[Bug 439818] Re: epiphany-gecko can't be installed
I think the switch to Webkit is premature. Both browsers have severe customizability limitations, but at least Epiphany-gecko allowed to you tweak it with about:config. This bug is not invalid BTW, right now this is what you get when you try to install epiphany-gecko: # apt-get install epiphany-gecko Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: epiphany-gecko: Depends: epiphany-browser (>= 2.28.0) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages # sudo apt-get install epiphany-gecko epiphany-browser Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done epiphany-browser is already the newest version. Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: epiphany-browser: Conflicts: epiphany-gecko but 2.28.0-4ubuntu1 is to be installed E: Broken packages # The error messages don't make any sense whatsoever. It's one thing to say "We don't actually offer epiphany-gecko any more", but quite another to simply leave an entry enticingly in the repository (which will also break third party attempts to provide a usable version) which cannot be installed because of an error that clearly isn't an error (how is 2.28.0-4ubuntu1 not >= 2.28.0?) I've changed the status accordingly. Let's either fix the package or repair the dependency problems, not pretend there's no bug here simply because it peripherally involves an unsupported product - the repository itself most certainly is supported, and at the very minimum, that's broken. ** Changed in: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- epiphany-gecko can't be installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414560] Re: ath9k disassociates/reassociates a lot
Yeah, I'll add my name to those saying sudo apt-get install linux-backports-modules-wireless-karmic-generic fixes the problem, or at least tries to. Before I installed that and rebooted, Hulu.com was virtually unusable, and tail -f /var/log/syslog Nov 21 20:23:20 darkstar wpa_supplicant[1157]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS Nov 21 20:23:41 darkstar wpa_supplicant[1157]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED - Disconnect event - remove keys Nov 21 20:23:41 darkstar NetworkManager: (wlan1): supplicant connection state: completed -> disconnected Nov 21 20:23:41 darkstar kernel: [ 5871.484062] wlan1: no probe response from AP 00:01:02:03:04:05 - disassociating Nov 21 20:23:41 darkstar NetworkManager: (wlan1): supplicant connection state: disconnected -> scanning Nov 21 20:23:42 darkstar wpa_supplicant[1157]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS Nov 21 20:23:42 darkstar wpa_supplicant[1157]: WPS-AP-AVAILABLE Nov 21 20:23:48 darkstar wpa_supplicant[1157]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS Nov 21 20:23:48 darkstar wpa_supplicant[1157]: WPS-AP-AVAILABLE Nov 21 20:23:48 darkstar kernel: [ 5878.701142] wlan1: authenticate with AP 00:01:02:03:04:05 Nov 21 20:23:48 darkstar kernel: [ 5878.704549] wlan1: authenticated Nov 21 20:23:48 darkstar kernel: [ 5878.704556] wlan1: associate with AP 00:01:02:03:04:05 Nov 21 20:23:48 darkstar wpa_supplicant[1157]: Trying to associate with 00:01:02:03:04:05 (SSID='myapsid' freq=2412 MHz) Nov 21 20:23:48 darkstar wpa_supplicant[1157]: Association request to the driver failed Nov 21 20:23:48 darkstar NetworkManager: (wlan1): supplicant connection state: scanning -> associating Nov 21 20:23:48 darkstar wpa_supplicant[1157]: Associated with 00:01:02:03:04:05 Nov 21 20:23:48 darkstar wpa_supplicant[1157]: CTRL-EVENT-CONNECTED - Connection to 00:01:02:03:04:05 completed (reauth) [id =0 id_str=] Nov 21 20:23:48 darkstar NetworkManager: (wlan1): supplicant connection state: associating -> associated Nov 21 20:23:48 darkstar kernel: [ 5878.707771] wlan1: RX ReassocResp from 00:01:02:03:04:05 (capab=0x11 status=0 aid=5) Nov 21 20:23:48 darkstar kernel: [ 5878.707776] wlan1: associated Nov 21 20:23:48 darkstar NetworkManager: (wlan1): supplicant connection state: associated -> completed Since the reboot, I've watched the whole of Family Guy via Hulu.com without incident. So whatever's in those backports appears to have fixed this specific issue. -- ath9k disassociates/reassociates a lot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 359725] Re: Intrepid Network Manager Lacks Dial-up & Work-Around
Agreed. The same issue effectively prevents any easy way to access the Internet via a Bluetooth mobile phone and GPRS/EDGE. It took quite a bit of hacking around and scripting to get things working, and in the meantime I'm having that stupid "forcing Firefox offline" thing happening all the time. Why anyone thought removing dial-up support from NM would be a good idea is beyond me. -- Intrepid Network Manager Lacks Dial-up & Work-Around https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359725 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 307604] Re: hostname not IPv6 compliant
Further to the last comment, "options inet6" breaks ntp, so this isn't a workable solution given the importance of ntp in the Ubuntu set-up. -- hostname not IPv6 compliant https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307604 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 309738] [NEW] kadmind uses wrong path for kadmind.acl
Public bug reported:
In Ubuntu 8.04, Heimdal's kadmind daemon is compiled to look for
kadmind.acl in /var/lib/heimdal-kdc/kadmind.acl, but documentation and
the sample file locates it in /etc/heimdal-kdc/kadmind.acl
Location was verified using strace:
open("/var/lib/heimdal-kdc/kadmind.acl", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 5
For other users finding this bug, you can easily fix it either by
editing the file in /var/lib/heimdal-kdc/kadmind.acl, or by setting up a
softlink as follows:
sudo ln -s /etc/heimdal-kdc/kadmind.acl /var/lib/heimdal-
kdc/kadmind.acl
But presumably the long term fix is to either fix the man page, or
change the compiled-in default. Or, if you must, add the above softlink
as part of the install.
** Affects: heimdal (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
kadmind uses wrong path for kadmind.acl
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309738
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 309339] Re: kadmind will not listen on IPv6 ports
Do we need upstream to fix it or can I (or someone else) try and create a patch we can use locally until MIT does its thing? -- kadmind will not listen on IPv6 ports https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309339 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 309339] [NEW] kadmind will not listen on IPv6 ports
Public bug reported:
kadmind, as issued with Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, will not listen on IPv6 ports.
a netstat -l -p -6 will not show it as listening. kdc does not have the
same problem, it works fine.
Looking at the source code, it appears that the version of kadmind being
shipped with Ubuntu 8.04 LTS is not eyepeasixificationalized (!).
krb5-1.6.dfsg.3~beta1/src/kadmin/server/ovsec_kadmd.c defines a
structure, addr, which is the basic sockaddr_in rather than
sockaddr_in6, used to bind to the kerberos-adm port, and the code that
uses it is:
memset(&addr, 0, sizeof(addr));
addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
addr.sin_addr.s_addr = INADDR_ANY;
addr.sin_port = htons(params.kadmind_port);
if ((s = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0)) < 0) {
const char *e_txt = krb5_get_error_message (context, ret);
krb5_klog_syslog(LOG_ERR, "Cannot create TCP socket: %s",
e_txt);
fprintf(stderr, "Cannot create TCP socket: %s",
e_txt);
kadm5_destroy(global_server_handle);
krb5_klog_close(context);
exit(1);
}
if ((schpw = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0)) < 0) {
const char *e_txt = krb5_get_error_message (context, ret);
krb5_klog_syslog(LOG_ERR,
"cannot create simple chpw socket: %s",
e_txt);
fprintf(stderr, "Cannot create simple chpw socket: %s",
e_txt);
kadm5_destroy(global_server_handle);
krb5_klog_close(context);
exit(1);
}
There is no IPv6 code in the thing at all. I'm assuming there's no
elaborate include file somewhere that redefines sockaddr_in and AF_INET
to sockaddr_in6 and AF_INET6 respectively (and I don't know if such a
thing would work anyway, I'm reading conflicting documentation on
whether that would result in an IPv6-only app.)
Without this fixed, the remote admin daemon is essentially not useful on
a network that's primarily IPv6.
** Affects: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
kadmind will not listen on IPv6 ports
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309339
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 307604] Re: hostname not IPv6 compliant
After looking around, it appears the issue is "solved" if you put "options inet6" in the resolv.conf. Not sure why that would be necessary. Is this a policy decision? -- hostname not IPv6 compliant https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307604 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 307604] [NEW] hostname not IPv6 compliant
Public bug reported: The "hostname" command cannot determine the correct FQDN for the host if the host + domain only resolves as an IPv6 address. Example (the names have been changed to protect the innocent): r...@salamander:/etc# hostname -V hostname 2.94 r...@salamander:/etc# cat resolv.conf domain example.com search example.com nameserver 10.0.1.5 r...@salamander:/etc# host salamander.example.com salamander.example.com has IPv6 address 2002:::1:216:3eff:fe0e:f1f7 r...@salamander:/etc# hostname salamander r...@salamander:/etc# hostname -f hostname: No address associated with name The correct response would have been: salamander.example.com This is a problem because a large number of scripts rely upon hostname to determine the local machine's FQDN. Right now it's only solvable using tricks for DNS, which in many cases are undesirable. For example, I do not want salamander.example.com to resolve to a 10.x.x.x address, because 10.x.x.x is not globally routable, and because example.com is a real domain that's externally visible and DNS becomes seriously messy if you have to mix a "real" DNS for external use and a fake DNS for internal use. Whatever the case, hostname should be happy with an IPv6 address. hostname 2.94 is bundled with Ubuntu 8.04 LTS. ** Affects: hostname (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- hostname not IPv6 compliant https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307604 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
