[Bug 999411] [NEW] install fails when using btrfs with only one partition and installing grub to the MBR
Public bug reported: installing to a single partition and installing the bootloader on the MBR os /dev/sda instead of the first partition using btrfs if that makes any diference . ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: ubiquity 2.10.16 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu5 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.315 Date: Mon May 14 18:08:26 2012 InstallCmdLine: file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash -- maybe-ubiquity LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 (20120425) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 TERM=linux PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SourcePackage: grub-installer UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: grub-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise ubiquity-2.10.16 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999411 Title: install fails when using btrfs with only one partition and installing grub to the MBR To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/999411/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 999411] Re: install fails when using btrfs with only one partition and installing grub to the MBR
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999411 Title: install fails when using btrfs with only one partition and installing grub to the MBR To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/999411/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 925296] [NEW] 11.10 fails to boot from usb with Boot Error
Public bug reported: I downloaded ubuntu-11.10-desktop-amd64.iso and attempted to make a bootable USB drive to install it with. I used two different (both new) USB drives and tried with both usb-creator-gtk and unetbootin to boot both a desktop and a laptop. in all cases I simply get a black screen with Boot Error before grub starts. I also tried creating the image with 11.10 and 11.04 one clue is that I see this message on (only) one of the systems I tried to use to create the image [ 4680.880167] echo 0 /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs disables this message. [ 4680.880173] syslinuxD 0 8179 8109 0x [ 4680.880185] 88001b451cc8 0086 88001b451fd8 88001b45 [ 4680.880196] 00013d00 88009b1e4858 88001b451fd8 00013d00 [ 4680.880207] 88012e542dc0 88009b1e44a0 88001b451ca8 7fff [ 4680.880217] Call Trace: [ 4680.880234] [815c7d4d] schedule_timeout+0x26d/0x2e0 [ 4680.880246] [81057613] ? update_curr+0x103/0x210 [ 4680.880254] [81057d56] ? check_preempt_wakeup+0x1b6/0x280 [ 4680.880262] [815c7809] wait_for_common+0xd9/0x180 [ 4680.880271] [8105f600] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20 [ 4680.880281] [8118fed0] ? sync_one_sb+0x0/0x30 [ 4680.880288] [815c798d] wait_for_completion+0x1d/0x20 [ 4680.880296] [8118a587] writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x77/0xa0 [ 4680.880304] [8118a5d1] writeback_inodes_sb+0x21/0x30 [ 4680.880312] [8118fe89] __sync_filesystem+0x49/0x90 [ 4680.880322] [8118feef] sync_one_sb+0x1f/0x30 [ 4680.880326] [81168031] iterate_supers+0x81/0xf0 [ 4680.880329] [8118fdf0] sync_filesystems+0x20/0x30 [ 4680.880332] [8118ff87] sys_sync+0x17/0x40 [ 4680.880343] [8100c002] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b at approximatly the same time I made the image. This bug was made from an ask Ubuntu question reproduced below: - Dear sorry for my bad english. i am trying to install ubuntu 11.10 Desktop amd 64 i have done all the steps what i had guided by ubuntu web. when i start boot from USB its say boot error :( . i have downloaded 3 diffrent types of ubuntu. Tried all but same problem i have found. 1) UBUNTU 11.10 DESKTOP AMD 64 2) UBUNTU 11.10 DESKTOP I386 3) UBUNTU 10.04 DESKTOP I386 but in all versions i found the same problem. i am using INTEL D946GZIS 1.8 CORE 2 PRO 2 GB RAM 80 GB ID H.D.D I hope you can help me so i am contacting you. plz Guide me which version i should use for my system and how should i install properly. Thank you in advance Regards Muzaffar khan ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925296 Title: 11.10 fails to boot from usb with Boot Error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/925296/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 909869] [NEW] xmonad crashes on start after upgrading to 11.10
Public bug reported: when upgrading from 11.04 to 11.10 the libffi5 package is deleated. if you are upgrading and used xmonad on 11.04 then xmonad will try to use the already compiled xmonad-x86_64-linux in ~/.xmonad that was build from xmonad.hs before the upgrade. This binary will still be linked against the libffi5 package and will try to open libffi.so.5 and then crash because the file does not exist. home/arthur/.xmonad/xmonad-x86_64-linux: error while loading shared libraries: libffi.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory this is easily fixed by logging in with unity and deleting the compiled files rm ~/.xmonad/xmonad-x86_64-linux ~/.xmonad/xmonad.o ~/.xmonad/.hs it would be nice if the post-install step of the .deb package would remove these compiled files on upgrade with a command such as this: rm -f /home/*/.xmonad/xmonad-x86_64-linux rm -f /home/*/.xmonad/xmonad.o rm -f /home/*/.xmonad/xmonad.hi These could be cases where this fails to find users (with non-standard directories) and it may be safer to ensure that ~/.xmonad/xmonad.hs exists to ensure that the user is actually using xmonad (though this may not be required) these already compiled binaries will never work and can always be automatically rebuilt to deleting them seems both wise and safe, as well as much more convenient. -- Description:Ubuntu 11.10 Release:11.10 xmonad: Installed: 0.9.2-2build1 Candidate: 0.9.2-2build1 Version table: *** 0.9.2-2build1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: xmonad (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/909869 Title: xmonad crashes on start after upgrading to 11.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xmonad/+bug/909869/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 811721] Re: update pycryptopp to version 0.5.29-1 in natty
With 11.10 coming soon is this bug still in the works for 11.04? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811721 Title: update pycryptopp to version 0.5.29-1 in natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pycryptopp/+bug/811721/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 843000] [NEW] tahoe-lafs is incompatible with the version of pycryptopp it depends on
Public bug reported:
tahoe-lafs depends on pycryptoapp = 0.5.20 but it's 'dependency' only
provides 0.5.17.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/tahoe, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('allmydata-tahoe==1.8.2', 'console_scripts', 'tahoe')()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 305, in
load_entry_point
return get_distribution(dist).load_entry_point(group, name)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 2244, in
load_entry_point
return ep.load()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 1954, in load
entry = __import__(self.module_name, globals(),globals(), ['__name__'])
File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/allmydata/__init__.py, line 369, in
module
check_all_requirements()
File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/allmydata/__init__.py, line 367, in
check_all_requirements
raise PackagingError(get_error_string(errors, debug=True))
allmydata.PackagingError:
PackagingError: We require pycryptopp = 0.5.20, but could only find version
0.5.17.
The version we found is from '/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7'.
To resolve this problem, uninstall that version, either using your
operating system's package manager or by moving aside the directory.
For debugging purposes, the PYTHONPATH was
None
install_requires was
['setuptools = 0.6c6', 'zfec = 1.1.0', 'simplejson = 1.4',
'zope.interface', 'Twisted = 2.4.0', 'foolscap[secure_connections] = 0.6.1',
'Nevow = 0.6.0', 'pycrypto == 2.0.1, == 2.1.0, = 2.3', 'pyasn1 = 0.0.8a',
'mock', 'pycryptopp = 0.5.20']
sys.path after importing pkg_resources was
/usr/bin:
/usr/lib/python2.7:
/usr/lib/python2.7/plat-linux2:
/usr/lib/python2.7/lib-tk:
/usr/lib/python2.7/lib-old:
/usr/lib/python2.7/lib-dynload:
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages:
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages:
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/PIL:
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/gtk-2.0:
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gst-0.10:
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gtk-2.0:
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7:
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/ubuntuone-storage-protocol:
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/ubuntuone-client:
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/libubuntuone:
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/ubuntuone-control-panel
~$ dpkg -s tahoe-lafs
Package: tahoe-lafs
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: utils
Installed-Size: 4932
Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com
Architecture: all
Version: 1.8.2-0ubuntu1
Depends: python (= 2.5), python-support (= 0.90.0), python-twisted,
python-foolscap (= 0.4.1), python-openssl, python-nevow, python-simplejson (=
1.4), python-zfec (= 1.1), python-pycryptopp (= 0.5.14), python-setuptools
Description: Secure distributed filesystem
Tahoe, the Least Authority File System, is a distributed filesystem that
features high reliability, strong security properties, and a fine-grained
sharing model. Files are encrypted, signed, erasure-coded, then distributed
over multiple servers, such that any (configurable) subset of the servers
will be sufficient to recover the data. The default 3-of-10 configuration
tolerates up to 7 server failures before data becomes unrecoverable.
.
Tahoe offers provider-independent security: the confidentiality and
integrity of your data do not depend upon the behavior of the servers. The
use of erasure-coding means that reliability and availability depend only
upon a subset of the servers.
.
Tahoe files are accessed through a RESTful web API, a human-oriented web
server interface, and CLI tools.
Homepage: http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe
Original-Maintainer: Brian Warner war...@lothar.com
Python-Version: = 2.5
perhaps it should depend on python-pycryptopp (= 0.5.20)
** Affects: tahoe-lafs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/843000
Title:
tahoe-lafs is incompatible with the version of pycryptopp it depends
on
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tahoe-lafs/+bug/843000/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 705845] Re: Suspend on Thinkpad X200s worked in 2.6.35-24-generic but no longer in 2.6.35-25-generic
how long do fixes have to sit in proposed? this bug is a real ongoing problem for a lot of people and I cant recommended using proposed as a general solution? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705845 Title: Suspend on Thinkpad X200s worked in 2.6.35-24-generic but no longer in 2.6.35-25-generic -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 578930] Re: qemu-kvm: ksmd should have a less CPU-hogging default config
In maverick this bug is consuming 20% cpu 100% of the time. it really kills the battery life. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578930 Title: qemu-kvm: ksmd should have a less CPU-hogging default config -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 578930] Re: qemu-kvm: ksmd should have a less CPU-hogging default config
In maverick this bug is consuming 20% cpu 100% of the time. it really kills the battery life. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578930 Title: qemu-kvm: ksmd should have a less CPU-hogging default config -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 601266] [NEW] right shift math errors: 132 = 1
Public bug reported:
the right shift operator produces wrong results when shifting ints by 32
bits.
Description:Ubuntu 9.04
Release:9.04
openjdk-6-jre 6b14-1.4.1-0ubuntu13
Linux cryptovide-dev 2.6.28-18-generic #60-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 12
04:26:47 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
java version 1.6.0_0
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.4.1) (6b14-1.4.1-0ubuntu13)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.0-b08, mixed mode)
class Tmp {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(11 = +(11));
System.out.println(12 = +(12));
System.out.println(131 = +(131));
System.out.println(132 = +(132));
System.out.println(133 = +(133));
}
}
11 = 0
12 = 0
131 = 0
132 = 1 -- should be 0
133 = 0
** Affects: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
right shift math errors: 132 = 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601266
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 601266] Re: right shift math errors: 132 = 1
not actually a bug: the java spec specifies that only the last five bits of the second argument are used. ** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- right shift math errors: 132 = 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601266 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 591893] [NEW] likewise-open depends on psmisc
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: likewise-open needs to depend on package psmisc for the killall command: Setting up likewise-open (5.4.0.42111-2ubuntu1) ... * Starting Likewise Service Manager: lwsmd ...done. * Reloading Likewise Service Manager configuration /usr/lib/likewise-open/init-base.sh: 636: killall: not found- ...fail! dpkg: error processing likewise-open (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** Affects: likewise-open (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - kilewise-open depends on psmisc + likewise-open depends on psmisc -- likewise-open depends on psmisc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 515284] [NEW] sun-java6-jre depends on sun-java6-bin (= 6-15-1) but 6-16-0ubuntu1.9.04 is current
Public bug reported: sudo apt-get install sun-java6-jdk ... The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: sun-java6-jdk: Depends: sun-java6-bin (= 6-15-1) but 6-16-0ubuntu1.9.04 is to be installed E: Broken packages Ubuntu 9.10 installing sun-java6-jdk 6-15-1 sun-java6-bin 6-16-0ubuntu1.9.04 is installed should the sun-java6-jdk package be updated to work with the current sun-java6-bin package? ** Affects: sun-java6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- sun-java6-jre depends on sun-java6-bin (= 6-15-1) but 6-16-0ubuntu1.9.04 is current https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515284 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 515284] Re: sun-java6-jre depends on sun-java6-bin (= 6-15-1) but 6-16-0ubuntu1.9.04 is current
as a workaround you can run sudo apt-get install sun-java6-jre=6-15-1 to downgrade the jre then sudo apt-get install sun-java6-jdk=6-15-1 to install the jdk -- sun-java6-jre depends on sun-java6-bin (= 6-15-1) but 6-16-0ubuntu1.9.04 is current https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515284 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 474888] Re: Cannot install Android plugin ADT
adding http://download.eclipse.org/releases/galileo to the update sites fixed this problem! -- Cannot install Android plugin ADT https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474888 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432140] Re: Pressing restart in only-ubiquity mode throws an endless loop of respawning gdm/ubiquity
I get the same result on running alpha6 as a KVM guest -- Pressing restart in only-ubiquity mode throws an endless loop of respawning gdm/ubiquity https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432140 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.1
It seems to me the .deb should include no plugins, or as close that as possable. and have a plugin manager that hooks into eclipse's plugin manager and causes, perhaps upon first use (ie if no .eclipse dir exists), the main plugins to be installed for that user. This would be able to remain consistent on a multi user system where one user wishes not to ever update anything, and the other user wishes to keep everything current. On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Matteo Settenvini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Probably in a perfect world it'd be possible to override the default update manager behaviour to ask it to create a .deb for each plugin to install... would it be feasible to do that? Just an idea, though. -- Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.1
who should remove this? On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Victor Costan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: @Simos Xenitellis: pointing fingers at another group is corporate and not as helpful as real action. Please, at the very least, admit that Eclipse is unmaintained (and nobody is willing to fix it), and remove it from the list of packages. Thanks! -- Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78848] Re: LUKS removable volume not mounted automatically
not fixed in Hardy -- LUKS removable volume not mounted automatically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/78848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 151327] Re: [Gutsy] fglrx driver doesn't load with linux-image-2.6.22-14-xen
is this bug about the nvidia driver or the ati? -- [Gutsy] fglrx driver doesn't load with linux-image-2.6.22-14-xen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151327 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
