[Bug 605062] Re: (lucid) autofs had a strange behaviour with paths

2010-11-04 Thread tynaud
Hello, Just tried today from a fresh install of Maverick (10.10 32bits). Doesn't work as expected, and you know I'd love to deploy Maverick... If anyone has a hack/turnaround for this, tell me please. -- (lucid) autofs had a strange behaviour with paths https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605062

[Bug 605062] Re: (lucid) autofs had a strange behaviour with paths

2010-11-04 Thread tynaud
Ok, I figured out what was not working. I thought it was quite stupid to use /home/net (which is a symbolic link to /net) in auto.master map, and tried to use the real mount point /net. And it worked as expected. Now I can deploy. I'm so happy !!! Sorry for this useless bug report... --

[Bug 605062] Re: (lucid) autofs had a strange behaviour with paths

2010-11-04 Thread tynaud
Hello, Just tried today from a fresh install of Maverick (10.10 32bits). Doesn't work as expected, and you know I'd love to deploy Maverick... If anyone has a hack/turnaround for this, tell me please. -- (lucid) autofs had a strange behaviour with paths https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605062

[Bug 605062] Re: (lucid) autofs had a strange behaviour with paths

2010-11-04 Thread tynaud
Ok, I figured out what was not working. I thought it was quite stupid to use /home/net (which is a symbolic link to /net) in auto.master map, and tried to use the real mount point /net. And it worked as expected. Now I can deploy. I'm so happy !!! Sorry for this useless bug report... --

[Bug 605062] Re: (lucid) autofs had a strange behaviour with paths

2010-07-15 Thread tynaud
Re-do today the configuration from a fresh install, exactly the same behaviour... -- (lucid) autofs had a strange behaviour with paths https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605062 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in

[Bug 605062] Re: (lucid) autofs had a strange behaviour with paths

2010-07-15 Thread tynaud
Re-do today the configuration from a fresh install, exactly the same behaviour... -- (lucid) autofs had a strange behaviour with paths https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605062 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 605062] [NEW] (lucid) autofs had a strange behaviour with paths

2010-07-13 Thread tynaud
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: autofs5 Hello, (sorry for my english, I will try to make it clear, french here) I'm upgrading my workstations from karmic to lucid 32bits and I've got a strange behaviour with autofs. The home directories (on my.debian.lenny.server:/home/net) are

[Bug 605062] [NEW] (lucid) autofs had a strange behaviour with paths

2010-07-13 Thread tynaud
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: autofs5 Hello, (sorry for my english, I will try to make it clear, french here) I'm upgrading my workstations from karmic to lucid 32bits and I've got a strange behaviour with autofs. The home directories (on my.debian.lenny.server:/home/net) are

[Bug 90388] Re: hostname supplied by dhcp server is not used

2009-11-13 Thread tynaud
Hi all, well, after reinstallation an reconfiguration of the full system, it now works... The only thing i did is to remove the file /etc/hostname (without believing in this action) and it's ok now... So now I can deploy Sorry for that... -- hostname supplied by dhcp server is not used

[Bug 90388] Re: hostname supplied by dhcp server is not used

2009-11-13 Thread tynaud
Hi all, well, after reinstallation an reconfiguration of the full system, it now works... The only thing i did is to remove the file /etc/hostname (without believing in this action) and it's ok now... So now I can deploy Sorry for that... -- hostname supplied by dhcp server is not used

[Bug 90388] Re: hostname supplied by dhcp server is not used

2009-10-15 Thread tynaud
Hello... I was so happy finding this script but it didn't work for me... I tried to use it on karmic today. First I did like on hardy, using a hostname file empty (it was well working), but it seems it prevents the eth0 interface to be brought up networkmanager and even if declared in

[Bug 90388] Re: hostname supplied by dhcp server is not used

2009-10-15 Thread tynaud
Hello... I was so happy finding this script but it didn't work for me... I tried to use it on karmic today. First I did like on hardy, using a hostname file empty (it was well working), but it seems it prevents the eth0 interface to be brought up networkmanager and even if declared in