[Bug 1901408] [NEW] wolfssl 4.5.0+dfsg-2 crashes starting wesnoth 1.14.13

2020-10-25 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Public bug reported: See also https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970520 downgrading to libwolfssl24_4.3.0+dfsg-2 solves the crash ** Affects: wolfssl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1866611] Re: OpenVPN w. SHA1 signed CA broken after upgrade to 1.1.1d-2ubuntu6

2020-04-20 Thread staedtler-przyborski
With openssl 1.1.1f-1ubuntu1 Qvpn from Qnap works again, so this bug can be closed IMHO. Neverthertheless I would prefer companies/producers of VPN solutions fix and update their signatures (shouldn't be a rocket-science). In my company I stay with PiVPN (instead of QVNP) seems more secure,

[Bug 1866611] Re: OpenVPN w. SHA1 signed CA broken after upgrade to 1.1.1d-2ubuntu6

2020-04-06 Thread staedtler-przyborski
As a quick addition for the QVPN app on a Qnap NAS in our network I just installed a Raspberry 3 with PiVpn (pivpn.io) configured for OpenVPN, as I'm in doubt Qnap will release an updated QVpn just in Time ... Works like a charm and installation is super easy. With at least one connection it

[Bug 1779827] Re: failure to boot with linux-image-4.15.0-24-generic

2018-07-04 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Gratulations to Joseph Salisbury the test kernel works like a charm My Lenovo T520 boots rather quick without having haveged installed. Thanks for this quick fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1779827] Re: failure to boot with linux-image-4.15.0-24-generic

2018-07-04 Thread staedtler-przyborski
According to this page https://debianforum.de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=33=169585=entropie This newly introduced fix in 4.15.0-24 is the cause 'random: fix crng_ready() test' when it's reverted (like in debian 4.9.88-1+deb9u1) boot is fine again 'linux (4.9.88-1+deb9u1) stretch-security;

[Bug 1779827] Re: failure to boot with linux-image-4.15.0-24-generic

2018-07-04 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Have a look at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=897631 it seems the kernel update breaks gdm ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #897631 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=897631 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1779827] Re: failure to boot with linux-image-4.15.0-24-generic

2018-07-04 Thread staedtler-przyborski
As no trick mentioned here worked ... I made a fresh install and updated everything except the kernel (which remains at 4.15.0-20). And my Lenovo T 520 works again. So indeed kernel 4.15.0-24 seems the culprit. No glue why booting to previous installed kernels doesn't work either as soon

[Bug 1779827] Re: failure to boot with linux-image-4.15.0-24-generic

2018-07-03 Thread staedtler-przyborski
@ #12 No booting to previous kernels (4.15.0-23 or -20) doesn't solve the problem, also removing 4.15.0-24 doesn't help here. I'm in doubt it's a kernel problem. If you do a little research you'll find that this issue (Started gnome display manager. dispatcher service .. tem changes.pp link

[Bug 1779827] Re: Started gnome display manager. dispatcher service

2018-07-03 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Here too on my Thinkpad T520. Happens also on a complete fresh install after applying latest updates from today Curiously my home-build computer (using also intel-graphics) works without any problem ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2018-03-07 Thread staedtler-przyborski
A first test with Ubuntu 18.04 and my Epson V 300 showed: Things remain the same as with 17.10. Only after the steps described in post #76 my scanner began to work. Btw. the opinion of the sane developers I talked with is rather clear and easy: those who broke things have to fix them. -- You

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-12-14 Thread staedtler-przyborski
And please don't omit the permissions problem which occurs IMHO with all iscan, brscan4 and some smfb* based scanners. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707352 Title: the change from

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-12-14 Thread staedtler-przyborski
As im in contact with Olaf Meeuwissen (Sane developer and former Epson developer, responsible for iscan, imagescan, and now utsushi) ... He told between the lines that he's quite sure that no manufacturer will correct his packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-12-13 Thread staedtler-przyborski
@ marcelpaulo have a look at comment #94 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-12-04 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Try another USB -Port, (no USB 3 whenever possible), check USB cables, check if the file 'iscan' is in 'etc/sane.d/dll.d/ content: 'epkowa' edit '/etc/sane.d/dll.conf' comment all entries by adding '#' in front of every line add 'epkowa' (uncommented !) edit '/etc/sane.d/epkowa.conf' comment

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-12-04 Thread staedtler-przyborski
If 1)'ls /usr/lib/sane/*' shows: /usr/lib/sane/libsane-epkowa.la/usr/lib/sane/libsane-epkowa.so.1.0.15 /usr/lib/sane/libsane-epkowa.so.1 then a 2)'sudo ln -sfr /usr/lib/sane/libsane-epkowa* /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sane' is the cure for your scanner hickups ... If not, you first need to

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-12-04 Thread staedtler-przyborski
@ Ken Wright looks okay so far finally output of 'ls /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sane/libsane-epkowa*' and 'ls /etc/udev/rules.d/*.rules' -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-12-03 Thread staedtler-przyborski
@ Ken Wright You know this is not a helpdesk ? open a terminal and paste 'apt list --installed |grep -e esci -e iscan -e libsane1' this shows your installed Sane backends (libsane1) and your iscan installion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-12-03 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Output(s) seem fine have you installed http://support.epson.net/linux/en/iscan.php?model=perfection-v370=1.0.1 ß I guess so but for beeing sure ... Also sane-backends (1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2.1) artful ? I ask so much because in comment 21 the epson V-370 is told to be working. So it

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-12-03 Thread staedtler-przyborski
@ Ken Wright As starting point: output of 'lsusb' and 'sudo sane-find-scanner' 'scanimage -L' please -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-21 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Congratulations, great work Luca. And big relief ... So I summarize the workarounds as follows (no need to crawl through this lengthy bug report): I.Brother: 1. brscan, brscan2, brscan3 a) 'sudo ln -sfr /usr/lib64/libbr* /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu' b) 'sudo ln -sfr

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-20 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Hi Luca, can you please remove /etc/udev/rules.d/60-brother-libsane-type1.rules completly ? and add instead /etc/udev/rules.d/79-udev-brother.rules (see attach) Don't worry about the 0777 (as long you posess your computer ;-). We can later try to reduce permissions (but 0666 makes no real

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-19 Thread staedtler-przyborski
@Luca Bingo udevadm test /devices/pci:00/:00:1d.7/usb2/2-4' shows: 'Invalid rule /etc/udev/rules.d/60-brother-libsane-type1.rules:17: unknown key 'SYSFS{idVendor}' So consequently your device is configured as printer-only: RUN '/lib/udev/tlp-usb-udev %p'

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-18 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Hi Luca, In your diff.sane.txt I've found these two entries (problem seems related to settings of c189:130) : < openat(AT_FDCWD, "/run/udev/data/c189:130", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 33 < fstat(33, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=670, ...}) = 0 < fstat(33, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=670, ...}) = 0

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-16 Thread staedtler-przyborski
I have no idea what 'more-magic' xsane uses, as simple magic of root using scanimage isn't sufficient. as your diff shows no success, only 'permission denied' the cause of the failure can't be identified ... maybe a 'export SANE_DEBUG_DLL=128' As user 'strace xsane 2>strace.user.log' As root

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-16 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Sorry As root also only (no -L) 'strace xsane 2>strace.root.log' -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-15 Thread staedtler-przyborski
@ luca could you do the following ? 'export SANE_DEBUG_DLL=128' As user 'strace scanimage -L 2>strace.user.log' As root 'strace scanimage -L 2>strace.root.log' Finally 'diff strace.user.log strace.root.log' And show us the diff ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-15 Thread staedtler-przyborski
@Matt_H Sorry, I should have asked first: Are you on 32 or 64 bit ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-15 Thread staedtler-przyborski
@Matt_H Please install this plugin https://download2.ebz.epson.net/iscan/plugin/gt-f720/deb/x64/iscan- gt-f720-bundle-1.0.1.x64.deb.tar.gz Then continue with #36 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-10 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Hi Luca can you try /etc/udev/rules.d/99-local.rules SUBSYSTEM!="usb_device", ACTION!="add", GOTO="_end" # For BROTHER MFC-1910W SYSFS{idVendor}=="04f9", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k",OWNER="root",GROUP="scanner",MODE="0660" LABEL="_end" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-08 Thread staedtler-przyborski
@luca What did I tell you How about a debugging session ;-) Open your terminal and paste: 'export SANE_DEBUG_DLL=255' then try sane-find-scanner (with/without sudo) scanimage -L (with/without sudo) Xsane (with/without sudo) also as root show us the results. -- You received

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-06 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Dear Jeremy But be assured that I know Sane since a very long time (have a look at my sane frontend Tame/2 for OS/2, anybody remebers ? It was the first and only OS/2 scanning application supporting USB thanks to Maeda Haruyuki- a japanese developer). I remember debugging sessions with Osaka

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-11-05 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Please use the workaround for Epson Iscan, Brother brscan,brscan2 and brscan3 Scanners from here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane- backends/+bug/1728012/comments/36 brscan4 no luck until now -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-05 Thread staedtler-przyborski
'I have written to Brother support' Nothing will happen. As only Ubuntu 17.10 is affected, no other Ubuntu- Release, no other Linux-Distribution (e.g. Arch-Linux uses libsane 1.0.27 and no extra pecularities are reported) . Hopefully Ubuntu switches at least for 18.04 LTS back to use non-

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-05 Thread staedtler-przyborski
As I've found now the origin of '/etc/udev/rules.d/79-udev-epson.rules' - it was installed by the epson-printer-utility for my Epson XP 540 - I tried what happens when I switch to a more 'common' udev rule. I tried (similiar to the rule for brother scanners provided by Hans):

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-05 Thread staedtler-przyborski
At the moment I see only two possibilities Try vuescan https://www.hamrick.com/ or try Hans Schwimmbecks 'ugly' workaround https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane- backends/+bug/1707352/comments/35 Debian recently released libsane1 1.0.27-1~experimental3 (hope never dies ;-) Changelog

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-04 Thread staedtler-przyborski
@luca.mg Im sorry to hear that. BTW. Are you on wayland or xorg. If wayland, have you tried with xorg ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-04 Thread staedtler-przyborski
@luca.mg Are you aware of these informations ? http://stepsilon.com/ubuntu/install-scanner-brother-dcp-7055-ubuntu "The Brother Linux scanner driver works only with a superuser by default, as noted on the brother solutions site. If you want to allow normal users to also use the scanner, this

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-04 Thread staedtler-przyborski
I have no glue why Epson has chosen '0777', maybe it's because they upload a firmware to their scanners ... Actual summary: 1.Brother: brscan4 no luck until now (btw. the installer already seems to respect /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sane) brscan, brscan2, brscan3 a) 'sudo ln -sfr

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-04 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Dear Hans could you please test if a more generic solution like the one provided by Epson would also work for local attached Brother Scanners ? A possible Example: # chmod device BROTHER group ATTRS{manufacturer}=="BROTHER", DRIVERS=="usb", SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", ATTRS{idVendor}=="04f9",

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-03 Thread staedtler-przyborski
In the meanwhile I had a look on different brscan drivers ... Unfortunately brscan4 has a complete different structure (so at least one real user is needed) Summary is now: 1. Brother brscan, brscan2, brscan 3 a) 'sudo ln -sfr /usr/lib64/libbr* /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu' b) 'sudo ln -sfr

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-03 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Thanks Mariusz. Can you please specify which files are in /usr/lib/sane (just to make the command below more precise) ? To summarize we have now the following workarounds (all 64-bit): 1. Brother brscan3 a) 'sudo ln -sfr /usr/lib64/libbrscandec* /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu' b) 'sudo ln -sfr

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-03 Thread staedtler-przyborski
@ Hans Schwimmbeck Great, so we have a fix for brother brscan3 scanners too. Ah yes, linking is definitely a better way than copying (you may forgive me, my workaround was only a first try). Now we only need to know if, brscan, brscan2 and brscan4 scanners can be fixed too by linking

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-11-02 Thread staedtler-przyborski
@Michael Barraclough Is it a fresh install ? If yes, I'm sorry I'm not familiar with Kubuntu If no, please consider a fresh installation of Kubuntu 17.10 (too many things have changed since 16.04) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-11-02 Thread staedtler-przyborski
@Michael Barraclough Are you on 32 bit ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707352 Title: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug- ins for sane To

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-11-01 Thread staedtler-przyborski
I verified that my Epson V300 works with a fresh Ubuntu 17.10 installation by doing the following steps 1. Install libsane1 1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2.1 If you don't want to enable the proposed repository the easiest way is to download the files and install them from local

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-01 Thread staedtler-przyborski
A Test here showed: without 79-udev-epson.rules in /etc/udev/rules.d only 'sudo scanimage -L works' with 79-udev-epson.rules in /etc/udev/rules.d no root needed, a simple 'scanimage -L' is sufficient maybe for the brscan scanners also only the udev rule is missing try to add # Brother

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-11-01 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Do you have really copied the content of /usr/lib64/sane/ to /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sane ? Whats with 79-udev-epson.rules in /etc/udev/rules.d ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-11-01 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Please try 'sudo scanimage -L' if scanimage succeeds and finds the scanner check if you have a file named 79-udev-epson.rules in /etc/udev/rules.d If yes content: If no it should have the following content: # chmod device EPSON group ATTRS{manufacturer}=="EPSON", DRIVERS=="usb",

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-01 Thread staedtler-przyborski
X-Org or wayland doens't matter. My scanner works with both (verfied). Do you have a file named 79-udev-epson.rules in /etc/udev/rules.d ? Mine has the following content: # chmod device EPSON group # ACTION=="add", ATTRS{manufacturer}=="EPSON", DRIVERS=="usb", SUBSYSTEMS=="usb",

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-11-01 Thread staedtler-przyborski
If you don't want to enable the proposed repository the easiest way is to download the files and install them from local https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/artful/+upload/16734103/+files/libsane1_1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-01 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Are on x-org or wayland ? Can you try what happens if you switch to X-org ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-11-01 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Can you try it as root ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707352 Title: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug- ins for sane To manage notifications

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-01 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Thats interesting. I don't need to be root to scan. So whats different is the question ? I don't believe it's the different plugin. Iscan is identical I suppose. Just for completeness: apt list --installed |grep -e esci -e iscan -e libsane -e sane-utils WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-01 Thread staedtler-przyborski
BRScan users can you try what happens when copy the files (libsane- brother*) from /usr/lib64/sane/ to /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sane. Maybe the fix for brother scanners is as easy as the one for the epson ones ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-11-01 Thread staedtler-przyborski
BRScan users can you try what happens when you copy the files (libsane- brother*) from /usr/lib64/sane/ to /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sane. Maybe the fix for brother scanners is as easy as the one for the epson ones ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-11-01 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Just for the record scanimage -L device `epkowa:interpreter:003:007' is a Epson Perfection V300 flatbed scanner device `imagescan:esci:networkscan://192.168.50.24:1865' is a Epson XP-540 Iscan, simple-scan, Xsane are working as expected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-01 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Just for the record scanimage -L device `epkowa:interpreter:003:007' is a Epson Perfection V300 flatbed scanner device `imagescan:esci:networkscan://192.168.50.24:1865' is a Epson XP-540 Iscan, simple-scan, Xsane are working as expected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-11-01 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Today I managed to bring back my dead Epson V300 alive :-) 1. Install libsane1 1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2.1 2. Install iscan-gt-f720-bundle-1.0.1.x64.deb.tar.gz 3. Copy (or move) the files from /usr/lib/sane (libsane-epkowa.la, libsane-epkowa.so.1, libsane-epkowa.so.1.0.15 in my case) to

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-11-01 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Today I managed to bring back my dead Epson V300 alive :-) 1. Install libsane1 1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2.1 2. Install iscan-gt-f720-bundle-1.0.1.x64.deb.tar.gz 3. Copy (or move) the files from /usr/lib/sane (libsane-epkowa.la, libsane-epkowa.so.1, libsane-epkowa.so.1.0.15 in my case) to

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-10-29 Thread staedtler-przyborski
True Epson iscan .deb's can be installed now. But nevertheless Epson scanners relying on iscan refuse to work (Epson V300 in my case). scanimage -L doesn't detect them, neither iscan, simple-scan or xsane. This is less than half a fix. BTW. in Ubuntu 17.04 the scanner worked with libsane

[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

2017-10-27 Thread staedtler-przyborski
I can confirm that the Epson Perfection V300 is also affected Using libsane1 1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2.1 allows me to install the drivers without conflicts. But the scanner is not recognized. Neither by scanimage, simple-scan or iscan lsusb shows that the scanner is attached lsusb Bus 002

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-10-23 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Scanning using a HP Officejet Pro 476 attached via network works with libsane1 (proved with simple-scan) scanimage -L device `hpaio:/net/hp_officejet_pro_x476dw_mfp?ip=192.168.200.43=false' is a Hewlett-Packard hp_officejet_pro_x476dw_mfp all-in-one -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-10-22 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Many thanks to everybody who tries to fix this. IMHO Things go wrong, but keep in mind 17.10 lives for 9 months, so no real tragedy. Quite more important is that 18.04 LTS will work out-of- box. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-10-21 Thread staedtler-przyborski
In the meanwhile I discovered: The Epson XP-540 Scanner-part is identical to the Standalone Epson V39 Scanner. For the V39 the plugin-gt-s650 comes in two flavours: As fully functional imagescan plugin, which doesn't have libsane as dependency and as non-functional iscan plugin which relys on

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-10-21 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Epson XP-540 attached locally also works (tested with simple-scan) scanimage -L device `imagescan:esci:networkscan://192.168.50.24:1865' is a Epson XP-540 device `imagescan:esci:usb:/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:14.0/usb3/3-8/3-8:1.0' is a EPSON XP-540_Series It uses the

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-10-21 Thread staedtler-przyborski
My Epson XP-540 works. Curiously with simple-scan and with xsane, but not with Imagescan provided by Epson. But thats another problem, image-scan scans but can't save the scanned image ... With Ubuntu 17.04 (using Sane 1.0.25) behaviour of imagescan was identical. I already reported this

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-10-20 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Just for the record. When installing iscan and esci-interpreter-gt-f720 using 'sudo dpkg -i --force-depends', they get installed. But my Epson V300 is not recognized. When I start 'scanimage -L' only my Epson XP-540 networkscanner is found, not my local attached Epson V300 scanimage -L device

[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane

2017-10-19 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Im sorry but https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane- backends/1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2 doesn't solve the problem. This is what I get when I want to install my Epson V300 (sorry comments are in german, but I'm sure you understand what goes wrong: libsane is missing): Hinweis: »libsane1«

[Bug 1018069] Re: Linux Libertine Libreoffice 3.5 distorted printing

2012-10-17 Thread staedtler-przyborski
You may want to know using Linux Libertine O 5.3 OTF or TTF doesn't solve the distored printing. Also Libreoffice 3.6.0.2 (latest available for Ubuntu 12.0) doesn't change anything for this bug (or abend, or issue, as you like) BTW. Abiword is not affected, documents from there using Linux

[Bug 1018069] Re: Linux Libertine Libreoffice 3.5 distorted printing

2012-10-15 Thread staedtler-przyborski
I've tested now a document (see attach) with Ubuntu 12.04 and libreoffice 3.5.4 and linux libertine O 5.1.3 with different printers HP officejet 6100: OK (inkjet using PCL as language) HP Officejet 8000 OK (inkjet using PCL as language) Brother MFC 8640N FAIL (Laser using PS as language) Kyocera

[Bug 1018069] Re: Linux Libertine Libreoffice 3.5 distorted printing

2012-10-15 Thread staedtler-przyborski
** Attachment removed: Parkett.odt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1018069/+attachment/3398722/+files/Parkett.odt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1018069

[Bug 1018069] Re: Linux Libertine Libreoffice 3.5 distorted printing

2012-10-15 Thread staedtler-przyborski
+ Could you please take a picture of the offending printout and attach to this report? Later this evening I provide a scanned printout. Sorry had to delete my second example - too much private information ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1018069] Re: Linux Libertine Libreoffice 3.5 distorted printing

2012-10-15 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Attached is example.png a scan of two printouts (Laser Kyocera FS C5025 versus Ink HP officejet 8000) for direct comparing ** Attachment added: example.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1018069/+attachment/3399095/+files/example.png -- You received this bug

[Bug 1018069] Re: Linux Libertine Libreoffice 3.5 distorted printing

2012-10-15 Thread staedtler-przyborski
attached is example.odt (same as parkett.odt from #11 but without privacy informations) which was used for printout. ** Attachment added: example.odt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1018069/+attachment/3399096/+files/example.odt -- You received this bug

[Bug 1018069] Re: Linux Libertine Libreoffice 3.5 distorted printing

2012-10-15 Thread staedtler-przyborski
+ I'm interested in how you found this. Could you please explain how you found that LO uses the graphite engine with the font Linux Libertine O? It's pure intuition ;-). More serious : after I've found out that Libertine G (with Graphite) works, Libertine O (without Graphite) doesn't and LO

[Bug 1018069] Re: Linux Libertine Libreoffice 3.5 distorted printing

2012-10-12 Thread staedtler-przyborski
I've tested a document now at home with both Ubuntu 12.04 and libreoffice 3.5.4 (up-do-date with proposed), Ubuntu 12.10 and libreoffice 3.6.2rc2 (up-to-date with proposed), printer was a HP Officejet 6100. In both cases printout using Libertine O (the non graphite version of the font, installed

[Bug 1061598] Re: No/slow appearing global menu in Unity

2012-10-06 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Similar happens with libreoffice 3.6.2 rc2. After quickly opening/closing/opening any Libreoffice application /writer/calc/impress ... the menuebar is visible (in 3.6.1 it was not, so situation gets better ;-) but it doens't work, also keyboard shortcut's don't ... After closing an

[Bug 1018069] Re: Linux Libertine Libreoffice 3.5 distorted printing

2012-09-24 Thread staedtler-przyborski
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected precise running-unity ** Description changed: Linux Libertine 5.1.3 and Libreoffice 3.5.x (I've tested 3.5.3 and 3.5.4) don't play well together. On screen everthing looks nice, but on printout the distances between the letters are

[Bug 1018069] Re: Linux Libertine Libreoffice 3.5 distorted printing

2012-09-24 Thread staedtler-przyborski
example document which shows distortion when printed attached ** Attachment added: Urlaubsvertretung 4-2012.odt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1018069/+attachment/3337618/+files/Urlaubsvertretung%204-2012.odt -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1018069] [NEW] Linux Libertine Libreoffice 3.5 distorted printing

2012-06-26 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Public bug reported: Linux Libertine 5.1.3 and Libreoffice 3.5.x (I've tested 3.5.3 and 3.5.4) don't play well together. On screen everthing looks nice, but on printout the distances between the letters are completly distored. The printout is hard to read and looks ugly. I've seen this on all our

[Bug 972465] Re: 1.0.0 can't connect as administrator on w2k server

2012-05-30 Thread staedtler-przyborski
This bug got finally solved by freerpd 1.0.1-1ubuntu2.1 and remmina 1.0.0-1ubuntu6.1 Thanks folks and anybody involved -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/972465 Title: 1.0.0 can't

[Bug 972465] Re: 1.0.0 can't connect as administrator on w2k server

2012-05-30 Thread staedtler-przyborski
** Changed in: remmina (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/972465 Title: 1.0.0 can't connect as administrator on w2k server To manage

[Bug 972465] Re: 1.0.0 can't connect as administrator on w2k server

2012-05-02 Thread staedtler-przyborski
As downgrading remmina 1.0.0-1ubuntu5 didn't help anything. I digged a little deeper and found now what causes the refuse of a connection. Whenever I successfully connect with freerpd as administrator on w2k and then disconnect, freerpd doesn't disconnect properly. So the connection stays open

[Bug 972465] Re: 1.0.0 can't connect as administrator on w2k server

2012-04-26 Thread staedtler-przyborski
It drives me nuts (not knowing what did the fix): after applying all updates to precise until today, including those from proposed I can connect as administrator - no installed fix was directly related to remminna or freerpd . My strong guess now is that it somehow had to do with the usage of

[Bug 972465] Re: 1.0.0 can't connect as administrator on w2k server

2012-04-26 Thread staedtler-przyborski
And now, after applying remmina 1.0.0-1ubuntu6 from proposed the bug is back :-( Console output from remmina: Remmina plugin VNC (type=Protokoll) registered. Remmina plugin VNCI (type=Protokoll) registered. Remmina plugin RDP (type=Protokoll) registered. Remmina plugin RDPF (type=Datei)

[Bug 988465] Re: smc refuses to start cause directory campaings is missing

2012-04-25 Thread staedtler-przyborski
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 947358 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947358 Sorry reporting too fast, did't find bug 947358 earlier -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988465

[Bug 988465] [NEW] smc refuses to start cause directory campaings is missing

2012-04-25 Thread staedtler-przyborski
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 947358 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947358 Public bug reported: When I copy the contents of directory /usr/share/games/smc/worlds to the newly generated directory 'campaings' in /usr/share/games/smc, secret mario cronicle (smc) starts and works as

[Bug 972465] Re: 1.0.0 can't connect as administrator on w2k server

2012-04-10 Thread staedtler-przyborski
I've tried now grdesktop (unfortunaetly gtk 2) which uses rdesktop for rdp connections instead of freerpd. Everything fine there, so I suppose it's a bug with freerpd. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 972463] Re: changed windows color theme in 1.0.0

2012-04-10 Thread staedtler-przyborski
I've tried now grdesktop (unfortunaetly gtk 2) which uses rdesktop for rdp connections instead of freerpd. Everything fine there, so I suppose it's a bug with freerpd. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 972463] [NEW] changed windows color theme in 1.0.0

2012-04-03 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Public bug reported: In remmina 1.0.0 connecting to a windows 2000 server via RPD the color theme changes from default (previous remmina versions like in oneiric ocelot didn't the used the color scheme of the server). Maybe thats a feature ... but then it should be declared somewhere ... **

[Bug 972460] [NEW] wrong version number 09.99.1 in info

2012-04-03 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Public bug reported: The version number displayed should be 1.0.0 ** Affects: remmina (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/972460

[Bug 972465] [NEW] 1.0.0 can't connect as administrator on w2k server

2012-04-03 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Public bug reported: Maybe thats a 'security-feature' ... I'm unable to connect to a w2k server as administrator with remmina 1.0.0. Connection closes instantaniously. Previous versions allowed such (and it was very handy, cause I'm lazy and don't want to walk to the physical place of the

[Bug 972463] Re: changed windows color theme in 1.0.0

2012-04-03 Thread staedtler-przyborski
** Description changed: In remmina 1.0.0 connecting to a windows 2000 server via RPD the color theme changes from default (previous remmina versions like in oneiric - ocelot didn't the used the color scheme of the server). Maybe thats a + ocelot didn't, they used the color scheme of the

[Bug 972465] Re: 1.0.0 can't connect as administrator on w2k server

2012-04-03 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Tell me what informations are needed I'll try to collect all. Aeh yes I wanted to to connect via RPD -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/972465 Title: 1.0.0 can't connect as administrator

[Bug 972463] Re: changed windows color theme in 1.0.0

2012-04-03 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Please tell me what informations are needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/972463 Title: changed windows color theme in 1.0.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 937961] Re: Application needs hi-res or SVG icon

2012-04-01 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Can't understand the 'noise', as remmina has in it's sources already a remmina.svg (see attach) even when scaling it 2000% (should be large enough ;-) no pixelation at all. Sorry I would have done it (the remmina.svg icon), but as it already exists: why inventing the wheel again ... ? **

[Bug 873247] Re: 11.10 wintv-nova t regression

2011-11-14 Thread staedtler-przyborski
According to this log kernel 3.0.9 should contain a fix for the regression http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/ChangeLog-3.0.9 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873247 Title:

[Bug 873247] Re: 11.10 wintv-nova t regression

2011-11-14 Thread staedtler-przyborski
I'm sorry to tell that I can't verify if kernel 3.0.9 solves the regression or not. As the stick showed the same errors after installing kernel 3.0.9 as mainline build, I've done a crosscheck with Ubuntu 11.04 (where the stick always worked). Even there no frontend attached. Seems the stick

[Bug 873247] Re: 11.10 wintv-nova t regression

2011-10-23 Thread staedtler-przyborski
Fedora from Redhat is affected too, and has integrated fixes for testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733827 for the fixes see http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input- infrastructure/36393 ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #733827

[Bug 873247] Re: 11.10 wintv-nova t regression

2011-10-18 Thread staedtler-przyborski
As bugzilla.kernel.org continues to be unreachable I've sent a mail to Patrick Boettcher at dibcom France who developed the dib0700 module. Hopefully he's gone have a look on it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

  1   2   >