611

Title:
  Mysql distinct count returns wrong value in some circumstances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.5/+bug/611/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1001405] Re: on startup-ed pidgin's window does not restore

2012-10-04 Thread pwaring
I can confirm the fix in #6 works for me. Perhaps the Ubuntu package
should just have that option enabled by default as a temporary measure?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001405

Title:
  on startup-ed pidgin's window does not restore

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1001405/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 842566] Re: Libreoffice and unity integration broken.

2012-07-18 Thread pwaring
Is there anything we can do to help identify what the outstanding
problem is and get this bug fixed? Perhaps it's just that some of us are
running the 'wrong' package or haven't got the update yet (although I'm
running a standard 12.04 installation with no PPAs, all updates
installed etc.).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/842566

Title:
  Libreoffice and unity integration broken.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bamf/+bug/842566/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 842566] Re: Libreoffice and unity integration broken.

2012-07-16 Thread pwaring
I don't have any libreoffice3.4* packages installed and I'm experiencing
the same problem, seems to have surfaced in the past couple of days for
me (on an up to date 12.04, no PPAs). At present my only workaround is
to fire up an XP VM and read the spreadsheets in Excel.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/842566

Title:
  Libreoffice and unity integration broken.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bamf/+bug/842566/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 316441] Re: PHP session garbage collection

2011-09-26 Thread pwaring
Just to add as a comment to people suggesting editing php.ini, what you
should actually do is edit /etc/php5/conf.d/local.ini, as that will
override any php.ini settings without causing configuration conflicts
when you next upgrade PHP (apt will warn you that the file you are using
differs from that provided by the maintainer).

You can also override PHP values on a per-virtual host basis in Apache.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316441

Title:
  PHP session garbage collection

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/316441/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 316441] Re: PHP session garbage collection

2011-09-26 Thread pwaring
Just to add as a comment to people suggesting editing php.ini, what you
should actually do is edit /etc/php5/conf.d/local.ini, as that will
override any php.ini settings without causing configuration conflicts
when you next upgrade PHP (apt will warn you that the file you are using
differs from that provided by the maintainer).

You can also override PHP values on a per-virtual host basis in Apache.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316441

Title:
  PHP session garbage collection

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/316441/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 723603] Re: vsftpd no longer supports both anonymous_enable and local_enable

2011-09-14 Thread pwaring
Clicking the little edit icon next to the duplicate number and blanking
out the 'duplicate of' number field removes the duplicate relationship.
I think any logged in user can do this, although you might need a
certain amount of karma.

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 831907
   Default configuration file refers to nonexistent certificate

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723603

Title:
  vsftpd no longer supports both anonymous_enable and local_enable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/723603/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 723603] Re: vsftpd no longer supports both anonymous_enable and local_enable

2011-09-14 Thread pwaring
Clicking the little edit icon next to the duplicate number and blanking
out the 'duplicate of' number field removes the duplicate relationship.
I think any logged in user can do this, although you might need a
certain amount of karma.

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 831907
   Default configuration file refers to nonexistent certificate

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723603

Title:
  vsftpd no longer supports both anonymous_enable and local_enable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/723603/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 831907] [NEW] Default configuration file refers to nonexistent certificate

2011-08-23 Thread pwaring
Public bug reported:

The default configuration file for vsftpd (/etc/vsftpd.conf) in natty
contains the following line:

rsa_cert_file=/etc/ssl/private/vsftpd.pem

However, this file does not exist, so any attempt to enable SSL
(ssl_enable=YES) will cause the following error to be logged in
/var/log/syslog

[ multiple respawning lines ]
Aug 23 11:41:02 peladon init: vsftpd main process ended, respawning
Aug 23 11:41:02 peladon init: vsftpd main process (8733) terminated with status 
1
Aug 23 11:41:02 peladon init: vsftpd respawning too fast, stopped

This could be fixed in one of two ways:

1. Comment out the rsa_cert_file (it is uncommented by default) and add
a comment above it telling the user that they must supply the correct
filename before uncommenting.

2. Replace the rsa_cert_file line with the following two lines:
rsa_cert_file=/etc/ssl/certs/ssl-cert-snakeoil.pem
rsa_private_key_file=/etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key

These point to the default snakeoil certificate and private keys, which
are sufficient to get vsftpd up and running with SSL enabled.

lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 11.04
Release:11.04

apt-cache policy vsftpd
vsftpd:
  Installed: 2.3.2-3ubuntu4
  Candidate: 2.3.2-3ubuntu4
  Version table:
 *** 2.3.2-3ubuntu4 0
500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

** Affects: vsftpd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Summary changed:

- Default configuration file refers to non-existant certificate
+ Default configuration file refers to nonexistent certificate

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831907

Title:
  Default configuration file refers to nonexistent certificate

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/831907/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 831907] [NEW] Default configuration file refers to nonexistent certificate

2011-08-23 Thread pwaring
Public bug reported:

The default configuration file for vsftpd (/etc/vsftpd.conf) in natty
contains the following line:

rsa_cert_file=/etc/ssl/private/vsftpd.pem

However, this file does not exist, so any attempt to enable SSL
(ssl_enable=YES) will cause the following error to be logged in
/var/log/syslog

[ multiple respawning lines ]
Aug 23 11:41:02 peladon init: vsftpd main process ended, respawning
Aug 23 11:41:02 peladon init: vsftpd main process (8733) terminated with status 
1
Aug 23 11:41:02 peladon init: vsftpd respawning too fast, stopped

This could be fixed in one of two ways:

1. Comment out the rsa_cert_file (it is uncommented by default) and add
a comment above it telling the user that they must supply the correct
filename before uncommenting.

2. Replace the rsa_cert_file line with the following two lines:
rsa_cert_file=/etc/ssl/certs/ssl-cert-snakeoil.pem
rsa_private_key_file=/etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key

These point to the default snakeoil certificate and private keys, which
are sufficient to get vsftpd up and running with SSL enabled.

lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 11.04
Release:11.04

apt-cache policy vsftpd
vsftpd:
  Installed: 2.3.2-3ubuntu4
  Candidate: 2.3.2-3ubuntu4
  Version table:
 *** 2.3.2-3ubuntu4 0
500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

** Affects: vsftpd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Summary changed:

- Default configuration file refers to non-existant certificate
+ Default configuration file refers to nonexistent certificate

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831907

Title:
  Default configuration file refers to nonexistent certificate

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/831907/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 627565] Re: Twitter dropping support for basic auth

2010-09-04 Thread pwaring
A minor comment on upgrading - I could not add any more Twitter accounts
(or authorise my existing accounts) after an upgrade on Lucid.
Restarting my machine fixed the problem - perhaps gwibber-service was
not restarted automatically after the package had been upgraded?

-- 
Twitter dropping support for basic auth
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627565
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 627565] Re: Twitter dropping support for basic auth

2010-09-02 Thread pwaring
Is testing in a VM good enough (I don't want to enable proposed on my
main machine)? If so I will give it a whirl tonight on lucid.

-- 
Twitter dropping support for basic auth
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627565
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 627565] Re: Twitter dropping support for basic auth

2010-09-02 Thread pwaring
Confirmed working here on a clean (updated to latest packages)
installation of Lucid in a VM.

-- 
Twitter dropping support for basic auth
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627565
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 510296] Re: Virtualbox crashes when 64-bit extensions are enabled

2010-01-21 Thread pwaring
Marking this as invalid as it seems to be a general problem with
virtualisation software - VMWare Player freezes up the system in the
same way when virtualisation extensions are enabled.

** Changed in: virtualbox-ose (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
Virtualbox crashes when 64-bit extensions are enabled
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510296
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 510296] [NEW] Virtualbox crashes when 64-bit extensions are enabled

2010-01-20 Thread pwaring
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: virtualbox-ose

I have an Intel E6500 processor with virtualisation extensions in a
desktop with 4GB of RAM. I've tried creating 32 and 64 bit guests under
the latest (in the Karmic repositories anyway) version of VirtualBox OSE
and I find the following issues when running guests:

1. If I disable the virtualisation extensions in the BIOS, Virtualbox
will start 32 bit guests without any problems. However, I get an error
message about 64 bit support not being enabled if I try to run a 64 bit
guest.

2. If I enabled the virtualisation extensions, the entire system freezes
up (mouse and keyboard are unresponsive) whenever I try to launch a 32
or 64 bit guest, and the only way to resolve the problem is to press the
reset switch on the front of the machine.

The result I expect is for Virtualbox to run 32 and 64 bit guests when
the extensions are enabled, or at the very least not to freeze my entire
system.

I've run memtest without any errors, and everything else on the machine
seems to work, so I don't think it's a hardware issue.

Possibly useful system information (please ask if more is required):

lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 9.10
Release:9.10

apt-cache policy virtualbox-ose
virtualbox-ose:
  Installed: 3.0.8-dfsg-1ubuntu1
  Candidate: 3.0.8-dfsg-1ubuntu1
  Version table:
 *** 3.0.8-dfsg-1ubuntu1 0
500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/universe Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

uname -a
Linux mondas 2.6.31-17-generic #54-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 10 17:01:44 UTC 2009 
x86_64 GNU/Linux

** Affects: virtualbox-ose (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Virtualbox crashes when 64-bit extensions are enabled
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510296
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs